El Rio Memory Care Community is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Modesto, Stanislaus County, California — state license #502700235, licensed for 72 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 41 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 30, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

11 homes in view

El Rio Memory Care Community

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 72 residents · Modesto, CA · Stanislaus County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #502700235, held since 2017 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
2828 Healthcare Way · Modesto, Stanislaus County
Phone
(209) 543-3805
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 72 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 15 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 72 NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 56 times and filed 41 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated June 30, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 30, 2026
Occupancy at the December 26, 2023 visit
58 of 72 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 11 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 3, 2021 to December 26, 2023. 11 of the 11 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (6). 11 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 11 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 31 of 41 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jun 30, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20255 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20249 state visits · 13 documents
Dec 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20238 state visits · 11 documents
Dec 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure a resident's grooming needs were met Staff did not properly maintain a resident's room Staff allowed a resident to have soiled bedding while in care Staff did not provide adequate supervision to a resident

On 12/26/23 at approximately 12pm, Licensing Program Analyst Maja Jensen arrived at facility unannounced to continue an investigation in to the above listed allegations. LPA Jensen met with Executive Director Kent Mulkey and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA Jensen conducted interviews, met with residents and inspected resident rooms. Staff did not ensure a resident's grooming needs were met: LPA Jensen interviewed 8 of 8 staff present on this date. 8 of 8 staff gave consistent accounts of facility procedures for resident grooming which aligned with the admission agreement and regulation. LPA Jensen also interacted with residents during the course of 2 site visits and observed all residents to be adequately groomed therefore the allegation of Staff did not ensure a resident's grooming needs were met is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegation may have happened, the preponderance of evidence does nthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 26, 2023 · control 27-AS-20231011111327
Dec 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Resident being charged for unagreed services.

On 12/26/23 at approximately 10am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maja Jensen arrived at facility unannounced to continue an investigation in to the above listed allegation. LPA Jensen met with Executive Director Kent Mulkey and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the course of the investigation LPA Jensen reviewed the resident file for Resident 1 (R1) and the admission agreement for R1. LPA Jensen also interviewed the Executive Director and the Director of Resident Services. The admission agreement specifies services that are included in the monthly rate as follows: -24 hour supervision -Laundry, room cleaning -Meals -Activities Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 26, 2023 · control 27-AS-20231026091826
Dec 21, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not seek medical attention for a resident in its care. Facility failed to report resident's scabies to Licensing. Facility failed to notify responsible party.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with director of resident services Caress Brown and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed facility administrator Kent Mulkey, 13 staff members (S1-S13), five residents (R2-R6), and a hospice nurse. Nine of the staff members interviewed were direct care staff, medication technicians, and/or licensed vocational nurses (S4, S5, S6, S7, S9, S10, S11, S12, S13). [continued on 9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 21, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230825145457
Dec 4, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 4, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 27, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility has an outbreak of scabies. Staff did not meet resident's hygiene needs. Staff did not follow protocol when dealing with an infectious outbreak. Facility did not report the rash to family. Facility did not report the rash to licensing.

On 10/27/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Viarella made an unannounced visit to this facility to deliver complaint investigation findings regarding the above allegations. LPA identified herself, the purpose of the visit and asked to speak with the Designated Facility Administrator. The LPA met with Kent Mulkey and a brief interview followed. Regarding: Facility has an outbreak of scabies: On 07/27/23 at 4:43 PM, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint regarding a possible scabies outbreak at El Rio Memory Care. On this same day, LPA Viarella received a phone call from Karan Bassi, the Director of Resident Services (DRS), letting the LPA know that they suspected they might have a resident with scabies. On 08/04/23, the Director sent an LIC 624 stating that they had 4 residents whom they suspected of having scabies, with the first 2 exhibiting symptoms on 07/27/23. On 8/21/23, Stephen Sarine, Regional Director of Operations sent a letter to CCL that acknowledged tthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 27, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230727163804
Oct 18, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 12, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not ensuring that the facility is free of bed bugs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis arrived at the facility unannounced to open an complaint for the above allegations. LPA was greeted by Executive Director and explained the reason for the visit. Resident services director was present as well. LPA Lewis gathered documentation. Facility made copies for LPA of the invoices from clark pest control. As a result of this investigation, this Department found the allegations to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A complaint allegation finding of Unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or was valid, there was not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. There were no deficiencies observed or cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report given. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 12, 2023 · control 27-AS-20231006160848
Oct 12, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 3, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 22, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations16typical 1
Type B citations9typical 1
Substantiated complaints23typical 2
Total complaints18typical 7
State visits on file56typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2017.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020255602024913020231216220224412021330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Stanislaus County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (209) 543-3805

Is El Rio Memory Care Community licensed?

Yes — El Rio Memory Care Community is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Modesto (Stanislaus County): California license #502700235, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 72 residents. State records list 41 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 30, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can El Rio Memory Care Community care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists El Rio Memory Care Community with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 72 NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15.

How much does El Rio Memory Care Community cost?

California's public licensing record does not include El Rio Memory Care Community's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Stanislaus County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does El Rio Memory Care Community accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

El Rio Memory Care Community is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

58 of 72 beds occupied (81%) when the state visited on December 26, 2023. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for El Rio Memory Care Community?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 56 state visits and 41 dated documents since 2021 for El Rio Memory Care Community; 11 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 26, 2023, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

11 transcribed reports on file

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure a resident's grooming needs were met Staff did not properly maintain a resident's room Staff allowed a resident to have soiled bedding while in care Staff did not provide adequate supervision to a resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 12/26/23 at approximately 12pm, Licensing Program Analyst Maja Jensen arrived at facility unannounced to continue an investigation in to the above listed allegations. LPA Jensen met with Executive Director Kent Mulkey and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA Jensen conducted interviews, met with residents and inspected resident rooms. Staff did not ensure a resident's grooming needs were met: LPA Jensen interviewed 8 of 8 staff present on this date. 8 of 8 staff gave consistent accounts of facility procedures for resident grooming which aligned with the admission agreement and regulation. LPA Jensen also interacted with residents during the course of 2 site visits and observed all residents to be adequately groomed therefore the allegation of Staff did not ensure a resident's grooming needs were met is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegation may have happened, the preponderance of evidence does nCDSS inspection report, December 26, 2023 · control 27-AS-20231011111327
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResident being charged for unagreed services.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 12/26/23 at approximately 10am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maja Jensen arrived at facility unannounced to continue an investigation in to the above listed allegation. LPA Jensen met with Executive Director Kent Mulkey and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the course of the investigation LPA Jensen reviewed the resident file for Resident 1 (R1) and the admission agreement for R1. LPA Jensen also interviewed the Executive Director and the Director of Resident Services. The admission agreement specifies services that are included in the monthly rate as follows: -24 hour supervision -Laundry, room cleaning -Meals -Activities UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, December 26, 2023 · control 27-AS-20231026091826
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not seek medical attention for a resident in its care. Facility failed to report resident's scabies to Licensing. Facility failed to notify responsible party.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with director of resident services Caress Brown and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed facility administrator Kent Mulkey, 13 staff members (S1-S13), five residents (R2-R6), and a hospice nurse. Nine of the staff members interviewed were direct care staff, medication technicians, and/or licensed vocational nurses (S4, S5, S6, S7, S9, S10, S11, S12, S13). [continued on 9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 21, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230825145457
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has an outbreak of scabies. Staff did not meet resident's hygiene needs. Staff did not follow protocol when dealing with an infectious outbreak. Facility did not report the rash to family. Facility did not report the rash to licensing.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 10/27/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Viarella made an unannounced visit to this facility to deliver complaint investigation findings regarding the above allegations. LPA identified herself, the purpose of the visit and asked to speak with the Designated Facility Administrator. The LPA met with Kent Mulkey and a brief interview followed. Regarding: Facility has an outbreak of scabies: On 07/27/23 at 4:43 PM, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint regarding a possible scabies outbreak at El Rio Memory Care. On this same day, LPA Viarella received a phone call from Karan Bassi, the Director of Resident Services (DRS), letting the LPA know that they suspected they might have a resident with scabies. On 08/04/23, the Director sent an LIC 624 stating that they had 4 residents whom they suspected of having scabies, with the first 2 exhibiting symptoms on 07/27/23. On 8/21/23, Stephen Sarine, Regional Director of Operations sent a letter to CCL that acknowledged tCDSS inspection report, October 27, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230727163804
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not ensuring that the facility is free of bed bugs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis arrived at the facility unannounced to open an complaint for the above allegations. LPA was greeted by Executive Director and explained the reason for the visit. Resident services director was present as well. LPA Lewis gathered documentation. Facility made copies for LPA of the invoices from clark pest control. As a result of this investigation, this Department found the allegations to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A complaint allegation finding of Unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or was valid, there was not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. There were no deficiencies observed or cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report given. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 12, 2023 · control 27-AS-20231006160848
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not reposition resident resulting in pressure wound Facility failed to seek timely medical care for pressure wound.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Jason Lund conducted an unannounced visit on 3/29/2023 to amend the complaint and met with Administrator Mary Keaton and explained the reason for the visit. LPA Lund met with Administrator Carlin Robertson and explained the purpose of today's visit.Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Jason Lund conducted an unannounced visit at the facility to Facility failed to seek timely medical care for the Resident’s pressure wound- On November 9th, 2022, resident (R1) was observed to have a lump on the right buttock that was hard, raw, extremely red and warm to touch. A Medical Physician was notified, and medication was prescribed. On November 13, 2022 the lump ruptured got grey and was infected. R1 complained that the wound was hurting, wasn’t feeling well and felt cold. On November 14th, 2022, R1 ate a small amount of breakfast and did not feel well. R1 did not want to eat dinner and went to bed early. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 14, 2023 · control 27-AS-20221122165627
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not following COVID-19 guidelines.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 2-14-23 at 12:55pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to open and investigate the complaint allegation noted above. LPA met with Administrator Mary Keaton and explained the purpose of the visit. During this investigation, LPA conducted interviews with Resident1 (R1), R2, and R3. LPA also conducted interviews with Administrator, Staff1(S1), S2, and S3. Additionally, LPA conducted facility observation including common areas, resident rooms, dining areas, and activity areas as well as caregiver stations. Based on interviews and observations, it was determined that facility is currently following COVID-19 precautions. LPA observed all staff to be wearing masks, and promoting social distancing as necessary. Additionally, LPA observed hand washing stations, appropriate availability of hand sanitizers, availability of additional masks, gowns, and other personal protective equipment (PPE) located in facility's storage areas and other areas available for stafCDSS inspection report, February 14, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230209081012

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not report incidents.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA’S) Kesha Lewis and Albert Johnson conducted an unannounced facility visit on 11/03/2022 to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA’S met with Administrator Mary Keaton and explained the purpose of today's visit. The purpose of the visit is to deliver complaint investigation findings from an incident reported to the department received on 08/22/2022. Based upon documentation reviewed LPA’s observed multiple unwitnessed falls documented on internal documentation 6/30/2022, 7/5/2022, 7/6/2022, 7/19/2022,7/20/2022,7/22/2022. Interviews conducted with administrator and director of resident services they conformed that they do not send incident reports for falls unless resident is sent out to emergency room. R1’s Physician’s report states the resident has a history of falls. Based on records reviews and interviews LPA’S found inconsistencies with facilities incident reports and the department having no record of reports for those dates. Therefore, the secCDSS inspection report, November 3, 2022 · control 27-AS-20220822080756
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not properly trained to deal with resident Resident left in soiled diapers Resident got into an altercation with another resident due to lack of supervision
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced facility visit to deliver findings on a complaint investigation. LPA Hurt met with facility lead nurse Robin Mendez and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation facility staff are not properly trained to deal with resident. Based on interviews and records reviewed the staff are properly trained to deal with dementia residents. LPA reviewed facility training documents that reflects the facility staff is receiving the required dementia training needed to assist facility dementia residents. LPA interviewed six facility staff who stated they were given training upon hiring, and they are also given 12 hours training annually including shadowing, class work, and videos. LPA reviewed facility training documents to include quizzes given to facility staff throughout the year about dementia. The facility staff interviewed all explained different techniques used to re direct residents, keep residents busy,CDSS inspection report, October 11, 2022 · control 27-AS-20220907164059
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has bed bugs Unqualified staff giving insulin to residents Unqualified staff doing wound care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced visit to the facility September 26, 2022 at 10:30 a.m. to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA Hurt met with facility Administrator Mary Keaton and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation Facility has bed bugs. Based on interviews and records reviewed the facility does not currently have any resident rooms with active bed bugs. The facility did previously have rooms with bed bugs beginning in March 2022. Administrator Mary Keaton provided records documenting the local exterminator has been to the facility several times to inspect, and spray or heat treat different rooms. Administrator Mary Keaton stated the local exterminator would come out same day to confirm if there was actually bed bugs. Administrator Mary Keaton stated as soon as the resident rooms were confirmed to have bed bugs the staff would remove the resident from the room along with all clothing, and bedding to wash in high heCDSS inspection report, September 26, 2022 · control 27-AS-20220815142727

2021

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff denied resident from having visitors Resident not awarded privacy Staff denied resident a phone
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced visit to the facility on September 3, 2021 to deliver complaint findings. LPA identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Mary Keaton. This investigation consisted of interviews with facility Administrator, complainant, and resident. Also reviewing of the resident files and facility records, and legal documents related to this complaint. Regarding the allegation that staff denied resident from having visitors. Based on LPA's interview with Administrator, complainant, and resident (R1), review of medical files, admission agreement, residence care plan, and temporary restraining order. It was determined that all persons not mentioned in the restraining order were still allowed to visit, call and have contact with resident. Only those mentioned in order were denied access to resident. This agency has investigated the allegation noted above and have found that the facility never denied resiCDSS inspection report, September 3, 2021 · control 27-AS-20210728145900

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 56 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
16
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
9
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
23
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
18
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
56
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(209) 543-3805
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run El Rio Memory Care Community? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.