Ivy Park At Rockville is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fairfield, Solano County, California — state license #486803653, licensed for 199 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 60 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 16, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

3 homes in view

Ivy Park At Rockville

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 199 residents · Fairfield, CA · Solano County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #486803653, held since 2016 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
4625 Mangels Blvd · Fairfield, Solano County
Phone
(707) 356-2229
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 169 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careVerified in record

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 169 NON-AMBULATORY AND 30 BEDRIDDEN. FOR A TOTAL CAPACITY OF 199. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20 RESIDENTS. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY, OAKMONT MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC, EFFECTIVE 04/01/2025.State service designation945 - ADULTS / ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 74 times and filed 60 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated June 16, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 16, 2026
Occupancy at the January 21, 2025 visit
148 of 199 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 25 documents with transcribed findings, dated November 17, 2021 to January 21, 2025. 25 of the 25 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (15), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (9). 25 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 25 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 32 of 60 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20266 state visits · 7 documents
Jun 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 12, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202512 state visits · 14 documents
Dec 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are mismanaging resident's medication

Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. LPA met with the Administrator and discussed the disposition. Through statements and document reviews it has been determined that R1 was prescribed Tramadol to be dosed 1/2 50 mg tab at bedtime as needed for pain but was administered 50 milligrams on several occasions in December, 2024, including 12/09, 12/15, 12/22; and some doses were given twice a day at times other than bedtime. Facility Administration has acknowledged the errors and has taken steps to retrain staff and place protocols in place to avoid future errors. Based upon the statements and documents reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 9099D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 21, 2025 · control 21-AS-20241226085057
20246 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not assist resident with transportation needs. Staff did not assist resident with care needs in a timely manner. Staff threatened resident.

Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. LPA met with **** and discussed the disposition. Complainant has alleged that facility staff are not responsive to Complainant's needs and cites having to wait for transportation to appointments, not responding timely to calls for assistance and making threatening remarks to Complainant. This investigation included a review of documents and taking of statements from parties and witnesses. Facility staff deny the allegations. A review of the facility policy regarding transportation for residents suggests that reasonable accommodations are made for the residents, including the Complainant. Complainant did not initially provide a date that staff did not respond in a timely manner and, when pressed, gave a date subsequent to the lodging of this complaint. This investigation found no evidence that staff have threatened the Complainant but did determine that exceptional efforts werthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 17, 2024 · control 21-AS-20241105153420
Dec 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident care needs not being met Staff smoking marijuana on the premises Cleaning supplies accessible to residents in care

Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint and met with *****.Complainant alleges resident care needs not being met, staff smoking marijuana on the premises and cleaning supplies accessible to residents in care. Complainant informed care needs are not being met not limited to hygiene and dental care. The 10-day complaint inspection was conducted on 8/29/2024 by LPA Hansen. Hansen made observations, obtained resident records, and conducted interviews. During the course of the investigation, it was revealed that resident (R1) was admitted to the facility 11/2022 and vacated 6/2024. R1’s current service plan signed on 11/12/2023 indicated that R1 was a level 1 needing minimal assistance with ADLs. Medical assessment obtained dated 7/10/2023 supported care needs and indicated R1 has been doing better with supervision. The Department received photos and a document signed by dentist dated 6/12/2024 indicating poor dental hygthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 3, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240823135406
Nov 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent a resident from sustaining multiple falls while in care. Staff are not following resident's care plan.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint. Based upon information obtained during this investigation, which included interviewing staff and outside parties and record reviews, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Interviews and record review revealed resident listed as R1 requires “maximum assistance” with toileting, transfers, mobility, bathing (2x per week), dressing, grooming and medication management. R1 requires “moderate assistance” with coordination of outside agencies and oral hygiene. Service Plan dated 8/11/2024 corroborates the information above and details the assistance required, per Service Plan, R1 is a level 4. An updated Service Plan on record, dated 10/31/2024, shows R1 requires “maximum assistance” with toileting, transfers, mobility, bathing (2x per week), dressing, grooming, medication management and special needs – safety checks 4x per shift and rolling out of bed. R1 requires “moderate assistance” with coordinthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 19, 2024 · control 21-AS-20241018122417
Oct 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility has bed bugs

Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced in response to the allegation the facility has bed bugs. LPA met with Executive Director Carol Dowell. Based on a review of records which includes service orders and receipts from Clark Pest Control, interviews with staff and outside agencies the allegation of “facility has bed bugs” is SUBSTANTIATED. Facility reported September 23, 2024 was the first sighting of a bed bug in the facility, it was brought to the attention of staff who reached out to Clark Pest Control the same day. Clark conducted on inspection on September 24th. Residents and responsible parties in the areas impacted were notified via a letter, copy provided to the Department. September 26, 2024 Clark set-up the first heat treatment in two (2) rooms in the facility. On September 27, 2024, Clark returned to treat eight (8) additional rooms, they received a bio-spray treatment to ensure the bedbugs do not spread. On September 27, 2024 Clark did an in-service trainingthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 22, 2024 · control 21-AS-20241016223345
Aug 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident continence care needs not being met

On 5/16/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and was greeted by Administrator, Carol Dowell. LPA toured the facility, interviewed Administrator and outside parties, reviewed resident medical and facility records and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges resident (R1) continence care needs not being met. Based upon interview with outside Home Health Agency Lead Staff (I1), LPA found that there are multiple documented incidents in which R1 had been observed in soiled continence briefs when received by home health nurse (I2). In addition, R1's physician's report indicates that R1 has a bowel and bladder impairment condition indicating an increased level of supervision for R1's continence care needs which is documented on R1's Service Plan. Allegation, continence care needs not being met is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is SUBSTANTIATEDthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 16, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240220181337
20234 state visits · 5 documents
Oct 4, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide proper medication assistance to resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Farhaan Saragi arrived unannounced at Rockville Terrace Senior Living for the purpose of delivering complaint findings. LPA was greeted at the door by, Assistant Administrator, Hannah Richardson, and was granted access into the facility. Administrator arrived 30 minutes later. During the course of the investigation, LPA Sarangi reviewed residents Medication Assessment Records, facility records and interviewed staff. Complaint alleges that Staff do not provide proper medication assistance to resident in care. Based on an observation of the Medication Assessment Record (MAR) that was conducted, LPA learned that during the months of April 2023 there were gaps in the administration of medication for multiple medications which included eye drops for Resident #1 (See LIC 9099D). A former staff member missed the administration of eye drops on April 19-23, 2023, April 27 & 28, 2023 and April 30, 2023. An interview with the Administrator confirmed the missed medthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 4, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230918161317
Oct 4, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 21, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not repair a water leak in a resident's room

Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrives unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. On 8/22/2023 Complainant alleged that the facility did not repair a leaking air conditioning unit and that the issue was reported three weeks prior. Administration claims the repair request was made one week prior and that maintenance attempted to repair the unit unsuccessfully which necessitated ordering parts and, ultimately, a new unit which was installed on September 4, 2023. Investigation indicates the facility made reasonable efforts to repair and replace the unit and that the apartment was observed to be a comfortable temperature at the time a site visit was made. Administration further reports that the apartment contains two AC units and that the apartment was kept within the temperature range required by Title Twenty-Two regulation 87303(b)(2) at all times. Although this allegation may be true, based upon the statements made, documents reviewed, as well as site visitthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 21, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230822094748
Aug 29, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not assist resident as needed/required.

**Amended from original report dated 8/29/2023. Original report was signed by Josephine Garcia-Evans. Amended report dated 9/7/2023 is signed by Administrator, Carol Dowell.** Licensing Program Analyst Leibert (LPA) arrived unannounced to deliver complaint investigation findings. The Department toured the facility, interviewed residents, reviewed resident records and made observations. Complaint alleges staff did not assist resident (R1) as needed/required regarding services for ambulation and assistance upon medical appointment check-ins. Based upon a review of R1’s resident records including Physician’s Report, Resident Appraisal and Resident Assessment; although R1 is non-ambulatory and utilizing a walker, there is no indication that R1 requires or is to be provided these additional services from the facility with ambulation assistance, transferring or mobility. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging staff did not assist resident as needed/required. We have found that tthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 29, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230803132825
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations16typical 1
Type B citations12typical 1
Substantiated complaints27typical 2
Total complaints37typical 7
State visits on file74typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2016.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20266702025121412024662202391132022141782021451
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Solano County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (707) 356-2229

Is Ivy Park At Rockville licensed?

Yes — Ivy Park At Rockville is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fairfield (Solano County): California license #486803653, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 199 residents. State records list 60 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 16, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Ivy Park At Rockville care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Ivy Park At Rockville with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 169 NON-AMBULATORY AND 30 BEDRIDDEN. FOR A TOTAL CAPACITY OF 199. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20 RESIDENTS. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY, OAKMONT MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC, EFFECTIVE 04/01/2025.

How much does Ivy Park At Rockville cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Ivy Park At Rockville's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Solano County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Ivy Park At Rockville accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Ivy Park At Rockville is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

148 of 199 beds occupied (74%) when the state visited on January 21, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Ivy Park At Rockville?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 74 state visits and 60 dated documents since 2021 for Ivy Park At Rockville; 25 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated January 21, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

25 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are mismanaging resident's medication
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. LPA met with the Administrator and discussed the disposition. Through statements and document reviews it has been determined that R1 was prescribed Tramadol to be dosed 1/2 50 mg tab at bedtime as needed for pain but was administered 50 milligrams on several occasions in December, 2024, including 12/09, 12/15, 12/22; and some doses were given twice a day at times other than bedtime. Facility Administration has acknowledged the errors and has taken steps to retrain staff and place protocols in place to avoid future errors. Based upon the statements and documents reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 9099D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficienciCDSS inspection report, January 21, 2025 · control 21-AS-20241226085057

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not assist resident with transportation needs. Staff did not assist resident with care needs in a timely manner. Staff threatened resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. LPA met with **** and discussed the disposition. Complainant has alleged that facility staff are not responsive to Complainant's needs and cites having to wait for transportation to appointments, not responding timely to calls for assistance and making threatening remarks to Complainant. This investigation included a review of documents and taking of statements from parties and witnesses. Facility staff deny the allegations. A review of the facility policy regarding transportation for residents suggests that reasonable accommodations are made for the residents, including the Complainant. Complainant did not initially provide a date that staff did not respond in a timely manner and, when pressed, gave a date subsequent to the lodging of this complaint. This investigation found no evidence that staff have threatened the Complainant but did determine that exceptional efforts werCDSS inspection report, December 17, 2024 · control 21-AS-20241105153420
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident care needs not being met Staff smoking marijuana on the premises Cleaning supplies accessible to residents in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint and met with *****.Complainant alleges resident care needs not being met, staff smoking marijuana on the premises and cleaning supplies accessible to residents in care. Complainant informed care needs are not being met not limited to hygiene and dental care. The 10-day complaint inspection was conducted on 8/29/2024 by LPA Hansen. Hansen made observations, obtained resident records, and conducted interviews. During the course of the investigation, it was revealed that resident (R1) was admitted to the facility 11/2022 and vacated 6/2024. R1’s current service plan signed on 11/12/2023 indicated that R1 was a level 1 needing minimal assistance with ADLs. Medical assessment obtained dated 7/10/2023 supported care needs and indicated R1 has been doing better with supervision. The Department received photos and a document signed by dentist dated 6/12/2024 indicating poor dental hygCDSS inspection report, December 3, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240823135406
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent a resident from sustaining multiple falls while in care. Staff are not following resident's care plan.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint. Based upon information obtained during this investigation, which included interviewing staff and outside parties and record reviews, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Interviews and record review revealed resident listed as R1 requires “maximum assistance” with toileting, transfers, mobility, bathing (2x per week), dressing, grooming and medication management. R1 requires “moderate assistance” with coordination of outside agencies and oral hygiene. Service Plan dated 8/11/2024 corroborates the information above and details the assistance required, per Service Plan, R1 is a level 4. An updated Service Plan on record, dated 10/31/2024, shows R1 requires “maximum assistance” with toileting, transfers, mobility, bathing (2x per week), dressing, grooming, medication management and special needs – safety checks 4x per shift and rolling out of bed. R1 requires “moderate assistance” with coordinCDSS inspection report, November 19, 2024 · control 21-AS-20241018122417
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has bed bugs
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced in response to the allegation the facility has bed bugs. LPA met with Executive Director Carol Dowell. Based on a review of records which includes service orders and receipts from Clark Pest Control, interviews with staff and outside agencies the allegation of “facility has bed bugs” is SUBSTANTIATED. Facility reported September 23, 2024 was the first sighting of a bed bug in the facility, it was brought to the attention of staff who reached out to Clark Pest Control the same day. Clark conducted on inspection on September 24th. Residents and responsible parties in the areas impacted were notified via a letter, copy provided to the Department. September 26, 2024 Clark set-up the first heat treatment in two (2) rooms in the facility. On September 27, 2024, Clark returned to treat eight (8) additional rooms, they received a bio-spray treatment to ensure the bedbugs do not spread. On September 27, 2024 Clark did an in-service trainingCDSS inspection report, October 22, 2024 · control 21-AS-20241016223345
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident continence care needs not being met
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 5/16/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and was greeted by Administrator, Carol Dowell. LPA toured the facility, interviewed Administrator and outside parties, reviewed resident medical and facility records and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges resident (R1) continence care needs not being met. Based upon interview with outside Home Health Agency Lead Staff (I1), LPA found that there are multiple documented incidents in which R1 had been observed in soiled continence briefs when received by home health nurse (I2). In addition, R1's physician's report indicates that R1 has a bowel and bladder impairment condition indicating an increased level of supervision for R1's continence care needs which is documented on R1's Service Plan. Allegation, continence care needs not being met is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is SUBSTANTIATEDCDSS inspection report, May 16, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240220181337

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide proper medication assistance to resident in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Farhaan Saragi arrived unannounced at Rockville Terrace Senior Living for the purpose of delivering complaint findings. LPA was greeted at the door by, Assistant Administrator, Hannah Richardson, and was granted access into the facility. Administrator arrived 30 minutes later. During the course of the investigation, LPA Sarangi reviewed residents Medication Assessment Records, facility records and interviewed staff. Complaint alleges that Staff do not provide proper medication assistance to resident in care. Based on an observation of the Medication Assessment Record (MAR) that was conducted, LPA learned that during the months of April 2023 there were gaps in the administration of medication for multiple medications which included eye drops for Resident #1 (See LIC 9099D). A former staff member missed the administration of eye drops on April 19-23, 2023, April 27 & 28, 2023 and April 30, 2023. An interview with the Administrator confirmed the missed medCDSS inspection report, October 4, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230918161317
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not repair a water leak in a resident's room
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrives unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. On 8/22/2023 Complainant alleged that the facility did not repair a leaking air conditioning unit and that the issue was reported three weeks prior. Administration claims the repair request was made one week prior and that maintenance attempted to repair the unit unsuccessfully which necessitated ordering parts and, ultimately, a new unit which was installed on September 4, 2023. Investigation indicates the facility made reasonable efforts to repair and replace the unit and that the apartment was observed to be a comfortable temperature at the time a site visit was made. Administration further reports that the apartment contains two AC units and that the apartment was kept within the temperature range required by Title Twenty-Two regulation 87303(b)(2) at all times. Although this allegation may be true, based upon the statements made, documents reviewed, as well as site visitCDSS inspection report, September 21, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230822094748
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not assist resident as needed/required.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
**Amended from original report dated 8/29/2023. Original report was signed by Josephine Garcia-Evans. Amended report dated 9/7/2023 is signed by Administrator, Carol Dowell.** Licensing Program Analyst Leibert (LPA) arrived unannounced to deliver complaint investigation findings. The Department toured the facility, interviewed residents, reviewed resident records and made observations. Complaint alleges staff did not assist resident (R1) as needed/required regarding services for ambulation and assistance upon medical appointment check-ins. Based upon a review of R1’s resident records including Physician’s Report, Resident Appraisal and Resident Assessment; although R1 is non-ambulatory and utilizing a walker, there is no indication that R1 requires or is to be provided these additional services from the facility with ambulation assistance, transferring or mobility. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging staff did not assist resident as needed/required. We have found that tCDSS inspection report, August 29, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230803132825
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not meet residents' incontinence needs and staff do not assist resident with grooming Staff do not provide resident with bed linen and shower areas are not equipped with shower curtains Staff do not properly monitor residents for change in condition Staff do not supply residents with a personal item Staff do not safeguard residents' personal belongings
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Farhaan Sarangi arrived unannounced at Rockville Terrace Senior Living for the purpose of delivering complaint findings. LPA was greeted at the front door by Administrator, Carol Dowell, and was granted access into the facility. During the course of the investigation, LPA Sarangi reviewed resident(s) records, facility records, interviewed staff, residents and various outside parties, including but not limited to responsible parties and witnesses. Complaint alleges that Staff do not meet residents' incontinence needs and staff do not assist resident with grooming. Based on interviews that were conducted throughout the investigation, LPA could not prove or disprove the allegation due to inconsistent statements made throughout the course of the investigation. (Report continued on LIC 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 15, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230322143424
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedPersonal Rights
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Farhaan Sarangi arrived unannounced at Rockville Terrace Senior Living for the purpose of delivering complaint findings. LPA was greeted at the front door by Care Coordinator, Josephine Garcia-Evans, and was granted access into the facility. Administrator arrived 15 minutes later. During the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed resident records, facility records, interviewed staff and a resident in care. Complaint alleges Personal Rights. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed facility staff and learned that a former staff member was verbally arguing with Resident #1. Furthermore, during an interview with the former staff member on March 24, 2023, LPA learned that there was a verbal altercation with Resident #1, and that her boss was notified of the altercation with the Resident. Subsequently, the former staff member was terminated due to the incident (See LIC 9099D). (Report continued on LIC 9099C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 11, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230214132130
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not allow family members to visit resident in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Farhaan Sarangi arrived unannounced at Rockville Terrace Senior Living for the purpose of interviewing the Administrator and delivered complaint findings. LPA was greeted at the front door by Administrator, Mikayla Muehleisen and was granted access into the facility. During the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed resident records, facility records, Program Plan of Operation, interviewed staff, witnesses and resident in care. Complaint alleges that Staff did not allow family members to visit resident in care. LPA conducted interviews with staff and a resident. LPA learned throughout the course of the investigation that on January 17, 2023 a visit was barred for one visitor that came to visit a resident. During a subsequent complaint investigation inspection on February 14, 2023, LPA and Administrator reviewed the Visitors Log for said date and no names were reflected on the Visitor Log for the said date. (Report continued on LIC 9099C) SubstantiateCDSS inspection report, February 14, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230209115409
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not meet resident's dietary needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Farhaan Sarangi arrived unannounced at Rockville Terrace Senior Living for the purpose of delivering complaint findings and interviewing an additional resident. LPA was greeted at the door by Administrator, Mikayla Muehleisen, and was granted access into the facility. During the course of the investigation, LPA Sarangi interviewed staff, residents and various outside parties, including but not limited to responsible parties and witnesses. LPA reviewed facility documents including but not limited to staff roster, resident roster and food menu. Complaint alleges that facility does not meet resident's dietary needs. Based off of interviews that were conducted with additional residents and staff, LPA could not prove or disprove that the facility does not meet resident's dietary needs due to inconsistent statements made during the course of the investigation. LPA could not corroborate the allegation. (Report continued on LIC 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 9, 2023 · control 21-AS-20221025110016

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 74 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
16
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
12
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
27
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
37
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
74
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(707) 356-2229
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Ivy Park At Rockville? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.