Maravilla is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara County, California — state license #425801937, licensed for 131 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 20 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated February 24, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

15 homes in view

Maravilla

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 131 residents · Santa Barbara, CA · Santa Barbara County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #425801937, held since 2015 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
5486 Calle Real · Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara County
Phone
(805) 967-1965
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
srgseniorliving.com
listed by the county Area Agency on Aging, April 7, 2025
Listing details can lag reality — confirm anything important by phone.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 131 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 18 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 60 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
131 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 60 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 18.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 20 times and filed 20 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated February 24, 2026.

Most recent state visit
February 24, 2026
Occupancy at the October 21, 2025 visit
105 of 131 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 11 documents with transcribed findings, dated December 30, 2021 to October 21, 2025. 11 of the 11 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (5). 11 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 11 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 10 of 20 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Feb 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20252 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff left residents in soiled diapers for an extended period of time. Staff did not communicate with resident's authorized representative in a timely manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Leon conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility above to deliver final findings of the allegations. LPA met with Director of AL Anna Munoz and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Kristin Kontilis conducted the initial 10-day complaint visit on 09/25/2024 and collected records. LPA Kontilis interviewed Witness 09/27/2024 and 10/11/2024. LPA De Leon reviewed complaint records on 08/01/2025 and 08/02/2025. LPA De Leon emailed the Administrator on 08/02/2025 asking a few questions and requesting additional documentation. LPA received an email from the Administrator on 08/07/2025 answering questions and providing additional documentation. LPA De Leon reviewed additional records on 08/11/2025 and made a subsequent complaint visit on 10/14/2025 to conduct additonal interviews. Continued 9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 21, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240918090505
Oct 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek medical attention for a resident in care. Staff did not notify resident's responsible party of an incident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Leon conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility above. LPA met with Anna Munoz Director of Assisted Living and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Kontilis started the investigation on 09/05/2025. During the visit, LPA obtained documents, and conducted interviews with staff and residents from 11:47am to 3:30pm. LPA Kontilis conducted additional interviews by phone on 09/08/2025, and LPA De Leon conducted interviews by phone on 08/11/2025, 08/27/2025, and 10/14/2025. On the allegation: Staff did not seek medical attention for a resident in care. It was alleged Resident 1 (R1) sustained a fall and did not get timely medical attention. Continued 9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 21, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250903130423
Feb 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 4 documents
Sep 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kristin Kontilis conducted a subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings. During today’s visit, LPA met with Ruth Grande, Executive Director and explained the reason for the visit. LPA initiated the investigation on 7/15/2024 from 12:28pm to 4:30pm. During the visit, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and residents, and obtained relevant documents. LPA also conducted additional interviews by phone on 7/29/2024 and 7/30/2024. On the allegation: Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings. It was alleged some of Resident 1 (R1)’s jewelry went missing from their room while R1 was in the hospital. R1 went to the hospital on 6/21/2024 and returned on 7/5/2024. R1 resides in the assisted living portion of the facility and does not have a diagnosis of dementia per their physician’s report. When R1 returned to their room on 7/5/2024, they went to their jewelry box to put their watch away and found a total of 11 items were missing, comprthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240711102809
Sep 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not assist resident to the correct room.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erika Miller (Miller) conducted an unannounced complaint visit on January 16, 2024. On June 7, 2024. LPA issued final findings on the allegations above. During the investigation, LPA Miller, toured the facility and interviewed staff on January 16, 2024, from 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. LPA also obtained and reviewed relevant documents. LPA met with Ruth Grande, administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. On the allegation: Staff did not assist resident to the correct room. It was alleged that caregivers mixed up two male residents in the memory care unit (Resident 1 and Resident 2). LPA interviewed R1’s visitor, who stated on January 6, 2024 they visited the facility and asked staff where R1 was. Staff replied R1 was in their room being changed. When the visitor arrived at R1’s room, visitor saw R2 being changed in R1’s room. Visitor stated they found R1 across the hall in R2’s room, sleeping. (Cont.on 9099-C) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 7, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240110084949
Feb 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20232 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 10, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff handled resident roughly Facility staff verbally abused Resident(s) Facility did not accord Resident(s) with dignity Facility did not meet Resident's needs Facility failed to safeguard Resident(s) belongings

On 10/10/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Phillips conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to the facility above. LPA arrived at the facility, met with Christina Martinez, LVN, as the Administrator was not available, and announced the purpose of the visit. On the allegation: Facility Staff handled resident roughly. It is alleged by the Reporting Party (RP) that Facility Staff used forceful behavior towards residents who were clearly in physical pain. RP alleged Staff were overly aggressive with forcing resident(s) to sit down in specific places. Staff would forcefully take away items from residents. RP alleged that Staff members told RP they needed to use force with residents to get them to do what the Staff wants such as changing them, seating them, etc. Staff would allegedly stand in front of a seated resident so they couldn’t get up, grabbing the residents harshly allegedly causing bruising on 2 residents on their arms. RP additionally alleged that Staff wouldthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2023 · control 29-AS-20210709104343
Sep 29, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff not meeting the incontinence needs of the resident(s) in care. Resident sustained injury while in care. Staff does not communicate with authorized representative. Staff failed to give medications as prescribed. Staff is insufficient in numbers/knowledge to meet the residents needs.

On 09/29/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Phillips conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to the facility above. LPA arrived at the facility, met with Licensed Vocational Nurse Jessica Hernandez as the Administrator was not available, and announced the purpose of the visit. On the allegation: Facility staff not meeting the incontinence needs of the resident(s) in care. It is alleged by the Reporting Party (RP) that a resident pressed the call button for incontinence assistance but was left for three hours in a soiled diaper as no Staff member responded. RP reported that they have observed old, soiled linens in the laundry basket of the resident. On 09/21/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted an initial complaint investigation visit to the facility above. Through interview of Staff members and residents, LPA observation, and record review the LPA found no evidence of the allegation that the facility Staff were not meeting the incontinence needs of the rthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 29, 2023 · control 29-AS-20220913135747
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations5typical 1
Substantiated complaints6typical 2
Total complaints9typical 7
State visits on file20typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2015.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020252322024341202337220223302021220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — Santa Barbara County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (805) 967-1965

Is Maravilla licensed?

Yes — Maravilla is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Santa Barbara (Santa Barbara County): California license #425801937, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 131 residents. State records list 20 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated February 24, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Maravilla care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Maravilla with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record131 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 60 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 18.

How much does Maravilla cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Maravilla's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Santa Barbara County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Maravilla accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Maravilla is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

105 of 131 beds occupied (80%) when the state visited on October 21, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Maravilla?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 20 state visits and 20 dated documents since 2021 for Maravilla; 11 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 21, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

11 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff left residents in soiled diapers for an extended period of time. Staff did not communicate with resident's authorized representative in a timely manner.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Leon conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility above to deliver final findings of the allegations. LPA met with Director of AL Anna Munoz and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Kristin Kontilis conducted the initial 10-day complaint visit on 09/25/2024 and collected records. LPA Kontilis interviewed Witness 09/27/2024 and 10/11/2024. LPA De Leon reviewed complaint records on 08/01/2025 and 08/02/2025. LPA De Leon emailed the Administrator on 08/02/2025 asking a few questions and requesting additional documentation. LPA received an email from the Administrator on 08/07/2025 answering questions and providing additional documentation. LPA De Leon reviewed additional records on 08/11/2025 and made a subsequent complaint visit on 10/14/2025 to conduct additonal interviews. Continued 9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 21, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240918090505
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not seek medical attention for a resident in care. Staff did not notify resident's responsible party of an incident.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Leon conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility above. LPA met with Anna Munoz Director of Assisted Living and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Kontilis started the investigation on 09/05/2025. During the visit, LPA obtained documents, and conducted interviews with staff and residents from 11:47am to 3:30pm. LPA Kontilis conducted additional interviews by phone on 09/08/2025, and LPA De Leon conducted interviews by phone on 08/11/2025, 08/27/2025, and 10/14/2025. On the allegation: Staff did not seek medical attention for a resident in care. It was alleged Resident 1 (R1) sustained a fall and did not get timely medical attention. Continued 9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 21, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250903130423

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kristin Kontilis conducted a subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings. During today’s visit, LPA met with Ruth Grande, Executive Director and explained the reason for the visit. LPA initiated the investigation on 7/15/2024 from 12:28pm to 4:30pm. During the visit, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and residents, and obtained relevant documents. LPA also conducted additional interviews by phone on 7/29/2024 and 7/30/2024. On the allegation: Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings. It was alleged some of Resident 1 (R1)’s jewelry went missing from their room while R1 was in the hospital. R1 went to the hospital on 6/21/2024 and returned on 7/5/2024. R1 resides in the assisted living portion of the facility and does not have a diagnosis of dementia per their physician’s report. When R1 returned to their room on 7/5/2024, they went to their jewelry box to put their watch away and found a total of 11 items were missing, comprCDSS inspection report, September 25, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240711102809
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not assist resident to the correct room.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erika Miller (Miller) conducted an unannounced complaint visit on January 16, 2024. On June 7, 2024. LPA issued final findings on the allegations above. During the investigation, LPA Miller, toured the facility and interviewed staff on January 16, 2024, from 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. LPA also obtained and reviewed relevant documents. LPA met with Ruth Grande, administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. On the allegation: Staff did not assist resident to the correct room. It was alleged that caregivers mixed up two male residents in the memory care unit (Resident 1 and Resident 2). LPA interviewed R1’s visitor, who stated on January 6, 2024 they visited the facility and asked staff where R1 was. Staff replied R1 was in their room being changed. When the visitor arrived at R1’s room, visitor saw R2 being changed in R1’s room. Visitor stated they found R1 across the hall in R2’s room, sleeping. (Cont.on 9099-C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 7, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240110084949

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff handled resident roughly Facility staff verbally abused Resident(s) Facility did not accord Resident(s) with dignity Facility did not meet Resident's needs Facility failed to safeguard Resident(s) belongings
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/10/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Phillips conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to the facility above. LPA arrived at the facility, met with Christina Martinez, LVN, as the Administrator was not available, and announced the purpose of the visit. On the allegation: Facility Staff handled resident roughly. It is alleged by the Reporting Party (RP) that Facility Staff used forceful behavior towards residents who were clearly in physical pain. RP alleged Staff were overly aggressive with forcing resident(s) to sit down in specific places. Staff would forcefully take away items from residents. RP alleged that Staff members told RP they needed to use force with residents to get them to do what the Staff wants such as changing them, seating them, etc. Staff would allegedly stand in front of a seated resident so they couldn’t get up, grabbing the residents harshly allegedly causing bruising on 2 residents on their arms. RP additionally alleged that Staff wouldCDSS inspection report, October 10, 2023 · control 29-AS-20210709104343
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff not meeting the incontinence needs of the resident(s) in care. Resident sustained injury while in care. Staff does not communicate with authorized representative. Staff failed to give medications as prescribed. Staff is insufficient in numbers/knowledge to meet the residents needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 09/29/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Phillips conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to the facility above. LPA arrived at the facility, met with Licensed Vocational Nurse Jessica Hernandez as the Administrator was not available, and announced the purpose of the visit. On the allegation: Facility staff not meeting the incontinence needs of the resident(s) in care. It is alleged by the Reporting Party (RP) that a resident pressed the call button for incontinence assistance but was left for three hours in a soiled diaper as no Staff member responded. RP reported that they have observed old, soiled linens in the laundry basket of the resident. On 09/21/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted an initial complaint investigation visit to the facility above. Through interview of Staff members and residents, LPA observation, and record review the LPA found no evidence of the allegation that the facility Staff were not meeting the incontinence needs of the rCDSS inspection report, September 29, 2023 · control 29-AS-20220913135747
Facility Evaluation ReportAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedof Questionable Death, therefore the allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. A $500 immediate civil penalty is assessed today. The Administrator, Ruth Grande was informed that additional civil penalties might be assessed based on Health and Safety Code 1569.49(e). Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations, the following
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
of Questionable Death, therefore the allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. A $500 immediate civil penalty is assessed today. The Administrator, Ruth Grande was informed that additional civil penalties might be assessed based on Health and Safety Code 1569.49(e). Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations, the followingCDSS inspection report, February 15, 2023
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is in disrepair.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPAs) Mark Jeffries and Kristin Kontilis conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint investigation based on the above stated allegation. LPA met with Ruth Grande, Administrator and Luis Martinez, Maintenance Director and explained the purpose of the visit. Entrance interview conducted: LPAs conducted a physical tour of the facility to ensure health and safety precautions were met. At approximately 11:17 am, LPAs observed a sign posted on Elevator #1, located near the facility lobby in Assisted Living, stating the facility elevator is presently inoperable. During the visit, LPAs obtained various documents pertinent to the investigation. From 11:25 am to 2:30 pm, LPAs conducted interviews with staff and residents in care. Interviews conducted revealed that Administrator and Maintenance Director are working closely with the elevator vendor to rectify the issue of the in-operable elevators. Please continue to 9099-C, Pg 2. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 15, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230210144006

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 20 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
5
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
6
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
9
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
20
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(805) 967-1965
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Maravilla? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.