Mid-size home · Licensed for 13 · Atascadero
Park Place Assisted Living
7500 Portola Rd, Atascadero, CA 93422Licensed since 2021
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 13: a mid-size care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 13 residents
- Hospiceup to 8 residents
- Bedriddenup to 12 residents
Not on file: dementia approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 13 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 12 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 8.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 8 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Park Place Assisted Living: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$5,000a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,000likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$5,000this home
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living one bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
Shared room insteadAsknot on file
This home’s listed starting rate is for assisted living one bedroom. A shared room, if one is offered, may cost less — ask.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $5,000–$5,600
- $5,000
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,000–$9,150
- $7,500
Lines marked “Ask” are not in the totals.
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes19 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,500 to $10,000
19 homes like this within 15 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,500–$7,400.
- Garden View InnAtascadero · 0.4 mi · Mid-size home$4,950Listed on its own website · shared room · seen October 5, 2026
- Roses Assisted LivingAtascadero · 1.5 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Paso Robles Senior LivingPaso Robles · 9.6 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Annette LodgePaso Robles · 10 mi · Mid-size home$5,950Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Royal Home CarePaso Robles · 11 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Irene's Board & CarePaso Robles · 11 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- A Heavenly HomePaso Robles · 12 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Foothills Residential Care for the ElderlySan Luis Obispo · 12 mi · Small home$5,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Cuesta Rosa Senior ResidenceSan Luis Obispo · 12 mi · Mid-size home$10,000Listed on its own website · private room · seen October 5, 2026
- Vista Rosa Elder CareSan Luis Obispo · 13 mi · Mid-size home$7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Vista Rosita Elder CareSan Luis Obispo · 13 mi · Small home$7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Southbay Maxi CareLos Osos · 13 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- M & L South Bay Maxi CareLos Osos · 13 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sachele Senior Guest Home IIILos Osos · 14 mi · Small home$5,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Country Care HomePaso Robles · 14 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Chateau RoseSan Luis Obispo · 14 mi · Small home$7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Mission LodgePaso Robles · 14 mi · Mid-size home$6,250Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Monterey LodgePaso Robles · 14 mi · Mid-size home$6,250Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Welcome Home Residential Care for the ElderlySan Luis Obispo · 14 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living one bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
7500 Portola Rd, Atascadero, CA 93422Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #405850052 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 10 of 16 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 4 “Substantiated” and 2 “Unsubstantiated”.
20261 state visit · 1 document
Mar 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Leon arrived at 10:45am to conducted a 1 year annual visit to the facility above. LPA met with Back up to Administrator Leticia Ruiz and explained the purpose of the visit. A tour of the inside and outside of the facility was conducted with Administrator. The following was inspected and noted during the annual visit: Infection Control: The facility has a current Infection Control Plan. The facility has a sign in and out clipboard for visitors at entry with hand sanitizer.The bathrooms have toilet paper, paper towels, hand soap, and hand washing signs. The facility has EPA approved disinfectants spray and cleaners. The facility has a 30 day supply of PPE. Quarantined or isolated individuals will have meals and medication delivered to rooms. Staff are trained on infection control and the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). Physical Plant & Environment Safety: The facility has 10 bedroom/10 bathroom for residents, 3 common area restrooms with coded locked doors, kitchen, dining room, laundry room, activity room, code locked office with locked medication closet, currently occupying 10 residents with 14 staff of which 2 are administrators. The facility is clean, safe and sanitary. LPA was authorized to enter and inspect facility. The facility has dual smoke and carbon monoxide detectors with a sprinkler system. The lighting and lamps are sufficient for the use of the facility and for resident comfort. The facility kitchen is clean, safe and sanitary. Toilet, hand washing and bathing facilities are operational and secured grab bars are present. The showers have non-skid mats. The pathways are clear of any obstructions. Facility is well lit inside and outside for safety. Disinfectant, cleaning solutions and poisons are inaccessible to residents in care locked in basement, cleaning closet and laundry room. The facility has sufficient space inside and outside for activities and visiting. The facility has an enclosed courtyard for client use with plenty of shade gates are locked by a key fob which automatically open with fire alarms. The facility has telephone and internet service for resident use. Continued 809-C The facility has video surveillance in the common areas without voice or sound capability for privacy purposes. The flooring is going to be replaced due to peeling and lifting, LPA found no tripping hazards in the flooring on the tour, the staff peel away anything lifting and put gorilla tape over the flooring so it does not cause a hazard. Administrator will send incident report with details of when the repairs will start and end and the plan for residents when each room is being done. Operational Requirements: The facility has a current plan of operation on file. The Facility is operating in compliance with the granted fire clearance. The facility did not have proof of insurance at visit and will send copy to LPA. The facility is approved for a capacity of 13, with 13 Non-Ambulatory of which 12 may be bedridden. Hospice waiver is approved for 8. The facility is currently working on securing a fire clearance for delayed egress and secured coded locked gates for entry and exit, a this time it is not being utilized until the fire chef and company that is doing the install can met and go over it together then it will be granted by Fire for use. Staffing: The facility employes 13 staff of which 2 are certified Administrators. Staff records are kept confidential. Five Files reviewed had current 1st Aid/CPR, Personnel Records/Application, Health screening with TB results, Criminal Record statements, and Finger print clearance/Associations/exemptions. Administrator file was reviewed for Continuing Education requirements. Administrator Certificates expire 03/11/2028 and 08/27/2027. Personnel Records & Training: The facility keeps confidential files for each staff member. LPA reviewed 5 staff training records for Initial and/or Annual Training Requirements of 20 plus hours meeting 8 hours of dementia training with all subjects covered over a 3 year period, 4 hours of hospice care, postural supports and restricted health condition, and 8 hours of other training to include ADL's, resident characteristics, emergency preparedness policy and procedures, infection control requirements and Quarterly Disaster Drills. Staff handling medications had annual training of 8 hours of medication training. Hospice and Home Health provide training to staff for residents under those services and facility keeps records on file. Resident Records & Incident Reports: The facility keeps separate files on each resident confidentially. Five files were reviewed for signed Admission Agreements, Medical Assessments, LIC. 602A Physicians Report, ID and Emergency contact forms, Appraisal Needs and Services plans (ANS), TB results, Personal Rights, and Safeguard for personal property and valuables. Pre-Admission appraisals are conducted on perspective residents before accepting them into care. The Facility does not handle cash resources on residents in care. Facility does submit incident reports to the department when required. Continued 809-C Food Service: The facility handles and prepares food safely. The facility has 2 day perishables and 7 day non-perishables to meet the food service requirement. The freezer is kept at 0 degrees and the refrigeration is kept at 40 degrees or lower. All food is covered, stored and marked appropriately. Food, snacks and drinks are available when the residents want them. Emergency supply of food and water is available. Cleaning solutions and equipment are stored separately from food supplies. Kitchen areas are kept clean and free from litter, rodents, vermin and insects. Incidental Medical and Dental Services: Facility provides or assists in providing transportation to medical and dental appointments when needed. The facility uses the Medication Administration Record (MAR) along with the Centrally Stored Medication and Destruct Records (CSMDR). Medications are kept in a locked medication closet in office. Medication were checked for expiration, llabels were not altered and medication were stored in original containers. Administrator and Medication Technicians destroy medications by logging and taking to the pharmacy for destruction. Resident Rights Information: All require postings were posted in the common area of the facility. Personal rights, Rights to Resident/Family Council, Theft and Loss policy, and Non-discrimination notice. CCL Complaint poster and LTCO poster were posted in the common areas of facility. The current license along with CCL reports and PIN's were posted. Visitation policy is posted at entry. Internet and a device for residents use is provided to residents with confidentiality and privacy. Disaster Preparedness: The current emergency disaster forms were posted. The facility conducts quarterly disaster drills. The fire extinguishers was charged and last inspected July 28, 2025. Emergency exits and telephone numbers were posted. A set of keys is available for staff on all shifts to access full facility in an emergency. Residents with Special Health Needs: The facility does accept dementia residents in care. All items that could pose a danger, sharps, cleaners were locked or in accessible to residents in care. The facility does not currently have residents with oxygen. The facility has 5 hospice residents in care. Hospice care plans are kept on file and up to date. The facility currently has 1 resident receiving Home Health services. Home Health services records are kept on file. The facility does not currently have delayed egress, forms have been submitted to the department and fire for clearance. The facility has exiting door alarms. LPA conducted interviews with 2 residents and 2 staff. Exit interview conducted, deficiencies cited, copy of report and appeal rights printed for Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2026
20253 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 31, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Leon conducted a case management -Incident visit to the facility above. LPA met with Diana Barnhill Licensee/Administrator of the facility and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility and checked on the 10 residents in care. LPA requested the following records from the facility: Residents roster, Staff Roster, Staff Schedule for date of incident, copy of the video surveillance for 10/26/2025, 10 Residents care plans, Call pendants records for October 25th, 26th and 27th, and Copy of Staff 1 (S1)’s file for application, job description, mandated reporting, photo ID, CCL Clearance form, and training, as well as any remaining records not received from 10/27/2025 request. Licensee called LPA on Monday October 27, 2025, at 12:30pm to report an incident that happened on Sunday Oct. 26, 2025, around 1:30am-5:30am, Staff 1 (S1) on duty NOC caregiver text Licensee and Staff 2 (S2) that S1 was not feeling good and was leaving to go home. This text message was not read until after 5:15 am by S2, who immediately called the facility and got no answer called the Licensee, changed and headed over to the residence. The front door was found unlocked and all 10 Residents were found sleeping around 5:35am, Licensee arrived at 6:03pm and Staff 3 (S3) arrived before the start of S3’s 6am shift at 5:51am. The Licensee said company policy is for Staff to call and not to text when in an emergency. Continued 809-C LPA requested records from Licensee on 10/27/2025 after learning of the incident: Video Surveillance for 10/26/2025, Incident Report, SOC 341 sent to local law enforcement, Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) and CCL. S1’s full name, address and phone number, call pendant calls for 10/26/2025 for all residents in care, list of residents that get up during the night and a list of residents that need toileting or briefs changes during the night, if S1 worked in the Licensee’s other facility, in which S1 did, Job description for Caregiver on NOC shift and a copy of S1’s texts to Licensee and S2. The Licensee sent the Incident Report on Monday October 27, 2025, at 1:34pm to Community Care Licensing (CCL) which provided additional details. S1 text message Licensee and S2 at 1:21am and after reviewing the video surveillance S1 left the facility at 1:23am. The residents were alone in the facility from 1:23am to around 5:39am when S2 arrived. Staff checked on residents, a few of them needed to be changed and had been left soiled and wet. The Licensee tried to call and Text S1 with no response and S1 was terminated on 10/27/2025 for the neglect of 10 residents in care by leaving them alone in the facility. S2 verified the text came into S2's phone at 1:23am and S2 did not hear the text message then upon waking read the message and immediately called the facility with no answer, then proceeded to get dressed and drove straight over to the facility and arrived at 5:39am, door was unlocked, checked residents in care and all 10 were accounted for and sleeping. S2 watched the video surveillance which showed Resident 1 (R1) had gotten up out of bed and set off the floor alarm and proceeded to the dining room around 1:23am, S1 had just walked out the door at this time video shows S1 turned around and came back into the facility and redirected R1 to R1's room, S1 proceeded to leave out the door again, front door unlocked and left the facility with 10 residents in care alone until 5:39am. S2 watched the full video and said no other residents got up from 1:30am- 5:39am when S2 arrived at the facility. Licensee watched the videos and confirmed the times of the incident. Continued 809-C LPA attempted to call S1 on 10/31/2025 at 8:49am the phone had restrictions set and would not accept LPA's call, LPA text on 10/31/2025 at 8:58am with a picture of business card and asking S1 to call LPA due to having restrictions set on phone was not able to call or leave a message. LPA attempted to call again on 10/31/2025 at 9:05am the phone number on file and was not able to get through due to restrictions being set on the phone number. LPA attempted 1 more call to S1's phone at 10:02am and the call would not go thorough. Exit interview conducted, deficiency cited, civil penalty assessed, copy of report and appeal rights printed for Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 3, 2025
(a)Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, ...competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. ...This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, video surveillance, incident reports, the Licensee failed to comply with the regulation above S1 left shift at 1:23am leaving 10 residents alone for over 4 hours which possess an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2025
Plan of correction: The Licensee agreed to schedule adequate staff coverage and send schedules to CCL for the next 90days. Train facility personnel in Facility Policy and Procedures for calling out, leaving the facility, and Cont. below contact names and numbers to call when an emergency need arises, send proof of training and LIC 500 with all current staff listed.
Sep 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee did not ensure that the facility obtained fire clearance and approval of a delayed egress device on facility door.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Leon conducted a 10 day complaint visit to the facility above. LPA met with Administrator/Licensee Diana Barnhill and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested the following records: Staff Roster, Staff Schedule for August 2025, Resident roster and copy of video surveillance of the kitchen area on 08/26/2025. LPA interviewed staff around 10:30am, toured the kitchen, dining, took photographs of the front exiting doors, and observed the secured perimeter patio to have fencing all around courtyard with a magentic locking mechanicsm on the gates around patio with a magnetic key phobe for opening gates. On the allegation: Licensee did not ensure that the facility obtained fire clearance and approval of a delayed egress device on facility door. The facility was originally licensed on 03/16/2021 and at that time the front door had key coded exit, and the facility courtyard was a fenced secured perimeter with a magnetic key phobe on gates. The fire clearance was reviewed and this was not indicated as approved. Cont. 9099-C Substantiated LPA De Leon spoke with Administrator and provided the fire department with a updated clearance for approval or denial. The facility had a new company come out to the facility and install delayed egress on the front entry/exiting door and it is not currently working as the Licensee is waiting for the approval from Fire to be able to use the device. On 08/26/2025 Witness 1 (W1) visited the facility and was not able to leave until the staff put the code in the front door to exit. W1 said the front door has a sliding lock located towards the top of the door that is used by sliding it over to lock. The door knob still has a key coded lock on it and it locks from the inside to go outside, the staff would need to come to the door with the code to let someone exit. The fire department has not granted or denied the delayed egress inspection request at this time. LPA has spoken to administrator and let them know the door knobs will need to be removed and a normal locking door knob placed until the fire department can come out to inspect and approve the delayed egress. The front entering door can remain locked at night and overnight for safety but can not have day time locks or delayed egress until it is approved by the fire department and sent to CCL for final approval on the license. Based on the evidence this allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted, deficiency cited, civil penalty assessed, copy of report and appeal rights printed for Administrator. LPA watched the video surveillance on the date of 08/26/2025 around 10:00am and 1 staff was on break sitting at the bar counter between the kitchen and dining room. At no time did a resident enter the kitchen area. According to the staff there was 3 staff on duty, 2 caregivers helping residents and one housekeeper, the housekeeper was on break and if needed would have re-directed any residents that would have tried to go in the kitchen area at this time. Witness 1 (W1) stated the sharps and knives drawer was unlocked and accessible to residents in care. After watching the video surveillance the housekeeper was siting between the kitchen and the dining area and no residents had attempted to go into the kitchen area, the knife drawer was unlocked with a staff in the immediate area making it inaccessible to residents in care. Staff were directed to lock the drawer and did so at that time. Based on the staff being in the immediate area and no residents entering the kitchen area this allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and copy of report printed for Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250827130039
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87705(f)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 4, 2025
(f) Licensees that lock exterior doors or perimeter fence gates...(2)The licensee shall ensure that the fire clearance includes approval of locked exterior doors or perimeter fence gates... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on records review and observation the licesee did not comply with the regulation above the front entry/exit door has an automatic lock when exiting the front door and a sliding lock at the top of the door for locking at night which poses an immediate safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2025
Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to remove all locks off of the entry/exit door and put a manual knob and lock for overnight until the delayed egress can be approved by the fire department, read and review regulation 87705 and train staff provide proof of training to CCL.
Mar 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Leon arrived at 12:35pm to conducted a 1 year annual visit to the facility above. LPA met with Administrator Diana Barnhill and explained the purpose of the visit. A tour of the inside and outside of the facility was conducted with Administrator. The following was inspected and noted during the annual visit: Infection Control: The facility has a current Infection Control Plan. The facility has a sign in and out clipboard for visitors at entry with hand sanitizer. The bathrooms have toilet paper, paper towels, hand soap, and hand washing signs. The facility has EPA approved disinfectants spray and cleaners. The facility has a 30 day supply of PPE. Quarantined or isolated individuals will have meals and medication delivered to rooms. Physical Plant & Environment Safety: The facility is a 10 bedroom with 10 bathrooms, 3 common restrooms, kitchen, dining room, laundry room, activity room, locked office with medication locked closet currently occupying 12 residents and employs 11 staff. The facility is clean, safe and sanitary. LPA was authorized to enter and inspect facility. The facility has dual smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. The lighting and lamps are sufficient for the use of the facility and for resident comfort. The facility kitchen is clean, safe and sanitary. Toilet, hand washing and bathing facilities are operational and secured grab bars are present. The showers have non-skid mats. The pathways are clear of any obstructions. Facility is well lit inside and outside for safety. Disinfectant, cleaning solutions and poisons are inaccessible to residents in care locked in basement, cleaning closet and laundry rooms. The facility has sufficient space inside and outside for activities and visiting. The facility has an enclosed courtyard for client use with plenty of shade. The facility has telephone and internet service for resident use. The facility has video surveillance in the common areas without voice or sound capability for privacy purposes. Staffing: LPA will return at a later date to review staffing records. Personnel Records & Training: LPA will return at a later date to review personnel records and training. Resident Records & Incident Reports: LPA will return at a later date to review resident records. Continued 809-C Operational Requirements: The facility has a current plan of operation on file. The Facility is operating in compliance with the granted fire clearance. The facility is approved for a capacity of 13 with 13 Non-Ambulatory of which 12 may be bedridden. Hospice approved for 8. Food Service: The facility handles and prepares food safely. The facility has 2 day perishables and 7 day non-perishables to meet the food service requirement. The freezer is kept at 0 degrees and the refrigeration is kept at 40 degrees or lower. All food is covered, stored and marked appropriately. Food, snacks and drinks are available when the residents want them. Emergency supply of food and water is available. Cleaning solutions and equipment are stored separately from food supplies. Kitchen areas are kept clean and free from litter, rodents, vermin and insects. Kitchen staff are observed for personal hygiene and food sanitation practices. Incidental Medical and Dental Services: LPA will return at a later date to review Incidental Medical and Dental services. Resident Rights Information: All require postings were posted in the common area of the facility. Personal rights, Rights to Resident Council, Theft and Loss policy, and Non-discrimination notice. CCL Complaint poster and LTCO poster were posted in the common areas of facility. The current license along with CCL reports and PIN's were posted. Visitation policy is posted at entry. Internet and a device for residents use is provided to resident with confidentiality and privacy. Disaster Preparedness: The current emergency disaster forms were posted. The facility conducts quarterly disaster drills. The fire extinguishers was charged and last inspected 08/04/2024. Emergency exits and telephone numbers were posted. A set of keys is available for staff on all shifts to access full facility in an emergency. Residents with Special Health Needs: The facility does accept dementia residents in care. All items that could pose a danger, sharps, cleaners were locked or in accessible to residents in care. The facility does not currently have residents with oxygen. The facility has 4 hospice residents in care. Hospice care plans are kept on file and up to date. The facility currently has 2 residents receiving Home Health services. Home Health services records are kept on file. The facility does not have delayed egress. The facility has a key code on the front exterior door which is not being used at this time. Administrator has ordered and awaiting new delayed egress doors, a pending fire clearance is awaiting the completed work. The facility has exiting door alarms. LPA will conduct interviews at a later date. Exit interview conducted and copy of report printed for Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2025
The state marks this report as 7 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20244 state visits · 5 documents
Oct 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not give a resident sufficient notice of rate increases. Facility is not following a resident's care plan.
At 9:30am on10/07/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries conducted a subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings on this investigation. LPA met with BOM, Letica Ruiz-Guerrero and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, LPA De Leon conducted an initial visit on 12/28/2023 from 12:30pm to 2:10pm, where LPA interviewed staff and residents and requested documents. LPA conducted additional resident and staff interviews on 7/22/2024 from 10:15am to 3:15pm on another complaint with a similar allegation. Additional interviews with witness, Administrator and staff were conducted on 10/3/2024. On the allegation: Facility did not give a resident sufficient notice of rate increases. It was alleged R1 was not given proper 60 days written notice for the increase, as the notice was provided 11/20/2023, less than 60 days before 1/1/2024. In August 2023, R1’s rent was originally $7000 per month. LPA reviewed a text message dated 11/21/2023 from the Administrator to R1’s responsible party stating they would be sending a 2-day notice “by Monday” that includes a rate increase to add a second overnight staff to provide supervision at a cost of $4880 per month. CONTINUED on 9099-C Substantiated The texts states it will be a second fulltime staff to supervise R1 between 10pm to 6am. The text states the increase would start 2 days after receiving the notice. The text states November would be prorated, December’s rent would be $11,880 (the original $7000 rent plus the one on one fee), and starting 1/1/2024 it would be $13,068 per month. The written rate increase notice reviewed, dated 11/20/2023, states the rate as of 12/1/2023 would be $11,800 per month and as of 1/1/2024 would be $12,980 due to a 10% increase. Based on the information, the facility did not give sufficient notice of rate increases for January 2024. Another concern brought forth was that the facility wanted to increase R1’s rent starting in January by more than 10%. However, Title 22 regulations and health and safety code currently do not have increase caps for RCFEs. Based on the information obtained, the allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. On the allegation: Facility is not following a resident's care plan. It was alleged that R1 required a one-on-one staff overnight for wandering behavior, so the facility increased R1’s monthly fee in order to provide additional staff in the facility. However, it was alleged the facility did not provide additional staff following the rate increase. A witness stated they did a “stakeout” at the facility from 10pm to 6am and did not see any additional staff go into the facility. LPA reviewed a text message dated 11/21/2023 from the Administrator to R1’s responsible party stating they would be sending a 2-day notice that includes a rate increase to add a second overnight staff to provide supervision at a cost of $4880 per month. The texts states it will be a second fulltime staff to supervise R1 between 10pm to 6am. The written increase states an additional $4800 would be added for “one on one supervision.” Administrator stated R1 was very aggressive and was up most of the night and would go through the kitchen refrigerator and pantry, and had other aggressive behaviors. Administrator stated the one NOC staff could not attend to round on the other residents and properly supervise R1, so they added an extra staff overnight. Administrator stated typically the PM shift stayed an extra 1-2 hours to help the NOC staff, and then Administrator came in around 11pm-12am and stayed until 4-5am after R1 went to bed. Administrator stated R1 did not need a one on one to watch them every second, but rather they just needed a second staff overnight to provide adequate supervision to R1. CONTINUED on LIC9099-C Facility charting notes for December 2023 were reviewed. There were notes from the AM and NOC shifts. NOC shift notes stated on 12/19/2023, R1 was up when the staff got to work, but went to bed at 12:30am and stayed asleep. On 12/20/2023, the notes state R1 came out of their room at 10:45pm to eat dinner, went back to their room at 2am and stayed there. On 12/21/2023, the notes state R1 came out of their room around 10pm and 10:20pm looking for a particular staff. R1 went to their room but kept coming out all night. On 12/22/2023, the notes state R1 was awake when they got to work but went to bed at 11:30pm and stayed asleep. On 12/24/2023, the notes state R1 stayed awake, came out of their room to eat again, and went to sleep at 2am and stayed asleep. Based on the investigation, the written two-day increase for R1 states specifically “one on one supervision,” which was not provided based on Administrator’s interview. Therefore this allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. Exit interview, deficiencies cited on 9099-D, report given, appeal rights given. On 8/25/2023 they were invoiced for a medication that was $33.97, and wrote a check on 9/2/2023. On 10/1/2023 they wrote a check to cover medication gummies at $27.93 and briefs at $44.50. Administrator confirmed R1’s responsible party did state the VA would pay for the medications and briefs, however the Administrator stated they were unable to access the VA. Administrator stated they told R1’s responsible party that as their responsible party/POA they could access the VA on R1’s behalf and provide the items. However the items were never provided, so Administrator purchased the items for reimbursement to ensure R1 had the medication and care items they needed. Although, the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. On the allegation: Facility staff yell at residents. It was alleged a staff yelled at a resident they were not getting any lunch. Multiple residents interviewed stated they were treated “fine,” “well,” “very well,” and said there was no yelling or disrespect. One resident stated a staff was disrespectful. Staff stated they never yell at residents, and treat residents with respect. Administrator stated staff have never yelled or been disrespectful, and they would not tolerate that behavior from staff. A credible witness was interviewed who stated they had never witnessed or heard of staff yelling at the residents, but had consistently heard and/or witnessed staff are rude or mean to residents. Witness indicated one resident stated some staff are kinder than others. Administrator stated one resident does not want to be at the facility so they complain about a lot of things. Based on the information obtained, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time, and staff’s disrespectful behavior will be addressed on complaint 29-AS-20240715084408. On the allegation: Facility staff did not ensure that a resident's clothing was free of stains. It was alleged R1 spilled food on a new jacket, and it had not been washed but R1 continued to wear the jacket. Administrator confirmed that R1 had very aggressive behaviors, and often refused care verbally and by hitting and kicking staff. Administrator stated R1 had one jacket and wore it often. Administrator stated they tried to wash the jacket but R1 would refuse to allow staff to take it off or launder it, in similar way that R1 refused showers. One time, R1 went outside in the heat and removed their jacket and left it on the patio, so the housekeeper took it and washed it. A credible witness interviewed stated they have not heard of any issues regarding laundry, and have not observed any stained clothes. Administrator stated R1’s behaviors were conveyed to R1’s responsible party. Based on the information obtained, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview, report given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2024 · control 29-AS-20231227101251
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569,655(a) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 21, 2024
1569.655(a)…the licensee shall provide no less than 60 days' prior written notice to the residents or the residents' representatives setting forth the amount of the increase, the reason for the increase, and a general description of the additional costs…This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above when they issued a general rate increase with less than 60 days notice, which posed a potential personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2024
Plan of correction: POC: Administrator agrees to submit a written statement of acknowledgement and understanding of 1569.655 by 10/21/2024.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87507(e) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 21, 2024
87507(f) Admission Agreements. The licensee shall comply with all applicable terms and conditions set forth in the admission agreement, including all modifications and attachments. This requirement is not met as evidenced by:Based on interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited when they stated in writing R1 would have one on one care and did not provide it, which posed a potential personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2024
Plan of correction: POC: Administrator agrees to refund R1’s one on one care charges, since one on one care was not provided. Administrator will send proof by 10/21/2024.
Oct 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not treat residents with respect
At 9:30am on 10/07/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffrues conducted a subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings on this investigation. LPA met with BOM, Letica Ruiz-Guerrero and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, LPA De Leon conducted an initial visit on 7/22/2024 from 10:15am to 3:15pm, where LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and residents and requested documents. Additional interviews with witness, Administrator and staff were conducted on 10/3/2024. On the allegation: Staff did not treat residents with respect. It was alleged residents cry due to being yelled at by staff. Multiple residents interviewed stated they were treated “fine,” “well,” “very well,” and said there was no yelling or disrespect. One resident stated a staff was disrespectful. Staff stated they never yell at residents, and treat residents with respect. Administrator stated staff have never yelled or been disrespectful, and they would not tolerate that behavior from staff. A credible witness was interviewed who stated they had never witnessed or heard of staff yelling at the residents, but had consistently heard and/or witnessed staff are rude or mean to residents. CONTINUED on LIC9099-C Substantiated Witness indicated one resident stated some staff are kinder than others. Administrator stated one resident does not want to be at the facility so they complain about a lot of things. Based on the information obtained, the allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. Exit interview, deficiencies cited on 9099-D, report given, appeal rights given. If they were positive asymptomatic, they were allowed to work with positive residents in alignment with local health department guidelines. Administrator stated they contact public health for every COVID-19 case or exposure for guidance, and take infection control seriously. No infection control issues were observed during the visits. Based on the information obtained, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview, report given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240715084408
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 21, 2024
87468.1(a)(1) Personal Rights. Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above when residents were not treated with respect, which posed a potential personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2024
Plan of correction: POC: Administrator agrees to hold personal rights from a third-party vendor for all staff and submit proof of completion by 10/21/2024.
Jul 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate food service Staff did not provide a comfortable temperature for residents
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Leon conducted a 10-day complaint visit to the facility above. LPA met with Diana Barnhill Administrator/Licensee and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested the following documentation: Staff Roster with telephone numbers, Staff Schedule for 07/2024, Resident Roster, a new and an old copy of Resident 1 (R1) LIC 602A Physicians report, 5 weeks of resident food menus, and any residents special diets. Administrator provided all records except no residents are currently on any physican precribed special diet. LPA toured the facility kitchen, food supply in refrigerator/freezer, food pantry, additonal food stored in basement refirgerators, 3 resident rooms and the secured courtyard. LPA conducted interviews with staff at 11:15am, 11:35am, 12:20pm and 12:27pm. LPA conducted interviews with residents at 12:45pm, 1:00pm, and 1:10pm. Continued 9099-C Unsubstantiated On the allegation: Staff did not provide adequate food service. LPA toured the kitchen, pantry and additional food it the basement refrigerators. LPA observed staff serve lunch to residents in the dining room, the residents were eating and ate what was provided on the plates. The meal served today was a sandwich, chips, pickles, and Jell-O with fruit punch and water, which meets requirements and the supply of food meets the regulation requirements of two day perishables and seven day non-perishable. LPA interviewed staff and residents which revealed the facility provides 3 meals per day, 2 snacks, and dessert. Interviews reveal food, beverages and snacks are available when the residents want them. Resident interviews revealed the food is not great but it is not bad either, would say it is ok. Resident interviews revealed resident would like to have a residents choice on the menu and the menu should be changed up so it is not repeated as often. LPA reviewed the residents menus and the food being served differs from day to day. Resident interviews stated they would prefer more options of bread being offered. Administrator stated the facility will provide food the residents like, and if residents tell the staff/Administrator what they want or need the facility will look into it so they can supply it. Residents interviews revealed the portion size of meals and meals themselves are adequate. Based on the evidence this allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. On the allegation: Staff did not provide a comfortable temperature for residents. LPA toured the facility, each resident room has its own air-conditioning unit. Resident interviews revealed the facility is not cold or hot, the temperature is fine and can be adjusted if needed. The staff interviews revealed the facility air-conditioning units are working properly and can be changed as needed if and when the resident wants it. LPA observed on visit the facility outside temperature was at 86 degrees, a warm day and the facility temperature was very comfortable not hot or cold inside. Based on the evidence this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and copy of report printed for Administrator/Licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 22, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240715084408
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Jun 28, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure an adequate supply of food is maintained and accessible at the facility. Staff are not adhering to food service requirements.
On 06/28/2024, at 10:00am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries arrived unannouced to the facility to deliver final findings to both allegations to this complaint. LPA met with Administrator Diana Barnhill, announced who he is and the reason for the visit. As to the allegation of, “Licensee does not ensure an adequate supply of food is maintained and accessible at the facility.” It was alleged that on 09/20/23, and 10/11 and 12/2023 the facility did not have sufficient food for residents and fresh fruit is not available to residents. It was discovered through documentation, grocery receipts, observations and interviews that on 10/23/23, LPA Jeffries conducted interviews of 6 or 12 Residents (R1, 2, 3, etc…) residing at the facility, R1-R6 all stated that they can request food or snacks at any time and have never been denied food or snacks at this facility. Interviews of Staff 1-4 (S1, S2, and S3) on 10/23/23, all stated that they provide residents with snacks twice a day and whenever requested and provide 3 meals per day. All stated that they have never denied any resident food at any time. CONTINUED on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated All stated that one resident would take one bite of fruit then take another fruit and bite it without finishing fruit, which required fruit to be available upon request. All stated that there is always enough food supply, all 4 staff stated they have been trained in preparing meals for residents. Interview of Administrator on October 23, 2023 stated that the facility always has food, 3 meals a day, two specific snack times and pantry for “on request” snacks, Administrator added that due to confusion, wandering, and sundowning behavior of one Resident, the fresh fruits and all snacks are available for residents on request. Administrator stated at least two staff are on duty at all times to provided resident request. On 10/23/23, LPA Jeffries observed more than 2 days of perishable foods and more than 7 days of non-perishable foods on hand at the facility, LPA took photographs to document food supply. On 10/23/23 LPA Jeffries collected and reviewed facility grocery receipts from September to October 2023. Receipts for grocery items that were delivered to the facility show; on 09/05/23 Costco $197.31, 09/07/23 Costco $156.52, 09/11/23 Food4Less $143.81, 09/12/23 Costco $198.17, 09/14/23 Food4Less $112.26, 09/17/23 Costco $129.80, 09/18/23 Grocery Outlet $118.88, 09/22/23 Costco $163.48, 09/26/23 Vons $215.74, 09/27/23 Food4Less $155.78, 10/03/23 Costco $138.16, 10/04/23 Food4Less $106.09, 10/04/23 Food4Less $101.19, 10/06/23 Costco $164.23, 10/08/23 Food4Less $234.30, 10/10/23 Vons $191.81, 10/10/23 Food4Less $84.90, 10/10/23 Costco $75.03, 10/11/23 Food4Less $85.26, 10/12/23 Costco $343.13, and 10/16/23 Food4Less $209.26. ($3114.03 + $1930.25 = Total of $5044.28 spent in 45-day period) Of the receipts that were not delivery to the facility receipts during this time frame were as follows; 10/17/23 Smart and Final $120.59, 10/17/23 Grocery Outlet $143.43, 10/17/23 Vons $304.28, 10/20/23 Wall Mart $422.50, 10/20/23 Grocery Outlet $292.07, and unverifiable date Costco $647.38. Collectively, all receipts reviewed between the dates of 09/05/23 and 10/20/23 show an average of grocery shopping every 1.7 days at $112.10 per every day for 45 days on average in the time frame from 09/05/23 through 10/20/23. LPA noted that observations on 10/23/23 show crackers, cookies, mini doughnuts, potato chips, and assorted snack foods were stocked in pantry, fresh fruits were on the counter in the kitchen area visible to residents, and ice cream bars, and ice cream were stocked in freezers available to residents upon request. At this time, there is not enough evidence to support the allegation of, “Licensee does not ensure an adequate supply of food is maintained and accessible at the facility.” and is unsubstantiated at this time. CONTINUED on LIC9099-C As to the allegation of, “Staff are not adhering to food service requirements.” It was alleged that the facility was using unsafe food handling methods regarding cross contamination of meats. It was discovered through observations, documentation, training records, and interviews that on 10/23/23 LPA Jeffries conducted interviews of S1-S3. All 3 staff stated they have been trained in preparing meals for residents. All three staff stated that they had their initial 40 hours of training that included meal preparation. S1-S3 all denied any cross contamination of foods while preparing meals at this facility. On 10/23/2023, LPA Jeffries interviewed R1-R7, who all stated, they like the food at this facility. All stated that they get snacks and 3 cooked meals per day. All stated they have never had an issue with the food service at this facility. On 10/23/2023, LPA Jeffries observed more than 2 days of perishable foods and more than 7 days of non-perishable foods on hand for at least 13 residents and staff. At this time there is not enough evidence to support the allegation of, “Staff are not adhering to food service requirements.” and is unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview, report read, and report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 28, 2024 · control 29-AS-20231016094648
Mar 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Leon arrived at 10:30am to conducted a 1 year annual visit to the facility above. LPA met with Administrator Diana Barnhill and explained the purpose of the visit. A tour of the inside and outside of the facility was conducted with Administrator. The following was inspected and noted during the annual visit: Infection Control: The facility has a current Infection Control Plan. The facility has a sign in and out clipboard for visitors at entry with hand sanitizer.The bathrooms have toilet paper, paper towels, hand soap, and hand washing signs. The facility has EPA approved disinfectants spray and cleaners. The facility has a 30 day supply of PPE. Quarantined or isolated individuals will have meals and medication delivered to rooms. Staff are trained on infection control and the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). All trash cans and waste baskets have tight fitting covers. Physical Plant & Environment Safety: The facility is a 10 bedroom with 10 bathrooms, 3 common restrooms, kitchen, dining room, laundry room, activity room, locked office with medication locked closet currently occupying 13 residents and employs 12 staff. The facility is clean, safe and sanitary. LPA was authorized to enter and inspect facility. The facility has dual smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. The lighting and lamps are sufficient for the use of the facility and for resident comfort. The facility kitchen is clean, safe and sanitary. Toilet, hand washing and bathing facilities are operational and secured grab bars are present. The showers have non-skid mats. The pathways are clear of any obstructions. Facility is well lit inside and outside for safety. Disinfectant, cleaning solutions and poisons are inaccessible to residents in care locked in basement, cleaning closet and laundry rooms. The facility has sufficient space inside and outside for activities and visiting. The facility has an enclosed courtyard for client use with plenty of shade. The facility has telephone and internet service for resident use. The facility has video surveillance in the common areas without voice or sound capability for privacy purposes. Continued 809-C Operational Requirements: The facility has a current plan of operation on file. The Facility is operating in compliance with the granted fire clearance. The facility has current liability insurance and expires on 09/28/2024. The facility is approved for a capacity of 13 with 13 Non-Ambulatory of which 12 may be bedridden. Hospice approved for 8. Staffing: The facility employes 11 staff and 1 Administrators. Staff records are kept confidential. Files reviewed had current 1st Aid/CPR, Personnel Records/Application, Health screening with TB results, Criminal Record statements, and Finger print clearance/Associations/exemptions. Administrator file was reviewed for Continuing Education requirements and current Administrator Certificate. Administrator Certificate expired 08/2023 waiting on renewal process. Personnel Records & Training: The facility keeps confidential files for each staff member. LPA reviewed 5 staff training records for Initial and/or Annual Training Requirements of 20 plus hours meeting 8 hours of dementia training with all subjects covered over a 3 year period, 4 hours of hospice care, postural supports and restricted health condition, and 8 hours of other training to include ADL's, resident characteristics, emergency preparedness policy and procedures, infection control requirements and Quarterly Disaster Drills. Staff handling medications had annual training of 8 hours of medication training. Hospice and Home Health provide training to staff for residents under those services and facility keeps records on file. Resident Records & Incident Reports: The facility keeps separate files on each resident confidentially. Five files were reviewed for signed Admission Agreements, Medical Assessments, LIC. 602A Physicians Report, ID and Emergency contact forms, Appraisal Needs and Services plans (ANS), TB results, Personal Rights, and Safeguard for personal property and valuables. Pre-Admission appraisals are conducted on perspective residents before accepting them into care. The Facility does not handle cash resources on residents in care. Facility does submit incident reports to the department when required. Food Service: The facility handles and prepares food safely. The facility has 2 day perishables and 7 day non-perishables to meet the food service requirement. The freezer is kept at 0 degrees and the refrigeration is kept at 40 degrees or lower. All food is covered, stored and marked appropriately. Food, snacks and drinks are available when the residents want them. Emergency supply of food and water is available. Cleaning solutions and equipment are stored separately from food supplies. Kitchen areas are kept clean and free from litter, rodents, vermin and insects. Kitchen staff are observed for personal hygiene and food sanitation practices. Continued 809-C Incidental Medical and Dental Services: Facility provides or assists in providing transportation to medical and dental appointments when needed. The facility uses the Medication Administration Record (MAR) along with the Centrally Stored Medication and Destruct Records (CSMDR). Medications are kept in a locked medication closet in office. Medication were checked for expiration. Medication labels were not altered and medication were stored in original containers. Administrator and Medication Technicians destroy medications by logging and taking to the pharmacy for destruction. Resident Rights Information: All require postings were posted in the common area of the facility. Personal rights, Rights to Resident Council, Theft and Loss policy, and Non-discrimination notice. CCL Complaint poster and LTCO poster were posted in the common areas of facility. The current license along with CCL reports and PIN's were posted. Visitation policy is posted at entry. Internet and a device for residents use is provided to resident with confidentiality and privacy. Disaster Preparedness: The current emergency disaster forms were posted. The facility conducts quarterly disaster drills. The fire extinguishers was charged and last inspected 08/04/2023. Emergency exits and telephone numbers were posted. A set of keys is available for staff on all shifts to access full facility in an emergency. Residents with Special Health Needs: The facility does accept dementia residents in care. All items that could pose a danger, sharps, cleaners were locked or in accessible to residents in care. The facility does not currently have residents with oxygen. The facility has 3 hospice residents in care. Hospice care plans are kept on file and up to date. The facility currently has 2 residents receiving Home Health services. Home Health services records are kept on file. The facility does not have delayed egress. The facility has a key coded exit on the front exterior door. The facility has exiting door alarms. LPA conducted interviews with 2 residents and 2 staff. Exit interview conducted and copy of report printed for Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2024
The state marks this report as 15 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 1, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide medications as prescribed. Staff did not assist with medications refills in a timely manner.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Leon conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility above to deliver final findings. LPA met with Care Staff and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA spoke with Administrator/Licensee by phone and LPA will have staff sign report. LPA De Leon conducted the initial 10-day complaint visit to the facility on 05/22/2023, conducted interviews at 10:00am, reviewed records and requested copies of records. LPA De Leon interviewed witness at 4:54pm on 05/22/2023. On 05/23/2023 LPA De Leon received additional medication records. LPA De Leon reviewed all medication records on 11/18/2023 and requested additional records. LPA De Leon reviewed additional records on 11/20/23, 11/22/2023 and 11/27/2023. On the allegation: Staff did not provide medications as prescribed. LPA De Leon reviewed Medications records for R1 which revealed 2 medications Timolol and Latanoprost were not being ordered monthly. Continued 9099-C Substantiated Medication Timolol Mal Sol 0.5% OP 15ml bottle expired approximately 1 year after order date according to the Pharmacy Model Drug. The facility Centrally Stored Medication and Destruct Record (CSMDR) showed Timolol medication logged in for the months of April, July, November of 2022 and February, March of 2023. The facility Medication Administrator Record (MAR) shows medication Timolol listed from April 2022-March 2023 being given daily in 1 eye 2x’s per day as prescribed by the doctor. The Timolol medication ordered in July 2022 and then ordered in November of 2022 would not have provided enough medication to fill the requirements of the prescription order of 1 eye 2x’s per day. The Medication Latanoprost Sol 0.005% 2.5ml bottle needed to be discarded 6 weeks after the bottle was opened according to the Pharmacy Model Drug. The facility CSMDR record showed Latanoprost logged in for the months of May, June- 2x’s, July of 2022 and February, March 2023. The facility MAR showed the medication Latanoprost given in 1 eye 1 time per day from April 2022-March 2023 as prescribed by the doctor. The Latanoprost 2.5 ml bottle will last approximately 30 days according to the Pharmacy Model Drug and the medication needs to be discarded 6 weeks after opening the bottle. Medication Latanoprost would have needed to be ordered and logged on to the CSMDR every 6 weeks to be able to fill the doctor’s order and not be expired while using. The pharmacy Model Drug payment invoices showed there were no re-orders for Latanoprost in August, September, October, November, or December of 2022 and January of 2023. LPA reviewed the medication orders/invoices from Pharmacy Model Drung which showed Timolol was ordered on 04/07/22, 07/25/22, 11/15/22, 02/24/2023, 03/18/2023, and the medication showed Latanoprost was ordered on 04/06/22, 05/17/22, 06/20/22, 07/25/22, 02/24/23, and on 03/18/23. Based on the evidence this allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. On the allegation: Staff did not assist with medications refills in a timely manner. LPA reviewed the medication order/invoices from the Pharmacy Model Drug which showed medications were not ordered monthly. The medication Timolol was not ordered in the months of May, June, August, September, October, December of 2022, and January of 2023. The medication Latanoprost was not ordered in August, September, October, November, December of 2022, and January of 2023. The medications were not being ordered to fill the doctor’s prescriptions orders or enough of the medication Latanoprost for it to not to be expired while using. Based on the evidence this allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted, deficiency issued, copy of report and appeal rights printed for Licensee/Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 1, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230517162207
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 8, 2023
(a)...The plan...provide assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following:(4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review the licensee did not comply with the regulation above R1’s medications was not being reordered as often as needed and one medication was being used after it expired which poses a immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 1, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator agreed to hold staff training for all staff handling medications on regulation 87465, CCL Medication Guide, and facility policy and procedures for handling and reordering medications, audit medications for expiration dates, provide an up-to-date LIC 500 with training documents and staff signatures to CCL.
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 6 documents
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Mar 2, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff sexually assaulted resident in care. Facility staff spoke inappropriately to resident in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Darlene Chavez conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Diana Barnhill, Licensee/Administrator, and explained the reason for the visit. On 01/09/2023, the Department received a complaint regarding Staff #1 (S1) sexually assaulting Resident #1 (R1). It was also alleged that S1 made inappropriate comments towards R1. R1 reported that while S1 was changing them, S1 inserted their finger into R1’s rectum, pulled pubic hair out, held it in front of R1’s face and said, “I pulled this out of your butt.” S1 then told R1 to “shut up.” Staff reported that R1 had dementia, but R1’s statement was concerning because R1 reported it to several people and it was consistent. The case was assigned to the Atascadero Police Department for further investigation as case #23-0052. S1 was suspended from work pending the investigation. The complaint was referred to the Community Care Licensing Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to Investigator Maria Barragan. Unsubstantiated On 01/11/2023, from 12:00pm to 1:11pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Darlene Chavez conducted an unannounced 24-hour complaint investigation visit to the facility. LPA Chavez met with Diana Barnhill, Licensee/Administrator, and explained the purpose of the visit. The LPA interviewed the Licensee/Administrator, observed Resident #1 (R1) and requested documents pertinent to the investigation. The LPA determined further investigation was needed and informed the Licensee/Administrator the Investigations Branch (IB) Investigator Maria Barragan would continue the investigation. On 01/24/2023, from approximately 11:07am to 1:22pm, Investigator Barragan and Atascadero Police Department Detective Craig Martineau conducted interviews with R1’s resident representative, staff, and the Licensee/Administrator; from approximately 1:47pm to 2:35pm, Investigator Barragan conducted interviews with residents and staff; on 02/02/2023, at approximately 5:18pm, with R1’s resident representative, and on 02/14/2023, from approximately 12:05pm to 1:27pm, with S1 and Staff #2 (S2). Additionally, Investigator Barragan reviewed the Atascadero Police Department Report #23-0052, and facility file documents, including the SOC341 Suspected Elder Abuse Report, related to R1. According to the Atascadero Police Report, on 01/08/2023, at approximately 10:45am, Officer Robert Hammer was dispatched to the facility due to a sexual assault report filed. The report indicated R1 had disclosed that during nighttime hours on 01/07/2023, a staff had inserted their finger into R1’s rectum. The officer conducted interviews with the Licensee/Administrator and R1. R1 was not able to identify the location where the incident occurred. R1 first said it happened in R1’s bedroom, but later thought they were “bending over” the trunk of S1’s car. R1 could not remember if S1 was wearing gloves during the incident. When asked whether R1 was clothed or unclothed, R1 said they were still wearing underwear and pants. R1 said they reported the incident to another female staff, the facility director, and R1’s sister. (It was noted that R1’s “sister” is not a sister, but R1’s resident representative.) R1 declined medical treatment and a forensic examination. R1 asked if the suspect would be prosecuted. Officer Hammer told R1 an investigation would be conducted. R1 indicated that they did not know whether they wanted the suspect to be prosecuted. Detective Martineau’s Supplemental Report, dated 02/07/2023, noted that on 02/01/2023, R1’s resident representative stated they did not wish to proceed with filing criminal charges. Detective Martineau closed the investigation based on the fact that R1’s resident representative is R1’s power of attorney (POA) and did not wish to proceed with the investigation, R1 did not want to provide further statements, and R1 said they did not know whether they wanted the suspect prosecuted. The investigation findings concluded that although R1 consistently reported that a staff inserted their finger in R1’s rectum, pulled out pubic hair and made inappropriate comments, there were also inconsistencies in R1’s statement that Detective Martineau and Investigator Barragan were unable to clarify. R1’s resident representative and power of attorney did not allow R1 to be interviewed by Detective Martineau or Investigator Barragan because R1 did not want to talk about the sexual assault anymore. R1 refused to undergo a forensic exam when it was offered by Atascadero Police Officer Hammer. R1 was unable to physically describe or identify the staff. R1 did not remember whether the incident occurred in R1’s bedroom or in the parking lot next to the staff’s vehicle. R1 told Officer Hammer that R1’s pants and underwear were on when the incident occurred. R1 has a diagnosis of Alzheimer/dementia and according to interviews with staff, shortly after reporting this allegation R1 began hallucinating and making inappropriate sexual comments towards them. Staff and residents interviewed reported no concerns regarding sexual abuse and did not provide any information to indicate S1 spoke inappropriately to R1. S1 adamantly denied the allegations and denied making rude comments towards R1. S1 has worked for the Licensee/Administrator for 15 years. S1 has never been disciplined before and there have been no prior complaints against S1. The Licensee/Administrator described S1 as a good employee that is always willing to cover extra shifts when needed. Detective Martineau closed his investigation due to R1 and R1’s resident representative did not want to proceed with filing criminal charges. Based on the information obtained during the course of the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to support the above allegations. Therefore, the above allegations “Facility staff sexually assaulted resident in care” and “Facility staff spoke inappropriately to resident in care” are deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and the report given to the licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 2, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230109151810
Feb 15, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 2/15/23 at 1:23 pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chavez conducted an unannounced on-site annual infection control visit to the facility above. LPA met with Diana Barnhill, Licensee/Administrator, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility with licensee and observed the following: At 1:28 pm, the knife drawer in the kitchen was unlocked and containing sharps. This violates the regulation for care of persons with dementia. Deficiency cited. The facility has signage at the front door regarding the visitor policy and signage throughout the facility on infection control precautions. Screening, hand sanitizer and visitor log were available upon entry. The facility has seven single-occupancy resident rooms and three double-occupancy resident rooms. Each room includes an attached bathroom. Individual resident bathrooms and bathrooms in the common areas were stocked with soap and paper towels. Between 1:37 pm and 2:06 pm, the water temperatures in seven bathrooms were tested and recorded at 125.1F (Room 10), 127.4F (bathroom next to Room 10), 126.2F (Room 9), 130.7F (Room 4), 128.8F (bathroom next to Room 1), 88.7F (Room 2), and 120.5F (Room 3) degrees. Water temperatures are not in compliance of the regulatory 105F to 120F degrees. Deficiency cited. At 2:05 pm, Staff #1 (S1) was wearing their mask below their nose with residents in the facility. The facility did not protect the personal rights of residents in care to be able to receive safe and healthful accommodations in that the facility staff failed to wear face coverings properly while providing care and supervision to residents in care. This is a violation of official government orders requiring the wearing of face coverings while working under specified conditions. Deficiency cited. The facility has two fire extinguishers, one located in the hall next to the laundry and the other in the hall near the resident tv area. Both are fully charged and were inspected on 8/23/22. At 2:15 pm, LPA conducted the Infection Control mitigation module with the licensee. Exit interview conducted, deficiencies cited, and the report and appeal rights emailed to the licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 15, 2023
20222 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 21, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: COVID-19 screening protocols are not being followed Covid-19 masking protocols are not being followed
On 9/21/2022 at 1:18 pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Darlene Chavez conducted an unannounced follow-up complaint visit to the facility above. LPA met with Diana Barnhill, Licensee/Administrator, and explained the purpose of the visit. On the allegations, “COVID-19 screening protocols are not being followed,” and “Covid-19 masking protocols are not being followed,” the complainant’s concern was that visitors were not screened for COVID-19 upon entry to the facility and two caregiving staff were observed not properly wearing masks. To investigate the allegations, LPA made observations and took photos. Continued on 9099-C Substantiated On 12/21/21 at 2:15 pm, credible Witnesses #1 (W1) and #2 (W2) say they were not screened for COVID-19 upon entry to the facility. They state staff did not perform temperature checks or any other screening method upon entry to the facility. During the visit, they observed two caregivers wearing masks that did not cover their noses. One caregiver's mask did not cover their mouth while they were giving care to residents. On 1/3/22 at 2:02 pm, LPA visited the facility and upon entry was not screened for COVID-19. LPA requested that staff conduct screening upon which staff then took LPA’s temperature and asked LPA to sign the visitor log. LPA took photos of the visitor log and observed that staff and visitors are signing in, however, LPA and credible witnesses were not screened during their visits on 12/21/21 and 1/3/22. Based on the evidence obtained, the allegations “COVID-19 screening protocols are not being followed,” and “Covid-19 masking protocols are not being followed,” are deemed Substantiated at this time. The facility did not protect the personal rights of residents in care to be able to receive safe and healthful accommodations in that the facility staff failed to wear face coverings properly while providing care and supervision to residents in care and did not screen visitors for COVID-19. This is a violation of official government orders requiring the wearing of face coverings while working under specified conditions. Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations, the deficiency will be cited on 9099-D. Exit interview conducted, deficiency cited, and the report and appeal rights emailed to Licensee. On 9/21/22 between 1:28 pm and 2:07 pm, LPA interviewed Staff #1 (S1), Staff #2 (S2), and Staff #3 (S3). All three staff say that food is not left on the counter and specifically mentioned that they do not do this due to the fact residents sometimes enter the kitchen and take food. Staff describe the process of thawing food as moving frozen food from the freezer to the refrigerator and placing it in a tray. Staff say when they’re ready to use it, they remove the thawed food from the refrigerator. At 2:14 pm, LPA observed a tray of pork chops in the refrigerator. At 2:26 pm, LPA observed S3 preparing dinner. S3 took the pork chops from the refrigerator, prepared them in a separate dish, and immediately placed them in the oven. Based on the evidence obtained, the allegation, “Food safety protocols are not being followed,” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. LPA observations and staff interviews indicate food is being stored properly. On the allegation, “Sufficient quantity and/or quality of food not available for the residents in care,” the complainant was concerned that there was no fresh fruit in the facility. To investigate the allegation, LPA made observations, took photos, and reviewed records. On 1/03/22 at 2:07 pm, LPA toured the kitchen and observed the following: There was a basket of nine mandarin oranges on the counter, twelve cans of fruit and one banana in the pantry, ten to twelve pears in the refrigerator, a gallon container of orange juice, a 48 ounce jar of prune juice, and a 47 ounce jar of applesauce. On 9/21/22 at 2:15 pm, LPA observed a basket of apples and pears on the counter and in the kitchen open cabinet, two bunches of bananas, a bag of mandarin oranges, a watermelon and cantaloupe. Based on the evidence obtained, the allegation “Sufficient quantity and/or quality of food not available for the residents in care,” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. LPA observed a sufficient quantity and quality of produce available in the facility. Exit interview conducted and the report emailed to the licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 21, 2022 · control 29-AS-20211229153609
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1 · Plan of correction due date: Sep 22, 2022
87468.1 Personal Rights. Residents have the right to be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observations and witness testimony, the facility failed to ensure staff were wearing face coverings and did not screen visitors which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 21, 2022
Plan of correction: Infectious control training will be held with staff, and licensee will emphasize the reasons for proper use of PPE for residents and staff which will be completed by 9/28/22. Licensee will send a staff sign-in sheet from the training with staff printed names, signatures, and date of training immediately upon training being completed. Licensee will send LPA a commitment by 9/22/22 to complete the training by 9/28/22.
Mar 3, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 3/03/22 at 11:01 am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chavez conducted an unannounced on-site annual infection control visit to the facility above. LPA met with Office Manager Leticia Ruiz and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility with office manager and observed the following: The facility has signage at the front door regarding the visitor policy. LPA was screened upon entry. The facility has seven single-occupancy resident rooms and three double-occupancy resident rooms. Each room includes an attached bathroom. Individual resident bathrooms and the bathrooms in the common areas were stocked with soap and paper towels. The facility has signage for COVID infection control measures including cough etiquette and handwashing reminders. There are two fire extinguishers, one located in the hall next to the laundry and the other in the hall near the resident tv area. Both are fully charged and were inspected on 8/26/2021. LPA observed all staff wearing surgical masks properly. The facility has a 11”x14” Community Care Licensing Complaint poster in a common area, however, regulation requires a 20”x26” poster. Licensee will ensure the proper size poster is displayed. At 11:20 am, LPA conducted the Infection Control mitigation module with the office manager. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted and report emailed to the licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 3, 2022
20212 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 24, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On 8/24/21 at 11:28 am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chavez visited the facility to follow-up on a Plan of Correction issued on 8/20/21. LPA met with Leticia Ruiz, Office Manager, and explained the reason for the visit. Ms. Ruiz confirmed that the facility currently has 13 residents and there were concerns with transferring the 13th resident out of the facility due to health issues. LPA reminded office manager that it was not required that the 13th resident is transferred, but rather one resident is moved out to be in compliance with the facility's licensed 12 residents. LPA left the facility at 11:37 am and returned again at 1:17 pm. LPA met with Emma Maxwell, Caregiver, and explained the reason for the visit. Emma phoned the administrator Diana Barnhill who stated she was not available to visit the facility and asked Emma to handle the visit and sign the report(s). The facility has 13 residents, and therefore, is still not in compliance and being cited for deficiency. Civil penalties are being issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 24, 2021
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87204(a) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 25, 2021
A licensee shall not operate a facility beyond the conditions and limitations specified on the license, including specification of the maximum number of persons…This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Census at facility. The licensee did not comply with capacity limitations facility has a current census of 13 and a license for 12 which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care. A citation is being given after licensee did not complete POC to meet regulation on 8/21/21.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 24, 2021
Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to finalize application for capacity increase. Licensee will move forward in compliance with capacity limitations. License has agreed to move one resident out of the facility within 24 hours with approval from resident's family or person of responsbility to meet capacity of current license. Civil Penalties Assessed.
Aug 20, 2021Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is operating beyond the terms and conditions of the license
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chavez conducted a 10-day complaint investigation visit to the facility above. LPA met with caregiver Lorraine Hurst and explained the reason for the visit. It was reported to Community Care Licensing (CCL) that the facility above was over capacity. LPA verified census with Licensee/Administrator to be 13. CCL received an application from the Licensee for an increase of capacity; however, the application has not been approved due to documentation pending from the Licensee. The facility license is authorized for a capacity of 12, therefore the facility is not in compliance with regulation requirements. LPA requested Licensee to complete the application documentation and submit to CCL as soon as possible. LPA also instructed Licensee to immediately move one resident to another facility with approval from resident’s family or person of responsibility. Based on the information obtained, the allegation "Facility is operating beyond the terms and conditions of the license" is Substantiated. Exit interview conducted, deficiency cited, report and appeal rights emailed to Licensee. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 20, 2021 · control 29-AS-20210819140101
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87204(a) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 21, 2021
A licensee shall not operate a facility beyond the conditions and limitations specified on the license, including specification of the maximum number of persons…This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Census at facility. The licensee did not comply with capacity limitations facility has a current census of 13 and a license for 12 which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 20, 2021
Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to finalize application for capacity increase and provide a written statement stating the Licensee will not accept any further residents in care until the outcome of the application is decided, regardless of the outcome of application. Licensee will move forward in compliance with capacity limitations. License has agreed to move one resident out of the facility within 24 hours with approval from resident's family or person of responsbility to meet capacity of current license. Civil Penalty Assessed.
10 of 13 beds were occupied at the September 3, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Park Place Assisted Living LLC, licensed since 2021.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2021, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 19
- Total complaints
- 7
- Substantiated allegations
- 8
- Type A citations
- 3
- Type B citations
- 3
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2021, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 3 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 3 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 8 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 7 | 1 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 327 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Park Place Assisted Living
Is Park Place Assisted Living licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Park Place Assisted Living licensed for?
13 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Park Place Assisted Living been cited?
3 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 19 state visits over the same years.
Is Park Place Assisted Living still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Park Place Assisted Living cost?
$5,000 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living one bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 27 other homes of a similar licensed size across San Luis Obispo County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,838 to $7,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,500 (n = 27 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Park Place Assisted Living take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Park Place Assisted Living LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Can Park Place Assisted Living keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 8 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Park Place Assisted Living license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “PARK PLACE ASSISTED LIVING”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #405850052. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 13 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Park Place Assisted Living LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 19 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 3 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 19 state visits in that period.
- 7 complaints and 8 substantiated allegations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is March 26, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Luis Obispo County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$4,950 a month to start
Listed by the home on its own website · October 5, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,950 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,700–$7,850On the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,450 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,450–$6,700On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$4,500 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,800 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,600–$7,600On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,350 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,400–$6,600On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Luis Obispo County