Park Place Assisted Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Atascadero, San Luis Obispo County, California — state license #405850052, licensed for 13 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 15 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated March 26, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

6 homes in view

Park Place Assisted Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 13 residents · Atascadero, CA · San Luis Obispo County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #405850052, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
7500 Portola Rd · Atascadero, San Luis Obispo County
Phone
(805) 591-9855
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 13 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 8 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 12 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 13 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 12 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 8.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 21 times and filed 15 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated March 26, 2026.

Most recent state visit
March 26, 2026
Occupancy at the September 3, 2025 visit
10 of 13 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 9 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 20, 2021 to September 3, 2025. 9 of the 9 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (6), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 9 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 9 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 10 of 15 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Mar 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 31, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not ensure that the facility obtained fire clearance and approval of a delayed egress device on facility door.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Leon conducted a 10 day complaint visit to the facility above. LPA met with Administrator/Licensee Diana Barnhill and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested the following records: Staff Roster, Staff Schedule for August 2025, Resident roster and copy of video surveillance of the kitchen area on 08/26/2025. LPA interviewed staff around 10:30am, toured the kitchen, dining, took photographs of the front exiting doors, and observed the secured perimeter patio to have fencing all around courtyard with a magentic locking mechanicsm on the gates around patio with a magnetic key phobe for opening gates. On the allegation: Licensee did not ensure that the facility obtained fire clearance and approval of a delayed egress device on facility door. The facility was originally licensed on 03/16/2021 and at that time the front door had key coded exit, and the facility courtyard was a fenced secured perimeter with a magnetic key phobe on gates. The fire clthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250827130039
Mar 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20244 state visits · 5 documents
Oct 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not give a resident sufficient notice of rate increases. Facility is not following a resident's care plan.

At 9:30am on10/07/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries conducted a subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings on this investigation. LPA met with BOM, Letica Ruiz-Guerrero and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, LPA De Leon conducted an initial visit on 12/28/2023 from 12:30pm to 2:10pm, where LPA interviewed staff and residents and requested documents. LPA conducted additional resident and staff interviews on 7/22/2024 from 10:15am to 3:15pm on another complaint with a similar allegation. Additional interviews with witness, Administrator and staff were conducted on 10/3/2024. On the allegation: Facility did not give a resident sufficient notice of rate increases. It was alleged R1 was not given proper 60 days written notice for the increase, as the notice was provided 11/20/2023, less than 60 days before 1/1/2024. In August 2023, R1’s rent was originally $7000 per month. LPA reviewed a text message dated 11/21/2023 from the Administrator tothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2024 · control 29-AS-20231227101251
Oct 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not treat residents with respect

At 9:30am on 10/07/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffrues conducted a subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings on this investigation. LPA met with BOM, Letica Ruiz-Guerrero and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, LPA De Leon conducted an initial visit on 7/22/2024 from 10:15am to 3:15pm, where LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and residents and requested documents. Additional interviews with witness, Administrator and staff were conducted on 10/3/2024. On the allegation: Staff did not treat residents with respect. It was alleged residents cry due to being yelled at by staff. Multiple residents interviewed stated they were treated “fine,” “well,” “very well,” and said there was no yelling or disrespect. One resident stated a staff was disrespectful. Staff stated they never yell at residents, and treat residents with respect. Administrator stated staff have never yelled or been disrespectful, and they would not tolerate that behavior fthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240715084408
Jul 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate food service Staff did not provide a comfortable temperature for residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Leon conducted a 10-day complaint visit to the facility above. LPA met with Diana Barnhill Administrator/Licensee and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested the following documentation: Staff Roster with telephone numbers, Staff Schedule for 07/2024, Resident Roster, a new and an old copy of Resident 1 (R1) LIC 602A Physicians report, 5 weeks of resident food menus, and any residents special diets. Administrator provided all records except no residents are currently on any physican precribed special diet. LPA toured the facility kitchen, food supply in refrigerator/freezer, food pantry, additonal food stored in basement refirgerators, 3 resident rooms and the secured courtyard. LPA conducted interviews with staff at 11:15am, 11:35am, 12:20pm and 12:27pm. LPA conducted interviews with residents at 12:45pm, 1:00pm, and 1:10pm. Continued 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 22, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240715084408
Jun 28, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure an adequate supply of food is maintained and accessible at the facility. Staff are not adhering to food service requirements.

On 06/28/2024, at 10:00am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries arrived unannouced to the facility to deliver final findings to both allegations to this complaint. LPA met with Administrator Diana Barnhill, announced who he is and the reason for the visit. As to the allegation of, “Licensee does not ensure an adequate supply of food is maintained and accessible at the facility.” It was alleged that on 09/20/23, and 10/11 and 12/2023 the facility did not have sufficient food for residents and fresh fruit is not available to residents. It was discovered through documentation, grocery receipts, observations and interviews that on 10/23/23, LPA Jeffries conducted interviews of 6 or 12 Residents (R1, 2, 3, etc…) residing at the facility, R1-R6 all stated that they can request food or snacks at any time and have never been denied food or snacks at this facility. Interviews of Staff 1-4 (S1, S2, and S3) on 10/23/23, all stated that they provide residents with snacks twice a day and whenevethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 28, 2024 · control 29-AS-20231016094648
Mar 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 1, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide medications as prescribed. Staff did not assist with medications refills in a timely manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Leon conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility above to deliver final findings. LPA met with Care Staff and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA spoke with Administrator/Licensee by phone and LPA will have staff sign report. LPA De Leon conducted the initial 10-day complaint visit to the facility on 05/22/2023, conducted interviews at 10:00am, reviewed records and requested copies of records. LPA De Leon interviewed witness at 4:54pm on 05/22/2023. On 05/23/2023 LPA De Leon received additional medication records. LPA De Leon reviewed all medication records on 11/18/2023 and requested additional records. LPA De Leon reviewed additional records on 11/20/23, 11/22/2023 and 11/27/2023. On the allegation: Staff did not provide medications as prescribed. LPA De Leon reviewed Medications records for R1 which revealed 2 medications Timolol and Latanoprost were not being ordered monthly. Continued 9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 1, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230517162207
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations4typical 0
Type B citations3typical 0
Substantiated complaints9typical 0
Total complaints8typical 1
State visits on file21typical 8
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 307 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020253312024452202333120222212021221
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Luis Obispo County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (805) 591-9855

Is Park Place Assisted Living licensed?

Yes — Park Place Assisted Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Atascadero (San Luis Obispo County): California license #405850052, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 13 residents. State records list 15 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated March 26, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Park Place Assisted Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Park Place Assisted Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 13 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 12 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 8.

How much does Park Place Assisted Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Park Place Assisted Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Luis Obispo County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Park Place Assisted Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Park Place Assisted Living is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

10 of 13 beds occupied (77%) when the state visited on September 3, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Park Place Assisted Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 21 state visits and 15 dated documents since 2021 for Park Place Assisted Living; 9 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated September 3, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

9 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not ensure that the facility obtained fire clearance and approval of a delayed egress device on facility door.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Leon conducted a 10 day complaint visit to the facility above. LPA met with Administrator/Licensee Diana Barnhill and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested the following records: Staff Roster, Staff Schedule for August 2025, Resident roster and copy of video surveillance of the kitchen area on 08/26/2025. LPA interviewed staff around 10:30am, toured the kitchen, dining, took photographs of the front exiting doors, and observed the secured perimeter patio to have fencing all around courtyard with a magentic locking mechanicsm on the gates around patio with a magnetic key phobe for opening gates. On the allegation: Licensee did not ensure that the facility obtained fire clearance and approval of a delayed egress device on facility door. The facility was originally licensed on 03/16/2021 and at that time the front door had key coded exit, and the facility courtyard was a fenced secured perimeter with a magnetic key phobe on gates. The fire clCDSS inspection report, September 3, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250827130039

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not give a resident sufficient notice of rate increases. Facility is not following a resident's care plan.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At 9:30am on10/07/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries conducted a subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings on this investigation. LPA met with BOM, Letica Ruiz-Guerrero and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, LPA De Leon conducted an initial visit on 12/28/2023 from 12:30pm to 2:10pm, where LPA interviewed staff and residents and requested documents. LPA conducted additional resident and staff interviews on 7/22/2024 from 10:15am to 3:15pm on another complaint with a similar allegation. Additional interviews with witness, Administrator and staff were conducted on 10/3/2024. On the allegation: Facility did not give a resident sufficient notice of rate increases. It was alleged R1 was not given proper 60 days written notice for the increase, as the notice was provided 11/20/2023, less than 60 days before 1/1/2024. In August 2023, R1’s rent was originally $7000 per month. LPA reviewed a text message dated 11/21/2023 from the Administrator toCDSS inspection report, October 7, 2024 · control 29-AS-20231227101251
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not treat residents with respect
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At 9:30am on 10/07/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffrues conducted a subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings on this investigation. LPA met with BOM, Letica Ruiz-Guerrero and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, LPA De Leon conducted an initial visit on 7/22/2024 from 10:15am to 3:15pm, where LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and residents and requested documents. Additional interviews with witness, Administrator and staff were conducted on 10/3/2024. On the allegation: Staff did not treat residents with respect. It was alleged residents cry due to being yelled at by staff. Multiple residents interviewed stated they were treated “fine,” “well,” “very well,” and said there was no yelling or disrespect. One resident stated a staff was disrespectful. Staff stated they never yell at residents, and treat residents with respect. Administrator stated staff have never yelled or been disrespectful, and they would not tolerate that behavior fCDSS inspection report, October 7, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240715084408
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide adequate food service Staff did not provide a comfortable temperature for residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Leon conducted a 10-day complaint visit to the facility above. LPA met with Diana Barnhill Administrator/Licensee and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested the following documentation: Staff Roster with telephone numbers, Staff Schedule for 07/2024, Resident Roster, a new and an old copy of Resident 1 (R1) LIC 602A Physicians report, 5 weeks of resident food menus, and any residents special diets. Administrator provided all records except no residents are currently on any physican precribed special diet. LPA toured the facility kitchen, food supply in refrigerator/freezer, food pantry, additonal food stored in basement refirgerators, 3 resident rooms and the secured courtyard. LPA conducted interviews with staff at 11:15am, 11:35am, 12:20pm and 12:27pm. LPA conducted interviews with residents at 12:45pm, 1:00pm, and 1:10pm. Continued 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 22, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240715084408
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee does not ensure an adequate supply of food is maintained and accessible at the facility. Staff are not adhering to food service requirements.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 06/28/2024, at 10:00am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries arrived unannouced to the facility to deliver final findings to both allegations to this complaint. LPA met with Administrator Diana Barnhill, announced who he is and the reason for the visit. As to the allegation of, “Licensee does not ensure an adequate supply of food is maintained and accessible at the facility.” It was alleged that on 09/20/23, and 10/11 and 12/2023 the facility did not have sufficient food for residents and fresh fruit is not available to residents. It was discovered through documentation, grocery receipts, observations and interviews that on 10/23/23, LPA Jeffries conducted interviews of 6 or 12 Residents (R1, 2, 3, etc…) residing at the facility, R1-R6 all stated that they can request food or snacks at any time and have never been denied food or snacks at this facility. Interviews of Staff 1-4 (S1, S2, and S3) on 10/23/23, all stated that they provide residents with snacks twice a day and wheneveCDSS inspection report, June 28, 2024 · control 29-AS-20231016094648

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide medications as prescribed. Staff did not assist with medications refills in a timely manner.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Leon conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility above to deliver final findings. LPA met with Care Staff and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA spoke with Administrator/Licensee by phone and LPA will have staff sign report. LPA De Leon conducted the initial 10-day complaint visit to the facility on 05/22/2023, conducted interviews at 10:00am, reviewed records and requested copies of records. LPA De Leon interviewed witness at 4:54pm on 05/22/2023. On 05/23/2023 LPA De Leon received additional medication records. LPA De Leon reviewed all medication records on 11/18/2023 and requested additional records. LPA De Leon reviewed additional records on 11/20/23, 11/22/2023 and 11/27/2023. On the allegation: Staff did not provide medications as prescribed. LPA De Leon reviewed Medications records for R1 which revealed 2 medications Timolol and Latanoprost were not being ordered monthly. Continued 9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 1, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230517162207
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff sexually assaulted resident in care. Facility staff spoke inappropriately to resident in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Darlene Chavez conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Diana Barnhill, Licensee/Administrator, and explained the reason for the visit. On 01/09/2023, the Department received a complaint regarding Staff #1 (S1) sexually assaulting Resident #1 (R1). It was also alleged that S1 made inappropriate comments towards R1. R1 reported that while S1 was changing them, S1 inserted their finger into R1’s rectum, pulled pubic hair out, held it in front of R1’s face and said, “I pulled this out of your butt.” S1 then told R1 to “shut up.” Staff reported that R1 had dementia, but R1’s statement was concerning because R1 reported it to several people and it was consistent. The case was assigned to the Atascadero Police Department for further investigation as case #23-0052. S1 was suspended from work pending the investigation. The complaint was referred to the Community Care Licensing Investigations Branch (IB) aCDSS inspection report, March 2, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230109151810

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 21 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for mid-size homes (7–15 beds), computed across all 307 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
4
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
9
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
8
typical for this size: 1
State visits on file
21
typical for this size: 8
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(805) 591-9855
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Park Place Assisted Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.