Crystal Creek Senior Living is a residential care facility in Stockton, San Joaquin County, California — state license #392701576, licensed for 80 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved June 12, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. No dated state inspection or complaint documents are on file for this home as of June 12, 2026.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

16 homes in view

Crystal Creek Senior Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care facility · Large community, 80 residents · Stockton, CA · San Joaquin County
LicensedWheelchair not on fileMemory care not on fileHospice not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #392701576 · read from the California state record on June 12, 2026 ·See on State Site →
2435 Wagner Heights Road · Stockton, San Joaquin County
Phone
(209) 477-5353
from the state licensing roster · June 12, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file — ask the home
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

The state has filed 17 documents for this home.

Occupancy at the May 5, 2026 visit
72 of 80 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 17 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 13, 2025 to May 5, 2026. 17 of the 17 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (11). 17 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 17 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 17 of 17 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20264 state visits · 8 documents
May 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not allowing a resident to attend religious meetings.

On 5-5-2026 at 10:15am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) arrived unannounced to deliver and discuss findings for the allegation noted above. LPA met with Director of Wellness Jennifer Almendarez and explained the purpose of the visit. During this investigation, LPA conducted interviews with two staff members and one resident in care. Additionally, LPA reviewed needs and service plan, admissions agreement, physician’s report, facility care notes, and facility’s internal complaint documentation pertaining to resident1 (R1) Allegation: Staff are not allowing a resident to attend religious meetings. Based on interviews and record reviews, on or about 3-29-2026, R1 entered the activity room to watch a religious services program, but was told he was unable to at that moment as it would interfere with other residents wishing to also utilize the television and participate in other activities. On this date, R1 was allowed to watch his religious program in the activities room as an exception. {Cothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 5, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260330153304
May 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure resident's dietary needs are met

On 5-5-2026 at 11:30am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to deliver and discuss findings for the allegations noted above. LPA met with Director of Wellness Jennifer Almendarez and explained the purpose of the visit. During this investigation, LPA conducted interviews with four residents and four staff members. Additionally, LPA reviewed needs and service plan, physician’s report, care notes, weight record, and incident report pertaining to resident1 (R1). LPA also reviewed facility house rules and menus. Allegation: Staff do not ensure resident’s dietary needs are met. LPA conducted interviews and record reviews as noted above. Based on interviews and record reviews, it was revealed that facility staff have offered food items to various residents counter to their dietary needs. It was further revealed through observation that facility staff offers residents in care the same food items while in the dining room. {Cont. on 9099C} Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 5, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260403081111
May 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not respond to resident’s call button. Staff cancels resident’s scheduled appointments.

On 5-5-2026 at 1:30pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to deliver and discuss findings for the allegations noted above. LPA met with Director Wellness Jennifer Almendarez and explained the purpose of the visit. During this investigation, LPA conducted facility observations on 4-22-2026 and 5-5-2026. Additionally, LPA conducted interviews with five staff members and six residents in care. LPA also reviewed facility file documentation including resident appointment calendars Allegation: Staff do not respond to resident’s call button. LPA conducted facility observations and interviews as noted above. During observations conducted, LPA observed staff attending to resident needs and answering call lights within an average time frame of 5-10 minutes. Interviews conducted revealed that 10-15 minutes are the facility’s expectation standards. Further interviews revealed no corroborated statements from staff not responding to resident call buttons. {Cont. on 90the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 5, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260414134148
Apr 22, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that insulin administration to residents was performed by an appropriately skilled professional

On 4-22-2026 at 10:15am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to deliver findings for the allegation noted above. LPA met with Health and Wellness Director Jennifer Almendarez and explained the purpose of the visit. During this investigation, LPA conducted interviews with five staff members and reviewed facility file documentation including medication logs for January and February of 2026, and facility’s medication policy. Allegation: Staff did not ensure that insulin administration to residents was performed by an appropriately skilled professional. LPA conducted interviews and record reviews as noted above. Based on these interviews and record reviews, it was revealed that at the time of review, a total of 15 residents received insulin via flex pen. Interviews also revealed that five of these residents were unable to determine what the dosage should be and required assistance as a result. A review of facility’s medication policy states in part: "Properlythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 22, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260206104333
Mar 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not maintain the resident's room in a sanitary condition. Staff did not ensure that the resident was regularly observed for changes in condition.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis and Melina Oropeza arrived unannounced to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Angela and explained the purpose of the visit. Based on multiple interview with the resident (R1) and observations of R1'S room and records reviewed. the ficility did have care notes for R1 that covered time period, LPA did not obersrve R1'S room to be unsanitary. A finding that the complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 24, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260116125404
Mar 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not assist resident with adequate supervision, resulting in resident unclothed in facility and/or smoking inside of facility. Resident Rights are violated; Staff inappropriately speaks to resident, humiliate resident and/or interact inaapropriately. Staff do not maintain a comfortable temperature in the facility for residents in care. Staff do not distribute residents' medications as prescribed. Staff confined resident to room. Staff do not safeguard resident's mail Staff do not serve residents food of good quality Staff do not have medication training

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis and Melina Oropeza arrived unannounced to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Angela and explained the purpose of the visit. Allegation 1: Staff do not assist resident with adequate supervision, resulting in resident unclothed in facility and/or smoking inside of facility is UNSUBSTANTIATED, based on interviews and observations no residents were unclothed. Allegation 2: Resident Rights are violated; Staff inappropriately speaks to resident, humiliate resident and/or interact inaapropriately. Baed on obersvation over mulitlple visit LPA never heard or saw any staff interact inaapropriately with residents. Allegation 3: Staff do not maintain a comfortable temperature in the facility for residents in care this alleagaton is UNSUBSTANTIATED based on interviews and abservations no resdients stated there were uncomfterbale with the tempiture and over muliple visits the LPA observed the facility to be with in the required tempatthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 24, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260128081241
Jan 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure residents have adequate hygiene supplies.

On 01/21/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis made an unannounced visit to this facility to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit. LPA met with Angela Ringu and a brief interview followed. LPA toured the facility. LPA learned the facility will be installing shower Despensers and updating the facility’s admissions agreement starting March 1st. Based on interviews and document review the facility did not provide body soap to residents therefore the allegation Staff do not ensure residents have adequate hygiene supplies is SUBSTANTIATED. The Department has determined, based on the preponderance of the evidence obtained during this investigation, that the allegation is substantiated. The following deficiency is cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22. Exit interview was conducted with facility staff. Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was given. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 21, 2026 · control 27-AS-20251210083346
Jan 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent residents from fighting.

On 01/21/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis made an unannounced visit to this facility to open an investigation for the above allegations. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit. LPA met with Angela Riungu. Based on documents received and interviews conducted R1 has not been in any physical altercations while in the facility and staff do not keep R2's Cigarettes. Therefore, the allegation Staff did not prevent residents from fighting is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 21, 2026 · control 27-AS-20251209104837
20256 state visits · 9 documents
Dec 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not follow resident's medication orders.

On 12/10/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis made an unannounced visit to this facility to open an investigation for the above allegations. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit. LPA met with Angela Ringu. Based on documents recieved and reviewed the allegation Staff did not follow resident's medication orders is UNSUBSTAITIATED. Both R1 and R2 do not take blood pressure medication.A finding that the complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 10, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251209104837
Dec 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure they had adequate planned activties for residents.

On 12/09/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis made an unannounced visit to this facility to open an investigation into the above allegation. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit. LPA met with Angela Ringu and a brief interview followed. LPA requested a copy of the facilities activities Calander for November and December, and the LPA requested the name of contract for the activity’s director. Based on documents reviewed there is an activity's director on staff and both months of November and December have different activities for the residents to participate in. Therefore, the allegation is UNFOUNDED. This agency has investigated the complaint allegation(s). This agency has found that the complaint was UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation(s) were false, could not have happened and/or was without a reasonable basis. This agency has therefore dismissed the complaint. There were no deficiencies observed or cited during today’s complaint visit. Ethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 9, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251205111053
Dec 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are denying residents medical treatment.

On 12/09/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis made an unannounced visit to this facility to continue an investigation for the above allegations. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit. LPA met with Angela Ringu and a brief interview followed. Based on interviews with staff and residents along with documents reviewed. LPA could not find evidence that the above allegation. R1 was able to be seen by a doctor as they wished, alson with 4 out of 4 residents interviewed felt they could be seen by the doctor as they wished. A review of R1'S medication was done, and all was found to be accounted for. A finding that the complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 9, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251118125214
Dec 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff interfered with resident’s ability to engage in religious activities. Staff threatened resident. Staff transported resident in an unsafe manner. Staff did not safeguard resident’s medication.

On 12/02/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis made an unannounced visit to this facility to deliver findings about the above allegations. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit. Based on interviews with staff and residents along with the reporting party and documents reviewed. LPA could not find evidence that the above allegation. Two of the interviewees stated that the facility purchased items for R1 to engage in their religious activities, there is also no person that can corroborate R1 was transported in an unsafe manner or threatened. A review of R1'S medication was done, and all was found to be accounted for. A finding that the complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251105095151
Dec 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure a safe environment for residents in care.

On 12/02/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis made an unannounced visit to this facility to deliver findings about the above allegations. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit, Based on interviews with staff and residents along with the reporting party. LPA could not find evidence that the above allegation of Staff do not ensure a safe environment for residents in care. was true, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251016152255
Dec 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not assist resident with arranging transportation to attend church Staff do not allow resident access to personal belonging. Staff do not safeguard resident's mail. Staff do not allow resident to travel into the community.

On 12/02/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis made an unannounced visit to this facility to deliver findings about the above allegations. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit. Based on interviews with staff and residents along with the reporting party and documents reviewed. LPA could not find evidence that the above allegation. Interviews with state that when available the facility van was used to transport R1 and when it was not the staff offered to call uber or a cab for R1 this was confirmed their interviews. Based on LPA'S observation R1 had all their belongs and they were available to R1. Mail at the facility is called and passed out by one staff member only. Based on records reviewed R1 cannot leave the facility unassisted. A finding that the complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251010151501
Oct 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff not abiding by contract.

On 11/12/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis made an unannounced visit to this facility to Amed the report for the above allegations and met with Deanna Posada. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit. LPA met with Angela Ringu and a brief interview followed. LPA requested copies of the R1'S admissions agreement, LPA also interviewed and R1. Based on documents reviewed and interview with staff the above allegation is UNFOUNDED. The facility has no intention of moving R1 into a shared room, R1 has lived at the facility for 11 years in a private room and has not waived their right to a private room. The department has determined that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview and copy of report given. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 29, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251021094041
Sep 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility does not have an administrator

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Liza King arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation and follow up incidents that the department has become aware of which need additional follow up. LPM and LPA met with Angela Riungu and explained the purpose of the visit. According to interview and records review, previous Admin last day 07/31/25, current Admin start date date 08/11/25 however documents were not receieved in the RO by the licensee to appoint the individual. Admin Cert 7028459740 exp 07/25/26 and meets all educational experience. On todays date documents were requested to incl. o A letter from the licensee and/or Board appointing the individual as the Administrator o LIC308 o Copy of current Admin Cert o Any documentation that meets the education and/or experience requirements, if applicable o LIC 200 signed by the licensee or designee o LIC 500 to indicate the days/hours the administrator is in the facility o LIC 501 so thathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 19, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250808081449
Aug 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility failed to providfe residents comfortable temperature

On 08/13/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis made an unannounced visit to this facility to open an investigation into the above allegations. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit, and asked to meet with the Designated Facility Administrator/Executive Director (ED). LPA met with Angela Riungu and a brief interview followed. LPA requested a copy of log showing when the power went out and for how long it was documented that the power was out for 10 minutes and the generators came on a few minutes after. The investigation revealed the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided. Unsubstantiathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 13, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250811094532
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — San Joaquin County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

If end-of-life care were ever needed, could they stay here? What’s the plan?
Ask how the 2026 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (209) 477-5353

Is Crystal Creek Senior Living licensed?

Yes — Crystal Creek Senior Living is a licensed residential care facility in Stockton (San Joaquin County): California license #392701576, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked June 12, 2026, licensed for 80 residents. No dated inspection documents appear in the copy of the state record we hold; the state's public site carries the complete history.

Can Crystal Creek Senior Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked June 12, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked June 12, 2026 lists no specialized-care clearances for Crystal Creek Senior Living (wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden are not on file). A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

How much does Crystal Creek Senior Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Crystal Creek Senior Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Joaquin County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Crystal Creek Senior Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Crystal Creek Senior Living is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

72 of 80 beds occupied (90%) when the state visited on May 5, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Crystal Creek Senior Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked June 12, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked June 12, 2026 for Crystal Creek Senior Living includes 17 complaint-investigation narratives, transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 5, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

17 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not allowing a resident to attend religious meetings.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 5-5-2026 at 10:15am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) arrived unannounced to deliver and discuss findings for the allegation noted above. LPA met with Director of Wellness Jennifer Almendarez and explained the purpose of the visit. During this investigation, LPA conducted interviews with two staff members and one resident in care. Additionally, LPA reviewed needs and service plan, admissions agreement, physician’s report, facility care notes, and facility’s internal complaint documentation pertaining to resident1 (R1) Allegation: Staff are not allowing a resident to attend religious meetings. Based on interviews and record reviews, on or about 3-29-2026, R1 entered the activity room to watch a religious services program, but was told he was unable to at that moment as it would interfere with other residents wishing to also utilize the television and participate in other activities. On this date, R1 was allowed to watch his religious program in the activities room as an exception. {CoCDSS inspection report, May 5, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260330153304
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure resident's dietary needs are met
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 5-5-2026 at 11:30am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to deliver and discuss findings for the allegations noted above. LPA met with Director of Wellness Jennifer Almendarez and explained the purpose of the visit. During this investigation, LPA conducted interviews with four residents and four staff members. Additionally, LPA reviewed needs and service plan, physician’s report, care notes, weight record, and incident report pertaining to resident1 (R1). LPA also reviewed facility house rules and menus. Allegation: Staff do not ensure resident’s dietary needs are met. LPA conducted interviews and record reviews as noted above. Based on interviews and record reviews, it was revealed that facility staff have offered food items to various residents counter to their dietary needs. It was further revealed through observation that facility staff offers residents in care the same food items while in the dining room. {Cont. on 9099C} SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 5, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260403081111
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not respond to resident’s call button. Staff cancels resident’s scheduled appointments.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 5-5-2026 at 1:30pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to deliver and discuss findings for the allegations noted above. LPA met with Director Wellness Jennifer Almendarez and explained the purpose of the visit. During this investigation, LPA conducted facility observations on 4-22-2026 and 5-5-2026. Additionally, LPA conducted interviews with five staff members and six residents in care. LPA also reviewed facility file documentation including resident appointment calendars Allegation: Staff do not respond to resident’s call button. LPA conducted facility observations and interviews as noted above. During observations conducted, LPA observed staff attending to resident needs and answering call lights within an average time frame of 5-10 minutes. Interviews conducted revealed that 10-15 minutes are the facility’s expectation standards. Further interviews revealed no corroborated statements from staff not responding to resident call buttons. {Cont. on 90CDSS inspection report, May 5, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260414134148
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure that insulin administration to residents was performed by an appropriately skilled professional
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 4-22-2026 at 10:15am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to deliver findings for the allegation noted above. LPA met with Health and Wellness Director Jennifer Almendarez and explained the purpose of the visit. During this investigation, LPA conducted interviews with five staff members and reviewed facility file documentation including medication logs for January and February of 2026, and facility’s medication policy. Allegation: Staff did not ensure that insulin administration to residents was performed by an appropriately skilled professional. LPA conducted interviews and record reviews as noted above. Based on these interviews and record reviews, it was revealed that at the time of review, a total of 15 residents received insulin via flex pen. Interviews also revealed that five of these residents were unable to determine what the dosage should be and required assistance as a result. A review of facility’s medication policy states in part: "ProperlyCDSS inspection report, April 22, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260206104333
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not maintain the resident's room in a sanitary condition. Staff did not ensure that the resident was regularly observed for changes in condition.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis and Melina Oropeza arrived unannounced to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Angela and explained the purpose of the visit. Based on multiple interview with the resident (R1) and observations of R1'S room and records reviewed. the ficility did have care notes for R1 that covered time period, LPA did not obersrve R1'S room to be unsanitary. A finding that the complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 24, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260116125404
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not assist resident with adequate supervision, resulting in resident unclothed in facility and/or smoking inside of facility. Resident Rights are violated; Staff inappropriately speaks to resident, humiliate resident and/or interact inaapropriately. Staff do not maintain a comfortable temperature in the facility for residents in care. Staff do not distribute residents' medications as prescribed. Staff confined resident to room. Staff do not safeguard resident's mail Staff do not serve residents food of good quality Staff do not have medication training
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis and Melina Oropeza arrived unannounced to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Angela and explained the purpose of the visit. Allegation 1: Staff do not assist resident with adequate supervision, resulting in resident unclothed in facility and/or smoking inside of facility is UNSUBSTANTIATED, based on interviews and observations no residents were unclothed. Allegation 2: Resident Rights are violated; Staff inappropriately speaks to resident, humiliate resident and/or interact inaapropriately. Baed on obersvation over mulitlple visit LPA never heard or saw any staff interact inaapropriately with residents. Allegation 3: Staff do not maintain a comfortable temperature in the facility for residents in care this alleagaton is UNSUBSTANTIATED based on interviews and abservations no resdients stated there were uncomfterbale with the tempiture and over muliple visits the LPA observed the facility to be with in the required tempatCDSS inspection report, March 24, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260128081241
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure residents have adequate hygiene supplies.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 01/21/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis made an unannounced visit to this facility to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit. LPA met with Angela Ringu and a brief interview followed. LPA toured the facility. LPA learned the facility will be installing shower Despensers and updating the facility’s admissions agreement starting March 1st. Based on interviews and document review the facility did not provide body soap to residents therefore the allegation Staff do not ensure residents have adequate hygiene supplies is SUBSTANTIATED. The Department has determined, based on the preponderance of the evidence obtained during this investigation, that the allegation is substantiated. The following deficiency is cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22. Exit interview was conducted with facility staff. Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was given. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 21, 2026 · control 27-AS-20251210083346
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent residents from fighting.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 01/21/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis made an unannounced visit to this facility to open an investigation for the above allegations. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit. LPA met with Angela Riungu. Based on documents received and interviews conducted R1 has not been in any physical altercations while in the facility and staff do not keep R2's Cigarettes. Therefore, the allegation Staff did not prevent residents from fighting is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 21, 2026 · control 27-AS-20251209104837

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not follow resident's medication orders.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 12/10/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis made an unannounced visit to this facility to open an investigation for the above allegations. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit. LPA met with Angela Ringu. Based on documents recieved and reviewed the allegation Staff did not follow resident's medication orders is UNSUBSTAITIATED. Both R1 and R2 do not take blood pressure medication.A finding that the complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 10, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251209104837
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure they had adequate planned activties for residents.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 12/09/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis made an unannounced visit to this facility to open an investigation into the above allegation. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit. LPA met with Angela Ringu and a brief interview followed. LPA requested a copy of the facilities activities Calander for November and December, and the LPA requested the name of contract for the activity’s director. Based on documents reviewed there is an activity's director on staff and both months of November and December have different activities for the residents to participate in. Therefore, the allegation is UNFOUNDED. This agency has investigated the complaint allegation(s). This agency has found that the complaint was UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation(s) were false, could not have happened and/or was without a reasonable basis. This agency has therefore dismissed the complaint. There were no deficiencies observed or cited during today’s complaint visit. ECDSS inspection report, December 9, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251205111053
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are denying residents medical treatment.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 12/09/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis made an unannounced visit to this facility to continue an investigation for the above allegations. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit. LPA met with Angela Ringu and a brief interview followed. Based on interviews with staff and residents along with documents reviewed. LPA could not find evidence that the above allegation. R1 was able to be seen by a doctor as they wished, alson with 4 out of 4 residents interviewed felt they could be seen by the doctor as they wished. A review of R1'S medication was done, and all was found to be accounted for. A finding that the complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 9, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251118125214
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff interfered with resident’s ability to engage in religious activities. Staff threatened resident. Staff transported resident in an unsafe manner. Staff did not safeguard resident’s medication.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 12/02/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis made an unannounced visit to this facility to deliver findings about the above allegations. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit. Based on interviews with staff and residents along with the reporting party and documents reviewed. LPA could not find evidence that the above allegation. Two of the interviewees stated that the facility purchased items for R1 to engage in their religious activities, there is also no person that can corroborate R1 was transported in an unsafe manner or threatened. A review of R1'S medication was done, and all was found to be accounted for. A finding that the complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 2, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251105095151
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure a safe environment for residents in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 12/02/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis made an unannounced visit to this facility to deliver findings about the above allegations. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit, Based on interviews with staff and residents along with the reporting party. LPA could not find evidence that the above allegation of Staff do not ensure a safe environment for residents in care. was true, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 2, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251016152255
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not assist resident with arranging transportation to attend church Staff do not allow resident access to personal belonging. Staff do not safeguard resident's mail. Staff do not allow resident to travel into the community.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 12/02/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis made an unannounced visit to this facility to deliver findings about the above allegations. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit. Based on interviews with staff and residents along with the reporting party and documents reviewed. LPA could not find evidence that the above allegation. Interviews with state that when available the facility van was used to transport R1 and when it was not the staff offered to call uber or a cab for R1 this was confirmed their interviews. Based on LPA'S observation R1 had all their belongs and they were available to R1. Mail at the facility is called and passed out by one staff member only. Based on records reviewed R1 cannot leave the facility unassisted. A finding that the complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.CDSS inspection report, December 2, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251010151501
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff not abiding by contract.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 11/12/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis made an unannounced visit to this facility to Amed the report for the above allegations and met with Deanna Posada. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit. LPA met with Angela Ringu and a brief interview followed. LPA requested copies of the R1'S admissions agreement, LPA also interviewed and R1. Based on documents reviewed and interview with staff the above allegation is UNFOUNDED. The facility has no intention of moving R1 into a shared room, R1 has lived at the facility for 11 years in a private room and has not waived their right to a private room. The department has determined that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview and copy of report given. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, October 29, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251021094041
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not have an administrator
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Liza King arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation and follow up incidents that the department has become aware of which need additional follow up. LPM and LPA met with Angela Riungu and explained the purpose of the visit. According to interview and records review, previous Admin last day 07/31/25, current Admin start date date 08/11/25 however documents were not receieved in the RO by the licensee to appoint the individual. Admin Cert 7028459740 exp 07/25/26 and meets all educational experience. On todays date documents were requested to incl. o A letter from the licensee and/or Board appointing the individual as the Administrator o LIC308 o Copy of current Admin Cert o Any documentation that meets the education and/or experience requirements, if applicable o LIC 200 signed by the licensee or designee o LIC 500 to indicate the days/hours the administrator is in the facility o LIC 501 so thaCDSS inspection report, September 19, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250808081449
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to providfe residents comfortable temperature
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 08/13/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis made an unannounced visit to this facility to open an investigation into the above allegations. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit, and asked to meet with the Designated Facility Administrator/Executive Director (ED). LPA met with Angela Riungu and a brief interview followed. LPA requested a copy of log showing when the power went out and for how long it was documented that the power was out for 10 minutes and the generators came on a few minutes after. The investigation revealed the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided. UnsubstantiaCDSS inspection report, August 13, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250811094532

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked June 12, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged state visits for this home as of June 12, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
Not on file
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
Not on file
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
Not on file
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
Not on file
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
Not on file
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(209) 477-5353
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Crystal Creek Senior Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.