St. Timothy's Home is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Stockton, San Joaquin County, California — state license #392700908, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 16 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated July 16, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

7 homes in view

St. Timothy's Home

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Stockton, CA · San Joaquin County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #392700908, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
9230 Lariat Lane · Stockton, San Joaquin County
Phone
(650) 267-3248
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 4 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 2 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 4 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 16 times and filed 16 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 16, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 16, 2026
Occupancy at the May 26, 2026 visit
4 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 6 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 19, 2024 to May 26, 2026. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 6 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 14 of 16 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20266 state visits · 7 documents
Jul 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 26, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not follow proper eviction protocols with resident in care.

On 05/26/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson arrived unannounced to open the complaint for this facility. Based on the information obtained, the allegation that the facility engaged in unsafe discharge practices, failed to coordinate continuity of care, and refused to accept R1 back into the facility is substantiated. The preponderance of evidence supports that the facility failed to follow required discharge and eviction procedures, failed to coordinate continuity of care, and refused to accept R1 back into the facility following ED evaluation. Therefore, the allegation is substantiated. A deficiency will be cited on the LIC 9099D page. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 26, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260522125335
Apr 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 19, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Untiimely medical care resulted in sepsis

On 3-19-2026 at 1:30pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to deliver findings for the allegation noted above. LPA met with staff 2 (S2) and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA contacted Administrator Maria Almendrala and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator gave permission for S2 to sign in her absense. During the course of this investigation, LPA reviewed various facility file documentation including physician’s report, medication log sheets, and care notes regarding resident1 (R1). Additionally, LPA reviewed hospital visit records pertaining to R1, and conducted interview with staff1 (S1). Allegation: Untimely medical care resulted in sepsis. Based on documentation reviewed, it was revealed that on 10-14-2024, a facility care note reads: “Resident not feeling well, Administrator ask if she wants to see Doctor, she refused.” Additional care notes beyond this date did not indicate a follow up until 12-27-2024 which a care note states: “the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2026 · control 27-AS-20251003154007
Mar 19, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 17, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20254 state visits · 4 documents
Nov 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident developed a pressure injury due to neglect. Facility didn't seek medical attention in a timely manner.

Unannounced complaint visit made out to this facility on 10/10/2025 by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Charlie Yang who was met by the facility staff person, Avia Singh, who was briefly interviewed at this time. This LPA requested that this facility staff person go ahead and contact the facility designated Administrator, Maria Almendrala, to inform her that CCL was present at this time. This LPA was informed that the facility designated Administrator would not be able to be present for todays complaint visit and allowed the present facility staff person to accept all documents related to this complaint at this time. Current census was 5 residents. The purpose of this complaint visit was to deliver the findings of this investigation to this facility, and it's representative, at this time. Based on a review of the forms and documents related to this investigation, it was learned that R1 had several medical issues requiring care and supervision related to R1's mental and physical conditiothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250610161834
Jul 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility failed to disburse funds owed to the deceased's family.

Unannounced complaint visit made out to this facility on 07/17/2026 by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Charlie Yang. This LPA was met by the facility caregiver, Nicole Golving, who was briefly interviewed at this time. This LPA requested that she go ahead and contact the facility designated Administrator to inform her that CCL was present at this time. It was learned that the facility designated Administrator, Maria Almendrala, was unable to be present at this time so this LPA would have to deliver and present all findings to the present facility staff person, Nicole Golving, at this time. Current census was 4 residents. The purpose of this visit was to deliver the findings of this complaint investigation to this facility, and it's representatives, at this time. Based on a review of the forms and documents retrieved during the course of this investigation, it was learned that R1 had passed away at this facility after having been a resident here for about a year. It was learned that R1the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 17, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250506095159
Feb 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee is financially abusing resident in care

On 10/23/2024 at 2:50pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to deliver and discuss findings for the allegation noted above. LPA met with lead caregiver Dave Gorbon and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Maria Almendrala was not on site and gave permission via phone for lead caregiver to sign in her absence. During this investigation, LPA conducted interviews with Licensee (S1) and resident1 (R1). LPA also reviewed facility file documentation including needs and services plan, admissions agreement, and physician’s report all pertaining to R1. Additionally, LPA reviewed redacted financial documents submitted by Licensee. Allegation: Licensee is financially abusing resident in care. LPA conducted interviews and record reviews as noted above. Based on interviews and record reviews, it was determined that R1 was admitted to facility on 5/21/24, and a stopped payment for a check written by R1 for $2800 was initiated by R1’s bank shortly after adthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240910134824
Mar 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not retrieve a prescribed medication for a resident in care

On 3-19-24 at 2:27pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to deliver findings for the complaint allegation noted above. LPA met with Administrator Maria Almendrala via phone and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator gave permission for staff2 (S2) to sign paperwork in her absence. During this investigation LPA conducted interviews with two staff members and resident1 (R1). LPA also reviewed facility file documentation including care notes and medication log sheets for R1. Based on interviews, it was determined that R1 was to receive a prescribed antibiotic medication on 1-2-24 after a stay at the hospital. It was further determined through interviews that although facility staff verbalized attempts to retrieve the medication for R1, there was no evidence to prove such attempts were made by facility staff. {Cont. on 9099C} Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240105132112
Feb 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations4typical 0
Type B citations2typical 0
Substantiated complaints6typical 0
Total complaints6typical 0
State visits on file16typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20266722025442202433120231102022110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — San Joaquin County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2026 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (650) 267-3248

Is St. Timothy's Home licensed?

Yes — St. Timothy's Home is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Stockton (San Joaquin County): California license #392700908, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 16 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 16, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can St. Timothy's Home care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists St. Timothy's Home with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 4 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2.

How much does St. Timothy's Home cost?

California's public licensing record does not include St. Timothy's Home's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Joaquin County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does St. Timothy's Home accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

St. Timothy's Home is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

4 of 6 beds occupied (67%) when the state visited on May 26, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for St. Timothy's Home?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 16 state visits and 16 dated documents since 2022 for St. Timothy's Home; 6 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 26, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

6 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not follow proper eviction protocols with resident in care.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 05/26/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson arrived unannounced to open the complaint for this facility. Based on the information obtained, the allegation that the facility engaged in unsafe discharge practices, failed to coordinate continuity of care, and refused to accept R1 back into the facility is substantiated. The preponderance of evidence supports that the facility failed to follow required discharge and eviction procedures, failed to coordinate continuity of care, and refused to accept R1 back into the facility following ED evaluation. Therefore, the allegation is substantiated. A deficiency will be cited on the LIC 9099D page. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 26, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260522125335
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUntiimely medical care resulted in sepsis
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 3-19-2026 at 1:30pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to deliver findings for the allegation noted above. LPA met with staff 2 (S2) and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA contacted Administrator Maria Almendrala and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator gave permission for S2 to sign in her absense. During the course of this investigation, LPA reviewed various facility file documentation including physician’s report, medication log sheets, and care notes regarding resident1 (R1). Additionally, LPA reviewed hospital visit records pertaining to R1, and conducted interview with staff1 (S1). Allegation: Untimely medical care resulted in sepsis. Based on documentation reviewed, it was revealed that on 10-14-2024, a facility care note reads: “Resident not feeling well, Administrator ask if she wants to see Doctor, she refused.” Additional care notes beyond this date did not indicate a follow up until 12-27-2024 which a care note states: “CDSS inspection report, March 19, 2026 · control 27-AS-20251003154007

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident developed a pressure injury due to neglect. Facility didn't seek medical attention in a timely manner.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Unannounced complaint visit made out to this facility on 10/10/2025 by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Charlie Yang who was met by the facility staff person, Avia Singh, who was briefly interviewed at this time. This LPA requested that this facility staff person go ahead and contact the facility designated Administrator, Maria Almendrala, to inform her that CCL was present at this time. This LPA was informed that the facility designated Administrator would not be able to be present for todays complaint visit and allowed the present facility staff person to accept all documents related to this complaint at this time. Current census was 5 residents. The purpose of this complaint visit was to deliver the findings of this investigation to this facility, and it's representative, at this time. Based on a review of the forms and documents related to this investigation, it was learned that R1 had several medical issues requiring care and supervision related to R1's mental and physical conditioCDSS inspection report, October 10, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250610161834
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to disburse funds owed to the deceased's family.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Unannounced complaint visit made out to this facility on 07/17/2026 by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Charlie Yang. This LPA was met by the facility caregiver, Nicole Golving, who was briefly interviewed at this time. This LPA requested that she go ahead and contact the facility designated Administrator to inform her that CCL was present at this time. It was learned that the facility designated Administrator, Maria Almendrala, was unable to be present at this time so this LPA would have to deliver and present all findings to the present facility staff person, Nicole Golving, at this time. Current census was 4 residents. The purpose of this visit was to deliver the findings of this complaint investigation to this facility, and it's representatives, at this time. Based on a review of the forms and documents retrieved during the course of this investigation, it was learned that R1 had passed away at this facility after having been a resident here for about a year. It was learned that R1CDSS inspection report, July 17, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250506095159

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee is financially abusing resident in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/23/2024 at 2:50pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to deliver and discuss findings for the allegation noted above. LPA met with lead caregiver Dave Gorbon and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Maria Almendrala was not on site and gave permission via phone for lead caregiver to sign in her absence. During this investigation, LPA conducted interviews with Licensee (S1) and resident1 (R1). LPA also reviewed facility file documentation including needs and services plan, admissions agreement, and physician’s report all pertaining to R1. Additionally, LPA reviewed redacted financial documents submitted by Licensee. Allegation: Licensee is financially abusing resident in care. LPA conducted interviews and record reviews as noted above. Based on interviews and record reviews, it was determined that R1 was admitted to facility on 5/21/24, and a stopped payment for a check written by R1 for $2800 was initiated by R1’s bank shortly after adCDSS inspection report, October 23, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240910134824
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not retrieve a prescribed medication for a resident in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 3-19-24 at 2:27pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to deliver findings for the complaint allegation noted above. LPA met with Administrator Maria Almendrala via phone and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator gave permission for staff2 (S2) to sign paperwork in her absence. During this investigation LPA conducted interviews with two staff members and resident1 (R1). LPA also reviewed facility file documentation including care notes and medication log sheets for R1. Based on interviews, it was determined that R1 was to receive a prescribed antibiotic medication on 1-2-24 after a stay at the hospital. It was further determined through interviews that although facility staff verbalized attempts to retrieve the medication for R1, there was no evidence to prove such attempts were made by facility staff. {Cont. on 9099C} SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 19, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240105132112

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 16 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
4
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
6
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
6
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
16
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(650) 267-3248
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run St. Timothy's Home? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.