Lakeside Manor is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Lakeside, San Diego County, California — state license #374604472, licensed for 17 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 13 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated August 27, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Lakeside Manor

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 17 residents · Lakeside, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374604472, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
9308 Emerald Grove Ave · Lakeside, San Diego County
Phone
(619) 564-9660
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryVerified in record
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 15 residents
Bedridden careVerified in record

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
THE FACILITY SERVES SEVENTEEN ELDERLY RESIDENTS; AGES 60 AND ABOVE; TWELEVE (12) NON-AMBULATORY AND FIVE (5) BEDRIDDEN; APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FIFTEEN (15).State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 18 times and filed 13 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated August 27, 2025.

Most recent state visit
August 27, 2025
Occupancy at the July 3, 2024 visit
13 of 15 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 5, 2023 to July 3, 2024. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 10 of 13 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20244 state visits · 5 documents
Jul 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not issue required refund to resident's authorized representative.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Debbie Correia conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Herika Rico. It was alleged that the Licensee did not provide Resident 1’s (R1’s) Responsible Party (RP) a full refund after discharge from the facility. A records review revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on February 2, 2022, subsequently R1 was voluntarily discharged on February 9, 2022, with no prior notice. Interviews conducted with Outside Source 1 (OS1), Staff 1 (S1) and a facility records review revealed the facility issued the RP a refund in an amount meeting the Department’s mandate. An interview conducted with OS1, and a prior complaint filed against the facility, alleged the Admission Agreement did not meet California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, therefore there was no contractual agreement in place and Title 22 refund mandate was not warranted. [the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 3, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240429134128
Jul 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that resident was properly clothed. Staff did not provide activities for residents.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dawn Segura conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigation findings. LPA was granted entry into the facility and met with Karina Ramirez, to whom she disclosed the reason for the visit. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above-listed complaint allegations. The investigation consisted of tours of the facility and interviews of facility staff and outside sources. It was reported that Resident 1 (R1) [LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to identify the resident] was observed seated in the living area of the facility with a top and a diaper on, but no bottom item of clothing. Interviews conducted during the investigation confirmed that, on occasions, staff would seat R1 in his/her wheelchair in the common area of the home with a top item of clothing and an adult brief with no bottom clothing or covering on. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2024 · control 08-AS-20230925150942
Jan 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect resulted in pressure injury Neglect resulted in malnourishment

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Iby Strong conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the above-mentioned allegations. LPA identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Owner Matthew DelBruegge. On January 8, 2024, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging neglect of Resident 1 (R1) resulted in pressure injury and neglect of R1 resulted in malnourishment. During the investigation, LPA Strong collected pertinent resident records as well as facility documentation and conducted interviews. According to R1’s Physician Report, dated January 17, 2023, R1 has a mild cognitive impairment, is non-ambulatory, is on a special diet due to dialysis, can follow instruction and can communicate needs. According to allegation, on January 3, 2024, R1 was observed to have pressure injuries on the elbow and sacral area in which staging had not been determined but were alleged to have occurred as a result of neglect. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 29, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240108103817
20233 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 12, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not provide accorded refund. Licensee did not ensure removal of oxygen tanks from facility.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Debbie Correia conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA Correia was greeted by Caregiver Litzy Serrano and explained the purpose of the visit. The Department's investigation included staff and outside source interviews, as well as facility, resident, and outside source records reviews. It was alleged the Licensee did not provide Resident 1 (R1) (see LIC 811 Confidential Names List for identification) their accorded refund upon discharge from the facility. An Outside Source 1 (OS1) interview and records review revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on February 2, 2022, subsequently R1 was voluntarily discharged on February 9, 2022, with no prior notice. Interviews and a facility and resident records review revealed the Licensee required a 30-day written notice to be eligible for a refund of unused rent money received post the 30-day date provided on the notice of relocthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231002121928
Oct 26, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 5, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee provided false advertisement. Licensee did not meet reporting requirements.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Debbie Correia conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the above listed complaint allegations. LPA Correia was greeted by Caregiver Anne Cabrejas, identified herself, and explained the purpose of the visit. A short time later RSC Rico arrived at the facility to conduct the visit. The Department's investigation included staff and outside source interviews, facility and outside source records reviews, and a facility tour. It was alleged the Licensee provided false advertisement. An outside source interview, facility record review, and a facility tour revealed Resident's 1 (R1’s) Responsible Party (RP) was provided a picture of the room R1 would be residing in prior to admission. A facility tour revealed although the picture appeared to be the same room, there was no comparison regarding the décor and/or appearance of the room depicted in the picture per LPA's observation during the facility tour. . Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 5, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231002121928
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations3typical 1
Substantiated complaints5typical 2
Total complaints5typical 7
State visits on file18typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20252202024451202333120221102021330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2024 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (619) 564-9660

Is Lakeside Manor licensed?

Yes — Lakeside Manor is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Lakeside (San Diego County): California license #374604472, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 17 residents. State records list 13 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated August 27, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Lakeside Manor care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Lakeside Manor with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordTHE FACILITY SERVES SEVENTEEN ELDERLY RESIDENTS; AGES 60 AND ABOVE; TWELEVE (12) NON-AMBULATORY AND FIVE (5) BEDRIDDEN; APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FIFTEEN (15).

How much does Lakeside Manor cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Lakeside Manor's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Lakeside Manor accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Lakeside Manor through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in San Diego County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

13 of 15 beds occupied (87%) when the state visited on July 3, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Lakeside Manor?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 18 state visits and 13 dated documents since 2021 for Lakeside Manor; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated July 3, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

5 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not issue required refund to resident's authorized representative.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Debbie Correia conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Herika Rico. It was alleged that the Licensee did not provide Resident 1’s (R1’s) Responsible Party (RP) a full refund after discharge from the facility. A records review revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on February 2, 2022, subsequently R1 was voluntarily discharged on February 9, 2022, with no prior notice. Interviews conducted with Outside Source 1 (OS1), Staff 1 (S1) and a facility records review revealed the facility issued the RP a refund in an amount meeting the Department’s mandate. An interview conducted with OS1, and a prior complaint filed against the facility, alleged the Admission Agreement did not meet California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, therefore there was no contractual agreement in place and Title 22 refund mandate was not warranted. [CDSS inspection report, July 3, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240429134128
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure that resident was properly clothed. Staff did not provide activities for residents.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dawn Segura conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigation findings. LPA was granted entry into the facility and met with Karina Ramirez, to whom she disclosed the reason for the visit. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above-listed complaint allegations. The investigation consisted of tours of the facility and interviews of facility staff and outside sources. It was reported that Resident 1 (R1) [LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to identify the resident] was observed seated in the living area of the facility with a top and a diaper on, but no bottom item of clothing. Interviews conducted during the investigation confirmed that, on occasions, staff would seat R1 in his/her wheelchair in the common area of the home with a top item of clothing and an adult brief with no bottom clothing or covering on. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 20, 2024 · control 08-AS-20230925150942
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect resulted in pressure injury Neglect resulted in malnourishment
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Iby Strong conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the above-mentioned allegations. LPA identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Owner Matthew DelBruegge. On January 8, 2024, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging neglect of Resident 1 (R1) resulted in pressure injury and neglect of R1 resulted in malnourishment. During the investigation, LPA Strong collected pertinent resident records as well as facility documentation and conducted interviews. According to R1’s Physician Report, dated January 17, 2023, R1 has a mild cognitive impairment, is non-ambulatory, is on a special diet due to dialysis, can follow instruction and can communicate needs. According to allegation, on January 3, 2024, R1 was observed to have pressure injuries on the elbow and sacral area in which staging had not been determined but were alleged to have occurred as a result of neglect. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 29, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240108103817

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not provide accorded refund. Licensee did not ensure removal of oxygen tanks from facility.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Debbie Correia conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA Correia was greeted by Caregiver Litzy Serrano and explained the purpose of the visit. The Department's investigation included staff and outside source interviews, as well as facility, resident, and outside source records reviews. It was alleged the Licensee did not provide Resident 1 (R1) (see LIC 811 Confidential Names List for identification) their accorded refund upon discharge from the facility. An Outside Source 1 (OS1) interview and records review revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on February 2, 2022, subsequently R1 was voluntarily discharged on February 9, 2022, with no prior notice. Interviews and a facility and resident records review revealed the Licensee required a 30-day written notice to be eligible for a refund of unused rent money received post the 30-day date provided on the notice of relocCDSS inspection report, December 12, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231002121928
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee provided false advertisement. Licensee did not meet reporting requirements.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Debbie Correia conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the above listed complaint allegations. LPA Correia was greeted by Caregiver Anne Cabrejas, identified herself, and explained the purpose of the visit. A short time later RSC Rico arrived at the facility to conduct the visit. The Department's investigation included staff and outside source interviews, facility and outside source records reviews, and a facility tour. It was alleged the Licensee provided false advertisement. An outside source interview, facility record review, and a facility tour revealed Resident's 1 (R1’s) Responsible Party (RP) was provided a picture of the room R1 would be residing in prior to admission. A facility tour revealed although the picture appeared to be the same room, there was no comparison regarding the décor and/or appearance of the room depicted in the picture per LPA's observation during the facility tour. . SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 5, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231002121928

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 18 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
5
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
5
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
18
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(619) 564-9660
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Lakeside Manor? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.