Vista Del Lago Memory Care is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Escondido, San Diego County, California — state license #374604274, licensed for 96 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 44 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated April 26, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

7 homes in view

Vista Del Lago Memory Care

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 96 residents · Escondido, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374604274, held since 2020 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1817 Avenida Del Diablo · Escondido, San Diego County
Phone
(760) 741-2888
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 96 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 35 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 10 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 96 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE CARE WAIVER FOR 35 RESIDENTS.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 46 times and filed 44 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated April 26, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 21, 2026
Occupancy at the August 22, 2025 visit
94 of 96 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 18 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 20, 2021 to August 22, 2025. 18 of the 18 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (6), “Unfounded” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (9). 18 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 18 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 26 of 44 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 3 documents
Apr 26, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 26, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20257 state visits · 10 documents
Dec 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained multiple fractures due to staff neglect.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver final findings for the above allegation. During today’s visit, the LPA met with Marie Hill, Executive Director and explained the reason for the visit. On 11/21/2023, the Riverside Adult and Senior Regional Office (RO) received a complaint regarding Neglect/Lack of Care and Supervision to Resident #1 (R1) resulting in chronic fractures in right wrist and right shoulder. According to information obtained during the Department’s investigation, R1 was admitted to the Vista Del Lago Memory Care facility on 01/22/2022. R1 needed little to no assistance with their activities of daily living (ADLs), however, R1 needed standby assistance when dressing, grooming and toileting. According to R1’s physician’s report, dated 01/19/2022, R1 was documented as ambulatory but could not independently transfer to and from bed. Although R1’s physician report, dated 10/02/2023, changed to indicate R1 was non-ambulthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 22, 2025 · control 18-AS-20231121112448
Jul 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff prevented the resident from enrolling in the Assisted Living Waiver (ALW) Program

On 7/29/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janette Romero conducted an unannounced visit at the facility to investigate the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Marie Hill who was informed of the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility, conducted interviews, and obtained copies of pertinent records. Regarding the allegation, “Staff prevented the resident from enrolling in the Assisted Living Waiver (ALW) Program” it was alleged Resident 1 (R1) required a lower level of care and facility staff denied R1 a more suitable housing option by failing to follow up on the Assisted Living Waiver (ALW) program status in a timely manner. During the visit, R1 was unavailable for an interview. LPA reviewed R1’s admission agreement dated 1/19/2023. LPA reviewed R1’s physician’s report dated 7/1/2025 noting R1 exhibits memory loss. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250723140804
Jun 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202410 state visits · 12 documents
Dec 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect

On 12/11/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Janette Romero arrived unannounced to deliver investigative findings regarding the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Marie Hill who was informed of the purpose of the visit. It was alleged Resident 1 (R1) sustained a cut on Sunday, 11/17/2024 and the facility did not seek appropriate medical attention. LPA reviewed R1’s Physician’s Report (LIC 602A) dated 1/5/2024 noting R1 exhibits confusion, wandering behavior, and is unable to communicate their needs or follow instructions. Facility staff on duty at the time of the discovery of the wound contacted Resident Services Director (RSD), Priscilla Bermudes for further instruction based on the severity of the wound. RSD was interviewed and reported on 11/17/2024, they received a phone call from facility staff reporting R1 was observed with an open area to their lower left leg. RSD added they also received a photograph of the wound and directed facility staff to not activatethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 11, 2024 · control 18-AS-20241125114737
Dec 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff failed to ensure resident's insulin orders were followed

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez arrived unannounced to the facility to initiate the investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Executive Director Marie Hill and explained the purpose of the visit. Complaint investigation consisted of a tour of the interior/exterior areas of the facility, interviews with staff and residents, and records review of requested pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation “Staff failed to ensure resident's insulin orders were followed” it was reported Resident One (R1) is not receiving insulin five times a day as prescribed by R1’s physician. Records review of R1’s Physician’s Orders reveal R1 is prescribed two separate insulin dosages in the morning, one insulin dosage in the afternoon, and two separate insulin dosages in the evening. Record review of R1’s Medication Administrator Record (MAR) for June 2024, July 2024, and August 2024 provides corroborating documentation of R1 receiving five shots of insulin prescribed by Rthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 4, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240829163133
Aug 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff are not ensuring that insulin is being administered in a safe manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude the investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Executive Director Marie Hill and explained the purpose of the visit. Complaint investigation consisted of a tour of the interior/exterior areas of the facility, interviews with staff and residents, and records review of requested pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation “Staff are not ensuring that insulin is being administered in a safe manner” it was reported Resident One (R1) receives insulin twice a day and staff are not checking R1’s blood sugar. Interview with Staff One (S1) reported R1 has a physician’s order stating R1’s blood glucose checks will be conducted one time a day on every Monday with a start date of 06/03/2024. LPA conducted a records review of R1’s order summary report that corroborates R1’s physician’s orders for blood glucose checks on Monday only. Records review of Medication Administrator Record (MAthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 26, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240619165645
May 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee not meeting the resident's care needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Executive Director, Marie Hill. During the investigation, records were reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff and outside sources. It was alleged the licensee was not meeting the needs of Resident #1 (R1). It was reported R1 was not kept clean, urinated on themselves, and was left in soaking wet clothing for an extended period, and was in pain from an untreated Stage II pressure injury. R1’s Physician’s Report dated 09/25/20 indicated R1 was incontinent of bladder, required assistance with bathing, dressing/grooming, and medication management. R1’s Service Plan dated 10/14/20 indicated R1 required assistance with showers on Tuesdays and Fridays, occasional assistance with transfers, and medication management. The Service Plan also reflected R1 was continent of bladder but required assistance with bowel incothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 18, 2024 · control 08-AS-20201106075652
Mar 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff’s lack of supervision resulted in resident sustaining multiple falls and hospitalization Staff left resident soiled on the floor

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings for the allegation noted above. LPA was granted entry and met with Executive Director Marie Hill and discussed the details pertaining to the complaint. Regarding the allegation “Staff’s lack of supervision resulted in resident sustaining multiple falls and hospitalization” it was reported Resident One (R1) had fallen multiple times resulting in hospitalization. Record review revealed R1 had four (4) unwitnessed falls on (01/04/2024, 12/14/2023, 12/01/2023, 11/28/2023) and one (1) witnessed fall on 01/03/2024. Falls from 01/04/2024 and 12/14/2023 required R1 to be taken to the hospital. A record review revealed that at the time of all 4 unwitnessed falls there was sufficient staffing with two (2) Med Tech and seven (7) Caregivers during both the AM and PM shifts and four (4) caregivers for overnight. The facility had a total of 89 residents during the time of the incidences noted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240129091639
Mar 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was sexually assaulted while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings for the allegation noted above. LPA was granted entry and met with Executive Director Marie Hill and discussed the details pertaining to the complaint. Regarding the allegation “Resident was sexually assaulted while in care”, it was reported an unknown individual entered Resident One’s (R1) room and attempted to abuse and hurt R1. Interview with LVN Alicia Anderson revealed the unknown individual is a resident, Resident Two (R2). On 02/23/2024, R1 was calling for help to assist R1’s roommate when R2 entered their room without R1’s consent and sat on R1’s bed. R1 yelled at R2 to get out of their room and R2 did not leave the room. R2 stated they wanted a kiss and R2 gestured with their hands to perform a sexual act. R1 began to push R2 out of their room with R1’s walker. Staff One (S1) arrived at R1’s room to assist with re-directing R2 back to their own room. S1 noted no injuriesthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240226114855
Feb 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff dropped resident during transfer. Facility did not notify responsible party of staff dropping resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Iby Strong conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the above-mentioned allegations. LPA identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Executive Director Marie Hill. On November 24, 2020, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging Resident 1 (R1) was dropped by facility staff and such fall was not reported to the responsible party. During the investigation, the Department collected pertinent resident records as well as facility documentation and conducted interviews. According to R1’s Physician Report, dated September 25, 2020, R1 has a mild cognitive impairment, is non-ambulatory, and requires minimal assistance with activities of daily living. R1’s Plan of Care dated October 10, 2020, states R1 requires assistance with transfers with verbal cueing. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 13, 2024 · control 08-AS-20201124123344
20231 state visit · 1 document
Sep 27, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations5typical 1
Substantiated complaints6typical 2
Total complaints26typical 7
State visits on file46typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2020.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262302025710020241012220234422022111322021220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2024 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (760) 741-2888

Is Vista Del Lago Memory Care licensed?

Yes — Vista Del Lago Memory Care is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Escondido (San Diego County): California license #374604274, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 96 residents. State records list 44 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated April 26, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Vista Del Lago Memory Care care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Vista Del Lago Memory Care with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 96 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE CARE WAIVER FOR 35 RESIDENTS.

How much does Vista Del Lago Memory Care cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Vista Del Lago Memory Care's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Vista Del Lago Memory Care accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Vista Del Lago Memory Care through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in San Diego County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

94 of 96 beds occupied (98%) when the state visited on August 22, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Vista Del Lago Memory Care?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 46 state visits and 44 dated documents since 2021 for Vista Del Lago Memory Care; 18 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated August 22, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

18 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained multiple fractures due to staff neglect.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver final findings for the above allegation. During today’s visit, the LPA met with Marie Hill, Executive Director and explained the reason for the visit. On 11/21/2023, the Riverside Adult and Senior Regional Office (RO) received a complaint regarding Neglect/Lack of Care and Supervision to Resident #1 (R1) resulting in chronic fractures in right wrist and right shoulder. According to information obtained during the Department’s investigation, R1 was admitted to the Vista Del Lago Memory Care facility on 01/22/2022. R1 needed little to no assistance with their activities of daily living (ADLs), however, R1 needed standby assistance when dressing, grooming and toileting. According to R1’s physician’s report, dated 01/19/2022, R1 was documented as ambulatory but could not independently transfer to and from bed. Although R1’s physician report, dated 10/02/2023, changed to indicate R1 was non-ambulCDSS inspection report, August 22, 2025 · control 18-AS-20231121112448
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff prevented the resident from enrolling in the Assisted Living Waiver (ALW) Program
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 7/29/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janette Romero conducted an unannounced visit at the facility to investigate the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Marie Hill who was informed of the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility, conducted interviews, and obtained copies of pertinent records. Regarding the allegation, “Staff prevented the resident from enrolling in the Assisted Living Waiver (ALW) Program” it was alleged Resident 1 (R1) required a lower level of care and facility staff denied R1 a more suitable housing option by failing to follow up on the Assisted Living Waiver (ALW) program status in a timely manner. During the visit, R1 was unavailable for an interview. LPA reviewed R1’s admission agreement dated 1/19/2023. LPA reviewed R1’s physician’s report dated 7/1/2025 noting R1 exhibits memory loss. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 29, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250723140804

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 12/11/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Janette Romero arrived unannounced to deliver investigative findings regarding the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Marie Hill who was informed of the purpose of the visit. It was alleged Resident 1 (R1) sustained a cut on Sunday, 11/17/2024 and the facility did not seek appropriate medical attention. LPA reviewed R1’s Physician’s Report (LIC 602A) dated 1/5/2024 noting R1 exhibits confusion, wandering behavior, and is unable to communicate their needs or follow instructions. Facility staff on duty at the time of the discovery of the wound contacted Resident Services Director (RSD), Priscilla Bermudes for further instruction based on the severity of the wound. RSD was interviewed and reported on 11/17/2024, they received a phone call from facility staff reporting R1 was observed with an open area to their lower left leg. RSD added they also received a photograph of the wound and directed facility staff to not activateCDSS inspection report, December 11, 2024 · control 18-AS-20241125114737
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff failed to ensure resident's insulin orders were followed
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez arrived unannounced to the facility to initiate the investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Executive Director Marie Hill and explained the purpose of the visit. Complaint investigation consisted of a tour of the interior/exterior areas of the facility, interviews with staff and residents, and records review of requested pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation “Staff failed to ensure resident's insulin orders were followed” it was reported Resident One (R1) is not receiving insulin five times a day as prescribed by R1’s physician. Records review of R1’s Physician’s Orders reveal R1 is prescribed two separate insulin dosages in the morning, one insulin dosage in the afternoon, and two separate insulin dosages in the evening. Record review of R1’s Medication Administrator Record (MAR) for June 2024, July 2024, and August 2024 provides corroborating documentation of R1 receiving five shots of insulin prescribed by RCDSS inspection report, September 4, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240829163133
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not ensuring that insulin is being administered in a safe manner.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude the investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Executive Director Marie Hill and explained the purpose of the visit. Complaint investigation consisted of a tour of the interior/exterior areas of the facility, interviews with staff and residents, and records review of requested pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation “Staff are not ensuring that insulin is being administered in a safe manner” it was reported Resident One (R1) receives insulin twice a day and staff are not checking R1’s blood sugar. Interview with Staff One (S1) reported R1 has a physician’s order stating R1’s blood glucose checks will be conducted one time a day on every Monday with a start date of 06/03/2024. LPA conducted a records review of R1’s order summary report that corroborates R1’s physician’s orders for blood glucose checks on Monday only. Records review of Medication Administrator Record (MACDSS inspection report, August 26, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240619165645
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee not meeting the resident's care needs
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Executive Director, Marie Hill. During the investigation, records were reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff and outside sources. It was alleged the licensee was not meeting the needs of Resident #1 (R1). It was reported R1 was not kept clean, urinated on themselves, and was left in soaking wet clothing for an extended period, and was in pain from an untreated Stage II pressure injury. R1’s Physician’s Report dated 09/25/20 indicated R1 was incontinent of bladder, required assistance with bathing, dressing/grooming, and medication management. R1’s Service Plan dated 10/14/20 indicated R1 required assistance with showers on Tuesdays and Fridays, occasional assistance with transfers, and medication management. The Service Plan also reflected R1 was continent of bladder but required assistance with bowel incoCDSS inspection report, April 18, 2024 · control 08-AS-20201106075652
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff’s lack of supervision resulted in resident sustaining multiple falls and hospitalization Staff left resident soiled on the floor
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings for the allegation noted above. LPA was granted entry and met with Executive Director Marie Hill and discussed the details pertaining to the complaint. Regarding the allegation “Staff’s lack of supervision resulted in resident sustaining multiple falls and hospitalization” it was reported Resident One (R1) had fallen multiple times resulting in hospitalization. Record review revealed R1 had four (4) unwitnessed falls on (01/04/2024, 12/14/2023, 12/01/2023, 11/28/2023) and one (1) witnessed fall on 01/03/2024. Falls from 01/04/2024 and 12/14/2023 required R1 to be taken to the hospital. A record review revealed that at the time of all 4 unwitnessed falls there was sufficient staffing with two (2) Med Tech and seven (7) Caregivers during both the AM and PM shifts and four (4) caregivers for overnight. The facility had a total of 89 residents during the time of the incidences noted.CDSS inspection report, March 21, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240129091639
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was sexually assaulted while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings for the allegation noted above. LPA was granted entry and met with Executive Director Marie Hill and discussed the details pertaining to the complaint. Regarding the allegation “Resident was sexually assaulted while in care”, it was reported an unknown individual entered Resident One’s (R1) room and attempted to abuse and hurt R1. Interview with LVN Alicia Anderson revealed the unknown individual is a resident, Resident Two (R2). On 02/23/2024, R1 was calling for help to assist R1’s roommate when R2 entered their room without R1’s consent and sat on R1’s bed. R1 yelled at R2 to get out of their room and R2 did not leave the room. R2 stated they wanted a kiss and R2 gestured with their hands to perform a sexual act. R1 began to push R2 out of their room with R1’s walker. Staff One (S1) arrived at R1’s room to assist with re-directing R2 back to their own room. S1 noted no injuriesCDSS inspection report, March 21, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240226114855
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff dropped resident during transfer. Facility did not notify responsible party of staff dropping resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Iby Strong conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the above-mentioned allegations. LPA identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Executive Director Marie Hill. On November 24, 2020, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging Resident 1 (R1) was dropped by facility staff and such fall was not reported to the responsible party. During the investigation, the Department collected pertinent resident records as well as facility documentation and conducted interviews. According to R1’s Physician Report, dated September 25, 2020, R1 has a mild cognitive impairment, is non-ambulatory, and requires minimal assistance with activities of daily living. R1’s Plan of Care dated October 10, 2020, states R1 requires assistance with transfers with verbal cueing. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 13, 2024 · control 08-AS-20201124123344

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not distribute medications to resident as prescribed
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings for the allegatios listed noted above. LPA met with Johnathan Thomas, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. The allegations were investigated, the investigation consisted of observation, interviews and a review of pertinent documentation pertaining to the complaint. Regarding the allegation of staff did not distribute medications to resident as prescribed. The department received an SIR on August 16, 2022, reporting an incident that occurred on August 10, 2022 regarding, Resident #1 (R1) not receiving their anti seizure medication and having to be sent out via 9-11. At the time of the complaint the usual time given was between 8am-8:30am. Staff reported that there was a delay with the medication being delivered due to the delivery service not delivering the medication on time. A review of R1's medication administration recoCDSS inspection report, June 15, 2023 · control 18-AS-20220815085156
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not administer medications correctly
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tricia Danielson arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude an investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Executive Director Johnathan Thomas and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation "Facility did not administer medications correctly", it was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was provided a presciption of Plaxovid as ordered. Review of R1's Physician's Orders revealed R1 was prescribed Plaxovid 2 tablets twice a day for 5 days on December 3, 2022. Review of R1's Medication Administrator Records (MARs) revealed R1 was not given Plaxovid on 12/4/22 because it had not yet been delivered from the pharmacy. There was no documentation done to show it as given or not given on 12/5/2022 AM but the MARs indicated Plaxovid was given 12/5/22 at 8:00 PM. No documentation was completed to show it was given or not given on 12/6/22 and it was documented on 12/7/22 and 12/8/22 that it was not given because it had not been deliCDSS inspection report, March 22, 2023 · control 18-AS-20230106122510

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 46 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
5
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
6
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
26
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
46
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(760) 741-2888
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Vista Del Lago Memory Care? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.