Stellar Care is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego, San Diego County, California — state license #374603625, licensed for 150 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 32 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 11, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

9 homes in view

Stellar Care

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 150 residents · San Diego, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careBedriddenHospice not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374603625, held since 2015 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
4518 54th Street · San Diego, San Diego County
Phone
(619) 287-2920
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryVerified in record
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careVerified in record

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
FACILITY SERVES ONE-HUNDRED AND FIFTY (150), NON-AMBULATORY ELDERLY RESIDENTS; AGES 60 AND ABOVE. TEN (10) OF WHOM MAY BE BEDRIDDEN TO BE HOUSED IN BEDROOMS 1002-1014 ONLY. HOPSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR THIRTY (30) RESIDENTS.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 37 times and filed 32 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated May 11, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 11, 2026
Occupancy at the November 10, 2025 visit
104 of 150 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 20 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 29, 2021 to November 10, 2025. 20 of the 20 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (17). 20 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 20 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 28 of 32 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 3 documents
May 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 11, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202510 state visits · 12 documents
Nov 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not follow doctor's orders Staff do not ensure resident is receiving medication as prescribed Staff did not ensure resident's representative was notified of resident's change in condition in a timely manner

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Brandon Cho The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, and outside sources, as well as a review of resident records, including physician’s orders, Medication Administration Records (MARs), progress notes, and care plans. Resident #1 (R1) is an 84-year-old resident admitted to the facility on November 9, 2019, with diagnoses including Alzheimer’s Disease, depression, insomnia, and diabetes. R1 is non-ambulatory, visually impaired, and requires assistance with all activities of daily living, including medication and insulin administration. She is at high risk for falls and receives night supervision due to confusion and wandering. R1 is unable to self-administer medications and requires ongoingthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 10, 2025 · control 08-AS-20251022081308
Oct 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not dispose of an injection needle as required.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Brandon Cho. On 10/20/2025, it was alleged that Licensee did not dispose of an injection needle as required. More specifically, the Reporting Party (RP) observed that the insulin pen still had a used needle attached without a safety cap. RP expressed concern that staff may have failed to properly dispose of the used needle. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, review of relevant records, and observation of facility practices. (Continued on LIC 9099) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 30, 2025 · control 08-AS-20251020125636
Oct 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee pursued unlawful eviction of resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver a finding regarding the above prior complaint allegation. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Assisted Living Director Annelie Damasco. The Complainant alleged that Licensee pursued unlawful eviction of Resident #1 (R1). [See LIC 811 Confidential Names List for a description of R1.] CCLD’s investigation involved multiple unannounced facility tours/welfare checks and interviews of R1 and their relevant housemates/peers, facility staff, and outside sources. The Department also reviewed pertinent administrative, care, and medical records and E-mail correspondence. On 10/03/2025, Licensee served R1 with a 30-day eviction notice letter. The basis/reason for the eviction was R1’s breaking of facility house rules, to include “verbal or physical abuse towards other residents,” “use of profanity or other offensive language,” and “antisocial behaviothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 16, 2025 · control 08-AS-20251007092109
Jul 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not communicate with responsible party regarding resident's care. Staff are not properly supervising a resident who is a fall risk.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced complaint visit to further invisitage and delivered findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Executive Director Brandon Cho and stated the purpose of the visit. On June 23, 2025, it was alleged that Staff did not communicate with responsible party regarding resident's care. More specifically, Licensee staff will not communicate with Resident #1(R1) medical power of attorney(POA) when they ask for information about R1 over the phone. A review of facility records and Interviews with R1's responsible party reveal that communication between the facility staff and the responsible party, who is also the POA, occurs frequently. R1's responsible party stated they have no concerns regarding communication with the staff. Based on the information obtained, the facility appears to be following appropriate protocol by limiting the disclosure of personal health informationthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250623125909
Jul 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Lack of supervision resulted in resident eloping

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced complaint visit to open a complaint investigation. While at the facility LPA investigated and delivered findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Executive Director Brandon Cho and stated the purpose of the visit. On May 23, 2025, it was alleged that Lack of supervision resulted in resident eloping. The Department’s investigation consisted of file review and interview with staff. LPAs review of the initial compliant interview with staff, along with a review of records for Resident #1(R1) revealed R1 can leave the facility unassisted without restriction. Based on the Department’s investigation of the above-mentioned allegations and the evidence obtained from staff interviews and records review, we have found that the complaint was unfounded. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Cho, to whom a copy of this report, and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LICthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 29, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250523144232
May 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not respond to resident's call light in a timely manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation(s). LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Brandon Cho. On 04/4/2025, it was alleged that staff did not answer residents' call signal requests in a timely manner. More specificaly, staff did not respond for thirty minutes to call light assistance, once staff responded staff indicated they would return but never returned. The Department's investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and LPA direct observations. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 13, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250404123520
Apr 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff left resident in a soiled diaper for a long period of time.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility to deliver the findings of a complaint on the above-mentioned allegation. Upon arrival, LPA Rodgers identified herself and met with Administrator Brandon Cho to address the purpose of her visit. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegation. The investigation included a facility tour, record review, interviews with key staff, and an outside source. (Continued 9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 3, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250206104231
Jan 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent residents from engaging in inappropriate interactions Staff did not prevent resident from verbally harassing other resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself to, was greeted by, and explained the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Brandon Cho. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with outside sources, residents and staff, records review, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that the staff did not prevent residents from engaging in inappropriate interaction and Staff did not prevent resident from verbally harassing other resident in care. [Continued on 9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2025 · control 08-AS-20241001152941
Jan 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not allow resident to have visitors

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Amy Rodgers and Arian Golbakhsh conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility to open a complaint on the above-mentioned allegation. LPAs gained access to the facility, identified themselves, and met with Administrator Brandon Cho to discuss the purpose of the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of review of a resident file, interviews with staff, a resident as well as interviews with outside sources. It was alleged that Licensee did not allow resident to have visitors. Interviews with outside sources, staff and Resident #1 (R1) [See LIC 811 Confidential Names List for a description of R1.] confirmed that R1 does have a visitor restriction. The Licensee representative and R1’s responsible party deemed R1's visitor is disruptive and poses a threat to R1, staff, and other residents in care. Interviews with Licensee representative and R1 responsible party indicates the licensee representative clearly communicated their visitation pothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 7, 2025 · control 08-AS-20241230155843
Jan 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20247 state visits · 8 documents
Nov 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure that residents' dietary needs are met

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility to open a complaint on the above-mentioned allegation. LPA gained access to the facility, identified herself, and met with Administrator Brandon Cho to discuss the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted the investigation visit and was able to interview facility staff, and outside sources. LPA also reviewed records and conducted a physical inspection of the facility which included the kitchen as well as meal service. It was alleged that the licensee does not ensure that residents' dietary needs are met. Records review revealed 31 of 103 residents have a special need and/or preferred diets and the licensee is able to accommodate the special needs diets as well as the preferred diets. Record reviews indicate the last consultant dietitian report was dated 7/17/24 and no concerns were noted. (Continued on 1099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2024 · control 08-AS-20241002140953
Jul 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee staff handled resident roughly.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA was met by Executive Director Linda Cho and Administrator Brandon Cho, and was granted entry into the facility to discussed the purpose of the visit. Investigation consisted of interviews with residents, staff, outside sources, and review of facility records. It was alleged that Staff handled resident roughly. [ Continued on 9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 23, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240617110630
Jun 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff neglect resulted in wounds to resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena initiated an investigation regarding the above-mentioned complaint. LPA introduced and identified himself and was allowed into the facility. LPA met with Carrie Lopez, Community Relations Director and discussed with her the elements of the complaint. On 02/21/2024, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint alleging staff neglect resulted in resident’s wound. An outside source reported that upon arrival to a local hospital, Resident 1 (R1) was observed to have two lesions/wounds. The wounds were observed on the resident’s right shoulder and right hip. The outside source reported concerns that the wounds were infected. The Department’s investigation included interviews with staff, outside sources, review of records, and a visit to the facility. The Department was unable to interview R1. Facility records revealed that on 02/16/2024, R1 was found by staff laying on the floor of their room. Staff responded to assist and observethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 1, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240221105822
Jan 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20234 state visits · 5 documents
Nov 29, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not provide resident with a 60 day notice of fee increase. Licensee charged unlawful additional fee. Licensee did not assess resident for a higher level of care. Licensee did not ensure resident's shower was clean. Licensee did not meet food service requirements.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Administrator Linda Cho. On 10/27/23 it was alleged that the Licensee did not provide a resident with a 60 day notice of fee increase, Licensee charged an unlawful additional fee, Licensee did not assess a resident for a higher level of care, Licensee did not ensure a resident's shower was clean, and Licensee did not meet food service requirements. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and LPA direct observations. (Continued on LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 29, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231027145433
Nov 29, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not administer medication as prescribed.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to initiate and deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Linda Cho, Administrator. On 11/22/23 it was alleged that the Licensee did not administer medication as prescribed by neglecting to include a resident's full medication regimen for an out-of-facility visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, review of facility records, and interviews with facility staff, residents, and outside sources. Staff interview did not corroborate the allegation, as no staff advised being aware that the incident occurred, including the named staff witness. Resident interview, including the resident in question, revealed no concerns regarding medication administration at the facility; residents stated they received their medications on time and correctly. Outside sources interviewed did not express concernsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 29, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231122081655
Nov 21, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not treat resident with dignity and respect Staff did not meet resident's dietary needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA met with Administrator, Linda Cho and shared findings. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegations. The investigation consisted of observations, a review of relevant records, and interviews with facility staff, residents, and outside sources. On October 18, 2023, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that facility staff did not treat a resident (R1) with dignity and respect. [an LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to staff to identify the resident]. It was specifically alleged that on October 16, 2023, R1 communicated to an outside source that kitchen staff had told R1, they “needed to eat what they served” them “or starve”. ”. Additional details of when this alleged incident occurred, or which staff were involved, were not disclosed during the course of the investigation. (Continue at LIC9099C) Unthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 21, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231018113626
Oct 18, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not meet resident's toileting needs

On 10/18/2023, at about 1:07 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA identified himself and discussed the allegation mentioned above with Brandon Cho, Assistant Administrator. On 10/9/2023, the Department received a complaint, alleging a resident was not receiving timely toileting assistance from staff. The Department’s investigation consisted of LPA observation, record reviews, and interviews with residents, staff and outside sources. A sample of residents were interviewed. Each resident was cognizant, organized and verbally able to communicate with LPA. Residents advised LPA that they are satisfied with the responsiveness of staff. The residents said they’ve not been told by other residents nor witnessed untimely assistance and care. Residents said they had no complaints about anything about the facility. Staff interviews detailed the procedures for providing resident incontinent care. LPA reviewed Resithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 18, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231009153315
Sep 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Lack of supervision resulted in inappropriate behavior

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Assistant Administrator, Brandon Cho and Resident Services Coordinator, Mai Truong. During today’s visit, LPA briefly toured the facility, requested records, and interviewed staff and residents. It was alleged that lack of supervision resulted in inappropriate behavior. The facility’s population are residents that have a diagnosis of Major Neurocognitive Disorder. It was reported Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2 (R2) had an inappropriate interaction, the date and time are unknown. R1 has a bathroom located in their bedroom but it’s been inoperable for months. Facility staff interviews revealed R1 has a history of throwing items in the toilet causing it to clog. Therefore, the facility installed a lock on R1’s bathroom door that requires a code, which R1 does not have access to. R1 is made to use the public bathroom down the hall. It was also reportthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 28, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230922092654
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations4typical 1
Substantiated complaints4typical 2
Total complaints21typical 7
State visits on file37typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2015.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262302025101212024781202345020221102021330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (619) 287-2920

Is Stellar Care licensed?

Yes — Stellar Care is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego (San Diego County): California license #374603625, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 150 residents. State records list 32 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 11, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Stellar Care care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Stellar Care with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and bedridden; it does not list hospice care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordFACILITY SERVES ONE-HUNDRED AND FIFTY (150), NON-AMBULATORY ELDERLY RESIDENTS; AGES 60 AND ABOVE. TEN (10) OF WHOM MAY BE BEDRIDDEN TO BE HOUSED IN BEDROOMS 1002-1014 ONLY. HOPSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR THIRTY (30) RESIDENTS.

How much does Stellar Care cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Stellar Care's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Stellar Care accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Stellar Care through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in San Diego County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

104 of 150 beds occupied (69%) when the state visited on November 10, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Stellar Care?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 37 state visits and 32 dated documents since 2021 for Stellar Care; 20 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated November 10, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

20 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not follow doctor's orders Staff do not ensure resident is receiving medication as prescribed Staff did not ensure resident's representative was notified of resident's change in condition in a timely manner
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Brandon Cho The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, and outside sources, as well as a review of resident records, including physician’s orders, Medication Administration Records (MARs), progress notes, and care plans. Resident #1 (R1) is an 84-year-old resident admitted to the facility on November 9, 2019, with diagnoses including Alzheimer’s Disease, depression, insomnia, and diabetes. R1 is non-ambulatory, visually impaired, and requires assistance with all activities of daily living, including medication and insulin administration. She is at high risk for falls and receives night supervision due to confusion and wandering. R1 is unable to self-administer medications and requires ongoingCDSS inspection report, November 10, 2025 · control 08-AS-20251022081308
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not dispose of an injection needle as required.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Brandon Cho. On 10/20/2025, it was alleged that Licensee did not dispose of an injection needle as required. More specifically, the Reporting Party (RP) observed that the insulin pen still had a used needle attached without a safety cap. RP expressed concern that staff may have failed to properly dispose of the used needle. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, review of relevant records, and observation of facility practices. (Continued on LIC 9099) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 30, 2025 · control 08-AS-20251020125636
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee pursued unlawful eviction of resident.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver a finding regarding the above prior complaint allegation. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Assisted Living Director Annelie Damasco. The Complainant alleged that Licensee pursued unlawful eviction of Resident #1 (R1). [See LIC 811 Confidential Names List for a description of R1.] CCLD’s investigation involved multiple unannounced facility tours/welfare checks and interviews of R1 and their relevant housemates/peers, facility staff, and outside sources. The Department also reviewed pertinent administrative, care, and medical records and E-mail correspondence. On 10/03/2025, Licensee served R1 with a 30-day eviction notice letter. The basis/reason for the eviction was R1’s breaking of facility house rules, to include “verbal or physical abuse towards other residents,” “use of profanity or other offensive language,” and “antisocial behavioCDSS inspection report, October 16, 2025 · control 08-AS-20251007092109
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not communicate with responsible party regarding resident's care. Staff are not properly supervising a resident who is a fall risk.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced complaint visit to further invisitage and delivered findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Executive Director Brandon Cho and stated the purpose of the visit. On June 23, 2025, it was alleged that Staff did not communicate with responsible party regarding resident's care. More specifically, Licensee staff will not communicate with Resident #1(R1) medical power of attorney(POA) when they ask for information about R1 over the phone. A review of facility records and Interviews with R1's responsible party reveal that communication between the facility staff and the responsible party, who is also the POA, occurs frequently. R1's responsible party stated they have no concerns regarding communication with the staff. Based on the information obtained, the facility appears to be following appropriate protocol by limiting the disclosure of personal health informationCDSS inspection report, July 18, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250623125909
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedLack of supervision resulted in resident eloping
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced complaint visit to open a complaint investigation. While at the facility LPA investigated and delivered findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Executive Director Brandon Cho and stated the purpose of the visit. On May 23, 2025, it was alleged that Lack of supervision resulted in resident eloping. The Department’s investigation consisted of file review and interview with staff. LPAs review of the initial compliant interview with staff, along with a review of records for Resident #1(R1) revealed R1 can leave the facility unassisted without restriction. Based on the Department’s investigation of the above-mentioned allegations and the evidence obtained from staff interviews and records review, we have found that the complaint was unfounded. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Cho, to whom a copy of this report, and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LICCDSS inspection report, May 29, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250523144232
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not respond to resident's call light in a timely manner.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation(s). LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Brandon Cho. On 04/4/2025, it was alleged that staff did not answer residents' call signal requests in a timely manner. More specificaly, staff did not respond for thirty minutes to call light assistance, once staff responded staff indicated they would return but never returned. The Department's investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and LPA direct observations. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 13, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250404123520
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff left resident in a soiled diaper for a long period of time.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility to deliver the findings of a complaint on the above-mentioned allegation. Upon arrival, LPA Rodgers identified herself and met with Administrator Brandon Cho to address the purpose of her visit. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegation. The investigation included a facility tour, record review, interviews with key staff, and an outside source. (Continued 9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 3, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250206104231
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent residents from engaging in inappropriate interactions Staff did not prevent resident from verbally harassing other resident in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself to, was greeted by, and explained the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Brandon Cho. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with outside sources, residents and staff, records review, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that the staff did not prevent residents from engaging in inappropriate interaction and Staff did not prevent resident from verbally harassing other resident in care. [Continued on 9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 14, 2025 · control 08-AS-20241001152941
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not allow resident to have visitors
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Amy Rodgers and Arian Golbakhsh conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility to open a complaint on the above-mentioned allegation. LPAs gained access to the facility, identified themselves, and met with Administrator Brandon Cho to discuss the purpose of the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of review of a resident file, interviews with staff, a resident as well as interviews with outside sources. It was alleged that Licensee did not allow resident to have visitors. Interviews with outside sources, staff and Resident #1 (R1) [See LIC 811 Confidential Names List for a description of R1.] confirmed that R1 does have a visitor restriction. The Licensee representative and R1’s responsible party deemed R1's visitor is disruptive and poses a threat to R1, staff, and other residents in care. Interviews with Licensee representative and R1 responsible party indicates the licensee representative clearly communicated their visitation poCDSS inspection report, January 7, 2025 · control 08-AS-20241230155843

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure that residents' dietary needs are met
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility to open a complaint on the above-mentioned allegation. LPA gained access to the facility, identified herself, and met with Administrator Brandon Cho to discuss the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted the investigation visit and was able to interview facility staff, and outside sources. LPA also reviewed records and conducted a physical inspection of the facility which included the kitchen as well as meal service. It was alleged that the licensee does not ensure that residents' dietary needs are met. Records review revealed 31 of 103 residents have a special need and/or preferred diets and the licensee is able to accommodate the special needs diets as well as the preferred diets. Record reviews indicate the last consultant dietitian report was dated 7/17/24 and no concerns were noted. (Continued on 1099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 3, 2024 · control 08-AS-20241002140953
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee staff handled resident roughly.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA was met by Executive Director Linda Cho and Administrator Brandon Cho, and was granted entry into the facility to discussed the purpose of the visit. Investigation consisted of interviews with residents, staff, outside sources, and review of facility records. It was alleged that Staff handled resident roughly. [ Continued on 9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 23, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240617110630
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff neglect resulted in wounds to resident
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena initiated an investigation regarding the above-mentioned complaint. LPA introduced and identified himself and was allowed into the facility. LPA met with Carrie Lopez, Community Relations Director and discussed with her the elements of the complaint. On 02/21/2024, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint alleging staff neglect resulted in resident’s wound. An outside source reported that upon arrival to a local hospital, Resident 1 (R1) was observed to have two lesions/wounds. The wounds were observed on the resident’s right shoulder and right hip. The outside source reported concerns that the wounds were infected. The Department’s investigation included interviews with staff, outside sources, review of records, and a visit to the facility. The Department was unable to interview R1. Facility records revealed that on 02/16/2024, R1 was found by staff laying on the floor of their room. Staff responded to assist and observeCDSS inspection report, March 1, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240221105822

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not provide resident with a 60 day notice of fee increase. Licensee charged unlawful additional fee. Licensee did not assess resident for a higher level of care. Licensee did not ensure resident's shower was clean. Licensee did not meet food service requirements.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Administrator Linda Cho. On 10/27/23 it was alleged that the Licensee did not provide a resident with a 60 day notice of fee increase, Licensee charged an unlawful additional fee, Licensee did not assess a resident for a higher level of care, Licensee did not ensure a resident's shower was clean, and Licensee did not meet food service requirements. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and LPA direct observations. (Continued on LIC9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 29, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231027145433
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not administer medication as prescribed.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to initiate and deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Linda Cho, Administrator. On 11/22/23 it was alleged that the Licensee did not administer medication as prescribed by neglecting to include a resident's full medication regimen for an out-of-facility visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, review of facility records, and interviews with facility staff, residents, and outside sources. Staff interview did not corroborate the allegation, as no staff advised being aware that the incident occurred, including the named staff witness. Resident interview, including the resident in question, revealed no concerns regarding medication administration at the facility; residents stated they received their medications on time and correctly. Outside sources interviewed did not express concernsCDSS inspection report, November 29, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231122081655
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not treat resident with dignity and respect Staff did not meet resident's dietary needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA met with Administrator, Linda Cho and shared findings. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegations. The investigation consisted of observations, a review of relevant records, and interviews with facility staff, residents, and outside sources. On October 18, 2023, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that facility staff did not treat a resident (R1) with dignity and respect. [an LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to staff to identify the resident]. It was specifically alleged that on October 16, 2023, R1 communicated to an outside source that kitchen staff had told R1, they “needed to eat what they served” them “or starve”. ”. Additional details of when this alleged incident occurred, or which staff were involved, were not disclosed during the course of the investigation. (Continue at LIC9099C) UnCDSS inspection report, November 21, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231018113626
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not meet resident's toileting needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/18/2023, at about 1:07 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA identified himself and discussed the allegation mentioned above with Brandon Cho, Assistant Administrator. On 10/9/2023, the Department received a complaint, alleging a resident was not receiving timely toileting assistance from staff. The Department’s investigation consisted of LPA observation, record reviews, and interviews with residents, staff and outside sources. A sample of residents were interviewed. Each resident was cognizant, organized and verbally able to communicate with LPA. Residents advised LPA that they are satisfied with the responsiveness of staff. The residents said they’ve not been told by other residents nor witnessed untimely assistance and care. Residents said they had no complaints about anything about the facility. Staff interviews detailed the procedures for providing resident incontinent care. LPA reviewed ResiCDSS inspection report, October 18, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231009153315
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLack of supervision resulted in inappropriate behavior
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Assistant Administrator, Brandon Cho and Resident Services Coordinator, Mai Truong. During today’s visit, LPA briefly toured the facility, requested records, and interviewed staff and residents. It was alleged that lack of supervision resulted in inappropriate behavior. The facility’s population are residents that have a diagnosis of Major Neurocognitive Disorder. It was reported Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2 (R2) had an inappropriate interaction, the date and time are unknown. R1 has a bathroom located in their bedroom but it’s been inoperable for months. Facility staff interviews revealed R1 has a history of throwing items in the toilet causing it to clog. Therefore, the facility installed a lock on R1’s bathroom door that requires a code, which R1 does not have access to. R1 is made to use the public bathroom down the hall. It was also reportCDSS inspection report, September 28, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230922092654

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 37 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
4
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
4
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
21
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
37
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(619) 287-2920
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Stellar Care? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.