Sunrise At La Costa is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Carlsbad, San Diego County, California — state license #374601134, licensed for 120 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 19 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated December 17, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

7 homes in view

Sunrise At La Costa

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 120 residents · Carlsbad, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374601134, held since 2001 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
7020 Manzanita St · Carlsbad, San Diego County
Phone
(760) 930-0060
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 120 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 15 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
FACILITY SERVES 120 ELDERLY RESIDENTS, 60 YEARS AND ABOVE; ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY AND FIFTEEN (15) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. FACILITY'S TERRACE LEVEL MAY SERVE UP TO 30 DEMENTIA RESIDENTS AND HAS APPROVED DELAYED EGRESS. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20 RESIDENTS.State service designation985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 20 times and filed 19 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on December 17, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
December 17, 2025
Occupancy at that visit
86 of 120 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 10 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 28, 2022 to December 17, 2025. 10 of the 10 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (7). 10 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 10 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 12 of 19 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20255 state visits · 7 documents
Dec 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff obtained outside services for the resident without prior authorization Staff did not properly supervise the resident Staff did not get resident appraisal updated

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Becky Kennedy conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was granted entry to the facility after identifying herself. LPA met with Jennifer Ortega, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit The Department’s investigation consisted of review of facility records, outside source records, and interviews of facility staff and outside sources. The allegations in this complaint all involve Resident 1 (R1). The investigation revealed R1’s mental wellbeing was of some concern prior to admission, including a period of psychiatric hospitalization about a month prior to admission. The initial assessment for R1 noted a mood of sadness and the facility staff would encourage R1 to express their feelings and concerns during mood changes Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 17, 2025 · control 08-AS-20221005150217
Nov 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff are not providing resident with assitance with activities of daily living Staff are not administrating medication as prescribed

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Iby Strong made an unannounced visit to open an investigation on the above mentioned allegations. LPA identified herself and disclosed the purpose of her visit. LPA met with Executive Director Jennifer Ortega and discussed the basic elements of the complaint According to allegations, Resident 1 (R1) did not get assistance with activities of daily living and R1 did not receive medication as prescribed. During the visit, LPA Strong was able to establish that Resident 1 (R1) is not and was not a resident of this facility. Therefore the complaint is unfounded. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of Licensee's Rights along with a copy of this report was provided to Executive Director Jennifer Ortega. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250930090346
Sep 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect/lack of supervision resulted in a resident-on-resident altercation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hannah Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to initiate and deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Jennifer Ortega. On March 6, 2025, it was alleged that Neglect/Lack of Supervision resulted in a resident-on-resident altercation. It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) hit Resident #2 (R2) in the back twice while getting onto the elevator at the facility [See LIC811 Confidential Name List for identification of select person identifiers used in this report]. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, records review, and staff, resident, and outside source interviews. [Continued on LIC9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250306150642
Mar 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 27, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigation findings. LPA was granted entry into the facility and met with Executive Director (ED) Arguero Hernandez , to whom she disclosed the reason for the visit. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegation. The investigation consisted of LPA observation, records review and interviews with facility staff and outside sources. According to records review a LIC621 (Resident Personal Property and Valuables Inventory) was in R1's facility file however, the document was not completed. According to interviews with R1's responsible party (RP) the Licensee did not present the LIC621 document at time of move in or during contractual presentation. Therefore, no residential personal property and valuables were inventoried at time of move in. (Continued on 9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 27, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240822162042
Sep 27, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not issue resident’s authorized representative a timely refund.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigation findings. LPA was granted entry into the facility and met with Executive Director Arguero Hernandez, to whom she disclosed the reason for the visit. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegation. The investigation consisted of LPA observation, records review and interviews with facility staff and outside sources. On 8/27/2024 it was alleged that the Licensee did not provide Resident 1’s (R1’s) Responsible Party (RP) a full refund after the death of a resident. A records review revealed R1’s RP was issued a full refund of the original pre-paid rent within 15 days the removal of all personal belongs belonging of R1. The full refund was issued on 5/7/2024. The records also indicate an automatic ACH withdrawal was also made on 5/6/2024 from R1’s personal account. Further records reviewed as well as interview with S1 indicates there was an accounting oversight from thethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 27, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240827140738
Mar 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not make available for public viewing a licensing report from the preceding 12 months.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Marlen Arguero-Hernandez. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, records review, and LPA observations. It was alleged that the Licensee did not make available for public viewing a licensing report from the preceding 12 months. LPA observations, corroborated by staff interview and records review, revealed that public licensing reports and/or information regarding how to obtain them, were not made available to residents and visitors. LPA directly observed the concierge station and required postings during two (2) unannounced facility visits; LPA did not observe any Licensing reports or signs informing of how to view a report. Interview with front desk staff revealed admissions that staff did not knthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 29, 2024 · control 08-AS-20230710094552
20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 27, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations1typical 1
Substantiated complaints1typical 2
Total complaints10typical 7
State visits on file20typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2001.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20255702024341202356020221102021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2024 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (760) 930-0060

Is Sunrise At La Costa licensed?

Yes — Sunrise At La Costa is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Carlsbad (San Diego County): California license #374601134, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 120 residents. State records list 19 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated December 17, 2025, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Sunrise At La Costa care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Sunrise At La Costa with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordFACILITY SERVES 120 ELDERLY RESIDENTS, 60 YEARS AND ABOVE; ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY AND FIFTEEN (15) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. FACILITY'S TERRACE LEVEL MAY SERVE UP TO 30 DEMENTIA RESIDENTS AND HAS APPROVED DELAYED EGRESS. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20 RESIDENTS.

How much does Sunrise At La Costa cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Sunrise At La Costa's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Sunrise At La Costa accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Sunrise At La Costa is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

86 of 120 beds occupied (72%) when the state visited on December 17, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Sunrise At La Costa?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 20 state visits and 19 dated documents since 2021 for Sunrise At La Costa; 10 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 17, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

10 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff obtained outside services for the resident without prior authorization Staff did not properly supervise the resident Staff did not get resident appraisal updated
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Becky Kennedy conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was granted entry to the facility after identifying herself. LPA met with Jennifer Ortega, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit The Department’s investigation consisted of review of facility records, outside source records, and interviews of facility staff and outside sources. The allegations in this complaint all involve Resident 1 (R1). The investigation revealed R1’s mental wellbeing was of some concern prior to admission, including a period of psychiatric hospitalization about a month prior to admission. The initial assessment for R1 noted a mood of sadness and the facility staff would encourage R1 to express their feelings and concerns during mood changes UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 17, 2025 · control 08-AS-20221005150217
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not providing resident with assitance with activities of daily living Staff are not administrating medication as prescribed
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Iby Strong made an unannounced visit to open an investigation on the above mentioned allegations. LPA identified herself and disclosed the purpose of her visit. LPA met with Executive Director Jennifer Ortega and discussed the basic elements of the complaint According to allegations, Resident 1 (R1) did not get assistance with activities of daily living and R1 did not receive medication as prescribed. During the visit, LPA Strong was able to establish that Resident 1 (R1) is not and was not a resident of this facility. Therefore the complaint is unfounded. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of Licensee's Rights along with a copy of this report was provided to Executive Director Jennifer Ortega. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, October 7, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250930090346
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect/lack of supervision resulted in a resident-on-resident altercation
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hannah Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to initiate and deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Jennifer Ortega. On March 6, 2025, it was alleged that Neglect/Lack of Supervision resulted in a resident-on-resident altercation. It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) hit Resident #2 (R2) in the back twice while getting onto the elevator at the facility [See LIC811 Confidential Name List for identification of select person identifiers used in this report]. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, records review, and staff, resident, and outside source interviews. [Continued on LIC9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 12, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250306150642

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigation findings. LPA was granted entry into the facility and met with Executive Director (ED) Arguero Hernandez , to whom she disclosed the reason for the visit. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegation. The investigation consisted of LPA observation, records review and interviews with facility staff and outside sources. According to records review a LIC621 (Resident Personal Property and Valuables Inventory) was in R1's facility file however, the document was not completed. According to interviews with R1's responsible party (RP) the Licensee did not present the LIC621 document at time of move in or during contractual presentation. Therefore, no residential personal property and valuables were inventoried at time of move in. (Continued on 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 27, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240822162042
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not issue resident’s authorized representative a timely refund.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigation findings. LPA was granted entry into the facility and met with Executive Director Arguero Hernandez, to whom she disclosed the reason for the visit. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegation. The investigation consisted of LPA observation, records review and interviews with facility staff and outside sources. On 8/27/2024 it was alleged that the Licensee did not provide Resident 1’s (R1’s) Responsible Party (RP) a full refund after the death of a resident. A records review revealed R1’s RP was issued a full refund of the original pre-paid rent within 15 days the removal of all personal belongs belonging of R1. The full refund was issued on 5/7/2024. The records also indicate an automatic ACH withdrawal was also made on 5/6/2024 from R1’s personal account. Further records reviewed as well as interview with S1 indicates there was an accounting oversight from theCDSS inspection report, September 27, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240827140738
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not make available for public viewing a licensing report from the preceding 12 months.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Marlen Arguero-Hernandez. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, records review, and LPA observations. It was alleged that the Licensee did not make available for public viewing a licensing report from the preceding 12 months. LPA observations, corroborated by staff interview and records review, revealed that public licensing reports and/or information regarding how to obtain them, were not made available to residents and visitors. LPA directly observed the concierge station and required postings during two (2) unannounced facility visits; LPA did not observe any Licensing reports or signs informing of how to view a report. Interview with front desk staff revealed admissions that staff did not knCDSS inspection report, March 29, 2024 · control 08-AS-20230710094552

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not administer resident's medication, as prescribed. Facility charged resident for services not rendered.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Erika Castile, Resident Care Director Mikhail Grant, and Assisted Living Coordinator Misha Alvarez. On 4/5/23 it was alleged that facility staff did not administer a resident's medication as prescribed, and the facility charged a resident for services that were not being provided. The Department’s investigation consisted of two unannounced facility tours, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff, residents and outside sources, and LPA direct observations. Regarding the first allegation, "Staff did not administer resident's medication, as prescribed", it was alleged that facility staff did not ensure a resident had access to prescribed medication on a day the resident left the facility premises. (Continued on LIC9099-C) UnsubstCDSS inspection report, May 25, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230405161102
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not safeguard resident belongings.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Erika Castile, Resident Care Director Mikhail Grant, and Assisted Living Coordinator Misha Alvarez. On 5/10/23 it was alleged that a staff member stole from a resident (R1). The Department’s investigation consisted of two unannounced facility tours, review of facility records, interviews with facility staff, residents and outside sources, and LPA direct observations. Staff and outside source interviews revealed that there is a history of R1 reporting their property being stolen by staff members, and all internal facility investigations have found the accusations to be baseless and/or without proof that the incidents occurred. Outside source interview revealed that there were no concerns regarding the mishandling and/or security of resident property at the facilityCDSS inspection report, May 25, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230510143209
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not following infection control plan
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Iby Strong conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Resident Care Director Mikhail Grant. On January 11th, 2023, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging facility is not following infection control plan. During investigation, the LPA Strong collected pertinent facility documentation, conducted multiple interviews, and conducted a facility inspection. According to allegation, on December 26th, 2022, Resident 1 (R1) tested positive for Covid-19 and Resident 2 (R2), who shares a two-bedroom apartment with R1, was not separated to prevent R2 from exposure to infection. During facility inspection on January 17th, 2023, LPA Strong observed all facility staff wearing proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and viewed PPE stations properly placed outside of rooms being monitored for possible infections. Continue on LIC9099-C UnfoCDSS inspection report, January 27, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230111082512

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 20 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
10
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
20
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(760) 930-0060
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Sunrise At La Costa? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.