Vi At La Jolla Village is a continuing-care retirement community in San Diego, San Diego County, California — state license #374600675, licensed for 783 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 29 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated February 20, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

3 homes in view

Vi At La Jolla Village

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Continuing-care retirement community · Large community, 783 residents · San Diego, CA · San Diego County
LicensedMemory careHospiceWheelchair not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374600675, held since 1998 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
8515 Costa Verde Blvd · San Diego, San Diego County
Phone
(858) 646-7700
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file — ask the home
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGES 60 AND OVER. FIRE CLEARANCE APPROVED FOR 783 NON-AMBULTORY RESIDENTS. DEMENTIA APPROVED FOR 23 RESIDENTS WITH DELAYED EGRESS. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 25 RESIDENTS. LP NAME: CLASSIC RESIDENCE MANAGEMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. CONVERSION EFFECTIVE 5/12/2026.State service designation938 - CONTINUE CARE CONTRACT (CCC)the CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 32 times and filed 29 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated February 20, 2026.

Most recent state visit
February 20, 2026
Occupancy at the October 24, 2025 visit
477 of 783 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 12 documents with transcribed findings, dated November 10, 2022 to October 24, 2025. 12 of the 12 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (8). 12 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 12 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 19 of 29 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Feb 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 12, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20258 state visits · 11 documents
Oct 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff violated residents personal rights

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)Tiffany Holmes contacted the facility to deliver findings for a complaint investigation via tele-virtual. LPA identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit and the basic elements of the complaint with Amy Patterson, Associate Executive Director. During the investigation, LPA toured the facility, conducted interviews and completed a records review. It was alleged that the facility staff violated residents personal rights. Interviews revealed that that if the residents do not chose a selected home care agency(ies) that the facility staff want them to choose, then they get threatened. Interviews revealed by the staff at the facility by doing this it does not allow the residents to choose an unbias option that includes variation in hourly costs or agencies. Interviews with residents stated they have not been threatened and that they have been given the choice to choose their own home care servicer. Interviews revealed the residents don't feelthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250611162024
Oct 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 31, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 31, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unlawful eviction

On June 4, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced visit to present investigative findings. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted by Associate Executive Director, Amy Patterson, to whom she introduced herself and explained the purpose of the visit. The Department investigated the complaint allegation listed above. The investigation comprised a facility tour, multiple interviews, and a thorough review of relevant records. Background of the Complaint On May 5, 2025, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging unlawful eviction. Specifically, it was alleged that on April 27, 2025, when the hospital attempted to discharge Resident (R1) back to the facility, the staff initially refused to accept R1 back into their independent living apartment. (Continue at LIC9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 4, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250505110228
Jun 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff violated resident's privacy.

On June 4, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced visit to present investigative findings. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted by Associate Executive Director Amy Patterson, to whom she introduced herself and explained the purpose of the visit. The Department conducted an investigation into the complaint allegation listed above, which included a facility tour, multiple interviews, and a thorough review of relevant records. Background of the Complaint On May 22, 2025, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that staff violated a resident's privacy. Specifically, it was alleged that on May 16, 2025, facility staff knocked on R1's door and, upon receiving no answer, entered without R1's knowledge or consent. Furthermore, on May 19, 2025, facility staff called 911, leading law enforcement to conduct a wellness check on R1. A Confidential Names List (LIC 811) was provided to identify the resident. (Continue at LIC9099C) Unsubstathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 4, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250522091750
Mar 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide a comfortable room temperature for resident resulting in injury

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA was greeted by Executive Director Stephanie Boudreau, to whom she identified herself and explained the purpose of the visit. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegation. The investigation included a facility tour, multiple interviews, and a detailed review of relevant records. On February 3, 2025, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that facility staff failed to maintain a comfortable temperature for Resident 1 (R1), resulting in injury. [A Confidential Names List (LIC 811) was provided to staff to identify the resident.] (Continue at LIC9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 28, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250203115111
Feb 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff threatened a resident with eviction

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA was greeted by Executive Director Stephanie Boudreau, to whom she identified herself and explained the purpose of the visit. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegation. The investigation included a facility tour, multiple interviews, and a detailed review of relevant records. On February 11, 2025, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that facility staff threatened Resident 1 (R1) with eviction, [A Confidential Names List (LIC 811) was provided to staff to identify the resident.] (Continue at LIC9099C) ****This is an amended LIC9099**** Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 28, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250211003115
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not meet the needs of residents in care Staff did not accord dignity to residents in care Staff did not maintain the facility in good sanitary condition

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced complaint visit to open a complaint investigation. While at the facility LPA investigated and delivered findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Executive Director, Stephanie Boudreau. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed and delivered the findings of the complaint with Boudreau. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff and a detailed review of relevant records pertinent to this investigation. On December 11, 2024, it was alleged that the staff did not meet the needs of residents in care, staff did not accord dignity to residents in care and staff did not maintain the facility in good sanitary condition. Based on the Department’s investigation of the above-mentioned allegations and the evidence obtained from staff interviews and records review, we have found that the complaint was unfounded. (continue at LIC9099the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 13, 2024 · control 08-AS-20241211085525
Aug 27, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature for resident Staff did not meet resident's dietary needs Staff charged resident for services not rendered

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA was greeted by Executive Director, Stephanie Boudreau to whom she identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegations. The investigation consisted of a tour of the facility, multiple interviews, and a detailed review of relevant records, including medical records and other relevant evidence pertinent to this investigation. On April 16, 2024, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that facility staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature for resident (R1), [a LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to staff to identify the resident]. It was specifically alleged that the temperature in R1’s apartment was freezing (62-65 °F) because there was airflow coming through the front door from the hallway and that the facility’s heating, ventilation, and air conditioninthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 27, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240416094242
May 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20233 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 30, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not follow the terms of the admission agreement

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA was greeted by Executive Director, Stephanie Boudreau to whom she identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegation. The investigation consisted of a tour of the facility, multiple interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources, and records review. On November 16, 2023, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that the facility did not follow the terms of the admission agreement. It was specifically alleged that after being discharged from the hospital, resident (R1) [a LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to staff to identify the resident] was not allowed back into their apartment located in the independent living venue of the community. Continue at LIC9099C Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 30, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231116081523
Oct 12, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff overmedicated resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Amy Patterson, Associate Executive Director. On 7/8/2020 it was alleged that facility staff overmedicated a resident (R1). The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff and outside sources. Staff interview revealed that the medication in question was prescribed to be given as needed when R1 presented outside of their baseline behaviors. Staff interview revealed that staff were in communication with R1's physician, Hospice agency, and DPOA regarding the administration of the medication. Records review revealed daily documentation by staff regarding R1's behaviors and when the medication was given. Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 12, 2023 · control 08-AS-20200708085350
Aug 18, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints0typical 2
Total complaints14typical 7
State visits on file32typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 1998.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026220202581102024330202355020226602021220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?
How are care plans reviewed when a resident’s needs change?

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (858) 646-7700

Is Vi At La Jolla Village licensed?

Yes — Vi At La Jolla Village is a licensed continuing-care retirement community in San Diego (San Diego County): California license #374600675, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 783 residents. State records list 29 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated February 20, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Vi At La Jolla Village care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Vi At La Jolla Village with clearances for dementia / memory care and hospice care; it does not list wheelchair / non-ambulatory and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGES 60 AND OVER. FIRE CLEARANCE APPROVED FOR 783 NON-AMBULTORY RESIDENTS. DEMENTIA APPROVED FOR 23 RESIDENTS WITH DELAYED EGRESS. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 25 RESIDENTS. LP NAME: CLASSIC RESIDENCE MANAGEMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. CONVERSION EFFECTIVE 5/12/2026.

How much does Vi At La Jolla Village cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Vi At La Jolla Village's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Vi At La Jolla Village accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Vi At La Jolla Village is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

477 of 783 beds occupied (61%) when the state visited on October 24, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Vi At La Jolla Village?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 32 state visits and 29 dated documents since 2021 for Vi At La Jolla Village; 12 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 24, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

12 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff violated residents personal rights
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)Tiffany Holmes contacted the facility to deliver findings for a complaint investigation via tele-virtual. LPA identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit and the basic elements of the complaint with Amy Patterson, Associate Executive Director. During the investigation, LPA toured the facility, conducted interviews and completed a records review. It was alleged that the facility staff violated residents personal rights. Interviews revealed that that if the residents do not chose a selected home care agency(ies) that the facility staff want them to choose, then they get threatened. Interviews revealed by the staff at the facility by doing this it does not allow the residents to choose an unbias option that includes variation in hourly costs or agencies. Interviews with residents stated they have not been threatened and that they have been given the choice to choose their own home care servicer. Interviews revealed the residents don't feelCDSS inspection report, October 24, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250611162024
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnlawful eviction
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On June 4, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced visit to present investigative findings. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted by Associate Executive Director, Amy Patterson, to whom she introduced herself and explained the purpose of the visit. The Department investigated the complaint allegation listed above. The investigation comprised a facility tour, multiple interviews, and a thorough review of relevant records. Background of the Complaint On May 5, 2025, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging unlawful eviction. Specifically, it was alleged that on April 27, 2025, when the hospital attempted to discharge Resident (R1) back to the facility, the staff initially refused to accept R1 back into their independent living apartment. (Continue at LIC9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 4, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250505110228
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff violated resident's privacy.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On June 4, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced visit to present investigative findings. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted by Associate Executive Director Amy Patterson, to whom she introduced herself and explained the purpose of the visit. The Department conducted an investigation into the complaint allegation listed above, which included a facility tour, multiple interviews, and a thorough review of relevant records. Background of the Complaint On May 22, 2025, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that staff violated a resident's privacy. Specifically, it was alleged that on May 16, 2025, facility staff knocked on R1's door and, upon receiving no answer, entered without R1's knowledge or consent. Furthermore, on May 19, 2025, facility staff called 911, leading law enforcement to conduct a wellness check on R1. A Confidential Names List (LIC 811) was provided to identify the resident. (Continue at LIC9099C) UnsubstaCDSS inspection report, June 4, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250522091750
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide a comfortable room temperature for resident resulting in injury
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA was greeted by Executive Director Stephanie Boudreau, to whom she identified herself and explained the purpose of the visit. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegation. The investigation included a facility tour, multiple interviews, and a detailed review of relevant records. On February 3, 2025, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that facility staff failed to maintain a comfortable temperature for Resident 1 (R1), resulting in injury. [A Confidential Names List (LIC 811) was provided to staff to identify the resident.] (Continue at LIC9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 28, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250203115111
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff threatened a resident with eviction
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA was greeted by Executive Director Stephanie Boudreau, to whom she identified herself and explained the purpose of the visit. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegation. The investigation included a facility tour, multiple interviews, and a detailed review of relevant records. On February 11, 2025, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that facility staff threatened Resident 1 (R1) with eviction, [A Confidential Names List (LIC 811) was provided to staff to identify the resident.] (Continue at LIC9099C) ****This is an amended LIC9099**** UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 28, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250211003115

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not meet the needs of residents in care Staff did not accord dignity to residents in care Staff did not maintain the facility in good sanitary condition
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced complaint visit to open a complaint investigation. While at the facility LPA investigated and delivered findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Executive Director, Stephanie Boudreau. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed and delivered the findings of the complaint with Boudreau. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff and a detailed review of relevant records pertinent to this investigation. On December 11, 2024, it was alleged that the staff did not meet the needs of residents in care, staff did not accord dignity to residents in care and staff did not maintain the facility in good sanitary condition. Based on the Department’s investigation of the above-mentioned allegations and the evidence obtained from staff interviews and records review, we have found that the complaint was unfounded. (continue at LIC9099CDSS inspection report, December 13, 2024 · control 08-AS-20241211085525
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not maintain a comfortable temperature for resident Staff did not meet resident's dietary needs Staff charged resident for services not rendered
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA was greeted by Executive Director, Stephanie Boudreau to whom she identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegations. The investigation consisted of a tour of the facility, multiple interviews, and a detailed review of relevant records, including medical records and other relevant evidence pertinent to this investigation. On April 16, 2024, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that facility staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature for resident (R1), [a LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to staff to identify the resident]. It was specifically alleged that the temperature in R1’s apartment was freezing (62-65 °F) because there was airflow coming through the front door from the hallway and that the facility’s heating, ventilation, and air conditioninCDSS inspection report, August 27, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240416094242

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not follow the terms of the admission agreement
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA was greeted by Executive Director, Stephanie Boudreau to whom she identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegation. The investigation consisted of a tour of the facility, multiple interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources, and records review. On November 16, 2023, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that the facility did not follow the terms of the admission agreement. It was specifically alleged that after being discharged from the hospital, resident (R1) [a LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to staff to identify the resident] was not allowed back into their apartment located in the independent living venue of the community. Continue at LIC9099C UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, November 30, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231116081523
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff overmedicated resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Amy Patterson, Associate Executive Director. On 7/8/2020 it was alleged that facility staff overmedicated a resident (R1). The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff and outside sources. Staff interview revealed that the medication in question was prescribed to be given as needed when R1 presented outside of their baseline behaviors. Staff interview revealed that staff were in communication with R1's physician, Hospice agency, and DPOA regarding the administration of the medication. Records review revealed daily documentation by staff regarding R1's behaviors and when the medication was given. Continued on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 12, 2023 · control 08-AS-20200708085350
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not keep indoor passageways free from obstruction
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA was greeted by Administrator, Stephanie Boudreau to whom she identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit. The Department investigated the above listed complaint allegation. The investigation consisted of an inspection of the facility, multiple interviews with staff and outside sources, and records review, including Fire Clearance Inspection Report. On 11/22/2022, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging the facility did not keep indoor passageways free from obstruction. Specifically, it was alleged that the South Tower hallways of the facility was too narrow posing a safety risk for residents in care. Per the Inspection Division with the City of San Diego the passageways were built to the approved plans and comply with the Building Codes. In addition, Fire Clearance Inspection conducted on January 10, 2023, indicated no violatioCDSS inspection report, January 23, 2023 · control 08-AS-20221122105807

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 32 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
14
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
32
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(858) 646-7700
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Vi At La Jolla Village? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.