Brookdale Loma Linda is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Loma Linda, San Bernardino County, California — state license #361881034, licensed for 220 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 21 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated February 4, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

30 homes in view

Brookdale Loma Linda

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 220 residents · Loma Linda, CA · San Bernardino County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #361881034, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
25585 Van Leuven Street · Loma Linda, San Bernardino County
Phone
(909) 796-5421
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 220 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 6 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 220 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 6 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. 102, 111, 154, 170, 180 AND 186 ARE THE ROOMS APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN ON THE 1ST FLOOR. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 25 times and filed 21 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated February 4, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 1, 2026
Occupancy at the April 28, 2025 visit
111 of 220 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 14 documents with transcribed findings, dated April 28, 2022 to April 28, 2025. 14 of the 14 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (10). 14 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 14 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 11 of 21 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Feb 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Apr 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained bruise from staff while in care Staff is not responding to resident call pendants in a timely manner Staff is not treating resident with dignity and respect Staff did not change resident's diaper in a timely manner

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Maritza Lujan and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding Allegation #1, it was alleged Resident 1 (R1) sustained a bruise from staff while in care. R1 moved out of the facility in November 2024 and was unavailable to be interviewed. LPA interviewed 11 residents, which all informed LPA they have not sustained bruising from staff. LPA interviewed 5 staff, which all have informed LPA they have not left brusies on residents, nor have they seen or heard of other staff leave bruises on residents. Regarding Allegation #2, LPA interviewed 11 residents, 4 out of 11 residents informed LPA staff respond to call pendant in a timely manner. 1 out of 11 residents informed LPA staff do not respond to call pendant in a timely manner. 4 out of 11 residents informed LPA they are independent athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 28, 2025 · control 56-AS-20220920133432
Feb 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 5 documents
Nov 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff inappropriately touched a resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on a complaint investigation on the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Maritza Lujan, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of file review and interviews with relevant parties, regarding the allegation facility staff inappropriately touched a resident in care, LPA conducted 4 staff interviews, 4 out of the 4 staff informed LPA they have not touched residents inappropriately nor have they heard of other staff touching residents inappropriately. LPA conducted 5 resident interviews, 4 out of the 5 residents informed LPA they have not been touched inappropriately by staff. 1 out of the 5 residents no longer resides at the facility however, during their time at the facility they were not touched inappropriately by staff. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 26, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240814131711
Nov 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff handled resident in a rough manner Staff not treating resident with respect Staff left resident unattended for multiple hours

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation on the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Maritza Lujan, and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding allegation #1, LPA conducted 3 staff interviews, 3 out of the 3 staff informed LPA S#1 had handled R#1 in a rough manner. Executive Director followed the proper reporting requirements notified CCLD and the local Police Department, S#1 has been placed on suspension since 11/16/24 pending an internal investigation. LPA conducted 5 resident interviews, 1 out of the 5 residents informed LPA S#1 handled resident in a rough manner, 4 out of 5 residents informed LPA staff does not handle them in a rough manner. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 26, 2024 · control 56-AS-20241121111551
May 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff threatened resident with eviction Resident was not accorded dignity in relationships with other residents.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conclude the investigation on the above allegations. Regarding the allegation, facility staff threatened resident with eviction, there is not enough evidence to corroborate that resident #1 (R1) was threatened with an eviction. Regarding the allegation, resident was not accorded dignity in relationships with other residents, there is not enough evidence to corroborate this allegation. Based LPA observations, review of pertinent documents, staff interviews, and resident interviews, the allegations are Unsubstantiated. An Unsubstantiated finding means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy of this report with Appeal Rights was provided to Executive Director Lujan at the conclusion of the visit. Unsubstantiathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240126110636
Feb 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not dispense resident's medication as prescribed

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Yolanda Delgado made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings for a complaint investigation into the allegation listed above. During the investigation, LPA interviewed four (4) staff members and eight (8) residents. LPA reviewed pertinent documents pertaining to the allegation. LPA was unable to interview pertinent residents due to refusal. On July 30, 2021, Community Care Licensing received a complaint indicating that facility staff did not dispense resident’s medication as prescribed. It was reported facility staff stopped giving Resident #1 (R1) medication for an unspecified amount of days until the facility received R1’s new prescription. It was also reported that R1 had a current prescription that they were not distributing to R1. Additional witness visited the facility on May 21, 2022 Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 15, 2024 · control 18-AS-20210730133208
Feb 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not ensure that resident's medication was refilled in a timely manner Facility staff failed to report changes to resident's POA Facility charging resident for additional services

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Yolanda Delgado made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings for a complaint investigation into the allegations listed above. During the investigation, LPA interviewed four (4) staff members and eight (8) residents. LPA reviewed pertinent documents pertaining to the allegations. LPA was unable to interview pertinent residents due to refusal. On July 30, 2021, Community Care Licensing received a complaint indicating facility staff did not ensure that resident’s medication was refilled in a timely manner, facility staff failed to report changes to resident’s Power of Attorney, and facility was charging resident for additional services. (continued on page 2) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 15, 2024 · control 18-AS-20210730133208
20233 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 19, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 16, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: The facility carpet is not clean. Staff yelled at resident. Staff disclosed a resident's medical diagnosis to the residents in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rayshaun Nickolas visited the facility unannounced to initiate an investigation and deliver the finding on the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Maritza Lujan and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation included file reviews, facility tour, and interviews with relevant parties. Allegation #1 "The facility carpet is not clean". The allegation alleged that stains/spots were observed on the carpet in a resident’s room. The allegation alleged that a request was made to have the carpet cleaned but it did not happen. LPA Nickolas' interview with the executive director revealed that they denied this allegation. LPA Nickolas' interview with staff #1 (S1) revealed that they denied this allegation. LPA Nickolas’ interview with R1 revealed that they confirmed this allegation. LPA Nickolas' interview with staff # 2 (S2) and staff #3 (S3) also denied this allegation. LPA Nickolas' file review revealed that two (2) requests for carpet clthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 28, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230922140927
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations3typical 1
Substantiated complaints6typical 2
Total complaints13typical 7
State visits on file25typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025220202435220237702022770
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — San Bernardino County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2024 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (909) 796-5421

Is Brookdale Loma Linda licensed?

Yes — Brookdale Loma Linda is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Loma Linda (San Bernardino County): California license #361881034, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 220 residents. State records list 21 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated February 4, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Brookdale Loma Linda care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Brookdale Loma Linda with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 220 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 6 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. 102, 111, 154, 170, 180 AND 186 ARE THE ROOMS APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN ON THE 1ST FLOOR. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.

How much does Brookdale Loma Linda cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Brookdale Loma Linda's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Bernardino County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Brookdale Loma Linda accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Brookdale Loma Linda is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

111 of 220 beds occupied (50%) when the state visited on April 28, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Brookdale Loma Linda?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 25 state visits and 21 dated documents since 2022 for Brookdale Loma Linda; 14 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 28, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

14 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained bruise from staff while in care Staff is not responding to resident call pendants in a timely manner Staff is not treating resident with dignity and respect Staff did not change resident's diaper in a timely manner
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Maritza Lujan and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding Allegation #1, it was alleged Resident 1 (R1) sustained a bruise from staff while in care. R1 moved out of the facility in November 2024 and was unavailable to be interviewed. LPA interviewed 11 residents, which all informed LPA they have not sustained bruising from staff. LPA interviewed 5 staff, which all have informed LPA they have not left brusies on residents, nor have they seen or heard of other staff leave bruises on residents. Regarding Allegation #2, LPA interviewed 11 residents, 4 out of 11 residents informed LPA staff respond to call pendant in a timely manner. 1 out of 11 residents informed LPA staff do not respond to call pendant in a timely manner. 4 out of 11 residents informed LPA they are independent aCDSS inspection report, April 28, 2025 · control 56-AS-20220920133432

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff inappropriately touched a resident in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on a complaint investigation on the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Maritza Lujan, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of file review and interviews with relevant parties, regarding the allegation facility staff inappropriately touched a resident in care, LPA conducted 4 staff interviews, 4 out of the 4 staff informed LPA they have not touched residents inappropriately nor have they heard of other staff touching residents inappropriately. LPA conducted 5 resident interviews, 4 out of the 5 residents informed LPA they have not been touched inappropriately by staff. 1 out of the 5 residents no longer resides at the facility however, during their time at the facility they were not touched inappropriately by staff. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 26, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240814131711
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff handled resident in a rough manner Staff not treating resident with respect Staff left resident unattended for multiple hours
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation on the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Maritza Lujan, and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding allegation #1, LPA conducted 3 staff interviews, 3 out of the 3 staff informed LPA S#1 had handled R#1 in a rough manner. Executive Director followed the proper reporting requirements notified CCLD and the local Police Department, S#1 has been placed on suspension since 11/16/24 pending an internal investigation. LPA conducted 5 resident interviews, 1 out of the 5 residents informed LPA S#1 handled resident in a rough manner, 4 out of 5 residents informed LPA staff does not handle them in a rough manner. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 26, 2024 · control 56-AS-20241121111551
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff threatened resident with eviction Resident was not accorded dignity in relationships with other residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conclude the investigation on the above allegations. Regarding the allegation, facility staff threatened resident with eviction, there is not enough evidence to corroborate that resident #1 (R1) was threatened with an eviction. Regarding the allegation, resident was not accorded dignity in relationships with other residents, there is not enough evidence to corroborate this allegation. Based LPA observations, review of pertinent documents, staff interviews, and resident interviews, the allegations are Unsubstantiated. An Unsubstantiated finding means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy of this report with Appeal Rights was provided to Executive Director Lujan at the conclusion of the visit. UnsubstantiaCDSS inspection report, May 21, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240126110636
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not dispense resident's medication as prescribed
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Yolanda Delgado made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings for a complaint investigation into the allegation listed above. During the investigation, LPA interviewed four (4) staff members and eight (8) residents. LPA reviewed pertinent documents pertaining to the allegation. LPA was unable to interview pertinent residents due to refusal. On July 30, 2021, Community Care Licensing received a complaint indicating that facility staff did not dispense resident’s medication as prescribed. It was reported facility staff stopped giving Resident #1 (R1) medication for an unspecified amount of days until the facility received R1’s new prescription. It was also reported that R1 had a current prescription that they were not distributing to R1. Additional witness visited the facility on May 21, 2022 SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 15, 2024 · control 18-AS-20210730133208
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not ensure that resident's medication was refilled in a timely manner Facility staff failed to report changes to resident's POA Facility charging resident for additional services
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Yolanda Delgado made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings for a complaint investigation into the allegations listed above. During the investigation, LPA interviewed four (4) staff members and eight (8) residents. LPA reviewed pertinent documents pertaining to the allegations. LPA was unable to interview pertinent residents due to refusal. On July 30, 2021, Community Care Licensing received a complaint indicating facility staff did not ensure that resident’s medication was refilled in a timely manner, facility staff failed to report changes to resident’s Power of Attorney, and facility was charging resident for additional services. (continued on page 2) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 15, 2024 · control 18-AS-20210730133208

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedThe facility carpet is not clean. Staff yelled at resident. Staff disclosed a resident's medical diagnosis to the residents in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rayshaun Nickolas visited the facility unannounced to initiate an investigation and deliver the finding on the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Maritza Lujan and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation included file reviews, facility tour, and interviews with relevant parties. Allegation #1 "The facility carpet is not clean". The allegation alleged that stains/spots were observed on the carpet in a resident’s room. The allegation alleged that a request was made to have the carpet cleaned but it did not happen. LPA Nickolas' interview with the executive director revealed that they denied this allegation. LPA Nickolas' interview with staff #1 (S1) revealed that they denied this allegation. LPA Nickolas’ interview with R1 revealed that they confirmed this allegation. LPA Nickolas' interview with staff # 2 (S2) and staff #3 (S3) also denied this allegation. LPA Nickolas' file review revealed that two (2) requests for carpet clCDSS inspection report, September 28, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230922140927
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not keep facility kitchen clean and sanitary Facility kitchen has mold
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 4/28/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced complaint visit at the facility. LPA met with Ashley Fife, Business Office Manager and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff do not keep facility kitchen clean and sanitary, LPA toured the kitchen, which was accessible and free of litter. All staff in the kitchen were wearing hair coverings. Kitchen equipment, dishes and utensils were clean. Procedures necessary for proper cleaning, sanitizing dishes and hand washing were posted in the kitchen area. All residents interviewed stated that they have not observed staff not keeping the kitchen clean nor have they seen dirty trays when being served meals. All staff interviewed deny kitchen not clean and sanitary. Regarding the allegation, facility kitchen has mold, LPA toured the kitchen and did not observe mold. All residents interviewed have not observed mold in kitchen. All staff interviewed have not observed mold in the kitcheCDSS inspection report, April 28, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230413134644
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee does not adequately staff facility to meet resident needs Staff yell at residents Staff do not maintain the facility in clean and sanitary condition Staff do not bathe/shower residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 4/10/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Malcore met with Office Manager, Ashley Fife and discussed the purpose of the visit. Administrator, Maritza Lujan arrived at the facility shortly after and LPA discussed the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, LPA toured the facility, obtained relevant documents, interviewed staff, and residents. Regarding the allegation, Licensee does not adequately staff facility to meet resident needs, All staff interviewed deny that the Licensee does not adequately staff facility to meet resident needs. All residents interviewed deny that the Licensee does not adequately staff facility to meet resident needs. Staff interviews and documentation reveal that the facility documents which residents need bathroom and incontinence care to ensure that the residents personal needs are met. LPA did not encounter a resident wiCDSS inspection report, April 10, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230406114326
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility freezer is in disrepair. Staff not washing hands.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bernadette Allen an conducted an unannounced visit to initiate and deliver findings for the allegations above. LPA met with Maritza Lujuan and disclosed the nature of the alleged allegations. #1 Allegation- Facility Freezer is in disrepair- LPA investigation consisted of interviews with eight (8) staff members who stated that the refrigerators and freezers have been in working condition and has not been out of order. Maritza Lujuan also provided documents pertaining to maintenance service/repair which was last conducted back in August 2022. LPA toured the kitchen, walk-in freezer (Temp -4 ), and walk-in refrigerator(Temp 32 degrees) and they are in working condition. #2 Allegation- LPA investigation consisted of interviews with eight (8) staff members who stated staff members are required to wash their hands while working in the kitchen/dining area and that they have not noticed other staff members not washing their hands. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 28, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230223163022

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 25 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
6
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
13
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
25
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(909) 796-5421
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Brookdale Loma Linda? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.