Commons At Elk Grove, The is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Elk Grove, Sacramento County, California — state license #342700369, licensed for 110 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 22 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 26, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

23 homes in view

Commons At Elk Grove, The

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 110 residents · Elk Grove, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairBedriddenMemory care not on fileHospice not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #342700369, held since 2018 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
9564 Sabrina Lane · Elk Grove, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 683-6833
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 110 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careApproved for 10 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
LICENSED TO SERVE AGES 60 AND OVER. FIRE CLEARANCE FOR 110 NON AMBULATORY OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOPSICE WAIVER FOR (15) FIFTEEN RESIDENTS.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 26 times and filed 22 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 26, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 26, 2026
Occupancy at the October 9, 2025 visit
73 of 110 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 9 documents with transcribed findings, dated November 5, 2021 to October 9, 2025. 9 of the 9 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (8). 9 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 9 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 15 of 22 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jun 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20255 state visits · 5 documents
Oct 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure medications are dispensed as prescribed

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Vincent Moleski and Triel Lindstrom arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with executive director Edward Ocegueda and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Moleski reviewed a resident's (R1's) medication administration records. LPA Moleski observed an order for a narcotic painkiller dated April 2025. The order stated that R1 was to receive one half tablet per day as needed for pain. R1 was not to receive more than one half tablet within 24 hours. LPA Moleski reviewed a change order, dated May 9, 2025. R1's prescription was updated such that R1 was ordered to receive two half tablets of the medication per day. However, prior to the change order, on April 27, 2025, R1 received two half tablets of the medication, according to R1's paper narcotic MARs. LPA Moleski asked the facility's health services director (S1) if there were additional prescription orders which would explain this incident. The healththe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250603121451
Oct 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility illegally evicted a resident in care. Staff overcharged a resident in care. Staff did not ensure resident was provided meals.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to follow up on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Meggin Cortez and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed Cortez, five staff members (S1-S5), and a former resident's responsible party (R1's RP). LPA Moleski reviewed R1's file. R1 moved into the assisted living section of this facility as of 3/19/2024, according to their admission agreement. R1's initial LIC 602, dated 1/31/24, indicated that R1 had a diagnosis of dementia, but indicated that R1 did not suffer from confusion or disorientation, and that R1 did not exhibit wandering or sundowning behaviors. R1's physician classified R1 as ambulatory. [continued on 9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 7, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241230205302
Jan 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20246 state visits · 6 documents
Nov 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 28, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff pressured resident to accept emergency transport to the hospital.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Meggin Cortez and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed Cortez, two staff members (S2-S3), a resident (R1), and two family members of R1 (F1, F2). LPA Moleski reviewed an incident report which described a fall suffered by R1 on 9/6/2024. The report indicated that one of R1’s family members, F2, was present when R1 fell. F2 told S2 that R1 had fallen, and, after examining R1, S2 called 911, according to the incident report. The incident report further stated that responding paramedics said R1 did not need to go to the hospital. R1 was able to resume normal activities that same day, but R1’s family was "encouraged" to schedule a follow up appointment, according to the report. [continued on 9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 28, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240909181354
Jul 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is not delivering hot water for residents in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to open this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Meggin Cortez and explained the purose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, record review, and observation. In an interview, Cortez said that two of the facility's water heaters, which provided hot water to residents' rooms, went down on Sunday, July 14, 2024. A third water heater, which provided hot water for kitchen and laundry services, was still operational, according to Cortez. The water heaters were repaired and working again by Monday, July 15, 2024, but went down again, according to Cortez. Intermittent water heater issues continued until the morning of Thursday, July 18, 2024, according to Cortez. During the time the water heaters were not working, residents had access to hot water for showers or bed baths from the kitchen, according to Cortez. [continued on 9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 23, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240717170455
Jun 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20232 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 2, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure medications are properly managed for residents in care Staff do not ensure medication records are maintained for residents in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Meggin Cortez and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, record review and observation. LPA Moleski reviewed medication administration records (MARs) for July, August, and September for 10 residents (R1-R10). LPA Moleski did not observe on any of these MARs for any of these residents any instances where medications ran out and were not given as a result. LPA Moleski observed no irregularities on these MARs that were not explained in marginal notes on these MARs. [continued on 9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 2, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230920101802
Nov 2, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained unexplained bruising while in care Facility staff are not preventing resident from physically assualting another resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Meggin Cortez and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, record review and observation. LPA Moleski reviewed three months’ worth of incident reports received via fax from this facility. LPA Moleski did not observe any incident reports describing physical altercations between residents as alleged in this complaint. LPA Moleski interviewed eight residents (R2, R11-R17) and 11 staff members (S1-S11). None of the residents or staff members interviewed were aware of any physical altercations that had occurred between residents as alleged in this complaint. [continued on 9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 2, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230927093125
Sep 18, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints2typical 2
Total complaints10typical 7
State visits on file26typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2018.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020255512024660202345020222302021220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
If end-of-life care were ever needed, could they stay here? What’s the plan?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 683-6833

Is Commons At Elk Grove, The licensed?

Yes — Commons At Elk Grove, The is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Elk Grove (Sacramento County): California license #342700369, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 110 residents. State records list 22 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 26, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Commons At Elk Grove, The care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Commons At Elk Grove, The with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care and hospice care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordLICENSED TO SERVE AGES 60 AND OVER. FIRE CLEARANCE FOR 110 NON AMBULATORY OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOPSICE WAIVER FOR (15) FIFTEEN RESIDENTS.

How much does Commons At Elk Grove, The cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Commons At Elk Grove, The's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Commons At Elk Grove, The accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Commons At Elk Grove, The is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

73 of 110 beds occupied (66%) when the state visited on October 9, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Commons At Elk Grove, The?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 26 state visits and 22 dated documents since 2021 for Commons At Elk Grove, The; 9 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 9, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

9 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure medications are dispensed as prescribed
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Vincent Moleski and Triel Lindstrom arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with executive director Edward Ocegueda and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Moleski reviewed a resident's (R1's) medication administration records. LPA Moleski observed an order for a narcotic painkiller dated April 2025. The order stated that R1 was to receive one half tablet per day as needed for pain. R1 was not to receive more than one half tablet within 24 hours. LPA Moleski reviewed a change order, dated May 9, 2025. R1's prescription was updated such that R1 was ordered to receive two half tablets of the medication per day. However, prior to the change order, on April 27, 2025, R1 received two half tablets of the medication, according to R1's paper narcotic MARs. LPA Moleski asked the facility's health services director (S1) if there were additional prescription orders which would explain this incident. The healthCDSS inspection report, October 9, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250603121451
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility illegally evicted a resident in care. Staff overcharged a resident in care. Staff did not ensure resident was provided meals.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to follow up on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Meggin Cortez and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed Cortez, five staff members (S1-S5), and a former resident's responsible party (R1's RP). LPA Moleski reviewed R1's file. R1 moved into the assisted living section of this facility as of 3/19/2024, according to their admission agreement. R1's initial LIC 602, dated 1/31/24, indicated that R1 had a diagnosis of dementia, but indicated that R1 did not suffer from confusion or disorientation, and that R1 did not exhibit wandering or sundowning behaviors. R1's physician classified R1 as ambulatory. [continued on 9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 7, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241230205302

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff pressured resident to accept emergency transport to the hospital.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Meggin Cortez and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed Cortez, two staff members (S2-S3), a resident (R1), and two family members of R1 (F1, F2). LPA Moleski reviewed an incident report which described a fall suffered by R1 on 9/6/2024. The report indicated that one of R1’s family members, F2, was present when R1 fell. F2 told S2 that R1 had fallen, and, after examining R1, S2 called 911, according to the incident report. The incident report further stated that responding paramedics said R1 did not need to go to the hospital. R1 was able to resume normal activities that same day, but R1’s family was "encouraged" to schedule a follow up appointment, according to the report. [continued on 9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 28, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240909181354
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not delivering hot water for residents in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to open this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Meggin Cortez and explained the purose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, record review, and observation. In an interview, Cortez said that two of the facility's water heaters, which provided hot water to residents' rooms, went down on Sunday, July 14, 2024. A third water heater, which provided hot water for kitchen and laundry services, was still operational, according to Cortez. The water heaters were repaired and working again by Monday, July 15, 2024, but went down again, according to Cortez. Intermittent water heater issues continued until the morning of Thursday, July 18, 2024, according to Cortez. During the time the water heaters were not working, residents had access to hot water for showers or bed baths from the kitchen, according to Cortez. [continued on 9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 23, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240717170455

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure medications are properly managed for residents in care Staff do not ensure medication records are maintained for residents in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Meggin Cortez and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, record review and observation. LPA Moleski reviewed medication administration records (MARs) for July, August, and September for 10 residents (R1-R10). LPA Moleski did not observe on any of these MARs for any of these residents any instances where medications ran out and were not given as a result. LPA Moleski observed no irregularities on these MARs that were not explained in marginal notes on these MARs. [continued on 9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 2, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230920101802
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained unexplained bruising while in care Facility staff are not preventing resident from physically assualting another resident in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Meggin Cortez and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, record review and observation. LPA Moleski reviewed three months’ worth of incident reports received via fax from this facility. LPA Moleski did not observe any incident reports describing physical altercations between residents as alleged in this complaint. LPA Moleski interviewed eight residents (R2, R11-R17) and 11 staff members (S1-S11). None of the residents or staff members interviewed were aware of any physical altercations that had occurred between residents as alleged in this complaint. [continued on 9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 2, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230927093125

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 26 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
10
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
26
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 683-6833
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Commons At Elk Grove, The? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.