Temple Court Senior Care is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Murrieta, Riverside County, California — state license #336413282, with a licensed capacity of 6, listed as closed, change of ownership in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 15 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated September 30, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

300 homes in view

Temple Court Senior Care

The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Murrieta, CA · Riverside County
Closed in state recordWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days · we confirm by phone before any referral
License #336413282, held since 2007 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
40009 Temple Ct. · Murrieta, Riverside County
Phone
(951) 461-4750
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careVerified in record

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
TOTAL CAPACITY IS SIX(6) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS, AGES 60 AND ABOVE. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR THREE (3) RESIDENTS. ONE (1) BEDRIDDEN FIRECLEARANCE FOR BEDROOM #1.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 17 times and filed 15 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on September 30, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
September 30, 2025
Occupancy at the July 10, 2024 visit
5 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 6 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 2, 2021 to September 30, 2025. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 6 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 9 of 15 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20251 state visit · 1 document
Sep 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident's diapering needs not being met while in care. Unqualified staff are administering medications to residents in care. Residents with higher level of care needs are being retained at the facility. Resident was constrained to their bed while in care.

On 1/24/2022 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yolanda Delgado made an unannounced investigation visit to the facility to ascertain information regarding the above-mentioned allegation(s) and for the purpose of rendering the findings. LPA met with Administrator Esta Hobbs who assisted with the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: Allegation #1: Residents diapering needs not being met while in care It is alleged that residents in care diapers are not being changed timely. On1/24/2022 LPA Delgado interviewed 1 staff,requested and obtained copies of pertinent documents and toured the facility. There were no deficiencies and no civil penalties that were cited per Title 22 Division 6, of the California Code or Regulations at that time. On 10/1/2025 LPA Sparkle Day began the investigation follow up.LPA Day attempted to contact Reporting party and Facility to obtain further information. This facility closed on 5/23/25 .No residents are available for interview. No further informathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 30, 2025 · control 18-AS-20220121114610
20244 state visits · 5 documents
Jul 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are prepping resident pills a week in advance

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility in order to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Licensee, Esta Hobbs who was informed of the purpose of the visit. During the visit, Hobbs needed to attend to a private matter and LPA met with Staff, Mauhammad Alvi, LPA conducted interviews and conducted a walk through. It was alleged that staff prepare medication (1) week in advanced for the facility residents. LPA conducted a walk through and inspection of the resident medications and observed no prepoured medications. LPA conducted (2) staff interviews who confirmed medications are not prepoured for residents. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided. *LPA was offsite from 11:45pm to 12:45pm Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 10, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240702104759
Jun 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 3 documents
Nov 9, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained fracture while in care due to staff neglect Staff mismanaged resident's medication.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility in order to investigate and deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Licensee, Esta Hobbs, who was informed of the purpose of the visit. The department conducted interviews and records reviews. It was alleged that Resident#1 (R1) sustained a fracture on 09/11/2022 after sustaining three (3) falls at the facility due to staff neglect. Hospital discharge records dated 09/12/2022, showed R1 had a diagnosis of a comminuted displaced right femur fracture. Based on staff interviews, three (3) staff assisted R1 on 9/11/2022. Staff reported R1 was the only “wanderer” and that R1’s responsible party had informed the facility that R1 was a “fall risk”. A review of hospice notes dated 08/16/2022 revealed facility staff received training for fall prevention. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 9, 2023 · control 18-AS-20220926205159
Nov 9, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not releasing resident's records to resident's authorized respresntative.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola conducted an unannounced visit to the facility in order to deliver findings for the allegation above. LPA met with Licensee, Esta Hobbs, who was informed of the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted records review and interviews regarding the allegation that the facility was not providing Resident #1 (R1)'s records to their responsible party. LPA conducted records reviews of text messages sent on 11/11/2022 where R1's daily notes were being requested and staff stated in these texts that R1 did not have any such notes. Staff interview was conducted which corroborated the statements in the text messages. However, upon conducting record review of R1’s file LPA found a caregiver note dated 7/17/2022. Staff was asked about this note and it was revealed that this information was not provided due to requests of incident happening on September 2022 with R1. However, text exchange clearly stated that notes were being requested from July 2022 to Septethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 9, 2023 · control 18-AS-20230301155159
Nov 9, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations3typical 0
Type B citations2typical 0
Substantiated complaints4typical 0
Total complaints6typical 0
State visits on file17typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2007.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20251102024450202335220222202021220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,000$5,000 /mo
our estimate — Riverside County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one.
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →

Is Temple Court Senior Care licensed?

No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Temple Court Senior Care in Murrieta (Riverside County), California license #336413282, as “Closed, Change Of Ownership, formerly licensed for 6 residents. State records list 15 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated September 30, 2025, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Temple Court Senior Care care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Temple Court Senior Care with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordTOTAL CAPACITY IS SIX(6) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS, AGES 60 AND ABOVE. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR THREE (3) RESIDENTS. ONE (1) BEDRIDDEN FIRECLEARANCE FOR BEDROOM #1.

How much does Temple Court Senior Care cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Temple Court Senior Care's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Riverside County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Temple Court Senior Care accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Temple Court Senior Care is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

5 of 6 beds occupied (83%) when the state visited on July 10, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Temple Court Senior Care?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 17 state visits and 15 dated documents since 2021 for Temple Court Senior Care; 6 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated September 30, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

6 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident's diapering needs not being met while in care. Unqualified staff are administering medications to residents in care. Residents with higher level of care needs are being retained at the facility. Resident was constrained to their bed while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 1/24/2022 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yolanda Delgado made an unannounced investigation visit to the facility to ascertain information regarding the above-mentioned allegation(s) and for the purpose of rendering the findings. LPA met with Administrator Esta Hobbs who assisted with the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: Allegation #1: Residents diapering needs not being met while in care It is alleged that residents in care diapers are not being changed timely. On1/24/2022 LPA Delgado interviewed 1 staff,requested and obtained copies of pertinent documents and toured the facility. There were no deficiencies and no civil penalties that were cited per Title 22 Division 6, of the California Code or Regulations at that time. On 10/1/2025 LPA Sparkle Day began the investigation follow up.LPA Day attempted to contact Reporting party and Facility to obtain further information. This facility closed on 5/23/25 .No residents are available for interview. No further informaCDSS inspection report, September 30, 2025 · control 18-AS-20220121114610

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are prepping resident pills a week in advance
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility in order to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Licensee, Esta Hobbs who was informed of the purpose of the visit. During the visit, Hobbs needed to attend to a private matter and LPA met with Staff, Mauhammad Alvi, LPA conducted interviews and conducted a walk through. It was alleged that staff prepare medication (1) week in advanced for the facility residents. LPA conducted a walk through and inspection of the resident medications and observed no prepoured medications. LPA conducted (2) staff interviews who confirmed medications are not prepoured for residents. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided. *LPA was offsite from 11:45pm to 12:45pm UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 10, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240702104759

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained fracture while in care due to staff neglect Staff mismanaged resident's medication.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility in order to investigate and deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Licensee, Esta Hobbs, who was informed of the purpose of the visit. The department conducted interviews and records reviews. It was alleged that Resident#1 (R1) sustained a fracture on 09/11/2022 after sustaining three (3) falls at the facility due to staff neglect. Hospital discharge records dated 09/12/2022, showed R1 had a diagnosis of a comminuted displaced right femur fracture. Based on staff interviews, three (3) staff assisted R1 on 9/11/2022. Staff reported R1 was the only “wanderer” and that R1’s responsible party had informed the facility that R1 was a “fall risk”. A review of hospice notes dated 08/16/2022 revealed facility staff received training for fall prevention. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 9, 2023 · control 18-AS-20220926205159
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not releasing resident's records to resident's authorized respresntative.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola conducted an unannounced visit to the facility in order to deliver findings for the allegation above. LPA met with Licensee, Esta Hobbs, who was informed of the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted records review and interviews regarding the allegation that the facility was not providing Resident #1 (R1)'s records to their responsible party. LPA conducted records reviews of text messages sent on 11/11/2022 where R1's daily notes were being requested and staff stated in these texts that R1 did not have any such notes. Staff interview was conducted which corroborated the statements in the text messages. However, upon conducting record review of R1’s file LPA found a caregiver note dated 7/17/2022. Staff was asked about this note and it was revealed that this information was not provided due to requests of incident happening on September 2022 with R1. However, text exchange clearly stated that notes were being requested from July 2022 to SepteCDSS inspection report, November 9, 2023 · control 18-AS-20230301155159
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResident was sexually abused while in care
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings regarding the above allegations. LPA Prieto met with licensee Esa Hobbs. The investigation was conducted by Department staff. Interviews conducted revealed that Client 1 (C1) denied anyone has hurt her or touched her inappropriately while residing at the facility. C1 stated that alleged perpetrator has never made her feel uncomfortable and does not recall telling a witness that C1 has ever been abused. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that Resident was sexually abused while in care. We have found that the complaint was Unfounded, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, February 2, 2023 · control 18-AS-20200929095926

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 17 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
3
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
6
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
17
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Temple Court Senior Care?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Esta Hobbs, who operates 3 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(951) 461-4750
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Temple Court Senior Care? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.