Pico De Loro is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Perris, Riverside County, California — state license #336407734, licensed for 45 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 27 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated July 8, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

1 home in view

Pico De Loro

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 45 residents · Perris, CA · Riverside County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #336407734, held since 2003 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
620 North Perris Blvd · Perris, Riverside County
Phone
(951) 943-8081
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 45 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 10 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 45 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
FORTY-FIVE (45) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS, OF WHICH 45 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED FOR HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TEN (10). APPROVED FOR LOCKED PERIMETER.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 32 times and filed 27 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 8, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 8, 2026
Occupancy at the October 3, 2025 visit
37 of 45 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 17 documents with transcribed findings, dated December 20, 2021 to October 3, 2025. 17 of the 17 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (12). 17 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 17 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 22 of 27 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jul 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20256 state visits · 12 documents
Oct 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident being overcharged for services

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility in order to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Licensee, Efren Rilo, who was informed of the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA conducted interviews, documented observations/conducted a walk through, and conducted records review. It was alleged “Resident being overcharged for services”. It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was being overcharged for services by the facility applying R1’s personal and Incidental funds (P and I) to pay for R1’s owed rental amount. The Department conducted an audit, interviews, and records review. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250513170142
Aug 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff refused to accept resident back into the facility.

On August 10, 2025, the California Department of Social Services/Community Care Licensing (CDSS/CCL) Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ernand Dabuet conducted a subsequent unannounced complaint visit. Administrator Genessis Garcia greeted the LPA. (LPA) explained that the purpose of the visit is to investigate the allegation mentioned above. The investigation included interviews, a collection of records, and a tour of the facility. Interviews were conducted with Resident #1 to Resident #7, Staff #1 through Staff #6 (S1-S6), and Witness #1 (W1). The Department reviewed several documents, including the Register of Facility Residents LIC 9020 (dated 07/14/25), the Personnel Report LIC 500 (dated 07/01/25) and Resident #1 (R1)'s Physicians Report LIC 624A (dated 12/10/22), Residential Care for Elderly Admission Agreement (dated 12/09/22), Identification and Emergency Information LIC 601 (dated 12/09/22), Narrative Charting (dated 02/10/23 through 02/15/23) and telecommunications messages datthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 10, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230216085532
Aug 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff forged a confidential document for a resident. Staff are financially abusing a resident while in care.

On August 10, 2025, the California Department of Social Services/Community Care Licensing (CDSS/CCL) Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ernand Dabuet conducted a subsequent unannounced complaint visit. Administrator Genessis Garcia greeted the LPA. (LPA) explained that the purpose of the visit is to investigate the allegations mentioned above. The investigation included interviews, a collection of records, and a tour of the facility on November 11, 2023, August 09, 2025, and August 10, 2025. Interviews were conducted with Resident #1 to Resident #7, Staff #1 through Staff #6 (S1-S6). The Department reviewed several documents, including the Register of Facility Residents LIC 9020 (dated 07/14/25), the Personnel Report LIC 500 (dated 07/01/25) and Resident #1 (R1)'s Physicians Report LIC 624A (dated 09/19/24 & 01/05/23), In Service/Meeting Training(dated 06/08/25), and as well as other pertinent records associated with this complaint. (Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 10, 2025 · control 18-AS-20231020110520
Aug 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained unexplained bruising while in care.

On 08/10/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility above. LPA met with the Administrator Genessis Garcia, and the purpose of the visit was to deliver findings. On 08/09/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate a complaint investigation into the allegation above. LPA met with the Administrators Vivien Rillo and Genessis Garcia, and the purpose of the visit was explained. The investigation included the following: On 08/09/2025, LPA obtained the staff and residents roster (dated 07/01/2025), Resident #1's records, Face sheet. The investigation also reviewed the admission agreement (dated 02/09/2016), Physician Report (dated 05/31/2022), Preplacement Appraisal Information, Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan (dated 04/01/2023), Medication Administration Records.Unusual Incident/Injury report (dated 06/06/2022). The LPA conducted six staff and seven resithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 10, 2025 · control 18-AS-20220607081916
Aug 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff member hit resident in care. Staff member threatened resident in care. Staff member handled resident in care in a rough manner. Staff member yelled at resident in care. Staff member did not treat resident in care with dignity. Staff member did not ensure that resident in care had access to clean linens.

On August 10, 2025, the California Department of Social Services Community Care Licensing (CDSS/CCL) staff conducted a subsequent complaint visit to continue investigation and to deliver findings. The Department met with Administrator Genesis Garcia who assisted with this visit. Investigation consisted of: On May 13.2024, the Department conducted an initial complaint visit and determined that this investigation required further inquiry and possible additional visits and/or phone calls may be necessary to determine findings. On 7/23/25, the Department obtained (via email) and reviewed the following documents: Staff roster (dated 7/1/25), Resident Roster (dated 7/7/25), R1’s Pre-placement appraisal (dated 1/18/24) R1’s Physician’s report for RCFE (dated 2/24/25, Medical Progress notes (dated 5/8/24) Internal investigation notes-- written statements (dated 5/7/24, 5/1/24) Incident Report/SOC341 (dated 5/7/25), Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan (dated 2/11/2024) and staff training on residthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 10, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240507145414
Aug 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent resident from being injured by another resident. Facility staff did not ensure resident's furniture was in good repair.

On 08/10/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted a subsequent complaints investigation into the allegations above to deliver findings. LPA met with the staff, and the purpose of the visit was explained. LPA toured the facility and inspected six residents' rooms. The investigation consisted of the following: On July 29, 2025, LPA obtained the staff and resident roster (dated July 14, 2025), Resident #1's records, and the Face sheet. The investigation also reviewed the admission agreement (dated December 14, 2022), Physician Report (dated December 14, 2022), Preplacement Appraisal Information, Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan (dated December 26, 2022), Medication Administration Records, and Unusual Incident/Injury Reports (dated December 18, 2022, January 11, 2023, and February 21, 2023). On 07/29/25, LPA obtained the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department Report Case# PE223520058, dated 12/19/22. The Riverside University Health System R1 visit occurred on 12/18/22the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 10, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230103131101
Jul 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent resident from getting injured while in care

On July 23, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Administrator, Genessis Garcia. LPA explained the reason for the visit was to provide findings for the allegation listed above. On March 28. 2024, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging staff did not prevent resident from getting injured while in care. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, record reviews, and made observations. It was reported Resident #1 (R1) had a bruise on their eye and bruising on their hand. Additionally, it was reported the facility staff did not know how it occurred but advised R1’s roommate can be aggressive and may have hit R1. Information obtained from interview with Administrator stated R1 had bruises on their hand, but did not have a bruised eye. Administrator also denied that the bruises did not come from being hit by R2 because R2 is on hospice and require full assistance to transfer from bed to chair. Informationthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 23, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240328100409
May 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Administrator is not on the premises a sufficient number of hours to permit adequate attention to the facility Facility did not ensure that there were sufficient staff on the premises to assist and monitor residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility in order to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Yamberly Genesis Garcia, and Licensee Viven Rilo over the phone who were informed of the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA conducted interviews, conducted a walk through, and conducted records review. It was alleged that "Administrator is not on the premises a sufficient number of hours to permit adequate attention to the facility." It was alleged Staff #1 (S1) who was the administrator of the facility in May of 2024 was not present at the facility to allow visitors into the facility. It was alleged on several visits S1 was not present at the facility. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240522141952
May 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are disclosing personal information about the residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola conducted an unannounced to the facility in order to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator, Yamberly Genesis Garcia and spoke with Licensee Viven Rilo over the phone who were informed on the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted interviews and records review. It was alleged "Staff are disclosing personal information about the residents." It was alleged staff speak to others about Resident #1 (R1)'s personal information including those who was not R1's legal representative. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250512145014
20247 state visits · 7 documents
Nov 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff sexually assualted resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Yolanda Delgado made an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate a complaint investigation into the allegation listed above. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed documents pertaining to the allegation. It was alleged staff sexually assaulted resident on the night of June 17, 2024, “inserted gauze into their rectal cavity 10 to 15 times”. Interviews with facility staff and Reporting party revealed R1 was hospitalized from June 16th through June 18, 2024. The LPA interviewed R1 and R1 denied that they were sexually assaulted while hospitalized. LPA also reviewed R1’s admitting documents and discharge documents from the hospital to corroborate the time frame of R1’s hospitalization and no facility staff could not have sexually assaulted R1 at the facility as R1 was hospitalized when the allegation was made. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging "staff sexually assaulted resident". We have found that the compthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 20, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240619112634
May 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not conduct a preadmissions assessment

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the allegation listed above. LPA was granted entry and met with Administrative Assistant Yamberly Genesis Garcia, who was Informed of the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation “Staff did not conduct a preadmissions assessment”, it was alleged Administrator Efren Rillo did not conduct a preadmissions assessment for Resident One (R1) that reflects R1's level of care. R1 was admitted to the facility on 04/24/2014. R1's Resident Appraisal form was signed and dated on 04/25/2014 revealing prior to R1's admission, a determination of the prospective resident's suitability for admission and appraisal of R1's individual service needs, feeding, toileting, transferring, and grooming was not completed. Based on records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Dthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240305095021
Apr 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff left residents alone without adequate supervision Staff did not keep the facility clean or sanitary Staff did not ensure that residents were adequately fed

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility in order to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Efren Rillo who was informed of the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA conducted interviews, documented observations, and conducted records reviews. It was alleged that "Staff left residents alone without adequate supervision", and there was no staff at the facility. It was alleged that on 4/22/2024 at 10:30am there were no staff at the facility. LPA conducted a records review of the staff schedule for Monday 4/22/2024 and found there were (9) staff working at the facility. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240422165732
Mar 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide responsible party 60 day notice of fee increases

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the allegation listed above. LPA was granted entry and met with Administrative Assistant Yamberly Genesis Garcia, who was Informed of the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation “Staff did not provide responsible party 60-day notice of fee increases”, it was alleged a verbal, not written, notice was given to Resident 1 (R1) and/or their Power of Attorney (POA) regarding an increase in the monthly rate for R1. Interview with Administrator (AD) Efren Rillo revealed an increase in the level of care was needed for R1, and their monthly rate was adjusted to reflect the increase. AD Rillo also revealed he only provided a verbal notice concerning the increased rate. Based on interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6), are being cited onthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240305095021
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are barricading the residents while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate and deliver findings to the above allegation. LPA was granted entry and met with Administrator Efren Rillo. Regarding the allegation "Staff are barricading the residents while in care" LPA conducted staff and resident interviews that do not corroborate the allegation listed above. Resident interviews revealed they do not feel that they are barricaded while in care at the facility and can leave to go out to the community if needed. Interviews with Staff interviews reveal residents are able to go out into the community if they are physically and mentally capable. LPA conducted a tour of the facility and observed and inspected the exit doors leading outside the facility. The facility doors were unlocked and residents had access to the courtyard and shaded seating area outside. LPA noticed a gate along the outside perimeter that was locked. LPA observed the front door of the facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 13, 2023 · control 18-AS-20231020110520
Sep 19, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints3typical 2
Total complaints15typical 7
State visits on file32typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2003.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026110202561212024772202344020221102021240
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Riverside County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (951) 943-8081

Is Pico De Loro licensed?

Yes — Pico De Loro is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Perris (Riverside County): California license #336407734, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 45 residents. State records list 27 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 8, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Pico De Loro care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Pico De Loro with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordFORTY-FIVE (45) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS, OF WHICH 45 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED FOR HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TEN (10). APPROVED FOR LOCKED PERIMETER.

How much does Pico De Loro cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Pico De Loro's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Riverside County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Pico De Loro accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Pico De Loro through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Riverside County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

37 of 45 beds occupied (82%) when the state visited on October 3, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Pico De Loro?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 32 state visits and 27 dated documents since 2021 for Pico De Loro; 17 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 3, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

17 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident being overcharged for services
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility in order to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Licensee, Efren Rilo, who was informed of the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA conducted interviews, documented observations/conducted a walk through, and conducted records review. It was alleged “Resident being overcharged for services”. It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was being overcharged for services by the facility applying R1’s personal and Incidental funds (P and I) to pay for R1’s owed rental amount. The Department conducted an audit, interviews, and records review. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 3, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250513170142
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff refused to accept resident back into the facility.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On August 10, 2025, the California Department of Social Services/Community Care Licensing (CDSS/CCL) Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ernand Dabuet conducted a subsequent unannounced complaint visit. Administrator Genessis Garcia greeted the LPA. (LPA) explained that the purpose of the visit is to investigate the allegation mentioned above. The investigation included interviews, a collection of records, and a tour of the facility. Interviews were conducted with Resident #1 to Resident #7, Staff #1 through Staff #6 (S1-S6), and Witness #1 (W1). The Department reviewed several documents, including the Register of Facility Residents LIC 9020 (dated 07/14/25), the Personnel Report LIC 500 (dated 07/01/25) and Resident #1 (R1)'s Physicians Report LIC 624A (dated 12/10/22), Residential Care for Elderly Admission Agreement (dated 12/09/22), Identification and Emergency Information LIC 601 (dated 12/09/22), Narrative Charting (dated 02/10/23 through 02/15/23) and telecommunications messages datCDSS inspection report, August 10, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230216085532
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff forged a confidential document for a resident. Staff are financially abusing a resident while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On August 10, 2025, the California Department of Social Services/Community Care Licensing (CDSS/CCL) Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ernand Dabuet conducted a subsequent unannounced complaint visit. Administrator Genessis Garcia greeted the LPA. (LPA) explained that the purpose of the visit is to investigate the allegations mentioned above. The investigation included interviews, a collection of records, and a tour of the facility on November 11, 2023, August 09, 2025, and August 10, 2025. Interviews were conducted with Resident #1 to Resident #7, Staff #1 through Staff #6 (S1-S6). The Department reviewed several documents, including the Register of Facility Residents LIC 9020 (dated 07/14/25), the Personnel Report LIC 500 (dated 07/01/25) and Resident #1 (R1)'s Physicians Report LIC 624A (dated 09/19/24 & 01/05/23), In Service/Meeting Training(dated 06/08/25), and as well as other pertinent records associated with this complaint. (Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 10, 2025 · control 18-AS-20231020110520
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained unexplained bruising while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 08/10/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility above. LPA met with the Administrator Genessis Garcia, and the purpose of the visit was to deliver findings. On 08/09/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate a complaint investigation into the allegation above. LPA met with the Administrators Vivien Rillo and Genessis Garcia, and the purpose of the visit was explained. The investigation included the following: On 08/09/2025, LPA obtained the staff and residents roster (dated 07/01/2025), Resident #1's records, Face sheet. The investigation also reviewed the admission agreement (dated 02/09/2016), Physician Report (dated 05/31/2022), Preplacement Appraisal Information, Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan (dated 04/01/2023), Medication Administration Records.Unusual Incident/Injury report (dated 06/06/2022). The LPA conducted six staff and seven resiCDSS inspection report, August 10, 2025 · control 18-AS-20220607081916
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff member hit resident in care. Staff member threatened resident in care. Staff member handled resident in care in a rough manner. Staff member yelled at resident in care. Staff member did not treat resident in care with dignity. Staff member did not ensure that resident in care had access to clean linens.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On August 10, 2025, the California Department of Social Services Community Care Licensing (CDSS/CCL) staff conducted a subsequent complaint visit to continue investigation and to deliver findings. The Department met with Administrator Genesis Garcia who assisted with this visit. Investigation consisted of: On May 13.2024, the Department conducted an initial complaint visit and determined that this investigation required further inquiry and possible additional visits and/or phone calls may be necessary to determine findings. On 7/23/25, the Department obtained (via email) and reviewed the following documents: Staff roster (dated 7/1/25), Resident Roster (dated 7/7/25), R1’s Pre-placement appraisal (dated 1/18/24) R1’s Physician’s report for RCFE (dated 2/24/25, Medical Progress notes (dated 5/8/24) Internal investigation notes-- written statements (dated 5/7/24, 5/1/24) Incident Report/SOC341 (dated 5/7/25), Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan (dated 2/11/2024) and staff training on residCDSS inspection report, August 10, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240507145414
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent resident from being injured by another resident. Facility staff did not ensure resident's furniture was in good repair.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 08/10/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted a subsequent complaints investigation into the allegations above to deliver findings. LPA met with the staff, and the purpose of the visit was explained. LPA toured the facility and inspected six residents' rooms. The investigation consisted of the following: On July 29, 2025, LPA obtained the staff and resident roster (dated July 14, 2025), Resident #1's records, and the Face sheet. The investigation also reviewed the admission agreement (dated December 14, 2022), Physician Report (dated December 14, 2022), Preplacement Appraisal Information, Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan (dated December 26, 2022), Medication Administration Records, and Unusual Incident/Injury Reports (dated December 18, 2022, January 11, 2023, and February 21, 2023). On 07/29/25, LPA obtained the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department Report Case# PE223520058, dated 12/19/22. The Riverside University Health System R1 visit occurred on 12/18/22CDSS inspection report, August 10, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230103131101
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent resident from getting injured while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On July 23, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Administrator, Genessis Garcia. LPA explained the reason for the visit was to provide findings for the allegation listed above. On March 28. 2024, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging staff did not prevent resident from getting injured while in care. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, record reviews, and made observations. It was reported Resident #1 (R1) had a bruise on their eye and bruising on their hand. Additionally, it was reported the facility staff did not know how it occurred but advised R1’s roommate can be aggressive and may have hit R1. Information obtained from interview with Administrator stated R1 had bruises on their hand, but did not have a bruised eye. Administrator also denied that the bruises did not come from being hit by R2 because R2 is on hospice and require full assistance to transfer from bed to chair. InformationCDSS inspection report, July 23, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240328100409
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedAdministrator is not on the premises a sufficient number of hours to permit adequate attention to the facility Facility did not ensure that there were sufficient staff on the premises to assist and monitor residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility in order to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Yamberly Genesis Garcia, and Licensee Viven Rilo over the phone who were informed of the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA conducted interviews, conducted a walk through, and conducted records review. It was alleged that "Administrator is not on the premises a sufficient number of hours to permit adequate attention to the facility." It was alleged Staff #1 (S1) who was the administrator of the facility in May of 2024 was not present at the facility to allow visitors into the facility. It was alleged on several visits S1 was not present at the facility. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 14, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240522141952
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are disclosing personal information about the residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola conducted an unannounced to the facility in order to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator, Yamberly Genesis Garcia and spoke with Licensee Viven Rilo over the phone who were informed on the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted interviews and records review. It was alleged "Staff are disclosing personal information about the residents." It was alleged staff speak to others about Resident #1 (R1)'s personal information including those who was not R1's legal representative. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 14, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250512145014

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff sexually assualted resident
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Yolanda Delgado made an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate a complaint investigation into the allegation listed above. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed documents pertaining to the allegation. It was alleged staff sexually assaulted resident on the night of June 17, 2024, “inserted gauze into their rectal cavity 10 to 15 times”. Interviews with facility staff and Reporting party revealed R1 was hospitalized from June 16th through June 18, 2024. The LPA interviewed R1 and R1 denied that they were sexually assaulted while hospitalized. LPA also reviewed R1’s admitting documents and discharge documents from the hospital to corroborate the time frame of R1’s hospitalization and no facility staff could not have sexually assaulted R1 at the facility as R1 was hospitalized when the allegation was made. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging "staff sexually assaulted resident". We have found that the compCDSS inspection report, June 20, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240619112634
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not conduct a preadmissions assessment
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the allegation listed above. LPA was granted entry and met with Administrative Assistant Yamberly Genesis Garcia, who was Informed of the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation “Staff did not conduct a preadmissions assessment”, it was alleged Administrator Efren Rillo did not conduct a preadmissions assessment for Resident One (R1) that reflects R1's level of care. R1 was admitted to the facility on 04/24/2014. R1's Resident Appraisal form was signed and dated on 04/25/2014 revealing prior to R1's admission, a determination of the prospective resident's suitability for admission and appraisal of R1's individual service needs, feeding, toileting, transferring, and grooming was not completed. Based on records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, DCDSS inspection report, May 15, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240305095021
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff left residents alone without adequate supervision Staff did not keep the facility clean or sanitary Staff did not ensure that residents were adequately fed
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility in order to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Efren Rillo who was informed of the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA conducted interviews, documented observations, and conducted records reviews. It was alleged that "Staff left residents alone without adequate supervision", and there was no staff at the facility. It was alleged that on 4/22/2024 at 10:30am there were no staff at the facility. LPA conducted a records review of the staff schedule for Monday 4/22/2024 and found there were (9) staff working at the facility. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 26, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240422165732
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide responsible party 60 day notice of fee increases
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the allegation listed above. LPA was granted entry and met with Administrative Assistant Yamberly Genesis Garcia, who was Informed of the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation “Staff did not provide responsible party 60-day notice of fee increases”, it was alleged a verbal, not written, notice was given to Resident 1 (R1) and/or their Power of Attorney (POA) regarding an increase in the monthly rate for R1. Interview with Administrator (AD) Efren Rillo revealed an increase in the level of care was needed for R1, and their monthly rate was adjusted to reflect the increase. AD Rillo also revealed he only provided a verbal notice concerning the increased rate. Based on interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6), are being cited onCDSS inspection report, March 21, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240305095021

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are barricading the residents while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate and deliver findings to the above allegation. LPA was granted entry and met with Administrator Efren Rillo. Regarding the allegation "Staff are barricading the residents while in care" LPA conducted staff and resident interviews that do not corroborate the allegation listed above. Resident interviews revealed they do not feel that they are barricaded while in care at the facility and can leave to go out to the community if needed. Interviews with Staff interviews reveal residents are able to go out into the community if they are physically and mentally capable. LPA conducted a tour of the facility and observed and inspected the exit doors leading outside the facility. The facility doors were unlocked and residents had access to the courtyard and shaded seating area outside. LPA noticed a gate along the outside perimeter that was locked. LPA observed the front door of the facilityCDSS inspection report, November 13, 2023 · control 18-AS-20231020110520
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility force feeds residents. Facility not ensuring that resident is adequately hydrated.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On March 29, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson arrived at the facility unannounced to investigate a complaint regarding the listed allegations. LPA Mixson met with Administrator introduced self and stated the purpose of the visit. Present in the facility are 32 residents and 10 staff including caregivers. LPA Mixson toured the facility, along with the Administrator, and there were no health and safety concerns observed. During this visit LPA Mixson conducted staff and resident interviews, requested and received pertinent documentation, and made observations pertaining to the listed allegations. After assessment of evidence received, the outcome of the allegation findings was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of unsubstantiated means that, "Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence strand to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur." Therefore, the allegation is found unsubstantiated at this time. LPA MixsoCDSS inspection report, March 29, 2023 · control 18-AS-20230328122459

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 32 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
3
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
15
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
32
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(951) 943-8081
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Pico De Loro? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.