Pico De Loro is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Perris, Riverside County, California — state license #336407734, licensed for 45 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 27 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated July 8, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2021, the state has visited this home 32 times and filed 27 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 8, 2026.
The state's published file for this home includes 17 documents with transcribed findings, dated December 20, 2021 to October 3, 2025. 17 of the 17 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (12). 17 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 17 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Jul 8, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 9, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 9, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 3, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident being overcharged for services
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility in order to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Licensee, Efren Rilo, who was informed of the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA conducted interviews, documented observations/conducted a walk through, and conducted records review. It was alleged “Resident being overcharged for services”. It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was being overcharged for services by the facility applying R1’s personal and Incidental funds (P and I) to pay for R1’s owed rental amount. The Department conducted an audit, interviews, and records review. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250513170142
Aug 10, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff refused to accept resident back into the facility.
On August 10, 2025, the California Department of Social Services/Community Care Licensing (CDSS/CCL) Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ernand Dabuet conducted a subsequent unannounced complaint visit. Administrator Genessis Garcia greeted the LPA. (LPA) explained that the purpose of the visit is to investigate the allegation mentioned above. The investigation included interviews, a collection of records, and a tour of the facility. Interviews were conducted with Resident #1 to Resident #7, Staff #1 through Staff #6 (S1-S6), and Witness #1 (W1). The Department reviewed several documents, including the Register of Facility Residents LIC 9020 (dated 07/14/25), the Personnel Report LIC 500 (dated 07/01/25) and Resident #1 (R1)'s Physicians Report LIC 624A (dated 12/10/22), Residential Care for Elderly Admission Agreement (dated 12/09/22), Identification and Emergency Information LIC 601 (dated 12/09/22), Narrative Charting (dated 02/10/23 through 02/15/23) and telecommunications messages datthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 10, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230216085532
Aug 10, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff forged a confidential document for a resident. Staff are financially abusing a resident while in care.
On August 10, 2025, the California Department of Social Services/Community Care Licensing (CDSS/CCL) Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ernand Dabuet conducted a subsequent unannounced complaint visit. Administrator Genessis Garcia greeted the LPA. (LPA) explained that the purpose of the visit is to investigate the allegations mentioned above. The investigation included interviews, a collection of records, and a tour of the facility on November 11, 2023, August 09, 2025, and August 10, 2025. Interviews were conducted with Resident #1 to Resident #7, Staff #1 through Staff #6 (S1-S6). The Department reviewed several documents, including the Register of Facility Residents LIC 9020 (dated 07/14/25), the Personnel Report LIC 500 (dated 07/01/25) and Resident #1 (R1)'s Physicians Report LIC 624A (dated 09/19/24 & 01/05/23), In Service/Meeting Training(dated 06/08/25), and as well as other pertinent records associated with this complaint. (Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 10, 2025 · control 18-AS-20231020110520
Aug 10, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident sustained unexplained bruising while in care.
On 08/10/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility above. LPA met with the Administrator Genessis Garcia, and the purpose of the visit was to deliver findings. On 08/09/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate a complaint investigation into the allegation above. LPA met with the Administrators Vivien Rillo and Genessis Garcia, and the purpose of the visit was explained. The investigation included the following: On 08/09/2025, LPA obtained the staff and residents roster (dated 07/01/2025), Resident #1's records, Face sheet. The investigation also reviewed the admission agreement (dated 02/09/2016), Physician Report (dated 05/31/2022), Preplacement Appraisal Information, Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan (dated 04/01/2023), Medication Administration Records.Unusual Incident/Injury report (dated 06/06/2022). The LPA conducted six staff and seven resithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 10, 2025 · control 18-AS-20220607081916
Aug 10, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff member hit resident in care. Staff member threatened resident in care. Staff member handled resident in care in a rough manner. Staff member yelled at resident in care. Staff member did not treat resident in care with dignity. Staff member did not ensure that resident in care had access to clean linens.
On August 10, 2025, the California Department of Social Services Community Care Licensing (CDSS/CCL) staff conducted a subsequent complaint visit to continue investigation and to deliver findings. The Department met with Administrator Genesis Garcia who assisted with this visit. Investigation consisted of: On May 13.2024, the Department conducted an initial complaint visit and determined that this investigation required further inquiry and possible additional visits and/or phone calls may be necessary to determine findings. On 7/23/25, the Department obtained (via email) and reviewed the following documents: Staff roster (dated 7/1/25), Resident Roster (dated 7/7/25), R1’s Pre-placement appraisal (dated 1/18/24) R1’s Physician’s report for RCFE (dated 2/24/25, Medical Progress notes (dated 5/8/24) Internal investigation notes-- written statements (dated 5/7/24, 5/1/24) Incident Report/SOC341 (dated 5/7/25), Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan (dated 2/11/2024) and staff training on residthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 10, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240507145414
Aug 10, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent resident from being injured by another resident. Facility staff did not ensure resident's furniture was in good repair.
On 08/10/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted a subsequent complaints investigation into the allegations above to deliver findings. LPA met with the staff, and the purpose of the visit was explained. LPA toured the facility and inspected six residents' rooms. The investigation consisted of the following: On July 29, 2025, LPA obtained the staff and resident roster (dated July 14, 2025), Resident #1's records, and the Face sheet. The investigation also reviewed the admission agreement (dated December 14, 2022), Physician Report (dated December 14, 2022), Preplacement Appraisal Information, Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan (dated December 26, 2022), Medication Administration Records, and Unusual Incident/Injury Reports (dated December 18, 2022, January 11, 2023, and February 21, 2023). On 07/29/25, LPA obtained the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department Report Case# PE223520058, dated 12/19/22. The Riverside University Health System R1 visit occurred on 12/18/22the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 10, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230103131101
Jul 24, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jul 23, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent resident from getting injured while in care
On July 23, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Administrator, Genessis Garcia. LPA explained the reason for the visit was to provide findings for the allegation listed above. On March 28. 2024, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging staff did not prevent resident from getting injured while in care. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, record reviews, and made observations. It was reported Resident #1 (R1) had a bruise on their eye and bruising on their hand. Additionally, it was reported the facility staff did not know how it occurred but advised R1’s roommate can be aggressive and may have hit R1. Information obtained from interview with Administrator stated R1 had bruises on their hand, but did not have a bruised eye. Administrator also denied that the bruises did not come from being hit by R2 because R2 is on hospice and require full assistance to transfer from bed to chair. Informationthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 23, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240328100409
May 14, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Administrator is not on the premises a sufficient number of hours to permit adequate attention to the facility Facility did not ensure that there were sufficient staff on the premises to assist and monitor residents
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility in order to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Yamberly Genesis Garcia, and Licensee Viven Rilo over the phone who were informed of the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA conducted interviews, conducted a walk through, and conducted records review. It was alleged that "Administrator is not on the premises a sufficient number of hours to permit adequate attention to the facility." It was alleged Staff #1 (S1) who was the administrator of the facility in May of 2024 was not present at the facility to allow visitors into the facility. It was alleged on several visits S1 was not present at the facility. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240522141952
May 14, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are disclosing personal information about the residents
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola conducted an unannounced to the facility in order to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator, Yamberly Genesis Garcia and spoke with Licensee Viven Rilo over the phone who were informed on the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted interviews and records review. It was alleged "Staff are disclosing personal information about the residents." It was alleged staff speak to others about Resident #1 (R1)'s personal information including those who was not R1's legal representative. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250512145014
Nov 13, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 24, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jul 26, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 20, 2024Unfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff sexually assualted resident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Yolanda Delgado made an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate a complaint investigation into the allegation listed above. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed documents pertaining to the allegation. It was alleged staff sexually assaulted resident on the night of June 17, 2024, “inserted gauze into their rectal cavity 10 to 15 times”. Interviews with facility staff and Reporting party revealed R1 was hospitalized from June 16th through June 18, 2024. The LPA interviewed R1 and R1 denied that they were sexually assaulted while hospitalized. LPA also reviewed R1’s admitting documents and discharge documents from the hospital to corroborate the time frame of R1’s hospitalization and no facility staff could not have sexually assaulted R1 at the facility as R1 was hospitalized when the allegation was made. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging "staff sexually assaulted resident". We have found that the compthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 20, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240619112634
May 15, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not conduct a preadmissions assessment
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the allegation listed above. LPA was granted entry and met with Administrative Assistant Yamberly Genesis Garcia, who was Informed of the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation “Staff did not conduct a preadmissions assessment”, it was alleged Administrator Efren Rillo did not conduct a preadmissions assessment for Resident One (R1) that reflects R1's level of care. R1 was admitted to the facility on 04/24/2014. R1's Resident Appraisal form was signed and dated on 04/25/2014 revealing prior to R1's admission, a determination of the prospective resident's suitability for admission and appraisal of R1's individual service needs, feeding, toileting, transferring, and grooming was not completed. Based on records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Dthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240305095021
Apr 26, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff left residents alone without adequate supervision Staff did not keep the facility clean or sanitary Staff did not ensure that residents were adequately fed
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility in order to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Efren Rillo who was informed of the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA conducted interviews, documented observations, and conducted records reviews. It was alleged that "Staff left residents alone without adequate supervision", and there was no staff at the facility. It was alleged that on 4/22/2024 at 10:30am there were no staff at the facility. LPA conducted a records review of the staff schedule for Monday 4/22/2024 and found there were (9) staff working at the facility. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240422165732
Mar 21, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide responsible party 60 day notice of fee increases
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the allegation listed above. LPA was granted entry and met with Administrative Assistant Yamberly Genesis Garcia, who was Informed of the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation “Staff did not provide responsible party 60-day notice of fee increases”, it was alleged a verbal, not written, notice was given to Resident 1 (R1) and/or their Power of Attorney (POA) regarding an increase in the monthly rate for R1. Interview with Administrator (AD) Efren Rillo revealed an increase in the level of care was needed for R1, and their monthly rate was adjusted to reflect the increase. AD Rillo also revealed he only provided a verbal notice concerning the increased rate. Based on interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6), are being cited onthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240305095021
Nov 13, 2023Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are barricading the residents while in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate and deliver findings to the above allegation. LPA was granted entry and met with Administrator Efren Rillo. Regarding the allegation "Staff are barricading the residents while in care" LPA conducted staff and resident interviews that do not corroborate the allegation listed above. Resident interviews revealed they do not feel that they are barricaded while in care at the facility and can leave to go out to the community if needed. Interviews with Staff interviews reveal residents are able to go out into the community if they are physically and mentally capable. LPA conducted a tour of the facility and observed and inspected the exit doors leading outside the facility. The facility doors were unlocked and residents had access to the courtyard and shaded seating area outside. LPA noticed a gate along the outside perimeter that was locked. LPA observed the front door of the facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 13, 2023 · control 18-AS-20231020110520
Sep 19, 2023Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Pico De Loro licensed?
Yes — Pico De Loro is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Perris (Riverside County): California license #336407734, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 45 residents. State records list 27 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 8, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.
Can Pico De Loro care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Pico De Loro with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordFORTY-FIVE (45) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS, OF WHICH 45 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED FOR HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TEN (10). APPROVED FOR LOCKED PERIMETER.
How much does Pico De Loro cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Pico De Loro's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Riverside County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Pico De Loro accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Pico De Loro through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.
Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Riverside County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
37 of 45 beds occupied (82%) when the state visited on October 3, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Pico De Loro?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 32 state visits and 27 dated documents since 2021 for Pico De Loro; 17 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 3, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2025
2024
2023
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 32 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(951) 943-8081Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Pico De Loro? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.