Wildomar Senior Assisted Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Wildomar, Riverside County, California — state license #335530171, licensed for 200 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 30 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2024, the most recent dated July 8, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2024, the state has visited this home 33 times and filed 30 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 8, 2026.
The state's published file for this home includes 17 documents with transcribed findings, dated December 26, 2024 to January 14, 2026. 17 of the 17 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (13). 17 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 17 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Jul 8, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 24, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Mar 27, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Mar 26, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jan 14, 2026Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not treat resident with dignity
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hannah Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to initiate and deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Karen Roper. On January 12, 2026, it was alleged that staff did not treat resident with dignity. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, records review, and staff, resident, and outside source interviews. According to the allegations received, on January 12, 2026, Client #1 (C1) attempted to enter Staff #1 (S1)’s office to ask a question. S1 responded by yelling and speaking rudely to S1. Interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources did not reveal that S1 yelled nor spoke rudely to C1. [CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260112213235
Jan 14, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 20, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 5, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Neglect/Lack of Supervision resulted in resident's hospitalization Licensee did not ensure resident received wound care Facility staff are not allowing resident to use wheelchair Facility staff are not allowing resident to leave bedroom
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hannah Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Karen Roper and Assistant Executive Director Theresa Gamez. On October 17, 2025, it was alleged that neglect/lack of supervision resulted in resident’s hospitalization, licensee did not ensure resident received wound care, facility staff are not allowing resident to use wheelchair, and facility staff are not allowing resident to leave bedroom. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, records review, and staff, resident, and outside source interviews. According to the allegations received, Resident #1 (R1) was hospitalized due to staff neglect and R1 did not receive wound care on October 15, 2025, as was planned to. It was alleged that R1 was confined to their bedroom and not allowed to leave and that facility staff took away theirthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 5, 2025 · control 56-AS-20251017143416
Nov 5, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee overcharged resident. Staff did not ensure that residents were accorded privacy.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hannah Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Karen Roper and Assistant Executive Director Theresa Gamez. On October 30, 2025, it was alleged that the licensee overcharged resident, and staff did not ensure that residents were accorded privacy. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, records review, and staff and resident interviews. According to the allegations received, Resident #1 (R1) has been overcharged by the facility for the last seven months. It was also alleged that staff members have entered R1’s and Resident #2 (R2)’s bedroom without permission. [CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 5, 2025 · control 56-AS-20251030143729
Oct 23, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility does not ensure that staff are awake on the premises Facility staff inappropriately speak to residents Facility pipes are in disrepair
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Becky Mann conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate a complaint investigation. LPA met with Theresa Gamez, Assistant Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of LPA pertinent record reviews, observations and interviews with staff and residents. The allegation that facility does not ensure that staff are awake on the premises. Ten (10) residents stated that they have not seen staff asleep on the premises. One (1) resident stated that a few months ago, they seen 2 night staff sleeping on the premises. Four (4) staff interviewed denied sleeping on the premises during work hours. Seven (7) staff interviewed stated that they have not seen a staff sleeping on the premises during work hours. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250812162509
Oct 3, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not give resident medication as prescribed Staff do not ensure that resident's needs are met Staff did not have resident's medication records available for emergency medical care Staff illegally evicted resident
On 10/03/2025 at 1:30PM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renese Howell-Small conducted an unannounced visit to the facility in order to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with Executive Director, Karen Roper. The investigation consisted of interviews and record review. In regards to the allegation of staff do not give resident medication as prescribed : LPA interviewed seven (7) staff and (10) residents. Staff stated that they have sufficient training in medication and denied the allegation. Residents stated that they receive their medication(s). LPA reviewed the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for R1 and did not observe any discrepancies. Based upon interviews and record review, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. In regards to the allegation of staff do not ensure that resident's needs are met: LPA reviewed Resident 1 (R1) Service Plan which confirmed that R1 mainly needed assistance with Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250617192330
Sep 18, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 5, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not safeguard resident's personal property Staff refused resident their medication Resident was not allowed to leave the facility with family
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Administrative Assistant, Theresa Gamez, and informed the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff did not safeguard resident’s personal property, Resident #1 (R1) is no longer at the facility and was not interviewed. Administrator Rooper and four (4) staff interviewed deny not safeguarding resident’s personal belongings. Five (5) out of six (6) residents interviewed deny that staff have not safeguarded their personal belongings. Regarding the allegation, staff refused resident their medication, R1 is no longer at the facility and was not interviewed. The Administrator and four (4) staff interviewed deny that they refused to give residents their medications. Six (6) residents interviewed deny that staff refused to give them their medications. Regarding the allegation, resident was not allowed to leave the facility with family, R1 is no longer at the facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 5, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250723085142
Sep 3, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Aug 1, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure the facility is kept in sanitary conditions for residents in care Staff do not ensure facility is kept free of mal odors Staff do not ensure residents receive clean linens Staff do not ensure residents are provided with adequate eating utensils Licensee does not ensure staff are adequately trained to perform care for residents Staff do not ensure required posters are placed prominently in the facility
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Prieto met Executive Director Roper and discussed the elements of the complaint. Allegation #1 - The facility is a 2 story, 4 wing facility. LPA toured facility hallways, library, common areas, med tech room, linen and storage rooms, laundry room, dinning area, kitchen and common bathrooms. LPA also toured the facility grounds. LPA found these areas to be clean and sanitary. Allegation #2 - The facility is a 2 story, 4 wing facility. LPA toured facility hallways, library, common areas, med tech room, linen and storage rooms, laundry room, dinning area, kitchen and common bathrooms. LPA also toured the facility grounds. LPA found these areas to be from odors. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 1, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250728122130
Jul 18, 2025Unfounded
Allegation investigated: Licensee is not ensuring that the facility elevator is in good repair. Staff member does not accord dignity to residents in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Karen Roper and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and review of records. First allegation: Licensee is not ensuring that the facility elevator is in good repair. Regarding allegation LPA conducted a tour of the facility and LPA observed that facilities elevator is fully functioning. LPA went over the allegation with facility administrator and the administrator informed LPA that the elevator has always been working and that they have not had any issues or complaints pertaining to their elevator. LPA informed facility administrator that the elevators in building numbers 1-3 on the independent living side have not been working for the past week. Facility Administrator informed LPA that Wildomar Senior Assisted Living is not affiliated with the independent living sidethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250716101004
Jul 10, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility has mold Facility allows drugs on premises
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez conducted an unannounced visit for the delievering findings of allegations listed above. LPA met with Business Office Manager Maggie Prado and explained today's visit. Investigation consisted of resident and staff interviews. For the allegation, facility has mold. LPA Hernandez conducted (2) staff interviews. 2 out of the 2 staff indicated the facility has never had mold. Staff #2 stated the facility is cleaned everyday and has a housekeeping schedule. LPA Hernandez conducted (6) resident interviews. 6 out of the 6 indicated they have not observed mold at the facility and the facility is kept clean. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 10, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250403160500
Jun 4, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not assist resident with medications as needed
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Karen Roper and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and review of records. First allegation: Facility staff did not assist resident with medications as needed. Regarding the allegation stated above. LPA conducted an interview with Facility Administrator who informed LPA that Resident #1 was discharged from a Skilled Nursing Facility and was admitted at Wildomar Senior Assisted Living on 5/23/2025. Administrator further explained that R#1 arrived at the facility with only four (4) pain medication (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 10-325), and that a refill order was placed however, medication was delayed due to a documentation error by R#1 primary physician. Administrator informed LPA that R#1 was transported to local hospital due to severe pain on 5/28/2025. Unsubstantiatethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 4, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250528164240
May 28, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee is not providing resident's records to their representative as necessary.
On 05/28/2025 at 09:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Melody Brown, met with Executive Director (ED) Karen Roper at Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Adult and Senior Care (ASC) San Bernardino (SB) Regional Office to deliver complaint investigation findings for the above allegation. LPA Brown explained the purpose of the requested Office Visit to ED Roper. The investigation was conducted by LPA Melody Brown. The investigation consisted of file review and interviews with relevant parties. The allegation indicates that Licensee is not providing resident's records to their representative as necessary. LPA Brown obtained evidence to corroborate the allegation. During the facility visit in 02/13/2025, Staff #1 (S1) reported to LPA Brown that S1 did not receive a records request from Resident #1 (R1) representative. Records review indicated that R1 records request was sent to the facility in 01/16/2025 via email with R1 Authorized Representative authorization and R1 records werethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250210145138
May 28, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent resident from developing a pressure injury. Staff did not ensure resident’s room was free from odors. Staff did not ensure that a resident is using clean linen at all times. Staff did not adequately assist resident with care needs.
On 05/28/2025 at 09:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Melody Brown, met with Executive Director (ED) Karen Roper at Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Adult and Senior Care (ASC) San Bernardino (SB) Regional Office to deliver complaint investigation findings for the above allegations. LPA Brown explained the purpose of the requested Office Visit to ED Roper. After introducing and identifying self, LPA Brown discussed the findings to ED Roper. The investigation was conducted by LPA Melody Brown. The investigation consisted of file review, observation and interviews with relevant parties. The first allegation indicates that staff did not prevent residents from developing a pressure injury. During the investigation, LPA Brown did not find evidence to corroborate the allegation. Interviews with four (4) of four (4) residents indicated that staff at the facility are checking on them five (5) times a day to determine if they needed a change, they needed assistance or to rotate ththe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250519145753
May 5, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee is not providing resident's records to their representative as necessary.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez conducted an unannounced visit for the delievering findings of allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator Karen Roper and explained today's visit. Investigation consisted of request of documentation. For the allegation, Licensee is not providing resident's records to their representative as necessary. LPA Hernandez spoke with Administrator Karen Ruper who stated facility did not receive request from authorized reprensentative until a later date then one stated. LPA Hernandez observed resident's representative request of doucmentation letter which stated request of resident documentation was requested via fax with date 02/07/2025. Administrator Karen stated documentation will be sent over to legal team and resident representative today 05/05/2025. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 5, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250430111009
Apr 29, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not keep the facility clean & sanitary Facility dining room has been closed for an extended period of time Staff prohibit resident from making phone calls Staff isolate residents in their rooms Staff do not assist resident with medical appointments Staff did not obtain medical assistance for resident in a timely manner
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez conducted an unannounced visit for the delievering findings of allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator Karen Roper and explained today's visit. Investigation consisted of staff and resident interviews along with request of documentation. For the allegation, Staff do not keep the facility clean & sanitary LPA Hernandez conducted (8) resident interviews. 8 out of the 8 stated the facility is kept clean and sanitary everyday. Addtionally, LPA Hernandez observed Housekeeping schedule. LPA Hernandez conducted (8) staff interviews. 8 out of the 8 staff stated the facility is kept clean and sanitized everyday. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250110161617
Apr 4, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Mar 13, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure light was fixed properly in resident bathroom. Staff did not ensure the aluminum threshold ramp was fixed/replaced to meet the residents needs.
On 03/13/2025 at 01:15 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melody Brown arrived unannounced at the facility commence and deliver the findings of a complaint investigation. LPA was greeted and granted entrance by a staff and met with Executive Director (ED) Karen Roper. LPA Brown explained the purpose of the visit with ED Roper. The investigation consisted of observation and interviews with relevant parties. First allegation: Staff did not ensure light was fixed properly in a resident bathroom.The investigation was conducted by LPA Melody Brown which consisted of observation and interviews with relevant parties. The first allegation indicates staff did not ensure light was fixed properly in a resident bathroom. During the investigation, LPA Brown was able to obtain sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. LPA Brown interviewed Resident # 1 (R1) and R1 indicated that the light in R1's bathroom at the center of the ceiling will not turn on and the busted one (1) bulb on top of Rthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 13, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250311092303
Feb 13, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee is charging resident in excess of the rate allowed for Basic Services for SSI recipient.
On 02/13/2025 at 01:15 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melody Brown arrived unannounced at the facility to deliver findings for the allegation listed above. LPA Brown was greeted and granted entry by a staff and Executive Director (ED) Karen Roper was contacted and informed of the visit. LPA Brown explained the purpose of the visit to ED Roper. The investigation consisted of interviews and a review of pertinent documentation. The investigation was conducted by LPA Melody Brown. The investigation consisted of observation and interviews with relevant parties. The allegation indicates that Licensee is charging resident in excess of the rate allowed for Basic Services for SSI recipient. During the investigation, LPA Brown did not find evidence to corroborate the allegation. Interview with Resident #1 (R1) indicated that R1 is receiving Social Security Benefits as R1 indicated that R1 was working before as a part-time office staff and worked long enough and paid Social Security taxes. Pthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 13, 2025 · control 56-AS-20241217130651
Dec 26, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure resident’s call pendant was in good repair. Staff did not assist residents with care needs in a timely manner. Licensee did not maintain facility in good repair.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico conducted an unannounced visit to investigate and deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator Karen Roper and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of staff interviews, resident interviews, and record review. For the allegation, Staff did not ensure resident’s call pendant was in good repair. During residents’ interviews, 9 out of the 10 residents stated their pendants are working. 1 out of the 10 residents was unable to collaborate on the allegation listed above. During staff interviews 6 out of the 6 staff stated resident’s pendants are working. During facility tour, LPA Rico tested residents’ pendants, all pendants observed to be working. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 26, 2024 · control 56-AS-20241224140916
Oct 4, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Apr 24, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Apr 9, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 6, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Wildomar Senior Assisted Living licensed?
Yes — Wildomar Senior Assisted Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Wildomar (Riverside County): California license #335530171, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 200 residents. State records list 30 inspection and complaint documents since 2024; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 8, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.
Can Wildomar Senior Assisted Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Wildomar Senior Assisted Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER.200 NON-AMBULATORY,OF WHICH 30 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN GROUND FLOOR APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN.WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (30).
How much does Wildomar Senior Assisted Living cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Wildomar Senior Assisted Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Riverside County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Wildomar Senior Assisted Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Wildomar Senior Assisted Living through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.
Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Riverside County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
109 of 200 beds occupied (55%) when the state visited on January 14, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Wildomar Senior Assisted Living?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 33 state visits and 30 dated documents since 2024 for Wildomar Senior Assisted Living; 17 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated January 14, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2026
2025
2024
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 33 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(323) 902-6000Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Wildomar Senior Assisted Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.