Smith Road Assisted Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Hemet, Riverside County, California — state license #331881421, licensed for 12 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 24 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2023, the most recent dated June 22, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

6 homes in view

Smith Road Assisted Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 12 residents · Hemet, CA · Riverside County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #331881421, held since 2023 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
753 Smith Road · Hemet, Riverside County
Phone
(951) 927-8178
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 7 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 5 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 12 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 7 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 5State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2023, the state has visited this home 31 times and filed 24 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 22, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 22, 2026
Occupancy at the December 17, 2025 visit
8 of 12 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 16 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 7, 2023 to December 17, 2025. 16 of the 16 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (11). 16 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 16 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 25 of 24 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20264 state visits · 4 documents
Jun 22, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202514 state visits · 19 documents
Dec 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not providing medication as prescribed

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Caregiver, Veronica Jackson, where the LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. The investigation included staff and witness interviews, as well as a review of records. On January 28, 2025, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging that staff are not providing medication as prescribed. It was alleged medication was not being dispensed to Resident #1 as prescribed, including at appropriate times and dosage. Interview with Licensee Ma Satchel Lecita stated that R1 denies the medication and staff notated refusals on Medication Logs. The licensee reported she advised R1 to bring a ten-day supply of medication, however, R1 arrived with almost none. The licensee reported R1 did not have a primary physician upon admissions so they assisted R1 with locating a physician throughthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 17, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250128082056
Dec 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff neglect resulted in resident death.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA), Armando Perez and Robert Campbell, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Perez spoke with Licensee Ma Satchel Lecita over telephone and explained both the purpose of the visit and the details of the allegation. Licensee authorized for caregiver Edith Campos to review report. The investigation included staff and witness interviews, as well as a review of records. Resident #1 was unable to be interviewed due to their passing. On April 17, 2025, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint alleging that neglect by facility staff, contributed to the death of R1. It was alleged that facility staff failed to properly administer prescribed medications, resulting in a decline in R1’s health and death, during a subsequent hospital stay. Additionally, it was alleged that actions caused by facility staff led R1 to miss medical appointments essential to their health. Cothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250417111719
Dec 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not report an incident involving resident in care as required.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abdoulaye Zerbo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA Abdoulaye was greeted and granted entrance by staff Veronica Jackson. LPA identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit. It was alleged staff did not report an incident involving a resident in care as required. LPA conducted an interview with the licensee who confirmed they did not report an incident occurring on 07/31/2024, involving Resident 1 (R1), to the Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) within the time frame required by law. A review of the Unusual Incident/Injury Report dated 08/01/2024 revealed the LTCO was notified on 08/19/2024. This corroborates the time frame required by law was not met. Based on interviews and records review, the allegation that staff did not report an incident involving a resident as required was determined to be substantiated. A substantiated finding means the allegation is valid because the preponderance of thethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 8, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240826183736
Jul 31, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide food to resident in care Staff denied visitation to resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Perez met with House Manager, Carisa Estrelles, where the LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff and witnesses and file reviews. On December 31, 2024, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging facility staff did not provide food to resident in care and denied visitation to resident. Throughout the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and residents and obtained supportive documentation to aid in determining the findings of the noted allegations. The Department interviewed Resident #1; however, the information obtained did not support of the allegations. LPA attempted to conduct a subsequent interview with R1, but R1 passed away in March 2025. No additional information was able to be obtained due to R1’s passing. Continuedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 31, 2025 · control 18-AS-20241231082009
Jul 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff hit resident Facility staff are not providing adequate food service Facility staff are not dispensing medications as precribed.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Ma Satchel Lecita, where the LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff and residents, and a review of records. On May 28, 2025, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging facility staff hit resident, facility staff are not providing adequate food service and facility staff are not dispensing medications as prescribed. It was alleged Resident 1 (R1) was physically assaulted by a male facility staff member. Resident interviews were conducted. The interviews revealed a male staff entered the room and began striking R1 for being too loud. It was reported there was a witness (W1) to the incident. Continued on LIC 9099-C. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 28, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250528091327
Jul 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility has failed to provide assistance with bathing and other hygiene needs. Facility does not respond to resident's request for assistance Residents are forced to eat in the dining room

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Perez met with Administrator Ma Satchel Lecita, where the LPA explained the purpose of the visit. On February 11, 2025, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging the facility does not provide assistance with hygiene needs, facility staff does not respond to resident's request for assistance, and residents are forced to eat in the dining room. The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, and a review of documents obtained. It was alleged facility staff did not provide assistance with hygiene needs, including bathing and toileting, and that the staff did not respond to the resident’s request for assistance. It was reported Resident 1 (R1) would be left with a soiled adult brief and staff would not assist with toileting needs when R1 when requested. Continued on LIC 9099-C. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 24, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250211125221
Jul 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that resident's toileting needs were met Staff did not ensure resident's medication was taken as prescribed.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abdoulaye Zerbo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the allegations listed above. LPA Abdoulaye was greeted and granted entrance by Caregiver Edith Campos. LPA Abdoulaye Zerbo identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit. It was alleged that staff did not ensure that resident's toileting needs were met . Concerns were raised that Resident 1 (R1) was left in soiled conditions for extended periods, resulting in rashes. During an interview, R1 reported being changed four to six times daily and whenever additional assistance was requested. Staff interviews confirmed this information. Further details revealed that R1 had appointments three to four times a week from 7 AM to 6 PM. Staff interviews also indicated that R1 was changed before leaving the facility and upon returning. However, it was noted that R1's diaper was not changed while away from the facility, which could explain the rash development. Information obtained fromthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240712211908
Jul 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff neglect resulted in resident sustaining bed sores Facility staff are not bathing resident Staff are financially abusing residents in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abdoulaye Zerbo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the allegations listed above. LPA Abdoulaye was greeted and granted entrance by Caregiver Edith Campos. LPA Abdoulaye Zerbo identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit. It was alleged that facility staff neglect resulted in Resident 1 (R1) sustaining bed sores. Concerns were made that R1 did not receive appropriate care, which resulted in R1 sustaining bedsores. A review of R1’s medical records, facility file, and care logs were completed. The information obtained revealed that R1 is regularly assisted by staff and is changed at least six times a day, as confirmed by staff members. Further information obtained from interviews revealed that R1 arrived at the facility with a spreadable health condition and not bed sores. Facility representatives stated after medical evaluation, it was determined that R1 would go to a Skilled Nursing Facility for further treatment. Facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240911142008
Jun 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee is not allowing resident to phone calls. Licensee does not allow resident to have visitors.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abdoulaye Zerbo conducted an unannounced subsequent visit for additional investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA Abdoulaye was greeted and granted entrance by staff Veronica Jackson. LPA Abdoulaye Zerbo identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit. It was alleged Staff did not allow resident to make and receive phone calls. Concerns were raised regarding staff not allowing residents to receive or make phone calls. During today’s visit, LPA observed a working phone in the office area and accessible to residents. LPA conducted interviews with multiple residents and information obtained revealed residents are allowed to use the phone and receive phone calls from family members, witnessed by R2 receiving a phone call at 12:45pm. Further information obtained revealed for residents unable to access the phone, staff will take the phone to them when requested. Continued 9099-C..... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240611165807
May 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure residents personal care needs are being met

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abdoulaye Zerbo conducted an unannounced subsequent visit for additional investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA Abdoulaye was greeted and granted entrance by staff Veronica Jackson. LPA Abdoulaye Zerbo identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit. It was alleged Staff does not ensure residents personal care needs are being met. Concerns were made regarding resident‘s (R1) overgrown toenails and facility not meeting R1’s dental care. LPA conducted interviews and information obtained revealed R1’s insurance coverage did not carry dental care when R1 was admitted at the facility 5-30-24. R1’s Power of Attorney (POA) was informed, and an application was sent by POA to obtain dental insurance. The dental insurance card came on 04-01-25 and an appointment for dental care was obtained on 04-14-25. Further information obtained from record review revealed a pediatrist visited the facility on 08-4-24 to cut R1’s toenails. Continued 809-C.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240806084343
May 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not allow resident to make and receive phone calls.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abdoulaye Zerbo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA Abdoulaye was greeted and granted entrance by staff Veronica Jackson. LPA identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit. It was alleged staff did not allow resident to make and receive phone calls. LPA conducted resident interviews where 8 of 8 interviews revealed residents are allowed to use the facility phone to make calls and also receive phone calls. A relevant witness interview revealed they called the facility at least twice a month in June of 2024, July of 2024 and August 2024. The witness reported each time they called, they were told R1 was either sleeping or unavailable. R1 was interviewed and reported they have a personal phone to make and receive calls. Continued 9099-C...... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240826183736
May 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not notify responsible representative regarding incident involving resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Perez met with Administrator, Ma Satchel Lecita, where the LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff and witnesses and file reviews. On March 10, 2025, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging that staff did not notify responsible representative regarding an incident involving Resident. It was alleged that on March 8, 2025, Resident (R1) was transferred to the hospital for medical evaluation and assistance. It further alleged that staff did not report the hospitalization with R1’s designated responsible representative. Information obtained from Administrator, Ma Satchel Lecita stated that R1 did not provide a responsible party during the intake process. Administrator also denied that there was written or verbal instruction tothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 13, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250310124409
Apr 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee wrongfully refused to allow resident to enter the facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator, Ma Satchel Lecita, where LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff and residents. On January 28, 2024, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging that licensee wrongfully refused to allow resident to enter the facility. It was reported that on January 30, 2025, C1 was not allowed entrance into the facility after returning from a medical appointment. LPA conducted interview with Administrator, and it was revealed that Administrator refused C1 entrance into the facility and instructed C1 to contact their responsible party to pick C1 up. According to Administrator, C1 was banging on the front door and yelling explicit language towards staff. The actions of C1 caused the other residents to become agitated. Athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250128082056
Mar 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee wrongfully refused to allow resident to enter the facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator, Ma Satchel Lecita, where LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff and residents. On January 28, 2024, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging that licensee wrongfully refused to allow resident to enter the facility. It was reported that on January 30, 2025, C1 was not allowed entrance into the facility after returning from a medical appointment. LPA conducted interview with Administrator, and it was revealed that Administrator refused C1 entrance into the facility and instructed C1 to contact their responsible party to pick C1 up. According to Administrator, C1 was banging on the front door and yelling explicit language towards staff. The actions of C1 caused the other residents to become agitated. Athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250128082056
Feb 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 31, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unlawful eviction.

On 1/31/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janette Romero made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings regarding the allegation listed above. LPA met with Caregiver, Juana Gonzalez who was informed of the purpose of the visit. Licensee, Ma Satchel Lecita arrived during the visit and was also informed of the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, "Unlawful eviction" it was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) was given an eviction notice for non-compliance of house rules, but was not provided supporting facts of these concerns. Records reviewed indicated R1 was provided with a written eviction notice on 12/30/2024, which did not contain specific required facts including dates, places, witnessess and circumstances related to non-compliance of house rules. Licensee was interviewed and reported the supporting information was not provided to R1 in the eviction notice. Consultation of eviction regulations was provided to Licensee. Licensee has now expressed understandingthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 31, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250115150201
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 31, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 0
Type B citations3typical 0
Substantiated complaints4typical 0
Total complaints14typical 1
State visits on file31typical 8
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 307 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2023.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202644020251419420242202023330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Riverside County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (951) 927-8178

Is Smith Road Assisted Living licensed?

Yes — Smith Road Assisted Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Hemet (Riverside County): California license #331881421, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 12 residents. State records list 24 inspection and complaint documents since 2023; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 22, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Smith Road Assisted Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Smith Road Assisted Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 12 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 7 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 5

How much does Smith Road Assisted Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Smith Road Assisted Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Riverside County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Smith Road Assisted Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Smith Road Assisted Living is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

8 of 12 beds occupied (67%) when the state visited on December 17, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Smith Road Assisted Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 31 state visits and 24 dated documents since 2023 for Smith Road Assisted Living; 16 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 17, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

16 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not providing medication as prescribed
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Caregiver, Veronica Jackson, where the LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. The investigation included staff and witness interviews, as well as a review of records. On January 28, 2025, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging that staff are not providing medication as prescribed. It was alleged medication was not being dispensed to Resident #1 as prescribed, including at appropriate times and dosage. Interview with Licensee Ma Satchel Lecita stated that R1 denies the medication and staff notated refusals on Medication Logs. The licensee reported she advised R1 to bring a ten-day supply of medication, however, R1 arrived with almost none. The licensee reported R1 did not have a primary physician upon admissions so they assisted R1 with locating a physician throughCDSS inspection report, December 17, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250128082056
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff neglect resulted in resident death.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA), Armando Perez and Robert Campbell, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Perez spoke with Licensee Ma Satchel Lecita over telephone and explained both the purpose of the visit and the details of the allegation. Licensee authorized for caregiver Edith Campos to review report. The investigation included staff and witness interviews, as well as a review of records. Resident #1 was unable to be interviewed due to their passing. On April 17, 2025, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint alleging that neglect by facility staff, contributed to the death of R1. It was alleged that facility staff failed to properly administer prescribed medications, resulting in a decline in R1’s health and death, during a subsequent hospital stay. Additionally, it was alleged that actions caused by facility staff led R1 to miss medical appointments essential to their health. CoCDSS inspection report, December 16, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250417111719
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not report an incident involving resident in care as required.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abdoulaye Zerbo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA Abdoulaye was greeted and granted entrance by staff Veronica Jackson. LPA identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit. It was alleged staff did not report an incident involving a resident in care as required. LPA conducted an interview with the licensee who confirmed they did not report an incident occurring on 07/31/2024, involving Resident 1 (R1), to the Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) within the time frame required by law. A review of the Unusual Incident/Injury Report dated 08/01/2024 revealed the LTCO was notified on 08/19/2024. This corroborates the time frame required by law was not met. Based on interviews and records review, the allegation that staff did not report an incident involving a resident as required was determined to be substantiated. A substantiated finding means the allegation is valid because the preponderance of theCDSS inspection report, August 8, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240826183736
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide food to resident in care Staff denied visitation to resident in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Perez met with House Manager, Carisa Estrelles, where the LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff and witnesses and file reviews. On December 31, 2024, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging facility staff did not provide food to resident in care and denied visitation to resident. Throughout the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and residents and obtained supportive documentation to aid in determining the findings of the noted allegations. The Department interviewed Resident #1; however, the information obtained did not support of the allegations. LPA attempted to conduct a subsequent interview with R1, but R1 passed away in March 2025. No additional information was able to be obtained due to R1’s passing. ContinuedCDSS inspection report, July 31, 2025 · control 18-AS-20241231082009
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff hit resident Facility staff are not providing adequate food service Facility staff are not dispensing medications as precribed.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Ma Satchel Lecita, where the LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff and residents, and a review of records. On May 28, 2025, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging facility staff hit resident, facility staff are not providing adequate food service and facility staff are not dispensing medications as prescribed. It was alleged Resident 1 (R1) was physically assaulted by a male facility staff member. Resident interviews were conducted. The interviews revealed a male staff entered the room and began striking R1 for being too loud. It was reported there was a witness (W1) to the incident. Continued on LIC 9099-C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 28, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250528091327
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has failed to provide assistance with bathing and other hygiene needs. Facility does not respond to resident's request for assistance Residents are forced to eat in the dining room
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Perez met with Administrator Ma Satchel Lecita, where the LPA explained the purpose of the visit. On February 11, 2025, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging the facility does not provide assistance with hygiene needs, facility staff does not respond to resident's request for assistance, and residents are forced to eat in the dining room. The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, and a review of documents obtained. It was alleged facility staff did not provide assistance with hygiene needs, including bathing and toileting, and that the staff did not respond to the resident’s request for assistance. It was reported Resident 1 (R1) would be left with a soiled adult brief and staff would not assist with toileting needs when R1 when requested. Continued on LIC 9099-C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 24, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250211125221
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure that resident's toileting needs were met Staff did not ensure resident's medication was taken as prescribed.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abdoulaye Zerbo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the allegations listed above. LPA Abdoulaye was greeted and granted entrance by Caregiver Edith Campos. LPA Abdoulaye Zerbo identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit. It was alleged that staff did not ensure that resident's toileting needs were met . Concerns were raised that Resident 1 (R1) was left in soiled conditions for extended periods, resulting in rashes. During an interview, R1 reported being changed four to six times daily and whenever additional assistance was requested. Staff interviews confirmed this information. Further details revealed that R1 had appointments three to four times a week from 7 AM to 6 PM. Staff interviews also indicated that R1 was changed before leaving the facility and upon returning. However, it was noted that R1's diaper was not changed while away from the facility, which could explain the rash development. Information obtained fromCDSS inspection report, July 18, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240712211908
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff neglect resulted in resident sustaining bed sores Facility staff are not bathing resident Staff are financially abusing residents in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abdoulaye Zerbo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the allegations listed above. LPA Abdoulaye was greeted and granted entrance by Caregiver Edith Campos. LPA Abdoulaye Zerbo identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit. It was alleged that facility staff neglect resulted in Resident 1 (R1) sustaining bed sores. Concerns were made that R1 did not receive appropriate care, which resulted in R1 sustaining bedsores. A review of R1’s medical records, facility file, and care logs were completed. The information obtained revealed that R1 is regularly assisted by staff and is changed at least six times a day, as confirmed by staff members. Further information obtained from interviews revealed that R1 arrived at the facility with a spreadable health condition and not bed sores. Facility representatives stated after medical evaluation, it was determined that R1 would go to a Skilled Nursing Facility for further treatment. FacilityCDSS inspection report, July 18, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240911142008
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee is not allowing resident to phone calls. Licensee does not allow resident to have visitors.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abdoulaye Zerbo conducted an unannounced subsequent visit for additional investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA Abdoulaye was greeted and granted entrance by staff Veronica Jackson. LPA Abdoulaye Zerbo identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit. It was alleged Staff did not allow resident to make and receive phone calls. Concerns were raised regarding staff not allowing residents to receive or make phone calls. During today’s visit, LPA observed a working phone in the office area and accessible to residents. LPA conducted interviews with multiple residents and information obtained revealed residents are allowed to use the phone and receive phone calls from family members, witnessed by R2 receiving a phone call at 12:45pm. Further information obtained revealed for residents unable to access the phone, staff will take the phone to them when requested. Continued 9099-C..... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 21, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240611165807
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure residents personal care needs are being met
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abdoulaye Zerbo conducted an unannounced subsequent visit for additional investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA Abdoulaye was greeted and granted entrance by staff Veronica Jackson. LPA Abdoulaye Zerbo identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit. It was alleged Staff does not ensure residents personal care needs are being met. Concerns were made regarding resident‘s (R1) overgrown toenails and facility not meeting R1’s dental care. LPA conducted interviews and information obtained revealed R1’s insurance coverage did not carry dental care when R1 was admitted at the facility 5-30-24. R1’s Power of Attorney (POA) was informed, and an application was sent by POA to obtain dental insurance. The dental insurance card came on 04-01-25 and an appointment for dental care was obtained on 04-14-25. Further information obtained from record review revealed a pediatrist visited the facility on 08-4-24 to cut R1’s toenails. Continued 809-C.CDSS inspection report, May 21, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240806084343
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not allow resident to make and receive phone calls.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abdoulaye Zerbo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA Abdoulaye was greeted and granted entrance by staff Veronica Jackson. LPA identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit. It was alleged staff did not allow resident to make and receive phone calls. LPA conducted resident interviews where 8 of 8 interviews revealed residents are allowed to use the facility phone to make calls and also receive phone calls. A relevant witness interview revealed they called the facility at least twice a month in June of 2024, July of 2024 and August 2024. The witness reported each time they called, they were told R1 was either sleeping or unavailable. R1 was interviewed and reported they have a personal phone to make and receive calls. Continued 9099-C...... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 21, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240826183736
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not notify responsible representative regarding incident involving resident.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Perez met with Administrator, Ma Satchel Lecita, where the LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff and witnesses and file reviews. On March 10, 2025, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging that staff did not notify responsible representative regarding an incident involving Resident. It was alleged that on March 8, 2025, Resident (R1) was transferred to the hospital for medical evaluation and assistance. It further alleged that staff did not report the hospitalization with R1’s designated responsible representative. Information obtained from Administrator, Ma Satchel Lecita stated that R1 did not provide a responsible party during the intake process. Administrator also denied that there was written or verbal instruction toCDSS inspection report, May 13, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250310124409
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee wrongfully refused to allow resident to enter the facility
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator, Ma Satchel Lecita, where LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff and residents. On January 28, 2024, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging that licensee wrongfully refused to allow resident to enter the facility. It was reported that on January 30, 2025, C1 was not allowed entrance into the facility after returning from a medical appointment. LPA conducted interview with Administrator, and it was revealed that Administrator refused C1 entrance into the facility and instructed C1 to contact their responsible party to pick C1 up. According to Administrator, C1 was banging on the front door and yelling explicit language towards staff. The actions of C1 caused the other residents to become agitated. ACDSS inspection report, March 14, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250128082056
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee wrongfully refused to allow resident to enter the facility
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator, Ma Satchel Lecita, where LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff and residents. On January 28, 2024, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging that licensee wrongfully refused to allow resident to enter the facility. It was reported that on January 30, 2025, C1 was not allowed entrance into the facility after returning from a medical appointment. LPA conducted interview with Administrator, and it was revealed that Administrator refused C1 entrance into the facility and instructed C1 to contact their responsible party to pick C1 up. According to Administrator, C1 was banging on the front door and yelling explicit language towards staff. The actions of C1 caused the other residents to become agitated. ACDSS inspection report, March 14, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250128082056
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnlawful eviction.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 1/31/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janette Romero made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings regarding the allegation listed above. LPA met with Caregiver, Juana Gonzalez who was informed of the purpose of the visit. Licensee, Ma Satchel Lecita arrived during the visit and was also informed of the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, "Unlawful eviction" it was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) was given an eviction notice for non-compliance of house rules, but was not provided supporting facts of these concerns. Records reviewed indicated R1 was provided with a written eviction notice on 12/30/2024, which did not contain specific required facts including dates, places, witnessess and circumstances related to non-compliance of house rules. Licensee was interviewed and reported the supporting information was not provided to R1 in the eviction notice. Consultation of eviction regulations was provided to Licensee. Licensee has now expressed understandingCDSS inspection report, January 31, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250115150201

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnlicensed care being provided
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Tricia Danielson and Jesse Gardner arrived unannounced to initiate an investigation into the allegation listed above. LPAs met with Administrator Ma Satchel Lecita and explained the purpose of the visit. This home currently has eight (8) residents residing here. LPAs interviewed eight (8) residents. Five (5) of eight (8) residents do not require care and supervision and are independent on all activities of daily living (ADLs). Three (3) of eight (8) (R2, R5, R8) are receiving hospice services from outside agencies for assistance with ADLs. LPAs verified hospice services with the agencies for all three (3) residents. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided along with LIC811- Confidential Names list. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 7, 2023 · control 18-AS-20230227095711

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 31 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for mid-size homes (7–15 beds), computed across all 307 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
14
typical for this size: 1
State visits on file
31
typical for this size: 8
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(951) 927-8178
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Smith Road Assisted Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.