Smith Road Assisted Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Hemet, Riverside County, California — state license #331881421, licensed for 12 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 24 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2023, the most recent dated June 22, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2023, the state has visited this home 31 times and filed 24 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 22, 2026.
The state's published file for this home includes 16 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 7, 2023 to December 17, 2025. 16 of the 16 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (11). 16 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 16 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Jun 22, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 16, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 11, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jan 16, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 17, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not providing medication as prescribed
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Caregiver, Veronica Jackson, where the LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. The investigation included staff and witness interviews, as well as a review of records. On January 28, 2025, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging that staff are not providing medication as prescribed. It was alleged medication was not being dispensed to Resident #1 as prescribed, including at appropriate times and dosage. Interview with Licensee Ma Satchel Lecita stated that R1 denies the medication and staff notated refusals on Medication Logs. The licensee reported she advised R1 to bring a ten-day supply of medication, however, R1 arrived with almost none. The licensee reported R1 did not have a primary physician upon admissions so they assisted R1 with locating a physician throughthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 17, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250128082056
Dec 16, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff neglect resulted in resident death.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA), Armando Perez and Robert Campbell, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Perez spoke with Licensee Ma Satchel Lecita over telephone and explained both the purpose of the visit and the details of the allegation. Licensee authorized for caregiver Edith Campos to review report. The investigation included staff and witness interviews, as well as a review of records. Resident #1 was unable to be interviewed due to their passing. On April 17, 2025, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint alleging that neglect by facility staff, contributed to the death of R1. It was alleged that facility staff failed to properly administer prescribed medications, resulting in a decline in R1’s health and death, during a subsequent hospital stay. Additionally, it was alleged that actions caused by facility staff led R1 to miss medical appointments essential to their health. Cothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250417111719
Dec 16, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Aug 8, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not report an incident involving resident in care as required.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abdoulaye Zerbo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA Abdoulaye was greeted and granted entrance by staff Veronica Jackson. LPA identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit. It was alleged staff did not report an incident involving a resident in care as required. LPA conducted an interview with the licensee who confirmed they did not report an incident occurring on 07/31/2024, involving Resident 1 (R1), to the Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) within the time frame required by law. A review of the Unusual Incident/Injury Report dated 08/01/2024 revealed the LTCO was notified on 08/19/2024. This corroborates the time frame required by law was not met. Based on interviews and records review, the allegation that staff did not report an incident involving a resident as required was determined to be substantiated. A substantiated finding means the allegation is valid because the preponderance of thethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 8, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240826183736
Jul 31, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide food to resident in care Staff denied visitation to resident in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Perez met with House Manager, Carisa Estrelles, where the LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff and witnesses and file reviews. On December 31, 2024, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging facility staff did not provide food to resident in care and denied visitation to resident. Throughout the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and residents and obtained supportive documentation to aid in determining the findings of the noted allegations. The Department interviewed Resident #1; however, the information obtained did not support of the allegations. LPA attempted to conduct a subsequent interview with R1, but R1 passed away in March 2025. No additional information was able to be obtained due to R1’s passing. Continuedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 31, 2025 · control 18-AS-20241231082009
Jul 28, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff hit resident Facility staff are not providing adequate food service Facility staff are not dispensing medications as precribed.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Ma Satchel Lecita, where the LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff and residents, and a review of records. On May 28, 2025, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging facility staff hit resident, facility staff are not providing adequate food service and facility staff are not dispensing medications as prescribed. It was alleged Resident 1 (R1) was physically assaulted by a male facility staff member. Resident interviews were conducted. The interviews revealed a male staff entered the room and began striking R1 for being too loud. It was reported there was a witness (W1) to the incident. Continued on LIC 9099-C. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 28, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250528091327
Jul 24, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility has failed to provide assistance with bathing and other hygiene needs. Facility does not respond to resident's request for assistance Residents are forced to eat in the dining room
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Perez met with Administrator Ma Satchel Lecita, where the LPA explained the purpose of the visit. On February 11, 2025, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging the facility does not provide assistance with hygiene needs, facility staff does not respond to resident's request for assistance, and residents are forced to eat in the dining room. The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, and a review of documents obtained. It was alleged facility staff did not provide assistance with hygiene needs, including bathing and toileting, and that the staff did not respond to the resident’s request for assistance. It was reported Resident 1 (R1) would be left with a soiled adult brief and staff would not assist with toileting needs when R1 when requested. Continued on LIC 9099-C. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 24, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250211125221
Jul 18, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that resident's toileting needs were met Staff did not ensure resident's medication was taken as prescribed.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abdoulaye Zerbo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the allegations listed above. LPA Abdoulaye was greeted and granted entrance by Caregiver Edith Campos. LPA Abdoulaye Zerbo identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit. It was alleged that staff did not ensure that resident's toileting needs were met . Concerns were raised that Resident 1 (R1) was left in soiled conditions for extended periods, resulting in rashes. During an interview, R1 reported being changed four to six times daily and whenever additional assistance was requested. Staff interviews confirmed this information. Further details revealed that R1 had appointments three to four times a week from 7 AM to 6 PM. Staff interviews also indicated that R1 was changed before leaving the facility and upon returning. However, it was noted that R1's diaper was not changed while away from the facility, which could explain the rash development. Information obtained fromthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240712211908
Jul 18, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff neglect resulted in resident sustaining bed sores Facility staff are not bathing resident Staff are financially abusing residents in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abdoulaye Zerbo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the allegations listed above. LPA Abdoulaye was greeted and granted entrance by Caregiver Edith Campos. LPA Abdoulaye Zerbo identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit. It was alleged that facility staff neglect resulted in Resident 1 (R1) sustaining bed sores. Concerns were made that R1 did not receive appropriate care, which resulted in R1 sustaining bedsores. A review of R1’s medical records, facility file, and care logs were completed. The information obtained revealed that R1 is regularly assisted by staff and is changed at least six times a day, as confirmed by staff members. Further information obtained from interviews revealed that R1 arrived at the facility with a spreadable health condition and not bed sores. Facility representatives stated after medical evaluation, it was determined that R1 would go to a Skilled Nursing Facility for further treatment. Facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240911142008
Jun 18, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 21, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee is not allowing resident to phone calls. Licensee does not allow resident to have visitors.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abdoulaye Zerbo conducted an unannounced subsequent visit for additional investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA Abdoulaye was greeted and granted entrance by staff Veronica Jackson. LPA Abdoulaye Zerbo identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit. It was alleged Staff did not allow resident to make and receive phone calls. Concerns were raised regarding staff not allowing residents to receive or make phone calls. During today’s visit, LPA observed a working phone in the office area and accessible to residents. LPA conducted interviews with multiple residents and information obtained revealed residents are allowed to use the phone and receive phone calls from family members, witnessed by R2 receiving a phone call at 12:45pm. Further information obtained revealed for residents unable to access the phone, staff will take the phone to them when requested. Continued 9099-C..... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240611165807
May 21, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure residents personal care needs are being met
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abdoulaye Zerbo conducted an unannounced subsequent visit for additional investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA Abdoulaye was greeted and granted entrance by staff Veronica Jackson. LPA Abdoulaye Zerbo identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit. It was alleged Staff does not ensure residents personal care needs are being met. Concerns were made regarding resident‘s (R1) overgrown toenails and facility not meeting R1’s dental care. LPA conducted interviews and information obtained revealed R1’s insurance coverage did not carry dental care when R1 was admitted at the facility 5-30-24. R1’s Power of Attorney (POA) was informed, and an application was sent by POA to obtain dental insurance. The dental insurance card came on 04-01-25 and an appointment for dental care was obtained on 04-14-25. Further information obtained from record review revealed a pediatrist visited the facility on 08-4-24 to cut R1’s toenails. Continued 809-C.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240806084343
May 21, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not allow resident to make and receive phone calls.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abdoulaye Zerbo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA Abdoulaye was greeted and granted entrance by staff Veronica Jackson. LPA identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit. It was alleged staff did not allow resident to make and receive phone calls. LPA conducted resident interviews where 8 of 8 interviews revealed residents are allowed to use the facility phone to make calls and also receive phone calls. A relevant witness interview revealed they called the facility at least twice a month in June of 2024, July of 2024 and August 2024. The witness reported each time they called, they were told R1 was either sleeping or unavailable. R1 was interviewed and reported they have a personal phone to make and receive calls. Continued 9099-C...... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240826183736
May 13, 2025Unfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff did not notify responsible representative regarding incident involving resident.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Perez met with Administrator, Ma Satchel Lecita, where the LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff and witnesses and file reviews. On March 10, 2025, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging that staff did not notify responsible representative regarding an incident involving Resident. It was alleged that on March 8, 2025, Resident (R1) was transferred to the hospital for medical evaluation and assistance. It further alleged that staff did not report the hospitalization with R1’s designated responsible representative. Information obtained from Administrator, Ma Satchel Lecita stated that R1 did not provide a responsible party during the intake process. Administrator also denied that there was written or verbal instruction tothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 13, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250310124409
Apr 28, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Mar 14, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee wrongfully refused to allow resident to enter the facility
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator, Ma Satchel Lecita, where LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff and residents. On January 28, 2024, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging that licensee wrongfully refused to allow resident to enter the facility. It was reported that on January 30, 2025, C1 was not allowed entrance into the facility after returning from a medical appointment. LPA conducted interview with Administrator, and it was revealed that Administrator refused C1 entrance into the facility and instructed C1 to contact their responsible party to pick C1 up. According to Administrator, C1 was banging on the front door and yelling explicit language towards staff. The actions of C1 caused the other residents to become agitated. Athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250128082056
Mar 14, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee wrongfully refused to allow resident to enter the facility
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator, Ma Satchel Lecita, where LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff and residents. On January 28, 2024, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging that licensee wrongfully refused to allow resident to enter the facility. It was reported that on January 30, 2025, C1 was not allowed entrance into the facility after returning from a medical appointment. LPA conducted interview with Administrator, and it was revealed that Administrator refused C1 entrance into the facility and instructed C1 to contact their responsible party to pick C1 up. According to Administrator, C1 was banging on the front door and yelling explicit language towards staff. The actions of C1 caused the other residents to become agitated. Athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250128082056
Feb 6, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jan 31, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Unlawful eviction.
On 1/31/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janette Romero made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings regarding the allegation listed above. LPA met with Caregiver, Juana Gonzalez who was informed of the purpose of the visit. Licensee, Ma Satchel Lecita arrived during the visit and was also informed of the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, "Unlawful eviction" it was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) was given an eviction notice for non-compliance of house rules, but was not provided supporting facts of these concerns. Records reviewed indicated R1 was provided with a written eviction notice on 12/30/2024, which did not contain specific required facts including dates, places, witnessess and circumstances related to non-compliance of house rules. Licensee was interviewed and reported the supporting information was not provided to R1 in the eviction notice. Consultation of eviction regulations was provided to Licensee. Licensee has now expressed understandingthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 31, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250115150201
Jul 31, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 18, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Smith Road Assisted Living licensed?
Yes — Smith Road Assisted Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Hemet (Riverside County): California license #331881421, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 12 residents. State records list 24 inspection and complaint documents since 2023; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 22, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.
Can Smith Road Assisted Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Smith Road Assisted Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 12 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 7 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 5
How much does Smith Road Assisted Living cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Smith Road Assisted Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Riverside County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Smith Road Assisted Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Smith Road Assisted Living is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.
Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
8 of 12 beds occupied (67%) when the state visited on December 17, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Smith Road Assisted Living?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 31 state visits and 24 dated documents since 2023 for Smith Road Assisted Living; 16 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 17, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2025
2023
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 31 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for mid-size homes (7–15 beds), computed across all 307 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(951) 927-8178Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Smith Road Assisted Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.