Sun City Gardens is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sun City, Riverside County, California — state license #331881358, licensed for 74 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 25 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated May 21, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

4 homes in view

Sun City Gardens

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 74 residents · Sun City, CA · Riverside County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #331881358, held since 2023 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
28500 Bradley Road · Sun City, Riverside County
Phone
(951) 679-2391
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 68 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 17 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 68 NON-AMBULATORY AND 6 AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 17.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 31 times and filed 25 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 21, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 16, 2026
Occupancy at the March 24, 2026 visit
38 of 74 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 19 documents with transcribed findings, dated May 4, 2023 to March 24, 2026. 19 of the 19 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (6), “Unfounded” (7), “Unsubstantiated” (6). 19 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 19 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 22 of 25 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
May 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff overmedicated resident resulting in hospitalization

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Seo Jeon conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings of the above allegation. LPA met with Barbara Guzman, Business Office Manager. The Department’s investigation involved interviews with staff, relevant parties and residents and reviews of records. On 05-08-2025, Community Care Licensing (The Department) received a complaint report with the following allegation. It was alleged that facility staff overmedicated resident resulting in hospitalization. Information received indicated that Resident #1 (R1) was observed to be unresponsive and overmedicated on 04-27-2025. R1 was transferred to a hospital and was admitted for a left femur fracture on the same day. The Department’s record review revealed that R1 had been under hospice care and was receiving routine pain medication along with as needed (PRN) pain medication of a different type. Continued on LIC9099-C.... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 24, 2026 · control 18-AS-20250508145059
Feb 11, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202510 state visits · 12 documents
Nov 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff locked residents in their rooms. Facility is in disrepair

The reason for the subsequent visit it to make a correction on the citation and provide additional information not included on the report dated 5/17/25, all other findings remain the same. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Brenda Sanchez and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 11:00 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 11:20 AM and interviewed staff and resident between 11:30:00 AM to 2:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff locked residents in their rooms, it was alleged that residents' Memory Care doors were locked from the outside. LPA's physical plant tour today revealed that residents' door at Memory care were locked from the outside even when the resident is inside the room. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 8, 2025 · control 18-AS-20231024121610
Jun 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not answer residents' call buttons in a timely manner Staff do not ensure that residents' showering needs are met Staff do not ensure that residents are provided laundry service

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Resident Services Director (RSD) Brenda Sanchez and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:02 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:43 AM, reviewed documents between 9:45 AM to 11:30 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:30 AM to 1:30 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff do not answer residents' call buttons in a timely manner, it was alleged that residents are not having their call buttons answered for extended periods of time. LPA Shaw Ross' interview with three (3) residents on 05/28/24 and LPA's interview today with seven (7) residents or more than 10% of current census revealed that five (5) out of ten (10) residents interviewed stated that staff comes more than an hour after pressing their call button. Three (3) residents interviewethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 7, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240521162029
May 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide resident with modified diet as prescribed. Staff did not ensure resident’s room was adequately cleaned. Staff did not assist resident with personal hygiene care. Staff did not dispense resident’s medication as prescribed. Staff did not refill resident's medication in a timely manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Brenda Sanchez and explained reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 8:55 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:38 AM, reviewed records between 10:00 AM to 11:30 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:30 AM to 1:30 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff did not provide resident with modified diet as prescribed, it was alleged that staff not making sure thickened water is available for Resident #1 (R1) to drink because R1 was having trouble swallowing. LPA's record review today revealed that R1 was admitted on 11/22/22 had trouble swallowing and was prescribed to be given honey thick liquid on 01/09/24 by the Hospice Doctor. LPA's interview with two (2) Memory Care staff today who were here when R1 was still at the facility revealed that when they were taking cathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 18, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240819145843
May 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is retaining a resident that requires a higher level of care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Brenda Sanchez and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 8:38 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:05 AM, reviewed records between 9:15 AM to 10:00 AM and interviewed staff and resident between 10:00 AM to 10:35 AM. Regarding the allegation that Resident #1 (R1) was not capable of making medical and financial decisions independently and R1's memory is declining rapidly. LPA's record review revealed that R1 was admitted at the facility on 11/15/22, declared self-responsible and did not list any family member on record. Further review also revealed that upon admission, R1 had the capacity for self-care and able to do own Activity of Daily Living (ADL)'s aside from minimal assistance on bathing. On 08/04/23, R1 had medication payment issues that the Adult Prothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 17, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230814190432
May 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff locked residents in their rooms. Facility is in disrepair

This report is being amended to rectify typographical error. No change in findings. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Brenda Sanchez and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 11:00 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 11:20 AM and interviewed staff and resident between 11:30:00 AM to 2:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff locked residents in their rooms, it was alleged that residents' Memory Care doors were locked from the outside. LPA's physical plant tour today revealed that residents' door at Memory care were locked from the outside even when the resident is inside the room. Regarding the allegation that Facility is in disrepair, it was alleged that Door at Memory Care in Bldg. 200 was broken and wide open 24/7. LPA Goodrich's physical plant tour on 10/31/23 revealed that the door wthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 17, 2025 · control 18-AS-20231024121610
Apr 30, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained unexplained injuries while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Seo Jeon conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings of the above allegation. LPA met with Georgianna Mendez, Executive Director, who was informed of today's visit. The Department investigation involved interviews with staff and review of records. It was alleged resident sustained unexplained injuries while in care. According to records reviewed by LPA and interviews conducted with staff, it was determined that Resident #1 (R1) was a non-verbal, bedridden and receiving hospice care since 2021. R1 required a two-person assist due to their frail condition. Two (2) current staff members who provided care to R1 during R1’s residency at the facility were interviewed as part of the investigation. Both staff members confirmed that R1’s bedridden condition required a 2-person assist and stated that caregivers at the facility underwent specialized training (repositioning and feeding position) provided by the hospice agency for every residenthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240325081849
Apr 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Due to neglect, a resident sustained pressure injuries while in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Seo Jeon conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings of the above allegation. LPA met with Georgianna Mendez, Executive Director, and informed them the purpose of LPA's visit. The Department investigation involved interviews with staff and review of records. It was alleged that due to neglect, a resident sustained pressure injuries while in care. LPA’s records review revealed the following for Resident #1 (R1). R1 had been admitted to Sun City Gardens on June 10, 2023, and resided there until December 10, 2023. A physician’s report dated July 10, 2023, stated R1 was non-ambulatory and noted a history of skin conditions or skin breakdowns, no further details about R1's skin condition were provided. Facility records included R1’s narrative charting from June 27, 2023, to February 13, 2024. Upon review, LPA found no documentation indicating R1 had sustained pressure injuries. Continued on LIC9099-C.... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240213115944
Apr 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff failed to keep facility free of pests (nats, bed bugs, maggots).

Licensing Program Analsyt (LPA) Alberto Lopez made an unannounced visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Business Manager Barbara Guzman and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of obtaining and reviewing staff and resident rosters, interviewing six (6) staff and eight (8) residents, taking a tour of resident rooms and common areas, Invoice from Orkin Pest control dated 03/26/2025. LPA also obtained and reviewed Orkin Service Reports dated 10/28/2024, 11/01/2024, 11/06/2024, 11/14/2024, 12/04/2024, 12/06/2024, 12/18/2024, 01/17/2025, 01/22/2025, 01/24/2025, 01/29/2025, 02/6/2025, 02/06/2025. The investigation revealed. Allegation: Facility staff failed to keep facility free of pests (nats, bed bugs, maggots). It is alleged that there is an infestation of bedbugs, maggots and nats in some rooms at facility and that facility failed to keep rooms free of pest. (continued on 9099C) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 12, 2025 · control 18-AS-20241113130413
Feb 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not timely replace a light bulb in a resident's room

Licensing Program Analyst, (LPA) Yolanda Delgado arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude an investigation pertaining to the allegation listed above. LPA met with Executive Director Joey Collado and Business Office Manager Barbara Guzman and explained the purpose of the visit. On February 1, 2024, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging staff did not replace a light bulb in Resident #1’s bedroom due to an outage and that R1 could not see to get to the restroom. LPA conducted an interview with Administrator which revealed that when services request is presented, maintenance fixes as soon as possible. Administrator also stated that there was no request for a light bulb replacement. Information obtained from interviews with maintenance and housekeeping staff revealed that resident’s room has two lamps with working lightbulbs and the hallway light illuminates the pathway leading to the resident’s restroom from the bathroom. LPA conducted an Interview with an additionathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 19, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240201095941
Jan 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Wrongful Eviction Staff are retaliating against resident for complaining

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Yolanda Delgado made an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate a complaint regarding the allegations listed above. LPA met with Executive Director, Jose (Joey) Collado, Barbara Guzman, Business Office Director and explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. LPA Delgado conducted the investigation which consisted of interview with staff members, Resident (R#1) and record review. On January 10, 2025, Community Care Licensing received a complaint stating wrongful eviction and staff are retaliating against resident for complaining. The allegation stated that the resident received a 3-day eviction notice from the facility and the facility is trying to get the resident out due to resident making numerous complaints against the facility. During the LPA’s investigation it revealed that R#1 does not reside in the Assisted Living and does not reside in the Memory Care at the facility. LPA confirmed with R#1 and staff that R#1the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 16, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250110170006
Jan 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20247 state visits · 7 documents
Oct 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not provide adequate supervision to resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced visit to the facility to commence a complaint investigation in regards to the allegation noted above. LPA met with Administrator Diane Domingo where LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the complaint allegation. The allegation was investigated, the investigation consisted of observations, interviews and records review. On 10/14/24 Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging facility staff did not provide adequate supervision to resident in care. It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) had eloped multiple times inside the facility and into another building, and had eloped from the facility and was found on the freeway. Additionally, it was alleged that R1 was able to elope due to there not being a security guard on the premises during the night time/NOC hours (10pm-7am). Per an interview with Administrator Diane the incident did in fact occur with R1 eloping and being found on the freeway andthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 21, 2024 · control 18-AS-20241014123647
Aug 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not dispense medications as prescribed

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude the investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Executive Director Diana Domingo and Resident Service Director Bituin Garcia and explained the purpose of the visit. Complaint investigation consisted of a tour of the interior/exterior areas of the facility, interviews, and records review of requested pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation “Facility staff did not dispense medications as prescribed” it was reported Resident One (R1) has not been receiving their medication for months. Interview with Staff One (S1) revealed the facility received a new medication order for R1 that had a change of dosage from 500mg to 200mg and staff had requested clarification of correct dosage for R1’s medication on 06/29/2023. Staff received a medication list from R1’s physician dated 08/28/2023 with R1’s medication with a dosage of 200mg and orders to take orally twice a day. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 29, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240515150339
Jul 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Due to neglect, resident sustained pressure injuries/bruises

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced visit to the facility to commence a complaint investigation in regards to the allegation noted above. LPA met with Executive Director Elizabeth "Diane" Domingo and explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. On 7/11/24 Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging due to neglect, resident sustained pressure injuries/bruises. Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on 7/7/24, upon admission the Resident Services Director Bituin Garcia was conducting a physical assessment and observed R1 to have "weeping" (fluid leaking from their legs) and multiple wounds. R1 was observed to have wounds on both their upper and lower extremities, as well as bruising to upper and lower extremities, and their head drooping to the left side. At approximately 3:31pm emergency medical services was contacted and transported R1 to the hospital due to the condition upon admission. Per an interview with Resthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 17, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240711084938
May 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure resident's room was free of rodents Staff are not providing a healthful environment for resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez made an unannounced visit to initiate the investigation regarding the allegation(s) listed above. LPA was granted entry and met with Executive Director Diane Domingo and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted a tour of the interior/exterior areas of the facility, conducted interviews, and requested copies of pertinent documentation. Interview with Executive Director Domingo revealed Resident One (R1) lives in the independent living units at the facility. Record review of the facility's assisted living and memory care resident roster confirmed R1 lives in the facility's independent living units which is not licensed by the Department and Community Care Licensing (CCL) does not have jurisdiction over the independent living units of the facility. Therefore the allegation(s) listed above has been deemed UNFOUNDED at this time. A finding that the complaint is unfounded means the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or isthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240423144356
Apr 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek medical attention for resident. Resident was exposed to hazardous gas while in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Jacqueline Shaw Ross made an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the allegations noted above. LPA met with Barbara Guzman, Business Office Manager and explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. The investigation consisted of observations, interviews, and records review. On 2/26/2024, Community Care Licensing received an complaint alleging staff did not seek medical attention for a resident, and that resident was exposed to hazardous gas while in care. The LPA conducted a tour of the interior/exterior areas of the facility, conducted a review of records, obtained, and requested copies of pertinent documentation. LPA was provided with the roster for the facility. A review of the resident roster and face sheet indicted that the resident lives in the independent living section of the facility and that CCLD does not have jurisdiction over the independent living units of the facility. Therefore, this complaint is unfounded.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240226164235
Feb 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations6typical 1
Type B citations3typical 1
Substantiated complaints10typical 2
Total complaints19typical 7
State visits on file31typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2023.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026330202510124202477120233312022110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Riverside County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (951) 679-2391

Is Sun City Gardens licensed?

Yes — Sun City Gardens is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sun City (Riverside County): California license #331881358, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 74 residents. State records list 25 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated May 21, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Sun City Gardens care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Sun City Gardens with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 68 NON-AMBULATORY AND 6 AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 17.

How much does Sun City Gardens cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Sun City Gardens's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Riverside County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Sun City Gardens accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Sun City Gardens is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

38 of 74 beds occupied (51%) when the state visited on March 24, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Sun City Gardens?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 31 state visits and 25 dated documents since 2022 for Sun City Gardens; 19 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 24, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

19 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff overmedicated resident resulting in hospitalization
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Seo Jeon conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings of the above allegation. LPA met with Barbara Guzman, Business Office Manager. The Department’s investigation involved interviews with staff, relevant parties and residents and reviews of records. On 05-08-2025, Community Care Licensing (The Department) received a complaint report with the following allegation. It was alleged that facility staff overmedicated resident resulting in hospitalization. Information received indicated that Resident #1 (R1) was observed to be unresponsive and overmedicated on 04-27-2025. R1 was transferred to a hospital and was admitted for a left femur fracture on the same day. The Department’s record review revealed that R1 had been under hospice care and was receiving routine pain medication along with as needed (PRN) pain medication of a different type. Continued on LIC9099-C.... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 24, 2026 · control 18-AS-20250508145059

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff locked residents in their rooms. Facility is in disrepair
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
The reason for the subsequent visit it to make a correction on the citation and provide additional information not included on the report dated 5/17/25, all other findings remain the same. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Brenda Sanchez and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 11:00 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 11:20 AM and interviewed staff and resident between 11:30:00 AM to 2:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff locked residents in their rooms, it was alleged that residents' Memory Care doors were locked from the outside. LPA's physical plant tour today revealed that residents' door at Memory care were locked from the outside even when the resident is inside the room. (continued on LIC 9099-C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 8, 2025 · control 18-AS-20231024121610
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not answer residents' call buttons in a timely manner Staff do not ensure that residents' showering needs are met Staff do not ensure that residents are provided laundry service
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Resident Services Director (RSD) Brenda Sanchez and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:02 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:43 AM, reviewed documents between 9:45 AM to 11:30 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:30 AM to 1:30 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff do not answer residents' call buttons in a timely manner, it was alleged that residents are not having their call buttons answered for extended periods of time. LPA Shaw Ross' interview with three (3) residents on 05/28/24 and LPA's interview today with seven (7) residents or more than 10% of current census revealed that five (5) out of ten (10) residents interviewed stated that staff comes more than an hour after pressing their call button. Three (3) residents intervieweCDSS inspection report, June 7, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240521162029
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide resident with modified diet as prescribed. Staff did not ensure resident’s room was adequately cleaned. Staff did not assist resident with personal hygiene care. Staff did not dispense resident’s medication as prescribed. Staff did not refill resident's medication in a timely manner.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Brenda Sanchez and explained reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 8:55 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:38 AM, reviewed records between 10:00 AM to 11:30 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:30 AM to 1:30 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff did not provide resident with modified diet as prescribed, it was alleged that staff not making sure thickened water is available for Resident #1 (R1) to drink because R1 was having trouble swallowing. LPA's record review today revealed that R1 was admitted on 11/22/22 had trouble swallowing and was prescribed to be given honey thick liquid on 01/09/24 by the Hospice Doctor. LPA's interview with two (2) Memory Care staff today who were here when R1 was still at the facility revealed that when they were taking caCDSS inspection report, May 18, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240819145843
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is retaining a resident that requires a higher level of care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Brenda Sanchez and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 8:38 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:05 AM, reviewed records between 9:15 AM to 10:00 AM and interviewed staff and resident between 10:00 AM to 10:35 AM. Regarding the allegation that Resident #1 (R1) was not capable of making medical and financial decisions independently and R1's memory is declining rapidly. LPA's record review revealed that R1 was admitted at the facility on 11/15/22, declared self-responsible and did not list any family member on record. Further review also revealed that upon admission, R1 had the capacity for self-care and able to do own Activity of Daily Living (ADL)'s aside from minimal assistance on bathing. On 08/04/23, R1 had medication payment issues that the Adult ProCDSS inspection report, May 17, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230814190432
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff locked residents in their rooms. Facility is in disrepair
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
This report is being amended to rectify typographical error. No change in findings. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Brenda Sanchez and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 11:00 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 11:20 AM and interviewed staff and resident between 11:30:00 AM to 2:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff locked residents in their rooms, it was alleged that residents' Memory Care doors were locked from the outside. LPA's physical plant tour today revealed that residents' door at Memory care were locked from the outside even when the resident is inside the room. Regarding the allegation that Facility is in disrepair, it was alleged that Door at Memory Care in Bldg. 200 was broken and wide open 24/7. LPA Goodrich's physical plant tour on 10/31/23 revealed that the door wCDSS inspection report, May 17, 2025 · control 18-AS-20231024121610
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained unexplained injuries while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Seo Jeon conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings of the above allegation. LPA met with Georgianna Mendez, Executive Director, who was informed of today's visit. The Department investigation involved interviews with staff and review of records. It was alleged resident sustained unexplained injuries while in care. According to records reviewed by LPA and interviews conducted with staff, it was determined that Resident #1 (R1) was a non-verbal, bedridden and receiving hospice care since 2021. R1 required a two-person assist due to their frail condition. Two (2) current staff members who provided care to R1 during R1’s residency at the facility were interviewed as part of the investigation. Both staff members confirmed that R1’s bedridden condition required a 2-person assist and stated that caregivers at the facility underwent specialized training (repositioning and feeding position) provided by the hospice agency for every residenCDSS inspection report, April 29, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240325081849
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedDue to neglect, a resident sustained pressure injuries while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Seo Jeon conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings of the above allegation. LPA met with Georgianna Mendez, Executive Director, and informed them the purpose of LPA's visit. The Department investigation involved interviews with staff and review of records. It was alleged that due to neglect, a resident sustained pressure injuries while in care. LPA’s records review revealed the following for Resident #1 (R1). R1 had been admitted to Sun City Gardens on June 10, 2023, and resided there until December 10, 2023. A physician’s report dated July 10, 2023, stated R1 was non-ambulatory and noted a history of skin conditions or skin breakdowns, no further details about R1's skin condition were provided. Facility records included R1’s narrative charting from June 27, 2023, to February 13, 2024. Upon review, LPA found no documentation indicating R1 had sustained pressure injuries. Continued on LIC9099-C.... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 24, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240213115944
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff failed to keep facility free of pests (nats, bed bugs, maggots).
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analsyt (LPA) Alberto Lopez made an unannounced visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Business Manager Barbara Guzman and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of obtaining and reviewing staff and resident rosters, interviewing six (6) staff and eight (8) residents, taking a tour of resident rooms and common areas, Invoice from Orkin Pest control dated 03/26/2025. LPA also obtained and reviewed Orkin Service Reports dated 10/28/2024, 11/01/2024, 11/06/2024, 11/14/2024, 12/04/2024, 12/06/2024, 12/18/2024, 01/17/2025, 01/22/2025, 01/24/2025, 01/29/2025, 02/6/2025, 02/06/2025. The investigation revealed. Allegation: Facility staff failed to keep facility free of pests (nats, bed bugs, maggots). It is alleged that there is an infestation of bedbugs, maggots and nats in some rooms at facility and that facility failed to keep rooms free of pest. (continued on 9099C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 12, 2025 · control 18-AS-20241113130413
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not timely replace a light bulb in a resident's room
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst, (LPA) Yolanda Delgado arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude an investigation pertaining to the allegation listed above. LPA met with Executive Director Joey Collado and Business Office Manager Barbara Guzman and explained the purpose of the visit. On February 1, 2024, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging staff did not replace a light bulb in Resident #1’s bedroom due to an outage and that R1 could not see to get to the restroom. LPA conducted an interview with Administrator which revealed that when services request is presented, maintenance fixes as soon as possible. Administrator also stated that there was no request for a light bulb replacement. Information obtained from interviews with maintenance and housekeeping staff revealed that resident’s room has two lamps with working lightbulbs and the hallway light illuminates the pathway leading to the resident’s restroom from the bathroom. LPA conducted an Interview with an additionaCDSS inspection report, February 19, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240201095941
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedWrongful Eviction Staff are retaliating against resident for complaining
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Yolanda Delgado made an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate a complaint regarding the allegations listed above. LPA met with Executive Director, Jose (Joey) Collado, Barbara Guzman, Business Office Director and explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. LPA Delgado conducted the investigation which consisted of interview with staff members, Resident (R#1) and record review. On January 10, 2025, Community Care Licensing received a complaint stating wrongful eviction and staff are retaliating against resident for complaining. The allegation stated that the resident received a 3-day eviction notice from the facility and the facility is trying to get the resident out due to resident making numerous complaints against the facility. During the LPA’s investigation it revealed that R#1 does not reside in the Assisted Living and does not reside in the Memory Care at the facility. LPA confirmed with R#1 and staff that R#1CDSS inspection report, January 16, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250110170006

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not provide adequate supervision to resident in care.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced visit to the facility to commence a complaint investigation in regards to the allegation noted above. LPA met with Administrator Diane Domingo where LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the complaint allegation. The allegation was investigated, the investigation consisted of observations, interviews and records review. On 10/14/24 Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging facility staff did not provide adequate supervision to resident in care. It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) had eloped multiple times inside the facility and into another building, and had eloped from the facility and was found on the freeway. Additionally, it was alleged that R1 was able to elope due to there not being a security guard on the premises during the night time/NOC hours (10pm-7am). Per an interview with Administrator Diane the incident did in fact occur with R1 eloping and being found on the freeway andCDSS inspection report, October 21, 2024 · control 18-AS-20241014123647
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not dispense medications as prescribed
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude the investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Executive Director Diana Domingo and Resident Service Director Bituin Garcia and explained the purpose of the visit. Complaint investigation consisted of a tour of the interior/exterior areas of the facility, interviews, and records review of requested pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation “Facility staff did not dispense medications as prescribed” it was reported Resident One (R1) has not been receiving their medication for months. Interview with Staff One (S1) revealed the facility received a new medication order for R1 that had a change of dosage from 500mg to 200mg and staff had requested clarification of correct dosage for R1’s medication on 06/29/2023. Staff received a medication list from R1’s physician dated 08/28/2023 with R1’s medication with a dosage of 200mg and orders to take orally twice a day. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 29, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240515150339
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedDue to neglect, resident sustained pressure injuries/bruises
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced visit to the facility to commence a complaint investigation in regards to the allegation noted above. LPA met with Executive Director Elizabeth "Diane" Domingo and explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. On 7/11/24 Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging due to neglect, resident sustained pressure injuries/bruises. Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on 7/7/24, upon admission the Resident Services Director Bituin Garcia was conducting a physical assessment and observed R1 to have "weeping" (fluid leaking from their legs) and multiple wounds. R1 was observed to have wounds on both their upper and lower extremities, as well as bruising to upper and lower extremities, and their head drooping to the left side. At approximately 3:31pm emergency medical services was contacted and transported R1 to the hospital due to the condition upon admission. Per an interview with ResCDSS inspection report, July 17, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240711084938
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure resident's room was free of rodents Staff are not providing a healthful environment for resident
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez made an unannounced visit to initiate the investigation regarding the allegation(s) listed above. LPA was granted entry and met with Executive Director Diane Domingo and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted a tour of the interior/exterior areas of the facility, conducted interviews, and requested copies of pertinent documentation. Interview with Executive Director Domingo revealed Resident One (R1) lives in the independent living units at the facility. Record review of the facility's assisted living and memory care resident roster confirmed R1 lives in the facility's independent living units which is not licensed by the Department and Community Care Licensing (CCL) does not have jurisdiction over the independent living units of the facility. Therefore the allegation(s) listed above has been deemed UNFOUNDED at this time. A finding that the complaint is unfounded means the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or isCDSS inspection report, May 1, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240423144356
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not seek medical attention for resident. Resident was exposed to hazardous gas while in care.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Jacqueline Shaw Ross made an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the allegations noted above. LPA met with Barbara Guzman, Business Office Manager and explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. The investigation consisted of observations, interviews, and records review. On 2/26/2024, Community Care Licensing received an complaint alleging staff did not seek medical attention for a resident, and that resident was exposed to hazardous gas while in care. The LPA conducted a tour of the interior/exterior areas of the facility, conducted a review of records, obtained, and requested copies of pertinent documentation. LPA was provided with the roster for the facility. A review of the resident roster and face sheet indicted that the resident lives in the independent living section of the facility and that CCLD does not have jurisdiction over the independent living units of the facility. Therefore, this complaint is unfounded.CDSS inspection report, April 15, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240226164235

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 31 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
6
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
10
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
19
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
31
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(951) 679-2391
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Sun City Gardens? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.