Manzanita Village At Rancho Belago is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California — state license #331881349, licensed for 150 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 29 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2023, the most recent dated February 10, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

6 homes in view

Manzanita Village At Rancho Belago

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 150 residents · Moreno Valley, CA · Riverside County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #331881349, held since 2023 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
27900 Brodiaea Avenue · Moreno Valley, Riverside County
Phone
(951) 379-0100
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 125 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 12 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF 125 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 12 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN; APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20 RESIDENTS.State service designations935 - ELDERLY · 983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2023, the state has visited this home 37 times and filed 29 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated February 10, 2026.

Most recent state visit
March 12, 2026
Occupancy at the December 17, 2025 visit
124 of 125 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 11 documents with transcribed findings, dated April 18, 2023 to December 17, 2025. 11 of the 11 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (9). 11 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 11 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 28 of 29 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 4 documents
Feb 10, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 30, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 30, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202515 state visits · 18 documents
Dec 30, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is not staffed to meet residents needs Staff are not adhering to hygiene measures with resident's food Facility does not have a menu

On December 17, 2025, the Department of Social Services staff conducted an unannounced visit to this facility to continue investigation of the above allegations and to deliver findings. The Department was met by Brook Abrego-Huerta Administrator and the purpose of the visit was explained. Investigation consisted of the following: On May 1, 2024, the Department conducted an unannounced initial visit to the facility to investigate the complaint allegations mentioned above. During the visit, it was determined that the complaint required further investigation. On December 16, 2025, the Department requested and obtain the following documents: Staff schedule (dated: December 2025, May 2024), client roster (dated 12/16/25) Riverside County food handlers certificates for staff with the following expiration dates: 12/3/27, 11/18/27, 11/26/27, 11/6/27), Facility Menu (dated 12/14-12/20/2025). The Department conduct interviews with Administrator (A1), 5 staff (S1-S5), 4 residents (R1-R4). On Decethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 17, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240422101017
Dec 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not properly supervising a resident who is a fall risk

On December 17, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson arrived unannounced at the facility and met with the Licensee, Brooke Huerta. LPA explained the reason for the visit was to provide findings for the complaint investigation. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, record reviews, and made observations pertaining to the listed allegation. On July 22, 2025, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging staff are not properly supervising a resident who is fall risk. It was reported that Resident #1 (R1) is not being properly supervised because on July 21, 2025, the First Responders/ Emergency Services were called out twice within three hours on the same day. R1 had an unwitnessed fall, but there were no observable injuries and they did not complain of any pain. Information obtained from interview with Administrator; Brooke Huerta, indicated the facility staff are providing adequate supervision. Furthermore, Administrator specified that staff followedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 17, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250722121432
Dec 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not able to meet the needs of residents in care due to staff shortage.

On December 16, 2025, the Department of Social Services staff conducted an unannounced visit to this facility to continue investigation of the above allegations and to deliver findings. The Department was met by Brook Abrego-Huerta Administrator and the purpose of the visit was explained. Investigation consisted of the following: On August 26, 2025, the Department conducted an unannounced initial visit to the facility to investigate the complaint allegations mentioned above. During the visit, it was determined that the complaint required further investigation. On December 16, 2025, the Department requested and obtain the following documents: Staff schedule (dated: December 2025, May 2024), client roster (dated 12/16/25) Riverside county food handlers certificates for staff with the following expiration dates: 12/3/27, 11/18/27, 11/26/27, 11/6/27), Facility Menu (dated 12/14-12/20/2025). the Department conduct interviews with Administrator (A1), 5 staff (S1-S5) 4 residents (R1-R4) Pagethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240507160515
Dec 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident billing statement does not clearly state charges. Staff are not providing services agreed upon in the resident's Admission Agreement.

On 10/28/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted a subsequent visit to gather information and deliver findings regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Anna Martinez, Assistant Executive Director, and the purpose of the visit was explained. LPA was granted entry to the facility. The investigation included the following: On 10/27/2025, LPA Richard reviewed and obtained the Residents' Roster (dated 07/11/2025), the Staff Roster (dated 06/25/2025), the Admission Agreement for Resident #1 (R1), the billing statement for R1 (dated 05/28/2024), the Medication Administration Record (MAR) (dated October 2025) for residents #2-6, and the Physician Report for residents #2-6. LPA interviewed the Assistant Executive Director (AED), Med Tech (MT), the Dining Services Manager (DSM), two staff members (S1-S2), and five residents (R2-R6). The facility's weekly menu and the optional menu (dated October 26 through November 1, 2025) were also reviewed. A copy of the beauticithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 28, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230411113844
Oct 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not providing medications as prescribed to resident (s) in care. Facility staff are dispensing medications in care without a prescription. Facility did not provide proper notification to authorized representative for fee increase.

On 10/28/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted a subsequent visit to gather information and deliver findings regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Anna Martinez, Assistant Executive Director, and the purpose of the visit was explained. LPA was granted entry to the facility. The investigation included the following: On 10/27/2025, LPA Richard reviewed and obtained the Residents' Roster (dated 07/11/2025), the Staff Roster (dated 06/25/2025), the Admission Agreement for Resident #1 (R1), the billing statement for R1 (dated 05/28/2024), the Medication Administration Record (MAR) (dated October 2025) for residents #1-5, and the Physician Report for residents #1-5. LPA interviewed the Assistant Executive Director (AED), Med Tech (MT), the Dining Services Manager (DSM), two staff members (S1-S2), and five residents (R1-R5). The facility's weekly menu and the optional menu (dated October 26 through November 1, 2025) were also reviewed. A copy of the beauticithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 28, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230306145647
Oct 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility has insufficient staffing to meet residents' needs. Staff failed to provide adequate food service.

On 10/27/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted a subsequent visit to gather information and deliver findings regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Anna Martinez, Assistant Executive Director, and the purpose of the visit was explained. LPA was granted entry to the facility. The Investigation consisted of the following: On 10/27/2025, LPA Richard reviewed and obtained the Residents' Roster (dated 07/11/2025), the Staff Roster (dated 06/25/2025), Medication Administration Record (MAR) (dated October 2025) for residents #1-5, and the Physician Report for Residents #1-5. LPA interviewed the Assistant Executive Director (AED), Med Tech (MT), the Dining Services Manager (DSM), two staff members (S1-S2), and five residents (R1-R5). The facility's weekly menu and the optional menu (dated October 26th through November 1st, 2025). Report Continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 27, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230306151448
Oct 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not respond to the resident’s calls for assistance in a timely manner

On 10/21/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Valerie Flores conducted an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of delivering an investigative finding into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Executive Director, Brooke Huerta, and explained to Anna the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and records review. Information received alleged that facility staff did not respond to residents calls for assistance in a timely manner. Records review conducted of the facility’s signaling system logged from April 11, 2023 to April 18, 2023 detailed numerous incidents of residents waiting approximately 20 minutes to 65 minutes until care staff arrived to assist the resident. Interviews conducted with residents divulged that the facility was experiencing a shortage of staff resulting in a delay of when residents would receive assistance. (Continue to LIC9099C...) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 21, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230412124717
Sep 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility did not administer medication as prescribed

THIS DOCUMENT WAS AMENDED On September 11, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson arrived unannounced at the facility and met with the Licensee, Brooke Huerta. LPA explained the reason for the visit was to provide findings for the complaint investigation. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, record reviews, and made observations pertaining to the listed allegation. On April 02, 2025, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging facility staff did not administer medication as prescribed. It was reported that once Resident #1 relocated from the facility, R1 was given 13 unopen boxes of eye drops, causing concern that the medication was not being distributed as described. Information obtained from interview with Licensee, Brooke Huerta, denied the allegation that R1 was not being prescribed their medication. It was reported that the medication was provided in singular doses. Licensee indicated that R1 did not miss any prescriptions, which would be revthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 5, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250402160033
Aug 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff was negligent in resident's death

On 8/19/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Valerie Flores arrived at the facility unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings of the listed allegations. LPA Flores met with Assistant Director, Anna Martinez, and a tour of the facility was conducted. On 4/12/2023, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging facility staff was negligent in resident's death. Information obtained through interviews revealed staff attempted to assist Resident #1 (R1) with showering, while doing so R1 became agitated, R1’s agitation is related to R1s cognitive impairment which became noticeable after a change in R1s medication. This is consistent with Needs/Service Plan-File Review. According to information obtained R1 did not want to shower. Staff would assist R1’s showering needs during the evening for R1 to be presentable at church services, at the request of R1’s Responsible party. R1’s shower schedule would vary depending on R1’s mood. R1’s agitation increased, and staff attemthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 19, 2025 · control 18-AS-20241016142418
May 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20245 state visits · 5 documents
Nov 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Aug 17, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff refused to accept resident back into care following a hospitalization Staff failed to ensure communication from resident's representative was answered promptly

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Stephanie Martinez, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate the above allegations. The LPA met with Brooke Abrego-Huerta, Executive Director (ED), and informed her of the purpose for her visit. The investigation included staff interviews, records review, and records collection. An allegation was received by the Department alleging facility staff were not permitting Resident One (R1) to return to the facility following a planned hospitalization on August 15, 2023. The LPA spoke with Brooke, ED, who reported R1's return to the facility was not denied. Brook reported the facility recommended R1 be transferred to a skilled nursing facility in order for the resident to heal appropriately following their hospitalization. Staff interviews reported a call was received on August 14, 2023 from a representative of the medical center where R1 was hospitalized. It was reported the representative inquired if R1 would be returning to the facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 17, 2023 · control 18-AS-20230815150547
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations1typical 1
Substantiated complaints1typical 2
Total complaints15typical 7
State visits on file37typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2023.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202634020251518120245502023330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Riverside County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (951) 379-0100

Is Manzanita Village At Rancho Belago licensed?

Yes — Manzanita Village At Rancho Belago is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Moreno Valley (Riverside County): California license #331881349, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 150 residents. State records list 29 inspection and complaint documents since 2023; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated February 10, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Manzanita Village At Rancho Belago care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Manzanita Village At Rancho Belago with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF 125 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 12 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN; APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20 RESIDENTS.

How much does Manzanita Village At Rancho Belago cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Manzanita Village At Rancho Belago's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Riverside County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Manzanita Village At Rancho Belago accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Manzanita Village At Rancho Belago through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Riverside County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

124 of 125 beds occupied (99%) when the state visited on December 17, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Manzanita Village At Rancho Belago?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 37 state visits and 29 dated documents since 2023 for Manzanita Village At Rancho Belago; 11 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 17, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

11 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not staffed to meet residents needs Staff are not adhering to hygiene measures with resident's food Facility does not have a menu
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On December 17, 2025, the Department of Social Services staff conducted an unannounced visit to this facility to continue investigation of the above allegations and to deliver findings. The Department was met by Brook Abrego-Huerta Administrator and the purpose of the visit was explained. Investigation consisted of the following: On May 1, 2024, the Department conducted an unannounced initial visit to the facility to investigate the complaint allegations mentioned above. During the visit, it was determined that the complaint required further investigation. On December 16, 2025, the Department requested and obtain the following documents: Staff schedule (dated: December 2025, May 2024), client roster (dated 12/16/25) Riverside County food handlers certificates for staff with the following expiration dates: 12/3/27, 11/18/27, 11/26/27, 11/6/27), Facility Menu (dated 12/14-12/20/2025). The Department conduct interviews with Administrator (A1), 5 staff (S1-S5), 4 residents (R1-R4). On DeceCDSS inspection report, December 17, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240422101017
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not properly supervising a resident who is a fall risk
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On December 17, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson arrived unannounced at the facility and met with the Licensee, Brooke Huerta. LPA explained the reason for the visit was to provide findings for the complaint investigation. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, record reviews, and made observations pertaining to the listed allegation. On July 22, 2025, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging staff are not properly supervising a resident who is fall risk. It was reported that Resident #1 (R1) is not being properly supervised because on July 21, 2025, the First Responders/ Emergency Services were called out twice within three hours on the same day. R1 had an unwitnessed fall, but there were no observable injuries and they did not complain of any pain. Information obtained from interview with Administrator; Brooke Huerta, indicated the facility staff are providing adequate supervision. Furthermore, Administrator specified that staff followedCDSS inspection report, December 17, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250722121432
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not able to meet the needs of residents in care due to staff shortage.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On December 16, 2025, the Department of Social Services staff conducted an unannounced visit to this facility to continue investigation of the above allegations and to deliver findings. The Department was met by Brook Abrego-Huerta Administrator and the purpose of the visit was explained. Investigation consisted of the following: On August 26, 2025, the Department conducted an unannounced initial visit to the facility to investigate the complaint allegations mentioned above. During the visit, it was determined that the complaint required further investigation. On December 16, 2025, the Department requested and obtain the following documents: Staff schedule (dated: December 2025, May 2024), client roster (dated 12/16/25) Riverside county food handlers certificates for staff with the following expiration dates: 12/3/27, 11/18/27, 11/26/27, 11/6/27), Facility Menu (dated 12/14-12/20/2025). the Department conduct interviews with Administrator (A1), 5 staff (S1-S5) 4 residents (R1-R4) PageCDSS inspection report, December 16, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240507160515
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident billing statement does not clearly state charges. Staff are not providing services agreed upon in the resident's Admission Agreement.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/28/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted a subsequent visit to gather information and deliver findings regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Anna Martinez, Assistant Executive Director, and the purpose of the visit was explained. LPA was granted entry to the facility. The investigation included the following: On 10/27/2025, LPA Richard reviewed and obtained the Residents' Roster (dated 07/11/2025), the Staff Roster (dated 06/25/2025), the Admission Agreement for Resident #1 (R1), the billing statement for R1 (dated 05/28/2024), the Medication Administration Record (MAR) (dated October 2025) for residents #2-6, and the Physician Report for residents #2-6. LPA interviewed the Assistant Executive Director (AED), Med Tech (MT), the Dining Services Manager (DSM), two staff members (S1-S2), and five residents (R2-R6). The facility's weekly menu and the optional menu (dated October 26 through November 1, 2025) were also reviewed. A copy of the beauticiCDSS inspection report, October 28, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230411113844
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not providing medications as prescribed to resident (s) in care. Facility staff are dispensing medications in care without a prescription. Facility did not provide proper notification to authorized representative for fee increase.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/28/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted a subsequent visit to gather information and deliver findings regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Anna Martinez, Assistant Executive Director, and the purpose of the visit was explained. LPA was granted entry to the facility. The investigation included the following: On 10/27/2025, LPA Richard reviewed and obtained the Residents' Roster (dated 07/11/2025), the Staff Roster (dated 06/25/2025), the Admission Agreement for Resident #1 (R1), the billing statement for R1 (dated 05/28/2024), the Medication Administration Record (MAR) (dated October 2025) for residents #1-5, and the Physician Report for residents #1-5. LPA interviewed the Assistant Executive Director (AED), Med Tech (MT), the Dining Services Manager (DSM), two staff members (S1-S2), and five residents (R1-R5). The facility's weekly menu and the optional menu (dated October 26 through November 1, 2025) were also reviewed. A copy of the beauticiCDSS inspection report, October 28, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230306145647
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has insufficient staffing to meet residents' needs. Staff failed to provide adequate food service.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/27/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted a subsequent visit to gather information and deliver findings regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Anna Martinez, Assistant Executive Director, and the purpose of the visit was explained. LPA was granted entry to the facility. The Investigation consisted of the following: On 10/27/2025, LPA Richard reviewed and obtained the Residents' Roster (dated 07/11/2025), the Staff Roster (dated 06/25/2025), Medication Administration Record (MAR) (dated October 2025) for residents #1-5, and the Physician Report for Residents #1-5. LPA interviewed the Assistant Executive Director (AED), Med Tech (MT), the Dining Services Manager (DSM), two staff members (S1-S2), and five residents (R1-R5). The facility's weekly menu and the optional menu (dated October 26th through November 1st, 2025). Report Continued on LIC9099C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 27, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230306151448
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not respond to the resident’s calls for assistance in a timely manner
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 10/21/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Valerie Flores conducted an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of delivering an investigative finding into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Executive Director, Brooke Huerta, and explained to Anna the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and records review. Information received alleged that facility staff did not respond to residents calls for assistance in a timely manner. Records review conducted of the facility’s signaling system logged from April 11, 2023 to April 18, 2023 detailed numerous incidents of residents waiting approximately 20 minutes to 65 minutes until care staff arrived to assist the resident. Interviews conducted with residents divulged that the facility was experiencing a shortage of staff resulting in a delay of when residents would receive assistance. (Continue to LIC9099C...) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 21, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230412124717
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not administer medication as prescribed
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
THIS DOCUMENT WAS AMENDED On September 11, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson arrived unannounced at the facility and met with the Licensee, Brooke Huerta. LPA explained the reason for the visit was to provide findings for the complaint investigation. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, record reviews, and made observations pertaining to the listed allegation. On April 02, 2025, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging facility staff did not administer medication as prescribed. It was reported that once Resident #1 relocated from the facility, R1 was given 13 unopen boxes of eye drops, causing concern that the medication was not being distributed as described. Information obtained from interview with Licensee, Brooke Huerta, denied the allegation that R1 was not being prescribed their medication. It was reported that the medication was provided in singular doses. Licensee indicated that R1 did not miss any prescriptions, which would be revCDSS inspection report, September 5, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250402160033
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff was negligent in resident's death
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 8/19/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Valerie Flores arrived at the facility unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings of the listed allegations. LPA Flores met with Assistant Director, Anna Martinez, and a tour of the facility was conducted. On 4/12/2023, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging facility staff was negligent in resident's death. Information obtained through interviews revealed staff attempted to assist Resident #1 (R1) with showering, while doing so R1 became agitated, R1’s agitation is related to R1s cognitive impairment which became noticeable after a change in R1s medication. This is consistent with Needs/Service Plan-File Review. According to information obtained R1 did not want to shower. Staff would assist R1’s showering needs during the evening for R1 to be presentable at church services, at the request of R1’s Responsible party. R1’s shower schedule would vary depending on R1’s mood. R1’s agitation increased, and staff attemCDSS inspection report, August 19, 2025 · control 18-AS-20241016142418

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff refused to accept resident back into care following a hospitalization Staff failed to ensure communication from resident's representative was answered promptly
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Stephanie Martinez, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate the above allegations. The LPA met with Brooke Abrego-Huerta, Executive Director (ED), and informed her of the purpose for her visit. The investigation included staff interviews, records review, and records collection. An allegation was received by the Department alleging facility staff were not permitting Resident One (R1) to return to the facility following a planned hospitalization on August 15, 2023. The LPA spoke with Brooke, ED, who reported R1's return to the facility was not denied. Brook reported the facility recommended R1 be transferred to a skilled nursing facility in order for the resident to heal appropriately following their hospitalization. Staff interviews reported a call was received on August 14, 2023 from a representative of the medical center where R1 was hospitalized. It was reported the representative inquired if R1 would be returning to the facilityCDSS inspection report, August 17, 2023 · control 18-AS-20230815150547
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff prohibiting resident from having PRN medication at the facility
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs), Stephanie Torres and Cheryl Goodrich, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to start the investigation into the above allegation. The LPAs met with Business Office Manager, Lucia Gutierrez, and informed her of the purpose of the visit. The LPA conducted staff/resident interviews, reviewed records, and took copies of relevant documentation. Regarding the allegation, "Staff prohibiting resident from having PRN medication at the facility," it was alleged facility staff required an agency, who was contracted to provide healthcare services to Resident One (R1), to discontinue PRN (Pro Re Nata) medications. Interviews revealed R1 is contracted to receive services from an outside agency. Interviews revealed the facility did request the outside agency of R1 to discontinue unused PRN medications that have remained unused for two months. Executive Director (ED), Kameshi Taylor, was interviewed and confirmed the facility did request outside agencies toCDSS inspection report, April 18, 2023 · control 18-AS-20230411113844

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 37 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
15
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
37
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(951) 379-0100
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Manzanita Village At Rancho Belago? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.