Kun Bai Care #2 Home is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California — state license #331880822, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 21 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated April 30, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Kun Bai Care #2 Home

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Lake Elsinore, CA · Riverside County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #331880822, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
4091 Elderberry Ridge · Lake Elsinore, Riverside County
Phone
(909) 994-6199
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 6 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 25 times and filed 21 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on April 30, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”

Most recent state visit
April 30, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
3 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 10 documents with transcribed findings, dated June 23, 2021 to April 30, 2026. 10 of the 10 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (7), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 10 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 10 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 10 of 21 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 2 documents
Apr 30, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is not able to communicate with residents in care.

Regarding the second allegation - Staff is not able to communicate with residents in care: LPA observed S1 was unable to effectively communicate with residents regarding their needs, care, or supervision. LPA attempted to communicate with S1 regarding the allegations mentioned while asking basic questions related to care and supervision. S1 was unable to understand or respond to LPA’s questions in English. LPA made multiple attempts to communicate using simple and direct language; however, S1 was unable to demonstrate an understanding of the questions asked without using a translator application on their cellular device to communicate. S1 telephoned Administrator, Brandon Marquez-Gutierrez (S2), to inform them of LPA's arrival. LPA was informed by S2 that they and Licensee, Sandy Zhao (S3), were unanable to be present at the facility today. LPA's reqeuests had to be translated in Spanish by S2 to S1. Based on investigation, the above allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. A SUBSTANTIATED findingthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 30, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260422082110
Apr 30, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff left resident unattended, covered in urine and blood, for extended periods. Staff did not assist resident in a timely manner. Due to a language barrier, staff can't communicate. Inadequate food service.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with staff Jair Melgarieio Martinez and explained the purpose of the visit. The Administrator Brandon Marquez was also contacted and informed about today’s visit. The investigation consisted of staff interviews, resident interviews and record reviews. For the allegation, Staff left resident unattended, covered in urine and blood, for extended periods. During resident interviews, 4 out of the 4 residents stated they have not been left unattended, covered in urine and blood, for an extended period. During staff interviews, 3 out of the 3 staff stated they have not left their residents unattended, covered in urine and blood for an extend period. LPA Rico conducted a facility tour and did not observe residents covered in urine or blood. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 11, 2025 · control 56-AS-20240624141719
Jun 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20244 state visits · 4 documents
Nov 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that the cleaning supplies were inaccessible to residents. Staff did not ensure that medications were properly stored and locked.

On 07/01/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melody Brown arrived at the facility unannounced to initiate and deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA Brown was greeted and granted entry by Staff #2 (S2) and LPA Brown explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Brandon-Marquez Gutierez was contacted and informed of the vsit. The investigation consisted of observation, interviews and a review of pertinent documentation. The investigation was conducted by LPA Melody Brown. The investigation consisted of observations and interviews with relevant parties. The allegation indicates that Staff did not ensure that the cleaning supplies were inaccessible to residents. LPA Brown obtained evidence to corroborate the allegation above. During the quick tour of the facility on 07/01/2024, LPA Brown observed multiple bottles of cleaning supplies and chemicals under the kitchen sink, not locked and accessible to residents in care. S2 immediately locked the multiple bottles of chemicalsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240624141719
Jun 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident fell due to staff neglect Staff did not check on residents in a timely manner Staff are not ensuring residents are fed Staff left residents soiled for an extended period of time Staff are not ensuring the facility is clean Staff are not ensuring residents have clean towels Staff did not ensure medication was properly stored Staff did not ensure bathroom was not in disrepair Staff inappropriately recorded resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Prieto met with staff Ortiz and allowed entry. Staff Ortiz phoned licensee Sandi Jhao, who was interviewed and explained the elements of the complaint. Because Jhao was not available, she allowed for staff Ortiz to sign off on this report. Regarding the allegation that resident fell due to staff neglect; Staff interviews could not conclude that any resident had fallen due to neglect. The facility is staffed and small enough to notice if someone had fallen. There is no record of residents falling due to neglect. Resident #1 (R1) and R2 are currently residing in the home state that the facility staff treat them well and care for their needs. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 4, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240530093547
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 10, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations10typical 0
Type B citations2typical 0
Substantiated complaints12typical 0
Total complaints8typical 0
State visits on file25typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202612120253302024441202345220223422021331
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,000$5,000 /mo
our estimate — Riverside County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (909) 994-6199

Is Kun Bai Care #2 Home licensed?

Yes — Kun Bai Care #2 Home is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Lake Elsinore (Riverside County): California license #331880822, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 21 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated April 30, 2026, was marked “Substantiated” by the state.

Can Kun Bai Care #2 Home care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Kun Bai Care #2 Home with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.

How much does Kun Bai Care #2 Home cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Kun Bai Care #2 Home's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Riverside County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Kun Bai Care #2 Home accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Kun Bai Care #2 Home is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

3 of 6 beds occupied (50%) when the state visited on April 30, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Kun Bai Care #2 Home?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 25 state visits and 21 dated documents since 2021 for Kun Bai Care #2 Home; 10 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 30, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

10 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is not able to communicate with residents in care.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Regarding the second allegation - Staff is not able to communicate with residents in care: LPA observed S1 was unable to effectively communicate with residents regarding their needs, care, or supervision. LPA attempted to communicate with S1 regarding the allegations mentioned while asking basic questions related to care and supervision. S1 was unable to understand or respond to LPA’s questions in English. LPA made multiple attempts to communicate using simple and direct language; however, S1 was unable to demonstrate an understanding of the questions asked without using a translator application on their cellular device to communicate. S1 telephoned Administrator, Brandon Marquez-Gutierrez (S2), to inform them of LPA's arrival. LPA was informed by S2 that they and Licensee, Sandy Zhao (S3), were unanable to be present at the facility today. LPA's reqeuests had to be translated in Spanish by S2 to S1. Based on investigation, the above allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. A SUBSTANTIATED findingCDSS inspection report, April 30, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260422082110

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff left resident unattended, covered in urine and blood, for extended periods. Staff did not assist resident in a timely manner. Due to a language barrier, staff can't communicate. Inadequate food service.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with staff Jair Melgarieio Martinez and explained the purpose of the visit. The Administrator Brandon Marquez was also contacted and informed about today’s visit. The investigation consisted of staff interviews, resident interviews and record reviews. For the allegation, Staff left resident unattended, covered in urine and blood, for extended periods. During resident interviews, 4 out of the 4 residents stated they have not been left unattended, covered in urine and blood, for an extended period. During staff interviews, 3 out of the 3 staff stated they have not left their residents unattended, covered in urine and blood for an extend period. LPA Rico conducted a facility tour and did not observe residents covered in urine or blood. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 11, 2025 · control 56-AS-20240624141719

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure that the cleaning supplies were inaccessible to residents. Staff did not ensure that medications were properly stored and locked.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 07/01/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melody Brown arrived at the facility unannounced to initiate and deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA Brown was greeted and granted entry by Staff #2 (S2) and LPA Brown explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Brandon-Marquez Gutierez was contacted and informed of the vsit. The investigation consisted of observation, interviews and a review of pertinent documentation. The investigation was conducted by LPA Melody Brown. The investigation consisted of observations and interviews with relevant parties. The allegation indicates that Staff did not ensure that the cleaning supplies were inaccessible to residents. LPA Brown obtained evidence to corroborate the allegation above. During the quick tour of the facility on 07/01/2024, LPA Brown observed multiple bottles of cleaning supplies and chemicals under the kitchen sink, not locked and accessible to residents in care. S2 immediately locked the multiple bottles of chemicalsCDSS inspection report, July 1, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240624141719
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident fell due to staff neglect Staff did not check on residents in a timely manner Staff are not ensuring residents are fed Staff left residents soiled for an extended period of time Staff are not ensuring the facility is clean Staff are not ensuring residents have clean towels Staff did not ensure medication was properly stored Staff did not ensure bathroom was not in disrepair Staff inappropriately recorded resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Prieto met with staff Ortiz and allowed entry. Staff Ortiz phoned licensee Sandi Jhao, who was interviewed and explained the elements of the complaint. Because Jhao was not available, she allowed for staff Ortiz to sign off on this report. Regarding the allegation that resident fell due to staff neglect; Staff interviews could not conclude that any resident had fallen due to neglect. The facility is staffed and small enough to notice if someone had fallen. There is no record of residents falling due to neglect. Resident #1 (R1) and R2 are currently residing in the home state that the facility staff treat them well and care for their needs. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 4, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240530093547

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 25 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
10
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
12
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
8
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
25
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(909) 994-6199
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Kun Bai Care #2 Home? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.