Ivy Park Of Roseville is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Roseville, Placer County, California — state license #315002954, licensed for 140 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 18 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated January 28, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2022, the state has visited this home 27 times and filed 18 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on January 28, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”
The state's published file for this home includes 9 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 5, 2023 to January 28, 2026. 9 of the 9 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unfounded” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 9 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 9 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Jan 28, 2026Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not report incidents to resident's responsible party.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to deliver complaint findings. LPA met with James Dial during today’s inspection. LPA investigated allegation, “Staff did not report incidents to resident's responsible party.” LPA interviewed relevant party in which they stated R1 had a fall in the dining room in December 2025 and the incident was not reported to the responsible party. LPA interviewed Administrator in which he stated he recalled the incident however no documentation was taken and it appears staff did not notify the responsible party or CCL of the fall incident. Due to the information gathered LPA finds allegation to be SUBSTANTIATED. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegations to be (S) Substantiated - A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 28, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260114162229
Jan 9, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jan 7, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 11, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 5, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Aug 28, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 8, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff caused injuries to a resident during transfers
Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Laura Munoz arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Executive Director Neal Torres to deliver findings for the above complaint allegation. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, conducted a tour of the facility, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: ***Report continued on 9099-C*** Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 8, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250303125332
Jan 22, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 26, 2024Unfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility is retaining a resident with a higher level of care needed.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to deliver compliant findings. LPA met with Chad Rogers during today’s inspection. LPA investigated the allegation, “Facility is retaining a resident with a higher level of care needed.” LPA interviewed staff and reviewed facility and resident documentation. Relevant party indicated that R1 had a change of condition resulting in resident requiring a 2 to 3 person assist with care. LPA interviewed staff and found R1 does require a 2-person assist and has a healing stage 1 wound. Homehealth is coming out to the facility to manage wound care. Through interviews LPA found staff are still able to meet R1’s care needs even though she is requiring more extensive care. Continuation on 9099-C. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240821121518
Aug 13, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 1, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate supervision, resulting in a resident wandering away from the facility unsupervised. Staff did not ensure that facility front door alarm was working.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA met with Business Office Director Danette Fadollone during today’s visit. LPA spoke to Administrator over the phone. LPA investigation allegation, “Staff did not provide adequate supervision, resulting in a resident wandering away from the facility unsupervised.” LPA obtained resident records and conducted interviews with staff and relevant party. Relevant Party indicated on March 15th at approximately 2 PM, they arrived at the facility to pick up R1 for a doctor’s appointment. Relevant Party reported they found R1 wandering in the facility parking lot unsupervised. Relevant party reported that facility was unaware resident was wandering outside the facility until she reported the incident. Continuation on 9099-C. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240318090507
Mar 6, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure residents are monitored for early signs of illness while in care. Staff do not ensure infection control requirements are followed.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA met with Chad Rogers during today’s inspection. LPA investigated the allegation, “Staff do not ensure residents are monitored for early signs of illness while in care”. LPA interviewed reporting party in which they reported residents signs and symptoms to facility staff, and staff informed reporting party that resident had to purchase their own covid test. Reporting party stated they purchased a covid test, returned to the facility, and resident tested positive for Covid. Continuation on 9099-C. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 6, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240102141144
Feb 21, 2024Unfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility is not abiding by the admissions agreement. Facility staff are not allowing residents to have visitors.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA met with Chad Rogers during today’s inspection. LPA investigated the allegation, “Facility is not abiding by the admissions agreement”. LPA obtained copies of admission agreement, resident invoices, and other pertinent documents. Reporting party stated resident was being charged for meals to be delivered to resident room which was against the admission agreement. Resident LIC602 states resident is ambulatory and does not require help while feeding themselves.. LPA reviewed resident invoices and observed resident was being charged for rent, care fees, guest meals, and tray service monthly. Continuation on 9099-C. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 21, 2024 · control 59-AS-20231220093910
Jan 10, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent facility from being hazardous leading to resident suffering a fall while in care. Staff attempted to administer a medication that fell on the floor to a resident in care. Staff did not keep facility free of mold. Staff did not respond to resident's request for a meal replacement.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to deliver complaint findings. LPA met with Chad Rogers during today’s inspection. LPA investigated allegation, “Staff did not prevent facility from being hazardous leading to resident suffering a fall while in care”. LPA conducted interviews, file reviews, and toured resident room. LPA interviewed resident in which they stated that upon move in they observed a large warp in the flooring in their bathroom. They informed the facility about this, but while waiting for the floor to be fixed they had a fall and hurt their hand. Resident stated they did not seek medical attention or inform the facility nurse. Resident stated their physical therapist(PT) from an outside agency was aware of the injury. Continuation on 9099-C. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 10, 2024 · control 59-AS-20231108090803
Jan 10, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 12, 2023Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not keep facility free of insects
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to open complaint investigation. LPA met with administrator Chad Rogers during today's inspection. LPA investigated allegation, "Staff did not keep facility free of insects". LPA toured resident room and did not observe any bugs inside or outside of the room. R1 has two marks on their legs that appear to be bug bites. R1 stated they have not seen bugs in their room, but they have "itchy bites" on their legs. LPA interviewed administrator in which he stated bug traps are set in R1's room and they have an exterminator that comes out to the facility monthly to spray and maintain facility. LPA observed marks that looked like bug bites but did not observe bugs within the facility. LPA finds allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 12, 2023 · control 59-AS-20231006161914
Oct 5, 2023Unfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility staff is not ensuring that the kitchen is kept in a sanitary condition.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to investigate complaint allegations. LPA met with Administrator Chad Rogers during today's visit. LPA investigated the allegation of, "Facility staff is not ensuring that the kitchen is kept in a sanitary condition". During inspection on 9/13/23, LPA toured the kitchen, refrigerator, freezer, and kitchen storage areas. LPA found the kitchen appliances, floors, and food preparation areas to be clean and free from dirt and other debris. LPA observed a 2-day perishable and 7-day non-perishable amount of food available for residents. Due to observation LPA finds allegation to be UNFOUNDED. Exit interview conducted. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 5, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230912143739
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Ivy Park Of Roseville licensed?
Yes — Ivy Park Of Roseville is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Roseville (Placer County): California license #315002954, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 140 residents. State records list 18 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated January 28, 2026, was marked “Substantiated” by the state.
Can Ivy Park Of Roseville care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Ivy Park Of Roseville with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 33 AMBULATORY, 107 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 4 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15.
How much does Ivy Park Of Roseville cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Ivy Park Of Roseville's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Placer County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Ivy Park Of Roseville accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Ivy Park Of Roseville is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.
Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
116 of 140 beds occupied (83%) when the state visited on January 28, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Ivy Park Of Roseville?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 27 state visits and 18 dated documents since 2022 for Ivy Park Of Roseville; 9 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated January 28, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2026
2025
2024
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 27 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(916) 780-3330Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Ivy Park Of Roseville? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.