Ansel Park Senior Living Community is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Rocklin, Placer County, California — state license #312700574, licensed for 100 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 32 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 23, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2021, the state has visited this home 35 times and filed 32 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated June 23, 2026.
The state's published file for this home includes 15 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 27, 2021 to July 10, 2025. 15 of the 15 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unfounded” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (8). 15 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 15 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Jun 23, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 23, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 25, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 21, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 18, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 18, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jul 10, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: -Staff does not have criminal background clearance
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today and met with the Executive Director (ED), Keith Payne, and the Assistant Executive Director, Amanda Farley, to open a complaint investigation and deliver complaint investigation findings regarding the above stated allegation. During today's visit, LPA conducted interviews and obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation. Interview with ED indicated that staff (S1) is employed in the independent living section of the facility as a transportation driver. S1 provides transportation periodically for residents in the assisted living and memory care sections of the facility. S1 does not have fingerprint clearance or exemption and is not associated to the facility. Based on interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standards have been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, a deficiency is being cited on tthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 10, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250709102716
Nov 14, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: -Staff interfered with the residents' visitation
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today, 11/14/24, and met with the Executive Director (ED), Keith Payne, to deliver complaint investigation findings into the above stated allegation. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation. Interviews with staff (S1, S2, and S3) indicated that S3, who is a former staff member, arrived at the care home on 11/2/24 to visit residents (R1 & R2). Interviews with S2, S3, R1, and R2 indicated that S3 signed in at the front desk to visit R1 and R2. Interview with S2 indicated that they contacted the ED by phone and informed them that S3 was in the building visiting R1 and R2. According to Human Resources, ED, and S2, S3 is required to obtain written approval from the ED prior to visiting any residents at the care home. **********************************************Continued on LIC9099-C************************************************** Unsubstthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 14, 2024 · control 59-AS-20241104155417
Nov 14, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 8, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 7, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 7, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 30, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: -Staff do not ensure that facility faucets deliver hot water
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today, 10/30/24, and met with the Executive Director, Keith Payne, to open a complaint investigation into the above stated allegation. LPA delivered findings as well. During today's visit, LPA conducted interviews and checked the water temperature in five (5) apartments in Assisted Living and two (2) apartments in Pathways Memory Care. The water temperature was within the regulatory range of 105-120 degrees F in four (4) of five (5) apartments in Assisted Living and one (1) of two (2) apartments in Memory Care. Apartment #100 bathroom sink took approximately 15 minutes to indicate a water temperature of 104 degrees F. LPA rechecked the temperature later in the visit and it was 107.1 degrees F. Apartment #168 had a water temperature of 78.6 degrees F in the kitchen sink. Apartment #179 had a water temperature of 103 degrees F in the bathroom sink. ************************************************Continued on LIC9099-C**the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 30, 2024 · control 59-AS-20241025105323
May 9, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: -Residents' rooms are not being kept clean and sanitary
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the facility unannounced today, 5/9/24, and met with the Executive Director, Deborah Taylor, to open and deliver complaint investigation findings into the above stated allegation. During today's visit, LPA toured five (5) residents' (R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5) apartments and interviewed the Maintenance Director. **********************************************Continued on LIC9099-C**************************************************** Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 9, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240506134242
May 9, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Apr 17, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: -Residents are not receiving ADLs. -Facility is not providing adequate food services.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived unannounced at the care home today, 4/17/24, and met with the Executive Director, Deborah Taylor, to deliver complaint investigation findings into the above stated allegations. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews, obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation, and conducted an inspection of the food supply. Allegation: Residents are not receiving ADLs. Interviews with residents (R2 and R3) indicated that they are receiving all ADLs from care staff. R2 and R3 indicated that if they need anything staff are there and ready to assist. R2 and R3 indicated that all of their needs are being met by facility staff. Staff (S1 and S2) indicated that they have never observed other care staff not providing ADLs to residents in care. *********************************************Continued on LIC9099-C*********************************************** Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240306093035
Oct 25, 2023Unfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide adequate food service. Facility staff are not ensuring the facility is maintained.
On 10/25/2023 LPA Tryon visited the facility to open this complaint. LPA met with Executive Director Deborah Taylor. LPA spoke with E.D., staff and residents; reviewed kitchen sanitation training records and viewed lunch meal, food supplies, dishes and utensils. Regarding the allegation that staff do not provide adequate food service, LPA found that food supplies appeared to be plentiful, varied and fresh. LPA viewed open bread packs/sandwiches on plates and saw no sign that the bread was not fresh; it appeared very fresh. LPA learned that bread is purchased and stored frozen, (or made fresh daily), is only taken out of the freezer one day before being used. Bread is taken out in quantities that are estimated to be needed, and most supplies are used each day as opened. Any leftovers are put on the front of the bread carts to be used first the next day. LPA viewed lettuce supplies which were fresh, and viewed plated salads/sandwiches, lettuce appeared fresh and not wilted. LPA learned tthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 25, 2023 · control 59-AS-20231019160403
Sep 21, 2023Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 12, 2023Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Ansel Park Senior Living Community licensed?
Yes — Ansel Park Senior Living Community is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Rocklin (Placer County): California license #312700574, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 100 residents. State records list 32 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 23, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.
Can Ansel Park Senior Living Community care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Ansel Park Senior Living Community with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 100 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15.
How much does Ansel Park Senior Living Community cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Ansel Park Senior Living Community's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Placer County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Ansel Park Senior Living Community accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Ansel Park Senior Living Community is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.
Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
78 of 100 beds occupied (78%) when the state visited on July 10, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Ansel Park Senior Living Community?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 35 state visits and 32 dated documents since 2021 for Ansel Park Senior Living Community; 15 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated July 10, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2025
2024
2023
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 35 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(916) 250-0770Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Ansel Park Senior Living Community? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.