Seville Of San Clemente, The is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Clemente, Orange County, California — state license #306006584, licensed for 130 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 13 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2024, the most recent dated July 3, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2024, the state has visited this home 18 times and filed 13 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 3, 2026.
The state's published file for this home includes 6 documents with transcribed findings, dated February 3, 2025 to March 18, 2026. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 6 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Jul 3, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Mar 18, 2026Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Lack of supervision resulted in resident being left outside Facility did not notify resident's responsible party of change in resident's reappraisal
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and witnesses. Regarding the allegations that lack of supervision resulted in resident being left outside and facility did not notify resident's responsible party of change in resident's reappraisal, the investigation revealed the following: On 01/13/2026, Resident 1 (R1) was observed by Staff 1 (S1) outside on a front patio at approximately 6:05 AM in pajamas. R1 was unable to get back inside the facility due to a key fob being necessary as doors are locked in the overnight hours. S1 was coming into work when the resident was observed outside. Resident was determined to be ice cold but no injuries noted. Resident's room is located in the rear of the building and there are no stathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260114091113
Mar 18, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jan 22, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Aug 19, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not administer medications as prescribed. Facility did not properly secure dangerous items. Facility did not properly assess residents.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jessica Cho made an unannounced visit for the purpose of continuing and concluding the complaint investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Roger Endert and explained the reason for the visit. On Feburary 20, 2025, the Department received a complaint, and the investigation was initiated on Feburary 27, 2025 followed by subsequent visits on July 24, 2025 and August 19, 2025. During the course of the investigation, apartment inspections, medication audits, file reviews, interviews were conducted for six residents as well as interviews with four staff. The investigation is as follows: Regarding the allegation, Facility did not administer medications as prescribed, it is alleged that staff were "pushed" to administer Trazadone without a doctor's order for Resident #1 (R1). Faclity received an order for R1's Trazadone on March 5, 2025 at 10:20am. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 19, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250220153051
Aug 7, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged residents’ medications Staff did not assist resident with care needs in a timely manner
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Brandon Lopez and Garlli Tat made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings of the complaint investigation into the allegations listed above. LPAs met with Director of Health and Wellness Lori Salas and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed staff and residents, obtained and reviewed resident and staff records. The investigation revealed the following: It was alleged that staff mismanaged residents’ medication. LPA reviewed the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated May 1, 2025, to May 16, 2025, for R1. LPA additionally reviewed the prescription for R1’s Prednisone 20 MG tablet, which was prescribed on May 15, 2025, and states that R1 is to receive two tablets by mouth daily for three days. Per the MAR, R1 received her first dosage of her prescribed Prednisone 20 MG tablet medication on May 16, 2025. CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250523142433
Jul 31, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure the facility has certified administrator
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and Andrea Mendivil conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff. Regarding the allegation that Licensee does not ensure the facility has certified administrator, the investigation revealed the following: Information reported to LPA indicated that Staff 1 (S1) was no longer Administrator at the facility. Facility stated S1's last day was between 05/15-05/20/2025. The date of the initial complaint investigation was 06/24/2025 and facility had not notified LPA of the change. Based on interviews conducted and observation, the allegation is determined to be SUBSTANTIATED, meaning the complaint allegation is valid and that a violation has occurred. The following is being cited per California Code of Regulations Titthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 31, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250618104742
Jul 31, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 24, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility has insufficient staffing to meet the needs of residents in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents. Regarding the allegation that facility has insufficient staffing to met the needs of the residents, the investigation revealed the following: Facility schedule indicates six caregivers and two med techs for 1st shift, six caregivers and one med tech for second shift and 4 staff on NOC shift. LPA observed adequate staffing on two different visits. Five out of seven staff state staffing levels are adequate and resident needs are being met. Four out of four residents state staffing levels are OK and have improved slowly since the facility opened. Four out of four residents indicate their needs are being met. Based on observations and interviews, LPA is unable to corrobthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 24, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250305123959
Feb 3, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility lacks supervision of Memory Care Residents
On this day LIcensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to conduct a complaint investigation. LPA was greeted and grated entry into the facility by Executive Director Justin Telles and explained the reason for the visit. The Department received a complaint on 01/27/2025 and LPA Mendivil conducted the initial 10 day visit on 02/03/2025. LPA obtained copies of pertinent documents such as resident roster, staff schedule, and vigil memory care system alerts. LPA Mendivil also interviewed staff and residents. Regarding the allegations facility lacks supervision of Memory Care residents, the investigation revealed the following: It was alleged the facility lacks supervision of Memory Care residents. Per review of resident roster Memory Care has 13 residents and a total for 4 staff for AM shift, 4 for PM and 2-3 for nocturnal shift. LPA Mendivil toured the facility and observed residents in a common area watching TV and a few in their rooms. There was staff presethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250127090735
Feb 3, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Aug 19, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Aug 9, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Seville Of San Clemente, The licensed?
Yes — Seville Of San Clemente, The is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Clemente (Orange County): California license #306006584, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 130 residents. State records list 13 inspection and complaint documents since 2024; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 3, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.
Can Seville Of San Clemente, The care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Seville Of San Clemente, The with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 130 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. ALL ROOMS APPROVED FOR NON-AMBULATORY AND BEDRIDDEN. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (20). DELAYED EGRESS APPROVED IN MEMORY CARE.
How much does Seville Of San Clemente, The cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Seville Of San Clemente, The's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Seville Of San Clemente, The accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Seville Of San Clemente, The is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.
Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
70 of 130 beds occupied (54%) when the state visited on March 18, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Seville Of San Clemente, The?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 18 state visits and 13 dated documents since 2024 for Seville Of San Clemente, The; 6 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 18, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2026
2025
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 18 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(760) 382-3463Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Seville Of San Clemente, The? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.