Home At Cascade Lane, Inc. is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Huntington Beach, Orange County, California — state license #306006496, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 11 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2024, the most recent dated July 15, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

4 homes in view

Home At Cascade Lane, Inc.

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Huntington Beach, CA · Orange County
LicensedMemory careHospiceBedriddenWheelchair not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306006496, held since 2024 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
15311 Cascade Lane · Huntington Beach, Orange County
Phone
(714) 515-0459
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file — ask the home
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 6 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 1 resident

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
APPROVED FOR; AGES 60+; 6 TOTAL BED CAPACITY (5 NON-AMB OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM 2). WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR 6State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2024, the state has visited this home 14 times and filed 11 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 15, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 15, 2026
Occupancy at the January 28, 2026 visit
6 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated January 21, 2026 to January 28, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 12 of 11 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20265 state visits · 8 documents
Jul 15, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are ignoring call buttons.

On today's date January 28, 2026 Licensing Program Analysts (LPA's) William Vanegas and Brandon Lopez made an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate the investigation to the above listed allegation and to deliver the complaint findings. LPA's were greeted and granted entry to the facility by facility staff, LPA's explained the purpose of the visit, LPA's conducted a tour of the facility and observed residents in care lounging in respective common areas and their bedrooms. LPA's conducted resident and staff interviews. Additionally LPA's collected and conducted record review for residents in care, documents collected include; resident roster, staff records, and resident records. Regarding the allegation that, facility staff are ignoring call buttons, the following has been concluded: LPA's conducted five resident interviews. Two out of the five residents were unable to be qualified for an interview. Another resident interviewed confirmed the allegation and stated that staff sometthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 28, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260121075045
Jan 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Lack of care and supervision Facility staff are not dispensing medications as prescribed Facility are not providing residents privacy

On January 21, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eboni Bentley arrived at the facility unannounced for a subsequent complaint investigation visit into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry after stating the purpose of the visit to staff. Administrator Jeannie Dao was contacted via telephone, notified about the reason for the visit, and granted permission for Caregiver Maria Perkins to sign the report. Regarding allegation, Lack of care and supervision, it is alleged that Resident 1 (R1) is sleeping in a recliner chair in the living room, resulting in falls and sustaining bruising. During visits conducted on December 29, 2025 and January 7, 2026, LPA observed R1 watching television and falling asleep on the recliner in the living room, after breakfast and lunch. On multipe ocassions throughout the visits, LPA observed staff in the living room, checking on R1 and attending to all residnets in care. Four out of four residents interviewed denied there being a lack ofthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 21, 2026 · control 22-AS-20251222133927
Jan 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not giving residents their mail.

Regarding the allegation, Staff are not giving residents their mail, it is alleged that staff are not giving residents their mail. During interview conducted, four out of four residents confirmed receiving mail promptly if any and three of the residents confirmed that mail is still delivered to their previous address managed by their families. R1 stated all mail and legal documents are sent to R1’s family member. Three out of three staff denied the allegation stating residents are given their mail when it is delivered. Three out of four witnesses denied the allegation stating that the mail is received directly by the representatives at their respective locations and that the staff are forwarding the mail in a timely manner. A record review of R1’s Physician Report indicated R1 has a Dementia diagnosis. During visits to the facility, LPA did not observe any undelivered mail for R1. Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, although the allegation may have happened or arethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 21, 2026 · control 22-AS-20251222133927
Jan 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not communicate with resident’s family. Facility staff did not follow resident’s dietary restrictions.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jessica Cho made an unannounced visit for the purpose of continuing the investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted by Caregiver Jesus Manalansan and stated the reason for the visit. During the course of investigation, LPA toured the physical plant, interviewed three witnesses, and five out of six residents. LPA was unable to obtain one resident's statement due to their medical condition. LPA obtained the following documentation for review: Resident Roster, Face Sheets, Physician's Reports, Admission Agreements, and menu. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation, Facilty staff did not communicate with resident's family, it is alleged that the families were not informed about the new owner of the business. Per interviews, four witnesses and two residents who are self-responsible confirmed the change in administrator from Staff #1 (S1) to Staff #2 (S2). The interviewed parties mentioned that the change in administratthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 21, 2026 · control 22-AS-20251216150102
Jan 7, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
May 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations2typical 0
Substantiated complaints2typical 0
Total complaints4typical 0
State visits on file14typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2024.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202658020252202024220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$4,000$6,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?
How are care plans reviewed when a resident’s needs change?

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (714) 515-0459

Is Home At Cascade Lane, Inc. licensed?

Yes — Home At Cascade Lane, Inc. is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Huntington Beach (Orange County): California license #306006496, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 11 inspection and complaint documents since 2024; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 15, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Home At Cascade Lane, Inc. care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Home At Cascade Lane, Inc. with clearances for dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list wheelchair / non-ambulatory. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAPPROVED FOR; AGES 60+; 6 TOTAL BED CAPACITY (5 NON-AMB OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM 2). WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR 6

How much does Home At Cascade Lane, Inc. cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Home At Cascade Lane, Inc.'s monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Home At Cascade Lane, Inc. accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Home At Cascade Lane, Inc. is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

6 of 6 beds occupied (100%) when the state visited on January 28, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Home At Cascade Lane, Inc.?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 14 state visits and 11 dated documents since 2024 for Home At Cascade Lane, Inc.; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated January 28, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are ignoring call buttons.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On today's date January 28, 2026 Licensing Program Analysts (LPA's) William Vanegas and Brandon Lopez made an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate the investigation to the above listed allegation and to deliver the complaint findings. LPA's were greeted and granted entry to the facility by facility staff, LPA's explained the purpose of the visit, LPA's conducted a tour of the facility and observed residents in care lounging in respective common areas and their bedrooms. LPA's conducted resident and staff interviews. Additionally LPA's collected and conducted record review for residents in care, documents collected include; resident roster, staff records, and resident records. Regarding the allegation that, facility staff are ignoring call buttons, the following has been concluded: LPA's conducted five resident interviews. Two out of the five residents were unable to be qualified for an interview. Another resident interviewed confirmed the allegation and stated that staff sometCDSS inspection report, January 28, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260121075045
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedLack of care and supervision Facility staff are not dispensing medications as prescribed Facility are not providing residents privacy
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On January 21, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eboni Bentley arrived at the facility unannounced for a subsequent complaint investigation visit into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry after stating the purpose of the visit to staff. Administrator Jeannie Dao was contacted via telephone, notified about the reason for the visit, and granted permission for Caregiver Maria Perkins to sign the report. Regarding allegation, Lack of care and supervision, it is alleged that Resident 1 (R1) is sleeping in a recliner chair in the living room, resulting in falls and sustaining bruising. During visits conducted on December 29, 2025 and January 7, 2026, LPA observed R1 watching television and falling asleep on the recliner in the living room, after breakfast and lunch. On multipe ocassions throughout the visits, LPA observed staff in the living room, checking on R1 and attending to all residnets in care. Four out of four residents interviewed denied there being a lack ofCDSS inspection report, January 21, 2026 · control 22-AS-20251222133927
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not giving residents their mail.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Regarding the allegation, Staff are not giving residents their mail, it is alleged that staff are not giving residents their mail. During interview conducted, four out of four residents confirmed receiving mail promptly if any and three of the residents confirmed that mail is still delivered to their previous address managed by their families. R1 stated all mail and legal documents are sent to R1’s family member. Three out of three staff denied the allegation stating residents are given their mail when it is delivered. Three out of four witnesses denied the allegation stating that the mail is received directly by the representatives at their respective locations and that the staff are forwarding the mail in a timely manner. A record review of R1’s Physician Report indicated R1 has a Dementia diagnosis. During visits to the facility, LPA did not observe any undelivered mail for R1. Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, although the allegation may have happened or areCDSS inspection report, January 21, 2026 · control 22-AS-20251222133927
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not communicate with resident’s family. Facility staff did not follow resident’s dietary restrictions.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jessica Cho made an unannounced visit for the purpose of continuing the investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted by Caregiver Jesus Manalansan and stated the reason for the visit. During the course of investigation, LPA toured the physical plant, interviewed three witnesses, and five out of six residents. LPA was unable to obtain one resident's statement due to their medical condition. LPA obtained the following documentation for review: Resident Roster, Face Sheets, Physician's Reports, Admission Agreements, and menu. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation, Facilty staff did not communicate with resident's family, it is alleged that the families were not informed about the new owner of the business. Per interviews, four witnesses and two residents who are self-responsible confirmed the change in administrator from Staff #1 (S1) to Staff #2 (S2). The interviewed parties mentioned that the change in administratCDSS inspection report, January 21, 2026 · control 22-AS-20251216150102

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 14 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
14
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(714) 515-0459
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Home At Cascade Lane, Inc.? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.