Crescendo Senior Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Placentia, Orange County, California — state license #306006473, licensed for 210 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 14 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2024, the most recent dated March 11, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

18 homes in view

Crescendo Senior Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 210 residents · Placentia, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306006473, held since 2024 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
351 East Palm Drive · Placentia, Orange County
Phone
(714) 528-4990
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 210 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 10 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF 210 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN; WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (20); SECURED PERIMETER APPROVED FOR MEMORY CARE FACILITY 331 E PALMState service designations935 - ELDERLY · 983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2024, the state has visited this home 15 times and filed 14 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on March 11, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
May 18, 2026
Occupancy at the March 11, 2026 visit
95 of 210 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 9 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 9, 2024 to March 11, 2026. 9 of the 9 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (6). 9 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 9 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 14 of 14 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20264 state visits · 4 documents
Mar 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure facility plumbing is in good repair.

An unannounced Complaint Investigation was conducted on this day regarding the allegation mentioned above by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Laurie Galal and the purpose of the inspection was discussed. Interviews were conducted with eight facility residents and four staff. During their interview, Resident (R1) stated they have had plumbing issues on and off during the entire time they have been residing at the facility, approximately five years. Per R1, in January 2026, the floor in their bedroom and bathroom became flooded and they were informed the leak was coming from Resident 2’s (R2’s) and Resident 3’s (R3’s) bathroom. R1 stated they were hospitalized in February 2026 and a dry washcloth was placed next to their bathroom sink and it should have been dry as no one should have been using the sink in their bathroom, however, the washcloth was wet. Per R1, Resident 4 (R4) and Resident 5 (R5) have also had plumbing issues, as welthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 11, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260303085841
Mar 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 23, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is mismanaging resident's medications. Staff does not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident sustaining multiple falls.

On February 23, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brandon Lopez made an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate the investigation into the allegations listed above and to deliver the complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by staff after explaining the purpose for the visit. Director of Wellness Alex Gutierrez was notified via telephone and later arrived to assist with the inspection. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted resident interviews, staff interviews, reviewed medication and medication administration records, reviewed and collected pertinent documents for this complaint. Regarding the allegation, staff is mismanaging resident's medications, the following has been concluded: It was alleged that staff are mismanaging Resident #1 (R1) medication. LPA reviewed the medications, the prescribed orders, and the medication administration records for R1. LPA observed that staff were providing the routine medications to R1 accordithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 23, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260218185737
Feb 3, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are discriminating against a resident. Staff are not allowing resident to participate in activities.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to investigation the above identified complaint allegations and deliver findings. LPA Martinez met with Laurie Galal, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted, a tour of the physical plant of the facility was conducted, a review of facility records was completed and copy of pertinent documents obtained. It is alleged that staff are discriminating against a resident, specifically being told they cannot speak Spanish at the premises. Interview with staff stated that they do not tell residents what language to speak, there are staff that speak various languages and can communicate with residents without a problem. The facility has various residents that their primary language isn’t English, and they do not interfere with their Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260126142017
20255 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not accept resident back after hospital stay.

An unannounced Complaint Investigation was conducted on this day by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Laurie Galal and explained the purpose of the inspection. Complaint alleges Facility did not accept Resident 1 (R1) back after their hospital stay. On December 16, 2025, R1 was hospitalized and placed on a psychiatric hold. On December 22, 2025, the Department received a request for prior approval of 3-Day eviction of R1 from the facility. On December 24, 2025, the Department denied the facility’s request, and Wellness Director (WD) Kim Mims was notified of the Department’s decision by phone. Denial letter was also sent via certified mailed to Licensee’s mailing address. (Cont. LIC9099-C) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 26, 2025 · control 22-AS-20251223164221
Dec 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff handled resident roughly

An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted on this day by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez regarding the allegation mentioned above. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Laurie Galal and discussed the purpose of the inspection. Regarding the allegation, Staff handled resident roughly, the following was revealed: it is alleged (Staff 1) S1 grabbed Resident 1 (R1) and had them "dangling" for about five to seven minutes. Interviews were conducted with R1, four additional facility residents, S1, and two additional staff. During their interview, R1 corroborated the allegation and stated S1 handled them in a rough manner while assisting them with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Per R1, S1 lifted them up in a rough manner using their arms, however, was unable to go into further detail or indicate if S1's actions led to an injury. During their interview, four of four additional residents interviewed denied being handled in a rough manner and denied having any knowthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 18, 2025 · control 22-AS-20251211114703
Dec 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure resident received medication as prescribed. Resident sustained unexplained bruising while in care. Staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident sustaining multiple falls. Staff did not notify resident's responsible party of change in resident's condition. Staff did not safe guard resident's personal belongings.

An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted on this day by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez regarding the allegations mentioned above. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Laurie Galal and discussed the purpose of the inspection. Regarding the allegation, Staff did not ensure resident received medication as prescribed, the following was revealed: it is alleged Resident 1 (R1) did receive a routine medication from January 05, 2025 to January 12, 2025 due to facility staff not refilling the medication. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted record review of R1’s Medication Administration Records (MARs) and observed routine medication in question to have been administered every day for the month of January 2025. During their interview, R1 was unable to confirm or deny allegation. LPA attempted to contact R1’s responsible party, Witness 1 (W1) on three separate occasions, however, W1 could not be reached to confirm or deny allegation. LPA conductedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 18, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250226154531
Nov 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure facility plumbing is in good repair.

An unannounced Complaint Investigation was conducted on this day regarding the allegation mentioned above by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Laurie Galal and Wellness Director (WD) Kim Mims Interviews were conducted with four facility residents regarding the allegation, Staff does not ensure facility plumbing is in good repair. During their interview, Resident (R1) denied the allegation. During their interview, Resident 2 (R2) denied having any plumbing issues in their private bathroom, however, stated that Resident 3 (R3) has had plumbing issues due to their toilet being clogged and stated they believed R3 was flushing large wipes down the toilet. During their Resident 3 (R3) stated their toilet had been clogged but was immediately repaired by maintenance staff with no impact to their living accommodations. During their interview, R4 denied having any plumbing issues pertaining to their private bathroom, however, stated that R3'sthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 25, 2025 · control 22-AS-20251123164608
Sep 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not give the resident's medication as prescribed.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and resident. Regarding the allegation that facility staff did not give the resident's medication as prescribed, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) is diagnosed with Dementia per physician report dated 04/26/2024. Per review of facility charting, resident is having instances of hallucinations. LPA interviewed the resident who denied being poisoned by the facility with medications or vinegar. Resident stated having vinegar for cleaning needs. Review of the resident's medication orders and medication administration record indicated resident is receiving medications as prescribed. Facility manages resident medications. Based on interviews conducted and record revithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 19, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250214132731
20244 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: rDue to lack of supervision, resident had an unwitnessed fall

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of delivering findings into the investigation of the allegation listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Executive Director Laurel Galal after explaining the purpose of the visit. An initial investigation visit was held on October 1, 2024. During this visit, LPA requested and obtained the facility's census for the assisted living and memory care buildings. Resident records including physician report, individual needs and services plan, resident assessments as well as hospital visit reports for 2023 and 2024 were provided for resident R1. An interview with R1 was conducted along with two memory care staff interviews. Additional witness interviews were conducted via telephone. CONTINUED ON FORM LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240923104800
Aug 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints5typical 2
Total complaints9typical 7
State visits on file15typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2024.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202644120255612024440
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (714) 528-4990

Is Crescendo Senior Living licensed?

Yes — Crescendo Senior Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Placentia (Orange County): California license #306006473, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 210 residents. State records list 14 inspection and complaint documents since 2024; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated March 11, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Crescendo Senior Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Crescendo Senior Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF 210 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN; WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (20); SECURED PERIMETER APPROVED FOR MEMORY CARE FACILITY 331 E PALM

How much does Crescendo Senior Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Crescendo Senior Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Crescendo Senior Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Crescendo Senior Living through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Orange County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

95 of 210 beds occupied (45%) when the state visited on March 11, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Crescendo Senior Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 15 state visits and 14 dated documents since 2024 for Crescendo Senior Living; 9 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 11, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

9 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure facility plumbing is in good repair.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
An unannounced Complaint Investigation was conducted on this day regarding the allegation mentioned above by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Laurie Galal and the purpose of the inspection was discussed. Interviews were conducted with eight facility residents and four staff. During their interview, Resident (R1) stated they have had plumbing issues on and off during the entire time they have been residing at the facility, approximately five years. Per R1, in January 2026, the floor in their bedroom and bathroom became flooded and they were informed the leak was coming from Resident 2’s (R2’s) and Resident 3’s (R3’s) bathroom. R1 stated they were hospitalized in February 2026 and a dry washcloth was placed next to their bathroom sink and it should have been dry as no one should have been using the sink in their bathroom, however, the washcloth was wet. Per R1, Resident 4 (R4) and Resident 5 (R5) have also had plumbing issues, as welCDSS inspection report, March 11, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260303085841
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is mismanaging resident's medications. Staff does not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident sustaining multiple falls.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On February 23, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brandon Lopez made an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate the investigation into the allegations listed above and to deliver the complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by staff after explaining the purpose for the visit. Director of Wellness Alex Gutierrez was notified via telephone and later arrived to assist with the inspection. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted resident interviews, staff interviews, reviewed medication and medication administration records, reviewed and collected pertinent documents for this complaint. Regarding the allegation, staff is mismanaging resident's medications, the following has been concluded: It was alleged that staff are mismanaging Resident #1 (R1) medication. LPA reviewed the medications, the prescribed orders, and the medication administration records for R1. LPA observed that staff were providing the routine medications to R1 accordiCDSS inspection report, February 23, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260218185737
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are discriminating against a resident. Staff are not allowing resident to participate in activities.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to investigation the above identified complaint allegations and deliver findings. LPA Martinez met with Laurie Galal, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted, a tour of the physical plant of the facility was conducted, a review of facility records was completed and copy of pertinent documents obtained. It is alleged that staff are discriminating against a resident, specifically being told they cannot speak Spanish at the premises. Interview with staff stated that they do not tell residents what language to speak, there are staff that speak various languages and can communicate with residents without a problem. The facility has various residents that their primary language isn’t English, and they do not interfere with their Continued on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 3, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260126142017

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not accept resident back after hospital stay.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
An unannounced Complaint Investigation was conducted on this day by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Laurie Galal and explained the purpose of the inspection. Complaint alleges Facility did not accept Resident 1 (R1) back after their hospital stay. On December 16, 2025, R1 was hospitalized and placed on a psychiatric hold. On December 22, 2025, the Department received a request for prior approval of 3-Day eviction of R1 from the facility. On December 24, 2025, the Department denied the facility’s request, and Wellness Director (WD) Kim Mims was notified of the Department’s decision by phone. Denial letter was also sent via certified mailed to Licensee’s mailing address. (Cont. LIC9099-C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 26, 2025 · control 22-AS-20251223164221
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff handled resident roughly
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted on this day by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez regarding the allegation mentioned above. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Laurie Galal and discussed the purpose of the inspection. Regarding the allegation, Staff handled resident roughly, the following was revealed: it is alleged (Staff 1) S1 grabbed Resident 1 (R1) and had them "dangling" for about five to seven minutes. Interviews were conducted with R1, four additional facility residents, S1, and two additional staff. During their interview, R1 corroborated the allegation and stated S1 handled them in a rough manner while assisting them with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Per R1, S1 lifted them up in a rough manner using their arms, however, was unable to go into further detail or indicate if S1's actions led to an injury. During their interview, four of four additional residents interviewed denied being handled in a rough manner and denied having any knowCDSS inspection report, December 18, 2025 · control 22-AS-20251211114703
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure resident received medication as prescribed. Resident sustained unexplained bruising while in care. Staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident sustaining multiple falls. Staff did not notify resident's responsible party of change in resident's condition. Staff did not safe guard resident's personal belongings.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted on this day by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez regarding the allegations mentioned above. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Laurie Galal and discussed the purpose of the inspection. Regarding the allegation, Staff did not ensure resident received medication as prescribed, the following was revealed: it is alleged Resident 1 (R1) did receive a routine medication from January 05, 2025 to January 12, 2025 due to facility staff not refilling the medication. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted record review of R1’s Medication Administration Records (MARs) and observed routine medication in question to have been administered every day for the month of January 2025. During their interview, R1 was unable to confirm or deny allegation. LPA attempted to contact R1’s responsible party, Witness 1 (W1) on three separate occasions, however, W1 could not be reached to confirm or deny allegation. LPA conductedCDSS inspection report, December 18, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250226154531
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure facility plumbing is in good repair.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
An unannounced Complaint Investigation was conducted on this day regarding the allegation mentioned above by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Laurie Galal and Wellness Director (WD) Kim Mims Interviews were conducted with four facility residents regarding the allegation, Staff does not ensure facility plumbing is in good repair. During their interview, Resident (R1) denied the allegation. During their interview, Resident 2 (R2) denied having any plumbing issues in their private bathroom, however, stated that Resident 3 (R3) has had plumbing issues due to their toilet being clogged and stated they believed R3 was flushing large wipes down the toilet. During their Resident 3 (R3) stated their toilet had been clogged but was immediately repaired by maintenance staff with no impact to their living accommodations. During their interview, R4 denied having any plumbing issues pertaining to their private bathroom, however, stated that R3'sCDSS inspection report, November 25, 2025 · control 22-AS-20251123164608
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not give the resident's medication as prescribed.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and resident. Regarding the allegation that facility staff did not give the resident's medication as prescribed, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) is diagnosed with Dementia per physician report dated 04/26/2024. Per review of facility charting, resident is having instances of hallucinations. LPA interviewed the resident who denied being poisoned by the facility with medications or vinegar. Resident stated having vinegar for cleaning needs. Review of the resident's medication orders and medication administration record indicated resident is receiving medications as prescribed. Facility manages resident medications. Based on interviews conducted and record reviCDSS inspection report, February 19, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250214132731

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedrDue to lack of supervision, resident had an unwitnessed fall
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of delivering findings into the investigation of the allegation listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Executive Director Laurel Galal after explaining the purpose of the visit. An initial investigation visit was held on October 1, 2024. During this visit, LPA requested and obtained the facility's census for the assisted living and memory care buildings. Resident records including physician report, individual needs and services plan, resident assessments as well as hospital visit reports for 2023 and 2024 were provided for resident R1. An interview with R1 was conducted along with two memory care staff interviews. Additional witness interviews were conducted via telephone. CONTINUED ON FORM LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 9, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240923104800

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 15 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
5
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
9
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
15
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(714) 528-4990
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Crescendo Senior Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.