San Clemente Villas By The Sea is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Clemente, Orange County, California — state license #306006472, licensed for 190 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 16 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2024, the most recent dated July 9, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

9 homes in view

San Clemente Villas By The Sea

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 190 residents · San Clemente, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306006472, held since 2024 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
660 Camino De Los Mares · San Clemente, Orange County
Phone
(949) 489-3400
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 120 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 40 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 190 AMBULATORY OF WHICH 120 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY AND 40 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20. DELAYED EGRESS APPROVED FOR MEMORYCARE. MGMT COMPANY SUNRISE SR LIVING MANAGEMENT INC EFFECTIVE 5/27/26.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2024, the state has visited this home 17 times and filed 16 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 9, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 16, 2026
Occupancy at the May 14, 2026 visit
85 of 190 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 8 documents with transcribed findings, dated February 10, 2025 to May 14, 2026. 8 of the 8 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 8 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 8 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 16 of 16 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20264 state visits · 6 documents
Jul 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 14, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure that residents are administered their medications as prescribed Staff mismanage residents' medications

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the memory care unit and interviewed staff as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as medication administration records (MAR). Regarding the allegations that staff do not ensure that residents are administered their medications as prescribed and staff mismanage residents' medications, the investigation revealed the following: LPA toured resident rooms and memory care unit on two different occasions and did not observe any medications in rooms or common areas. Four out of five staff deny finding medications lying around. One staff stated finding a medication in the dining room one time. LPA reviewed the MAR for five residents. All five MAR's have documented reasons for missed medications. Resithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260421085522
May 14, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff member worked while under the influence of drugs, impairing their ability to provide adequate care and supervision, which presents a risk to residents in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the memory care unit and interviewed staff. Regarding the allegation that staff member worked while under the influence of drugs, impairing their ability to provide adequate care and supervision, which presents a risk to residents in care, the investigation revealed the following: Five out of five staff interviewed deny any knowledge of a staff being present under the influence. Five out of five staff deny any staff sleeping in the facility before their shift. Administrator indicates no knowledge as well and confirms there have been no write-ups or terminations for this type of behavior. Based on interviews conducted, LPA is unable to corroborate the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated,the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260420154329
Apr 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility gave resident another resident's psychotropic meds which resulted in hospitalization

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducte an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, the department reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as facility notes. Regarding the allegation that facility gave resident another resident's psychotropic meds which resulted in hospitalization, the investigation revealed the following: Facility self reported an incident on 09/04/2024 where Resident 1 (R1) was incorrectly given another resident's Seroquel, Risperidone, and Lorazapam. R1 was transferred to Mission Hospital for observation and remained admitted until 09/08/2024. Facility notes indicate Mission Hospital stated there were no adverse effects from the medication error. Staff 1 (S1) was provided a written warning from the facility. Review of records showed the staff had received medication training frothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2026 · control 22-AS-20240923110559
Apr 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff do not communicate changes in care to authorized representative Staff not providing records to the authorized representative

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. Long Term Care Ombudsman Patricia McKeon was present as well. During the visit, LPA interviewed Administrator as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as facility notes. Regarding the allegations that staff do not communicate changes in care to authorized representative and staff not providing records to the authorized representative, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) was re-assessed on 03/24/2026 and 04/01/2026 after two instances of elopement out of the facility in March 2026. Per physician reports dated 10/02/2022 and 03/24/2026, R1 is diagnosed with Mild Cognitive Impairment and unable to leave the facility unassisted. Both assessments were provided to responsible party and time stamps on documents confirthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260402125930
Apr 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20257 state visits · 8 documents
Sep 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility is charging a resident for services not rendered

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents. Regarding the allegation that facility is charging a resident for services not rendered, the investigation revealed the following: Information reported to the department indicated Resident 1 (R1) is being charged for dressing assistance. LPA reviewed resident assessment dated 12/17/2024 which showed that the resident is not being charged for dressing. Resident and staff denied staff are assisting with dressing. Based on record review and interviews conducted, the allegation is deemed UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was left at the facilitthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 12, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250619121530
Sep 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff communicate in a language that residents are unable to understand Staff are mismanaging residents' medications

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to continue the investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the memory care unit and interviewed staff. Regarding the allegations that staff communicate in a language that residents are unable to understand and staff are mismanaging residents' medications, the investigation revealed the following: Facility Executive Director indicates staff are to speak to residents in a language they are able to understand. Most speak English to residents but Spanish speaking residents prefer the staff speak Spanish with them. Eight out of nine staff state residents are able to understand the staff and there is no issue with language. Staff 1 (S1) indicates the language barrier is directed at the staff and not the residents. LPA unsuccessfully attempted interviews with memorythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 3, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250424120311
Mar 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not providing timely access to a resident's personal records.

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of conducting the initial investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by front desk staff after introducing himself and stating the purpose of the visit. Executive Director Fred Paoli was present and assisted with the visit after being presented with the allegation under review. During the visit, LPA requested and obtained the facility's current resident census, staff roster along with records maintained at the facility for resident R1. One staff interview conducted. CONTINUED ON FORM LIC9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250313134523
Mar 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is not providing care and supervision to residents Incontinence care is not being provided to residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to continue the investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the memory care unit and interviewed staff and residents as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as facility notes. Regarding the allegations that incontinence care is not being provided to residents and facility is not providing care and supervision to residents, the investigation revealed the following: Five out of five staff state incontinence care is provided at least every 2 hours and residents are not left soiled. All staff interviewed state no incidents of coming on shift and finding a resident soiled. Two out of five staff state instances of working with only one other person making care to residents difficult. LPA toured the memory care unit on two different occasions andthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 10, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250107103931
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations1typical 1
Substantiated complaints2typical 2
Total complaints8typical 7
State visits on file17typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2024.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202646120257812024220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2026 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (949) 489-3400

Is San Clemente Villas By The Sea licensed?

Yes — San Clemente Villas By The Sea is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Clemente (Orange County): California license #306006472, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 190 residents. State records list 16 inspection and complaint documents since 2024; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 9, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can San Clemente Villas By The Sea care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists San Clemente Villas By The Sea with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 190 AMBULATORY OF WHICH 120 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY AND 40 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20. DELAYED EGRESS APPROVED FOR MEMORYCARE. MGMT COMPANY SUNRISE SR LIVING MANAGEMENT INC EFFECTIVE 5/27/26.

How much does San Clemente Villas By The Sea cost?

California's public licensing record does not include San Clemente Villas By The Sea's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does San Clemente Villas By The Sea accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

San Clemente Villas By The Sea is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

85 of 190 beds occupied (45%) when the state visited on May 14, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for San Clemente Villas By The Sea?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 17 state visits and 16 dated documents since 2024 for San Clemente Villas By The Sea; 8 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 14, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

8 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure that residents are administered their medications as prescribed Staff mismanage residents' medications
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the memory care unit and interviewed staff as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as medication administration records (MAR). Regarding the allegations that staff do not ensure that residents are administered their medications as prescribed and staff mismanage residents' medications, the investigation revealed the following: LPA toured resident rooms and memory care unit on two different occasions and did not observe any medications in rooms or common areas. Four out of five staff deny finding medications lying around. One staff stated finding a medication in the dining room one time. LPA reviewed the MAR for five residents. All five MAR's have documented reasons for missed medications. ResiCDSS inspection report, May 14, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260421085522
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff member worked while under the influence of drugs, impairing their ability to provide adequate care and supervision, which presents a risk to residents in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the memory care unit and interviewed staff. Regarding the allegation that staff member worked while under the influence of drugs, impairing their ability to provide adequate care and supervision, which presents a risk to residents in care, the investigation revealed the following: Five out of five staff interviewed deny any knowledge of a staff being present under the influence. Five out of five staff deny any staff sleeping in the facility before their shift. Administrator indicates no knowledge as well and confirms there have been no write-ups or terminations for this type of behavior. Based on interviews conducted, LPA is unable to corroborate the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated,CDSS inspection report, May 14, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260420154329
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility gave resident another resident's psychotropic meds which resulted in hospitalization
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducte an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, the department reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as facility notes. Regarding the allegation that facility gave resident another resident's psychotropic meds which resulted in hospitalization, the investigation revealed the following: Facility self reported an incident on 09/04/2024 where Resident 1 (R1) was incorrectly given another resident's Seroquel, Risperidone, and Lorazapam. R1 was transferred to Mission Hospital for observation and remained admitted until 09/08/2024. Facility notes indicate Mission Hospital stated there were no adverse effects from the medication error. Staff 1 (S1) was provided a written warning from the facility. Review of records showed the staff had received medication training froCDSS inspection report, April 9, 2026 · control 22-AS-20240923110559
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not communicate changes in care to authorized representative Staff not providing records to the authorized representative
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. Long Term Care Ombudsman Patricia McKeon was present as well. During the visit, LPA interviewed Administrator as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as facility notes. Regarding the allegations that staff do not communicate changes in care to authorized representative and staff not providing records to the authorized representative, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) was re-assessed on 03/24/2026 and 04/01/2026 after two instances of elopement out of the facility in March 2026. Per physician reports dated 10/02/2022 and 03/24/2026, R1 is diagnosed with Mild Cognitive Impairment and unable to leave the facility unassisted. Both assessments were provided to responsible party and time stamps on documents confirCDSS inspection report, April 9, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260402125930

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is charging a resident for services not rendered
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents. Regarding the allegation that facility is charging a resident for services not rendered, the investigation revealed the following: Information reported to the department indicated Resident 1 (R1) is being charged for dressing assistance. LPA reviewed resident assessment dated 12/17/2024 which showed that the resident is not being charged for dressing. Resident and staff denied staff are assisting with dressing. Based on record review and interviews conducted, the allegation is deemed UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was left at the facilitCDSS inspection report, September 12, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250619121530
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff communicate in a language that residents are unable to understand Staff are mismanaging residents' medications
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to continue the investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the memory care unit and interviewed staff. Regarding the allegations that staff communicate in a language that residents are unable to understand and staff are mismanaging residents' medications, the investigation revealed the following: Facility Executive Director indicates staff are to speak to residents in a language they are able to understand. Most speak English to residents but Spanish speaking residents prefer the staff speak Spanish with them. Eight out of nine staff state residents are able to understand the staff and there is no issue with language. Staff 1 (S1) indicates the language barrier is directed at the staff and not the residents. LPA unsuccessfully attempted interviews with memoryCDSS inspection report, June 3, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250424120311
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not providing timely access to a resident's personal records.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of conducting the initial investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by front desk staff after introducing himself and stating the purpose of the visit. Executive Director Fred Paoli was present and assisted with the visit after being presented with the allegation under review. During the visit, LPA requested and obtained the facility's current resident census, staff roster along with records maintained at the facility for resident R1. One staff interview conducted. CONTINUED ON FORM LIC9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 18, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250313134523
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not providing care and supervision to residents Incontinence care is not being provided to residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to continue the investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the memory care unit and interviewed staff and residents as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as facility notes. Regarding the allegations that incontinence care is not being provided to residents and facility is not providing care and supervision to residents, the investigation revealed the following: Five out of five staff state incontinence care is provided at least every 2 hours and residents are not left soiled. All staff interviewed state no incidents of coming on shift and finding a resident soiled. Two out of five staff state instances of working with only one other person making care to residents difficult. LPA toured the memory care unit on two different occasions andCDSS inspection report, February 10, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250107103931

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 17 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
8
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
17
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(949) 489-3400
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run San Clemente Villas By The Sea? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.