Oakmont Of Fullerton is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fullerton, Orange County, California — state license #306006224, licensed for 152 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 18 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated May 15, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2022, the state has visited this home 19 times and filed 18 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on May 15, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”
The state's published file for this home includes 9 documents with transcribed findings, dated June 15, 2023 to May 15, 2026. 9 of the 9 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (7). 9 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 9 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
May 15, 2026Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not seek medical attention in a timely manner.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to deliver the findings of the complaint investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met Executive Director Maria Kauten and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, Department staff inspected the facility, interviewed staff, witnesses and reviewed records, including resident roster, staff roster, staff schedule, Resident 1’s (R1) physician’s report dated June 2, 2022, R1’s preplacement appraisal dated May 31, 2022, elopement risk assessment dated May 31, 2022, R1’s functional capabilities assessment, Oakmont fall management protocol, R1’s resident care notes dated November 30, 2022 to January 15, 2023, R1’s resident and services agreement dated June 3, 2022 and R1’s St. Jude Medical Records dated January 11, 2023 through January 26, 2023. The investigation into the allegation, facility did not seek medical attention in a timely manner, revealed the following. Substantithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2026 · control 22-AS-20230130171142
May 15, 2026Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not safeguard residents' cash resources
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rose Ruppert made an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint received in the Regional Office. LPA was greeted and granted entry by the Concierge at 2:30pm. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Maria Kauten and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA reviewed the following documents for Resident #1 (R1): The Lease Agreement, Durable Power of Attorney documents, Resident Information Sheet and Form, Physician's Report dated 2/25/2026, Preplacement Appraisal, and R1's most recent Care Plan dated 2/11/2025. LPA also obtained signed Inventory Sheet by R1 who stated they did not wish to inventory personal belongings. It was alleged that: Facility staff did not safeguard residents' cash resources. LPA reviewed R1's documentation. R1 moved in on February 28, 2023 and R1 did not wish to inventory personal items. R1 does not have neurocognitive impairment and preferred to stay in the apartment. R1 was able to ambulate (Continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260430160439
May 14, 2026Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Due to lack of supervision, resident fell and sustained injuries.
On May 14, 2026, at 12:15 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Edward Kim conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA met with Administrator (ADMIN) Maria Kauten and explained the purpose of today’s visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Kim conducted a tour of the facility. LPA Kim obtained and reviewed copies of the resident and staff rosters, and resident records which include the Physician’s Reports, Appraisal/Needs and Services Plans, and other pertinent records. LPA conducted interviews with one resident, three staff, and two witnesses. The investigation revealed the following: Continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260320131240
Feb 11, 2026Unfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff failed to respond in a timely manner. Facility instructed staff to withhold information from the Department
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced visit to investigate the complaint allegations listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by staff after introducing himself and stating the purpose of the visit. The complaint investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, residents, a witness, document review, and observations. Regarding allegation: Staff failed to respond in a timely manner. During interviews 10 of 11 individuals failed to provide any corroborating evidence or information. According to residents, facility staff are responsive. According to Resident 2 (R2) staff are quick. Resident 3 (R3) said the same thing, staff respond quickly. S3 said one time their pendant was pressed by accident, and the staff were at my door fast! During an interview with Staff 6 (S6) LPA observed the staff’s pager going off. S6 got on their walkie talkie and asked for someone to check on a resident. The staff member on the other end of the radio responded immedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 11, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260202151159
Jan 30, 2026Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff spoke inappropriately to resident in care
On January 30, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Edward Kim conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Maria Kauten and explained the purpose of today’s visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Kim conducted a tour at the facility. LPA Kim obtained and reviewed copies of the resident and staff rosters, resident records which include the Physician’s Reports, Appraisal/Needs and Services Plans, and other pertinent records for five staff. LPA Kim conducted interviews with seven residents, eight staff, and one witness. Allegation: Staff Spoke inappropriately to resident in care It is alleged that facility staff #1 (S1) verbally abused resident #1 (R1). Continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2026 · control 22-AS-20251107104044
Jan 30, 2026Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff handled resident in care in a rough manner. Staff did not provide clean linens to residents in care. Staff did not clean resident rooms.
On January 30, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Edward Kim conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Maria Kauten and explained the purpose of today’s visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Kim conducted a tour of the facility. LPA Kim obtained and reviewed copies of the resident and staff rosters, resident records which include the Physician’s Reports, Appraisal/Needs and Services Plans, and other pertinent records for five staff. LPA conducted interviews with seven residents and eight staff. Allegation: Staff handled resident in care in a rough manner. It is alleged that staff #1 (S1) and staff #2 (S2) are rough with a resident especially during their shower time. A resident is to be known to be screaming during their shower time. Continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2026 · control 22-AS-20251110103951
Jan 30, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jul 9, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident was severely dehydrated due to neglect Resident was severely malnutrition due to neglect Resident not changed timely Due to neglect, Resident received a fracture while in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cheyenne Ratajczak arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Executive Director (ED) Maria Kauten to deliver findings for the above complaint allegations. During the investigation, the department conducted interviews and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: ***Report continued on 9099-C*** Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 9, 2025 · control 22-AS-20230328105245
Mar 10, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 12, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 18, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 5, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 16, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is charging a deceased resident's family after belonging were retrieved
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Celine De Perio and Rose Ruppert conducted an unannounced 10-day visit to the facility for the complaint and to deliver the findings. LPAs explained the purpose of today's visit, and was greeted by Executive Director (ED) Maria Kauten. During the investigation, LPAs toured the physical plant of the facility, conducted interviews, and requested copies of pertinent records reviewed. It was alleged that facility is charging a deceased resident's family after belonging were retrieved.1 out of 1 staff interview conducted stated that resident (R1) passed away on January 28, 2024 and that the facility had accidentally charged the resident's family from February 1, 2024 to February 6, 2024. Upon the facility discovering that R1's family was getting charged, a reimbursement check to R1's family was issued on May 9, 2024 for the amount of $917.13 for the time frame of February 1, 2024 to February 6, 2024. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 16, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240507103000
Feb 1, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Oakmont Of Fullerton licensed?
Yes — Oakmont Of Fullerton is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fullerton (Orange County): California license #306006224, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 152 residents. State records list 18 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 15, 2026, was marked “Substantiated” by the state.
Can Oakmont Of Fullerton care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Oakmont Of Fullerton with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 152 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 8 MAY BE BEDRIDDENHOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15.
How much does Oakmont Of Fullerton cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Oakmont Of Fullerton's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Oakmont Of Fullerton accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Oakmont Of Fullerton is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.
Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
104 of 152 beds occupied (68%) when the state visited on May 15, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Oakmont Of Fullerton?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 19 state visits and 18 dated documents since 2022 for Oakmont Of Fullerton; 9 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 15, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2026
2025
2024
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 19 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(714) 869-1940Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Oakmont Of Fullerton? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.