Palms Retirement Center is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fullerton, Orange County, California — state license #306006071, licensed for 144 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 44 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated July 15, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

3 homes in view

Palms Retirement Center

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 144 residents · Fullerton, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306006071, held since 2022 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
312 N Roosevelt Ave · Fullerton, Orange County
Phone
(626) 353-4710
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 144 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 10 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 32 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 144 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 32 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 50 times and filed 44 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated July 15, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 15, 2026
Occupancy at the July 21, 2025 visit
109 of 144 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 17 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 5, 2022 to July 21, 2025. 17 of the 17 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unfounded” (7), “Unsubstantiated” (6). 17 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 17 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 35 of 44 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
202610 state visits · 10 documents
Jul 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 22, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 3, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 22, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 25, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 11, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202515 state visits · 16 documents
Dec 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not refund resident their money

This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned complaint allegation. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Khatera Bahadory, discussed the purpose of the inspection, and explained the allegation. The investigation into the allegation that facility did not refund resident their money revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed AD and residents, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, Resident #1’s (R1) Admission Agreement, and R1’s Billing Statement. CONTINUED Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 21, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250716163949
Jul 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility failed to provide an appropriate bed.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hanna Gough made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of investigating the above mentioned complaint allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry by staff. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Khatera Bahadory and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation into the allegation Facility failed to provide an appropriate bed revealed the following: LPA observed two pictures that were taken of box springs and mattresses stacked on top of each other with no bedding. LPA observed the resident census list with the shared room occupancies. The room where the mattresses were observed to be stacked has only one resident in care at this time. LPA observed a shared bedroom with one bed unoccupied and not currently being used by any residents. The unused bed was observed to have a bedframe and a box spring. LPA observed the single occupant residing in the room to have a bed, bedframe, box spring and clean linens. LPA observed other resident roomthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250709151002
Jul 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility failed to issue proper notification for rate increase

On July 15, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Samer Haddadin conducted an unannounced complaint investigation at the facility. Upon arrival, LPA Haddadin was greeted by Khatera Bahadory AD, who granted entry and was advised of the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, the analyst toured the premises, residents and staff and reviewed all pertinent facility records concerning the allegation The allegation under review stated that the facility failed to issue proper notification for a rate increase. The investigation revealed that on March 31, 2025, the facility provided R1 with a proper 60-day written notice of a rate increase, scheduled to take effect on June 1, 2025. During an interview with the LPA, R1 confirmed receipt of the notice. Based on observations, interviews, and the information gathered during the investigation, the preponderance of the evidence standard has not been met. Therefore, the allegation that the facility issued an unlawful eviction is deemed UNFOUNDthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 15, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250701132137
Jun 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure residents receive their mail correspondence unopened in a timely manner

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Celine Rodriguez conducted an unannounced 10-day visit to the facility for the complaint and to deliver the findings. LPA Rodriguez explained the purpose of today's visit, and was greeted by facility administrator (AD) Khatera Bahadory. During the investigation, LPA Rodriguez toured the physical plant of the facility, conducted interviews, and requested copies of pertinent records reviewed. It was alleged that staff do not ensure residents receive their mail correspondence unopened in a timely manner. LPA Rodriguez conducted a total of 8 resident interviews of which all 8 interviews did not corroborate with the allegation. LPA Rodriguez conducted a total of 2 staff interviews of which the 2 interviews did not corroborate with the allegation. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 9, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250606151149
May 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: - Staff are not giving resident's belongings to resident after resident left the facility

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Tea made an unannounced visit to conduct a complaint investigation. LPA Tea was greeted and granted entry by facility staff and explained the reason for the visit. Assistant Administrator (AA) Kathleen Tamondong and (ED) Khatera Bahadory arrived shortly to assist with the visit. The department received a complaint on May 15, 2025 and LPA Tea conducted the initial 10 day visit a week later on May 21, 2025. It was alleged that facility staff are not giving resident’s belonging to resident after resident left the facility. LPA Tea interviewed facility staff and collected pertinent documents such as staff and resident rosters, copies of Resident 1 (R1)’s file. The investigation determined the following: Report continued on LIC9099-C Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250515082023
Apr 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility staff does not administer medications as prescribed

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as medication administration record. Regarding the allegation that facility staff does not administer medications as prescribed, the investigation revealed the following: Per physician report dated 02/10/2025, Resident 1 (R1) is able to administer own medications and injections. Resident is diagnosed with Type 1 Diabetes and is prescribed insulin. Per medication administration record, R1 is administering own medications. Based on record review, the allegation is deemed unfounded, meaning the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted and a cthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250227101758
Mar 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unlawful Eviction

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced initial 10-Day complaint visit to initiate the investigation into the above allegation and to deliver the findings of the investigation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Administrator Assistant Kathleen Tamondong. LPA explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Ellen Barrientos arrived during the visit. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that Resident received an unlawful eviction. Regarding the allegation, the following was revealed: During the course of the interviews one of six individuals interviewed confirmed the allegation. During the course of the investigation LPA reviewed documents including the Palms Retirement Center Admission Agreement dated August 15, 2022 for Resident 1 (R1). Per Admission Agreement for R1 under Rate for Basic Services it states all charges for basic and optional services are subject to change upon 60 days written notice. LPAthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250318082211
Mar 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are mismanaging residents medication Staff did not ensure resident was seen by their own physician

On this Day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannoucned visit to conduct a complaint investigation.LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. The Department received a complaint on 03/20/2025 and the initial 10 day visit was conducted on 03/26/2025. During the visit LPA Mendivil interviewed staff and residents. LPA Mendivil obtained copies of physician report, needs and services, preapprasial, admission agreement. Regarding the allegations staff are mismanging residents medication and staff did not ensure resident was seen by their own physician, the invesitgation revealed the following: It was alleged the facility was mismanaging residents' medication. Per interviews with 6 out of 6 residents stated the facility provides their medications as prescribed. Per interviews with 4 out of 4 staff indicated they provide all resident medications as prescribed. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250320123519
Mar 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Facility staff is not acting to prevent a bed bug infestation

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Tea made an unannounced visit to conduct a complaint investigation. LPA Tea was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Assistant Administrator (AA) Kathleen Tamondong and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator (AD) Eleanor Barrientos arrived later to assist with the visit. The department received a complaint on February 14, 2025 and LPA Tea conducted the initial 10 day visit a week later on February 21, 2025. It was alleged that facility staff is not acting to prevent a bed bug infestation. LPA Tea interviewed facility staff and residents and collected pertinent documents such as staff and resident rosters, copies of Resident 1 (R1)’s file, and pest control maintenance paperwork and log. The investigation determined the following: Report continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 21, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250214164901
Jan 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are mismanaging residents' medication

An unannounced Complaint Investigation was conducted on this day regarding the allegation mentioned above by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez. LPA met with Interim Administrator John Garcia and Assistant Administrator Kathleen Tamondong During the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed Medication Administrator Records (MARs) for ten residents and interviewed staff. LPA observed discrepancies in five of ten records. Resident 1’s (R1’s) MAR indicated five routine medications are not currently being administered, and one of the five medications is completely out, and has been without a refill for three days. During today’s inspection, two of four PRN medication for R2 were observed to be without a refill. During review of R2’s medication, during initial complaint investigation conducted on January 28, 2025, three of four PRN medications were observed to be without a refill. Per R3’s MAR, routine medication was not administered on the morning of January 24th and 27th 20the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 29, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250121122441
20244 state visits · 5 documents
May 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is refusing to accept the resident back to the facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and resident as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as hospital discharge paperwork. Regarding the allegation that facility is refusing to accept the resident back to the facility, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) was sent out to to Chapman Global Medical Center on 03/15/2024 to be evaluated per physician. On 03/25/2024, Administrator assessed the resident and was concerned the resident was not ready to be released back to the facility due to ongoing behavioral issues. However, Administrator stated receiving the resident back into the facility on 03/26/2024 and accepted the hospital's discharge assessment. Administrator denies refusing to take ththe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 3, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240325145159
Mar 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate notice of rate change

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and resident as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as rate increase letter. Regarding the allegation that staff did not provide adequate notice of rate change, the investigation revealed the following: Facility staff indicate scanning a notice of rate change to Resident 1's (R1) responsible party on 11/20/2023 after receiving notification from Community Care Licensing of the SS1 rate change. Facility mailed an additional copy on 12/15/2023 for signature. Responsible party stated not receiving the first notice and receiving the second notice on 12/28/2023. Facility staff stated scanning the first notice directly from facility scanner and not from emathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 8, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240201121336
Feb 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20233 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 18, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 17, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: -Staff did not provide resident with facility rules and regulations in a timely manner -Facility has roaches

On today's date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosie Quiroz conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose to conduct additional interviews and deliver findings for complaint allegations listed above. LPA Quiroz was greeted by front desk receptionist and met with Administrator (AD Erin Rehbein and discussed purpose of today's visit. The 10 day visit was conducted on 6/05/2023 by LPA Quiroz. During the course of the investigation, LPA Quiroz conducted interviews with interviewees consisting of staff and residents. LPA Quiroz also conducted documentation review but not limited to resident roster, staff roster, Admission Agreements, Facility House Rules, Infection control Inservice records and Pest Control Invoices dated 3/09/2023, 3/23/2023, 4/20/2023 and 5/18/2023. Regarding the allegation " Staff did not provide resident with facility rules and regulations in a timely manner," the investigation revealed the following: Interview indicating “I did receive it, I had misplaced it, but Ithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230530102018
Oct 17, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: -Staff are not following infectious control plan

On today's date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosie Quiroz conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose to conduct additional interviews and deliver findings for complaint allegations listed above. LPA Quiroz was greeted by front desk receptionish and met with Administrator (AD) Erin Rehbein and discussed purpose of today's visit. The 10 day visit was conducted on 6/05/2023 by LPA Quiroz. During the course of the investigation, LPA Quiroz conducted interviews with interviewees consisting of staff and residents. LPA Quiroz also conducted documentation review but not limited to resident roster, staff roster, physician reports, identification forms and Infection Control Inservice Material and Inservice logs dated 4/14/2023 and 6/5/2023. Regarding the allegation " Staff are not following infectious control plan,” the investigation revealed the following: Seven of eight interviewees consisting of residents and staff denied the allegation indicating staff are following infectious controthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230531092156
Aug 22, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 1
Type B citations7typical 1
Substantiated complaints9typical 2
Total complaints27typical 7
State visits on file50typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2022.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026101002025151632024450202345020228812021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (626) 353-4710

Is Palms Retirement Center licensed?

Yes — Palms Retirement Center is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fullerton (Orange County): California license #306006071, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 144 residents. State records list 44 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated July 15, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Palms Retirement Center care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Palms Retirement Center with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 144 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 32 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10.

How much does Palms Retirement Center cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Palms Retirement Center's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Palms Retirement Center accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Palms Retirement Center through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Orange County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

109 of 144 beds occupied (76%) when the state visited on July 21, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Palms Retirement Center?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 50 state visits and 44 dated documents since 2021 for Palms Retirement Center; 17 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated July 21, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

17 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not refund resident their money
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned complaint allegation. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Khatera Bahadory, discussed the purpose of the inspection, and explained the allegation. The investigation into the allegation that facility did not refund resident their money revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed AD and residents, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, Resident #1’s (R1) Admission Agreement, and R1’s Billing Statement. CONTINUED SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 21, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250716163949
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to provide an appropriate bed.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hanna Gough made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of investigating the above mentioned complaint allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry by staff. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Khatera Bahadory and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation into the allegation Facility failed to provide an appropriate bed revealed the following: LPA observed two pictures that were taken of box springs and mattresses stacked on top of each other with no bedding. LPA observed the resident census list with the shared room occupancies. The room where the mattresses were observed to be stacked has only one resident in care at this time. LPA observed a shared bedroom with one bed unoccupied and not currently being used by any residents. The unused bed was observed to have a bedframe and a box spring. LPA observed the single occupant residing in the room to have a bed, bedframe, box spring and clean linens. LPA observed other resident roomCDSS inspection report, July 18, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250709151002
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to issue proper notification for rate increase
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On July 15, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Samer Haddadin conducted an unannounced complaint investigation at the facility. Upon arrival, LPA Haddadin was greeted by Khatera Bahadory AD, who granted entry and was advised of the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, the analyst toured the premises, residents and staff and reviewed all pertinent facility records concerning the allegation The allegation under review stated that the facility failed to issue proper notification for a rate increase. The investigation revealed that on March 31, 2025, the facility provided R1 with a proper 60-day written notice of a rate increase, scheduled to take effect on June 1, 2025. During an interview with the LPA, R1 confirmed receipt of the notice. Based on observations, interviews, and the information gathered during the investigation, the preponderance of the evidence standard has not been met. Therefore, the allegation that the facility issued an unlawful eviction is deemed UNFOUNDCDSS inspection report, July 15, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250701132137
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure residents receive their mail correspondence unopened in a timely manner
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Celine Rodriguez conducted an unannounced 10-day visit to the facility for the complaint and to deliver the findings. LPA Rodriguez explained the purpose of today's visit, and was greeted by facility administrator (AD) Khatera Bahadory. During the investigation, LPA Rodriguez toured the physical plant of the facility, conducted interviews, and requested copies of pertinent records reviewed. It was alleged that staff do not ensure residents receive their mail correspondence unopened in a timely manner. LPA Rodriguez conducted a total of 8 resident interviews of which all 8 interviews did not corroborate with the allegation. LPA Rodriguez conducted a total of 2 staff interviews of which the 2 interviews did not corroborate with the allegation. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, June 9, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250606151149
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewed- Staff are not giving resident's belongings to resident after resident left the facility
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Tea made an unannounced visit to conduct a complaint investigation. LPA Tea was greeted and granted entry by facility staff and explained the reason for the visit. Assistant Administrator (AA) Kathleen Tamondong and (ED) Khatera Bahadory arrived shortly to assist with the visit. The department received a complaint on May 15, 2025 and LPA Tea conducted the initial 10 day visit a week later on May 21, 2025. It was alleged that facility staff are not giving resident’s belonging to resident after resident left the facility. LPA Tea interviewed facility staff and collected pertinent documents such as staff and resident rosters, copies of Resident 1 (R1)’s file. The investigation determined the following: Report continued on LIC9099-C UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, May 21, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250515082023
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff does not administer medications as prescribed
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as medication administration record. Regarding the allegation that facility staff does not administer medications as prescribed, the investigation revealed the following: Per physician report dated 02/10/2025, Resident 1 (R1) is able to administer own medications and injections. Resident is diagnosed with Type 1 Diabetes and is prescribed insulin. Per medication administration record, R1 is administering own medications. Based on record review, the allegation is deemed unfounded, meaning the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted and a cCDSS inspection report, April 9, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250227101758
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnlawful Eviction
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced initial 10-Day complaint visit to initiate the investigation into the above allegation and to deliver the findings of the investigation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Administrator Assistant Kathleen Tamondong. LPA explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Ellen Barrientos arrived during the visit. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that Resident received an unlawful eviction. Regarding the allegation, the following was revealed: During the course of the interviews one of six individuals interviewed confirmed the allegation. During the course of the investigation LPA reviewed documents including the Palms Retirement Center Admission Agreement dated August 15, 2022 for Resident 1 (R1). Per Admission Agreement for R1 under Rate for Basic Services it states all charges for basic and optional services are subject to change upon 60 days written notice. LPACDSS inspection report, March 27, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250318082211
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are mismanaging residents medication Staff did not ensure resident was seen by their own physician
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this Day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannoucned visit to conduct a complaint investigation.LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. The Department received a complaint on 03/20/2025 and the initial 10 day visit was conducted on 03/26/2025. During the visit LPA Mendivil interviewed staff and residents. LPA Mendivil obtained copies of physician report, needs and services, preapprasial, admission agreement. Regarding the allegations staff are mismanging residents medication and staff did not ensure resident was seen by their own physician, the invesitgation revealed the following: It was alleged the facility was mismanaging residents' medication. Per interviews with 6 out of 6 residents stated the facility provides their medications as prescribed. Per interviews with 4 out of 4 staff indicated they provide all resident medications as prescribed. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 26, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250320123519
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Facility staff is not acting to prevent a bed bug infestation
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Tea made an unannounced visit to conduct a complaint investigation. LPA Tea was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Assistant Administrator (AA) Kathleen Tamondong and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator (AD) Eleanor Barrientos arrived later to assist with the visit. The department received a complaint on February 14, 2025 and LPA Tea conducted the initial 10 day visit a week later on February 21, 2025. It was alleged that facility staff is not acting to prevent a bed bug infestation. LPA Tea interviewed facility staff and residents and collected pertinent documents such as staff and resident rosters, copies of Resident 1 (R1)’s file, and pest control maintenance paperwork and log. The investigation determined the following: Report continued on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 21, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250214164901
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are mismanaging residents' medication
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
An unannounced Complaint Investigation was conducted on this day regarding the allegation mentioned above by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez. LPA met with Interim Administrator John Garcia and Assistant Administrator Kathleen Tamondong During the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed Medication Administrator Records (MARs) for ten residents and interviewed staff. LPA observed discrepancies in five of ten records. Resident 1’s (R1’s) MAR indicated five routine medications are not currently being administered, and one of the five medications is completely out, and has been without a refill for three days. During today’s inspection, two of four PRN medication for R2 were observed to be without a refill. During review of R2’s medication, during initial complaint investigation conducted on January 28, 2025, three of four PRN medications were observed to be without a refill. Per R3’s MAR, routine medication was not administered on the morning of January 24th and 27th 20CDSS inspection report, January 29, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250121122441

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is refusing to accept the resident back to the facility
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and resident as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as hospital discharge paperwork. Regarding the allegation that facility is refusing to accept the resident back to the facility, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) was sent out to to Chapman Global Medical Center on 03/15/2024 to be evaluated per physician. On 03/25/2024, Administrator assessed the resident and was concerned the resident was not ready to be released back to the facility due to ongoing behavioral issues. However, Administrator stated receiving the resident back into the facility on 03/26/2024 and accepted the hospital's discharge assessment. Administrator denies refusing to take thCDSS inspection report, April 3, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240325145159
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide adequate notice of rate change
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and resident as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as rate increase letter. Regarding the allegation that staff did not provide adequate notice of rate change, the investigation revealed the following: Facility staff indicate scanning a notice of rate change to Resident 1's (R1) responsible party on 11/20/2023 after receiving notification from Community Care Licensing of the SS1 rate change. Facility mailed an additional copy on 12/15/2023 for signature. Responsible party stated not receiving the first notice and receiving the second notice on 12/28/2023. Facility staff stated scanning the first notice directly from facility scanner and not from emaCDSS inspection report, February 8, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240201121336

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewed-Staff did not provide resident with facility rules and regulations in a timely manner -Facility has roaches
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On today's date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosie Quiroz conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose to conduct additional interviews and deliver findings for complaint allegations listed above. LPA Quiroz was greeted by front desk receptionist and met with Administrator (AD Erin Rehbein and discussed purpose of today's visit. The 10 day visit was conducted on 6/05/2023 by LPA Quiroz. During the course of the investigation, LPA Quiroz conducted interviews with interviewees consisting of staff and residents. LPA Quiroz also conducted documentation review but not limited to resident roster, staff roster, Admission Agreements, Facility House Rules, Infection control Inservice records and Pest Control Invoices dated 3/09/2023, 3/23/2023, 4/20/2023 and 5/18/2023. Regarding the allegation " Staff did not provide resident with facility rules and regulations in a timely manner," the investigation revealed the following: Interview indicating “I did receive it, I had misplaced it, but ICDSS inspection report, October 17, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230530102018
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewed-Staff are not following infectious control plan
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On today's date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosie Quiroz conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose to conduct additional interviews and deliver findings for complaint allegations listed above. LPA Quiroz was greeted by front desk receptionish and met with Administrator (AD) Erin Rehbein and discussed purpose of today's visit. The 10 day visit was conducted on 6/05/2023 by LPA Quiroz. During the course of the investigation, LPA Quiroz conducted interviews with interviewees consisting of staff and residents. LPA Quiroz also conducted documentation review but not limited to resident roster, staff roster, physician reports, identification forms and Infection Control Inservice Material and Inservice logs dated 4/14/2023 and 6/5/2023. Regarding the allegation " Staff are not following infectious control plan,” the investigation revealed the following: Seven of eight interviewees consisting of residents and staff denied the allegation indicating staff are following infectious controCDSS inspection report, October 17, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230531092156
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was raped by another resident. Staff does not provide adequate supervision. Facility has vermin.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jenifer Tirre met with Assistant Administrator Kathleen Tamondong for the purpose of delivering the findings for the above allegations. The investigation consisted of interviews conducted and medical records obtained. On 04/05/2022, the department received allegations that Resident was raped by another resident, Facility Staff does not provide adequate supervision, and Facility has vermin. The investigation was completed by the Department and revealed the following: On 4/04/2022 Resident 1 (R1) was transported to the hospital due to R1 complaining of vaginal pain and discomfort. At the time of incident, R1 reported to facility staff that an unknown male had been “all up in that” while pointing to her genitals. It was reported to Administrator Katherine Trevino by Staff (S1) that blood was discharged on R1’s undergarments. Interviews conducted and Medical Records revealed that R1 was diagnosed with a Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). Medical RecoCDSS inspection report, July 5, 2023 · control 22-AS-20220405132859

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 50 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
7
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
9
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
27
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
50
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(626) 353-4710
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Palms Retirement Center? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.