Ivy Park At Mission Viejo is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Mission Viejo, Orange County, California — state license #306005351, licensed for 150 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 20 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 20, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

6 homes in view

Ivy Park At Mission Viejo

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 150 residents · Mission Viejo, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospice not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306005351, held since 2018 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
27783 Center Drive · Mission Viejo, Orange County
Phone
(949) 364-6210
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 142 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER, 142 NON-AMBULATORY, 8 BED RIDDEN IN ROOMS 102, 104, 139, 144 BLDG A AND 4 AND 6 IN BLDG B. NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY, OAKMONT MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC. EFFECTIVE 07/01/22.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 22 times and filed 20 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on May 20, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
May 20, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
116 of 150 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 10 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 14, 2021 to May 20, 2026. 10 of the 10 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (6). 10 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 10 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 11 of 20 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
May 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff failed to provide adequate treatment after a resident sustained a burn on the premises. Facility staff did not provide adequate measures to ensure resident did not sustain a burn while in care.

** This report was amended due to typographical error"" On May 20, 2026, at 9:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Edward Kim conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA met with Administrator (ADMIN) Foudhil Manadi and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following. LPA Kim toured the facility with ADMIN Manadi. LPA requested and obtained copies of the resident roster and staff roster. LPA Kim reviewed and obtained copies of R1-R6s records, which include Admission Agreement, Identification and Emergency Information, home health notes, physician's reports, pre-appraisals, reappraisals, progress notes, and other pertinent documents. The investigation revealed the following: Continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2026 · control 22-AS-20250519154715
Apr 6, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not treat residents with dignity and respect. Staff does not assist residents with toileting. Residents' hygiene needs are not being met. Facility does not have adequate staffing to meet residents' needs.

On April 6, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jessica Cho made an unannounced visit for the purpose of continuing the investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Business Officer Director (BOD) Joan Shattler and stated the reason for the visit. On January 12, 2024, the Department received the complaint. The complaint investigation was initiated on January 18, 2024. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted a walk through of the memory care unit and successfully interviewed six of seven residents since one resident was preoccupied at the time of the interview. LPA also interviewed three staff and obtained the following resident documentation for review: Resident Rosters, Personnel Reports, Face Sheets with photos, Medical Assessments (LIC 602s), and Individualized Service Plans (ISPs). The following was determined: Regarding the allegation, Staff does not treat residents with dignity and respect, it is alleged that the caregivers laughed instead of helping a mthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 6, 2026 · control 22-AS-20240112171918
Mar 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Jun 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is providing an unknown medication causing residents to choke. Staff harasses resident. Staff did not inform responsible party of incident.

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of following up on the investigation of the allegations listed above as well as to deliver findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Executive Director Foudil Manadi after stating the purpose of the visit. The initial investigation visit took place on May 1, 2025. During the visit, LPA requested and obtained the facility's current resident census, the employee roster as well as resident records for a total of five currently admitted residents, including their physician reports and charting notes. A tour of the assisted living medication room was conducted along with a review of the centrally stored medication and medication administration records. Two staff interviews and one resident interview also took place. Four additional staff interviews were conducted during the follow-up visit. CONTINUED ON FORM LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 16, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250425081047
Mar 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20245 state visits · 6 documents
Aug 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility did not provide records to authorized representative

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed Administrator as well as reviewed email string. Regarding the allegation that facility did not provide records to authorized representative, the investigation revealed the following: Facility received request for records for Resident 1 (R1) on Friday, July 5, 2024. Records were sent to authorized representative in the afternoon on Monday, July 8, 2024. Law firm confirms receipt of records on July 8, 2024. Health and Safety Code requires records to be "provided promptly and not to exceed 2 business days". Facility adhered to the regulatory turn around time. Therefore the allegation is deemed unfounded, meaning the allegation is false could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exitthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 1, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240729154235
Jun 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Lack of staff.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez made an unannounced visit to conduct the required 10 day visit to begin the investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Foudhil Manadi, Executive Director, and explained the reason for the visit. Based on the information obtained during this investigation the department has concluded the investigation into the above mentioned allegation. Findings are based upon this investigation which included interviews conducted, tour of the memory care unit and copies of pertinent documents obtained. It is alleged that the facility has a lack of staff in the memory care unit. Records review revealed that at the time of visit the facility census is 105 of that census the memory care units census is 34. The facility roster reflects that the facility has a total of 48 caregivers on board. 24 caregivers are assigned to the memory care unit and an additional 2 Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 4, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240529163033
May 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as hospital discharge paperwork. Regarding the allegation that facility staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident, the investigation revealed the following: Facility notes dated 03/22/2024 indicate Resident 1 (R1) was being seen by Nurse Practitioner and started antibiotics and prednisone for coughing/ congestion. Resident was receiving breathing treatments along with medication management as indicated on facility documents. Facility documents indicate R1 was non-compliant with treatments as well. On 03/29/2024, 911 was called due to resident wheezing and difficulty breathing. Resident was admitted to Providence Missithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 6, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240502140416
May 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 27, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not issue a proper eviction notice to resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and resident as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as eviction notice and facility notes. Regarding the allegation that staff did not issue a proper eviction notice to resident in care, the investigation revealed the following: On 06/08/2023, Resident 1 (R1) was provided a "Letter of Concern" by facility administrator. The letter was to address an incident of a narcotic being stored in the resident's room as well as inappropriate touching of staff members. The letter provided the verbiage from house rules that were being violated. On 02/05/2024, R1 was provided a 30 day eviction notice outlining multiple instances of inappropriate behavior towards staff. Per admission athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240222131129
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints1typical 2
Total complaints10typical 7
State visits on file22typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2018.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202633020252202024560202311020227702021221
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (949) 364-6210

Is Ivy Park At Mission Viejo licensed?

Yes — Ivy Park At Mission Viejo is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Mission Viejo (Orange County): California license #306005351, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 150 residents. State records list 20 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 20, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Ivy Park At Mission Viejo care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Ivy Park At Mission Viejo with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and dementia / memory care; it does not list hospice care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER, 142 NON-AMBULATORY, 8 BED RIDDEN IN ROOMS 102, 104, 139, 144 BLDG A AND 4 AND 6 IN BLDG B. NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY, OAKMONT MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC. EFFECTIVE 07/01/22.

How much does Ivy Park At Mission Viejo cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Ivy Park At Mission Viejo's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Ivy Park At Mission Viejo accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Ivy Park At Mission Viejo is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

116 of 150 beds occupied (77%) when the state visited on May 20, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Ivy Park At Mission Viejo?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 22 state visits and 20 dated documents since 2021 for Ivy Park At Mission Viejo; 10 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 20, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

10 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff failed to provide adequate treatment after a resident sustained a burn on the premises. Facility staff did not provide adequate measures to ensure resident did not sustain a burn while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
** This report was amended due to typographical error"" On May 20, 2026, at 9:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Edward Kim conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA met with Administrator (ADMIN) Foudhil Manadi and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following. LPA Kim toured the facility with ADMIN Manadi. LPA requested and obtained copies of the resident roster and staff roster. LPA Kim reviewed and obtained copies of R1-R6s records, which include Admission Agreement, Identification and Emergency Information, home health notes, physician's reports, pre-appraisals, reappraisals, progress notes, and other pertinent documents. The investigation revealed the following: Continued on LIC9099C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 20, 2026 · control 22-AS-20250519154715
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not treat residents with dignity and respect. Staff does not assist residents with toileting. Residents' hygiene needs are not being met. Facility does not have adequate staffing to meet residents' needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On April 6, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jessica Cho made an unannounced visit for the purpose of continuing the investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Business Officer Director (BOD) Joan Shattler and stated the reason for the visit. On January 12, 2024, the Department received the complaint. The complaint investigation was initiated on January 18, 2024. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted a walk through of the memory care unit and successfully interviewed six of seven residents since one resident was preoccupied at the time of the interview. LPA also interviewed three staff and obtained the following resident documentation for review: Resident Rosters, Personnel Reports, Face Sheets with photos, Medical Assessments (LIC 602s), and Individualized Service Plans (ISPs). The following was determined: Regarding the allegation, Staff does not treat residents with dignity and respect, it is alleged that the caregivers laughed instead of helping a mCDSS inspection report, April 6, 2026 · control 22-AS-20240112171918

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is providing an unknown medication causing residents to choke. Staff harasses resident. Staff did not inform responsible party of incident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of following up on the investigation of the allegations listed above as well as to deliver findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Executive Director Foudil Manadi after stating the purpose of the visit. The initial investigation visit took place on May 1, 2025. During the visit, LPA requested and obtained the facility's current resident census, the employee roster as well as resident records for a total of five currently admitted residents, including their physician reports and charting notes. A tour of the assisted living medication room was conducted along with a review of the centrally stored medication and medication administration records. Two staff interviews and one resident interview also took place. Four additional staff interviews were conducted during the follow-up visit. CONTINUED ON FORM LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 16, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250425081047

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not provide records to authorized representative
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed Administrator as well as reviewed email string. Regarding the allegation that facility did not provide records to authorized representative, the investigation revealed the following: Facility received request for records for Resident 1 (R1) on Friday, July 5, 2024. Records were sent to authorized representative in the afternoon on Monday, July 8, 2024. Law firm confirms receipt of records on July 8, 2024. Health and Safety Code requires records to be "provided promptly and not to exceed 2 business days". Facility adhered to the regulatory turn around time. Therefore the allegation is deemed unfounded, meaning the allegation is false could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. ExitCDSS inspection report, August 1, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240729154235
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLack of staff.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez made an unannounced visit to conduct the required 10 day visit to begin the investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Foudhil Manadi, Executive Director, and explained the reason for the visit. Based on the information obtained during this investigation the department has concluded the investigation into the above mentioned allegation. Findings are based upon this investigation which included interviews conducted, tour of the memory care unit and copies of pertinent documents obtained. It is alleged that the facility has a lack of staff in the memory care unit. Records review revealed that at the time of visit the facility census is 105 of that census the memory care units census is 34. The facility roster reflects that the facility has a total of 48 caregivers on board. 24 caregivers are assigned to the memory care unit and an additional 2 Continued on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 4, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240529163033
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as hospital discharge paperwork. Regarding the allegation that facility staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident, the investigation revealed the following: Facility notes dated 03/22/2024 indicate Resident 1 (R1) was being seen by Nurse Practitioner and started antibiotics and prednisone for coughing/ congestion. Resident was receiving breathing treatments along with medication management as indicated on facility documents. Facility documents indicate R1 was non-compliant with treatments as well. On 03/29/2024, 911 was called due to resident wheezing and difficulty breathing. Resident was admitted to Providence MissiCDSS inspection report, May 6, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240502140416
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not issue a proper eviction notice to resident in care
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and resident as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as eviction notice and facility notes. Regarding the allegation that staff did not issue a proper eviction notice to resident in care, the investigation revealed the following: On 06/08/2023, Resident 1 (R1) was provided a "Letter of Concern" by facility administrator. The letter was to address an incident of a narcotic being stored in the resident's room as well as inappropriate touching of staff members. The letter provided the verbiage from house rules that were being violated. On 02/05/2024, R1 was provided a 30 day eviction notice outlining multiple instances of inappropriate behavior towards staff. Per admission aCDSS inspection report, February 27, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240222131129

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 22 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
10
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
22
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(949) 364-6210
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Ivy Park At Mission Viejo? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.