Ivy Park At Mission Viejo is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Mission Viejo, Orange County, California — state license #306005351, licensed for 150 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 20 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 20, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2021, the state has visited this home 22 times and filed 20 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on May 20, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”
The state's published file for this home includes 10 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 14, 2021 to May 20, 2026. 10 of the 10 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (6). 10 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 10 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
May 20, 2026Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff failed to provide adequate treatment after a resident sustained a burn on the premises. Facility staff did not provide adequate measures to ensure resident did not sustain a burn while in care.
** This report was amended due to typographical error"" On May 20, 2026, at 9:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Edward Kim conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA met with Administrator (ADMIN) Foudhil Manadi and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following. LPA Kim toured the facility with ADMIN Manadi. LPA requested and obtained copies of the resident roster and staff roster. LPA Kim reviewed and obtained copies of R1-R6s records, which include Admission Agreement, Identification and Emergency Information, home health notes, physician's reports, pre-appraisals, reappraisals, progress notes, and other pertinent documents. The investigation revealed the following: Continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2026 · control 22-AS-20250519154715
Apr 6, 2026Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff does not treat residents with dignity and respect. Staff does not assist residents with toileting. Residents' hygiene needs are not being met. Facility does not have adequate staffing to meet residents' needs.
On April 6, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jessica Cho made an unannounced visit for the purpose of continuing the investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Business Officer Director (BOD) Joan Shattler and stated the reason for the visit. On January 12, 2024, the Department received the complaint. The complaint investigation was initiated on January 18, 2024. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted a walk through of the memory care unit and successfully interviewed six of seven residents since one resident was preoccupied at the time of the interview. LPA also interviewed three staff and obtained the following resident documentation for review: Resident Rosters, Personnel Reports, Face Sheets with photos, Medical Assessments (LIC 602s), and Individualized Service Plans (ISPs). The following was determined: Regarding the allegation, Staff does not treat residents with dignity and respect, it is alleged that the caregivers laughed instead of helping a mthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 6, 2026 · control 22-AS-20240112171918
Mar 26, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 16, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff is providing an unknown medication causing residents to choke. Staff harasses resident. Staff did not inform responsible party of incident.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of following up on the investigation of the allegations listed above as well as to deliver findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Executive Director Foudil Manadi after stating the purpose of the visit. The initial investigation visit took place on May 1, 2025. During the visit, LPA requested and obtained the facility's current resident census, the employee roster as well as resident records for a total of five currently admitted residents, including their physician reports and charting notes. A tour of the assisted living medication room was conducted along with a review of the centrally stored medication and medication administration records. Two staff interviews and one resident interview also took place. Four additional staff interviews were conducted during the follow-up visit. CONTINUED ON FORM LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 16, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250425081047
Mar 19, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Aug 1, 2024Unfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility did not provide records to authorized representative
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed Administrator as well as reviewed email string. Regarding the allegation that facility did not provide records to authorized representative, the investigation revealed the following: Facility received request for records for Resident 1 (R1) on Friday, July 5, 2024. Records were sent to authorized representative in the afternoon on Monday, July 8, 2024. Law firm confirms receipt of records on July 8, 2024. Health and Safety Code requires records to be "provided promptly and not to exceed 2 business days". Facility adhered to the regulatory turn around time. Therefore the allegation is deemed unfounded, meaning the allegation is false could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exitthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 1, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240729154235
Jun 4, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Lack of staff.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez made an unannounced visit to conduct the required 10 day visit to begin the investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Foudhil Manadi, Executive Director, and explained the reason for the visit. Based on the information obtained during this investigation the department has concluded the investigation into the above mentioned allegation. Findings are based upon this investigation which included interviews conducted, tour of the memory care unit and copies of pertinent documents obtained. It is alleged that the facility has a lack of staff in the memory care unit. Records review revealed that at the time of visit the facility census is 105 of that census the memory care units census is 34. The facility roster reflects that the facility has a total of 48 caregivers on board. 24 caregivers are assigned to the memory care unit and an additional 2 Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 4, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240529163033
May 6, 2024Unfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as hospital discharge paperwork. Regarding the allegation that facility staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident, the investigation revealed the following: Facility notes dated 03/22/2024 indicate Resident 1 (R1) was being seen by Nurse Practitioner and started antibiotics and prednisone for coughing/ congestion. Resident was receiving breathing treatments along with medication management as indicated on facility documents. Facility documents indicate R1 was non-compliant with treatments as well. On 03/29/2024, 911 was called due to resident wheezing and difficulty breathing. Resident was admitted to Providence Missithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 6, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240502140416
May 6, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Apr 25, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 27, 2024Unfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff did not issue a proper eviction notice to resident in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and resident as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as eviction notice and facility notes. Regarding the allegation that staff did not issue a proper eviction notice to resident in care, the investigation revealed the following: On 06/08/2023, Resident 1 (R1) was provided a "Letter of Concern" by facility administrator. The letter was to address an incident of a narcotic being stored in the resident's room as well as inappropriate touching of staff members. The letter provided the verbiage from house rules that were being violated. On 02/05/2024, R1 was provided a 30 day eviction notice outlining multiple instances of inappropriate behavior towards staff. Per admission athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240222131129
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Ivy Park At Mission Viejo licensed?
Yes — Ivy Park At Mission Viejo is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Mission Viejo (Orange County): California license #306005351, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 150 residents. State records list 20 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 20, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.
Can Ivy Park At Mission Viejo care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Ivy Park At Mission Viejo with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and dementia / memory care; it does not list hospice care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER, 142 NON-AMBULATORY, 8 BED RIDDEN IN ROOMS 102, 104, 139, 144 BLDG A AND 4 AND 6 IN BLDG B. NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY, OAKMONT MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC. EFFECTIVE 07/01/22.
How much does Ivy Park At Mission Viejo cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Ivy Park At Mission Viejo's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Ivy Park At Mission Viejo accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Ivy Park At Mission Viejo is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.
Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
116 of 150 beds occupied (77%) when the state visited on May 20, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Ivy Park At Mission Viejo?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 22 state visits and 20 dated documents since 2021 for Ivy Park At Mission Viejo; 10 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 20, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2026
2025
2024
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 22 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(949) 364-6210Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Ivy Park At Mission Viejo? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.