Brookdale Nohl Ranch is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Anaheim Hills, Orange County, California — state license #306002955, licensed for 266 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 15 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated December 9, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

8 homes in view

Brookdale Nohl Ranch

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 266 residents · Anaheim Hills, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306002955, held since 2005 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
380 S Anaheim Hills Rd · Anaheim Hills, Orange County
Phone
(714) 974-1616
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 164 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 25 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
164 NON-AMBULATORY, HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 25State service designation985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 15 times and filed 15 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on December 9, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
June 16, 2026
Occupancy at the December 9, 2025 visit
105 of 266 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 8 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 20, 2021 to December 9, 2025. 8 of the 8 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (5). 8 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 8 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 9 of 15 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20254 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure resident took medication as prescribed Staff retaliated against resident for exercising their rights

On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jenifer Tirre made a subsequent visit for complaint investigation. LPA Tirre stated purpose of visit and met with Executive Director Sarah Devore. The investigation consisted of staff and resident interviews and review of Resident 1’s (R1) facility records. The Investigation was completed by department and revealed the following: On November 20, 2025, the department received allegations that Staff did not ensure resident took medication as prescribed and Staff retaliated against resident for exercising their rights. Regarding the allegation staff did not ensure resident took medication as prescribed, interviews were conducted with staff and residents, the following information was provided: Eight of eight staff members interviewed stated that residents received assistance with their medications from Medication certified staff such as Medication Technicians, Clinical Nurse, Resident Care Coordinator and additional care staff that are certifiedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 9, 2025 · control 22-AS-20251120151058
Dec 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff verbally abuses residents Resident wandered away from the facility due to lack of supervision Resident sustained a fall while in care and staff did not assist resident in a timely manner Resident was left outside the facility for extended periods Facility is in disrepair Facility has mold Residents’ rooms are not being cleaned properly Facility has an outbreak of flu due to unsanitary conditions of the facility Staff did not prevent resident from being harmed by other residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Celine Rodriguez conducted a continuation visit to the facility for the complaint and to deliver the findings. LPA Rodriguez explained the purpose of today's visit and was greeted by Executive Director (ED) - Sarah Devore and Resident Care Coordinator (RCC) - Kim Bennett. It was alleged that staff verbally abuses residents. LPA Rodriguez conducted a total of 7 resident interviews of which all 7 interviews did not corroborate with the allegation by stating that staff are nice, helpful, and denied of being a victim of verbal abuse or witnessing it. LPA Rodriguez conducted a total of 3 staff interviews of which all 3 interviews did not corroborate with the allegation. Per staff interviews, staff are required to complete a training on abuse prior to taking care of residents and are not allowed to be on the floor until training is completed. Per record review, LPA Rodriguez observed that all staff have completed abuse training, resident rights, and how to carthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 18, 2025 · control 22-AS-20240227140230
Jan 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not administer prescribed medication to a resident in care. Staff is smoking a vape pen inside of the facility. Staff did not properly bathe a resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegations received on July 03, 2024. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Executive Director (ED) Sarah DeVore. LPA explained the reason for the visit. This Department has investigated the complaint alleging that staff did not administer prescribed medication to a resident in care, staff is smoking a vape pen inside of the facility and staff did not properly bathe a resident in care. Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on February 28, 2024. Regarding the allegations, the following was revealed: During the course of the interviews six of seven individuals interviewed denied the allegations. During the course of the investigation LPA reviewed documents including the Physician Report (LIC602A) dated March 15, 2024 for R1. Per Physician Report R1 is able to administer own prescription medications. During the course of the interviews withthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 30, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240703101647
Oct 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not cleaning facility properly.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jessica Cho made a subsequent unannounced visit to deliver the findings into the above allegation. LPA met with Operations Specialist (OS) Tierny Wilburn and stated the purpose of the visit after reviewing the allegation. During the initial complaint inspection conducted on January 31, 2024, between 3:05pm to 5:00pm, the following were observed: LPA and OS Wilburn toured and inspected all common areas on levels 1-3. There are no common areas on levels 4-5. There is a strong odor lingering in the lobby past the living room and by the north elevator. The odor was still present on today's date as well. Food particles and dust have accumulated below the dining tables, and the floor was sticky. The floor of the north/south elevator were sticky and had a strong smell of urine inside the north elevator. The floor in the four bathrooms located on the first floor were sticky and had a smell of urine. LPA and OS Wilburn observed two full trash bags in front of unithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 9, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240126094209
20231 state visit · 1 document
Sep 21, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints2typical 2
Total complaints8typical 7
State visits on file15typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2005.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20254502024331202311020222212021340
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2024 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (714) 974-1616

Is Brookdale Nohl Ranch licensed?

Yes — Brookdale Nohl Ranch is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Anaheim Hills (Orange County): California license #306002955, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 266 residents. State records list 15 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated December 9, 2025, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Brookdale Nohl Ranch care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Brookdale Nohl Ranch with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record164 NON-AMBULATORY, HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 25

How much does Brookdale Nohl Ranch cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Brookdale Nohl Ranch's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Brookdale Nohl Ranch accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Brookdale Nohl Ranch is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

105 of 266 beds occupied (39%) when the state visited on December 9, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Brookdale Nohl Ranch?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 15 state visits and 15 dated documents since 2021 for Brookdale Nohl Ranch; 8 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 9, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

8 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure resident took medication as prescribed Staff retaliated against resident for exercising their rights
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jenifer Tirre made a subsequent visit for complaint investigation. LPA Tirre stated purpose of visit and met with Executive Director Sarah Devore. The investigation consisted of staff and resident interviews and review of Resident 1’s (R1) facility records. The Investigation was completed by department and revealed the following: On November 20, 2025, the department received allegations that Staff did not ensure resident took medication as prescribed and Staff retaliated against resident for exercising their rights. Regarding the allegation staff did not ensure resident took medication as prescribed, interviews were conducted with staff and residents, the following information was provided: Eight of eight staff members interviewed stated that residents received assistance with their medications from Medication certified staff such as Medication Technicians, Clinical Nurse, Resident Care Coordinator and additional care staff that are certifiedCDSS inspection report, December 9, 2025 · control 22-AS-20251120151058
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff verbally abuses residents Resident wandered away from the facility due to lack of supervision Resident sustained a fall while in care and staff did not assist resident in a timely manner Resident was left outside the facility for extended periods Facility is in disrepair Facility has mold Residents’ rooms are not being cleaned properly Facility has an outbreak of flu due to unsanitary conditions of the facility Staff did not prevent resident from being harmed by other residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Celine Rodriguez conducted a continuation visit to the facility for the complaint and to deliver the findings. LPA Rodriguez explained the purpose of today's visit and was greeted by Executive Director (ED) - Sarah Devore and Resident Care Coordinator (RCC) - Kim Bennett. It was alleged that staff verbally abuses residents. LPA Rodriguez conducted a total of 7 resident interviews of which all 7 interviews did not corroborate with the allegation by stating that staff are nice, helpful, and denied of being a victim of verbal abuse or witnessing it. LPA Rodriguez conducted a total of 3 staff interviews of which all 3 interviews did not corroborate with the allegation. Per staff interviews, staff are required to complete a training on abuse prior to taking care of residents and are not allowed to be on the floor until training is completed. Per record review, LPA Rodriguez observed that all staff have completed abuse training, resident rights, and how to carCDSS inspection report, June 18, 2025 · control 22-AS-20240227140230

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not administer prescribed medication to a resident in care. Staff is smoking a vape pen inside of the facility. Staff did not properly bathe a resident in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegations received on July 03, 2024. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Executive Director (ED) Sarah DeVore. LPA explained the reason for the visit. This Department has investigated the complaint alleging that staff did not administer prescribed medication to a resident in care, staff is smoking a vape pen inside of the facility and staff did not properly bathe a resident in care. Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on February 28, 2024. Regarding the allegations, the following was revealed: During the course of the interviews six of seven individuals interviewed denied the allegations. During the course of the investigation LPA reviewed documents including the Physician Report (LIC602A) dated March 15, 2024 for R1. Per Physician Report R1 is able to administer own prescription medications. During the course of the interviews withCDSS inspection report, October 30, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240703101647
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not cleaning facility properly.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jessica Cho made a subsequent unannounced visit to deliver the findings into the above allegation. LPA met with Operations Specialist (OS) Tierny Wilburn and stated the purpose of the visit after reviewing the allegation. During the initial complaint inspection conducted on January 31, 2024, between 3:05pm to 5:00pm, the following were observed: LPA and OS Wilburn toured and inspected all common areas on levels 1-3. There are no common areas on levels 4-5. There is a strong odor lingering in the lobby past the living room and by the north elevator. The odor was still present on today's date as well. Food particles and dust have accumulated below the dining tables, and the floor was sticky. The floor of the north/south elevator were sticky and had a strong smell of urine inside the north elevator. The floor in the four bathrooms located on the first floor were sticky and had a smell of urine. LPA and OS Wilburn observed two full trash bags in front of uniCDSS inspection report, February 9, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240126094209

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee is not providing housekeeping due to lack of staffing
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst Michelle Reed arrived at the facility to discuss the complaint allegation. Upon arrival, LPA met with Administrator Lana Hammers. According to Ms. Hammers, the facility lost both of their housekeepers in December 2021. Staff, including the Maintenance Director, Administrator and Driver have been assisting wherever they can. Housekeeping is being conducted just not as it was before the loss of staffing. It has been very challenging to find staff and Brookdale is currently using a staffing agency for care staff. The care staff pick up the trash in the evening and some do personal laundry. They do not clean apartments or change bedding, unless providing care to a resident. A new housekeeper was hired on 4/5/22 and Brookdale is also looking into a staffing agency for housekeeping. Based upon interviews and documentation the preponderence of evidence has been met and the allegation is substantiated. See LIC9099D for cited deficiency. An exit interview was conductedCDSS inspection report, April 12, 2022 · control 22-AS-20220408114452

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 15 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
8
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
15
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(714) 974-1616
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Brookdale Nohl Ranch? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.