Watermark At Napa Valley, The is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Napa, Napa County, California — state license #286803919, with a licensed capacity of 240, listed as closed, change of ownership in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 22 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2020, the most recent dated May 20, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

35 homes in view

Watermark At Napa Valley, The

The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 240 residents · Napa, CA · Napa County
Closed in state recordMemory careHospiceBedriddenWheelchair not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days · we confirm by phone before any referral
License #286803919, held since 2020 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
4055 Solano Avenue · Napa, Napa County
Phone
(707) 345-1480
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file — ask the home
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careVerified in record

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 91 AMB, 129 NON-AMB, AND 20 BEDRIDDEN IN ROOMS 168,170,172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186 ON 1ST FLOOR AND261,263,265, 271,273,277,278,279,281 ON 2ND FLOOR. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20. NEW MGMT CO. INTEGRAL SENIOR LIVING MANAGEMENT, LLC EFFECTIVE 04/15/2024.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2020, the state has visited this home 27 times and filed 22 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on May 20, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”

Most recent state visit
May 20, 2025
Occupancy at that visit
168 of 240 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 9 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 30, 2021 to May 20, 2025. 9 of the 9 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 9 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 9 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 15 of 22 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20252 state visits · 2 documents
May 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not dispense medication to residents as prescribed. Licensee did not ensure staff administering medication to residents were appropriately trained. Staff did not adequately address a change in resident’s condition.

On 05/20/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Julie Florio arrived unannounced to deliver complaint 21-AS-20250224164341 investigation findings regarding the above allegations and met with Cheryl Bautista, Resident Care Director. Reporting Party (RP) alleges that staff did not dispense medication to residents as prescribed, Licensee did not ensure staff administering medication to residents were appropriately trained, and staff did not adequately address a change in resident’s condition. LPA Florio conducted 10-day complaint investigation visit on 03/05/2025 and obtained documents, made observations, and conducted interviews. During this visit it was revealed through an interview with Staff 1 (S1) and record review that there were no orders received by the facility to stop Farxiga for Resident 1 (R1) prior to 01/17/2025. Continued on LIC9099C... Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250224164341
May 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not following infection control requirements

On 05/05/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Julie Florio arrived unannounced to deliver complaint 21-AS-20250324142358 investigation findings regarding the above allegation and met with Grant Wegner, Executive Director. Reporting Party (RP) alleges that staff are not following infection control requirements. LPA Florio conducted 10-day complaint investigation visit on 03/27/2025 and obtained documents, made observations, and conducted an interview. Today, 05/05/2025, during facility visit, LPA toured the facility and observed numerous touchless hand sanitizing stations which were all tested and operational. Each was observed with a green light indicating fullness and contained hand sanitizing solution. LPA also inspected five restrooms which were all observed equipped with touchless soap dispensers, faucets, trash cans, and paper towel dispensers. LPA observed hand sanitizing solution and a supply of masks available to residents and guests at the front reception desk. Continued on Lthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 5, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250324142358
20247 state visits · 7 documents
Dec 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 31, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Lack of activities provided to memory care residents Resident records not maintained Facility not kept clean, safe and sanitary Resident hygiene needs not met

On 1/31/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and was greeted by Administrator, Grant Wegner. LPA toured the facility, reviewed resident records and made observations. Complaint alleges a lack of activities provided to memory care residents. Upon a review of facility activity schedules and multiple facility tours of the memory care unit, LPA observed a wide variety of activities both stimulating and engaging with staff and other residents participating. Due to lack of corroborating evidence the allegations is found to be unsubstantiated. Complaint alleges resident records not maintained with resident's (R1) physician's report not updated in a timely manner. Upon review of R1's medical records, it was found R1 did require an annually updated physician's report. However, staff provided documentation that an attempt to contact R1's primary care provider to complete R1's assessment was comleted but hathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 31, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240102152639
Jan 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident eloped from facility

On 1/11/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of initiating complaint investigation and was greeted by Administrator, Grant Wegner. LPA toured the facility, reviewed resident records and made observations during the visit. Complaint alleges resident (R1) eloped from the facility without facility staff knowledge. Based on a review of facility records, on 7/13/2022, resident R1 had eloped the facility memory care unit and found to be outside of the community for approximately 20 minutes before facility was notified. Based on record review and interviews conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Appeal rights given. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 11, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240102152639
20235 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 12, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 31, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 14, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 25, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident

Licensing Program Analysts Bertozzi and Rummonds arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above allegation and met with Administrator, Grant Wegner. Staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident – Complaint alleges that on 7/22/2023 resident had a fall where they initially didn't complain of pain but started to later in the day. When resident started complaining of pain, they were not assessed immediately and not given pain medication. Resident was assessed on the following shift and was sent to the hospital where they were diagnosed with a fracture. Per interviews and document review, resident had an observed fall on 7/27/2023 and was assessed but did not complain of pain. Review of progress notes indicates that resident complained of pain in an area unrelated to their fracture location and was given pain medication approximately 7 hours after their fall. Continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 25, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230815110123
Aug 25, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident

Licensing Program Analysts Bertozzi and Rummonds arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above allegation and met with Administrator, Grant Wegner. Staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident – Complaint alleges that resident had a fall on 07/01/2023 and facility staff did not assess resident for injuries or seek medical attention despite resident complaining of pain. Per interviews and review of resident progress/chart notes, resident experienced a fall on 7/2/2023, was assessed and based on assessment, did not exhibit symptoms requiring them to be seen by a doctor. There was not a fall documented on 7/1/2023. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Nothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 25, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230710103509
Aug 18, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations4typical 1
Type B citations7typical 1
Substantiated complaints11typical 2
Total complaints8typical 7
State visits on file27typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2020.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202522120247712023670202233120213322020110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — Napa County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one.
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →

Is Watermark At Napa Valley, The licensed?

No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Watermark At Napa Valley, The in Napa (Napa County), California license #286803919, as “Closed, Change Of Ownership, formerly licensed for 240 residents. State records list 22 inspection and complaint documents since 2020; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 20, 2025, was marked “Substantiated” by the state.

Can Watermark At Napa Valley, The care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Watermark At Napa Valley, The with clearances for dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list wheelchair / non-ambulatory. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 91 AMB, 129 NON-AMB, AND 20 BEDRIDDEN IN ROOMS 168,170,172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186 ON 1ST FLOOR AND261,263,265, 271,273,277,278,279,281 ON 2ND FLOOR. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20. NEW MGMT CO. INTEGRAL SENIOR LIVING MANAGEMENT, LLC EFFECTIVE 04/15/2024.

How much does Watermark At Napa Valley, The cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Watermark At Napa Valley, The's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Napa County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Watermark At Napa Valley, The accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Watermark At Napa Valley, The is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

168 of 240 beds occupied (70%) when the state visited on May 20, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Watermark At Napa Valley, The?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 27 state visits and 22 dated documents since 2020 for Watermark At Napa Valley, The; 9 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 20, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

9 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not dispense medication to residents as prescribed. Licensee did not ensure staff administering medication to residents were appropriately trained. Staff did not adequately address a change in resident’s condition.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 05/20/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Julie Florio arrived unannounced to deliver complaint 21-AS-20250224164341 investigation findings regarding the above allegations and met with Cheryl Bautista, Resident Care Director. Reporting Party (RP) alleges that staff did not dispense medication to residents as prescribed, Licensee did not ensure staff administering medication to residents were appropriately trained, and staff did not adequately address a change in resident’s condition. LPA Florio conducted 10-day complaint investigation visit on 03/05/2025 and obtained documents, made observations, and conducted interviews. During this visit it was revealed through an interview with Staff 1 (S1) and record review that there were no orders received by the facility to stop Farxiga for Resident 1 (R1) prior to 01/17/2025. Continued on LIC9099C... SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 20, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250224164341
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not following infection control requirements
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 05/05/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Julie Florio arrived unannounced to deliver complaint 21-AS-20250324142358 investigation findings regarding the above allegation and met with Grant Wegner, Executive Director. Reporting Party (RP) alleges that staff are not following infection control requirements. LPA Florio conducted 10-day complaint investigation visit on 03/27/2025 and obtained documents, made observations, and conducted an interview. Today, 05/05/2025, during facility visit, LPA toured the facility and observed numerous touchless hand sanitizing stations which were all tested and operational. Each was observed with a green light indicating fullness and contained hand sanitizing solution. LPA also inspected five restrooms which were all observed equipped with touchless soap dispensers, faucets, trash cans, and paper towel dispensers. LPA observed hand sanitizing solution and a supply of masks available to residents and guests at the front reception desk. Continued on LCDSS inspection report, May 5, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250324142358

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLack of activities provided to memory care residents Resident records not maintained Facility not kept clean, safe and sanitary Resident hygiene needs not met
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 1/31/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and was greeted by Administrator, Grant Wegner. LPA toured the facility, reviewed resident records and made observations. Complaint alleges a lack of activities provided to memory care residents. Upon a review of facility activity schedules and multiple facility tours of the memory care unit, LPA observed a wide variety of activities both stimulating and engaging with staff and other residents participating. Due to lack of corroborating evidence the allegations is found to be unsubstantiated. Complaint alleges resident records not maintained with resident's (R1) physician's report not updated in a timely manner. Upon review of R1's medical records, it was found R1 did require an annually updated physician's report. However, staff provided documentation that an attempt to contact R1's primary care provider to complete R1's assessment was comleted but haCDSS inspection report, January 31, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240102152639
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident eloped from facility
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 1/11/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of initiating complaint investigation and was greeted by Administrator, Grant Wegner. LPA toured the facility, reviewed resident records and made observations during the visit. Complaint alleges resident (R1) eloped from the facility without facility staff knowledge. Based on a review of facility records, on 7/13/2022, resident R1 had eloped the facility memory care unit and found to be outside of the community for approximately 20 minutes before facility was notified. Based on record review and interviews conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Appeal rights given. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 11, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240102152639

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts Bertozzi and Rummonds arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above allegation and met with Administrator, Grant Wegner. Staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident – Complaint alleges that on 7/22/2023 resident had a fall where they initially didn't complain of pain but started to later in the day. When resident started complaining of pain, they were not assessed immediately and not given pain medication. Resident was assessed on the following shift and was sent to the hospital where they were diagnosed with a fracture. Per interviews and document review, resident had an observed fall on 7/27/2023 and was assessed but did not complain of pain. Review of progress notes indicates that resident complained of pain in an area unrelated to their fracture location and was given pain medication approximately 7 hours after their fall. Continued on LIC9099C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 25, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230815110123
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts Bertozzi and Rummonds arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above allegation and met with Administrator, Grant Wegner. Staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident – Complaint alleges that resident had a fall on 07/01/2023 and facility staff did not assess resident for injuries or seek medical attention despite resident complaining of pain. Per interviews and review of resident progress/chart notes, resident experienced a fall on 7/2/2023, was assessed and based on assessment, did not exhibit symptoms requiring them to be seen by a doctor. There was not a fall documented on 7/1/2023. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. NoCDSS inspection report, August 25, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230710103509

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 27 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
4
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
7
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
11
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
8
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
27
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(707) 345-1480
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Watermark At Napa Valley, The? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.