Cedar Creek Senior Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Madera, Madera County, California — state license #207209043, licensed for 162 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 41 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated April 2, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Cedar Creek Senior Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 162 residents · Madera, CA · Madera County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #207209043, held since 2020 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
500 N. Westberry Blvd. · Madera, Madera County
Phone
(559) 673-2345
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 162 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 & OVER; APPROVED FOR 162 NON-AMBULATORY; HOSPICE APPROVED FOR 20; NEW MGMT COMPANY, COGIR SL CEDAR CREEK LLC, EFFECTIVE11/01/2023State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 45 times and filed 41 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated April 2, 2026.

Most recent state visit
April 2, 2026
Occupancy at the July 15, 2024 visit
87 of 162 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 19 documents with transcribed findings, dated February 18, 2022 to July 15, 2024. 19 of the 19 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (7), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (11). 19 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 19 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 24 of 41 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Apr 2, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20255 state visits · 5 documents
Aug 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20247 state visits · 10 documents
Nov 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not report incidents involving resident as required.

On 7/15/24 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) B. Miranda & M. Vega arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegation(s) listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. Executive Director Kelly Reynolds was contacted and met with LPAs. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff did not report incidents involving resident as required. LPA conducted interviews and reviewed records. LPA was informed verbal contact was made with responsible party of R1. A timely incident report was sent to the Dept. Both responsible party and the Dept must be notified of the incident in writing within 7 days. Based on LPAs observations, interviews, & record reviews which were conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, & Chapter 8, are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview was conducted andthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 15, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240304133818
Jul 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent resident from being assaulted by another resident. Staff did not prevent resident from being exploited.

On 7/15/24 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) B. Miranda & M. Vega arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegation(s) listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. Executive Director- Kelly Reynolds was contacted and met with LPAs. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff did not prevent resident from being assaulted by another resident. LPA conducted interviews and reviewed records. R1 is in the memory side of the facility, there was a disagreement between R1 and another resident. This is an isolated event. 2. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff did not prevent resident from being exploited. LPA conducted interviews and reviewed records. LPA reviewed R1's chart and did not find updated POA for medical. At this time all paperwork remains the same. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 15, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240304133818
Feb 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair Facility does not provide a safe environment for the residents in care

On 2/7/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) B. Miranda arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Kelly Reynolds and Administrator (AD) Kimberly Elderidge. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Facility is in disrepair. On 10/13/23 LPA toured the facility and did not observe any issues within the facility regarding the facility being in despair. LPA conducted various interviews with PG&E works, facility staff and residents. There was an accident which caused the power to go out. PG&E brought generators to the facility due to the severity of the car accident and the damage it caused to the electrical lines for the facility. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 7, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231009162701
Feb 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide adequate supervision resulting in residents wandering away from facility Facility was left without electricity Staff do not provide adequate food service Resident Council is ran by facility staff Staff do not provide activities to residents in care.

On 2/7/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) B. Miranda arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver the findings for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Kelly Reynolds and Administrator (AD) Kimberly Elderidge. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff do not provide adequate supervision resulting in residents wandering away from facility. LPA interviewed staff and residents. On interviewee stated there was a resident who was out of memory care and was accompanied by staff. There no other issues reported. 2. The Department investigated the allegation: Facility was left without electricity. LPA conducted interviews with PG&E workers, staff and residents. Interviewees stated they understood there was a situation beyond the control of the facility, and the facility did there best to meet the residents needs. Interviewees did not state they had any concerns. PG&E stated generators werethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 7, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231009155452
Feb 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Ventilation returns in the hallways are filthy Kitchen nutrition is poor Activities canceled & not enough for residents to do Tables not being sanitized Kitchen staff not wearing hair nets or masks during food prep Facility had no certified drivers in December and allowed staff to drive commercial vehicles

On 2/7/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) B. Miranda arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Kelly Reynolds and Administrator (AD) Kimberly Elderidge. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Ventilation returns in the hallways are filthy. LPA toured the facility and did not observe ventilation returns to be dirty. LPA conducted interviews from staff and residents. Interviewees stated they have not observed the ventilation returns to be dirty. 2. The Department investigated the allegation: Kitchen nutrition is poor. LPA reviewed current facility menu, observed kitchen with food supply, and conducted interviews. LPA observed the facility to have proper food supply with food from all the different food categories. LPA observed the menu to have a proper variety of food available to residents. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 7, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240125103121
Jan 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20234 state visits · 8 documents
Nov 30, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 16, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 9, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not make all licensing reports issued by CCL accessible to residents

On 10/9/2023 Licensing Program Analyst B. Miranda arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. Resident Care Director (RCD) Kimberly Jones was contacted and met with LPA. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff did not make all licensing reports issued by CCL accessible to residents. LPA interviewed staff. LPA was shown a binder with reports and documents are available when requested. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report LIC909 was given to RCD Kimberly Jones. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230626140051
Oct 9, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is in financial distress. Medication was accessible to residents in care. Staff do not ensure kitchen is clean.

On 10/9/2023 Licensing Program Analyst B. Miranda arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. Resident Care Director (RCD) Kimberly Jones was contacted and met with LPA. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Facility is in financial distress. On 7/5/23 LPA interviewed various staff members and documentation was reviewed showing due to non-payments vendors services were stopped and or notices were issued informing utilizes were going to be turned off. The Department was not informed of the financial distress of the facility. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230626113948
Oct 9, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair Facility is unsanitary Staff failed to provide a comfortable environment for residents

On 10/9/2023 Licensing Program Analyst B. Miranda arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. Resident Care Director (RCD) Kimberly Jones was contacted and met with LPA. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Facility is in disrepair. LPA toured the facility and did not find the facility to be in disrepair at the time. There was water damage that was being repaired in the Redwood Dining area. On 7/5/23 this allegation was previously Unsubstantiated on complaint # 24-AS-20230306123828 regarding the facility is in disrepair. There were multiple complaints overlapping with one another. Multiple complaints were investigated at the same time. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230626092401
Oct 9, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not properly notify resident's responsible party of rate increase. Staff did not allow resident’s responsible party to participate in decision-making regarding the care and services provided to the resident.

On 10/9/2023 Licensing Program Analyst B. Miranda arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. Resident Care Director (RCD) Kimberly Jones was contacted and met with LPA. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff did not properly notify resident's responsible party of rate increase. LPA conducted interviews and reviewed records. Admission agreement stated there would be a certain amount of time allowed before increases took place. The facility did not follow the allowed time with proper written notice according to admission agreement. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230807083425
Aug 24, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure resident's pressure injury is cleaned. Staff does not respond to resident's call button in a timely manner. Facility does not have adequate staffing to meet resident's needs.

On 8/24/23 at 1:08 p.m. Licensing Program Analyst B. Miranda arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver the findings of the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself to receptionist and requested to speak with the Administrator Joan Johnson. Receptionist stated Administrator was not available and all other managers were not available. Marketing Director contacted Resident Care Director (RCD) Kimberly Jones who arrived shortly after. LPA met with RCD and explained the reason for the visit. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff does not ensure resident's pressure injury is cleaned. LPA conducted interviews and reviewed records. Facility was not able to provide Healthcare Plan which includes services that are provided by Home Health and which services are provided by the facility including the duration of the services. Communication log indicates there was discrepancies in Home Health Providers and resident was not getting proper care for pressure injuries. Residthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 24, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230501112552
Aug 24, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure resident's showering needs are being met. Staff does not provide adequate food service to resident. Staff leaves resident soiled for an extended period of time.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) B. Miranda arrived at the facility unannounced. LPA met with Rsident Care Director Kimberly Jones and explained the reason for the visit. During this visit LPA delivered investigation findings regarding the above allegations. The Department has investigated the complaint alleging: Staff does not ensure resident's showering needs are being met, Staff does not provide adequate food service to resident, Staff leaves resident soiled for an extended period of time. Based on the interviews conducted and/or records review the above allegations is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. Exit interview was conducted an a copy of this report was provided to Kimberly Jones. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 24, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230501112552
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations10typical 1
Type B citations7typical 1
Substantiated complaints20typical 2
Total complaints16typical 7
State visits on file45typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2020.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020255502024710120231220620222402021440
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Madera County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2024 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (559) 673-2345

Is Cedar Creek Senior Living licensed?

Yes — Cedar Creek Senior Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Madera (Madera County): California license #207209043, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 162 residents. State records list 41 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated April 2, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Cedar Creek Senior Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Cedar Creek Senior Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 & OVER; APPROVED FOR 162 NON-AMBULATORY; HOSPICE APPROVED FOR 20; NEW MGMT COMPANY, COGIR SL CEDAR CREEK LLC, EFFECTIVE11/01/2023

How much does Cedar Creek Senior Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Cedar Creek Senior Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Madera County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Cedar Creek Senior Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Cedar Creek Senior Living is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

87 of 162 beds occupied (54%) when the state visited on July 15, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Cedar Creek Senior Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 45 state visits and 41 dated documents since 2021 for Cedar Creek Senior Living; 19 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated July 15, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

19 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not report incidents involving resident as required.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 7/15/24 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) B. Miranda & M. Vega arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegation(s) listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. Executive Director Kelly Reynolds was contacted and met with LPAs. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff did not report incidents involving resident as required. LPA conducted interviews and reviewed records. LPA was informed verbal contact was made with responsible party of R1. A timely incident report was sent to the Dept. Both responsible party and the Dept must be notified of the incident in writing within 7 days. Based on LPAs observations, interviews, & record reviews which were conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, & Chapter 8, are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview was conducted andCDSS inspection report, July 15, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240304133818
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent resident from being assaulted by another resident. Staff did not prevent resident from being exploited.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 7/15/24 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) B. Miranda & M. Vega arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegation(s) listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. Executive Director- Kelly Reynolds was contacted and met with LPAs. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff did not prevent resident from being assaulted by another resident. LPA conducted interviews and reviewed records. R1 is in the memory side of the facility, there was a disagreement between R1 and another resident. This is an isolated event. 2. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff did not prevent resident from being exploited. LPA conducted interviews and reviewed records. LPA reviewed R1's chart and did not find updated POA for medical. At this time all paperwork remains the same. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 15, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240304133818
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is in disrepair Facility does not provide a safe environment for the residents in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 2/7/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) B. Miranda arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Kelly Reynolds and Administrator (AD) Kimberly Elderidge. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Facility is in disrepair. On 10/13/23 LPA toured the facility and did not observe any issues within the facility regarding the facility being in despair. LPA conducted various interviews with PG&E works, facility staff and residents. There was an accident which caused the power to go out. PG&E brought generators to the facility due to the severity of the car accident and the damage it caused to the electrical lines for the facility. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 7, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231009162701
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not provide adequate supervision resulting in residents wandering away from facility Facility was left without electricity Staff do not provide adequate food service Resident Council is ran by facility staff Staff do not provide activities to residents in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 2/7/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) B. Miranda arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver the findings for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Kelly Reynolds and Administrator (AD) Kimberly Elderidge. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff do not provide adequate supervision resulting in residents wandering away from facility. LPA interviewed staff and residents. On interviewee stated there was a resident who was out of memory care and was accompanied by staff. There no other issues reported. 2. The Department investigated the allegation: Facility was left without electricity. LPA conducted interviews with PG&E workers, staff and residents. Interviewees stated they understood there was a situation beyond the control of the facility, and the facility did there best to meet the residents needs. Interviewees did not state they had any concerns. PG&E stated generators wereCDSS inspection report, February 7, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231009155452
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedVentilation returns in the hallways are filthy Kitchen nutrition is poor Activities canceled & not enough for residents to do Tables not being sanitized Kitchen staff not wearing hair nets or masks during food prep Facility had no certified drivers in December and allowed staff to drive commercial vehicles
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 2/7/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) B. Miranda arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Kelly Reynolds and Administrator (AD) Kimberly Elderidge. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Ventilation returns in the hallways are filthy. LPA toured the facility and did not observe ventilation returns to be dirty. LPA conducted interviews from staff and residents. Interviewees stated they have not observed the ventilation returns to be dirty. 2. The Department investigated the allegation: Kitchen nutrition is poor. LPA reviewed current facility menu, observed kitchen with food supply, and conducted interviews. LPA observed the facility to have proper food supply with food from all the different food categories. LPA observed the menu to have a proper variety of food available to residents. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 7, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240125103121

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not make all licensing reports issued by CCL accessible to residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/9/2023 Licensing Program Analyst B. Miranda arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. Resident Care Director (RCD) Kimberly Jones was contacted and met with LPA. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff did not make all licensing reports issued by CCL accessible to residents. LPA interviewed staff. LPA was shown a binder with reports and documents are available when requested. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report LIC909 was given to RCD Kimberly Jones. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 9, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230626140051
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is in financial distress. Medication was accessible to residents in care. Staff do not ensure kitchen is clean.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 10/9/2023 Licensing Program Analyst B. Miranda arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. Resident Care Director (RCD) Kimberly Jones was contacted and met with LPA. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Facility is in financial distress. On 7/5/23 LPA interviewed various staff members and documentation was reviewed showing due to non-payments vendors services were stopped and or notices were issued informing utilizes were going to be turned off. The Department was not informed of the financial distress of the facility. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 9, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230626113948
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is in disrepair Facility is unsanitary Staff failed to provide a comfortable environment for residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/9/2023 Licensing Program Analyst B. Miranda arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. Resident Care Director (RCD) Kimberly Jones was contacted and met with LPA. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Facility is in disrepair. LPA toured the facility and did not find the facility to be in disrepair at the time. There was water damage that was being repaired in the Redwood Dining area. On 7/5/23 this allegation was previously Unsubstantiated on complaint # 24-AS-20230306123828 regarding the facility is in disrepair. There were multiple complaints overlapping with one another. Multiple complaints were investigated at the same time. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 9, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230626092401
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not properly notify resident's responsible party of rate increase. Staff did not allow resident’s responsible party to participate in decision-making regarding the care and services provided to the resident.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 10/9/2023 Licensing Program Analyst B. Miranda arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. Resident Care Director (RCD) Kimberly Jones was contacted and met with LPA. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff did not properly notify resident's responsible party of rate increase. LPA conducted interviews and reviewed records. Admission agreement stated there would be a certain amount of time allowed before increases took place. The facility did not follow the allowed time with proper written notice according to admission agreement. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 9, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230807083425
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure resident's pressure injury is cleaned. Staff does not respond to resident's call button in a timely manner. Facility does not have adequate staffing to meet resident's needs.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 8/24/23 at 1:08 p.m. Licensing Program Analyst B. Miranda arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver the findings of the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself to receptionist and requested to speak with the Administrator Joan Johnson. Receptionist stated Administrator was not available and all other managers were not available. Marketing Director contacted Resident Care Director (RCD) Kimberly Jones who arrived shortly after. LPA met with RCD and explained the reason for the visit. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff does not ensure resident's pressure injury is cleaned. LPA conducted interviews and reviewed records. Facility was not able to provide Healthcare Plan which includes services that are provided by Home Health and which services are provided by the facility including the duration of the services. Communication log indicates there was discrepancies in Home Health Providers and resident was not getting proper care for pressure injuries. ResidCDSS inspection report, August 24, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230501112552
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure resident's showering needs are being met. Staff does not provide adequate food service to resident. Staff leaves resident soiled for an extended period of time.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) B. Miranda arrived at the facility unannounced. LPA met with Rsident Care Director Kimberly Jones and explained the reason for the visit. During this visit LPA delivered investigation findings regarding the above allegations. The Department has investigated the complaint alleging: Staff does not ensure resident's showering needs are being met, Staff does not provide adequate food service to resident, Staff leaves resident soiled for an extended period of time. Based on the interviews conducted and/or records review the above allegations is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. Exit interview was conducted an a copy of this report was provided to Kimberly Jones. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 24, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230501112552
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not following Covid-19 masking protocols Staff do not follow procedures which protect the safety of food during preparation and service. Facility is dirty. Staff do not respond to resident's requests for assistance in a timely manner. Staff do not ensure that resident is given the correct medication.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 7/5/2023 at 1:50 p.m. Licensing Program Analyst B. Miranda arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit with Senior Director of Sales & Marketing Gaby Alvarado. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff are not following Covid-19 masking protocols. LPA toured the facility and found some employees to either not be wearing a mask or wearing the mask incorrectly. At this time is was still mandatory for all employees to wear masks while working in the facility. 2. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff do not follow procedures which protect the safety of food during preparation and service. LPA toured the facility on various occasions and found kitchen staff to not be wearing gloves while preparing food and to be without hairnets. LPA requested multiple time for training of kitchen staff and kitchen staff contact information which was never provided. SubstaCDSS inspection report, July 5, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230306123828
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is in disrepair.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 7/5/2023 at 1:50 p.m. Licensing Program Analyst B. Miranda arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. Senior Director of Sales & Marketing Gaby Alvarado 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Facility is in disrepair. LPA conducted 4 staff interviews and toured the facility. LPA observed certain areas of the facility needing to be cleaned. Repairs were being completed in Redwood Room. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was given to Senior Director of Sales & Marketing Gaby Alvarado UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 5, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230306123828
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedPersonnel records are not adequately maintained by staff
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 7/5/2023 at 1:50 p.m. Licensing Program Analyst B. Miranda arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit and met with Senior Director of Sales & Marketing Gaby Alvarado. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Personnel records are not adequately maintained by staff. LPA interviewed staff members and observed a sample of personnel records. Relias is the system used for training. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview was completed and a copy of this report was provided to Gaby Alvarado. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 5, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230329140137
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not safeguard resident's records Staff do not provide adequate supervision to prevent residents from leaving the facility
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 7/5/2023 at 1:50 p.m. Licensing Program Analyst B. Miranda arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit and met with Senior Director of Sales & Marketing Gaby Alvarado 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff did not safeguard resident's records. During a tour of the facility LPA noticed the top half of the Medication room was not locked and was able to be unlocked from the bottom and client's records were accessible. Administrator (Shawniee Jackson) asked staff why the medication door was left open, and staff stated because they just came out of the Med Room. LPA observed Med-Tech walking from an area of a resident's rooms and not the med room. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 5, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230329140137
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not properly manage a resident's medication.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 6/14/2023 at 1:23 p.m. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) B. Miranda arrived to the facility unannounced to open a complaint and conduct an investigation. LPA met with Resident Care Director Marilyn Couzens and explained the reason for the visit. LPA collected sample Centerally Stored Medication log, communication log, and Med Tech procedures. Marilyn will provide staff schedule for June and staff contact information by end of business day 6/19/23. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Facility staff did not properly manage a resident's medication. LPA interviewed staff members and reviewed a sample of resident records. LPA observed Centerally Stored Medication log to not be completed. Bubble packs did not have date medication started and incorrect amount of medication in container. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 14, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230612102501
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained injuries from falls while in care Staff mishandled a resident's medication Staff overmedicated a resident while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 03/07/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), L. Salazar arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was greeted by receptionist, stated the purpose of the visit and was allowed entry into the facility. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and records review. Based on the information received and although the allegations may have happened, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. When Resident R1 was admitted to hospice care services, the facility did not receive a discontinue order for medications. Facility was continuing to follow doctor's order. Facility provided extra care and supervision and documented contact with the hospice agency regarding R1's condition. NoCDSS inspection report, March 7, 2023 · control 24-AS-20221011105453

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident fell multiple times while in care as the result of neglect, sustaining a fracture and hematoma.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 02/18/22, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Salazar arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver findings on the above complaint allegation. LPA was greeted by front desk staff, stated the purpose of the visit, and was allowed entry into the facility. COVID precautionary measures were taken prior to LPA entering the facility. The Department has investigated the above allegation. Through interviews and records review that were conducted, it was documented that Resident R1’s health began to decline. R1 was admitted to Hospice on 09/21/21 and moved to the “Generations” Memory Care unit. It was documented that R1 had been non-compliant in using their walker for ambulation. The facility responded immediately, called 911 and sought medical treatment for R1. Although the allegation may have happened, there is not a preponderance of evident to prove that the alleged violation occurred, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted and copy of report was left withCDSS inspection report, February 18, 2022 · control 24-AS-20210924163703
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are mismanaging resident’s medications. Care and supervision is not being provided to residents while in care. Facility had inadequate diapering supplies. Facility has a rodent infestation.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 02/18/22, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Salazar arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver findings on the above complaint allegations. LPA was greeted by front desk staff, stated the purpose of the visit, and was allowed entry into the facility. COVID precautionary measures were taken prior to LPA entering the facility. During the investigation, LPA reviewed pest control records, medication records, staffing schedules, facility procedures and conducted interviews with staff, residents, and Executive Director. Based on the information received, the Department has found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegations are false, and/or is without reasonable basis. NoCDSS inspection report, February 18, 2022 · control 24-AS-20211005112928

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 45 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
10
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
7
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
20
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
16
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
45
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(559) 673-2345
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Cedar Creek Senior Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.