Cedar Creek Senior Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Madera, Madera County, California — state license #207209043, licensed for 162 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 41 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated April 2, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2021, the state has visited this home 45 times and filed 41 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated April 2, 2026.
The state's published file for this home includes 19 documents with transcribed findings, dated February 18, 2022 to July 15, 2024. 19 of the 19 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (7), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (11). 19 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 19 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Apr 2, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Aug 14, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Aug 11, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Apr 17, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Apr 8, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Mar 13, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 7, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 9, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jul 22, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jul 15, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not report incidents involving resident as required.
On 7/15/24 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) B. Miranda & M. Vega arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegation(s) listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. Executive Director Kelly Reynolds was contacted and met with LPAs. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff did not report incidents involving resident as required. LPA conducted interviews and reviewed records. LPA was informed verbal contact was made with responsible party of R1. A timely incident report was sent to the Dept. Both responsible party and the Dept must be notified of the incident in writing within 7 days. Based on LPAs observations, interviews, & record reviews which were conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, & Chapter 8, are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview was conducted andthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 15, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240304133818
Jul 15, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent resident from being assaulted by another resident. Staff did not prevent resident from being exploited.
On 7/15/24 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) B. Miranda & M. Vega arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegation(s) listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. Executive Director- Kelly Reynolds was contacted and met with LPAs. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff did not prevent resident from being assaulted by another resident. LPA conducted interviews and reviewed records. R1 is in the memory side of the facility, there was a disagreement between R1 and another resident. This is an isolated event. 2. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff did not prevent resident from being exploited. LPA conducted interviews and reviewed records. LPA reviewed R1's chart and did not find updated POA for medical. At this time all paperwork remains the same. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 15, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240304133818
Feb 7, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair Facility does not provide a safe environment for the residents in care
On 2/7/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) B. Miranda arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Kelly Reynolds and Administrator (AD) Kimberly Elderidge. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Facility is in disrepair. On 10/13/23 LPA toured the facility and did not observe any issues within the facility regarding the facility being in despair. LPA conducted various interviews with PG&E works, facility staff and residents. There was an accident which caused the power to go out. PG&E brought generators to the facility due to the severity of the car accident and the damage it caused to the electrical lines for the facility. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 7, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231009162701
Feb 7, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide adequate supervision resulting in residents wandering away from facility Facility was left without electricity Staff do not provide adequate food service Resident Council is ran by facility staff Staff do not provide activities to residents in care.
On 2/7/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) B. Miranda arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver the findings for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Kelly Reynolds and Administrator (AD) Kimberly Elderidge. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff do not provide adequate supervision resulting in residents wandering away from facility. LPA interviewed staff and residents. On interviewee stated there was a resident who was out of memory care and was accompanied by staff. There no other issues reported. 2. The Department investigated the allegation: Facility was left without electricity. LPA conducted interviews with PG&E workers, staff and residents. Interviewees stated they understood there was a situation beyond the control of the facility, and the facility did there best to meet the residents needs. Interviewees did not state they had any concerns. PG&E stated generators werethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 7, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231009155452
Feb 7, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Ventilation returns in the hallways are filthy Kitchen nutrition is poor Activities canceled & not enough for residents to do Tables not being sanitized Kitchen staff not wearing hair nets or masks during food prep Facility had no certified drivers in December and allowed staff to drive commercial vehicles
On 2/7/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) B. Miranda arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Kelly Reynolds and Administrator (AD) Kimberly Elderidge. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Ventilation returns in the hallways are filthy. LPA toured the facility and did not observe ventilation returns to be dirty. LPA conducted interviews from staff and residents. Interviewees stated they have not observed the ventilation returns to be dirty. 2. The Department investigated the allegation: Kitchen nutrition is poor. LPA reviewed current facility menu, observed kitchen with food supply, and conducted interviews. LPA observed the facility to have proper food supply with food from all the different food categories. LPA observed the menu to have a proper variety of food available to residents. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 7, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240125103121
Jan 25, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jan 16, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 30, 2023Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 16, 2023Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 9, 2023Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not make all licensing reports issued by CCL accessible to residents
On 10/9/2023 Licensing Program Analyst B. Miranda arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. Resident Care Director (RCD) Kimberly Jones was contacted and met with LPA. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff did not make all licensing reports issued by CCL accessible to residents. LPA interviewed staff. LPA was shown a binder with reports and documents are available when requested. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report LIC909 was given to RCD Kimberly Jones. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230626140051
Oct 9, 2023Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is in financial distress. Medication was accessible to residents in care. Staff do not ensure kitchen is clean.
On 10/9/2023 Licensing Program Analyst B. Miranda arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. Resident Care Director (RCD) Kimberly Jones was contacted and met with LPA. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Facility is in financial distress. On 7/5/23 LPA interviewed various staff members and documentation was reviewed showing due to non-payments vendors services were stopped and or notices were issued informing utilizes were going to be turned off. The Department was not informed of the financial distress of the facility. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230626113948
Oct 9, 2023Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair Facility is unsanitary Staff failed to provide a comfortable environment for residents
On 10/9/2023 Licensing Program Analyst B. Miranda arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. Resident Care Director (RCD) Kimberly Jones was contacted and met with LPA. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Facility is in disrepair. LPA toured the facility and did not find the facility to be in disrepair at the time. There was water damage that was being repaired in the Redwood Dining area. On 7/5/23 this allegation was previously Unsubstantiated on complaint # 24-AS-20230306123828 regarding the facility is in disrepair. There were multiple complaints overlapping with one another. Multiple complaints were investigated at the same time. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230626092401
Oct 9, 2023Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not properly notify resident's responsible party of rate increase. Staff did not allow resident’s responsible party to participate in decision-making regarding the care and services provided to the resident.
On 10/9/2023 Licensing Program Analyst B. Miranda arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. Resident Care Director (RCD) Kimberly Jones was contacted and met with LPA. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff did not properly notify resident's responsible party of rate increase. LPA conducted interviews and reviewed records. Admission agreement stated there would be a certain amount of time allowed before increases took place. The facility did not follow the allowed time with proper written notice according to admission agreement. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230807083425
Aug 24, 2023Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure resident's pressure injury is cleaned. Staff does not respond to resident's call button in a timely manner. Facility does not have adequate staffing to meet resident's needs.
On 8/24/23 at 1:08 p.m. Licensing Program Analyst B. Miranda arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver the findings of the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself to receptionist and requested to speak with the Administrator Joan Johnson. Receptionist stated Administrator was not available and all other managers were not available. Marketing Director contacted Resident Care Director (RCD) Kimberly Jones who arrived shortly after. LPA met with RCD and explained the reason for the visit. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff does not ensure resident's pressure injury is cleaned. LPA conducted interviews and reviewed records. Facility was not able to provide Healthcare Plan which includes services that are provided by Home Health and which services are provided by the facility including the duration of the services. Communication log indicates there was discrepancies in Home Health Providers and resident was not getting proper care for pressure injuries. Residthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 24, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230501112552
Aug 24, 2023Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure resident's showering needs are being met. Staff does not provide adequate food service to resident. Staff leaves resident soiled for an extended period of time.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) B. Miranda arrived at the facility unannounced. LPA met with Rsident Care Director Kimberly Jones and explained the reason for the visit. During this visit LPA delivered investigation findings regarding the above allegations. The Department has investigated the complaint alleging: Staff does not ensure resident's showering needs are being met, Staff does not provide adequate food service to resident, Staff leaves resident soiled for an extended period of time. Based on the interviews conducted and/or records review the above allegations is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. Exit interview was conducted an a copy of this report was provided to Kimberly Jones. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 24, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230501112552
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Cedar Creek Senior Living licensed?
Yes — Cedar Creek Senior Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Madera (Madera County): California license #207209043, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 162 residents. State records list 41 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated April 2, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.
Can Cedar Creek Senior Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Cedar Creek Senior Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 & OVER; APPROVED FOR 162 NON-AMBULATORY; HOSPICE APPROVED FOR 20; NEW MGMT COMPANY, COGIR SL CEDAR CREEK LLC, EFFECTIVE11/01/2023
How much does Cedar Creek Senior Living cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Cedar Creek Senior Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Madera County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Cedar Creek Senior Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Cedar Creek Senior Living is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.
Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
87 of 162 beds occupied (54%) when the state visited on July 15, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Cedar Creek Senior Living?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 45 state visits and 41 dated documents since 2021 for Cedar Creek Senior Living; 19 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated July 15, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2024
2023
2022
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 45 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(559) 673-2345Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Cedar Creek Senior Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.