Savant Of Burbank East is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Burbank, Los Angeles County, California — state license #198603136, licensed for 100 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 81 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 12, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

4 homes in view

Savant Of Burbank East

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 100 residents · Burbank, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #198603136, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1900 Grismer Ave · Burbank, Los Angeles County
Phone
(818) 843-3141
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 100 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 10 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 100 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 30 RESIDENTS.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 93 times and filed 81 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated June 12, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 14, 2026
Occupancy at the March 3, 2023 visit
92 of 100 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 25 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 16, 2021 to March 3, 2023. 25 of the 25 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (22). 25 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 25 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 53 of 81 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20266 state visits · 8 documents
Jun 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202511 state visits · 12 documents
Dec 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202416 state visits · 27 documents
Dec 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20235 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 6, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 20, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 20, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 3, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 25, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 16, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations5typical 1
Type B citations8typical 1
Substantiated complaints16typical 2
Total complaints69typical 7
State visits on file93typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20266802025111202024162702023141602022121422021780
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (818) 843-3141

Is Savant Of Burbank East licensed?

Yes — Savant Of Burbank East is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Burbank (Los Angeles County): California license #198603136, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 100 residents. State records list 81 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 12, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Savant Of Burbank East care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Savant Of Burbank East with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 100 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 30 RESIDENTS.

How much does Savant Of Burbank East cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Savant Of Burbank East's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Savant Of Burbank East accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Savant Of Burbank East through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Los Angeles County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

92 of 100 beds occupied (92%) when the state visited on March 3, 2023. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Savant Of Burbank East?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 93 state visits and 81 dated documents since 2021 for Savant Of Burbank East; 25 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 3, 2023, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

25 transcribed reports on file

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not have hot water.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tuesday Cabiness met with Executive Director (ED) Nirjara Acharya and informed her the reason of the visit. From 1pm to 230pm LPA interviewed the ED and conducted a physical inspection of random resident's and employee bathrooms, on the first and second floor. Hot water ranged from temperatures of 105.8, 107.6, 110.6, and 111.2, which is in compliance with Licensing regulations. Although, the ED confirmed the hot water was out, a repair company, came the same day, and attempted to fix the boiler. The boiler needed a part, which was ordered and the boiler was fixed a day later. The ED, submitted an incident report, and all residents were notified that the hot water was not operable, but would be fixed. Therefore, based on physical plant inspection, and documentation received, the allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 3, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230227090159
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not safeguard resident personal belongings Staff threatened resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
**** This amended report supersedes report dated 02/24/2023. It was created to remove identifiling information from origianal 9099 and 9099C report and add additional response from staff. The additional revision did not change any other aspects of the report and all aspects including the findings remain the same.*** LPAs Alberto Lopez and Erik Zaragoza made subsequent unannounced visit to investigate the above allegations. LPAs met with Office Manager Marili Barajas and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff #1-#6 (S1-S6) and residents #1-#9 (R1-R9). LPAs reviewed and obtained staff and residents’ rosters, R10 Physicians report dated 10/20/2021 and preplacement appraisal. R10 inventory of personal effects dated 9/25/2020. R10 refused to fill out but signed the form. Residents’ departure inventory list dated 11/23/2022. (Continued on 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 24, 2023 · control 28-AS-20221212130852
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff does not ensure that resident receives food on a timely basis. Facility staff does not ensure that resident's food does not have items missing. Facility staff threw away resident's items.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tihesha Smith made an unannounced complaint visit to this facility at 11:37 am to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with the administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. LPA conducted interviews with the administrator, seven (7) staff members and ten (10) out of ten (10) residents between 11:50am – 3:30pm. In addition, LPA reviewed facility records from 2:20pm to 3:15pm and obtained copies of pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. LPA conducted a physical plant tour at approximately 12:30 pm to ensure that the facility is in compliance with rules and regulations under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6. LPA did not observe any immediate health and safety issues during the visit. Facility staff does not ensure that resident receive food on a timely basis. During the physical plant tour, LPA observed residents in dining room and in their bedrooms eating UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 26, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230125085608
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff yells at residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately, 10:00am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Angela Panushkina arrived to this facility in response to the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with the Office Manager and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a physical plant walk through, at approximately 10:30am, to ensure that the facility is in compliance with rules and regulations under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6. LPA did not observe any immediate health and safety issues during the visit. LPA conducted interviews with the Office Manager, MedTech, two (2) staff members and ten (10) out of eleven (11) residents between 10:30am - 12:50pm. In addition, LPA reviewed facility records from 1:00pm to 2:00pm and obtained copies of pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. Continue on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 18, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230113122750
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained a fall while in care Staff did not provide adequate care and supervision to a resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately, 10:00am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Angela Panushkina arrived to this facility in response to the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with the Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a physical plant walk through, at approximately 10:30am, to ensure that the facility is in compliance with rules and regulations under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6. LPA did not observe any immediate health and safety issues during the visit. LPA conducted an interview with the Office Manager, MedTech, two (2) staff members, ten (10) out of eleven (11) residents between 10:30am - 12:50pm. In addition, LPA reviewed facility records from 1:00pm to 2:00pm and obtained copies of pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. Continue on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 18, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230113145359

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff increased rates without a proper notice.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Marili Barajas Business Manager and explained the reason for the visit. Shortly thereafter Administrator Nirjara Acharya arrived. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA requested staff/resident roster. LPA interviewed resident #1(R1),#2(R2),#3(R3),#4(R4),#5(R5), and #6 (R6) from 1:30 PM to 2:30 PM. LPA interviewed Marili Barajas Business Manager at 1:15 PM and Administrator at 3:00 PM. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Based on interviews conducted and information gathered 6 of 6 residents interviewed stated they received over a month ago a letter from the facility regarding a cost of living increase. Stated they received it in a timely manner. 5 of 6 residents stated they understood that SSA and SSI would be increased and why in turn their rent would increase. Staff interviewed stated that a letter waCDSS inspection report, December 19, 2022 · control 28-AS-20221209154741
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has bed bugs.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Galarza conducted a subsequent complaint investigation for the allegations listed above. The purpose of the visit was explained to Office Manager Marili Barajas. Administrator Nirjana Acharya arrived shortly after and assisted with today's visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 7/29/20, due to COVID-19 pandemic a virtual physical plant inspection of resident rooms was conducted via FaceTime between 3:07 pm – 3:49 pm. LPA observed rooms 102, 115, 123, 124, 125, 203, 215, 216, 220, and 245. Staff (S1- S3), and residents (R1- R2) were interviewed. On 8/12/2020, LPA interviewed residents (R3-R10) and staff (S4-S6) telephonically, and visually inspected rooms 217, 218, 220, & 221 via FaceTime. 8/13/2020. The following documents were obtained: Identification and Emergency Information/Face Sheet, Admission Record, physician order (7/20/20), POLST, Preplacement Appraisal Information, Admission Agreement, Shower Assignment, and MD Visit report. DCDSS inspection report, December 1, 2022 · control 28-AS-20200723145406
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not assisting resident with showering needs. Facility staff do not allow resident to leave their room. Facility staff are not keeping the resident's room clean
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Galarza conducted a subsequent complaint investigation for the allegations listed above. The purpose of the visit was explained to Office Manager Marili Barajas. Administrator Nirjana Acharya arrived shortly after and assisted with today's visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 7/29/20, due to COVID-19 pandemic a virtual physical plant inspection of resident rooms was conducted via FaceTime between 3:07 pm – 3:49 pm. LPA observed rooms 102, 115, 123, 124, 125, 203, 215, 216, 220, and 245. Staff (S1- S3), and residents (R1- R2) were interviewed. On 8/12/2020, LPA interviewed residents (R3-R10) and staff (S4-S6) telephonically, and visually inspected rooms 217, 218, 220, & 221 via FaceTime. 8/13/2020. The following documents were obtained: Identification and Emergency Information/Face Sheet, Admission Record, physician order (7/20/20), POLST, Preplacement Appraisal Information, Admission Agreement, Shower Assignment, and MD Visit report. DCDSS inspection report, December 1, 2022 · control 28-AS-20200723145406
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not provide adequate care and supervision to a resident while in care. Facility staff made inappropriate comments to resident while in care. Facility staff did not treat resident with dignity and respect. Facility staff did not ensure that an Ombudsman poster is displayed at the facility.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
**** This amended report supersedes report dated 11/18/2022. It was created to add additional resident information and new staff responses to questions to support the first 3 allegation findings and to correct resident # from R1 to R2 on allgation #1 The additional revision did not change any other aspects of the report and all aspects including the findings remain the same.*** Licensing Program Analyst(s) (LPA) Alberto Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation(s). LPA met with Administrator NIrjara Acyarya and explained the reason for the visit. On Subsequent visit on 03/06/2023 LPA met with Office Manager Marili Barajas and expalined pupose of visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA requested the following documents: physician's report, for #1(R1) and #2(R2) and personnel and staff rosters. LPA interviewed resident #1(R1), #2(R2),#3(R3),#4(R4),#5(R5),#6(R6),#7(R7),#8(R8),#9(R9) Administrator and staff #1(S1),#2(S2)#3(CDSS inspection report, November 18, 2022 · control 28-AS-20221117125637
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident contracted infections while in care resulting in hospitalization.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)/Retired Annuitant (RA) Elizabeth Ceniceros made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by Staff #1 (S1: Marili Barajas, Office Manager). LPA/RA Ceniceros spoke to S1 prior to entering the facility to conduct a risk assessment. S1 informed LPA/RA that the facility has no COVID cases nor do any of the residents or staff have symptoms. The purpose of today’s visit is to conduct a subsequent visit to deliver the findings pertaining to the above-mentioned allegation. An initial 10-Day virtual visit was conducted by LPA Nicol Wesley on 01/13/21 (via telephone) with S1 due to the situation surrounding the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and to implement mitigation measures. LPA/RA Ceniceros interviewed (between 8:15 a.m. - 9:00 a.m.) facility staff member and residents in care (R2-R3). Resident #1 was not interviewed; as the resident moved out of the facility on 12/29/20. LPA/RA Ceniceros reviewed pertinent documents (between 9:00 a.m. – 9:45CDSS inspection report, October 13, 2022 · control 28-AS-20210104085209
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff inappropriately speak to residents in care. Residents are not being provided their medications as prescribed. Residents are being left in soiled diapers for long periods of time.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)/Retired Annuitant (RA) Elizabeth Ceniceros made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by Staff #1 (S1: Marili Barajas, Office Manager). LPA/RA Ceniceros spoke to S1 prior to entering the facility to conduct a risk assessment. S1 informed LPA/RA that the facility has no COVID cases nor do any of the residents or staff have symptoms. The purpose of today’s visit is to conduct a subsequent visit to deliver the findings pertaining to the above-mentioned allegations. An initial 10-Day virtual visit was conducted by LPA Glenn Trueman on 04/22/21 (via telephone) with S1 due to the situation surrounding the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and to implement mitigation measures. LPA/RA Ceniceros interviewed two facility staff members (S1 & S5) and five residents in care (R2-R6). LPA/RA did not interview the following staff for the reasons noted: Staff #2 (Caregiver - resigned: 06/04/21), Staff #3 (Med Tech/Caregiver - resigned: 12/20/21)), StaffCDSS inspection report, October 13, 2022 · control 28-AS-20210416113753
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained pressure injuries while in care Staff handled resident in a rough manner Staff failed to treat residents with dignity and respect Staff made inappropriate comments toward resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
This report supersedes the one dated 09/01/2022 to include additional information. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made a subsequent visit for the allegations listed above. LPA met with Office Manger Marili Barajas and Administrator Nirjara Acharya. At initial visit 08/19/2021 the following occurred: The investigation consisted of the following: Interviews with Administrator, and Staff S1-S 3 from 9:15 AM to 11:00 AM. LPA Trueman requested Physician's Report, Needs and Services Plan, Emergency ID page and Hospice Documentation from Resident 1's file. At today's visit 09/01/2022 from 1:15 PM to 3:00 PM Resident's 1-8 were interviewed. In regards to Resident sustained pressure injuries while in care, Documentation from Hospice Agency for Resident R1 specifies Physician's Order start date 08/10/2021 and stop date 09/08/2021 L ankle wound and to cleanse with NS pat dry and cover with gauze every 2 to 3 days as needed. Documentation titled Skin Impairment Assessment from HospiCDSS inspection report, October 12, 2022 · control 28-AS-20210818102537
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not address an open sore on resident's buttock in a timely manner
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst(s) (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation(s). LPA met with Marili Barajas Business Manager and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA requested staff/resident roster. LPA interviewed resident #1(R1),#2(R2),#3(R3),#4(R4),#5(R5),#6(R6),#7(R7),#8(R8),#9(R9) and staff #1(S1),#2(S2)#3(S3),#4(S4),#5(S5). LPA requested the following documents; physician's report, admission agreement, unusual incident report, face sheet, emergency and identification information, preplacement appraissal, and hospital discharge documents for resident #1(R1). The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Staff did not address an open sore on resident's buttock in a timely manner. It is alleged that caregiver changing R1 noticed an open sore on right buttocks, notify the Technician about the sore, and nobody followed up with R1. Interviews with residents revealCDSS inspection report, October 11, 2022 · control 28-AS-20221005131717
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained pressure injuries while in care Staff handled resident in a rough manner Staff failed to treat residents with dignity and respect Staff made inappropriate comments toward resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made a subsequent visit for the allegations listed above. LPA met with Office Manger Marili Barajas and Administrator Nirjara Acharya. At initial visit 08/19/2021 the following occurred: The investigation consisted of the following: Interviews with Administrator, and Staff S1-S 3 from 9:15 AM to 11:00 AM. LPA Trueman requested Physician's Report, Needs and Services Plan, Emergency ID page and Hospice Documentation from Resident 1's file. At today's visit 09/01/2022 from 1:15 PM to 3:00 PM Resident's 1-8 were interviewed. In regards to Resident sustained pressure injuries while in care, Documentation from Hospice Agency for Resident R1 specifies Physician's Order start date 08/10/2021 and stop date 09/08/2021 L ankle wound and to cleanse with NS pat dry and cover with gauze every 2 to 3 days as needed. Documentation titled Skin Impairment Assessment from Hospice Agency dated 09/09/2021 stated that R1 has existing treatment for left ankle wouCDSS inspection report, September 1, 2022 · control 28-AS-20210818102537
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents are being exposed to cigarette smoke while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Sicairos conducted an unannounced complaint visit regarding the above stated allegation. LPA met with the Administrator Nirjara Acharya and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained copies of Staff & Resident Rosters. LPA toured the facility including common areas and smoking area. LPA also interviewed the Administrator, Staff #1 - Staff # 3, and Resident #1 - Resident #9. The investigation consisted of the following: in regards to the allegation "residents are being exposed to cigarette smoke while in care", it is alleged that residents smoke too closely to the main entrance door which causes the smoke to enter the lobby where other residents are then exposed to the cigarette smoke. LPA toured the main entrance/smoking area of the facility and observed several residents smoking in the designated smoking area which is located near the main entrance of the building. Staff members interviewed indicCDSS inspection report, June 21, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220614102941
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was stuck in facility elevator Facility elevator is not operating appropriately
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Lopez conducted a complaint visit to investigate the allegation listed above. LPA met with Manager Marili Barajas and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: Interviewed resident #1-9 (R1), Manager and five facility staff (S#1-S#5 were interviewed. LPA obtained resident and staff roster, SIR dated 5/08/22, 7 elevator repair invoices dated 09/17/21, 10/13/21, 12/03/21, 12/07/21, 03/02/22, 05/08/22, and 5/12/22, no elevator repair logs are kept by facilty and fax transmittal for 05/08/22 SIR Allegation: Resident was stuck in facility elevator Manager and 4/5 staff and 7/9 residents collaborated allegation that resident was stuck in elevator on 5/08/22 LPA tested elevator and it moved up and down properly, However, phone was not functioning and it was not known how long it has been in disrepair. Based on information and documentation received allegation is SUBSTANTIATED (continued on 9099C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 20, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220512163229
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff unlawfully evicted resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 04/29/2022 (11:00 AM), Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gail Johnson arrived at Burbank Senior Villa East, formerly named Le Bleu Chateau and conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit. LPA met with Manager Marili Barajas. LPA Johnson explained the purpose of today’s visit. Investigation consisted of the following: LPA reviewed and obtained the following documents: 30 day notice and fax receipt to CCL, rent payment invoices, R1 Resident Departure Form, Admission Agreement, County of Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department Receipt for Possession of Real Property (May 3, 2021), R1 Face Sheet, and R1 Physician’s report. LPA conducted interviews with House Manager Marili Barajas and R1. Conitnued on LIC-9099C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 29, 2022 · control 28-AS-20210416101629
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff stole resident's money.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vasallo conducted a subsequent complaint visit to investigate the allegation listed above. The initial complaint visit was conducted on 12/15/21. Licensee, Adam Zenou assisted with that visit. The investigation consisted of the following: During the initial visit, Resident #1's (R1) file was reviewed. Interviews were conducted with the Licensee and Business Office Manager. R1 is no longer a resident of the facility and therefore was not interviewed at the time. On 1/19/22, LPA discovered R1's whereabouts and R1 was interviewed. Also on 1/19/22, LPA contacted an investigator from the Social Security office to inquire about R1's social security funds. During today's subsequent visit, 7 residents were interviewed. The investigation revealed the following: It's alleged facility stole R1's social security money and stimulus checks. Facility was the payee for R1's social security funds. Facility records indicate R1 would receive money from facility staff whenCDSS inspection report, March 16, 2022 · control 28-AS-20211215131442

2021

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide a refund to resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vasallo conducted a complaint visit to investigate the allegation listed above. LPA met with Licensee, Adam Zenou and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: Resident #1 (R1) and two facility staff were interviewed. R1's file was reviewed including R1's admission agreement. The investigation revealed the following: It's alleged R1 was not provided a refund after moving out of the facility on 10/17/21. Allegedly R1 was verbally told he/she would receive a refund since R1 paid the rent for October 2021. R1 was interviewed and indicated that he/she did not provide the facility with a 30-day notice, but insisted that Staff #1 (S1) verbally promised a pro-rated refund from 10/18/21 - 10/31/21. S1 was interviewed and indicated he/she did not promise a refund. R1's admission agreement dated 5/1/20 states residents are required to provide a 30 day advance notice of intent to move. Continued on 9099C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 13, 2021 · control 28-AS-20211203111612
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedSuspicious death
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joe Katrdzhyan conducted an unannounced 10 day complaint visit to this facility. Upon arriving at the facility, LPA met with Office Manager / Marili Barajas and was later joined by the Administrator / William "Bill" Boles who assisted with the visit. LPA Katrdzhyan explained the purpose of today’s visit is to discuss the above mentioned allegation of "Suspicious death". During today's visit, LPA conducted interviews of various persons to include the Office Manager, Administrator, CEO / Adam Zenou and Residents 1 - 4 (R1 - R4). The investigation revealed the following; The details of this allegation stated that there was a suspicious death / murder in the facility. Based on interviews conducted, LPA discovered that there has been no such incident of a suspicious death or a murder at Burbank Retirement Villa East. Statements obtained were consistent and stated that the incident UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, October 19, 2021 · control 28-AS-20211018141120
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident does not attend scheduled appointments while in care. Resident's grooming needs have not been met while in care. Staff have not addressed a resident's change in medical condition while in care. Staff does not provide a comfortable environment for a resident while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elizabeth Irra conducted the initial 10-day investigation visit. LPA met with S-1 and discussed the purpose of today's visit. Facility Administrator (S-3) arrived at approximately 10 A.M.. During today's visit, LPA obtained the staff roster, resident roster, interviewed Staff #1 through Staff #4 (S-1 through S-4), interviewed Resident #1 through Resident #6 (R-1 through R-6) and obtained relevant documentation. Refer to LIC 9099C for the contination of this report. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 18, 2021 · control 28-AS-20211012134559
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff not providing residents medication in a timely manner. Staff failed to keep an accurate medication log. Staff failing to provide adequate food service. Staff failed to meet residents dietary needs. Staff failed to keep facility clean.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kruz Long conducted an unannounced complaint visit to this facility. The purpose of the visit was to gather information regarding the allegations and to complete the investigation. LPA met with Marili Barajas (House Manager) and explained the reason for the visit. During the initial visit conducted on 01/03/20, LPA obtained/reviewed a copy of the Staff/Resident roster, medication logs for Resident #1 through #7, interviewed Staff #1 in the staff dining room at 9:46 am, toured the facility at 11:03 am with Staff #1 and interviewed Resident #1 through #4 in the staff dining room between 11:28 am to 1:54 pm. During today's visit, LPA obtained a copy of the Staff schedule, Resident roster and food menu. LPA interviewed Resident #5 to #9 between 10:20 am to 11:30 am in the conference room, interviewed Staff #2 in the conference room at 11: 35 am and took a tour of the facility with Staff #2 at 11:45 am and interviewed Staff #3, #4, #5 and #6 in the conferenceCDSS inspection report, October 1, 2021 · control 28-AS-20191226095848
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not address a resident's hygiene needs while in care Resident has not been properly fed while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Liceising Program Analyst (LPA) Elizabeth Irra conducted an unannounced 10-day initial investigation for the above allegations. LPA met with Facility Administrator and discussed the purpose of today's visit. During today's visit, LPA obtained the Resident and Staff rosters,interviewed Staff #1 (S-1) through Staff #4 (S-4), interviewed Resident #1 (R-1) through Resident #6 (R-6) and obtained relevant documentation. Refer to LIC 9099C for the continuation of this report. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 20, 2021 · control 28-AS-20210914102641
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedA residents wheelchair was damaged while in care Staff did not provide necessary accommodations for a resident in care Staff are not providing resident with all medical records/incident reports Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angelica Rea conducted another visit to issue the final results of the investigation. LPA met with Administrator, William Boles who assisted with today's visit. Regarding the allegation that a former residents wheelchair was damaged while in care and staff did not provide necessary accomodations for resident in care, the investigation consisted of interviews with Administrator, Staff #1 and Resident #1 - Resident #6. Administrator and Staff #1 stated that they were not aware that former resident's wheelchair was damaged while in care. They stated that it was not brought to their attention. Administrator and Staff #1 stated that staff do provide necessary accomodations for residents in care. LPA interviewed 6 Residents who use wheelchair(s). 5 out of 6 residents stated that they have no trouble with the accomodations provided, and have no trouble maneuvering their wheelchair(s) at the facilty. 6 out of 6 residents stated that their wheelchair has not beenCDSS inspection report, August 25, 2021 · control 28-AS-20210730123119
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is financially abusing resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
An unannounced subsequent complaint visit was conducted on this day by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)Wendell Smith . Upon arrival LPA met with administrator Bill Boles and explained the reason for this visit. Regarding the allegation listed above it is being alleged that the Licensee/Administrator stole resident 1 (R1's) identity, opened a bank account under his name and that his social security Income SSI is being deposited into this new account. Additionally, it is being alleged that administrator stole a money order from R1 in the amount of $500.00. Initial 10-day complaint visit was conducted on 5/13/2020 by LPA Yelena Avetisyan. During the visit LPA Avetisyan conducted interview with the administrator and requested document to be submitted related to the allegation listed above. Additionally, on 5/15/2020 LPA Avetisyan conducted interview with Resident 1 (R1). UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 16, 2021 · control 31-AS-20200508134915

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 93 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
5
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
8
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
16
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
69
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
93
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(818) 843-3141
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Savant Of Burbank East? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.