Ivy Park At Cerritos is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Cerritos, Los Angeles County, California — state license #198602608, licensed for 163 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 36 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 5, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

3 homes in view

Ivy Park At Cerritos

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 163 residents · Cerritos, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedMemory careHospiceBedriddenWheelchair not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #198602608, held since 2018 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
11000 New Falcon Way · Cerritos, Los Angeles County
Phone
(562) 865-9500
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file — ask the home
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careVerified in record

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 163 NON- AMBULATOR. HOSPICE APPROVED FOR 25. ALL (8) BEDRIDDEN ON FIRST FLOOR GROUND LEVEL, ONLY APARTMENTS# 101, 102, 103, 132, 136, 138, 139, 141, ARE DESIGNATED FOR BEDRIDDEN CLIENTS.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 43 times and filed 36 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated May 5, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 9, 2026
Occupancy at the February 1, 2024 visit
135 of 163 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 17 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 11, 2021 to February 1, 2024. 17 of the 17 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (14). 17 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 17 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 24 of 36 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20264 state visits · 5 documents
May 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 2, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 19, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20255 state visits · 5 documents
Jul 31, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20248 state visits · 9 documents
Sep 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not ensure pre-admission appraisal was done correctly Facility did not issue the correct refund amount

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Wong conducted a “Subsequent” visit to ascertain additional information regarding the above-mentioned allegation(s) and for the purpose of rendering the findings. LPA met with Staff #1 Randyl Lowe (Receptionist) who allowed entry into the facility and was later met by Administrator Laura Rodriguez who assisted with the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 12/20/22, LPA Wong interviewed the administrator, 4 staff (S1-S4) and 13 residents (R2-R14) and obtained the current staff roster and resident roster. On 6/28/2022, Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Sicairos conducted an initial 10-day complaint and obtained copies of Staff & Resident Rosters, reviewed Former Resident #1 (FR1) file, and obtained copies of Identification and Emergency Information Sheet, Physician's Report, Admission Agreement, Service Plan, Progress Notes, Resident Appraisal, Admission Orders, and Resident Detail Ledger. LPA interviewed Ms. Mosalla and Staff #1 (S1). (Sethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 1, 2024 · control 28-AS-20220623080038
Jan 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not maintain facility at a comfortable temperature for resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Laura Rodriguez Executive Director and explained the reason for the visit. During the visit, LPA Lopez conducted a tour of the facility with Executive Director Laura Rodriguez. LPA Lopez interviewed Executive Director S1, 4 staff S2 through S5 and total of thirteen (13) residents who shall be referred to as R1 through R13. LPA Lopez obtained staff roster, resident roster, one (1) month of work orders, Report from specialty A/C and heat dated 12/01/2023 R1’s physician report, referral for R1 to Physician dated 12/23/2023. LPA took photos of the thermostats in the facility common areas and random rooms. (Continued on 9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 18, 2024 · control 28-AS-20231219092627
20234 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 4, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not maintaining a comfortable room temperature for resident.

On 12/04/2023 at 08:00 a.m., Licensing Program Analyst(s) (LPA) Jewel Baptiste and Sanjay Vaid conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation regarding the above allegation(s). LPAs met with Laura Rodriguez Executive Director and explained the reason for the visit. During the visit on 11/30/2023, LPA Baptiste conducted a tour of the facility. LPA checked the thermostat in rooms #117,163,179,201, 210, 219, and 227 with Executive Director Laura Rodriguez. LPA Baptiste interviewed Executive Director and a total of five (5) residents who shall be referred to as R1 through R5. LPA Baptiste obtained staff roster, resident roster, one (1) month of work orders, Ontario Refrigeration dated 6/9/2023, Report from specialty A/C and heat dated 11/28/2023, R1’s physician report, and photos from Executive Director regarding the thermostat in room#117. LPA took photos of the thermostats in the facility common areas. Report Continued on 9099c Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 4, 2023 · control 28-AS-20231121100332
Oct 10, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility failed to provide a safe environment for residents Facility failed to provide a comfortable temperature for residents

On 10/10/23 at 8:34 a.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jewel Baptiste conducted two unannounced complaint visits in-conjunction. Upon arrival LPA was greeted by receptionist and activites director Chelsea Vandueck. The Executive Director Laura Rodriguez arrive at 9:50 and LPA explained the purpose of the visit. During the initial investigation on 3/14/2023: A physical plant tour and interviews with staff (S1-S2), and resident (R1-R3). The following documents were obtained: Photo of the thermostats, Staff schedule, admissions agreement, Evacuation order, LIC 500 Personnel Report, and resident roster. Report continued on 9099c Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230307090726
Oct 10, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not assist resident with ADLs Staff did not meet resident's needs

On 10/10/23 at 8:34 a.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jewel Baptiste conducted two unannounced complaint visits in-conjunction. Upon arrival LPA was greeted by receptionist and activites director Chelsea Vandueck. The Executive Director Laura Rodriguez arrive at 9:50 and LPA explained the purpose of the visit. During the initial investigation on 10/03/2023: LPA obtained resident roster, staff roster, R1 admissions agreement, R1’s physicians report, R1’s Hospice plan of care, R1’s resident assessment, R1’s resident information form, R1’s hospice treatment plan, R1’s physicians orders from hospice agency. LPA interviewed: The residential care director and (1) staff who shall be referred to as S1. LPA interviewed a total of ten (10) residents who shall be referred to as: R2 through R11. LPA also interviewed a former resident who shall be referred to as R1. LPA interviewed resident family members and hospice agency who shall be referred to as witness #1 (W1) and witness #2 (W2). LPA isthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230925081542
Sep 14, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 15, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 1
Type B citations9typical 1
Substantiated complaints9typical 2
Total complaints25typical 7
State visits on file43typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2018.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202645020255502024890202367020229922021331
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Ask how the 2022 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (562) 865-9500

Is Ivy Park At Cerritos licensed?

Yes — Ivy Park At Cerritos is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Cerritos (Los Angeles County): California license #198602608, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 163 residents. State records list 36 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 5, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Ivy Park At Cerritos care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Ivy Park At Cerritos with clearances for dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list wheelchair / non-ambulatory. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 163 NON- AMBULATOR. HOSPICE APPROVED FOR 25. ALL (8) BEDRIDDEN ON FIRST FLOOR GROUND LEVEL, ONLY APARTMENTS# 101, 102, 103, 132, 136, 138, 139, 141, ARE DESIGNATED FOR BEDRIDDEN CLIENTS.

How much does Ivy Park At Cerritos cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Ivy Park At Cerritos's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Ivy Park At Cerritos accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Ivy Park At Cerritos is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

135 of 163 beds occupied (83%) when the state visited on February 1, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Ivy Park At Cerritos?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 43 state visits and 36 dated documents since 2021 for Ivy Park At Cerritos; 17 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated February 1, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

17 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not ensure pre-admission appraisal was done correctly Facility did not issue the correct refund amount
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Wong conducted a “Subsequent” visit to ascertain additional information regarding the above-mentioned allegation(s) and for the purpose of rendering the findings. LPA met with Staff #1 Randyl Lowe (Receptionist) who allowed entry into the facility and was later met by Administrator Laura Rodriguez who assisted with the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 12/20/22, LPA Wong interviewed the administrator, 4 staff (S1-S4) and 13 residents (R2-R14) and obtained the current staff roster and resident roster. On 6/28/2022, Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Sicairos conducted an initial 10-day complaint and obtained copies of Staff & Resident Rosters, reviewed Former Resident #1 (FR1) file, and obtained copies of Identification and Emergency Information Sheet, Physician's Report, Admission Agreement, Service Plan, Progress Notes, Resident Appraisal, Admission Orders, and Resident Detail Ledger. LPA interviewed Ms. Mosalla and Staff #1 (S1). (SeCDSS inspection report, February 1, 2024 · control 28-AS-20220623080038
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not maintain facility at a comfortable temperature for resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Laura Rodriguez Executive Director and explained the reason for the visit. During the visit, LPA Lopez conducted a tour of the facility with Executive Director Laura Rodriguez. LPA Lopez interviewed Executive Director S1, 4 staff S2 through S5 and total of thirteen (13) residents who shall be referred to as R1 through R13. LPA Lopez obtained staff roster, resident roster, one (1) month of work orders, Report from specialty A/C and heat dated 12/01/2023 R1’s physician report, referral for R1 to Physician dated 12/23/2023. LPA took photos of the thermostats in the facility common areas and random rooms. (Continued on 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 18, 2024 · control 28-AS-20231219092627

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not maintaining a comfortable room temperature for resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 12/04/2023 at 08:00 a.m., Licensing Program Analyst(s) (LPA) Jewel Baptiste and Sanjay Vaid conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation regarding the above allegation(s). LPAs met with Laura Rodriguez Executive Director and explained the reason for the visit. During the visit on 11/30/2023, LPA Baptiste conducted a tour of the facility. LPA checked the thermostat in rooms #117,163,179,201, 210, 219, and 227 with Executive Director Laura Rodriguez. LPA Baptiste interviewed Executive Director and a total of five (5) residents who shall be referred to as R1 through R5. LPA Baptiste obtained staff roster, resident roster, one (1) month of work orders, Ontario Refrigeration dated 6/9/2023, Report from specialty A/C and heat dated 11/28/2023, R1’s physician report, and photos from Executive Director regarding the thermostat in room#117. LPA took photos of the thermostats in the facility common areas. Report Continued on 9099c UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 4, 2023 · control 28-AS-20231121100332
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to provide a safe environment for residents Facility failed to provide a comfortable temperature for residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/10/23 at 8:34 a.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jewel Baptiste conducted two unannounced complaint visits in-conjunction. Upon arrival LPA was greeted by receptionist and activites director Chelsea Vandueck. The Executive Director Laura Rodriguez arrive at 9:50 and LPA explained the purpose of the visit. During the initial investigation on 3/14/2023: A physical plant tour and interviews with staff (S1-S2), and resident (R1-R3). The following documents were obtained: Photo of the thermostats, Staff schedule, admissions agreement, Evacuation order, LIC 500 Personnel Report, and resident roster. Report continued on 9099c UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 10, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230307090726
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not assist resident with ADLs Staff did not meet resident's needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/10/23 at 8:34 a.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jewel Baptiste conducted two unannounced complaint visits in-conjunction. Upon arrival LPA was greeted by receptionist and activites director Chelsea Vandueck. The Executive Director Laura Rodriguez arrive at 9:50 and LPA explained the purpose of the visit. During the initial investigation on 10/03/2023: LPA obtained resident roster, staff roster, R1 admissions agreement, R1’s physicians report, R1’s Hospice plan of care, R1’s resident assessment, R1’s resident information form, R1’s hospice treatment plan, R1’s physicians orders from hospice agency. LPA interviewed: The residential care director and (1) staff who shall be referred to as S1. LPA interviewed a total of ten (10) residents who shall be referred to as: R2 through R11. LPA also interviewed a former resident who shall be referred to as R1. LPA interviewed resident family members and hospice agency who shall be referred to as witness #1 (W1) and witness #2 (W2). LPA isCDSS inspection report, October 10, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230925081542
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not provide resident's medical records to resident's medical provider Facility is charging resident for services that are not needed Facility did not accept resident back to the facility after a hospitalization Illegal eviction
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elizabeth Irra conducted a subsequent visit to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Lilit Chaparyan and discussed the purpose of today's visit. The initial 10-day investigation visit was conducted on 06/30/21 by LPA Linda Almaraz. During this visit, LPA Almaraz conducted a complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Brittney Buchannan and discussed the reason this visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA interviewed the Administrator and attempted to interview former Administrator, Krystal Jenkins, but is no longer an employee at the facility. LPA also attempted to speak to Staff #1 who was not present at the facility. LPA was not able to interview Resident #1 since the resident is no longer at the facility. LPA requested facility staff and resident roster, and Resident #1's file. Refer to LIC 9099C for the continuation of this report. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 2, 2023 · control 28-AS-20210622103648
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents air conditioner is in disrepair. Staff is not serving food timely. Staff is putting chemicals in the water that residents utilize. Facility toaster in disrepair.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez conducted a subsequent complaint visit stemming from initial 10-day complaint visit on 02/17/2022. LPA was met by Staff (S1) and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: An inspection of the interior and exterior physical plant was conducted. Staff (S1-S6) and residents (R1- R6) were interviewed. Resident (R1) was not present, and LPA attempted to interview telephonically. LPA requested and obtained the following documents: LIC 500 Personnel Report, Resident roster, Invoices for A/C and heating repair, and invoices for toaster appliance. See LIC 9099C for report continuation. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 21, 2023 · control 28-AS-20220211102513

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident is not being rotated resulting in pressure injuries. Resident's medication is not being administered. Resident's diapering needs are not being met. Facility staff are not following resident's dietary needs.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
***This report supersedes the reports dated on 6/7/22. The allegation - Resident's medication is not being administered, had been reassessed and the finding has been revised from unsubstantiated to substantiated. The other allegations remain substantiated.*** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations. LPA met with the Executive Director, Lilit Chaparyan, and explained the purpose of the visit. Investigation consisted of the following: On the initial visit dated 1/15/21, LPA conducted a video call to review the food supplies, physical plant, and the medication room. LPA requested copies of the staff roster to include the contact numbers, food menu, and documents for Residents #1 - #5: Physician’s Report, Appraisal/Needs & Services Plan, Hospice and/or facility notes, MAR log for October 2020 through January 2021. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 30, 2022 · control 28-AS-20210114084218
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not dispense correct medications to resident Facility staff did not provide care to resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Wong conducted a subsequent complaint visit to investigate the above allegations and LPA met with Receptionist Teresa Picos and explained the reason of the visit. Shortly after, LPA met with Business Office Manger Carment Hernandez and Executive Director Lilit Chaparyan and assisted with the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 6/28/22, LPA Sicairos obtained copies of Staff & Resident Rosters. LPA reviewed Former Resident #1 (FR1) file and obtained copies of Identification and Emergency Information Sheet, Physician's Report, Admission Agreement, Service Plan, Progress Notes, Resident Appraisal, Admission Orders, and Resident Detail Ledger. LPA interviewed Ms. Mosalla and Staff #1 (S1). On today's visit, LPA Wong interviewed the administrator, 4 staff (S1-S4) and 13 residents (R2-R14) and obtained current staff roster and resident roster. (See LIC 9099C for continuation) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 20, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220623080038
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not maintaining a comfortable room temperature for resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bennette Pena conducted a subsequent visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Business Office Director, Nicole Reyes and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the initial visit on 10/10/2022, LPA obtained a copy of the staff/resident roster, work order for the A/C unit and Resident #1 (R1) file, interviewed Resident #1-#4 (R1-R4), Staff #1-3 (S1-3). LPA conducted a tour of the facility which included the front entrance, common areas, hallways, inspected (9) resident rooms (Rooms #103, #108, #112, #114, #115, #117, #123, #127 and #129) and verified thermostat readings.The temperature readings were between 78-80 deg. F which is within Title 22 Regulations. LPA requested copies of the maintenance log for the last 3 months to be sent to LPA's email by end of the business day on 10/11/2022. During today’s visit, LPA continued the interviews with Resident #5-13 (R5-R13), Staff #4-5 (S4-S5), reviewed service reports and work order detailCDSS inspection report, October 17, 2022 · control 28-AS-20221003120259
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff mismanaged resident's medication. Staff does not prevent inappropriate interaction between residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 9/29/2022 at 10:17 a.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jewel Baptiste conducted an unannounced complaint investigation to the facility. Upon arrival LPA met with Lililit Chaparyan (Executive Director) and explained the purpose of the visit. During today’s visit LPA toured the facility with the executive director and the wellness director (Staff #1), obtained resident/ staff roster, statement from Staff 4 regarding R1, R1’s physician’s orders dated 7/21/2021, 8/24/2021, and 9/29/2022. LPA interviewed residents R1 through R12. LPA Interviewed executive director, Staff S1, S2, and S3. Report continued on 9099C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 29, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220923154026
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident is being intimidated while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Sicairos conducted an unannounced complaint visit regarding the above stated allegation. LPA met with Sahar Mosalla and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained copies of Staff & Resident Rosters. LPA reviewed Resident #1 (R1) file and obtained copies of Physician's Report, Appraisal, and ID Emeregency Info Sheet. LPA also interviewed the Administrator, Staff #1 (S1) - Staff #4 (S4) and Resident #1 (R1) - Resident #11 (R11). The investigation revealed the following: in regards to the allegation "resident is being intimidated while in care", it is alleged that there is a male staff member who intimidates residents by staring at them intensely while they are having dinner. The name of the alleged staff member is unknown. 5 out of 5 staff members interviewed denied the allegation. Staff members interviewed denied initimidating any of the residents at the facility or being aware of any other staff mCDSS inspection report, July 13, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220705131522
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident is not being rotated resulting in pressure injuries. Resident's diapering needs are not being met. Facility staff are not following resident's dietary needs.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above three allegations. LPA met with the Director of Assisted Living, Kianny Soto, and Executive Director, Sahar Mosalla, to explain the purpose of the visit. Investigation consisted of the following: On the initial visit dated 1/15/21, LPA conducted a video call to review the food supplies, physical plant, and the medication room. LPA requested copies of the staff roster to include the contact numbers, food menu, and documents for Residents #1 - #5: Physician’s Report, Appraisal/Needs & Services Plan, Hospice and/or facility notes, MAR log for October 2020 through January 2021. On 9/30/21, LPA Chan conducted an on-site visit to interview 4 Staff and 10 Residents. LPA requested for the staff roster, resident roster, and facility notes pertaining to Resident #1. The allegation – Resident is not being rotated resulting in pressure injuries was investigated by an InvestigatCDSS inspection report, June 7, 2022 · control 28-AS-20210114084218
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vasallo conducted a subsequent complaint visit. LPA met with Business Manager, Carmen Galicia and explained the reason for the visit. The initial complaint visit was conducted by LPA Nina Galarza on 11/10/21. The investigation consisted of the following: During the initial visit, LPA Galarza interviewed Director of Assisted Living, La'Keisha Phillips. During today's visit, LPA Vasallo interviewed 6 staff which included caregiver, Medication Technician's (Med Tech) and front office staff. LPA also interviewed 4 residents. Resident #1's (R1) file was reviewed which included assessments, medication records, progress notes and incident reports. The investigation revealed the following: It's alleged R1 had a change of condition on 10/24/21 and staff failed to call 911 in a timely manner. Facility documented the incident on a report. According to the report, a staff member notified R1's family that R1 appeared to be weak and needed assistance with toileting. CCDSS inspection report, April 19, 2022 · control 28-AS-20211104142735
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFood service is inadequate. Resident is not provided privacy.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nune Margaryan conducted a subsequent complaint visit to complete the investigation and deliver findings for the allegations listed above. LPA met with Business Manager Carmen Galicia and explain the purpose for today’s visit. The initial visit was conducted by LPA Nune Margaryan on 02/11/22 . During the visit, LPA Nune Margaryan interviewed the Business Manager, Staff #1-4 (S1-S4), and Residents #1-14 (R1-R14). LPA also collected a copies of the staff roster, resident roster, menus for residents food. Continue 9099C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 18, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220203110548

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 43 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
9
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
9
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
25
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
43
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(562) 865-9500
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Ivy Park At Cerritos? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.