Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Montrose, Los Angeles County, California — state license #197609594, licensed for 131 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 11 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated March 28, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

1 home in view

Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 131 residents · Montrose, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #197609594, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
2640 Honolulu Ave · Montrose, Los Angeles County
Phone
(818) 248-6737
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 131 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 10 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 20 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 131 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. 20 ROOMS ON THE 1ST FLOOR FOR BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE CARE WAIVER FOR 10. NEW MANAGMENT COMPANY, SH1 SHORELINE MGMT, LLC, EFFECTIVE 6/6/2022.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 16 times and filed 11 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated March 28, 2026.

Most recent state visit
March 28, 2026
Occupancy at the May 1, 2025 visit
70 of 131 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 12 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 7, 2022 to May 1, 2025. 12 of the 12 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (11). 12 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 12 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 7 of 11 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Mar 28, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 3 documents
May 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure adequate care and supervision is provided to residents in care. Staff spoke inappropriately while in front of resident.

This is an addendum to the Licensing report previously issued on 04/15/2024. Licensing program Analyst (LPA) Leizl DeLaCerra conducted announced subsequent visit to the facility on 05/01/25 to deliver the findings. LPA met the administrator and explained the purpose of the visit Allegation: Staff do not ensure adequate care and supervision is provided to residents in care. It was alleged that due to lack of supervision, resident #1 (R1) spent the night in the flooded room on 4/08/2024 and staff did not check on R1 until next morning”. To investigate this allegation. LPA Rosaura Valenzuela conducted an initial visit and delivered findings on 4/15/2024. During LPA de la Cerra's subsequent visit, 0n 4/24/2025. LPA conducted physical plant tour, conducted record reviews and staff interviews between 10:30am to 12:00pm and 1:30pm to 3:00pm, resident interviews were conducted between 12:30pm to 1:30pm. LPA obtained the staff roster, resident list, and gathered additional documents pertainingthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2025 · control 31-AS-20240410154700
Mar 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 31, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff sexually abused resident in care. Staff did not report incident to the proper agencies.

An unannounced subsequent complaint visit was conducted on this day by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Panushkina to issue the findings of the above listed allegations. Upon arrival, LPA met with the Executive Director, Bill Heady, and explained the reason for the visit. On 07/28/23, the Woodland Hills South Adult and Senior Care Regional Office received a complaint regarding the allegations, “Staff sexually abused resident in care” and “Staff did not report incident to the proper agencies”. The complaint was referred to Community Care Licensing Division’s Investigations Branch. The complaint was assigned to Investigator, Laarni Santiago. On 07/31/23, LPA Ruiz initiated the complaint. LPA conducted tour of the facility and obtained copies of pertinent information which include but not limited to R1’s Physician’s Report (dated on 11/01/21). Continue on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 31, 2025 · control 31-AS-20230728111241
20243 state visits · 3 documents
May 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not following proper reporting requirement Resident care needs are not being met by facility staff

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Business Office Manager Helen Kirkorian and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:42 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:18 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that resident care needs are not being met by facility staff, it was alleged that Residents are complaining about quality of care and multiple issues with resident care needs. LPA's interview with six (6) residents on 03/13/24 between 12:30 PM to 2:00 PM and another six (6) residents today between 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM revealed that twelve (12) out of twelve (12) residents or about 20% of current census stated that the staff are respectful and provide all the care that they need and the quality of care are to their satisfaction. Nthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230308135842
Mar 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is unsafe for residents in care due to unsecured access ways Residents are not provided proper medication assistance

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Gary Tan and Ray Comer conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPAs met with interim Administrator Tracy Waite as the current administrator is indisposed and explained the reason for the visit. LPAs conducted physical plant tour at around 9:40 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:10 AM, reviewed records between 10:30 AM to 11:40 AM and interviewed residents and staff between 12:30 PM to 2:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that Facility is unsafe for residents in care due to unsecured access ways, it was alleged that there is an issue regarding residents' safety and elopement from unsecured access ways in Memory Care Unit. LPAs observation during today's visit revealed that the access ways in the Memory Care units are secured and all the delayed egress and all safety protocol are in place. LPAs' interview with the maintenance staff at 12:30the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 13, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230308135842
Feb 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints2typical 2
Total complaints7typical 7
State visits on file16typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026110202533020243302022791
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (818) 248-6737

Is Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living licensed?

Yes — Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Montrose (Los Angeles County): California license #197609594, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 131 residents. State records list 11 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated March 28, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 131 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. 20 ROOMS ON THE 1ST FLOOR FOR BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE CARE WAIVER FOR 10. NEW MANAGMENT COMPANY, SH1 SHORELINE MGMT, LLC, EFFECTIVE 6/6/2022.

How much does Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

70 of 131 beds occupied (53%) when the state visited on May 1, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 16 state visits and 11 dated documents since 2022 for Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living; 12 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 1, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

12 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure adequate care and supervision is provided to residents in care. Staff spoke inappropriately while in front of resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
This is an addendum to the Licensing report previously issued on 04/15/2024. Licensing program Analyst (LPA) Leizl DeLaCerra conducted announced subsequent visit to the facility on 05/01/25 to deliver the findings. LPA met the administrator and explained the purpose of the visit Allegation: Staff do not ensure adequate care and supervision is provided to residents in care. It was alleged that due to lack of supervision, resident #1 (R1) spent the night in the flooded room on 4/08/2024 and staff did not check on R1 until next morning”. To investigate this allegation. LPA Rosaura Valenzuela conducted an initial visit and delivered findings on 4/15/2024. During LPA de la Cerra's subsequent visit, 0n 4/24/2025. LPA conducted physical plant tour, conducted record reviews and staff interviews between 10:30am to 12:00pm and 1:30pm to 3:00pm, resident interviews were conducted between 12:30pm to 1:30pm. LPA obtained the staff roster, resident list, and gathered additional documents pertainingCDSS inspection report, May 1, 2025 · control 31-AS-20240410154700
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff sexually abused resident in care. Staff did not report incident to the proper agencies.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
An unannounced subsequent complaint visit was conducted on this day by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Panushkina to issue the findings of the above listed allegations. Upon arrival, LPA met with the Executive Director, Bill Heady, and explained the reason for the visit. On 07/28/23, the Woodland Hills South Adult and Senior Care Regional Office received a complaint regarding the allegations, “Staff sexually abused resident in care” and “Staff did not report incident to the proper agencies”. The complaint was referred to Community Care Licensing Division’s Investigations Branch. The complaint was assigned to Investigator, Laarni Santiago. On 07/31/23, LPA Ruiz initiated the complaint. LPA conducted tour of the facility and obtained copies of pertinent information which include but not limited to R1’s Physician’s Report (dated on 11/01/21). Continue on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 31, 2025 · control 31-AS-20230728111241

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not following proper reporting requirement Resident care needs are not being met by facility staff
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Business Office Manager Helen Kirkorian and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:42 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:18 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that resident care needs are not being met by facility staff, it was alleged that Residents are complaining about quality of care and multiple issues with resident care needs. LPA's interview with six (6) residents on 03/13/24 between 12:30 PM to 2:00 PM and another six (6) residents today between 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM revealed that twelve (12) out of twelve (12) residents or about 20% of current census stated that the staff are respectful and provide all the care that they need and the quality of care are to their satisfaction. NCDSS inspection report, May 23, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230308135842
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is unsafe for residents in care due to unsecured access ways Residents are not provided proper medication assistance
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Gary Tan and Ray Comer conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPAs met with interim Administrator Tracy Waite as the current administrator is indisposed and explained the reason for the visit. LPAs conducted physical plant tour at around 9:40 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:10 AM, reviewed records between 10:30 AM to 11:40 AM and interviewed residents and staff between 12:30 PM to 2:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that Facility is unsafe for residents in care due to unsecured access ways, it was alleged that there is an issue regarding residents' safety and elopement from unsecured access ways in Memory Care Unit. LPAs observation during today's visit revealed that the access ways in the Memory Care units are secured and all the delayed egress and all safety protocol are in place. LPAs' interview with the maintenance staff at 12:30CDSS inspection report, March 13, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230308135842

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents hygiene needs are not being met Staff did not seek medical attention for resident in care Staff have not given resident medication
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Resident Care Coordinator Veronica Sanchez and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:34 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:02 AM, reviewed records between 10:15 to 12:00 PM and interviewed staff and 12:10 PM to 2:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that residents hygiene needs are not being met, it was alleged that the Resident #1 (R1)'s hair was dirty and R1's teeth were dirty like they had not been washed and brushed for a while. LPA's record review revealed that R1's was showered and body inspected as scheduled unless R1 refused. (continued on LIC 9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 9, 2022 · control 31-AS-20210519142527
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained a bruise while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosaura Valenzuela made a unannounced subsequent visit for the above noted allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Ernest Lewis and explained the reason for the visit. It was alleged that on 02/17/2022 Resident #1 (R1) had been injured and sustained a bruise while in care. To investigate this allegation on 03/15/22 at 1:00pm and on 09/11/2022 at 11:00am, LPA inspected the facility and R1’s room. At the time of this visit between 11:15am and 12:00pm, LPA interviewed two current staff. Furthermore, LPA Valenzuela made an attempt to speak with facility staff #1 (S1) and staff #2 (S2) who were assisting R1 in the month of February 2022 and was informed that both staff no longer work at the facility. Staff interviews revealed that Resident # 1 (R1) was observed to be scratching their face all the time. R1’s nails were noted to be long and were recently trimmed by the hospice agency. Staff believe that on 02/17/2022 R1 sustained injuries, due to scratchingCDSS inspection report, September 15, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220314112215
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not follow Dr. orders Medications were accessible to resident in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Ernest Lewis and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:35 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation and reviewed records between 10:00 AM to 12:00 PM. LPA also interviewed staff between 12:15 AM to 1:30 PM. Regarding the allegation that the staff did not follow orders, it was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) resident supposed to have one (1) patch to put on his back daily but was found to have two (2) patches on R1's chest on 05/03/21. LPA's record review today between 10:00 AM to 12:00 PM, revealed that R1 was prescribed one (1) patch for every twenty four (24) hours. Photo evidence provided by the witness revealed that R1 had two (2) patches on R1's chest. (continued on LIC 9099-C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 15, 2022 · control 31-AS-20210519142527
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not seek medical attention for resident Staff did not notify responsible party of resident's injury.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Rosaura Valenzuela conducted an unannounced subsequent visit for the above noted allegations. LPA met with Veronica Sanchez, Resident Care Coordinator The purpose of the visit was discussed. It was reported that staff did not seek medical attention for resident #1 (R1) when they sustained an injury. On 3/15/2022 at 3:02pm, staff interviews were initiated. Interviews revealed that staff did seek medical attention for R1. Facility informed R1's primary care physician and hospice agency. On 9/11/2022 between 12:30pm and 1:30pm, LPA Valenzuela reviewed R1's records. Records reviewed confirmed what staff had told LPA, On 2/18/2022 the hospice agency staff came to the facility to assess R1. Hospice staff noted that R1 was not in distress or pain at the time. According to hospice staff the injury looked better. Based on interview and record review there is insufficient information to support this allegation, therefore it is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. UnsubsCDSS inspection report, September 11, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220314112215
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident's clothes are dirty Residents clothes are missing
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with staff Veronica Sanchez and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:35 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation and reviewed records between 10:00 AM to 11:30 AM. LPA also interviewed staff and residents between 11:30 AM to 1:30 PM. Regarding the allegation that Resident's clothes are missing, it was alleged that Resident #1 (R1)'s underwear and clothes are missing, LPA's record review at 10:00 AM, revealed that R1's Power of Attorney (POA) did not declare any personal belongings on the inventory section of R1's Admission Agreement. LPA's observation during physical plant tour at 9:35 AM also revealed that R1 has a walk in closet full of clothes. (continued to LIC 9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 11, 2022 · control 31-AS-20210519142527
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not cleaning resident(s) rooms Insufficient staffing to meet the needs of the resident(s) Resident(s) call lights not answered timely
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with staff Lizette Halili and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant at 9:35 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:20 AM and interviewed residents and staff between 10:50 AM to 2:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that staff are not cleaning resident(s) rooms, it was alleged that no one is cleaning residents' room as they were dirty and unkempt. LPA's interview with nine (9) residents or more than 14% of current census, today between 10:50 AM to 2:00 PM revealed that nine (9) out of nine (9) residents stated that staff clean their room everyday and do general cleaning once a week. LPA's observation on 08/17/22 at 10:35 AM also revealed that twelve (12) out of twelve (12) room visited were clean and in proper order. (continued on LIC 9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 20, 2022 · control 31-AS-20201124081727
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedInsufficient clean linens to meet the resident(s) needs Resident(s) room is malodorous
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Gary Tan and Rosaura Valenzuela conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPAs met with Executive Director Ernest Lewis and explained the reason for the visit. LPAs conducted physical plant tour at 10:20 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 11:00 AM and interviewed Executive Director and staff between 11:15 AM to 1:30 PM. Regarding the allegation the there is insufficient linens to meet resident(s) needs, it was alleged that residents are sleeping on dirty sheets and there are not enough sheets for residents in care. LPAs observation today at around 10:35 AM revealed that there are sufficient linens in stock at the facility's multiple linen storage. LPAs also visited twelve (12) residents' room during physical plant tour and observed that twelve (12) out of twelve (12) rooms visited, linens were clean and in good condition. LPAs interview witCDSS inspection report, August 17, 2022 · control 31-AS-20201124081727
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is not providing resident’s medication as prescribed. Resident was left in the soiled diaper for extended period of time. Resident not being provided medical attention in a timely manner.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosaura Valenzuela conducted an unannounced visit to investigate the above noted allegations. LPA met with Ernest Lewis, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. It was reported that staff is not providing resident's medication as prescribed. To investigate this allegation on 7/07/2022 at 1:00pm, LPA Valenzuela initiated staff interviews. Interviews revealed that Resident #1 (R1) is being given their medication. At 2:15pm, LPA Valenzuela reviewed R1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the months of June and July of 2022. LPA did not observe any discrepancies. The M.A.R. for the month of June indicated that R1 did not receive medication from 6/12-6/20/22 due to the fact that they were not in the community. Also, one cream was not administered on 6/24 and 6/25 of 2022 because the facility had not received the medication. Besides the dates mentioned previously, according to the M.A.R. and staff interviews, R1 has been receiving thCDSS inspection report, July 7, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220701095734

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 16 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
7
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
16
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(818) 248-6737
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.