Large community · Licensed for 131 · Montrose
Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living
2640 Honolulu Ave, Montrose, CA 91020Licensed since 2019
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Languages spoken: EnglishReported on Caring.com · September 9, 2026
- Licensed for 131: a large care communityThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 131 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 10 residents
- Bedriddenup to 20 residents
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 131 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. 20 ROOMS ON THE 1ST FLOOR FOR BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE CARE WAIVER FOR 10. NEW MANAGMENT COMPANY, SH1 SHORELINE MGMT, LLC, EFFECTIVE 6/6/2022.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
Care services
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Works with hospice
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Pharmacy services on site
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Training topics namedStaff trained in memory careWe don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Secured building entry
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
As needs change
Medicines
Level of medication service: reminders only
Caring.com · September 9, 2026
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 10 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living: two-person transfers or a lift and who is awake overnight. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$4,300a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
Monthly cost breakdownWith a studio and basic help · room, care and fees$4,300likely a month
Starting monthly rate$4,300this home
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living studio, seen September 9, 2026.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,300–$4,900
- $4,300
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,300–$8,450
- $6,800
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes24 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,500 to $10,995
24 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,100–$6,000.
- Glen Terra Assisted LivingGlendale · 3.6 mi · Large community$3,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Belmont Village BurbankBurbank · 4.3 mi · Large community$6,100Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Atria GlendaleGlendale · 4.9 mi · Large community$4,595Listed on its own website · seen October 27, 2026
- Ararat GardensGlendale · 5.0 mi · Large community$4,130Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Savant of Burbank WestBurbank · 5.2 mi · Large community$3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Glen Park at Glendale - Mariposa StGlendale · 5.4 mi · Large community$5,286Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Glen Park at Glendale - Boynton StGlendale · 5.4 mi · Large community$5,286Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Leisure Vale Assisted LivingGlendale · 5.5 mi · Large community$3,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- MontecedroAltadena · 6.1 mi · Large community$5,544Listed on its own website · starting rate with entrance fee contract · seen October 27, 2026
- Ivy Park at BurbankBurbank · 6.4 mi · Large community$5,395Listed on its own website · studio apartments · seen October 27, 2026
- Villa GardensPasadena · 7.0 mi · Large community$10,995Listed on its own website · seen October 5, 2026
- Astoria Park Senior LivingPasadena · 7.1 mi · Large community$3,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Pasadena HighlandsPasadena · 7.3 mi · Large community$5,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Evergreen RetirementBurbank · 7.3 mi · Large community$2,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Morningstar of PasadenaPasadena · 7.4 mi · Large community$6,825Listed on its own website · assisted living starting rate · seen October 27, 2026
- Regency Park Oak KnollPasadena · 7.4 mi · Large community$5,950Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Fine Gold ManorNorth Hollywood · 7.7 mi · Large community$2,500Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
- Del Mar ParkPasadena · 7.7 mi · Large community$3,250Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Prospect ManorSouth Pasadena · 7.8 mi · Large community$5,500Listed on its own website · assisted living, semi-private · seen October 5, 2026
- Belmont Village HollywoodLos Angeles · 9.0 mi · Large community$4,900Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Kingsley ManorLos Angeles · 9.1 mi · Large community$3,594Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
- Silverado Senior Living - The HuntingtonAlhambra · 9.3 mi · Large community$8,100Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Glen Park at Valley VillageValley Village · 9.5 mi · Large community$5,286Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Commonwealth Royale Guest HomeLos Angeles · 9.9 mi · Large community$2,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living studio, seen September 9, 2026.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.
Rooms & the spaces they will use (8)Shared / companion rooms · Outdoor space · Wifi in resident rooms
Shared / companion rooms
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Outdoor spaceGarden
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Wifi in resident rooms
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
LaundryDone by staff
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Cable or satellite TV
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Visitor parking
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Housekeeping
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Salon or barber
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Meals, preferences & familiar food (4)Meals are cooked in the home's own kitchen · Vegetarian or vegan options · Meals served in the room
Meals are cooked in the home's own kitchen
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Vegetarian or vegan optionsVegetarian
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Meals served in the room
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Family may eat with the resident
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Activities & the rhythm of a day (4)The shape of an ordinary day, as the home describes it · Exercise or fitness program · Trips outside the home
The shape of an ordinary day, as the home describes itPet therapy
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Exercise or fitness programYoga/stretching
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Trips outside the home
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Religious services at the home
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Faith, culture & language (1)Languages spoken by caregivers
Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Pets, routines & independence (2)Residents may bring a pet · Overnight guests
Residents may bring a pet
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Overnight guests
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Visiting & staying involved (1)Transport for group outings
Transport for group outings
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Where it is
2640 Honolulu Ave, Montrose, CA 91020Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- USC Verdugo Hills HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.2 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #197609594 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 8 of 17 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 5 “Unsubstantiated”.
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 18, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not respond timely to the residents alerts Staff are not administering medications as prescribed Staff do not provide adequate food service Staff do not provide activities for the residents
On 08/18/26, at 8:15am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gina Saucedo arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced, initial complaint visit and was greeted by Denise Gotto, Executive Director. LPA explained the purpose of this visit was to gather information, conduct interviews and deliver findings regarding this complaint. On 08/18/26, LPA Saucedo asked for the census, staff, and resident rosters. On 08/18/26, at 8:50am, LPA Saucedo conducted a physical tour, interviewed staff and residents and delivered findings. LIC 9099C-continued Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation: Staff did not respond timely to the residents’ alerts. It is alleged that residents are waiting thirty (30) minutes for assistance. During LPA’s physical tour, LPA pressed four (4) random alarms in the resident’s room and the staff responded within one (1) to two (2) minute time frame. In addition, the signal alarm transmits a visual and/or auditory signal to a central staffed location at the front of the facility which is then communicated with the caregivers. LPA interviewed seven (7) residents that confirmed they receive immediate assistance if they press their pendant and/or alarm in the room. LPA interviewed three (3) staff that confirmed that their response is as quick as possible and that no resident has complained about their pendant and/or alarm not functioning. Therefore, based on the interviews conducted and the observation of the LPA the allegation(s) is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation: Staff are not administering medications as prescribed. It is alleged that residents are not receiving their medications on time. During LPA’s physical tour, LPA observed two (2) Licensed Vocational Nurses passing out medication at 8:35AM which is within the one (1) hour medication time of the 8:00AM medication to be passed out. LPA also observed bubble packs of medication being passed out that were prescribed by a pharmacist/doctor and given out within the one (1) hour time frame. LPA interviewed seven (7) residents that confirmed they receive their medication on time. One (1) out of the seven (7) residents confirmed they manage their own medication. LPA interviewed three (3) staff that confirmed medication is given within the time frame of the prescription provided. Three (3) of the staff also confirmed that medication is given within the one (1) hour time frame of the prescription order. Therefore, based on the interviews conducted and the observation of the LPA the allegation(s) is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. LIC 9099C-continued Regarding the allegation: Staff do not provide adequate food service. It is alleged that the food service is not good quality and there are no snacks like ice cream, apples or bananas to eat. During LPA’s physical tour, LPA observed residents eating eggs, toast and bacon. LPA matched what the residents were eating to what the food menu showed and took a picture of the food menu which also showed an alternative menu. LPA interviewed seven (7) residents about the quality of food and about the snacks. One (1) out of the seven (7) residents confirmed that they do not like the food but the food has gotten better since they spoke about it at the Resident Council Meeting. Another resident stated they are on a puree diet and sometimes salt is added to their food. LPA verified that the resident was on a puree diet and that the kitchen had their diet paperwork, which was in a binder, but the puree diet did not limit any salt. LPA interviewed two (2) staff that confirmed the quality of food is provided based on the state, nutritional regulations and that they also provide three (3) meals a day with snacks in between. Therefore, based on the interviews conducted and the observation of the LPA the allegation(s) is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation: Staff do not provide activities for the residents. It is alleged that there has been no field trip since January 2026 and that residents are facing the wall and no activities are being done. During LPA’s physical tour, LPA observed residents in the living room area of the facility watching the morning news which was on the activity calendar and another activity named “Thoughtful Tuesday” was also observed. LPA matched the activities being done to the activity calendar and received a copy of the activity calendar. LPA did not observe any residents facing the wall at the time the activities were being performed. LPA interviewed seven (7) residents about the activities, and all seven (7) residents confirmed activities are done every day. One (1) resident said they do not attend because they rather watch television in their room but did say they do have different activities at facility. Another resident confirmed they loved bingo which is played every day. LPA interviewed two (2) staff that confirmed the activities are done every day. One (1) staff confirmed that the residents love bingo and bingo must be on the calendar every day. Therefore, based on the interviews conducted and the observation of the LPA the allegation(s) is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. An exit interview was conducted, no citation(s) were issue, and a copy of this report was given to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 18, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260812135612
Mar 28, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan initially met with the receptionist Bertha Barbes who called the Executive Director and explained the reason for the visit. Ms. Gotto stated that the files were locked so she would be at the facility. Ms. Gotto arrived at around 11:16 AM. A tour of the physical plant was conducted at around 10:41 AM with the Marketing Director and eventually the Executive Director and the following was noted: The facility is fire cleared for one hundred twenty (120) non-ambulatory of which twenty (20) may be bedridden. The facility is currently occupying a total of seventy-five (75) residents, ten (10) of which are in hospice care. There is only one main entrance being utilized at the facility with sign-in sheets. Each residents' room has a full bathroom. LPA inspected random rooms in Memory Care and Assisted Living both first and second floor. Room 3E of Memory Care has toxins under the sink and Room 7E of Memory Care has no hot water on its sink. All rooms were observed to be adequately furnished with appropriate lighting system and enough clean linen available. Hallways are well lit. Residents have enough personal hygiene products provided by the licensee. The bathroom was checked for cleanliness and proper operation. The hot water temperature was measured at a range of 108.9°F to 118.9°F. Towels and washcloths are not shared. The facility has outdoor furniture with a covered shaded area for residents and visitors. The facility does not have a swimming pool/body of water. Laundry detergents, cleaning agents and other toxins were observed to be locked in the parking area. (continued on LIC 809-C) (continued from 809) Kitchen is sufficiently stocked with at least two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non-perishable food. Frozen foods are wrapped and stored appropriately. Food storage and preparation areas are clean and inaccessible to pests. Knives and sharps are observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. The facility has two (2) elevators, both of which are working properly. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 75°F. The facility's smoke alarms are hard-wired, interconnected with a pull system. The facility is equipped with sprinkler system but the facility has been currently on fire watch since September 2025, and per the Executive Director, they are in the process of updating their fire alarm and pull system. Fire extinguishers are located all throughout the facility and were last serviced on 02/11/26. Fire Drill was last conducted on 03/26/26. The living, dining and activity rooms are neat and clean. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 73°F but each resident has their own thermostat and can control the temperature in their rooms. The smoke alarms are hardwired, interconnected and centralized. Each room has a carbon monoxide detector installed. A signal is dispatched to the Los Angeles Fire Department automatically and the system is tested monthly. Laundry area is located in the basement area and is inaccessible to residents. Emergency drinking waters are also located in the basement/parking area. Medications were observed to be locked in the medication carts and inaccessible to residents. There were two (2) complete first aid kits in the medication room and medication carts. LPA observed medication carts locked and inaccessible to residents. Facility maintains a complete first aid kit. At 2:20 PM, LPA reviewed records of six (6) random residents and six (6) staff. Residents' records are observed to be current and updated. Staff #1 (S1) did not have a First Aid certificate on file. Citation issued. Appeal rights discussed and given. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 28, 2026
20253 state visits · 3 documents
May 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure adequate care and supervision is provided to residents in care. Staff spoke inappropriately while in front of resident.
This is an addendum to the Licensing report previously issued on 04/15/2024. Licensing program Analyst (LPA) Leizl DeLaCerra conducted announced subsequent visit to the facility on 05/01/25 to deliver the findings. LPA met the administrator and explained the purpose of the visit Allegation: Staff do not ensure adequate care and supervision is provided to residents in care. It was alleged that due to lack of supervision, resident #1 (R1) spent the night in the flooded room on 4/08/2024 and staff did not check on R1 until next morning”. To investigate this allegation. LPA Rosaura Valenzuela conducted an initial visit and delivered findings on 4/15/2024. During LPA de la Cerra's subsequent visit, 0n 4/24/2025. LPA conducted physical plant tour, conducted record reviews and staff interviews between 10:30am to 12:00pm and 1:30pm to 3:00pm, resident interviews were conducted between 12:30pm to 1:30pm. LPA obtained the staff roster, resident list, and gathered additional documents pertaining to the investigation. Continue to LIC9099C Unsubstantiated LPA de la Cerra’s interviews with staff #2 (S2) at 11:55am revealed that R1’s care and supervision was increased due to showing some signs of decline, confusion and bladder retention problems, S1 then instructed staff members to do hourly routine check for R1. Interviews with staff #3 (S3) at 3:05pm and phone interview with staff #4 (S4) on 4/30/25 who both were assigned on night shift (NOC) duty during April 2024 revealed that around the beginning of April, staff members were instructed to increase the routine check on R1 to every hour. Staff S3 and S4 did check in on R1 routinely every hour and the last check in would normally be at 6:00am when their shift would end. LPA de la Cerra’s interviews with staff members, staff #5 (S5) and staff #6 (S6) who were with the AM shift (starts at 6am) during April 2024 revealed that they checked in with R1 usually at 6:30am. and every hour thereafter. Interviews with caregivers, S3, S4, S5 and S6 revealed that although the check in with R1 was hourly but most of these check-ins with R1 would not be documented in the facility’s observation log. Caregivers are instructed that there is no need to document on the observation log if there are no changes observed with the residents or if they are just sleeping.. Interviews with residents reveal that they receive sufficient care and supervision from facility staff. Furthermore, interviews with staff # S2, S3 and S7 on 4/30/25, revealed that R1 did not like wearing incontinence underwear and the incident on 4/09/24 with the broken toilet could be due to R1 attempting to flush their incontinence underwear in the toilet which would cause the toilet to overflow and malfunction. Review of R1’s records reveal that due to R1’s change in health condition, R1’s individual service plan was modified, that facility staff will provide total assistance to R1 to ensure successful toileting. During LPA de la Cerra’s subsequent visit on 4/24/25, R1 was not available for interview, record review by LPA de la Cerra revealed the R1 no longer resides at Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living, R1’s Power of Attorney-POA moved R1 out of the facility on 3/18/2025. Based on inspection, observations, interviews and record reviews, there is insufficient information to support this allegation. Therefore, the allegation remains Unsubstantiated. CONTINUE to LIC9099-C Allegation: Staff spoke inappropriately while in front of resident. It was alleged that while the reporting party was with R1 in R1’s room, and a female staff with hair dyed pink or purple, who is Filipino said to the reporting party that R1 is “coo coo”. To investigate this allegation. LPA Rosaura Valenzuela conducted an initial visit and delivered findings on 4/15/2024. During LPA de la Cerra's subsequent visit, 0n 4/24/2025. LPA conducted physical plant tour, conducted record reviews and staff interviews between 10:30am to 12:00pm and 1:30pm to 3:00pm, resident interviews were conducted between 12:30pm to 1:30pm. LPA obtained the staff roster, resident list, and gathered additional documents pertaining to the investigation. During LPA de la Cerra’s physical plant tour, LPA did not observe any staff member with hair dyed pink or purple, who is Filipino. LPA de la Cerra’s interviews with staff #1 (S1) at 11:00am and staff #2 (S2) at 11:55am on 4/24/25 revealed that the facility did not have a Filipino staff member with hair dyed pink or purple around April 2024. Interviews with residents reveal that they have never been spoken to inappropriately by any staff members. Additionally, residents interview also revealed that no staff member ever spoke inappropriately about them in front of their family member. During LPA de la Cerra’s subsequent visit on 4/24/25, R1 was not available for interview, record review by LPA de la Cerra revealed the R1 no longer resides at Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living, R1’s Power of Attorney-POA moved R1 out of the facility on 3/18/2025. Based on inspection, observations, interviews and record reviews, there is insufficient information to support this allegation. Therefore, the allegation remains Unsubstantiated. No health and safety hazards noted at the time of this visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2025 · control 31-AS-20240410154700
Mar 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abeye Duguma met with the Executive Director, Denise Gotto, for a Required One (01) Year visit. LPA explained the reason for the visit. A tour of the physical plant was conducted at around 10:00 AM and the following was noted: The facility is fire cleared for one hundred twenty (120) non-ambulatory of which twenty (20) may be bedridden. The facility is currently occupying sixty-eight (68) residents. There is a main entrance being utilized at the facility with sign-in sheets. Each residents' room has a full bathroom. LPA inspected seven (07) rooms at random and all rooms were observed to be adequately furnished with appropriate lighting system and enough clean linen available. Hallways are well lit. Residents have enough personal hygiene product provided by the licensee. The bathroom was checked for cleanliness and proper operations. The hot water temperature was measured at an average 109.6°F. Towels and washcloths are not shared. The facility has outdoor furniture with a covered shaded area for residents and visitors. The facility does not have a swimming pool/body of water. Laundry detergents, cleaning agents and other toxins are locked away. Kitchen is sufficiently stocked with at least two (02) days perishable and seven (07) days non-perishable food. Frozen foods are wrapped and stored appropriately. Food storage and preparation areas are clean and inaccessible to pests. Knives and sharps are observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. (continued on LIC 809-C) The living and dining room are neat and clean. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 73°F but each resident has their own thermostat and can control the temperature in their rooms. The smoke and carbon monoxide detectors are hardwired, interconnected and centralized. A signal is dispatched to the Los Angeles Fire Department automatically and the system is tested monthly. Fire extinguishers are located throughout the facility, observed to be fully charged and last inspected 01/17/2025. LPA observed medication carts to be locked and inaccessible to residents. Facility maintains a complete first aid kit. No health and safety hazards noted during the visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2025
Jan 31, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff sexually abused resident in care. Staff did not report incident to the proper agencies.
An unannounced subsequent complaint visit was conducted on this day by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Panushkina to issue the findings of the above listed allegations. Upon arrival, LPA met with the Executive Director, Bill Heady, and explained the reason for the visit. On 07/28/23, the Woodland Hills South Adult and Senior Care Regional Office received a complaint regarding the allegations, “Staff sexually abused resident in care” and “Staff did not report incident to the proper agencies”. The complaint was referred to Community Care Licensing Division’s Investigations Branch. The complaint was assigned to Investigator, Laarni Santiago. On 07/31/23, LPA Ruiz initiated the complaint. LPA conducted tour of the facility and obtained copies of pertinent information which include but not limited to R1’s Physician’s Report (dated on 11/01/21). Continue on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated During todays visit, LPA Panushkina obtained copies of R1's Admission Agreement (dated on 12/22/21), Appraisal Needs and Services Plan (dated on 11/17/21) and Resident Abuse and Neglect Policy (effective date 11/01/2014) related to the complaint. This complaint investigation was conducted by Laarni Santiago, Investigator from Community Care Licensing Division’s Investigations Branch (IB). The investigation consisted of interviews, conducted between 09/07/23 to 10/26/23 with the Executive Director (ED), Health Services Director (HSD), Former Executive Director (FED), six (6) staff and attempt to interview four (4) memory care residents. Allegation: Staff sexually abused resident in care. The investigation findings revealed that R1 had been living at this facility since 12/28/2021 and resided in a Memory Care Unit. Also, during that time, S1 was working at this facility as a MedTech and it was alleged that R1 was routinely molested by S1 for a span of at least 3-6 months in 2022. Investigator conducted interviews with the Executive Director and Health Services Director and both parties could not provide any relevant information since they were not aware of any incidents between R1 and S1. Investigator also conducted an interview with S1, who denied the above allegation and advised that R1 “cried a lot” and S1 would only give a “hug” just to comfort R1. During the interview with S4, Investigator was informed that S4 and S5 witnessed S1 “kiss” R1. However, S5 refuted the claim and denied witnessing S1 commit any sexual conduct towards R1 or other residents. Moreover, S5 informed the Investigator that none of the residents or staff complained about S1. Both staff interviewed revealed inconsistent and conflicting information. Former Executive Director (FED) also informed the Investigator that no complaints from residents nor staff regarding S1’s inappropriate behavior was ever received. In addition, FED expressed that S1 was polite and reliable and voluntarily resigned to focus on school and become a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN). Furthermore, the Investigator conducted an interview with S6, who reported that he/she saw S1 inappropriately touched a resident. However, there were no other witnesses to corroborate the incident and S6 could not confirm that it was R1. Interviews with other two (2) staff did not indicate that they witnessed S1 touch or handle residents inappropriately and reported that S1 seemed to be a “genuine” and “caring” staff. Lastly, the Investigator attempted to conduct interviews with four (4) Memory Care residents, but they could not provide pertinent or relevant details. Based on interviews and information gathered during the investigation, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, it deemed Unsubstantiated, at this time. Continue on LIC9099-C Allegation: Staff did not report incident to the proper agencies. It was alleged that R1 was routinely molested by S1 for a span of at least 3-6 months in 2022 and upon discovering the situation, the Former Executive Director (FED) forced S1 to resign, but didn’t report S1 to the authorities. To investigate this allegation, on 10/12/23 the Investigator conducted an interview with the FED and was informed that this was the first time he/she heard about the sexual abuse allegation. FED also denied that any staff came forward about concerns involving S1 and R1; or that they witnessed S1 conduct any inappropriate behavior. In addition, FED informed the Investigator that R1’s responsible party was highly involved in R1’s care and visited R1 frequently. R1’s responsible party did not bring up any concerns about S1 or any staff. Moreover, FED dined that S1 was forced to resign due to a “very odd” allegation and informed the Investigator that S1 voluntarily left because S1 wanted to focus on school and become a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN). Thus, there was no reason for this information to be reported and or to be escalated to the authorities. Lastly, interview conducted on 10/24/23 with S1, confirmed that he/she resigned because the facility required staff to work longer hours, but S1 could not because of school. Therefore, based on interviews and information gathered during the investigation, this allegation is Unsubstantiated. No deficiency cited during today's visit. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 31, 2025 · control 31-AS-20230728111241
20243 state visits · 3 documents
May 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not following proper reporting requirement Resident care needs are not being met by facility staff
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Business Office Manager Helen Kirkorian and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:42 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:18 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that resident care needs are not being met by facility staff, it was alleged that Residents are complaining about quality of care and multiple issues with resident care needs. LPA's interview with six (6) residents on 03/13/24 between 12:30 PM to 2:00 PM and another six (6) residents today between 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM revealed that twelve (12) out of twelve (12) residents or about 20% of current census stated that the staff are respectful and provide all the care that they need and the quality of care are to their satisfaction. None of the twelve (12) residents interviewed expressed any issue with care or staff at this time. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) Regarding the allegation that Staff are not following proper reporting requirement, it was alleged that two (2) residents were in altercation and the former Executive Director (ED) did not take the staff concern seriously and did not report to CCL. The reporting party (RP) did not provide any details of the alleged incident as to who, when and where it happened. The RP also did not provide any contact details, so no contact was made with the RP to get the details of the alleged incident that was not reported. LPA's record review today between at 1:00 PM to 1:38 PM revealed that the ED referred to on RP's report had left the facility sometime in June 2023. LPA's interview with a staff at 12:45 PM however, revealed that the only altercation happened during the time of the former ED between two (2) residents happened sometime in May of 2023. LPA's record review today between 1:00 PM to 1:38 PM revealed that the facility had submitted Unusual Incident/Injury Report (LIC 624) on 05/22/23 regarding an altercation between two (2) residents happened on 05/21/23. The incident was also reported to the local law enforcement. Based on the information gathered during this and prior visit, the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230308135842
Mar 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is unsafe for residents in care due to unsecured access ways Residents are not provided proper medication assistance
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Gary Tan and Ray Comer conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPAs met with interim Administrator Tracy Waite as the current administrator is indisposed and explained the reason for the visit. LPAs conducted physical plant tour at around 9:40 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:10 AM, reviewed records between 10:30 AM to 11:40 AM and interviewed residents and staff between 12:30 PM to 2:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that Facility is unsafe for residents in care due to unsecured access ways, it was alleged that there is an issue regarding residents' safety and elopement from unsecured access ways in Memory Care Unit. LPAs observation during today's visit revealed that the access ways in the Memory Care units are secured and all the delayed egress and all safety protocol are in place. LPAs' interview with the maintenance staff at 12:30 PM also revealed that there was never an issue with the access and ingress and egress on the Memory Care Unit and never in disrepair for the last one and half year since the maintenance staff was employed. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099-C) Regarding the allegation that residents are not provided proper medication assistance, it was alleged that there were Medication errors and late Medications pass at the facility. LPAs interviewed six (6) random residents or 10% of current census today between 12:30 PM to 2:00 PM revealed that six (6) out of six (6) residents did not experience medication error nor late medication administration. Further interviews also revealed that six (6) out of six (6) residents did not witness or aware of any resident who had medication error or late medication pass. LPAs interview with two (2) Medication staff today between 12:30 PM to 2:00 PM also revealed that there was no medication error or medication late pass and/or reported for the last two (2) years that the medication staff were employed. Based on the information gathered during this visit the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 13, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230308135842
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Feb 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosaura Valenzuela conducted an unannounced Required 1 year inspection to the facility. LPA met with Helen Kirkorian, Business Office Manager and the purpose of the visit was discussed. LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the facility. There is one main entrance being utilized at the facility. The facility consists of one main building. The Independent Living section of the facility is on the top floor and the Memory Care Unit is located on the bottom floor. The facility has a capacity for 131 residents. Currently 58 rooms are being occupied. Common areas were checked for cleanliness. Food Service/Kitchen area was sufficiently stocked with two (2) days of perishable and seven (7) days of non-perishable food. The residents rooms are adequately furnished with appropriate furniture and lighting system. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 78 degrees. The smoke detectors are hardwired and interconnected and observed to be operational. There are carbon monoxide detectors in the facility. Fire extinguishers are located throughout the facility and were last serviced in January of 2024. The bathrooms were checked for cleanliness and proper operation. LPA observed the appropriate grab bars in the showers and toilets. The hot water temperature was measured at 120 degrees F. Medications-LPA observed medication carts in the nursing station to be locked and inaccessible to residents. There is one ( 01) complete first aid kit. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was issued and signature obtained. No deficiencies were issued at this timethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2024
Earlier years2022 · 9 documents
20227 state visits · 9 documents
Oct 9, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Residents hygiene needs are not being met Staff did not seek medical attention for resident in care Staff have not given resident medication
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Resident Care Coordinator Veronica Sanchez and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:34 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:02 AM, reviewed records between 10:15 to 12:00 PM and interviewed staff and 12:10 PM to 2:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that residents hygiene needs are not being met, it was alleged that the Resident #1 (R1)'s hair was dirty and R1's teeth were dirty like they had not been washed and brushed for a while. LPA's record review revealed that R1's was showered and body inspected as scheduled unless R1 refused. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) LPA's interview with three (3) memory care staff today between 12:10 PM to 2:00 PM also revealed that R1 was being attend to like other residents in memory care unit and clean and groomed every morning before breakfast, including but not limited to dressing, brushing teeth, showering and change of diapers. LPA's observation during physical plant tour today at 9:34 AM at the memory care unit also revealed that the residents were neatly dressed and well groomed. Regarding the allegation that staff did not seek medical attention for resident in care, it was alleged that R1 was found to have a toe fungal infection and did not see the facility Podiatrist. LPA's record review today at around 10:15 AM revealed that there was a communication between the facility and the facility Podiatrist on 02/25/21 requesting the latter to see R1. R1 was issued new medication order on 03/11/21 for R1's toenail but was only seen by the Podiatrist on 05/13/21 at the facility due to the doctor's availability. There were also communication with other doctor regarding R1's foot condition on 03/31/21 and 04/06/21. Regarding the allegation that staff have not given resident medication, it was alleged that R1 was not given toenail medication on 05/10/21 as ordered by the physician. LPA record review today at around 11:25 AM revealed that the toenail medication was prescribed to be applied at bedtime and R1's medication administration record (MAR) review revealed that the medication was applied every night as prescribed. Based on the information gathered during this and prior visits, the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2022 · control 31-AS-20210519142527
Sep 15, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident sustained a bruise while in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosaura Valenzuela made a unannounced subsequent visit for the above noted allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Ernest Lewis and explained the reason for the visit. It was alleged that on 02/17/2022 Resident #1 (R1) had been injured and sustained a bruise while in care. To investigate this allegation on 03/15/22 at 1:00pm and on 09/11/2022 at 11:00am, LPA inspected the facility and R1’s room. At the time of this visit between 11:15am and 12:00pm, LPA interviewed two current staff. Furthermore, LPA Valenzuela made an attempt to speak with facility staff #1 (S1) and staff #2 (S2) who were assisting R1 in the month of February 2022 and was informed that both staff no longer work at the facility. Staff interviews revealed that Resident # 1 (R1) was observed to be scratching their face all the time. R1’s nails were noted to be long and were recently trimmed by the hospice agency. Staff believe that on 02/17/2022 R1 sustained injuries, due to scratching their own face. At 12:07pm, LPA looked at two pictures that were taken of R1 after the incident. The photos appear to confirm what staff told LPA. R1’s injury See 9099-C Unsubstantiated appeared to be a couple of scratches and not a bruise. In addition, on 09/11/2022 around 1:30pm and at the time of this visit at 1:45pm LP Valenzuela reviewed the facility internal incident log. The information revealed from the incident log is consistent with the information received from the staff. Based on inspection, observation, interviews and record review, there is not sufficient information to support this allegation. Therefore, it is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. No health and safety issues noted. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 15, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220314112215
Sep 15, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not follow Dr. orders Medications were accessible to resident in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Ernest Lewis and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:35 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation and reviewed records between 10:00 AM to 12:00 PM. LPA also interviewed staff between 12:15 AM to 1:30 PM. Regarding the allegation that the staff did not follow orders, it was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) resident supposed to have one (1) patch to put on his back daily but was found to have two (2) patches on R1's chest on 05/03/21. LPA's record review today between 10:00 AM to 12:00 PM, revealed that R1 was prescribed one (1) patch for every twenty four (24) hours. Photo evidence provided by the witness revealed that R1 had two (2) patches on R1's chest. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Substantiated (continued from LIC 9099) Further record review also revealed that communication between the facility and R1's physician confirmed that R1 had two (2) patches on chest on 04/28/21 and staff failed to remove the old patch before applying a new one. Regarding the allegation that Medications were accessible to resident in care, it was alleged that prescription medication was left in R1's room and accessible to R1. LPA's record review today between 10:00 AM to 12:00 PM revealed that the photo evidence provided by the witness had clearly shown that the prescription medication was in R1's room and accessible to the resident. Based on the information gathered during this and prior visits, the allegations are deemed substantiated at this time. Citation issued. Appeal rights discussed and given. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 15, 2022 · control 31-AS-20210519142527
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(c)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 16, 2022
Once ordered by the physician the medication is given according to the physician's directions. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA record review the licensee did not abide by R1's physician's order. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 15, 2022
Plan of correction: Executive Director agreed to re train all the medication technician and will provide proof of training to CCL on or before the POC date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 16, 2022
Centrally stored medicines shall be kept in a safe and locked place that is not accessible to persons other than employees responsible for the supervision of the centrally stored medication. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA record review, licensee failed to keep the prescription medication in central medication storage and accessible to R1. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 15, 2022
Plan of correction: Executive Director agreed to do a daily sweep to all memory care residents and train all staff regarding prohibited items on dementia residents and will submit proof of training and daily log to CCL on or before the POC date.
The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Sep 11, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek medical attention for resident Staff did not notify responsible party of resident's injury.
Licensing Program Analyst Rosaura Valenzuela conducted an unannounced subsequent visit for the above noted allegations. LPA met with Veronica Sanchez, Resident Care Coordinator The purpose of the visit was discussed. It was reported that staff did not seek medical attention for resident #1 (R1) when they sustained an injury. On 3/15/2022 at 3:02pm, staff interviews were initiated. Interviews revealed that staff did seek medical attention for R1. Facility informed R1's primary care physician and hospice agency. On 9/11/2022 between 12:30pm and 1:30pm, LPA Valenzuela reviewed R1's records. Records reviewed confirmed what staff had told LPA, On 2/18/2022 the hospice agency staff came to the facility to assess R1. Hospice staff noted that R1 was not in distress or pain at the time. According to hospice staff the injury looked better. Based on interview and record review there is insufficient information to support this allegation, therefore it is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Unsubstantiated It was alleged that staff did not notify responsible party of resident's injury. To investigate this allegation, on 3/15/2022. LPA initiated staff interviews. Interviews revealed that the facility did notify R1's responsible party on the injury, within 24 hours of its occurrence. On 9/11/2022 between 12:30pm and 1:30pm R1's records were reviewed. Records reviewed confirmed what staff had told LPA, On 2/17/2022 at 3:40pm, staff spoke to R1's responsible party regarding the injury. Staff explained to responsible party the extent of the injury. Based on interview and record review there is not sufficient information to support this allegation. Therefore, it has been deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No health and safety issues noted. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 11, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220314112215
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Sep 11, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident's clothes are dirty Residents clothes are missing
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with staff Veronica Sanchez and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:35 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation and reviewed records between 10:00 AM to 11:30 AM. LPA also interviewed staff and residents between 11:30 AM to 1:30 PM. Regarding the allegation that Resident's clothes are missing, it was alleged that Resident #1 (R1)'s underwear and clothes are missing, LPA's record review at 10:00 AM, revealed that R1's Power of Attorney (POA) did not declare any personal belongings on the inventory section of R1's Admission Agreement. LPA's observation during physical plant tour at 9:35 AM also revealed that R1 has a walk in closet full of clothes. (continued to LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) LPA's interview with two (2) staff revealed that all Memory Care residents' family are advised to label their family members' clothes so as to avoid unintentional mixing with other residents'. Staff also did not receive any complaint or information about R1's missing clothes or items. Regarding the allegation that Resident's clothes are dirty, it was alleged that R1's clothes are dirty. LPA's observation during today's visit at 9:35 AM, revealed that R1's clothes are clean and tidy. LPA's interview with two (2) staff revealed that all of residents' clothes are being laundered once a week per schedule. Based on the information gathered during this and prior visit, the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 11, 2022 · control 31-AS-20210519142527
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Aug 20, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not cleaning resident(s) rooms Insufficient staffing to meet the needs of the resident(s) Resident(s) call lights not answered timely
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with staff Lizette Halili and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant at 9:35 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:20 AM and interviewed residents and staff between 10:50 AM to 2:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that staff are not cleaning resident(s) rooms, it was alleged that no one is cleaning residents' room as they were dirty and unkempt. LPA's interview with nine (9) residents or more than 14% of current census, today between 10:50 AM to 2:00 PM revealed that nine (9) out of nine (9) residents stated that staff clean their room everyday and do general cleaning once a week. LPA's observation on 08/17/22 at 10:35 AM also revealed that twelve (12) out of twelve (12) room visited were clean and in proper order. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) Regarding the allegation that there is insufficient staffing to meet the needs of the resident(s), it was alleged that the facility lacked enough staff that residents' need are not being met. LPA's interview with nine (9) residents or more than 14% of current census, today, between 10:50 AM to 2:00 PM revealed that nine (9) out of nine (9) residents believe that the facility has sufficient staffing and all their needs are being met. LPA's interview with four (4) care staff today between 10:50 AM to 2:00 PM, also revealed that four (4) out of four (4) staff believe that they have sufficient staffing and they provide the care that the residents' deserve and need. Regarding the allegation that residents' call lights not answered timely, it was alleged that many residents that pulled their cords have to wait a long time to get staff to assist them. LPA's interview with nine (9) residents or more than 14% of current census, today, between 10:50 AM to 2:00 PM revealed that seven (7) out of nine (9) residents believe that the facility staff almost always come within reasonable time whenever they pull their cord and the other two (2) residents had not pulled their cord during their stay at the facility. Based on the information gathered during this and prior visits, there is insufficient information to support the allegations and therefore deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 20, 2022 · control 31-AS-20201124081727
Aug 17, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Insufficient clean linens to meet the resident(s) needs Resident(s) room is malodorous
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Gary Tan and Rosaura Valenzuela conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPAs met with Executive Director Ernest Lewis and explained the reason for the visit. LPAs conducted physical plant tour at 10:20 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 11:00 AM and interviewed Executive Director and staff between 11:15 AM to 1:30 PM. Regarding the allegation the there is insufficient linens to meet resident(s) needs, it was alleged that residents are sleeping on dirty sheets and there are not enough sheets for residents in care. LPAs observation today at around 10:35 AM revealed that there are sufficient linens in stock at the facility's multiple linen storage. LPAs also visited twelve (12) residents' room during physical plant tour and observed that twelve (12) out of twelve (12) rooms visited, linens were clean and in good condition. LPAs interview with Maintenance director also revealed that linens are regularly changed for each resident once a week and as needed or upon request. Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) Regarding the allegation that the resident(s) room is malodorous, it was alleged that multiple rooms in the facility were dirty and had stained on their carpets. LPA observation today during physical plant tour at 10:35 AM revealed that twelve (12) out of twelve (12) rooms visited, there was no foul odor observed in any of the rooms. LPA observed that all the rooms visited were clean and in order. LPA did not see any room with stain on the carpet. LPA interview with Executive Director at around 12:05 PM, also revealed that they are continuously renovating/upgrading the rooms for the incoming and existing residents. Based on the information gathered during this visit, there is no sufficient information to support the allegations and therefore deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 17, 2022 · control 31-AS-20201124081727
The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Jul 7, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff is not providing resident’s medication as prescribed. Resident was left in the soiled diaper for extended period of time. Resident not being provided medical attention in a timely manner.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosaura Valenzuela conducted an unannounced visit to investigate the above noted allegations. LPA met with Ernest Lewis, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. It was reported that staff is not providing resident's medication as prescribed. To investigate this allegation on 7/07/2022 at 1:00pm, LPA Valenzuela initiated staff interviews. Interviews revealed that Resident #1 (R1) is being given their medication. At 2:15pm, LPA Valenzuela reviewed R1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the months of June and July of 2022. LPA did not observe any discrepancies. The M.A.R. for the month of June indicated that R1 did not receive medication from 6/12-6/20/22 due to the fact that they were not in the community. Also, one cream was not administered on 6/24 and 6/25 of 2022 because the facility had not received the medication. Besides the dates mentioned previously, according to the M.A.R. and staff interviews, R1 has been receiving their medication on a daily basis. Continue on 9099-C Unsubstantiated Based on interviews, record review, and observation, this allegation has been deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. It was alleged that Resident #1 was left in a soiled diaper for an extended period of time. To investigate this allegation on 7/07/2022 between 1:00pm and 2:00pm, LPA initiated staff interviews. Interviews revealed that R1 was not left in a soiled diaper for an extended period of time. Staff change residents' diaper three times per shift, as needed, or as requested by the residents. In addition, staff indicated that if they detect a foul odor coming from a resident that requires incontinent care, then they will change their diaper immediately. Based on interviews, there is not sufficient information to support this allegation. Therefore, this allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. It was reported that Resident #1 is not being provided medical attention in a timely manner. To investigate this allegation on 7/07/2022 between 1:00pm and 2:00pm, staff interviews were conducted. Interviews revealed that R1 is currently receiving Palliative Care. Staff from Palliative Care come weekly to the facility to access R1. Staff from Palliative Care did inform the facility that the ointments prescribed by the M.D. were causing more harm than good. The ointments were keeping R1's skin moist and the friction caused by R1's movements was not helping R1's skin to heal. Palliative Care staff recommended that a powder medication be given to R1 instead of a cream to help keep the skin dry, so it could heal faster. Based on interviews and record review, there is not sufficient information to support this allegation. Therefore, this allegation is deemed to be UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220701095734
Feb 17, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosaura Valenzuela conducted an unannounced Required 1 year infection control inspection to the facility. LPA met with Executive Director Ernest Lewis. The purpose of the visit was discussed. At 10:45am, with the assistance of the ED, LPA conducted a tour of the facility. There is one main entrance being utilized at the facility, there are required posters posted at the main door. Screening area is located immediately upon entrance. Temperature was checked, and a sign in sheet with Covid questions was available. LPA was screened upon entry. The facility had submitted and approved Mitigation Plan. Signs to wear a mask and other COVID-19 prevention protocol signs were posted outside the door. Hand washing, coughing etiquette, physical distancing and other necessary signs were posted in the bathroom and all over the facility. The facility has a designated visitors' area in the front of the building. The facility has sufficient stock of PPE in the storage room. See 809-C to continue The facility consists of one main building. The Independent Living section of the facility is on the top floor and the Memory Care Unit is located on the bottom floor. The facility has a capacity for 131 residents. Currently 55 rooms are being occupied. Common areas were checked for cleanliness. Food Service/Kitchen area was sufficiently stocked with two (2) days of perishable and seven (7) days of non-perishable food. The residents rooms are adequately furnished with appropriate furniture and lighting system. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 78 degrees. The smoke detectors are hardwired and interconnected and observed to be operational. There are carbon monoxide detectors in the facility. Fire extinguishers are located throughout the facility and were last serviced in February of 2021. The bathrooms were checked for cleanliness and proper operation. LPA observed the appropriate grab bars in the showers and toilets. The hot water temperature was measured at 120 degrees F. Medications-LPA observed medication carts in the nursing station to be locked and inaccessible to residents. There is one ( 01) complete first aid kit. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was issued and signature obtained. No deficiencies were issued at this timethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 17, 2022
76 of 131 beds were occupied at the August 18, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Ec Opco Ca Partner IV LLC; Sh1 Shoreline Mgmt, LLC, licensed since 2019.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2019, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 17
- Total complaints
- 8
- Substantiated allegations
- 2
- Type A citations
- 2
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2019, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 2 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 1 |
| Substantiated allegations | 2 | 2 |
| Total complaints | 8 | 6 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living
Is Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living licensed for?
131 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living been cited?
2 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 17 state visits over the same years.
Is Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living cost?
$4,300 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living studio, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 132 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,288 to $5,973 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 132 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Ec Opco Ca Partner IV LLC; Sh1 Shoreline Mgmt, LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
USC Verdugo Hills Hospital is 1.2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 10 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “SPARR HEIGHTS ESTATES SENIOR LIVING”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #197609594. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 131 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Ec Opco Ca Partner IV LLC; Sh1 Shoreline Mgmt, LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 17 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 2 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 17 state visits in that period.
- 8 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is August 18, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$6,500 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$6,500 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$6,100 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $5,000–$7,550On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$6,150 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $5,050–$7,550On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$6,050 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,950–$7,450On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,250–$6,400On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Los Angeles County