Strawberry Cottage is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Lancaster, Los Angeles County, California — state license #197609011, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 14 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated October 8, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

9 homes in view

Strawberry Cottage

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Lancaster, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedMemory careHospiceBedriddenWheelchair not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #197609011, held since 2016 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
43732 Sentry Lane · Lancaster, Los Angeles County
Phone
(661) 266-7995
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file — ask the home
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 2 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 1 resident

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 1 AMB. 5 NON-AMB OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. NON-AMB IN ROOMS #1 & #4. BEDRIDDEN IN BDRM # 3. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 21 times and filed 14 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated October 8, 2025.

Most recent state visit
October 8, 2025
Occupancy at the September 9, 2025 visit
3 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 10 documents with transcribed findings, dated April 14, 2023 to September 9, 2025. 10 of the 10 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unsubstantiated” (5). 10 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 10 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 7 of 14 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20253 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide resident with a 60 day rent increase notice

On 09/09/2025 Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Evelin Rios conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit for the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with Monica Gory, the administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. An entrance interview was conducted with the administrator. Present in the home was staff #1 (S1) and two (02) out of three (03) residents. A third resident arrived at approximately 2:15PM. Allegation: Staff did not provide resident with a 60 day rent increase notice. It was alleged that Resident #1’s (R1’s) responsible party received a notification of rate increase on 02/06/2025 with effective date 01/01/2025. To investigate the allegation LPA Rios conducted an initial visit on 02/25/2025. During initial visit LPA conducted an interview with the administrator and staff present. From approximately 10:54 a.m. to 1:26 p.m., LPA reviewed resident records and obtained documents such as but not limited to R1’s admission agreement, Assisted Living Waiver documentatthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 9, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250221124252
Feb 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not provide nutritious meals. Staff does not provide an adequate amount of food. Resident’s toilet is in disrepair.

On 09/10/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Evelin Rios arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver the determination on the above allegations. LPA was greeted by Staff #4 (S4) who granted access. S4 contacted the administrator, Monica Gory to let them know LPA was at the facility. Administrator met LPA shortly after. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. At 1:40 p.m. LPA conducted a physical plant tour to ensure the health and safety of the residents in care. On 01/12/2024 LPA Rios conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit for the above allegations. During the initial visit LPA conducted a physical plant tour, interviews with staff #1 (S1), the administrator designee at the time Ricky De Sahagun and staff #2 (S2). LPA also conducted interviews with three (3) out of six (6) residents at the facility able to respond to LPA’s questions. LPA reviewed and obtained copies of the staff calendar, meal calendar and staff’s daily notes. (Continued onthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240103165416
Sep 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mishandling residents medication. Staff not maintaining a comfortable room temperature for resident. Staff does not provide resident grab bars for safe showering. Call button not accessible to resident.

On 02/12/2024 Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Evelin Rios arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver the determination on the above allegations. LPA was greeted by Staff #1 (S1) who granted access. S1 contacted the administrator David Taylor and administrator designee Monica Gory to let them know LPA was at the facility. Administrator and administrator designee met LPA shortly after. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. At 1:00 p.m. LPA conducted a physical plant tour to ensure the health and safety of the residents in care. Allegation #1: Staff mishandling resident medication. It was alleged staff have given resident #1 (R1) an incorrect dosage of medication on different occasions. To investigate the allegation LPA Rios conducted an initial visit on 01/12/2024, during this visit LPA interviewed residents and staff from approximately 11:50 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. LPA also reviewed six (6) of six (6) Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records (Cthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240103165416
20231 state visit · 1 document
Sep 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not assist resident in a timely manner. Staff did not provide a safe and comfortable environment for resident.

On 09/14/2023 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Evelin Rios conducted an unannounced complaint visit for the above allegations. LPA arrived at the facility at 10:00 a.m. and was greeted by Staff #1 (S1) who granted access. S1 called the Administrator Designee Hailam P. Taylor. Administrator David Taylor was unavailable. Hailam met LPA shortly after. Hailam contacted Administrator David Taylor via telephone and LPA explained to Administrator Designee Hailam and the Administrator David Taylor the purpose of the visit. Hailam will sign todays report. An entrance interview was conducted. At 10:15 a.m. LPA conducted a physical plant tour to ensure the health and safety of the residents in care. From 10:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. LPA conducted interviews with Administrator and Staff #2 (S2) over the phone. LPA conducted interviews with Administrator designee, S1 and three (3) out of six (6) residents at the facility. From 12:00 p.m. to 2:44 p.m. LPA reviewed resident records and obtained documentsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 13, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230908152350
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 0
Type B citations7typical 0
Substantiated complaints11typical 0
Total complaints6typical 0
State visits on file21typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2016.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2025331202423020236842022110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$4,000$6,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (661) 266-7995

Is Strawberry Cottage licensed?

Yes — Strawberry Cottage is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Lancaster (Los Angeles County): California license #197609011, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 14 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated October 8, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Strawberry Cottage care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Strawberry Cottage with clearances for dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list wheelchair / non-ambulatory. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 1 AMB. 5 NON-AMB OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. NON-AMB IN ROOMS #1 & #4. BEDRIDDEN IN BDRM # 3. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2.

How much does Strawberry Cottage cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Strawberry Cottage's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Strawberry Cottage accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Strawberry Cottage is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

3 of 6 beds occupied (50%) when the state visited on September 9, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Strawberry Cottage?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 21 state visits and 14 dated documents since 2022 for Strawberry Cottage; 10 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated September 9, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

10 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide resident with a 60 day rent increase notice
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 09/09/2025 Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Evelin Rios conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit for the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with Monica Gory, the administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. An entrance interview was conducted with the administrator. Present in the home was staff #1 (S1) and two (02) out of three (03) residents. A third resident arrived at approximately 2:15PM. Allegation: Staff did not provide resident with a 60 day rent increase notice. It was alleged that Resident #1’s (R1’s) responsible party received a notification of rate increase on 02/06/2025 with effective date 01/01/2025. To investigate the allegation LPA Rios conducted an initial visit on 02/25/2025. During initial visit LPA conducted an interview with the administrator and staff present. From approximately 10:54 a.m. to 1:26 p.m., LPA reviewed resident records and obtained documents such as but not limited to R1’s admission agreement, Assisted Living Waiver documentatCDSS inspection report, September 9, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250221124252

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not provide nutritious meals. Staff does not provide an adequate amount of food. Resident’s toilet is in disrepair.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 09/10/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Evelin Rios arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver the determination on the above allegations. LPA was greeted by Staff #4 (S4) who granted access. S4 contacted the administrator, Monica Gory to let them know LPA was at the facility. Administrator met LPA shortly after. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. At 1:40 p.m. LPA conducted a physical plant tour to ensure the health and safety of the residents in care. On 01/12/2024 LPA Rios conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit for the above allegations. During the initial visit LPA conducted a physical plant tour, interviews with staff #1 (S1), the administrator designee at the time Ricky De Sahagun and staff #2 (S2). LPA also conducted interviews with three (3) out of six (6) residents at the facility able to respond to LPA’s questions. LPA reviewed and obtained copies of the staff calendar, meal calendar and staff’s daily notes. (Continued onCDSS inspection report, September 10, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240103165416
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff mishandling residents medication. Staff not maintaining a comfortable room temperature for resident. Staff does not provide resident grab bars for safe showering. Call button not accessible to resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 02/12/2024 Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Evelin Rios arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver the determination on the above allegations. LPA was greeted by Staff #1 (S1) who granted access. S1 contacted the administrator David Taylor and administrator designee Monica Gory to let them know LPA was at the facility. Administrator and administrator designee met LPA shortly after. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. At 1:00 p.m. LPA conducted a physical plant tour to ensure the health and safety of the residents in care. Allegation #1: Staff mishandling resident medication. It was alleged staff have given resident #1 (R1) an incorrect dosage of medication on different occasions. To investigate the allegation LPA Rios conducted an initial visit on 01/12/2024, during this visit LPA interviewed residents and staff from approximately 11:50 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. LPA also reviewed six (6) of six (6) Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records (CCDSS inspection report, February 12, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240103165416

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not assist resident in a timely manner. Staff did not provide a safe and comfortable environment for resident.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 09/14/2023 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Evelin Rios conducted an unannounced complaint visit for the above allegations. LPA arrived at the facility at 10:00 a.m. and was greeted by Staff #1 (S1) who granted access. S1 called the Administrator Designee Hailam P. Taylor. Administrator David Taylor was unavailable. Hailam met LPA shortly after. Hailam contacted Administrator David Taylor via telephone and LPA explained to Administrator Designee Hailam and the Administrator David Taylor the purpose of the visit. Hailam will sign todays report. An entrance interview was conducted. At 10:15 a.m. LPA conducted a physical plant tour to ensure the health and safety of the residents in care. From 10:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. LPA conducted interviews with Administrator and Staff #2 (S2) over the phone. LPA conducted interviews with Administrator designee, S1 and three (3) out of six (6) residents at the facility. From 12:00 p.m. to 2:44 p.m. LPA reviewed resident records and obtained documentsCDSS inspection report, September 13, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230908152350
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure safety measures for resident(s) in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 06/14/2023 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Evelin Rios and Melissa Ruiz conducted an announced subsequent complaint visit for the above allegation. LPAs arrived at the facility at 10:00 a.m. and were greeted by staff#1 (S1) who granted access. S1 called the Administrator David James Taylor. Administrator met LPAs shortly after and informed David about the purpose of the visit. Staff do not ensure safety measures for resident(s) in care. It is alleged a staff #2 (S2) dog chased resident#1 (R1) to their room. To investigate this allegation LPA Rios conducted initial interviews with residents and staff on 05/02/2023 from 2:00 p.m. to 2:50 p.m. and from 5:45 p.m. to 6:32 p.m. LPA reviewed resident records and obtained documents relevant to this investigation. On 05/03/2023 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rios conducted a follow-up interview with resident#1 at 10:21 a.m. (LIC9099-C continued on to next page) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 14, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230427111039
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not arrange, or assist in arranging, for necessary medical care for resident(s). Facility did not arrange, or assist in arranging, for transportation of resident(s) to and/or from hospital.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 06/14/2023 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Evelin Rios and Melissa Ruiz conducted an unannounced complaint visit for the above allegations. LPAs arrived at the facility at 10:00 a.m. and were greeted by staff#1 (S1) who granted access. S1 called the Administrator David James Taylor and met with LPA shortly after. LPAs informed him about the purpose of the visit. Allegation #1:Facility did not arrange, or assist in arranging, for necessary medical care for resident(s). It is alleged resident#1 (R1) has requested assistance with receiving a consistent replenishment of portable oxygen which facility has failed to obtain and furthermore has failed to make arrangements for R1 to see a physician per R1s request. To investigate this allegation LPA interviewed residents and administrator from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Interview with R1 revealed that about three months ago they had requested to see a physician for a health concern and according to R1, the administrator did not assist them wCDSS inspection report, June 14, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230608131051
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff failed to administer resident's medication as prescribed.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At 10:00 a.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Ruiz arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced subsequent complaint visit. LPA was greeted by staff and later met with Licensee, David Taylor. The purpose of the visit was explained, and an entrance interview was conducted. Allegation: Staff failed to administer resident's medication as prescribed. On 5/5/2022, LPAs Ruiz and Martinez conducted an initial visit. During this visit, LPAs conducted a random medication count for R1 from 11:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. and two medications Baclofen and Quetiapine Fumarate (Seroquel) were observed to be inconsistent with the medication instructions. The medication Baclofen was to be administered 3 times a day, and there were three separate bubble packs for morning, noon, and night. LPAs observed 2 pills in the a.m. packs for 5/5/22, and 5/3/22 and the Medication Administration and Record log (MAR) was signed by a staff member indicating that the medication was given on said dates. In additCDSS inspection report, June 13, 2023 · control 31-AS-20220429094057
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee does not dispense medication as prescribed to resident(s) in care. Licensee does not assist in arranging, for medical and dental care appropriate to the conditions and needs of residents. Staff do not safeguard resident's personal property. Resident's mattress is in disrepair.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 05/03/2023 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Evelin Rios conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit for the above allegations. LPA arrived at the facility at 10:00 a.m. and was greeted by staff #1 (S1) who granted access. Ricky Desahagun called the facility as LPA was checking in and LPA informed Ricky about the purpose of the visit. Ricky met LPA shortly after. At 10:21 a.m. LPA conducted a follow-up interview with one out of six residents. At 10:36 a.m. LPA reviewed and obtained further documents relevant to this investigation. Allegation #1: Licensee does not dispense medication as prescribed to resident(s) in care. It is alleged Licensee has withheld prescribed medication from R1. To investigate this allegation on 05/02/2023 LPA observed Ricky count medication and LPA compared the count with Centrality Stored Medication Logs and Medication Administration Records (MAR). (Continued on LIC9099-C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 3, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230427111039
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff fail to provide aid with daily living Staff failed to address resident's change in medical condition
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shira Stamps conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit for the above allegations. Entrance interview conducted with the Administrator. On 9/6/22, LPA collected documents and on 9/16/22 LPA conducted interviews and collection additional documents. Allegation: Staff fail to provide aid with daily living It is alleged that resident one (R1) is being neglected and not receiving proper care. It is alleged that R1’s issues with the toes are getting worse and staff do not clean R1’s toes or R1’s seat, and R1 believes that wound care is needed, and that R1 wants to be transferred to a new facility. Based on document review the facility provides basic services to all residents in care, and R1 had an assisted living waiver program service plan. R1 was also receiving hospice services. CONTINUED... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 14, 2023 · control 31-AS-20200618160904
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident is being illegally evicted Facility did not release resident's personal belongings
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shira Stamps conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit for the above allegations. Entrance interview conducted with the Administrator. On 9/6/22, LPA collected documents and on 9/16/22 LPA conducted interviews and collection additional documents. Allegation: Resident is being illegally evicted It is alleged that the resident (R1) was rushed to the hospital, and the facility would not accept R1 back into the facility. Based on record review, it was found that R1 was discharged and notified on 6/12/20 that Hospice Care services could no longer meet the needs of R1, and it was recommended by Hospice that R1 go to a different type of facility such as a pain clinic due to R1’s increased demand for pain medications. It was noted that Hospice explained the plan to R1 and R1 verbalized understanding. On 6/16/20, an incident report was sent to Community Care Licensing (CCL) stating that R1 wanted to go to the hospital because of foot pain that was beingCDSS inspection report, April 14, 2023 · control 31-AS-20200624133943

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 21 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
7
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
11
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
6
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
21
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Strawberry Cottage?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Rees-taylor Llc, who operates 2 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(661) 266-7995
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Strawberry Cottage? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.