Glen Terra Assisted Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Glendale, Los Angeles County, California — state license #197609005, licensed for 155 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 46 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated April 14, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

1 home in view

Glen Terra Assisted Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 155 residents · Glendale, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #197609005, held since 2017 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
917 N Louise Street · Glendale, Los Angeles County
Phone
(818) 291-1918
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 155 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 4 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 155 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 4 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 50 times and filed 46 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated April 14, 2026.

Most recent state visit
April 14, 2026
Occupancy at the July 27, 2023 visit
97 of 155 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 25 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 21, 2021 to July 27, 2023. 25 of the 25 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (6), “Unsubstantiated” (19). 25 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 25 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 16 of 46 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 6 documents
Apr 14, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 18, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 18, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 4 documents
Sep 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20244 state visits · 4 documents
Aug 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20232 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 27, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 31, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations7typical 1
Substantiated complaints6typical 2
Total complaints32typical 7
State visits on file50typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2017.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20263602025340202444020238103202210133202110110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (818) 291-1918

Is Glen Terra Assisted Living licensed?

Yes — Glen Terra Assisted Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Glendale (Los Angeles County): California license #197609005, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 155 residents. State records list 46 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated April 14, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Glen Terra Assisted Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Glen Terra Assisted Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 155 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 4 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.

How much does Glen Terra Assisted Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Glen Terra Assisted Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Glen Terra Assisted Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Glen Terra Assisted Living is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

97 of 155 beds occupied (63%) when the state visited on July 27, 2023. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Glen Terra Assisted Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 50 state visits and 46 dated documents since 2021 for Glen Terra Assisted Living; 25 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated July 27, 2023, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

25 transcribed reports on file

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was not adequately supervised
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Villalobos conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit for the allegation above. LPA met with administrator Carlos Lara and the purpose of the visit was discussed. Initial visit was conducted on 2/24/22 by LPA Kruz and consisted of the following: LPA obtained and reviewed a copy of the Staff Schedule (August, September, October and December 2021), Resident Roster, Resident #1's records (Physician report, Medical History, Resident Appraisal, Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan, Identification and Emergency Information). On todays visit, LPA Villalobos toured the physical plant and interviewed Staff #1-#5 (S1-S5) and residents #2-#8 (R2-R8) , LPA unable to interview R1 as they are not available for to be interviewed. The investigation revealed the following: Continued on LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 27, 2023 · control 28-AS-20220217112823
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has inadequate record keeping
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Villalobos conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit for the allegation above. LPA met with Administrator Carlos Lara and the purpose of the visit was discussed. Initial visit was conducted on 5/13/21 by LPA Kruz and consisted of the following: LPA obtained a copy of the staff and resident roster, hospice agency information and interviewed Staff #1 and Staff #2. On todays visit, LPA Villalobos toured the physical plant and interviewed Staff #3-#5 (S3-S5) and residents #2-#8 (R2-R8) , LPA unable to interview R1 as they are not available for to be interviewed. The investigation revealed the following: Continued on LIC 9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 27, 2023 · control 28-AS-20210504155709
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained multiple injuries while in care. Areas of potential hazard to residents with poor eyesight were not kept inaccessible to residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Villalobos conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit for the allegation above. LPA met with Administrator Carlos Lara and the purpose of the visit was discussed. Initial visit was conducted on 12/7/21 by LPA Wesley and consisted of the following: LPA toured the physical plant did not observe there to be any health and safety concerns. LPA Wesley requested a copy of: staff roster, resident roster, and the following documents for resident #1 Admission agreement, Emergency Identification page(ID Page), current Physicians report, and the Appraisal needs and services plan. LPA Wesley interviewed Staff #1-#2 (S1-S2). On todays visit, LPA Villalobos toured the physical plant and interviewed Staff #1-#5 (S1-S5) and residents #2-#8 (R2-R8) , LPA unable to interview R1 as they are not available for to be interviewed. The investigation revealed the following: Continued on LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 27, 2023 · control 28-AS-20211206101003
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained a fracture while in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
***This report is a corrected version of the report dated 04/04/2023 due to a correction needed to the LIC9099D. Citation 87466 was incorrectly issued as a Type B citation, citation should have been issued as a Type A. The other citation 87405(d)(1) on report dated 04/04/23 was issued correctly. No other changes were made to the report. The complaint investigation findings remain Substantiated.*** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Wong conducted an unannounced complaint subsequent visit to render finding for the above allegation. LPA met with Receptionist Cecilia Espinoza and explained the reason of the visit. Shortly after, LPA met with Health and Wellness Director Anna Tupinyan and assisted with the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 3/29/2022, LPA conducted an initial complaint visit and a health and safety check. LPA toured the facility with Administrator and observed that the facility is clean and in good repair. LPA also observed supplies of nonperishCDSS inspection report, June 2, 2023 · control 28-AS-20220328103723
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings Staff financially abused resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At 11:05 am. on 04/20/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA met with the Administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. LPA and S2 toured the facility at 2:30 p.m. No immediate health or safety concerns were observed. Regarding the allegation “Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings”, it was alleged Staff #1 (S1) took the purse of Resident #1 (R1). LPA interviewed staff, R1, and R1’s friend between 1:00 p.m. and 2:45 p.m. and reviewed records between 2:00 p.m. and 2:45 p.m. on 04/20/2023. Information obtained through interviews and record review revealed S1 was not a facility staff. S1 was a private caregiver hired by R1. R1 and R1’s friend confirmed that R1 found their purse this morning and the allegation was untrue. Based on interviews and record review, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 20, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230418170420
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained a fracture while in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Wong conducted an unannounced complaint subsequent visit to render finding for the above allegation. LPA met with Receptionist Cecilia Espinoza and explained the reason of the visit. Shortly after, LPA met with Health and Wellness Director Anna Tupinyan and assisted with the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 3/29/2022, LPA conducted an initial complaint visit and a health and safety check. LPA toured the facility with Administrator and observed that the facility is clean and in good repair. LPA also observed supplies of nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days. Restrooms, handwashing basins, toilets and bathtub/showers are operable. There are no immediate health and safety concerns. The following documents were collected which included: staff and resident roster and documents for Resident#1-#3. (See LIC 9099C for continuation) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 4, 2023 · control 28-AS-20220328103723
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed. Facility did not meet the resident's dietary needs. 2. Facility food is of poor quality. 3. Facility did not provide a variety of foods. 4. Facility did not seek medical attention in a timely manner. 5. Facility staff are not adequately trained.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted a subsequent visit regarding the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Carlos Lara, and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 9/11/2020, LPA J. Katrdzhyan conducted the initial visit and requested for documents pertaining to Resident #1. On 3/14/23, LPA Chan did a follow up visit to interview the Administrator, 6 Staff, 9 Residents, and a Nutrition Consultant. The investigation revealed the following: Allegation - Facility did not meet the resident's dietary needs. It was alleged that Resident #1 (R-1) required a heart healthy diet which was ordered by the physician. According to the Administrator and kitchen staff, the cardiac or heart healthy diet means that the sodium should be limited to the resident. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 14, 2023 · control 28-AS-20200904141947
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedDue to neglect residents developed pressure injuries while in care Residents are left soiled for extended periods of time while in care Residents are not being provided appropriate care and supervision while in care Facility has insufficient staffing
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 02/22/2023 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Troy Agard conducted a subsequent complaint investigation at the above facility to address the following allegations. LPA Agard met with Carlos Lara, Administrator and explained the purpose of this visit was to deliver findings for this complaint. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA toured the physical plant. The facility is licensed to served 155 non - ambulatory residents, of which, 4 can be bedridden and has a hospice waiver for 20 residents. Facility is 4-stories in height, with a lobby, dining room located on the main floor, 2 activity rooms, kitchen, a small outdoor shaded patio, medication room located on the second floor, and a salon. LPA Agard conducted interviews and reviewed records on 01/18/2023 and 01/19/2023. Cont. on 9099C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 22, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230117091626

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident is left unattended Facility staff did not accompany resident to the hospital Facility interfering with resident's medical care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angelica Rea conducted a visit in response to the above allegations. On today's visit, LPA met with Administrator Carlos Lara, who assisted with the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: Interview(s) with Administrator, Staff #1 - Staff #3, Resident #1, Resident #1's son, Resident #1's companion, and review of resident #1's file. Regarding the allegation that resident #1 is left unattended and that facility staff did not accompany resident #1 to the hospital, the investigation revealed that resident #1 has lived at the facility since October 9, 2021. Resident #1 experienced a fall on 8/9/22, when she was going to a doctor appointment on her electric wheelchair. Resident #1 suffered a fractured tibia and was hospitalized. Review of resident #1's physician's report does not indicate that resident #1 is not able to leave the facility unassisted. Administrator and facility staff interviewed stated that resident #1 always refuses to have any faCDSS inspection report, December 5, 2022 · control 28-AS-20221129161405
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was exposed to amphetamines while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted a subsequent visit to deliver the finding for the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Carlos Lara, and explained the purpose for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 9/23/21, LPA Chan conducted the initial visit. LPA toured the facility with Administrator Lara and selected 10 residents' rooms to inspect. There were adequate food supplies of 2 days perishable and at least a week of non-perishable. LPA did not observe any health and safety concerns during the visit. LPA obtained copies of the staff roster, resident roster, and documents pertaining to Resident #1. The Department of Social Services Investigations Branch (IB) Investigator Peter Zertuche conducted a further investigation. (continue on LIC9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 27, 2022 · control 28-AS-20210922155543
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident's apartment smells malodorous
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst(s) (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation(s). LPA met with Carlos Lara Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 1/28/22 , LPA Chan toured the facility and gathered a copy of the staff roster, resident roster, and the housekeeping schedule for a week. On 7/19/22 LPA Flores conducted a tour of rooms #201,202,208,301,302,304, 401,402,404,406, alley/waste - trash containers/septic tank area, interview resident #1(R1),#2(R2),#3(R3),#4(R4),#5(R5),#6(R6),#7(R7),#8(R8),#9(R9),#10(R10), administrator (S1), staff #2(S2),#3(S3),#4(S4),#5(S5). The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Resident's apartment smells malodorous. It is alleged apartment smells like sewage and that the smell is making resident sick. Interviews with residents revealed 6 out of 10 residents stated they have not experienced malodorous smells in their rCDSS inspection report, July 19, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220125164903
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff removed resident's personal belongings without permission Facility did not communicate removal of personal belonging to responsible party
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Luis Mora conducted an unannounced complaint visit to determine the validity of the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Administrator Carlos Lara and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained a copy of the residents and staff rosters, conducted a tour of room number 126, and interviewed the Administrator, Resident 1 (R1), and R1's Social Worker. The investigation revealed the following: regarding the allegation "staff removed resident's personal belongings without permission", it is alleged that the facility staff removed an electrical burner from R1's room without permission. Interviews conducted with R1 and social worker revealed that it was not the staff that removed the electrical burner. R1's power of attorney (POA) removed the electrical burner and did not notified the facility. The social worker found out it was the POA yesterday during a telephone meeting. (CONTINUED TO LIC 9099C) UnsubstCDSS inspection report, July 19, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220715161618
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not provide resident adequate supervision.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 04/22/2022 approximately 10:30 am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gail Johnson and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Ulysses Coronel arrived at Glen Terra Assisted Living and conducted an unannounced complaint investigation. LPA and LPM met with Administrator Carlos Lara and the purpose of the visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: On 08/10/2021 LPA Bonnie Tao interviewed five (5) staff and one (1) resident. LPA Tao obtained a copy of staff records and resident records. On 04/22/2022, LPA Johnson and LPM Coronel interviewed toured the facility, reviewed facility and client R1’s records and interviewed administrator Lara. Report continues on LIC9099-C. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 22, 2022 · control 28-AS-20210802105346
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff failed to meet resident's medical needs. Staff are not allowing visitors. Staff failed to provide resident with a comfortable environment.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elizabeth Irra conducted the initial complaint investigation visit for the above allegations. LPA Irra met with Carlos Lara (Facility Administrator) and Tony Rios (Director of Communication Relations) and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. During this investigation, LPA interviewed Staff #1 through Staff #5. LPA also interviewed Resident #1 (R-1) and reviewed R-1’s file and obtained relevant documentation. LPA was unable to interview Resident #2 (R-2) as R-2 is non-verbal. Refer to LIC 9099C for the continuation of this report. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 21, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220414141042
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not preventing the spread of an outbreak.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Wendell Smith conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to finish investigation into the allegation above. LPA met with the administrator and explained the reason for this visit. LPA conducted a physical plant tour to ensure no immediate health and safety issues from 10:45-11:15pm. No immediate health and safety issues were noted. LPA observed staff to be wearing mask throughout the facility and hand sanitizers were available throughout the facility. LPA conducted the intial visit on 4/1/2020 where interview was done with the administrator. It is alleged that facility staff failed to wear mask consistently around the facility and were not ensuring that residents were social distancing from one another. Since this complaint came in facility had an annual visit on 8/3/21 and a case management visit on 10/5/21. During both visits it was noted that staff were not wearing mask properly and that residents were not observed to be social distancing byCDSS inspection report, April 12, 2022 · control 31-AS-20200325144834
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not following COVID-19 outbreak guidance.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted a complaint investigation for the allegation listed above. LPA arrived unannounced and met with Carlos Lara, the Administrator. The purpose of the visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Chan toured the facility with the Administrator. LPA obtained copies of the staff and resident rosters, COVID-19 Mitigation Report, and In-Service training logs. LPA also interviewed the Administrator, 7 Staff, and 10 Residents. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation, Facility is not following COVID-19 outbreak guidance. LPA toured the facility and observed the following pertaining to the allegation: The Staff are all wearing their surgical/N95 masks correctly. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 28, 2022 · control 28-NP-20220125080926
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not reporting COVID-19 cases.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted a complaint investigation for the allegations listed above. LPA arrived unannounced and met with Carlos Lara, the Administrator. The purpose of the visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Chan toured the facility with the Administrator. LPA obtained copies of the staff and resident rosters, COVID-19 Mitigation Report, and In-Service training logs. LPA also interviewed the Administrator, 7 Staff, and 10 Residents. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation - Facility is not reporting the Coronavirus (COVID-19) cases. Based on the interviews with the Administrator and Staff, they all indicated that if there are positive COVID-19 cases at the facility, everyone is informed. Staff are aware of the recently confirmed positive case. (Continue on LIC9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 28, 2022 · control 28-NP-20220125080926

2021

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents are being subjected to second-hand smoke. Facility has pest infestation. Facility is not notifying residents of bedbugs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angelica Rea conducted an unannounced complaint visit in response to the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Carlos Lara, Director of Community relations, Tony Rios who assisted with today's visit. Regarding the allegation that residents are being subjected to second -hand smoke, the investigation consisted of interviews with Licensee, Administrator, Director of community relations and resident #1 - resident #8. Staff interviewed stated that they have been notified by some residents that resident #1 has smoked in his room. Staff stated that smoking is not allowed in the facility. Staff interviewed said that there is a designated smoking area on the patio, and they have reminded resident #1 that smoking in resident rooms is not permitted. Resident #1 denied that he smokes in his room. He stated that he is aware of the house rules, and complies with them. 8 out of 8 residents interviewed, stated that they are not being subjected to second hand sCDSS inspection report, December 30, 2021 · control 28-AS-20211223152217
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident smoking at the facility where oxygen is in use.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Sicairos conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Carlos Lara and explained the reason of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained copies of Resident & Staff Rosters, Admission Agreement, House Rules, Physicians Report and Resident Appraisal for Resident #1. LPA interviewed Staff #1 - Staff #5 and Resident #1 - Resident #9. LPA also toured the facility which included the common areas and random sample of resident rooms. The investigation revealed the following: in regards to the allegation "resident smoking at the facility where oxygen is in use", it is alleged that there are residents in the 2nd floor of the facility that are smoking in their rooms. Interview conducted with Administrator revealed that residents are not allowed to smoke in their rooms. There is a designated smoking area in the facility which is located in the front of the facility. (CONTINUCDSS inspection report, December 1, 2021 · control 28-AS-20211124164511
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff threatened to evict resident illegally. Front door not working properly. Elevators are not working properly. Staff do not respond to pendents in a timely manner. Food service is inadequate.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Wong conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Carlos Lara and explained the reason of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA interviewed ten residents (R1-R10), administrator and five (5) staff (S1-S5) and obtained copy of the documents included residents roster, faciltiyn dining service menu, R1's Identifiction and Emeregency Information, Admission Agreement, Physician Report. Appraisal/Needs and Service Plan, Resident Appraisal and 30 day eviction notice dated on 10/9/2021. The investigation revelaed of the following: Allegation#1 "Staff threatened to evict resident illegally." LPA interviewed ten residents and nine residents reported there are no staff ever threatened them. (See LIC9099C for continuation) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 23, 2021 · control 28-AS-20211115134302
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident's colostomy bag is not being regularly changed
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
This report supersedes report created on 8/10/21 to correct resident #1 to resident #4 and residents' interview finding. On 8/10/21 Licensing Program Analyst(s) (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Flores met with Jessica Almendarez receptionist and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Carlos Lara arrived an hour later. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Flores requested staff/resident roster, interviewed executive director, wellness director, staff #1(S1),#2(S2),#3(S3),#4(S4),#5(S5), and residents #1(R1),#2(R2), #3(R3),#4(R4),#5(R5),#6(R6),#7(R7),#8(R8), reviewed residents files and requested copies of needs and care plan, physician's report, and care notes for all 8 residents. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Resident's colostomy bag is not being regularly changed. It is alleged facility doesn't change resident's colostomy bags timely and bag had not been changCDSS inspection report, October 5, 2021 · control 28-AS-20210806114742
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not providing comfortable living accommodations to resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Villalobos conducted a subsequent complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Villalobos met Administrator Carlos Lara and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Villalobos requested staff/resident roster, interviewed staff #1-#5 (S1-S5), and residents #1-#6 (R1-R6), LPA toured the facility and observed rooms #111, # 222, #325 and #402. The investigation revealed the following: In regards to the allegation, "Facility is not providing comfortable living accommodations to resident " it was alleged that residents with wheelchairs could not access the bathrooms sinks. (5) of (5) staff interviewed denied the allegation. (6) of (6) residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. LPA observed that each resident room has a private bathroom... Continued on LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 22, 2021 · control 28-AS-20191127133704
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not safeguard resident's personal property
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Nune Margaryan and Tony Vasallo conducted subsequent visit to the facility to further investigate the above noted allegation. LPAs met with Administrator Carlos Lara and explained the purpose of this visit. It was alleged that facility resident #1’s (R1’s) personal property was stolen at the facility. The stolen items include wedding ring and “stimulus card”. The initial visit was conducted by LPA Joe Katrdzhyan on 04/21/21. During the visit LPA Joe Katrdzhyan obtained the following documents: • Admission Agreement • Pre-placement Appraisal Information • Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan • Physician's Report • Functional Capability Assessment • Client/Resident Personal Property and Valuables Form • Resident Roster • Staff Roster Today's investigation consisted of the following: Request Resident's and staff roster; obtained theft and loss policy, interviewed five (5) staff and eight (8) residents. con. 9099C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 27, 2021 · control 28-AS-20210412091729
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident's colostomy bag is not being regularly changed
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst(s) (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unnounced complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Flores met with Jessica Almendarez receptionist and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Carlos Lara arrived an hour later. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Flores requested staff/resident roster, interviewed executive director,wellness director, staff #1(S1),#2(S2),#3(S3),#4(S4),#5(S5), and residents #1(R1),#2(R2), #3(R3),#4(R4),#5(R5),#6(R6),#7(R7),#8(R8), reviewed residents files and requested copies of needs and care plan, physician's report, and care notes for all 8 residents. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Resident's colostomy bag is not beign regularly changed. It is alleged facility doesn't change resident's colostomy bags timely and bag had not been changed in 14 hours and was starting to leak. During interviews with residents 2 out of 8 residents stated to not need assistance from nurseCDSS inspection report, August 10, 2021 · control 28-AS-20210806114742
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not assist resident with their medication in a timely manner Staff did not assist resident with their toileting needs in a timely manner Staff did not assist resident with their oxygen administration in a timely manner
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Villalobos initiated a complaint investigation for the allegation(s) listed above. Today’s complaint investigation was conducted with Administrator Carlos Lara and purpose of the visit was discussed. Today's investigation consisted of the following: LPA Villalobos interviewed staff #1-#4 (S1-S5) and residents #1-#6 (R1-R6). LPA also obtained and reviewed copies of the following documents in reference to R1; Admission Agreement • Pre-placement Appraisal Information • Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan • Physician's Report • Resident Roster • Staff Roster Todays investigation revealed the following: In regards to the allegation " Staff did not assist resident with their medication in a timely manner" it was alleged that staff took more than an hour to provide R1 with their medication on 7/16/21 after reaching out to them. Continued on LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 21, 2021 · control 28-AS-20210716081320

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 50 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
7
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
6
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
32
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
50
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(818) 291-1918
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Glen Terra Assisted Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.