Village At Northridge, The is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Northridge, Los Angeles County, California — state license #197608838, licensed for 194 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 23 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated July 1, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

11 homes in view

Village At Northridge, The

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 194 residents · Northridge, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairMemory care not on fileHospice not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #197608838, held since 2015 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
9222 Corbin Ave · Northridge, Los Angeles County
Phone
(818) 350-2951
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryVerified in record
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
BEDROOMS 138-152,155,166,169-171 CLEARED FOR BEDRIDDEN. BEDROOMS 153,154,156-165,167,168,172,202-224,245-273 ARE CLEARED FOR NON-AMBULATORY.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 26 times and filed 23 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 1, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 1, 2026
Occupancy at the April 23, 2026 visit
174 of 194 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 14 documents with transcribed findings, dated December 15, 2021 to April 23, 2026. 14 of the 14 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unfounded” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (6). 14 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 14 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 17 of 23 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 23, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure food was free of contamination resulting in multiple illness to residents in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mariana Agban conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit for the above allegation. LPA arrived, was greeted by the receptionist, and met with the Assisted Living Director, Mary Okhata, explaining the reason for the visit. LPA requested copies of pertinent information, including the Staff Roster, Resident Roster, Discharge Notes for R1, R2, R3, and R4, and other documents pertinent to the investigation. Today's investigation consisted of interviews with ten residents and four staff members. . Regarding the allegation: Staff did not ensure food was free of contamination resulting in multiple illness to residents in care. It was alleged that several residents contracted food poisoning due to food served at the facility on 04/02/2026.LPA conducted interviews with Staff #1 (S1), Staff #2 (S2), Staff #3 (S3), and Staff #4 (S4), none of whom were able to confirm the allegation. (Continue on 9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 23, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260414111909
20257 state visits · 8 documents
Dec 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not properly address resident's multiple falls at facility.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mariana Agban conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to include additional interviews for the Substantiated complaint report on 12/30/2024. LPA arrived and was greeted by the receptionist and met with the Assisted Living Director Mary Okahata, and explained the reason for the visit. LPA requested copies of pertinent information, which includes LIC 500 and the Resident Roster. LPA conducted a physical plan tour to ensure the health and safety of the residents are protected and are in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. During today's visit, LPA interviewed an additional 5 residents, 3 staff member, and the Executive Director. Based on information obtained, the allegation remains Substantiated at this time. Facility staff did not properly address multiple falls at the facility. Resident#1(R1) Service Plan acknowledges that R1 is a fall risk; however did not address actions taken to prevent future falls. R1 had 18 fall incidents at the facilithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2025 · control 31-AS-20241213122323
Sep 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 31, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not make resident records available to resident's authorized representative

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mariana Agban conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit for the above allegation. LPA arrived and was greeted by the receptionist and met with Executive Director Thomas Rekowski and explained the reason for the visit. LPA requested copies of pertinent information which includes LIC 500 and Resident Roster. LPA conducted a physical plan tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and are in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Today's investigation consisted of interviews with 15 out of 160 residents, 1 staff members and record review. Allegation: Staff did not make resident records available to resident's authorized representative It was alleged that staff did not make Resident#1's (R1) records available to R1's authorized representative. Per the complainant, the written request was sent on 02/24/25, however, there was no response from facility staff until 03/25/25. Interview with Staff#1(S1) revealed that there was a delay dthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 4, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250325133704
20247 state visits · 7 documents
Dec 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not properly address resident's multiple falls at facility.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Mariana Agban and Michael Cava conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit for the above allegation. LPAs arrived and were greeted by the receptionist and met with the Assisted Living Director and explained the reason for the visit. LPAs requested copies of pertinent information which includes LIC 500 and Resident Roster. LPAs conducted a physical plan tour to ensure the resident's health and safety were protected and in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. On today's visit, LPAs conducted additional resident and staff interviews and obtained additional documentation relevant to the investigation. Allegation: Staff did not properly address resident's multiple falls at facility. It was alleged that staff failed to properly address Resident#1(R1) multiple falls at the facility. Interview with Staff#1(S1) revealed that R1 is a fall risk and sustained multiple falls causing wounds and skin tears. LPAs conducted a file review and observed that R1'sthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 30, 2024 · control 31-AS-20241213122323
Oct 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff yelled at resident in care Facility staff did not treat residents with dignity and respect.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mariana Agban conducted unannounced subsequent complaint visit to include additional interviews for the Substantiated complaint report on 8/15/24. LPA arrived and was greeted by the receptionist and met with Executive Director and explained the reason for the visit. LPA requested copies of pertinent information which include LIC 500 and Resident Roster. LPA conducted a physical plan tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. During today's visit, LPA interviewed 15 out of 150 residents. The allegations remain Substantiated. POC is cleared as of 08/19/24. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report delivered. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240809162409
Sep 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility not clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mariana Agban conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit for the above allegation. LPA arrived and was greeted by the receptionist and met with Assisted Living Director and explained the reason for the visit. LPA requested copies of pertinent information which includes LIC 500 and Resident Roster. LPA conducted a physical plan tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and are in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Allegation: Facility not clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair It was alleged that the facility has mold and leak issues in different areas, including residents' rooms on the third floor, the basement ceiling, Staff break room, and staff restrooms. LPA toured residents rooms on the third and second floors and observed no mold or leak issues. LPA also toured the basement, staff breakroom, and restrooms and observed no leak or mold issues. LPA interviewed the Assisted Living Director and 10 staff members and 15 othe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 11, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240905092917
Aug 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff yelled at resident in care Facility staff did not treat residents with dignity and respect.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mariana Agban conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit for the above allegations. LPA arrived and was greeted by the receptionist and met with Director Assisted Living and explained the reason for the visit. LPA requested copies of pertinent information which include LIC 500 and Resident Roster. LPA conducted a physical plan tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Allegation: Facility staff yelled at resident in care It was alleged that facility staff yelled at R1 about R1's pet. Interview with S1 denied the allegation. S1 stated that they were trying to explain the situation to R1 and their voice might have elevated from frustration. Interview with staff revealed that S1 and R1 were in the medication room where S1 was asking staff to witness R1's pet urinating in the facility hallways and on the walls. Six (6) out of 10 staff members confirmed that S1 yelled at the R1. Basethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 15, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240809162409
May 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff made financial decisions on behalf of resident without proper authorization Staff turned off resident's telephone service Staff turned off resident's Wi-Fi service

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mariana Agban conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit for the above allegations. LPA arrived and was greeted by the receptionist and requested the Administrator. The Nursing Director Represnantive greeted and assisted LPA until Executive Director arrived. LPA conducted a physical plan tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. LPA requested copies of pertinent information which include LIC 500 and Resident Roster. Interview with Executive Director and records review revealed that R1 lives in the independent living community part of the facility and not the Assisted living section which is licensed by Community Care Licensing. The department does not have jurisdiction in the Independent Living section of the facility. LPA obtained copies of R1's Residency and Service Agreement. Based on the information LPA gathered LPA determined that the allegation is unfounded. A finding of uthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240517081647
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations3typical 1
Substantiated complaints4typical 2
Total complaints10typical 7
State visits on file26typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2015.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202622020257822024773202333020223402021220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
If end-of-life care were ever needed, could they stay here? What’s the plan?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (818) 350-2951

Is Village At Northridge, The licensed?

Yes — Village At Northridge, The is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Northridge (Los Angeles County): California license #197608838, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 194 residents. State records list 23 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 1, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Village At Northridge, The care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Village At Northridge, The with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory; it does not list dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordBEDROOMS 138-152,155,166,169-171 CLEARED FOR BEDRIDDEN. BEDROOMS 153,154,156-165,167,168,172,202-224,245-273 ARE CLEARED FOR NON-AMBULATORY.

How much does Village At Northridge, The cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Village At Northridge, The's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Village At Northridge, The accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Village At Northridge, The is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

174 of 194 beds occupied (90%) when the state visited on April 23, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Village At Northridge, The?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 26 state visits and 23 dated documents since 2021 for Village At Northridge, The; 14 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 23, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

14 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure food was free of contamination resulting in multiple illness to residents in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mariana Agban conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit for the above allegation. LPA arrived, was greeted by the receptionist, and met with the Assisted Living Director, Mary Okhata, explaining the reason for the visit. LPA requested copies of pertinent information, including the Staff Roster, Resident Roster, Discharge Notes for R1, R2, R3, and R4, and other documents pertinent to the investigation. Today's investigation consisted of interviews with ten residents and four staff members. . Regarding the allegation: Staff did not ensure food was free of contamination resulting in multiple illness to residents in care. It was alleged that several residents contracted food poisoning due to food served at the facility on 04/02/2026.LPA conducted interviews with Staff #1 (S1), Staff #2 (S2), Staff #3 (S3), and Staff #4 (S4), none of whom were able to confirm the allegation. (Continue on 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 23, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260414111909

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not properly address resident's multiple falls at facility.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mariana Agban conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to include additional interviews for the Substantiated complaint report on 12/30/2024. LPA arrived and was greeted by the receptionist and met with the Assisted Living Director Mary Okahata, and explained the reason for the visit. LPA requested copies of pertinent information, which includes LIC 500 and the Resident Roster. LPA conducted a physical plan tour to ensure the health and safety of the residents are protected and are in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. During today's visit, LPA interviewed an additional 5 residents, 3 staff member, and the Executive Director. Based on information obtained, the allegation remains Substantiated at this time. Facility staff did not properly address multiple falls at the facility. Resident#1(R1) Service Plan acknowledges that R1 is a fall risk; however did not address actions taken to prevent future falls. R1 had 18 fall incidents at the faciliCDSS inspection report, September 26, 2025 · control 31-AS-20241213122323
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not make resident records available to resident's authorized representative
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mariana Agban conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit for the above allegation. LPA arrived and was greeted by the receptionist and met with Executive Director Thomas Rekowski and explained the reason for the visit. LPA requested copies of pertinent information which includes LIC 500 and Resident Roster. LPA conducted a physical plan tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and are in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Today's investigation consisted of interviews with 15 out of 160 residents, 1 staff members and record review. Allegation: Staff did not make resident records available to resident's authorized representative It was alleged that staff did not make Resident#1's (R1) records available to R1's authorized representative. Per the complainant, the written request was sent on 02/24/25, however, there was no response from facility staff until 03/25/25. Interview with Staff#1(S1) revealed that there was a delay dCDSS inspection report, April 4, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250325133704

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not properly address resident's multiple falls at facility.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Mariana Agban and Michael Cava conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit for the above allegation. LPAs arrived and were greeted by the receptionist and met with the Assisted Living Director and explained the reason for the visit. LPAs requested copies of pertinent information which includes LIC 500 and Resident Roster. LPAs conducted a physical plan tour to ensure the resident's health and safety were protected and in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. On today's visit, LPAs conducted additional resident and staff interviews and obtained additional documentation relevant to the investigation. Allegation: Staff did not properly address resident's multiple falls at facility. It was alleged that staff failed to properly address Resident#1(R1) multiple falls at the facility. Interview with Staff#1(S1) revealed that R1 is a fall risk and sustained multiple falls causing wounds and skin tears. LPAs conducted a file review and observed that R1'sCDSS inspection report, December 30, 2024 · control 31-AS-20241213122323
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff yelled at resident in care Facility staff did not treat residents with dignity and respect.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mariana Agban conducted unannounced subsequent complaint visit to include additional interviews for the Substantiated complaint report on 8/15/24. LPA arrived and was greeted by the receptionist and met with Executive Director and explained the reason for the visit. LPA requested copies of pertinent information which include LIC 500 and Resident Roster. LPA conducted a physical plan tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. During today's visit, LPA interviewed 15 out of 150 residents. The allegations remain Substantiated. POC is cleared as of 08/19/24. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report delivered. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 3, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240809162409
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility not clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mariana Agban conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit for the above allegation. LPA arrived and was greeted by the receptionist and met with Assisted Living Director and explained the reason for the visit. LPA requested copies of pertinent information which includes LIC 500 and Resident Roster. LPA conducted a physical plan tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and are in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Allegation: Facility not clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair It was alleged that the facility has mold and leak issues in different areas, including residents' rooms on the third floor, the basement ceiling, Staff break room, and staff restrooms. LPA toured residents rooms on the third and second floors and observed no mold or leak issues. LPA also toured the basement, staff breakroom, and restrooms and observed no leak or mold issues. LPA interviewed the Assisted Living Director and 10 staff members and 15 oCDSS inspection report, September 11, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240905092917
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff yelled at resident in care Facility staff did not treat residents with dignity and respect.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mariana Agban conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit for the above allegations. LPA arrived and was greeted by the receptionist and met with Director Assisted Living and explained the reason for the visit. LPA requested copies of pertinent information which include LIC 500 and Resident Roster. LPA conducted a physical plan tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Allegation: Facility staff yelled at resident in care It was alleged that facility staff yelled at R1 about R1's pet. Interview with S1 denied the allegation. S1 stated that they were trying to explain the situation to R1 and their voice might have elevated from frustration. Interview with staff revealed that S1 and R1 were in the medication room where S1 was asking staff to witness R1's pet urinating in the facility hallways and on the walls. Six (6) out of 10 staff members confirmed that S1 yelled at the R1. BaseCDSS inspection report, August 15, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240809162409
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff made financial decisions on behalf of resident without proper authorization Staff turned off resident's telephone service Staff turned off resident's Wi-Fi service
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mariana Agban conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit for the above allegations. LPA arrived and was greeted by the receptionist and requested the Administrator. The Nursing Director Represnantive greeted and assisted LPA until Executive Director arrived. LPA conducted a physical plan tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. LPA requested copies of pertinent information which include LIC 500 and Resident Roster. Interview with Executive Director and records review revealed that R1 lives in the independent living community part of the facility and not the Assisted living section which is licensed by Community Care Licensing. The department does not have jurisdiction in the Independent Living section of the facility. LPA obtained copies of R1's Residency and Service Agreement. Based on the information LPA gathered LPA determined that the allegation is unfounded. A finding of uCDSS inspection report, May 23, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240517081647

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 26 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
4
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
10
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
26
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(818) 350-2951
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Village At Northridge, The? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.