Atria Santa Clarita is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Santa Clarita, Los Angeles County, California — state license #197608685, licensed for 160 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 27 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated April 24, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

10 homes in view

Atria Santa Clarita

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 160 residents · Santa Clarita, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #197608685, held since 2015 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
24431 Lyons Ave · Santa Clarita, Los Angeles County
Phone
(661) 254-9933
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 160 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 13 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 67 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
160 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 67 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN (1ST & 2ND) FLOORS OF VILLA 1 & 2. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 13. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS (VILLA 2).State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 38 times and filed 27 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 24, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 16, 2026
Occupancy at the August 16, 2024 visit
130 of 160 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 25 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 19, 2021 to August 16, 2024. 25 of the 25 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (7), “Unsubstantiated” (18). 25 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 25 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 12 of 27 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
Apr 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 22, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20247 state visits · 7 documents
Sep 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are illegally evicting resident Staff obtained & billed resident for services not agreed upon Staff did not provide requested records to resident's authorized representative

This is an amended copy of the report previously issued on 8/16/2024 and 5/30/2023. This report supersedes reports previously issued. The findings for this complaint remain the same. On 8/14/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Spaeth conducted a subsequent complaint investigation at the above facility to address the following allegation(s). LPA Spaeth was met by the Resident Services Director, Venca Avivi who stated the Administrator would be arriving to the facility. LPA was greeted by the Executive Director, April Princesa at 11:20 am. LPA explained the purpose of this visit was to present the findings. The investigation consisted of the following: On 5/30/2023 LPA Spaeth initiated a complaint investigation for the allegation(s) listed above. LPA Spaeth requested the resident roster and copies of residents’ files. During the visit, LPA received the documentation. Continued on 9099C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 16, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230524170317
Jun 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Residents safety pendents are inoperable

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tuesday Cabiness conducted an unannounced complaint visit and met with the Executive Director (ED) April Princesa, who was informed the reason of the visit. The following was determined: It was alleged the resident's safety pendents were not operable. During today's visit, from 945am to 1230pm, LPA conducted a physical plant inspection, interviewed residents and staff, and reviewed facility documents. On 01/19/2024, the ED and facility staff were notified by residents that there pendants were not working. The alarm was tested, and it was determined by the IT Support team the computer system had crashed, and needed to be replaced. The ED reported to LPA, it took (4) days to repair, and on 01/22/2024, the system was operating properly. LPA verified the system was operating, by having staff do a test check. Residents were notified the system was not working and when it was repaired. LPA confirmed that during interviews with residents. Also LPA obtained facithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 23, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240122091521
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations7typical 1
Type B citations3typical 1
Substantiated complaints12typical 2
Total complaints14typical 7
State visits on file38typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2015.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20263302025220202477120233302022192062021330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2024 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (661) 254-9933

Is Atria Santa Clarita licensed?

Yes — Atria Santa Clarita is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Santa Clarita (Los Angeles County): California license #197608685, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 160 residents. State records list 27 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated April 24, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Atria Santa Clarita care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Atria Santa Clarita with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record160 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 67 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN (1ST & 2ND) FLOORS OF VILLA 1 & 2. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 13. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS (VILLA 2).

How much does Atria Santa Clarita cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Atria Santa Clarita's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Atria Santa Clarita accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Atria Santa Clarita is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

130 of 160 beds occupied (81%) when the state visited on August 16, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Atria Santa Clarita?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 38 state visits and 27 dated documents since 2021 for Atria Santa Clarita; 25 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated August 16, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

25 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are illegally evicting resident Staff obtained & billed resident for services not agreed upon Staff did not provide requested records to resident's authorized representative
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
This is an amended copy of the report previously issued on 8/16/2024 and 5/30/2023. This report supersedes reports previously issued. The findings for this complaint remain the same. On 8/14/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Spaeth conducted a subsequent complaint investigation at the above facility to address the following allegation(s). LPA Spaeth was met by the Resident Services Director, Venca Avivi who stated the Administrator would be arriving to the facility. LPA was greeted by the Executive Director, April Princesa at 11:20 am. LPA explained the purpose of this visit was to present the findings. The investigation consisted of the following: On 5/30/2023 LPA Spaeth initiated a complaint investigation for the allegation(s) listed above. LPA Spaeth requested the resident roster and copies of residents’ files. During the visit, LPA received the documentation. Continued on 9099C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 16, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230524170317
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents safety pendents are inoperable
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tuesday Cabiness conducted an unannounced complaint visit and met with the Executive Director (ED) April Princesa, who was informed the reason of the visit. The following was determined: It was alleged the resident's safety pendents were not operable. During today's visit, from 945am to 1230pm, LPA conducted a physical plant inspection, interviewed residents and staff, and reviewed facility documents. On 01/19/2024, the ED and facility staff were notified by residents that there pendants were not working. The alarm was tested, and it was determined by the IT Support team the computer system had crashed, and needed to be replaced. The ED reported to LPA, it took (4) days to repair, and on 01/22/2024, the system was operating properly. LPA verified the system was operating, by having staff do a test check. Residents were notified the system was not working and when it was repaired. LPA confirmed that during interviews with residents. Also LPA obtained faciCDSS inspection report, January 23, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240122091521

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff failed to properly report incident to authorized representative
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
This is an amendment of the report issued on 04/27/23 to rectify a typographical error. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Business Office manager and informed the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:30 AM, requested copy of facility documents relevant to the investigation and reviewed the same from 10:00 AM to 11:30 AM. LPA also conducted interview with staff from 11:30 AM to 12:30 PM. It was alleged that there was no communication from the facility about Resident #1 (R1) to family member (FM) being rushed to emergency surgery for a broken hip on 10/21/19. LPA's record review today between 10:00 AM to 11:30 AM revealed that staff called the family member of R1 and Primary Care Physician (PCP) on the night of the incident on 10/20/19 at around 11:30 PM. LPA's interview with the former Staff #1 (S1) today at 12:10 PM, who attendedCDSS inspection report, April 27, 2023 · control 31-AS-20200225154209
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLack of Care and supervision resulting to dehydration
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
This is an amendment of the report issued on 10/28/22 to change the findings. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to deliver the findings for the above allegation. LPA met with staff Venca Avivi and explained the reason for today’s visit. On 05/10/21, a complaint was received by the Woodland Hills Adult and Senior Care Regional Office. The complaint was referred to and accepted by Community Care Licensing Division’s Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to IB investigator Olivia Spindola. On 05/11/2021 at 11:00 AM, LPAs Tuesday Cabiness and Rosaura Valenzuela initiated the complaint visit. LPAs Cabiness and Valenzuela conducted physical plant tour and obtained copies of the facility records relevant to the investigation. (continued on LIC 9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 18, 2023 · control 31-AS-20210510084331

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff diagnosed resident without proper consent Resident sustained an injury from a fall while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Resident Services Director Venca Avivi and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:40 AM, requested copy of facility documents relevant to the investigation and reviewed the same from 10:00 AM to 1:00 PM. LPA also conducted interview with staff from 1:00 PM to 2:30 PM. Regarding the allegation that staff diagnosed resident without proper consent, it was alleged that the facility did not inform Resident #1 (R1)'s family member regarding a doctor's visit to evaluate R1 which resulted to a new diagnosis. LPA's record review today between 10:00 AM to 1:00 PM revealed that R1 was already diagnosed with Dementia prior to moving in at the facility. Further review also revealed that it was R1's PCP who ordered the evaluation and not the facility staff. (continued on LIC 9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 9, 2022 · control 31-AS-20200225154209
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff not providing assistance to residents in a timely manner.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Abeye Duguma conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with the Executive Director (ED), Johnny Ortiz, and discussed the reason for the visit. --- Facility staff not providing assistance to residents in a timely manner. It was alleged that the residents are waiting a long period of time because the facility is understaffed. To investigate the allegation, on 10/31/2022 at 10:45 AM, LPA requested records, at 12:00 PM, LPA interviewed residents, at 1:45 PM, LPA made observations and, at 2:00 PM, LPA interviewed staff. Record reviews show that in the past seven days the call button was used two hundred sixty four times (264), the average response time was seven minutes (07) and there is at least one caregiver per floor per shift caring for an average ten (10) residents per floor in the Memory Care building and twenty eight (28) in the Assisted Living building. (Cont. on LIC9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 31, 2022 · control 31-AS-20221027112508
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLack of Care and supervision resulting to multiple falls sustaining severe injuries Due to insufficient staffing residents needs were not met
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
This is an amendment of the report issued on 10/28/22 to partially change the findings. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to deliver the findings for the above allegation. LPA met with staff Venca Avivi and explained the reason for today’s visit. On 05/10/21, a complaint was received by the Woodland Hills Adult and Senior Care Regional Office. The complaint was referred to and accepted by Community Care Licensing Division’s Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to IB investigator Olivia Spindola. On 05/11/2021 at 11:00 AM, LPAs Tuesday Cabiness and Rosaura Valenzuela initiated the complaint visit. LPAs Cabiness and Valenzuela conducted physical plant tour and obtained copies of the facility records relevant to the investigation. (continued on LIC 9099-C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 28, 2022 · control 31-AS-20210510084331
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff billed resident for services not being provided. Changes in resident’s condition was not discussed with the family and physician.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Abeye Duguma conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Johnny Ortiz and discussed the reason for the visit. --- Facility staff billed resident for services not being provided. --- Changes in resident’s condition was not discussed with the family and physician. It was alleged that resident #1 (R1) is being billed for care they are not receiving, and that staff reassessed the R1 but did not inform their doctor. To investigate these allegations, on 09/06/2022 at 12:30 PM, LPA interviewed staff, on 09/06/2022 at 2:30PM, LPA requested pertinent documents and, on 10/06/2022 at 01:30 PM, LPA interviewed the Reporting Party (RP). During interviews with staff, they stated they do not charge for services not provided, that R1 was at a Level One (01) with Level One (01) Medication assistance, that R1's spouse requested for a higher level of care by phone and after a reassessment of needs, the level of care was increased to LCDSS inspection report, October 17, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220829113112
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure that resident's hygiene needs were met. Staff did not provide appropriate incontinent care. Staff issued an improper eviction notice to resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Abeye Duguma conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Johnny Ortiz, Executive Director (ED), and discussed the reason for the visit. --- Staff did not ensure that resident's hygiene needs were met. It was alleged that resident #1 (R1) was found to be malodorous during a visit by the Reporting Party (RP). To investigate this allegation, on 09/06/2022 at 12:30 PM, LPA interviewed staff and residents, on 10/06/2022 at 01:30 PM, LPA interviewed the Reporting Party (RP). In addition to the interviews, on 10/10/2022 at 12:30 PM, LPA conducted a physical inspection of randomly selected rooms. (Cont. on LIC 9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 10, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220829113112
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident is not being assisted with services. Facility did not communicate with authorized representative about change of services being provided. Facility is in disrepair.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abeye Duguma conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to obtain additional information for the above noted allegations. LPA met with the Executive Director (ED), Johnny Ortiz, and discussed the reason for the visit. --- Resident is not being assisted with services. It was alleged that resident #1 (R1) was not getting the services that the family pays for, such as diaper changing, wrapping his left leg and changing his bedding. To investigate this allegation, on 03/16/2022 at 10:15am, LPA interviewed staff and on 04/20/2022 at 3:30pm, LPA interviewed residents and conducted a physical inspection of randomly selected rooms including R1’s room. The observations and interviews revealed that the beddings were clean and, according to staff, they are changed once a week or as needed. (CONT. on LIC9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 29, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220315143212
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents door is in disrepair
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Abeye Duguma conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit. LPA met with Venca Avivi and discussed the reason for the visit. ---Residents door is in disrepair It was reported that the resident's door is in disrepair. To investigate this allegation, on 03/11/2022, between 12:30pm - 2:30pm and on 05/02/2022 between 2:15 PM - 3:20 PM, LPA conducted interviews and requested pertinent documents. The interviews revealed that the resident would often aggressively handle the door, motioning the door handle up and down beyond its intended design limitations and it eventually broke. Although documents revealed that a work order was place for repairs on 03/08/2021 at 12:43pm and the door was repaired the following day, the facility failed to completely remove the mechanism from the disrepaired door which resulted in a visitor and resident being locked in the room. (Cont. on LIC 9099-C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 24, 2022 · control 31-AS-20200309111042
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff not providing resident’s medications as prescribed.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Abeye Duguma conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to obtain additional information for the above noted allegation. LPA met with Venca Avivi and discussed the reason for the visit. --- Staff not providing resident’s medications as prescribed. It was alleged that the Resident #1 (R1) was given his potassium pills twice a day instead of once a day as written on the bottle. To investigate this allegation, on 03/16/2022 at 11:50am, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) requested pertinent documents and, on 04/20/2022 at 3:45pm, LPA interviewed staff and complainant. A review of R1’s Physician’s Orders revealed that R1 was prescribed potassium 10mg once daily, yet the Medication Administration Records (MAR) dated 08/20/2020 shows that the facility administered the medication twice daily. (Cont. on LIC9099-C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 24, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220315143212
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not seek timely medical care for resident. Facility has C diff contamination.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Abeye Duguma conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to the facility. Upon entry, LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Johnny Ortiz, and explained the reason for the visit. --- Staff did not seek timely medical care for resident. It was alleged that the facility did not seek timely medical attention for Resident #1 (R1). To investigate this allegation on 04/06/2022 LPA interviewed staff and requested pertinent documents from 11:00 AM - 2:20 PM. Interviews and record reviews revealed that the facility staff completed a Notice of Change in Condition on 05/03/2020, 05/06/2020 and 05/11/2020 and faxed them to the physician at HealthCare Partners Medical Group and Affiliated Physicians. (Cont. on LIC9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 26, 2022 · control 31-AS-20200521113557
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not assist with showering.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Abeye Duguma conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to obtain additional information for the above noted allegations. LPA met with Johnny Ortiz, Executive Director (ED), and discussed the reason for the visit. --- Staff do not assist with showering. It was alleged that R1 did not shower for weeks. To investigate this allegation, on 03/16/2022 at 10:15am, LPA interviewed staff and on 04/20/2022 at 3:45pm, LPA conducted a physical inspection of randomly selected rooms and interviewed staff between 3:30pm-4:30pm. The observations and interviews revealed that all hygiene needs are being met, that each resident has a shower schedule, but are also showered more often if needed, and that caregivers are on standby for those who need assistance. (CONT. on LIC9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 20, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220315143212
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident's walker was in disrepair Staff did not safeguard residents personal belongings
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Resident Care Director Venca Avivi and informed the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:50 AM, requested facility records relevant to the investigation at 10:30 AM and conducted interview with staff between 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that resident's walker was in disrepair, it was alleged that Resident #1 (R1)'s walker leg falls off when being picked up. LPA's interview with four (4) staff on 03/26/22 between 10:00 AM to 2:00 PM and two (2) staff today between 10:00 AM to 1:00 PM revealed that no one was aware that R1's walker was broken until it was reported by R1's family member on 04/02/21. LPA's record review on 03/26/22 at around 11:30 AM also revealed that R1 had a new walker delivered the next day, 04.03/21 as ordered by the family member. (continued on LIC 9099-C) UnsubstantiaCDSS inspection report, April 13, 2022 · control 31-AS-20210510084331
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was overheated. Resident was dehydrated. Facility did not have hot water for a week.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Abeye Duguma conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to the facility. Upon entry, LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Johnny Ortiz, and explained the reason for the visit. --- Resident was overheated. It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was in her room with the door shut, and the heater was on full blast. To investigate this allegation, on 03/11/2022 at 9:40 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs), Abeye Duguma and Gary Tan, conducted a physical plant tour and interviewed staff between 10:15 AM – 11:40 AM. Interviews and observations revealed that the facility staff do not adjust the room’s temperature higher than seventy-eight degrees (78º). (CONT. on LIC 9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 6, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220310153449
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is malodorous Residents room was dirty
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Resident Care Director Venca Avivi and informed the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 10:00 AM, requested facility records relevant to the investigation at 11:00 AM and conducted interview with staff and residents between 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that the facility is malorodorous, it was alleged that the hallway of the Life Guidance (Memory Care) Unit of the facility reeked of urine. LPA toured all three (3) floors of the Memory Care unit and did not observe any stink and/or bad smell along the hallways and common rooms of the building. (continued on LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 26, 2022 · control 31-AS-20210510084331
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff locked residents in their rooms. Residents door is in disrepair.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Abeye Duguma and Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to obtain additional information for the above noted allegations. LPA met with Johnny Ortiz, Executive Director (ED) and discussed the reason for the visit. ---Staff locked residents in their rooms. It was reported that the resident is being locked in the room. To investigate these allegations, on 03/11/2022 at 2:00pm LPAs conducted a physical plant tour. During the tour, LPAs selected random rooms to inspect and discovered that the rooms may only be locked from the inside. LPAs' interview facility staff between 12:30pm-2:30pm revealed that no one locked any resident inside their rooms at any time. Based on the information gathered during this and prior investigations, the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. (CONT on LIC9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 11, 2022 · control 31-AS-20200309111042
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Abeye Duguma conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to the facility. Upon entry, LPA was screened for COVID 19 and met with Executive Director (ED) Johnny Ortiz. --Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings It was reported that Resident #1’s (R1) dentures were misplaced/lost and the facility staff felt that they should not be held responsible. During the investigation conducted on 01/24/2022 at 10:30am, LPA interviewed the reporting party. On 02/08/2022 at 11:00am, LPA requested facility records and interviewed the Executive Director (ED). LPA conducted a record review and discovered that the personal belonging in question was not listed on the Client/Resident Personal Property and Valuables Inventory Form which was signed and dated by R1’s responsible party. Based on interviews and record review, there is no relevant information to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. UnsubstantiateCDSS inspection report, February 22, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220121083121
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident is left in room all day Facility did not provide resident with a 60day notice of rent increase for COVID expenses Resident's closet door is in disrepair
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Abeye Duguma conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to the facility. Upon entry, LPA was screened for COVID 19 and met with Executive Director (ED) Johnny Ortiz. --Resident is left in room all day. It was reported that Resident #1's (R1) resident is left in the room all day. To investigate this allegation, on 01/24/2022 at 10:30am LPA spoke to facility staff and residents. During the investigation conducted on 01/24/2022 at 11:00am, LPA randomly selected residents to inspect and a few of the residents were eating in isolation due to a recent COVID-19 outbreak by choice. LPA observed the residents' freewill to move about but were encouraged to social distance and avoid physical contact. Staff stated that they try to encourage R1 to participate in activities and walking but cannot force R1 to do so. Based on interviews, inspection and observation, there is no relevant information to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTCDSS inspection report, February 8, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220121083121
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not meet resident's hygiene needs Staff did not provide adequate laundry service for resident Resident's room is dirty Staff are not properly dressing resident Staff did not provide resident with adequate amounts of water
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Abeye Duguma conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to the facility. Upon entry, LPA was screened for COVID 19 and met with Executive Director (ED) Johnny Ortiz. --Staff did not meet resident's hygiene needs. It was reported that Resident #1's (R1) toenails were overgrown, and no one called responsible party to inform. To investigate these allegations, on 01/24/2022 at 10:30am LPA spoke to facility staff and responsible party. Interviews revealed that the facility is not allowed to cut R1's toenails, that the responsible party was made aware of R1's needs and given multiple options, but responsible party failed to act timely resulting in R1's overgrown toenails. During the investigation conducted on 01/24/2022 at 11:00am, LPA randomly selected residents to inspect and all residents appeared to be well groomed. Based on interviews, inspection and observation, there is no relevant information to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegatiCDSS inspection report, February 2, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220121083121
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff hit resident
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
This is an amendment of the report generated on 08/19/21 to change the findings. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Johnny Ortiz and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 10:11 AM. LPA requested facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:30 AM and interviewed the Executive Director between 11:00 AM to 11:30 AM. LPA's interview with Staff #1 (S1) on 03/26/21 at 3:44 PM, revealed that on 03/10/21 at around 4:30 PM, S1 witnessed Staff #2 (S2) heavily slapping Resident #1 (R1) at the back to stop R1 because R1 was throwing a fit and throwing food while eating at the dining area of the memory care unit. LPA's interview with the Executive Director on 03/26/21 at 3:00 PM revealed that S2 was immediately suspended on the same day of the incident, eventually terminated on 03/16/2021 and did not workCDSS inspection report, January 29, 2022 · control 31-AS-20210318171317
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not report incident to resident's responsible party. Resident suffered from significant weight loss.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Abeye Duguma conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to the facility. Upon entry, LPA was screened for COVID 19 and met with Executive Director (ED) Johnny Ortiz. ----- Staff did not report incident to resident's responsible party. It was alleged that staff did not report incident to resident's responsible party. To investigate these allegations, on 10/26/2021 at 3:30pm, LPA spoke with staff and other parties. In addition, on 10/26/2021 at 4:10pm, LPA observed resident #1 (R1), requested R1’s facility files and researched prior incident reports. After careful review, it was determined that R1 did sustain a small injury, there were hazardous materials found in R1’s room, it was reported to staff, but an incident report was not filed, and the responsible party was not notified timely. Based on the information from interviews and records review, the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED at this time.CDSS inspection report, January 3, 2022 · control 31-AS-20211020154028

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 38 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
7
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
12
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
14
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
38
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(661) 254-9933
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Atria Santa Clarita? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.