Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Angie's Home CareLicense #197604691 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareAngie's Home CareLicense #197604691 · 16456 Los Alimos St, Granada Hills, CA · (818) 366-7906Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Los Angeles County/Granada Hills/Angie's Home Care
Map · 16456 Los Alimos St

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$4,150/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $3,400–$5,150 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (818) 366-7906

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

AH

Call Angie's Home Care

Granada Hills · Licensed for 4

(818) 366-7906

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 4 · Granada Hills

Angie's Home Care

16456 Los Alimos St, Granada Hills, CA 91344 · Licensed since 2003

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Angie's Home Care

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$4,150 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $3,400–$5,150 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Licensed for 4: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 4 residents
  • Dementia
  • Hospiceup to 4 residents

Not on file: bedridden approval.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
CLEARED FOR 4 NON-AMBULATORY CLIENTS AGES 60 AND ABOVE. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Angie's Home Care: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,150a month to start

Likely $3,400–$5,150

From 16 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,150likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,150likely $3,400–$5,150

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,400–$5,350
$4,150
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,000–$8,550
$6,650
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes16 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,000 to $7,500

$3,000$7,500

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

16 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,100–$6,550.

  • Alalik Care HomeGranada Hills · 0.7 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Grant Serenity of Granada HillsGranada Hills · 1.1 mi · Small home
    $7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Alaga HomesNorthridge · 1.2 mi · Small home
    $6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Balboa Senior LivingGranada Hills · 1.3 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Aurora Home for SeniorsGranada Hills · 1.5 mi · Small home
    $3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
  • Healthy Life Service FacilityNorth Hills · 1.9 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • California State Health GroupNorth Hills · 2.5 mi · Small home
    $3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Breath of SunshineNorth Hills · 3.2 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Breath of Sunshine PlusNorthridge · 3.5 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Breath of Sunshine HarmonyArleta · 3.8 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • A Paradise in the ValleyNorthridge · 4.0 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Agape Senior ResidenceChatsworth · 4.3 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Mom and Dads RetreatVan Nuys · 4.6 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • A Caring Touch Board and CareChatsworth · 4.7 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Lily of the ValleyNorthridge · 4.8 mi · Small home
    $3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Grant Serenity Homes of SF ValleyVan Nuys · 5.0 mi · Small home
    $7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

16456 Los Alimos St, Granada Hills, CA 91344Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Providence Holy Cross Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list2 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #197604691 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 7 of 14 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 3 “Unsubstantiated”.

20261 state visit · 1 document

Sep 30, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. LPA met with the administrator, Angela Heath and explained the reason for the visit. At approximately 10:00am, LPA took a tour of the physical plant. The facility is a two story building, licensed to serve residents 60 years and above. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detector were tested and are both functional. The fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen. Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures are maintained and functional. LPA found a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food properly stored. Knives were stored in a locked in a cabinet. Bedrooms: There are five (5) bedrooms of which three (3) are for the resident's use. Two (2) bedrooms are designated for staff use. The bedrooms, in use by residents were properly furnished with appropriate beddings and linens with sufficient lighting and closet space. Staff rooms are located on the first and second floors. Staff room on the first floor is locked. Stairs leading to the second floor to the other staff room, has a locked gate, preventing resident access. Bathrooms: There are three (3) bathrooms of which, two (2) are designated for residents' use. Both bathrooms were properly supplied and had functional fixtures, grab bars and non-skid mats. One (1) bathroom is designated for staff use. Hot water temperature was measured between 117 and 119 degrees Fahrenheit. Common Areas: These included the living room, television room, and dining area. The living room and television rooms were properly furnished with enough seating of couches tables and chairs. There is a fireplace in both the living room and television room that are both non-functional. The fireplace is properly screened. The dining room has a table large enough to seat the four residents. The auditory alarms on all exit doors were on and functional at the time of the visit. Furniture was observed in good repair. Floors were mopped and clean. Passageways were clear of obstruction. Surrounding Grounds: Back and front yards were free of any hazards. There was furniture appropriate for outdoor use. No swimming pool or any other bodies of water. Side gates checked to insure compliance with fire clearance and no locks in place. The garage: Garage is attached to the home. Garage is used to store cleaning supplies, detergents and softeners. It is kept locked and inaccessible to residents. Laundry: Laundry area is in the garage. Resident Files: LPA conducted a file review of resident records to insure compliance of licensing forms. Staff Files: LPA also conducted a file review of staff records to insure forms to insure compliance. Medications: Medications are stored locked in a hallway closet. Medication and Medication Records were reviewed for proper storage and documentation. Medication closet is also supplied with a complete first aid kit and manual. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, there were no deficiencies observed during the visit. Exit Interview Conducted and a Copy of the Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 30, 2026

20253 state visits · 4 documents

Dec 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Residents physically abused by Staff. Facility Staff did not keep Residents free from punishment, abuse, punitive actions. Facility did not accord residents with safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations. Licensee allowed Staff and other non-employees to be present without Criminal Record Clearances. Facility operated over capacity. Facility Staff did not ensure food served was of the quality necessary to meet the needs of the residents. Facility Staff did not provide managed incontinence care necessary to meet resident’s needs. Facility Licensee made false/misleading statements to Resident family member(s) when reporting an incident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility to conclude the investigation regarding the above allegations. The initial visit to this investigation was made by LPA Cava on April 24, 2025. The complaint was then referred to Investigations Branch (IB) and accepted as an assignment to conduct interviews by IB Investigator, Douglas Real for three of the allegations pertaining to personal rights. LPA Cava investigated the remaining five allegations. Today, LPA met with the administrator, Angela Heath, and advised her of the complaint. Also, today's investigation consisted of interviews with residents and staff. A physical plant inspection was also made to insure facility compliance with regulation. Residents physically abused by Staff/Facility Staff did not keep Residents free from punishment, abuse, punitive actions/Facility did not accord residents with safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations: In regards to the three allegations, it’s being reported that the Licensee’s family member, an Uncleared Unsubstantiated Adult, threw Resident 1 (R1) to the ground, causing R1 to sustain a black eye. On another occasion, it was reported that this same family member pinched either Resident 2 (R2) or Resident 3 (R3), causing both residents to bleed. It was also reported that residents were forced to bathe and shower in cold water. There were no times, dates or any witnesses identified to corroborate these allegations. Investigation to these allegations are as follows · On April 24, 2025, LPA Cava made a ten day visit to conduct the Health and Safety check. Interview with the administrator between 12:50pm to 1:50pm reveal that there are only four (4) residents living in the home at this time. Administrator states only her and her husband/Staff 1 (S1) are live in staff. Administrator also confirm a family member resides in the home. Review of the facility Personnel Summary via the Licensing Information System (LIS) reveal that all three individuals, including hired staff, Staff 2 (S2), have fingerprint clearance, and are all associated. Additional interviews held with the four (4) of four residents held between 1:50pm to 2:50pm confirm that their needs are met. · On April 25, 2025, this complaint was referred to IB and accepted as an assignment. · On May 14, 2025, IB Investigators Douglas Real and Michele Salant conducted their investigation at the facility and conducted interviews with Administrator, residents and hospice personnel between 1:00pm to 2:00pm · The administrator denied any physical abuse, corporal punishment of facility residents or not providing safe and healthful environment to the residents. These residents reveal their needs are met and express no concerns with staff regarding physical abuse and/or corporal punishment. A hospice nurse who was present at the facility during the day of their investigation expressed no concerns of any personal rights violation, nor received any reports from the residents concerning facility staff. · On September 11, 2025, LPA Cava conducted another complaint (control # 31-AS-20250820130352), with similar allegations of personal rights. LPA interviewed the administrator and one (1) of one staff member, Staff 2 (S2), who both deny these allegations. Interviews with three (3) of three residents also deny any personal rights violation, stating staff are respectful, polite and attentive to their needs. · On December 5, 2025, between 8:30am to 10:30am, additional interviews were made with the Administrator and one (1) of one staff. Between 10:30am and 12:00pm, interviews with four (4) of four residents remain consistent with questions asked by LPA Cava on September 11, 2025. Based on the information obtained, there was insufficient evidence to corroborate the Personal Rights allegation. Therefore, investigation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Licensee allowed Staff and other non-employees to be present without Criminal Record Clearances. In regard to this allegation, it was reported that there is a staff member and another individual, who is not an employe, present at the facility without a criminal record clearance. The individual who is not an employee is identified as the Licensee’s family member. Investigation to this allegation is as follows: · On April 23, 2025, LPA Cava reviewed and printed out the facility personnel report summary. · On April 24, 2025, LPA made a ten-day visit. Interviews with both the administrator and Staff 1 (S1) confirm there are two live-in staff working in the facility. Both confirm that their family members live in the home. A review of the facility personnel summary report per Licensing Information System (LIS) confirmed all three individuals, including Staff 2 (S2), have fingerprint clearance, and association to this facility. · On this December 4, 2025, LPA confirmed that the administrator, S1, S2 and the administrator's family are still involved in facility operation, and are still all associated to the facility. Based on the information obtained, it could not be proven that there is a staff on a non-employee present at the facility without a Criminal Record Clearance. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Facility operated over capacity In regard to this allegation, it was reported that the facility is providing care and supervision to six (6) residents, when it is only licensed for a capacity of four (4). The additional two residents would be hidden in the closet or staff room when the Licensing Agency were to show. Investigation into this allegation is as follows: · On April 24, 2025, LPA made a ten day visit to conduct the Health and Safety check. Interview with the administrator reveal there are only four (4) residents living in the home at this time. LPA conducted a physical inspection to ensure compliance with regulation. The facility is a two story building, with five (5) bedrooms. Three (3) bedrooms are designated for residents. Two of these rooms are private, and one is shared. There is one staff room, occupied by the licensee’s family member on the first floor, and one staff room on the second floor, occupied by the administrator. Closets were checked in all rooms. Closet spaces were observed to be small to hide any person. · On September 11, 2025, in conjunction to a complaint (control # 31-AS-20250820130352), with a similar allegation, LPA Cava also conducted a required annual visit. A physical plant inspection on that date remains the same as what was observed on April 24, 2025. · On December 5, 2025, between 12:00pm and 1:00pm, LPA conducted another physical plant inspection. Both the first and second stories of the building were checked. All five bedrooms, three bathrooms and common areas checked. LPA did not observe a licensee providing care and supervision over their capacity. Based on the information obtained, it could not be proven that the facility is operating over capacity. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Facility Staff did not ensure food served was of the quality necessary to meet the needs of the residents In regard to the allegation, it was reported that residents are being served expired food. There were no witnesses identified to corroborate this allegation. Investigation into this allegation is as follows: · On April 24, 2025, LPA made a ten-day visit to conduct the Health and Safety check. Inspection of the facility kitchen/food service area was inconsistent to the allegation, as no expired foods were observed. Perishable food items in the refrigerator were observed to be freshly dated and sealed. Non-perishable/Canned foods were stocked and maintained in the pantry. Interviews with four (4) of four residents had no concerns with food service at the time. · On September 11, 2025, in conjunction to a complaint (control # 31-AS-20250820130352), with a similar allegation, LPA Cava also conducted a required annual. A physical plant inspection of the facility kitchen and food service area on that date remains the same as what was observed on April 24, 2025. · On this date December 5, 2025, between 12:00pm and 1:00pm, LPA conducted another physical plant inspection and observed the facility kitchen/food service area. LPA observed perishable food refrigerated, properly sealed and labeled. Non-perishable foods were sealed and to date. Nothing was observed spoiled or expired during the visit. Observation of food revealed nothing was exposed to contamination. Based on the information obtained, it could not be proven that staff did not ensure food served was of the quality necessary to meet the needs of the residents. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Facility Staff did not provide managed incontinence care necessary to meet resident’s needs: In regard to the allegation it was reported that residents are not taken to the bathroom when needed, and if they would urinate on themselves, administrator and staff would yell at them. There were no witnesses identified to corroborate with this allegation. Investigation is as follows: · On April 24, 2025, LPA made a ten day visit to conduct the Health and Safety check. Interviews with four (4) of four residents at the time do not corroborate with the allegation. These residents expressed their needs to be met, and had no complaints regarding their care and supervision. · On May 14, 2025, IB Investigators Real and Michele Salant conducted interviews with four (4) of four residents. These residents deny the allegation and confirm that their needs are being met. Investigators also interviewed a hospice nurse who was present. The hospice nurse stated no complaints of neglect reported to them by the residents. · On December 5, 2025, between 10:30am and 12:00pm, another interview was held with four (4) of four residents. Interviews with these residents remain consistent with previous interviews, and confirm their needs are being met. Based on the information obtained, it could not be proven that staff did not provide incontinent care necessary to meet resident's needs. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Facility Licensee made false/misleading statements to Resident family member(s) when reporting an incident In regard to this allegation, R1 sustained a black eye due to a personal rights violation from staff. It was reported to R1’s family that the black eye was caused by a fall. There were no witnesses to corroborate the personal rights violation. R1’s family also could not confirm the incident to R1. Investigation is as follows: · On May 14, 2025, IB Investigators Real and Michele Salant conducted interviews with four (4) of the four residents who deny allegations of personal rights. These residents reveal their needs are met and express no concerns with staff. Investigators also interviewed a hospice nurse who was present. The hospice nurse expressed no concerns about any personal rights violation, nor received any reports from the residents of their personal rights being violated. · On September 11, 2025, LPA Cava conducted another complaint (control # 31-AS-20250820130352), with similar allegations of personal rights. LPA interviewed the administrator and staff, who deny these allegations. Interviews with three (3) of three residents also deny any personal rights violation. · On December 5, 2025 between 8:30am and 10:30am, another interview was held with administrator and one (1) of one staff. Between 10:30am and 12:00pm, interviews with four (4) of four residents were interviewed. These interviews with the administrator, staff and the four residents remain consistent with questions asked by LPA Cava on September 11, 2025. Based on the information obtained, it could not be proven that the Licensee made false/misleading statements to Resident family member(s) when reporting an incident. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250423090219
Sep 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is physically abusing residents. Staff locked resident in closet. Staff is not providing medications as prescribed. Staff is serving expired foods. Staff is operating beyond the scope of license.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility to conclude the investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA met with the administrator, Angela Heath, and advised her of the allegations. Today's investigation consisted of interviews with the administrator and staff (from 9:15am-10:00am), interviews with residents (between 10:00am-11:00am), a physical plant inspection (between 11:00am-12:00pm) and medication review (between 12:00pm-1:00pm). In conjunction with this investigation LPA Cava also conducted a Required Annual inspection. Staff is physically abusing residents: In regards to the allegation, it's been reported that there is a continued abuse of the residents in care at the facility pertaining to Resident 1 (R1) being thrown to the ground. No witnesses were identified to corroborate this allegation. Interviews with the administrator, Staff 1 (S1) and Staff 2 (S2) deny the allegation. Unsubstantiated Interviews with three (3) of three residents also deny the allegation. Moreover, a complaint report was received with a similar allegation (control #31-AS-20250423090219). This allegation was given to Investigations Branch (IB) as an assignment to conduct interviews. IB investigator's interviews conducted with staff and residents proved inconsistent with the allegation of abuse. Based on the information obtained, there was insufficient evidence to prove that staff is physically abusing residents. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff locked resident in closet: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that Resident 2 (R2) was locked in a closet. No witnesses were identified to corroborate with this allegation. Interviews with the administrator, Staff 1 (S1) and Staff 2 (S2) deny the allegation. Interviews with three (3) of three residents could not confirm this allegation. Moreover, a complaint report was received with a similar allegation (control #31-AS-20250423090219). This allegation was given to Investigations Branch (IB) as an assignment to conduct interviews. IB investigator's interviews with staff and residents proved inconsistent with the allegation of abuse. Based on the information obtained, there was insufficient evidence to prove that staff locked residents in a closet. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff is not providing medications as prescribed: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that staff is withholding resident medications. Residents whose medications being withheld were not identified to this complaint. Interviews with the administrator, Staff 1 (S1) and Staff 2 (S2) deny the allegation. Interviews with three (3) of three residents could not confirm this allegation. In addition to interviews, LPA conducted a medication review for proper storage and documentation. No discrepancies observed with medication records during this review. Based on the information obtained, there was insufficient evidence to prove that staff is not providing medications as prescribed. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff is serving expired foods: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that residents are being fed food that is expired. Interviews with the administrator, Staff 1 (S1) and Staff 2 (S2) deny the allegation. Interviews with three (3) of three residents expressed no complaints or concerns regarding food service. In addition to interviews, LPA conducted a physical plant inspection of the facility kitchen and food storage. Per inspection, LPA did not observe any spoiled or expired food on stock. Based on the information obtained, it could not be proven that staff is serving expired food to residents. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff is operating beyond the scope of license: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that the facility is overcrowded, housing six (6) residents, when the license for capacity is four (4). Interviews with the administrator, Staff 1 (S1) and Staff 2 (S2) deny the allegation, stating they never exceed capacity. Interviews with three (3) of three residents also deny the allegation. In addition, LPA conducted a physical plant inspection to insure compliance with fire-clearance and census. The facility is a two story building. There are six (6) bedrooms of which four (4) are for the resident's use. Two (2) bedrooms are designated for staff use. The second floor is designated for the licensee only. No resident access. LPA checked all six rooms, and inside closet space. LPA also inspected the second story of the building. During this inspection, LPA did not observe the facility exceeding its' capacity of four residents. Based on interviews and the physical plant inspection, it could not be proven that facility is operating beyond the scope of the license. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 11, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250820130352
Sep 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

In conjunction with complaint control #31-AS-20250820130352, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. LPA met with the administrator, Angela Heath and explained the reason for the visit. At approximately 8:45am, with the assistance of the administrator, LPA took a tour of the physical plant. The facility is a two story building, licensed to serve residents 60 years and above. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detector were tested and are both functional. The fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen. It was last charged April 24, 2024. Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures are maintained and functional. LPA found a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; properly stored. Knives were stored in a locked in a cabinet. Bedrooms: There are five (5) bedrooms of which three (3) are for the resident's use. Two (2) bedrooms are designated for staff use. The bedrooms, in use by residents were properly furnished with appropriate beddings and linens with sufficient lighting. Staff rooms are located on the first and second floors. Staff room on the first floor is locked. Stairs leading to the second floor to the other staff room, has a locked gate, preventing resident access. Bathrooms: There are three (3) bathrooms of which, two (2) are designated for residents' use. Both bathrooms were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. One (1) bathroom is designated for staff use. Hot water temperature was measured between 111 and 113 degrees Fahrenheit. Common Areas: These included the living room, television room, and dining area. The living room and television rooms were properly furnished with enough seating. There is a fireplace in both the living room and television room that are both non-functional, but properly screened. The dining room has a table large enough to seat the four residents. The auditory alarms on all exit doors were on and functional at the time of the visit. Furniture was observed in good repair. Floors were mopped and clean. Passageways were clear of obstruction. Surrounding Grounds: Back and front yards were free of any hazards. There was furniture appropriate for outdoor use. No swimming pool or any other bodies of water. Side gates checked to insure compliance with fire clearance and no locks in place. The garage: Garage is attached to the home. Garage is used to store cleaning supplies, detergents and softeners. It is kept locked and inaccessible to residents. Laundry: Laundry area is in the garage. Resident Files: LPA conducted a file review of resident records to insure compliance of licensing forms. Staff Files: LPA also conducted a file review of staff records to insure forms and training are up to date and compliance with licensing forms. Medications: Medications are stored locked in a hallway closet. Medication and Medication Records were reviewed for proper storage and documentation. Medication closet is also supplied with a complete first aid kit and manual. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, there were no deficiencies observed during the visit. Exit Interview Conducted and a Copy of the Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 11, 2025
May 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are administering expired medications to residents Staff do not treat resident(s) with dignity and respect.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit ot the facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with the administrator, Angela Heath, and advised her of the complaint. Today's investigation consisted of interviews with the administrator, staff and residents. LPA also conducted a physical plant inspection and record review. Staff are administering expired medications to residents: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that residents are being given expired medication. Report did not indicate what expired medicine was being administered, only that it was medications for the heart, diabetes and for Alzheimer's. Report also did not identify the residents expired medication was given to, staff assisting with the medicine, witnesses, and dates of when this expired medication was administered. Interview with the administrator and two (2) of two staff deny the allegation of assisting and giving the residents expired medicine. For refills, administrator stated the resident families are in charge. Family Unsubstantiated would call for the refill prescription, and deliver the resident medication to the facility themselves. LPA interviewed four (4) of four residents. Interviews with these four residents do not corroborate with the allegation of them being given expired medicine. In addition to interviews, LPA reviewed the facility medications and medication records for storage and documentation. Per review, LPA did not observe any expired medications kept, stored or recorded on file. Administrator stated medications that has expired have either been returned to the family or pharmacy for disposal. Based on the information obtained, there wasn't enough evidence to prove that staff are administering expired medications to the residents. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff do not treat resident(s) with dignity and respect: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that garbage bags are placed around residents. It was also reported that licensee does not provide a clean and safe environment, only cleaning when the licensing agency shows up to the facility. Interview with the administrator and two (2) of two staff deny the allegation of garbage bags being left all around the residents, and not providing residents with a clean and safe environment. Interviews with four (4) of four residents have no complaints or concerns of staff not treating them with dignity and respect, staff leaving garbage bags all around them, or not providing them a clean and safe environment. All residents stated they are happy with the care and supervision provided to them, and that all their needs are met. In addition to interviews, LPA conducted a physical plant inspection of the facility to insure compliance with regulation. Per LPA's observation during the physical plant inspection, the facility was clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair. Based on the information obtained, there wasn't enough evidence to prove that staff do not treat the residents with dignity and respect. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250508110214

20242 state visits · 2 documents

Dec 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. LPA met with the administrator, Angela Heath and explained the reason for the visit. At approximately 8:45am, with the assistance of staff, LPA took a tour of the physical plant. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The facility is a one story building. The smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detector are connected and functional. The fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen. It was last charged April 24, 2024. Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. LPA found a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; properly stored. Knives were stored in a locked. Bedrooms: There are six (6) bedrooms of which four (4) are for the resident's use. Two (2) bedrooms are designated for staff use. The bedrooms, in use by residents were properly furnished with appropriate beddings and linens with sufficient lighting. Staff rooms are locked. No medications are observed in the staff room. Bathrooms: There are three (3) bathrooms of which, two (2) are designated for residents' use. Both bathrooms were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. One (1) bathroom is designated for staff use. Hot water temperature was measured between 115 and 120 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA did not observe any cleaning supplies in the resident bathrooms during the day of the annual. Common Areas: These included the living room and dining area. The living room has two couches and up to four additional seating. There is a fireplace, that is non-functional. The dining room has a table large enough to seat the four residents. The auditory alarms on all exit doors were on and functional at the time of the visit. Furniture was observed in good repair. Floors were mopped and clean. Passageways were clear of obstruction. Surrounding Grounds: Back and front yards were free of any hazards. There was furniture appropriate for outdoor use. The garage: Garage is attached to the home but locked and inaccessible to residents. It is also being used as the laundry area. Laundry detergents, cleaning solutions and other toxins are stored in the garage. Resident Files: LPA conducted a file review of resident records to insure compliance of licensing forms. Staff Files: LPA also conducted a file review of staff records to insure forms and training are up to date and compliance with licensing forms. Medications: Medications are stored locked in a hallway closet. Medication and Medication Records were reviewed for proper storage and documentation. First aid kit is equipped with necessary tools and supplies. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, there were no deficiencies observed during the visit. Exit Interview Conducted and a Copy of the Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 14, 2024
Jan 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. LPA met with the administrator, Angela Heath and explained the reason for the visit. At approximately 8:45am, with the assistance of staff, LPA took a tour of the physical plant. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detector are connected and functional. The fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen. The charge date is 06/20/2023. Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. LPA found a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; properly stored. Knives were stored in a locked. Bedrooms: There are six (6) bedrooms of which four (4) are for the resident's use. Two (2) bedrooms are designated for staff use. The bedrooms, in use by residents were properly furnished with appropriate beddings and linens with sufficient lighting. Staff rooms are locked. No medications are observed in the staff room. Bathrooms: There are three (3) bathrooms of which, two (2) are designated for residents' use. Both bathrooms were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. One (1) bathroom is designated for staff use. Hot water temperature was measured at 112 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA did not observe any cleaning supplies in the resident bathrooms during the day of the annual. Common Areas: These included the living room and dining area. The common areas were properly furnished. The auditory alarms on all exit doors were on and functional at the time of the visit. Walls, windows, ceilings, floors, and doors were observed clean and maintained. Surrounding Grounds: Entry/exits were free of obstruction. There was furniture appropriate for outdoor use. The outdoor area was free of hazards. The garage: Garage is attached to the home but locked and inaccessible to residents. It is also being used as the laundry area. Laundry detergents, cleaning solutions and other toxins are stored in the garage. Resident Files: LPA conducted a file review of resident records to insure compliance of licensing forms. Staff Files: LPA also conducted a file review of staff records to insure forms and training are up to date and compliance with licensing forms. Medications: Medication and Medication Records were review for proper storage and documentation. Medications are stored in the hallway, locked and inaccessible to residents. First aid kit is equipped with necessary tools and supplies. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, there were no deficiencies observed during the visit. Exit Interview Conducted and a Copy of the Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 17, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2022 · 7 documents

20223 state visits · 4 documents

Sep 6, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not following Covid-19 protocols Staff are not safeguarding cleaning materials from residents while in care Staff did not ensure that sharp objects are inaccessible to residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Patrick Shanahan arrived at the facility in response to the above mentioned allegations. LPA was greeted by the facility administrator and explained the reason for the visit. Allegation 1. Staff are not following Covid-19 protocols LPA arrived at the home at about 9:00 AM, to conduct an infection control annual. All staff were observed to be wearing masks and all Covid-19 protocols were being followed. The LPA brought up the allegation of this complaint to the administrator at about 11:00 AM and the administrator confirmed that last month the ombudsman had visited the facility. During that visit, the staff were observed to not be wearing masks and the protocols were not properly followed. The administrator stated that all protocols are now followed and an in-service was held for all staff as a reminder. Based on confirmation from the administrator, this allegation is deemed to be substantiated at this time. Continues on LIC 9099-C Substantiated Allegation 2. Staff did not ensure that sharp objects are inaccessible to residents The LPA was able to tour the kitchen at about 10:00 AM. All knives were observed to be locked in drawers and all chemicals were observed to be locked in the garage. The administrator confirmed that she had the keys on her person and were not observed in drawers or accessible to residents. At 11:00 AM, the administrator was asked about this allegation and confirmed that last month when the ombudsman visited the home, the keys to the sharps drawer were hanging from the drawer. The administrator stated that she had been in the kitchen and had been coming in and out. The administrator confirmed that after that visit, she has kept the keys on her and does not leave them hanging from the lock. Based on confirmation from the administrator, this allegation is deemed substantiated. Allegation 3. Staff are not safeguarding cleaning materials from residents while in care The LPA was able to tour the kitchen at about 10:00 AM. LPA did not observe any chemicals on the counter, under the sink or accessible to residents in care. At about 11:00 AM, the LPA asked the administrator about this allegation and confirmed that last month during the ombudsman visit, chemicals were left accessible. The administrator stated that she was in the kitchen and was coming in and out, but she had left the kitchen unattended and the chemicals were accessible for a brief amount of time. The LPA toured the rest of the facility at about 10:00 AM and no chemicals or cleaning materials were observed in any of the common areas or in any of the restrooms. Based on confirmation from the administrator this allegation is deemed substantiated. Exit Interview conducted, deficiencies cited and report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 6, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220901125225

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 87309(a) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 6, 2022

Storage Space 87309(a)- Disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisons, firearms and other items which could pose a danger if readily available to clients shall be stored where inaccessible to clients. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, Administrator did not ensure cleaning solutions and sharps remain inaccessible tou residents in care.. This poses an immediate health and safety risk or personal rights to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 6, 2022

Plan of correction: Cleared before visit. Administrator held an in-service and were observed wearing masks during todays visit. Administrator agrees to put in writing her hunderstanding of this regulation

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 6, 2022

Personal Rights 87468.1(a)(2) -To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on administrator confirmation, staff and Administrator were not wearing surgical masks. Administrator did not screen for infection control. This poses an immediate health and safety risk or personal rights to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 6, 2022

Plan of correction: Cleared before visit. Administrator held an inservice and was observed wearing masks during todays visit. Administrator agrees to put in writing her hunderstanding of this regulation

Sep 6, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Patrick Shanahan, arrived at the facility in order to conduct an infection control annual. LPA was greeted by the facility administrator and all covid 19 protocols were followed before being allowed entry into the facility. The LPA used the infection control tool to complete the annual. The LPA was also able to briefly tour the home. LPA tested the smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors and they functioned properly. The fire extinguisher was observed in the kitchen to be functional. The facility is currently following their infection control policy and no deficiencies were observed during today's visit. Exit interview conducted and report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 6, 2022
Feb 9, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not following Covid-19 protocols Staff are not safeguarding cleaning materials from residents while in care

At 10:00 A.M Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Joscelyn Martinez and Melissa Ruiz made an unannounced visit to conduct a complaint investigation. Upon arrival, LPAs were greeted by the Administrator. Allegation #1 Staff are not following Covid-19 protocols. Upon entrance, LPAs observed staff and Administrator not wearing a surgical mask. LPAs had to remind staff and Administrator to wear a mask at all times. Additionally, LPAs were not properly screened for infection control protocols upon arrival. Based on LPA’s observation this allegation is substantiated at this time. Allegation #2 Staff are not safeguarding cleaning materials from residents while in care. Substantiated At 10:05 LPAs conducted a facility tour. Upon touring the kitchen, LPAs observed Clorox cleaning solutions under the sink that were accessible to residents in care. At 10:15 LPAs interviewed the Administrator and the Administrator stated that about a month ago, Ombudsman had conducted a visit and had saw a cleaning solution on the kitchen table, which was accessible to residents. Based on LPA’s observation and interview conducted this allegation is substantiated at this time. During the end of the facility tour, LPAs also observed sharps in a unlock drawer which were accessible to residents. Administrator stated she always carries the keys, however LPAs reminder the Administrator that knives always have to be locked. Since Administrator was not available to sign the report, Administrator designated staff to sign. Deficiencies were issued per CA code of Regulations Title 22. See 9099D's included with this report. Appeal rights issued. Report delivered. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 9, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220207122630

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 11, 2022

Personal Rights 87468.1(a)(2) -To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPAs observations, staff and Administrator were not wearing surgical masks. Administrator did not screen for infection control. This poses an immediate health and safety risk or personal rights to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 9, 2022

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to train all staff on Mitigation Plan and Infection Control which includes screening and usage of masks. Staff sign-in sheet and training materials shall be e-mailed to LPA by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87309(a) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 11, 2022

Storage Space 87309(a)- Disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisons, firearms and other items which could pose a danger if readily available to clients shall be stored where inaccessible to clients. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations and interview, Administrator did not ensure cleaning solutions and sharps remain inaccessible tou residents in care. LPAs observed a cleaning agent and shaprs accessible. This poses an immediate health and safety risk or personal rights to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 9, 2022

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to train all staff on ensuring cleaning solutions and shaprs remain inaccessible to residents at all times. Staff sign-in sheet and training materials shall be e-mailed to LPA by POC due date.

Jan 29, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted an unannounced case management visit to this facility to issue a deficiency in connection with complaint control no.: 31-AS-20200911123028 wherein the facility retained Resident #1 (R1) on 07/16/20 to 08/14/20 with stage 3 pressure sore injury without hospice or home health services. Citation issued. Appeal rights discussed and given. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 29, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87615(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 31, 2022

Prohibited Health Condition (a) Persons who require health services for or have a health condition including, but not limited to, those specified below, shall not be admitted or retained in a residential care facility for the elderly: (1) Stage 3 and 4 pressure injuries. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA's record review, the licensee did not ensure that R1 was not retained with a Stage 3 or 4 pressure injury and received proper treatment of the pressure injury. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 29, 2022

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to review regulations related to prohibited and restricted health conditions and send a written statement of understanding to CCL. Administrator and staff will complete a training on pressure injuries and proof of training will be sent to CCL on or before the POC date

20212 state visits · 3 documents

Sep 29, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee handles resident in a rough manner

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegation. LPA met with administrator Angela Heath and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 11:35 AM, requested and reviewed facility records at 11:55 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:55 AM to 1:00 PM. LPA's interview with residents between 11:55 AM to 1:00 PM, revealed that they were not handled roughly by any staff and did not witness any staff mis treating, disrespecting or roughly handling any resident. Administrator and staff denied they handled they roughly handled Resident #1 (R1) or any resident at the facility during LPA's interview between 11:55 AM to 1:00 PM. LPA attempted to call the R1's power of attorney (POA) multiple times to no avail. Based on the information gathered during this and prior visit, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 29, 2021 · control 31-AS-20200901145741
Sep 29, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained a pressure wound while in care Resident is malnourished while in care Staff are not following physician's orders as required Staff failed to address resident's incontinence needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to the facility to deliver the findings for the above allegation. LPA met with the administrator Angie Heath and explained the purpose of this visit. Entrance interview conducted. On 09/11/2020, a complaint was received by the Woodland Hills Adult and Senior Care Regional Office. The complaint was referred to and accepted by Community Care Licensing Division’s Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to IB investigator Jose Santana. On 09/14/2020 at 9:11 AM, LPA Tan initiated the complaint visit. LPA Tan interviewed the administrator and obtained copies of the facility records relevant to the investigation. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) During the course of subsequent investigation, Investigator Santana interviewed the administrator and resident #1 (R1) on 11/04/2020. Resident #1 (R1)’s Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA) and R1 on 09/16/2020 & 09/17/2020 and 11/05/2020, Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) officer on 09/22/2020 and 11/05/2020, Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) on 11/02/2020, Reporting Party (RP) on 11/04/2020 and Hospice Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) on 11/04/2020. Investigator Santana also subpoenaed Wound Care, Hospice and Hospital records on 09/18/2020 and received on 09/25/2020 and 09/28/2020 in digital format. Investigator Santana also attempted to obtain any record from the law enforcement regarding R1 on the incident but was informed that there was no investigation conducted and the case was closed. Regarding the allegation the resident sustained a pressure wound while in care, LPA record review on 09/14/2020, revealed that R1 was admitted at the facility on 03/15/2020 and for Hospice care services on 03/25/2020. R1 had hospice nurse’s and certified hospice home aide (CHHA) visit twice a week. On 06/23/2020, the visiting nurse observed that R1 had a sacral pressure injury that the nurse did not observe the prior week. The issue was elevated to the hospice doctor who recommended treatment immediately and increased the frequency of R1’s repositioning. On 07/10/2020, the hospice agency requested a wound consult to the wound care clinic. On 07/14/2020, the wound significantly decreased in size. On 07/16/2020 however, the family member who is also the Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA) of R1 had revoked the services of the hospice agency as R1 had to receive aggressive treatment for R1’s infection in the acute hospital. R1 was again resumed hospice services due to increased weakness, poor appetite, and pressure injury on 08/11/2020 and immediately requested another wound consult the day after (08/12/2020). The Hospice agency continued to treat the wound of R1 until the initial visit of the Wound Care specialist on 08/20/20 who assumed wound treatment of R1. (continued to LIC 9099-C) (continued from LIC 9099-C) Regarding the allegation that the resident was malnourished while in care, LPA medical record review revealed that R1 visited hospital clinic on 04/20/2020 and stated that R1 did not have any weight loss. R1 had also visited hospital clinic on 07/15/2020, 07/16/2020, 07/17/2020, 07/20/2020 and 07/24/2020 with multiple doctors including an Internist and there was no observation on record that R1 was malnourished. On 08/05/2020, R1’s visit at the medical center was observed to be negative for weight loss. Moreover, Investigator Santana’s interview with R1’s MPOA revealed that R1 sometime refused to eat lunch but MPOA persuaded R1 not to refuse any meal which R1 agreed. Regarding the allegation of staff are not following physician’s order as required, Investigator Santana’s interview with R1’s MPOA revealed that the MPOA was told by the administrator and was aware of the doctor’s order to procure low air loss mattress for R1 and eventually procured it. Investigator Santana’s interview with R1 also revealed that R1 was aware that the administrator told R1’s MPOA to buy the required mattress but due to MPOA’s oversight, was not immediately purchased but now R1 is using it. Regarding the allegation that the staff failed to address resident’s incontinence needs, Investigator Santana’s interview with R1 revealed that caregivers check on R1 at night regularly but sometime refused to wake R1 when R1 is sound asleep. R1 also refused to call caregiver at times during nighttime. Investigator Santana’s interview with MPOA also revealed that MPOA knew that R1 is being changed and turned every two (2) hours as R1 would have told MPOA if they did not. Based on information gathered during the course of the investigation, the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time Exit interview conducted and report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 29, 2021 · control 31-AS-20200911123028
Jul 7, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan met with administrator Angie Heath for a One (1) Year Required - Infection Control visit for this facility. LPA explained the reason for the visit. A tour of the physical plant was conducted at 1:05 PM and the following was noted: There is only one entrance being utilized at the facility and there are required poster posted at the main door. Screening area is located immediately upon entrance. Sign in sheet, hand sanitizer, gloves and masks are available. LPAs were screened upon entry. All staff were observed to be wearing mask upon entrance and during visit. The facility had submitted and approved Mitigation plan. Signs to wear a mask and other Covid 19 prevention protocol signs were posted outside the doors. Hand washing, coughing etiquette, physical distancing and other necessary signs were posted in the bathroom and all over the facility. The facility has a designated visitors' area at the front and backyard. The facility has sufficient stock of PPE in the storage room. The facility has six (6) bedrooms and three (3) bathrooms currently occupying four (4) residents. Two (2) bedrooms and one (1) bathroom is designated for staff use. The facility is fire cleared for four (4) non-ambulatory residents and has hospice waiver for four (4) residents. (continued on LIC 809) (continued from LIC 809) Physical environment was checked for cleanliness and condition. Walls, windows, ceilings, floors and floor coverings, and doors were checked, the following was noted: Living and dining room furniture were also checked. The living room is neat and clean along with the family room. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 78°F. The smoke and carbon monoxide detector were tested and observed to be operational. The fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen and was last inspected on 05/07/21. The backyard of the facility has outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for clients. There is no body of water at the facility. There is a storage facility in the backyard but was locked and inaccessible to client. The garage is attached to the home but locked and inaccessible to residents. It is also being used as the laundry area. Laundry detergents, cleaning solutions and other toxins are stored in the garage. Food Service/Kitchen area was sufficiently stocked with two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non-perishable food. Frozen foods are properly wrapped and stored appropriately. Food storage and preparation areas are clean and inaccessible to pests. The Clients' rooms are adequately furnished with appropriate furniture and lighting system. All clients' room appeared to be clean and in good repair. Staff Rooms: Staff rooms are locked. No medications are observed in the staff room. The bathrooms were checked for cleanliness and proper operation. LPA observed the appropriate grab bars for each toilet, bathtub and shower. The hot water temperature measured at 116.2°F. There is enough clean linen available in stock at the linen cabinet. Medications: LPA observed medication in the hallway cabinet to be locked and inaccessible to residents. First aid kit is equipped with necessary tools and supplies. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2021

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

4 of 4 beds were occupied at the December 5, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Angie's Home Care, Inc., licensed since 2003.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2003, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
11
Total complaints
5
Substantiated allegations
5
Type A citations
3
Type B citations
1

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2003, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations30
Type B citations10
Substantiated allegations50
Total complaints50

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Angie's Home Care

Is Angie's Home Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Angie's Home Care licensed for?

4 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Angie's Home Care been cited?

3 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2003, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.

Is Angie's Home Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.

What does Angie's Home Care cost?

$4,150 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,400–$5,150. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 232 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,151 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 232 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Angie's Home Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Angie's Home Care, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Providence Holy Cross Medical Center is 2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Angie's Home Care keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Angie's Home Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ANGIE'S HOME CARE, INC.”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197604691. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 4 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Angie's Home Care, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2003, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 11 state inspection visits since 2003, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 3 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2003, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
  • 5 complaints and 5 substantiated allegations on file since 2003, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 30, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Granada Hills · 0.3 mi

    Alexandria Residential Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,650 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,800–$5,750

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Granada Hills · 0.3 mi

    A Kind Heart Senior Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,900 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,050–$6,050

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Granada Hills · 0.1 mi

    Adastra Adult Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,750 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,850–$5,800

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Granada Hills · 0.1 mi

    Kingsbury Street Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,650 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,800–$5,700

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Granada Hills · 0.2 mi

    We Care Board and Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,650 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,800–$5,750

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Granada Hills · 0.3 mi

    A-1 Ascended Senior Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,550 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,750–$5,650

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Los Angeles County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
AH

Call Angie's Home Care

Granada Hills · Licensed for 4

(818) 366-7906

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Angie's Home Care

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages