San Dimas Retirement Center is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Dimas, Los Angeles County, California — state license #191500609, licensed for 343 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 64 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 16, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

0 homes in view

San Dimas Retirement Center

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 343 residents · San Dimas, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #191500609, held since 1988 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
834 West Arrow Highway · San Dimas, Los Angeles County
Phone
(909) 599-8441
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 343 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
APPROVED CAPACITY FOR 343 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS AGES 60 AND ABOVE. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 30 RESIDENT(S). ALSO APPROVED FOR DEMENTIARESIDENTS.State service designation985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 79 times and filed 64 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated June 16, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 16, 2026
Occupancy at the October 6, 2025 visit
116 of 343 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 20 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 16, 2021 to October 6, 2025. 20 of the 20 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (9), “Unsubstantiated” (11). 20 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 20 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 38 of 64 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20265 state visits · 5 documents
Jun 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 8, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 1, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202513 state visits · 14 documents
Dec 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure resident was allowed to be readmitted to facility

*** this report supersedes report dated 6/17/25 reason is to include additional information. There are no changes to the findings, which remain unsubstantiated *** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted a subsequent visit to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Karen Meacham and discussed the purpose of today's visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained copies of staff/resident rosters, copies of R1's Discharge Summary dated 7/15/25 and R1's facesheet, LPA interviewed 4 staff (S1-S4) and 11 residents (R2-R12). R1 was not able to be interviewed as they are no longer a resident at the facility, LPA was able to interview R1's responsible party during visit via telephone call. (Continued on LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 6, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250613111812
Oct 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide resident transportation to medical appointments Staff tampered with residents’ mail Staff were harassing resident

*** this report supersedes report dated 6/17/25 reason is to include additional information. There are no changes to the findings, which remain unsubstantiated *** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted a subsequent visit to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Karen Meacham and discussed the purpose of today's visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained copies of staff/resident rosters, toured facilities mail area and inspected mail, reviewed facilites transportation log and obtained copies of the log from May-October 2025, interviewed 4 Staff (S1-S4) and 11 residents (R2-R12), R1 was not able to interviewed as they are no longer a resident at the facility and LPA was not able to reach R1 through several phone call attempts. (Continued on LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 6, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250220160903
Aug 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure resident was allowed to be readmitted to facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicol Wesley conducted a 10 day complaint visit at the facility and met with Administrator Priscilla Gaytan and discussed the purpose for todays visit. Investigation consisted of: staff roster, resident roster, residents discharge papers, ID page, physicians reports, interviewed staff #1, and requested specific documents from resident 1 files, attempted to interview resident #1. Investigation revealed: Regarding allegation:Staff did not ensure resident was allowed to be readmitted to facility. LPA Wesley spoke to the Administrator Priscilla Gaytan and she informed me that the facility did take the resident back, They are located in the memory care unit, LPA Wesley and the Administrator walked to the memory care unit and LPA greeted the resident and asked the name. They said they are resident 1. LPA Wesley spoke to staff 1 and she said there must have been a misunderstanding, they took the resident continued on LIC 9099C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250613111812
Jun 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202411 state visits · 11 documents
Dec 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20237 state visits · 8 documents
Dec 12, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 12, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 4, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 7, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 3, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 6, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 17, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations11typical 1
Type B citations17typical 1
Substantiated complaints30typical 2
Total complaints59typical 7
State visits on file79typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 1988.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20265502025131402024111102023151602022111442021675
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2022 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (909) 599-8441

Is San Dimas Retirement Center licensed?

Yes — San Dimas Retirement Center is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Dimas (Los Angeles County): California license #191500609, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 343 residents. State records list 64 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 16, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can San Dimas Retirement Center care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists San Dimas Retirement Center with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAPPROVED CAPACITY FOR 343 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS AGES 60 AND ABOVE. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 30 RESIDENT(S). ALSO APPROVED FOR DEMENTIARESIDENTS.

How much does San Dimas Retirement Center cost?

California's public licensing record does not include San Dimas Retirement Center's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does San Dimas Retirement Center accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at San Dimas Retirement Center through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Los Angeles County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

116 of 343 beds occupied (34%) when the state visited on October 6, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for San Dimas Retirement Center?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 79 state visits and 64 dated documents since 2021 for San Dimas Retirement Center; 20 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 6, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

20 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure resident was allowed to be readmitted to facility
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
*** this report supersedes report dated 6/17/25 reason is to include additional information. There are no changes to the findings, which remain unsubstantiated *** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted a subsequent visit to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Karen Meacham and discussed the purpose of today's visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained copies of staff/resident rosters, copies of R1's Discharge Summary dated 7/15/25 and R1's facesheet, LPA interviewed 4 staff (S1-S4) and 11 residents (R2-R12). R1 was not able to be interviewed as they are no longer a resident at the facility, LPA was able to interview R1's responsible party during visit via telephone call. (Continued on LIC9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 6, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250613111812
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide resident transportation to medical appointments Staff tampered with residents’ mail Staff were harassing resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
*** this report supersedes report dated 6/17/25 reason is to include additional information. There are no changes to the findings, which remain unsubstantiated *** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted a subsequent visit to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Karen Meacham and discussed the purpose of today's visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained copies of staff/resident rosters, toured facilities mail area and inspected mail, reviewed facilites transportation log and obtained copies of the log from May-October 2025, interviewed 4 Staff (S1-S4) and 11 residents (R2-R12), R1 was not able to interviewed as they are no longer a resident at the facility and LPA was not able to reach R1 through several phone call attempts. (Continued on LIC9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 6, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250220160903
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure resident was allowed to be readmitted to facility
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicol Wesley conducted a 10 day complaint visit at the facility and met with Administrator Priscilla Gaytan and discussed the purpose for todays visit. Investigation consisted of: staff roster, resident roster, residents discharge papers, ID page, physicians reports, interviewed staff #1, and requested specific documents from resident 1 files, attempted to interview resident #1. Investigation revealed: Regarding allegation:Staff did not ensure resident was allowed to be readmitted to facility. LPA Wesley spoke to the Administrator Priscilla Gaytan and she informed me that the facility did take the resident back, They are located in the memory care unit, LPA Wesley and the Administrator walked to the memory care unit and LPA greeted the resident and asked the name. They said they are resident 1. LPA Wesley spoke to staff 1 and she said there must have been a misunderstanding, they took the resident continued on LIC 9099C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 17, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250613111812

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not treat residents in care with respect.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Maldonado made a subsequent unannounced visit at the facility for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned allegations. LPA Maldonado met with assistant administrator Priscilla Gaytan and explained the purpose for the visit. On 09/21/22, LPA Maldonado obtained a copy of the resident and staff roster, interviewed Residents# 1-8 (R1-R8) and staff# 1-#8 (S1-S8). During today's visit, LPA Maldonado interviewed R9-R11 and reviewed files for S1-S8 to look for the required annual training. (Report Continued on LIC9099-C...) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 6, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220915160450
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has insects
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Luis Mora conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Priscilla Gaytan (Administrator) and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 09/07/22, LPA Flores conducted an initial complaint investigation and requested copies of staff/resident roster and 3 months of pest control services. LPA observed activity room, lobby, and conference room. Today's visit, LPA Mora conducted a tour of 15 residents' bedrooms and common areas, and interviewed Assistant Administrator, Staff 1 - Staff 3 (S1 - S3), and Resident 1 - Resident 15 (R1 - R15). The investigation revealed the following: regarding the allegation "facility has insects", it is alleged that a resident is getting bug bites at night inside the resident's bedroom and facility has not communicated with this resident to resolve the issue. (CONITNUED TO LIC 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 15, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220830095931
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedThe facility elevator is not in good operating condition.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted a complaint investigation regarding the allegation listed above. LPA arrived unannounced and met with Administrator, Cynthia Edwards. The purpose of the visit was explained. Assistant Administrator, Priscilla Gayton, assisted LPA with the visit today. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtain copies of the staff roster, resident roster, and service reports for the elevator for this year. LPA toured the facility and tested the 2 elevators. Interviews were conducted with the Administrator, Assistant Administrator, 7 Staff, 11 Residents, and a representative of the International Elevator Inc. (Continue on LIC9099C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 14, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220906133127
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff member lacks qualifications. Facility staff are not serving a good quality of food. Facility staff confine residents in their rooms. Facility staff does not ensure that residents are adequately hydrated. Facility is not adequately staffed to meet the needs of the residents. Facility is not kept clean. Facility staff do not assist resident with oral hygiene needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vasallo conducted a subsequent complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Priscilla Gaytan and explained the reason for the visit. The initial complaint visit was conducted on 3/29/22. The investigation consisted of the following: Interviews were conducted with 6 staff and 11 residents. The facility was toured and resident records were reviewed. The investigation revealed the following: Allegation - Facility staff member lacks qualifications. It's alleged facility staff are not competent enough to work with the elderly population they serve. Interviews conducted with residents did not support the allegation. Staff files were reviewed that caregivers and med techs have the required training and administrator has an administrator certificate. Based on the information obtained, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Continued on 9099C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 5, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220324131022
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility serves resident food that is not eatable. Facility opens resident's mail. Facility is giving resident medication that is not prescribed. Facility is charging resident for services not received. Facility does not serve meals at scheduled times.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vasallo conducted a subsequent complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Priscilla Gaytan and explained the reason for the visit. The initial complaint visit was conducted on 2/2/22. The investigation consisted of the following: Interviews were conducted with 8 residents and 4 staff. Resident #1's (R1) file was reviewed which included physician's report, psychiatric notes, conservatorship documents and medication records. The investigation revealed the following: Allegation - Facility serves resident food this is not eatable. Interviews conducted with residents revealed that the food has been better and there is more variety. Staff interviewed included management, Licensed Vocation Nurse (LVN), and caregiver. Staff indicate the food is good and reported that staff eat the food as well. The food was observed during the visit and there were no issues observed. Based on the information obtained, the allegationCDSS inspection report, June 23, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220126120119
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not assist resident in a timely manner.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Luis Mora conducted an unannounced complaint visit to determine the validity of the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Administrator Priscilla Gaytan and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained a copy of the residents and staff rosters, conducted a tour of the facility parking structure and interviewed the Administrator, Staff 1 - Staff 5 (S1 - S5) and Resident 1 - Resident 9 (R1 - R9). The investigaion revealed the following: regarding the allegation "staff did not assist resident in a timely manner.", it is alleged that an unknown resident is heard yelling for hours on end every couple of seconds and that this has been an ongoing issue for 9 months. LPA was able to identified the resident in question. (CONTINUED TO LIC 9099C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 12, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220504103458
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff retaliates against resident. Staff makes false statement regarding resident. Staff did not assist resident with obtaining medical care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vasallo conducted a complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA met with administrator, Priscilla Gaytan and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: Interviews were conducted with 4 staff and 3 residents. Resident #1's (R1's) records were reviewed. The facility was toured. The investigation revealed the following: Allegation - Staff retaliates against resident. It's alleged facility is retaliating against R1 for his/her behavior and as a result is attempting to evict R1. Staff interviewed deny R1 is being evicted and denied threatening R1 with eviction. R1 indicated he/she has not received an eviction notice. R1 indicated no one else heard or witnessed the threats made by staff. There were no other witnesses to the alleged incident and no eviction notice was served. Based on the information obtained, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Continued on 9099C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 22, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220316142527
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident's toileting needs are not being met in a timely manner. Resident is not being treated with respect.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kruz Long conducted an unannounced complaint investigation at the facility. Upon arrival, LPA met with Karen Meacham and explained the purpose of the visit. During today's visit, LPA obtained a copy of the Staff Schedule and Resident Roster. LPA interviewed Residents #2 to #11 in the library between 10:45 am to 1:00 pm, interviewed Staff #1 in the library at 1:12 pm and interviewed Staff #2 in the library at 2:03 pm. In regards to the allegation: Resident's toileting needs are not being met in a timely manner. Out of 10 Residents interviewed, 6 Residents either witnessed or was in need of toileting assistance corroborated that there were incidents of long wait times. Wait time for Staff to arrive and assist with toileting needs can be from 45 minutes to an hour. Continue to LIC9099C..... SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 3, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220225162408
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff failed to provide adequate food service. Staff failed to administer medication as instructed by physician.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vasallo conducted a subsequent complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Priscilla Gaytan and explained the reason for the visit. The initial complaint visit was conducted on 12/14/21. The investigation consisted of the following: Interviews were conducted with 10 residents and 5 staff. The facility was toured which included the kitchen at the time breakfast was being served. 6 residents' medications were also reviewed. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the food allegation, there were no details provided other than a black and white picture of food. Interviews conducted with residents revealed that the food has improved recently due to staff changes in the kitchen. Staff interviewed reported that they have also received positive feedback regarding the food recently. LPA toured the kitchen and observed breakfast being served. The kitchen was clean and had sufficient perishable and non-perishCDSS inspection report, February 23, 2022 · control 28-NP-20211207083241
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility elevator is in disrepair.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vasallo conducted a complaint visit to investigate the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Priscilla Gaytan and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: Interviews were conducted with 10 residents and 6 staff. The facility was toured and elevator was tested. The investigation revealed the following: The facility has 2 elevators, one near the front door and another near the dining area. Interviews conducted with staff revealed that the elevator near the dining room has stopped working. Maintenance staff was told by the elevator company to reset the elevator by turning the breaker on and off and the elevator will operate again. Staff deny anyone being trapped in the elevator. Residents interviewed confirmed that staff have reset the elevator and the elevator will start working again. Residents did not know of anyone being stuck in the elevator. Interviews conducted revealed that maintenance staff arCDSS inspection report, February 23, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220216090335

2021

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident went missing from facility. Staff are harassing residents. Facility is not testing residents after possible exposures.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Wong conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver the findings. LPA met with the Marketing Coordiantor Melissa Hernandez and explained the reason of the visit and shortly after, the administrator Priscilla Gaytan arrived and assisted with the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 10/06/21, LPA Irra conducted an initial 10 days complaint visit and obtained documents included: Resident Roster, Staff Roster (with contact information), List of new Resident Admissions for September 2021 and October 2021 (including "move outs"). Resident Trust Fund Report dated 10/01/21, List of Resident that recently changed to a new pharmacy and Special Incident Report related to latest COVID 19 (+) case from August 2021 (including notification provided to Residents, Staff, Responsible Parties). On 10/26/21, LPA Wong conducted a follow up visit and interviewed administrator, nine staff (S1-S9) and ten residents (R1-R10). During today's visit,CDSS inspection report, December 1, 2021 · control 28-AS-20210928104457
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnqualified staff administering medication to residents.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vasallo conducted a subsequent complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Priscilla Gaytan and explained the reason for the visit. The initial complaint visit was conducted on 11/4/21. The investigation consisted of the following: During the initial visit, interviews were conducted with six staff and eight residents. The first and second floor were toured and LPA obtained the resident and staff roster and staff schedule. Eight additional residents were interviewed during the subsequent complaint visit. The investigation revealed the following: Interviews conducted with staff revealed that Staff #1 (S1) passed medication the evening of 10/25/21. S1 is a caregiver and was interviewed on 10/25/21. S1 confirmed he/she passed medication on 10/25/21 to approximately 20 residents. S1 was asked to pass medication because multiple medication room staff called off of on 10/25/21. S1 indicated he/she has not been properCDSS inspection report, November 17, 2021 · control 28-AS-20211027103534
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is short staffed. Facility is mismanaging the resident(s) medication(s). Staff are not administering medications to residents as prescribed. Resident's dietary needs are not being met. Food services are inadequate. Facility is dirty.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vasallo conducted a subsequent complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA met with administrator, Priscilla Gaytan and explained the reason for the visit. The initial complaint visit was conducted on 9/17/21. A subsequent complaint visit was conducted on 9/22/21. The investigation consisted of the following: During the initial and subsequent complaint visits, a total of twenty-two residents and fourteen staff were interviewed. The facility was toured including resident bedrooms, hallways on the first and second floor, kitchen, dining room and common areas. During today's visit two additional staff and two residents were interviewed and the medication room was inspected today. The investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Facility is short staffed. Staff interviewed included Medical Technician's (Med Techs), Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN's), caregivers, food service staff, housekeeping and administration. Continued on 9099CCDSS inspection report, September 30, 2021 · control 28-AS-20210908115240
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is maintained in disrepair.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vasallo and Mora conducted a complaint visit to investigate the allegation listed above. LPA's met with administrator, Priscilla Gaytan and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: Interviews were conducted with fourteen residents and four staff. The facility was toured including resident bedrooms, hallways first and second floor, kitchen, dining room and common areas. LPA's also obtained a resident and staff roster. The investigation revealed the following: It's alleged Resident #1's (R1) air conditioning unit is not installed properly in the room. LPA's entered the room and inspected the unit. The unit appeared to be installed properly and was operating. R1 indicated he/she moved into the room recently and the room was previously vacant. R1 indicated maintenance fixed the unit a short time later by adding weather stripping around the unit. Staff interviewed denied the allegation. Staff indicated the unit was nevCDSS inspection report, September 17, 2021 · control 28-AS-20210913130021
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not assist resident with medications as needed.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vasallo conducted a complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Priscilla Gaytan and explain the reason for the visit. The initial complaint visit was conducted on 7/2/21. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained the resident and staff roster and staff schedule. During the initial visit Interviews were conducted with 9 residents and and 2 staff. On 7/16/21, 2 additional residents and 7 additional staff were interviewed. 1 additional staff was interviewed today. Facility was toured including first floor, second floor and garden area. The investigation revealed the following: 5 out of the 11 residents interviewed indicated they have missed as needed medication or pain medication or the medication has been delivered to residents late. Residents reported waiting 1 to 2 hours sometimes to receive the medication. Residents believe the facility is short staffed because of the long response time by sCDSS inspection report, July 21, 2021 · control 28-AS-20210630154541
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedInsufficient staffing to meet residents' needs.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vasallo conducted a complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Priscilla Gaytan and explain the reason for the visit. The initial complaint visit was conducted on 6/19/21. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained the resident and staff roster, shower schedule and staff schedule. During the initial visit Interviews were conducted with 5 residents and 6 staff. Facility was toured and intercom system was tested. On 7/2/21, Interviews were conducted with 9 residents and 2 staff. On 7/16/21, 2 residents and 7 staff were interviewed. 1 additional staff was interviewed today. Facility was also toured including first floor, second floor and garden area. The investigation revealed the following: It's alleged there is insufficient staffing to meet the residents needs. 12 out of the 16 residents interviewed reported that the facility is short staffed. Continued on 9099C. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 21, 2021 · control 28-AS-20210611104456
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is not serving food of the quality necessary to meet the residents' needs.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vasallo conducted a subsequent complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA met with administrator, Priscilla Gaytan and explained the reason for the visit. The initial complaint visit was conducted on 7/2/21. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained the resident and staff roster. Interviews were conducted with 11 residents and 8 staff. Facility was toured including first floor, second floor, garden area and kitchen. The investigation revealed the following: All residents interviewed indicated the food is not good. Residents described the food as too salty, tough in texture, not well cooked, and the quality of the food is bad. Residents described the drinks served as watered down. Staff interviewed included medical technicians, caregivers, supervisors, cooks, and house keeping. Staff indicated they have received many complaints about the quality of the food served. Continued on 9099C. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 16, 2021 · control 28-AS-20210628091908

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 79 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
11
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
17
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
30
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
59
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
79
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(909) 599-8441
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run San Dimas Retirement Center? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.