Orchard Park Senior Living Community is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Clearlake, Lake County, California — state license #176803831, with a licensed capacity of 56, listed as closed, change of ownership in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 22 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated December 15, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

3 homes in view

Orchard Park Senior Living Community

The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.

The state also licenses a home at this address today: Orchard Park Al And Memory Care · licence #176804346

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 56 residents · Clearlake, CA · Lake County
Closed in state recordWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days · we confirm by phone before any referral
License #176803831, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
14789 Burns Valley Road · Clearlake, Lake County
Phone
(707) 995-1900
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 56 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 5 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 56 NON AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 5 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOPSICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 5 RESIDENTS. NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LAKESIDE VISTA SENIOR LLC, EFFECTIVE 12/31/2024.State service designation985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 24 times and filed 22 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on December 15, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”

Most recent state visit
December 15, 2025
Occupancy at that visit
26 of 56 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 6 documents with transcribed findings, dated June 1, 2023 to December 15, 2025. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 6 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 16 of 22 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20255 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not respond to resident council in a timely manner

On 12/15/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Julie Florio arrived unannounced to deliver complaint #21-AS-20251119145338 investigation findings regarding the above allegation and met with Melissa Jones, Administrator. Reporting Party (RP) alleges that staff did not respond to resident council in a timely manner. On 11/20/2025, LPA Florio conducted a phone interview with RP and requested copies of correspondence regarding recent resident council meeting notes. On 11/21/2025, LPA received copies of these documents for 02/14/2025, 09/12/2025, and 11/14/2025 resident council meetings. Based on the interview conducted and documents received, it was revealed that the 02/14/2025 and 09/12/2025 meeting minutes were not signed by the resident council president or the facility administrator as required. Continued on LIC9099C... Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 15, 2025 · control 21-AS-20251119145338
Sep 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 31, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff allow residents to be left in soiled clothing for an extended period of time Staff do not ensure residents receive adequate food portions Staff do not ensure residents are provided with snacks in between meals each day Staff handle residents in a rough manner

At approximately 9:00AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced to conduct an investigation into the above allegations. LPA's met with Executive Director Melissa Jones, toured the building, reviewed records and interviewed staff and residents. Based on interviews conducted, LPA did not find evidence to support the allegation that Staff allow residents to be left in soiled clothing for an extended period of time. Facility staff conduct checks at least every 2 hours on each resident in the facility. Residents needing more assistance receive it more frequently. LPA was informed most residents are able to communicate their needs and are not shy about letting staff know. Those residents that are not able to communicate their needs are checked on more frequently. Based on interviews conducted, LPA did not find evidence to support the allegation that Staff do not ensure residents receive adequate food portions and Staff do not ensure residents are pthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 31, 2025 · control 21-AS-20241115151846
20245 state visits · 7 documents
Sep 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff not responding to assist in a timely manner Staff are not properly trained

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hansen arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint findings of the above allegations and met with Danelle Santoni, Administrator. Staff not responding to assist in a timely manner - Complainant alleges staff do not respond to resident falls or pendants appropriately and have ignored resident (R6) calls multiple times. Former Administrator on separate occasions stated the facility has a 3-5-minute response time to call buttons and if they can't respond they will go over the radio for someone/anyone to respond to the resident making sure it is not an emergency (from complaint 21-AS-20230214104332). Interview with staff (S3) indicated they believed between 5-7 minutes was the response time frame. CISCOR One Source (call bell system) report obtained from 1/29/2024-2/9/2024 for R6 reflect pendent button initiated 166 times with at least 8 response times between 10-15 minutes, at least 18 response times between15-30 minutes, and at least 2 respthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 1, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240223111603
Aug 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained an unexplained injury

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hansen arrived unannounced on this day for the purpose of delivering findings of the above allegation. LPA met with Danelle Santoni, Administrator. During the course of this investigation LPA conducted interviews, made observations, and obtained documents regarding the allegation. Resident sustained unexplained injury – Complaint alleges resident sustained a bruise of unknown origin. Documents obtained during investigation from facility indicate resident (R1) had a fall while away from facility on 5/8/2024 and was taken to the hospital where R1 was diagnosed with a fracture of the lower left arm, that now has a cast. LPA’s interview with outside medical professional on 5/20/2024 indicates R1 had a bruise right above the top of the cast, the size of a thumb print that was observed on 5/13/2024. LPA conducted multiple interviews with staff. Continue on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 1, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240515141136
Feb 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Due to lack of supervision, resident was assaulted by another resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hansen arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint findings of the above allegation and met with Assistant Administrator Measha Edwards. Due to lack of supervision, resident was assaulted by another resident- complainant alleges a resident (R1) in the memory care unit of facility has repeatedly assaulted others and although the facility has taken some action, assaults by R1 have escalated significantly putting residents at risk. Investigation revealed R1 was admitted to memory care of facility at the end of June 2023. On 7/15/2023 R1 hit another resident in the back of the head with a coffee cup sending resident to the hospital. Facility removed all glassware from memory care. Record review revealed in August 2023 additional monitoring of R1’s behaviors. Facility records indicate 12/2023 staffing – 3 caregivers for AM shift of facility with 1 Med Tech, same for PM shift. Continue on LIC9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240108085839
Jan 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20234 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 4, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 6, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 30, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 19, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations4typical 1
Substantiated complaints4typical 2
Total complaints7typical 7
State visits on file24typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20255512024572202366020223302021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$4,000$8,000 /mo
our estimate — broad statewide California range, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one.
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →

Is Orchard Park Senior Living Community licensed?

No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Orchard Park Senior Living Community in Clearlake (Lake County), California license #176803831, as “Closed, Change Of Ownership, formerly licensed for 56 residents. State records list 22 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated December 15, 2025, was marked “Substantiated” by the state.

Can Orchard Park Senior Living Community care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Orchard Park Senior Living Community with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 56 NON AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 5 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOPSICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 5 RESIDENTS. NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LAKESIDE VISTA SENIOR LLC, EFFECTIVE 12/31/2024.

How much does Orchard Park Senior Living Community cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Orchard Park Senior Living Community's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Lake County typically runs $4,000–$8,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$7,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Orchard Park Senior Living Community accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Orchard Park Senior Living Community is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

26 of 56 beds occupied (46%) when the state visited on December 15, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Orchard Park Senior Living Community?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 24 state visits and 22 dated documents since 2021 for Orchard Park Senior Living Community; 6 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 15, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

6 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not respond to resident council in a timely manner
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 12/15/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Julie Florio arrived unannounced to deliver complaint #21-AS-20251119145338 investigation findings regarding the above allegation and met with Melissa Jones, Administrator. Reporting Party (RP) alleges that staff did not respond to resident council in a timely manner. On 11/20/2025, LPA Florio conducted a phone interview with RP and requested copies of correspondence regarding recent resident council meeting notes. On 11/21/2025, LPA received copies of these documents for 02/14/2025, 09/12/2025, and 11/14/2025 resident council meetings. Based on the interview conducted and documents received, it was revealed that the 02/14/2025 and 09/12/2025 meeting minutes were not signed by the resident council president or the facility administrator as required. Continued on LIC9099C... SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 15, 2025 · control 21-AS-20251119145338
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff allow residents to be left in soiled clothing for an extended period of time Staff do not ensure residents receive adequate food portions Staff do not ensure residents are provided with snacks in between meals each day Staff handle residents in a rough manner
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 9:00AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced to conduct an investigation into the above allegations. LPA's met with Executive Director Melissa Jones, toured the building, reviewed records and interviewed staff and residents. Based on interviews conducted, LPA did not find evidence to support the allegation that Staff allow residents to be left in soiled clothing for an extended period of time. Facility staff conduct checks at least every 2 hours on each resident in the facility. Residents needing more assistance receive it more frequently. LPA was informed most residents are able to communicate their needs and are not shy about letting staff know. Those residents that are not able to communicate their needs are checked on more frequently. Based on interviews conducted, LPA did not find evidence to support the allegation that Staff do not ensure residents receive adequate food portions and Staff do not ensure residents are pCDSS inspection report, January 31, 2025 · control 21-AS-20241115151846

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff not responding to assist in a timely manner Staff are not properly trained
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hansen arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint findings of the above allegations and met with Danelle Santoni, Administrator. Staff not responding to assist in a timely manner - Complainant alleges staff do not respond to resident falls or pendants appropriately and have ignored resident (R6) calls multiple times. Former Administrator on separate occasions stated the facility has a 3-5-minute response time to call buttons and if they can't respond they will go over the radio for someone/anyone to respond to the resident making sure it is not an emergency (from complaint 21-AS-20230214104332). Interview with staff (S3) indicated they believed between 5-7 minutes was the response time frame. CISCOR One Source (call bell system) report obtained from 1/29/2024-2/9/2024 for R6 reflect pendent button initiated 166 times with at least 8 response times between 10-15 minutes, at least 18 response times between15-30 minutes, and at least 2 respCDSS inspection report, August 1, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240223111603
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained an unexplained injury
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hansen arrived unannounced on this day for the purpose of delivering findings of the above allegation. LPA met with Danelle Santoni, Administrator. During the course of this investigation LPA conducted interviews, made observations, and obtained documents regarding the allegation. Resident sustained unexplained injury – Complaint alleges resident sustained a bruise of unknown origin. Documents obtained during investigation from facility indicate resident (R1) had a fall while away from facility on 5/8/2024 and was taken to the hospital where R1 was diagnosed with a fracture of the lower left arm, that now has a cast. LPA’s interview with outside medical professional on 5/20/2024 indicates R1 had a bruise right above the top of the cast, the size of a thumb print that was observed on 5/13/2024. LPA conducted multiple interviews with staff. Continue on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 1, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240515141136
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedDue to lack of supervision, resident was assaulted by another resident
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hansen arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint findings of the above allegation and met with Assistant Administrator Measha Edwards. Due to lack of supervision, resident was assaulted by another resident- complainant alleges a resident (R1) in the memory care unit of facility has repeatedly assaulted others and although the facility has taken some action, assaults by R1 have escalated significantly putting residents at risk. Investigation revealed R1 was admitted to memory care of facility at the end of June 2023. On 7/15/2023 R1 hit another resident in the back of the head with a coffee cup sending resident to the hospital. Facility removed all glassware from memory care. Record review revealed in August 2023 additional monitoring of R1’s behaviors. Facility records indicate 12/2023 staffing – 3 caregivers for AM shift of facility with 1 Med Tech, same for PM shift. Continue on LIC9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 30, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240108085839

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not meeting the residents care needs Staff do not respond timely to resident’s call for assistance Facility does not have a call system in place
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 9:10 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hansen arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation and met with Assistant Administrator, Measha Edwards, Administrator Audrenna Verling was not available. During investigation, LPA reviewed documents, made observation’s and conducted interviews. Facility does not have a call system in place & Staff do not respond timely to resident’s call for assistance – Complaint alleges facility does not have call buttons or equivalent in certain areas of the facility (Memory Care). LPA conducted interviews with Residential Coordinator, Memory Care Coordinator, and Administrator on separate occasions stating the facility has pull cords in all bathrooms, in the Assisted Living section residents have wrist call buttons which facility has a 10-minute response time according to call log report. In the memory care section, there is no wrist call button but if residents are not in the common area there is a mandCDSS inspection report, June 1, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230214104332

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 24 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
4
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
4
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
7
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
24
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(707) 995-1900
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Orchard Park Senior Living Community? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.