High Desert Haven is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Ridgecrest, Kern County, California — state license #157209516, licensed for 154 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 23 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2025, the most recent dated May 13, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

High Desert Haven

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 154 residents · Ridgecrest, CA · Kern County
LicensedMemory careHospiceBedriddenWheelchair not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #157209516, held since 2025 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1240 College Heights Blvd. · Ridgecrest, Kern County
Phone
(760) 371-1989
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file — ask the home
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careVerified in record

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 96 AMBULATORY, 32 NON-AMBULAOTRY, AND 26 BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR (6).State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2025, the state has visited this home 26 times and filed 23 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on May 13, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unfounded.”

Most recent state visit
May 13, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
73 of 154 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 11 documents with transcribed findings, dated June 24, 2025 to May 13, 2026. 11 of the 11 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (5). 11 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 11 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 23 of 23 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20265 state visits · 10 documents
May 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility charged resident's bank account without authorization

On 5/13/26 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) M. Medina and M. Garza arrived at the facility for an unannounced complaint visit. LPAs met with Activities Director, Taylor Lloyd and Wellness Director, Elizabeth Vasku to conduct visit. During visit LPAs conducted interviews, requested and received the following documents for R1: medical assessment, pre-admission appraisal, admission agreement, ALW paperwork and ACH paperwork. During interviews, R1 indicated that they received their bank statement and saw charges from the facility and notified the bank of possible unauthorized charges. R1 stated that they then reviewed their bank statements from previous months and realized the charges are for their responsible portion of monthly rent. R1 stated they provided a voided check to facility during admission to facility. R1 also acknowledged that the initials on the Authorization Agreement for Direct Deposit Payments form for ACH debits was their signature. This Department has found that the abothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 13, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260512144042
May 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not addressing pests at facility Staff did not prevent resident from smoking while residents use oxygen Staff do not maintain facility in good repair Staff do not ensure that residents care needs are met Facility smells malodorous

On 5/13/26 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) M. Medina and M. Garza arrived at the facility for an unannounced complaint visit. LPAs met with Activities Director, Taylor Lloyd who contacted, Administrator Brittany Kavanaugh by telephone to advise of complaint visit. Wellness Director, Elizabeth Vasku arrived a short time later ton also conduct visit. Residents were observed in common areas and in their rooms. During subsequent visit, LPAs conducted additional interviews. Facility provided documentation showing pest control provided treatment in two phases, conducted 2 weeks apart for resident 1's (R1s) room. Facility provided documentation of occurrences with R1 for smoking in unauthorized areas. R1 was provided redirection to the designated smoking area and resident signed acknowledgement for resident smoking policy. Facility had an incident on 4/16/26, for a smell of burning in facility. The fire department was dispatched and facility was cleared with no fires. Invoice provided fromthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 13, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260421083453
May 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 12, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility washers and dryers are in disrepair

On 4/29/2026, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) M. Medina and M. Garza conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to facility. LPAs introduced themselves and stated purpose of visit, LPAs met with Administrator, Brittany Kavanaugh via telephone and gave permission for visit to be completed with Wellness Director, Elizabeth Vasku. During visits LPAs toured facility, completed interviews, requested and reviewed documentation (staff schedules, resident roster, invoices, staff training records). During facility tour on 4/11/2026, LPAs observed the following in the assisted living building, 2 washers and 1 dryer that were inoperable, in the memory care building of the facility 1 washer and 1 dryer that were inoperable. The allegation listed above have met the preponderance of evidence standard per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. The allegations are SUBSTANTIATED.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260403093954
Mar 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure to provide resident's transportation to doctor appointments Staff does not follow activities calendar

Licensing Program Analyst Shawna Doucette met with Administrator at the Fresno Regional Office to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Brittany Kavanaugh and Wellness Director Elizabeth Vasku and Licensee Ben Berkowitz (Teams). During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted a facility tour, reviewed records, and conducted interviews. Interviews conducted with residents revealed that R1 missed two doctor appointments between August and September 2025 and R2 missed a doctor appointment on 11/19/2025 due to transportation staff not being present. Upon review of S1’s personnel file, LPA discovered that S1 was released from employment due to S1’s failure to transport residents to their scheduled appointments. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 27, 2026 · control 24-AS-20251110182020
Jan 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not follow proper eviction procedures for resident.

Licensing Program Analyst Shawna Doucette met with Administrator at the Fresno Regional Office to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Brittany Kavanaugh and Wellness Director Elizabeth Vasku. Licensee Ben Berkowitz. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed records. Upon review of records, it was found that R1 was admitted to the hospital on 11/4/2025 due to behavioral issues at the facility. Hospital staff attempted to discharge R1 to the facility on the same date, however discharge was unsuccessful. Hospital staff contacted the Ombudsman, who assisted R1 in returning to the facility. R1 was discharged and transferred back to the facility on 11/21/2025. Based on interviews conducted and records review, the allegation: Licensee did not follow proper eviction procedures for resident is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did notthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 27, 2026 · control 24-AS-20251112135800
Jan 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20259 state visits · 13 documents
Dec 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are transporting residents while under the influence, impairing their ability to provide adequate care and supervision

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA)'s Shawna Doucette and Brianna Miranda arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings. LPA's met with Staff Danielle Mouw. LPA's interviewed staff and residents. Interviews revealed that staff have never seen S1 using drugs or alcohol at the facility. It is unknown if staff are transporting residents while under the influence, impairing the ability to provide adequate care and supervision. Based on interviews, Although the allegations listed may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. A copy of this report was provided. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 10, 2025 · control 24-AS-20251119091440
Dec 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident ingested another residents medication due to staff leaving medication accessible to other residents in care

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Daiquiri Boyd and Shawna Doucette conducted the 10 Day complaint investigation visit to the facility. During the course of this complaint investigation visit, LPAs interviewed staff and obtained and/or reviewed resident and facility records. It was determined based on the Incident Report submitted by the facility and records review that the above allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. Facility staff left medication accessible, allowing a resident (R1) access to another residents (R2) medications, and as a result R1 then injested medication that was prescribed for R2, requiring medical attention for R1. Based on LPAs records review and submitted reports, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250825180500
Sep 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure resident is spoken to in an appropriate manner Staff do not ensure residents room is kept in clean sanitary conditions Staff does not ensure residents dietary plan is followed Staff does not ensure food being served is of good quality Staff does not ensure residents personal hygiene needs are being met Facility did not replace residents personal property due to being damaged

Licensing Program Analysts LPA’s Shawna Doucette and Daiquiri Boyd arrived at the facility unannounced to investigate and deliver complaint findings. LPA’s met with Wellness Director Elizabeth Vasku. LPA's reviewed records and conducted interviews. Regarding the allegation Staff does not ensure resident is spoken to in an appropriate manner Based on staff interviews and resident interviews there were no witnesses to staff speaking inappropriately to a resident. Regarding allegation Staff do not ensure residents room is kept in clean sanitary conditions. Based on facility tour, LPA's observed several resident rooms to be clean. Based on staff interviews R1 often refuses to allow staff to clean R1's room. Based on resident interviews staff are cleaning rooms frequently, as allowed by residents. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250902145755
Aug 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff neglect resulted in a resident sustaining multiple pressure injuries Staff do not meet the needs of residents diagnosed with a restricted health condition Staff do not provide adequate care and supervision of the residents Staff are not following proper reporting requirements Staff are mishandling the residents medications

Licensing Program Analysts LPA’s Shawna Doucette and Sarah Hurt arrived at the facility unannounced to investigate and deliver complaint findings. LPA’s met with Administrator Linda Poythress. LPA's conducted interviews and reviewed records. Regarding the allegation Staff neglect resulted in a resident sustaining multiple pressure injuries: Based on records review and interviews, during visit on 06/27/25 R7 did not have a Hospice Care Plan. LPA's Sarah Hurt and Shawna Doucette returned on 08/6/25 and R7 has a Hospice Care plan, which does not address the stage of R7's wound or that R7 has a wound and staff responsibilities. Hospice care plan states R7 needs to be turned/repostioned every 2 hours. Hospice Care Plan does not state staff were trained on repositioning/turning R7, however R7 is not bedridden. Staff interviews indicate R7 does have a wound. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 6, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250625124618
Aug 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure temperature of food served to resident was appropriate, resulting in resident sustaining multiple burns. Staff threatened resident.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Shawna Doucette and Daiquiri Boyd arrived at the facility 09/03/2025 to amend documents previously signed. Licensing Program Analysts LPA’s Shawna Doucette and Sarah Hurt arrived at the facility on 0716/2025 unannounced to deliver complaint findings. LPA’s met with Administrator Linda Poythress. LPA interviewed residents and staff. LPA reviewed medical records. Based on medical records review and interviews, it is undetermined whether staff did or did not ensure the food served to residents was at an appropriate temperature, resulting in resident sustaining multiple burns. Medical records did not indicate resident sustained any burns. Based on interviews, it is undetermined if staff threatened a resident. Through interviews conducted, LPA did not find any evidence of threatening statements being made to any residents. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 16, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250620164716
Jul 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not distribute resident's medication as prescribed Staff did not assist resident with showering Staff did not ensure that resident's incontinence care needs were met

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Sarah Hurt and Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced facility visit to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA met with facility Administrator Linda Poythress, and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation Staff did not distribute resident's medication as prescribed. Resident 1 was not given several doses of their medications on Friday June 13, 2025. The facility staff stated there was a miscommunication upon admission with the facilities online medication tracking system causing Resident 1's missed medication doses. Based on interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 24, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250617153822
Apr 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations6typical 1
Type B citations6typical 1
Substantiated complaints12typical 2
Total complaints11typical 7
State visits on file26typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2025.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026510220259133
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Kern County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Ask how the 2026 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (760) 371-1989

Is High Desert Haven licensed?

Yes — High Desert Haven is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Ridgecrest (Kern County): California license #157209516, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 154 residents. State records list 23 inspection and complaint documents since 2025; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 13, 2026, was marked “Unfounded” by the state.

Can High Desert Haven care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists High Desert Haven with clearances for dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list wheelchair / non-ambulatory. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 96 AMBULATORY, 32 NON-AMBULAOTRY, AND 26 BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR (6).

How much does High Desert Haven cost?

California's public licensing record does not include High Desert Haven's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Kern County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does High Desert Haven accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

High Desert Haven is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

73 of 154 beds occupied (47%) when the state visited on May 13, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for High Desert Haven?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 26 state visits and 23 dated documents since 2025 for High Desert Haven; 11 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 13, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unfounded. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

11 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility charged resident's bank account without authorization
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 5/13/26 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) M. Medina and M. Garza arrived at the facility for an unannounced complaint visit. LPAs met with Activities Director, Taylor Lloyd and Wellness Director, Elizabeth Vasku to conduct visit. During visit LPAs conducted interviews, requested and received the following documents for R1: medical assessment, pre-admission appraisal, admission agreement, ALW paperwork and ACH paperwork. During interviews, R1 indicated that they received their bank statement and saw charges from the facility and notified the bank of possible unauthorized charges. R1 stated that they then reviewed their bank statements from previous months and realized the charges are for their responsible portion of monthly rent. R1 stated they provided a voided check to facility during admission to facility. R1 also acknowledged that the initials on the Authorization Agreement for Direct Deposit Payments form for ACH debits was their signature. This Department has found that the aboCDSS inspection report, May 13, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260512144042
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not addressing pests at facility Staff did not prevent resident from smoking while residents use oxygen Staff do not maintain facility in good repair Staff do not ensure that residents care needs are met Facility smells malodorous
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 5/13/26 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) M. Medina and M. Garza arrived at the facility for an unannounced complaint visit. LPAs met with Activities Director, Taylor Lloyd who contacted, Administrator Brittany Kavanaugh by telephone to advise of complaint visit. Wellness Director, Elizabeth Vasku arrived a short time later ton also conduct visit. Residents were observed in common areas and in their rooms. During subsequent visit, LPAs conducted additional interviews. Facility provided documentation showing pest control provided treatment in two phases, conducted 2 weeks apart for resident 1's (R1s) room. Facility provided documentation of occurrences with R1 for smoking in unauthorized areas. R1 was provided redirection to the designated smoking area and resident signed acknowledgement for resident smoking policy. Facility had an incident on 4/16/26, for a smell of burning in facility. The fire department was dispatched and facility was cleared with no fires. Invoice provided fromCDSS inspection report, May 13, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260421083453
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility washers and dryers are in disrepair
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 4/29/2026, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) M. Medina and M. Garza conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to facility. LPAs introduced themselves and stated purpose of visit, LPAs met with Administrator, Brittany Kavanaugh via telephone and gave permission for visit to be completed with Wellness Director, Elizabeth Vasku. During visits LPAs toured facility, completed interviews, requested and reviewed documentation (staff schedules, resident roster, invoices, staff training records). During facility tour on 4/11/2026, LPAs observed the following in the assisted living building, 2 washers and 1 dryer that were inoperable, in the memory care building of the facility 1 washer and 1 dryer that were inoperable. The allegation listed above have met the preponderance of evidence standard per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. The allegations are SUBSTANTIATED.CDSS inspection report, April 29, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260403093954
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure to provide resident's transportation to doctor appointments Staff does not follow activities calendar
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst Shawna Doucette met with Administrator at the Fresno Regional Office to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Brittany Kavanaugh and Wellness Director Elizabeth Vasku and Licensee Ben Berkowitz (Teams). During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted a facility tour, reviewed records, and conducted interviews. Interviews conducted with residents revealed that R1 missed two doctor appointments between August and September 2025 and R2 missed a doctor appointment on 11/19/2025 due to transportation staff not being present. Upon review of S1’s personnel file, LPA discovered that S1 was released from employment due to S1’s failure to transport residents to their scheduled appointments. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 27, 2026 · control 24-AS-20251110182020
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not follow proper eviction procedures for resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Shawna Doucette met with Administrator at the Fresno Regional Office to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Brittany Kavanaugh and Wellness Director Elizabeth Vasku. Licensee Ben Berkowitz. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed records. Upon review of records, it was found that R1 was admitted to the hospital on 11/4/2025 due to behavioral issues at the facility. Hospital staff attempted to discharge R1 to the facility on the same date, however discharge was unsuccessful. Hospital staff contacted the Ombudsman, who assisted R1 in returning to the facility. R1 was discharged and transferred back to the facility on 11/21/2025. Based on interviews conducted and records review, the allegation: Licensee did not follow proper eviction procedures for resident is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did notCDSS inspection report, January 27, 2026 · control 24-AS-20251112135800

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are transporting residents while under the influence, impairing their ability to provide adequate care and supervision
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA)'s Shawna Doucette and Brianna Miranda arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings. LPA's met with Staff Danielle Mouw. LPA's interviewed staff and residents. Interviews revealed that staff have never seen S1 using drugs or alcohol at the facility. It is unknown if staff are transporting residents while under the influence, impairing the ability to provide adequate care and supervision. Based on interviews, Although the allegations listed may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. A copy of this report was provided. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 10, 2025 · control 24-AS-20251119091440
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident ingested another residents medication due to staff leaving medication accessible to other residents in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Daiquiri Boyd and Shawna Doucette conducted the 10 Day complaint investigation visit to the facility. During the course of this complaint investigation visit, LPAs interviewed staff and obtained and/or reviewed resident and facility records. It was determined based on the Incident Report submitted by the facility and records review that the above allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. Facility staff left medication accessible, allowing a resident (R1) access to another residents (R2) medications, and as a result R1 then injested medication that was prescribed for R2, requiring medical attention for R1. Based on LPAs records review and submitted reports, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 3, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250825180500
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure resident is spoken to in an appropriate manner Staff do not ensure residents room is kept in clean sanitary conditions Staff does not ensure residents dietary plan is followed Staff does not ensure food being served is of good quality Staff does not ensure residents personal hygiene needs are being met Facility did not replace residents personal property due to being damaged
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts LPA’s Shawna Doucette and Daiquiri Boyd arrived at the facility unannounced to investigate and deliver complaint findings. LPA’s met with Wellness Director Elizabeth Vasku. LPA's reviewed records and conducted interviews. Regarding the allegation Staff does not ensure resident is spoken to in an appropriate manner Based on staff interviews and resident interviews there were no witnesses to staff speaking inappropriately to a resident. Regarding allegation Staff do not ensure residents room is kept in clean sanitary conditions. Based on facility tour, LPA's observed several resident rooms to be clean. Based on staff interviews R1 often refuses to allow staff to clean R1's room. Based on resident interviews staff are cleaning rooms frequently, as allowed by residents. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 3, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250902145755
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff neglect resulted in a resident sustaining multiple pressure injuries Staff do not meet the needs of residents diagnosed with a restricted health condition Staff do not provide adequate care and supervision of the residents Staff are not following proper reporting requirements Staff are mishandling the residents medications
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts LPA’s Shawna Doucette and Sarah Hurt arrived at the facility unannounced to investigate and deliver complaint findings. LPA’s met with Administrator Linda Poythress. LPA's conducted interviews and reviewed records. Regarding the allegation Staff neglect resulted in a resident sustaining multiple pressure injuries: Based on records review and interviews, during visit on 06/27/25 R7 did not have a Hospice Care Plan. LPA's Sarah Hurt and Shawna Doucette returned on 08/6/25 and R7 has a Hospice Care plan, which does not address the stage of R7's wound or that R7 has a wound and staff responsibilities. Hospice care plan states R7 needs to be turned/repostioned every 2 hours. Hospice Care Plan does not state staff were trained on repositioning/turning R7, however R7 is not bedridden. Staff interviews indicate R7 does have a wound. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 6, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250625124618
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure temperature of food served to resident was appropriate, resulting in resident sustaining multiple burns. Staff threatened resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Shawna Doucette and Daiquiri Boyd arrived at the facility 09/03/2025 to amend documents previously signed. Licensing Program Analysts LPA’s Shawna Doucette and Sarah Hurt arrived at the facility on 0716/2025 unannounced to deliver complaint findings. LPA’s met with Administrator Linda Poythress. LPA interviewed residents and staff. LPA reviewed medical records. Based on medical records review and interviews, it is undetermined whether staff did or did not ensure the food served to residents was at an appropriate temperature, resulting in resident sustaining multiple burns. Medical records did not indicate resident sustained any burns. Based on interviews, it is undetermined if staff threatened a resident. Through interviews conducted, LPA did not find any evidence of threatening statements being made to any residents. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 16, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250620164716
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not distribute resident's medication as prescribed Staff did not assist resident with showering Staff did not ensure that resident's incontinence care needs were met
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Sarah Hurt and Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced facility visit to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA met with facility Administrator Linda Poythress, and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation Staff did not distribute resident's medication as prescribed. Resident 1 was not given several doses of their medications on Friday June 13, 2025. The facility staff stated there was a miscommunication upon admission with the facilities online medication tracking system causing Resident 1's missed medication doses. Based on interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 24, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250617153822

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 26 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
6
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
6
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
12
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
11
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
26
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(760) 371-1989
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run High Desert Haven? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.