Ivy Park At San Lauren is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Bakersfield, Kern County, California — state license #157208915, licensed for 68 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 24 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated June 8, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Ivy Park At San Lauren

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 68 residents · Bakersfield, CA · Kern County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #157208915, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
5300 Hageman Rd · Bakersfield, Kern County
Phone
(661) 218-8333
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 68 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 10 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF 68 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN; HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 15 RESIDENTS; NEW MGMT COMPANY; OAKMONT MANAGMENT GROUP LLC EFFECTIVE 04/01/2025.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 27 times and filed 24 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 8, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 8, 2026
Occupancy at the May 8, 2025 visit
66 of 68 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 11 documents with transcribed findings, dated February 18, 2022 to May 8, 2025. 11 of the 11 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unfounded” (6). 11 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 11 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 12 of 24 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jun 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20254 state visits · 6 documents
Jun 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident has not received a shower for an extended period of time

On 5/8/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rachel Bruce conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit to the facility. During the course of this complaint investigation LPA interviewed staff and residents and obtained and/or reviewed facility records. It was determined based on the interviews and records review that the above allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. Facility did not have hot water available to residents for over 7 days during February 2025. During this time residents had no access to their regular shower and although there was one shower available in another unit, many residents did not know and/or did not feel comfortable so many residents went without a proper shower until the units were repaired. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. See attached citation. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, a cthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 8, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250211120402
Mar 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility was without hot water in the residential section of the builiding.

On February 19, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rachel Bruce conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit to the facility. During the course of this complaint investigation LPA interviewed staff and residents on duty and obtained and/or reviewed facility records. It was determined based on the interviews and records review that the above allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. Facility did not did not have hot water available to residents for over 7 days. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 Article 5 is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.”) Refer to Case Management dated February 19, 2025 for an additional deficiency. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, a copy of this report with plan of corrections, and appeal rights were provided. Substantthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 19, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250211103342
20244 state visits · 5 documents
Sep 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained multiple pressure injuries due to staff neglect Resident sustained injury due to staff handling resident in a rough manner Staff did not seek medical attention for resident Staff did not allow hospice to come and provide care for resident Staff are not providing adequate food service for resident Staff left resident in soiled diapers for an extended period of time Staff are not responding to resident's call button Staff did not ensure resident had access to call button

On 01/03/2024, Licensing Program Analyst, (LPA) L. Salazar arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was greeted by Administrator, stated the purpose of the visit and was allowed entry into the facility. During the investigation, LPA toured Resident R1's room and observed them sleeping in their bed, with call button and phone in hand. LPA reviewed facility staff response time in the call log records to be adequate and timely. LPA conducted interviews with family, facility staff and Hospice nurse. LPA reviewed R1's facility file, facility communication logs and Hospice care notes. R1 has been on Hospice care since 2022, and has had a continued decline in their health. Hospice records show R1 sleeps 18+ hours a day, has a decreasing appetite and eats 25 – 50% of meals per day, often refusing to eat. Documentation shows on multiple occasions, that R1 did not want to be touched and did not want the caregivers to change their briefs. LPA observedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 3, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231003124747
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 1
Type B citations3typical 1
Substantiated complaints7typical 2
Total complaints11typical 7
State visits on file27typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025462202445020235932022230
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Kern County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (661) 218-8333

Is Ivy Park At San Lauren licensed?

Yes — Ivy Park At San Lauren is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Bakersfield (Kern County): California license #157208915, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 68 residents. State records list 24 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 8, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Ivy Park At San Lauren care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Ivy Park At San Lauren with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF 68 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN; HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 15 RESIDENTS; NEW MGMT COMPANY; OAKMONT MANAGMENT GROUP LLC EFFECTIVE 04/01/2025.

How much does Ivy Park At San Lauren cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Ivy Park At San Lauren's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Kern County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Ivy Park At San Lauren accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Ivy Park At San Lauren is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

66 of 68 beds occupied (97%) when the state visited on May 8, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Ivy Park At San Lauren?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 27 state visits and 24 dated documents since 2022 for Ivy Park At San Lauren; 11 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 8, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

11 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident has not received a shower for an extended period of time
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 5/8/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rachel Bruce conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit to the facility. During the course of this complaint investigation LPA interviewed staff and residents and obtained and/or reviewed facility records. It was determined based on the interviews and records review that the above allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. Facility did not have hot water available to residents for over 7 days during February 2025. During this time residents had no access to their regular shower and although there was one shower available in another unit, many residents did not know and/or did not feel comfortable so many residents went without a proper shower until the units were repaired. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. See attached citation. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, a cCDSS inspection report, May 8, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250211120402
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility was without hot water in the residential section of the builiding.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On February 19, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rachel Bruce conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit to the facility. During the course of this complaint investigation LPA interviewed staff and residents on duty and obtained and/or reviewed facility records. It was determined based on the interviews and records review that the above allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. Facility did not did not have hot water available to residents for over 7 days. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 Article 5 is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.”) Refer to Case Management dated February 19, 2025 for an additional deficiency. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, a copy of this report with plan of corrections, and appeal rights were provided. SubstantCDSS inspection report, February 19, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250211103342

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained multiple pressure injuries due to staff neglect Resident sustained injury due to staff handling resident in a rough manner Staff did not seek medical attention for resident Staff did not allow hospice to come and provide care for resident Staff are not providing adequate food service for resident Staff left resident in soiled diapers for an extended period of time Staff are not responding to resident's call button Staff did not ensure resident had access to call button
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 01/03/2024, Licensing Program Analyst, (LPA) L. Salazar arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was greeted by Administrator, stated the purpose of the visit and was allowed entry into the facility. During the investigation, LPA toured Resident R1's room and observed them sleeping in their bed, with call button and phone in hand. LPA reviewed facility staff response time in the call log records to be adequate and timely. LPA conducted interviews with family, facility staff and Hospice nurse. LPA reviewed R1's facility file, facility communication logs and Hospice care notes. R1 has been on Hospice care since 2022, and has had a continued decline in their health. Hospice records show R1 sleeps 18+ hours a day, has a decreasing appetite and eats 25 – 50% of meals per day, often refusing to eat. Documentation shows on multiple occasions, that R1 did not want to be touched and did not want the caregivers to change their briefs. LPA observedCDSS inspection report, January 3, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231003124747

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not provide the resident with water
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 07/06/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Salazar arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the required 10-day site inspection. LPA reviewed Hospice Care notes, interviewed Administrator and relative of Resident R1. Based on the information received, we have found that the complaint was Unfounded, meaning that the allegation is false, could not have happened and or is without reasonable basis, therefore, we have dismissed the complaint. No deficiency cited on today's visit. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, July 6, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230626122017
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResident being left in soiled linins/diapers
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 06/14/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Salazar contacted Administrator, Doug Rice to discuss the above allegation. LPA requested Resident R1's Hospice Care Plan and facility communication logs for the month of June 2023. LPA reviewed conducted interviews and reviewed records. Records show R1 is currently receiving Hospice Care services. LPAs review of facility communication logs show R1 stated they did not want to be touched and did not want the caregiver to change their briefs on 06/02/23, 06/03/23, and 06/10/23. A review of hospice care notes show R1 has had a significant decline in their health and is refusing care, medication and is eating less than 25% of their meals. Hospice care is provided 3 days a week which includes treatment for Sacral wound care. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, June 14, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230607104223
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff were not present at the facility. Facility staff did not respond to a resident's pull chord for assistance.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA)'s Shawna Doucette and Darius Williams conducted a visit to commence a complaint investigation and deliver findings. LPA's identified themselves and discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations with Administrator Douglas Rice. LPA requested records for pull chord history from 3/15/23 to 3/31/23 at which Administrator stated he was unable to provide due to the system recording over every 2 days. Administrator submitted days of 4/7/23 and 4/8/23. LPA interviewed staff, residents, and witnesses. LPA obtained a copy of the Fire Departments report regarding this incident. Based on records review and interviews, facility had one staff on duty who was not present at the facility for approximately 30 minutes. Facility staff did not answer pull chords for residents in care. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 8, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230330093440
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not answering call bells timely
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Darius Williams and LPA Shawna Doucette conducted a follow up complaint visit. LPA's met with Administrator, Douglas Rice and discussed the purpose of the visit. LPA Williams interviewed witnesses, the Administrator, and reviewed records. On 3/28/2023, LPA Williams pulled a chord in room 206, which notifies the facility signal system. Staff took approximately 4 minutes and 32 seconds to respond, taken via LPA Williams phone timer. However, according to Kern Fire Department (KFD) record, on 3/29/2023 at approximately 11:02 pm, KFD responded to a residents peronsal pendant. When KFD arrived, no staff could be located in assisted living (addressed on complaint control # 24 - AS - 20230330093440). *Continued on LIC 9099-C* SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 8, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230321111428
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff didn't clean residents room timely Staff did not meet the feeding needs of the resident
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 05/22/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Salazar arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was greeted by Administrator, stated the purpose of the visit and was allowed entry into the facility. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, reviewed medical records and telecommunications documentation. Telecommunication messages of date and time stamp videos show R1's room was not cleaned in a timely manner. LPA observed the LIC602 for Resident R1 dated 10/12/22, which states R1 does not have the capacity for self-care which includes ability to feed self. Interviews with staff state R1 is able to feed self and does not need assistance. Based on the information received, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegations are found to be Substantiated. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, deficiencies are being cited on the attached 9099-D. If not corrected, this posCDSS inspection report, May 22, 2023 · control 24-AS-20221209104049
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not meeting resident's hygiene needs Facility staff are not meeting resident's dietary needs Facility staff are not cleaning resident's room and linens Facility staff do not reposition resident
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 04/14/23, Licensing Program Analyst, (LPA) L. Salazar arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was greeted by Administrator, stated the purpose of the visit and was allowed entry into the facility. During the investigation, LPA toured the facility and Resident R1's room, conducted interviews and records review. LPA observed R1's room and bedding to be clean, free from odor, pests, and debris. R1 was observed in a king size bed that has an adjustable base at the bottom. R1 demonstrated on a hand held remote control, how they reposition their bed if needed. LPA's observed R1's hair and nails to be trimmed and clean. Records review show R1 has been receiving Hospice services and at the end of life. Hospice records show R1 sleeps 18+ hours a day and has a decreasing appetite and eats 25 – 50% of meals per day and often refuses meals. LPA reviewed facility's menus for the month of November and December 2022. LPA observed facility menus to offeCDSS inspection report, April 14, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230131114452
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not administer resident's medication in a timely manner Staff are intimidating resident
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 04/14/23, Licensing Program Analyst, (LPA) L. Salazar arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was greeted by Administrator, stated the purpose of the visit and was allowed entry into the facility. During the investigation, LPA toured the facility and Resident R1's room, conducted interviews and records review. LPA interviewed R1 who denies feeling intimidated by any staff. R1 stated they believe staff speak loudly because it is common that the residents in the facility experience hearing loss. LPA observed R1's Medication Administration Records and Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record to accurately reflect the medication doses have been given according to physician's order. Based on the information received, we have found that the complaint was Unfounded, meaning that the allegations are false, or are without reasonable basis, therefore, we have dismissed the complaint. Exit interview conducted with Administrator and a copyCDSS inspection report, April 14, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230109154022

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 27 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
7
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
11
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
27
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(661) 218-8333
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Ivy Park At San Lauren? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.