Brookdale Riverwalk is a continuing-care retirement community in Bakersfield, Kern County, California — state license #157203395, with a licensed capacity of 376, listed as closed, change of ownership in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 43 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated April 24, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

149 homes in view

Brookdale Riverwalk

The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Continuing-care retirement community · Large community, 376 residents · Bakersfield, CA · Kern County
Closed in state recordWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days · we confirm by phone before any referral
License #157203395, held since 2006 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
350 Calloway Dr · Bakersfield, Kern County
Phone
(661) 587-0221
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 268 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER, 376 AMBULATORY OF WHICH 268 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. BUILDING A, AMBULATORY RESIDENTS ONLY ON 3RD FLOOR. BUILDING B, DELAYED EGRESS APPROVED BY FIRE DEPARTMENT ON 4/18/2006. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR TWENTY-FIVE (25) RESIDENTS.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 55 times and filed 43 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated April 24, 2026.

Most recent state visit
April 24, 2026
Occupancy at the September 10, 2025 visit
248 of 376 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 25 documents with transcribed findings, dated December 20, 2021 to September 25, 2025. 25 of the 25 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unfounded” (7), “Unsubstantiated” (15). 25 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 25 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 22 of 43 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 4 documents
Apr 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20258 state visits · 12 documents
Sep 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that resident's hygiene needs are being met.

On 9/25/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to conduct additional interviews and deliver findings. LPA introduced self and stated purpose of visit. LPA met with Executive Director/Administrator, Jeffrey Toomer to conduct complaint visit. During the subsequent visit, LPA conducted additional interviews and reviewed records. During the course of the investigation, facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted. This department had insufficient information regarding the allegatio listed above. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or disprove that the allegation occurred therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies issued during this complaint visit . Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator for facility records Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250610154056
Sep 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not properly dispose of resident's medications upon termination of services Facility staff did not dispense medications to residents as prescribed

On 09/10/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit. LPA introduced self, stated purpose of visit, and allowed entrance. LPA met with Executive Director (ED)/Administrator (ADM), Jeffrey Toomer to conduct visit. This department investigated the above allegation, during the investigation, facility was toured, interviews conducted and records reviewed. Based on information gathered during interviews and incident report received by department on 5/23/2025, R1 was administered medication belonging to both R2 and R3. R1 and R2 were current residents and R3 last resided at facility on 3/30/25 and medication was still at facility as of date of complaint. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegations of facility staff did not properly dispose of resident's medication upon termination of services and facility staff did not dispense medications to residents as prescribed are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per Calthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250521115419
Aug 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure medications are dispensed to residents in a timely manner Staff do not ensure medications are properly managed for residents in care

On 8/06/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPAs) M. Medina and J. Duarte arrived to conduct an initial 10-day complaint visit. LPAs stated purpose of visit and met with Jeffrey Toomer, Administrator/Executive Director and Martha Fernandez, Health & Wellness Director to conduct visit. LPAs conducted facility tour, conducted interviews, and gathered documentation during complaint visit. This department had insufficient information regarding the allegations listed above. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or disprove that the allegations occurred therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report will be provided to Executive Director via e-mail due to technical difficulties. No deficiencies issued during this complaint visit . Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 6, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250730140347
May 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility staff do not follow infection control requirements

On 5/14/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to conduct additional interviews and deliver findings. LPA introduced self and stated purpose of visit and allowed entrance. LPA met with Executive Director/Administrator, Jeffrey Toomer during visit. This Department investigated the allegations of facility staff do not follow infection control requirements. During the interviews and record review it was determined that infection control practices are in place and proper procedures are followed to protect the health and safety of residents in care. This Department has found that the above allegations are UNFOUNDED, meaning they were false, could not have happened, and/or were without reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250225145623
May 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff leave residents soiled residents for extended period of time.

On 5/14/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to conduct additional interviews and deliver findings. LPA introduced self, presented identification and allowed entrance. LPA met with Jeffrey Toomer, Executive Director/Administrator and Sarah Archuelta-Weaver, Health and Wellness Director to conduct visit. During complaint investigation, LPA toured facility, reviewed resident files, and conducted interviews. This department had insufficient information regarding the allegations listed above. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or disprove that the allegations occurred therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies issued during this complaint visit . Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator for facility records Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250224120511
May 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure a safe environment was provided for residents Staff did not ensure resident rooms were adequately cleaned Staff did not ensure facility was free from odors

On 4/07/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to conduct additional interviews and deliver findings. LPA introduced self and stated purpose of visit and allowed entrance. LPA met with Executive Director/Administrator, Jeffrey Toomer and Sarah Aruchelta-Weaver, Health & Welness Director to conduct subsequent facility tour. LPA conducted subsequent facility tour. During the course of the investigation, facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted. This department had insufficient information regarding the allegations listed above. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or disprove that the allegations occurred therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies issued during this complaint visit . Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator for facility records Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 7, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250121151334
Feb 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 5 documents
Nov 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not meeting resident's toileting needs

On 11/15/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to conduct additional interviews and deliver findings. LPA introduced self and stated purpose of visit and allowed entrance. LPA met with Executive Director/Administrator, Jeffrey Toomer during visit. During the course of the investigation, facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted. This department had insufficient information regarding the allegations listed above. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or disprove that the allegations occurred therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies issued during this complaint visit . Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator for facility records Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 15, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240821164448
Nov 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff behavior poses as a risk to the residents Staff do not address the residents alerts timely Staff do not provide adequate care and supervision

On 11/15/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to conduct additional interviews and deliver findings. LPA introduced self and stated purpose of visit and allowed entrance. LPA met with Executive Director/Administrator, Jeffrey Toomer during visit. During the course of the investigation, facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted. This department had insufficient information regarding the allegations listed above. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or disprove that the allegations occurred therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies issued during this complaint visit . Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator for facility records Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 15, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240819162509
Jul 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair

On 7/08/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint visit. LPA introduced self and stated purpose of visit. LPA met with Jeff Toomer, Executive Director. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, toured facility grounds and toured Building A. Based on information gathered during interviews, and observations made by LPA during facility tour, it was reported that facility was in disrepair, however, all thermostats observed to be within Title 22 regulation of 78-85 degrees, resident rooms are all individually controlled and varied in temperature. During tour of facility grounds, it was observed that there is an estimated 70 parking lights throughout grounds, with a minimum of 3 that have needed within the last 2 months. This Department has found that the above allegation is UNFOUNDED, meaning they were false, could not have happened, and/or were without reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. An exit intervthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 8, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240628140021
May 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 11, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent residents from falling while in care Staff did not meet residents' hygiene needs Staff did not adequately supervise residents resulting in residents wandering out of the facility

On 10/11/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted a subsequent unannounced 10-day complaint visit. LPA met with Jeffrey Toomer, Executive Director and stated purpose of visit. LPA gathered additional information and delivered findings during visit. During the course of the investigation, the department conducted a facility tour, interviews and reviewed facility records. During review of records, LPA observed that staffing is adequate for residents in care, all exits to exterior of building are delayed egress, alarmed, and have keyless entry. Shower schedules reviewed, and all refusals by residents for showers are documented in resident files. Based on interviews and record review the allegations listed are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. No deficiencies issued. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report provided for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 11, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230921081034
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations3typical 1
Type B citations5typical 1
Substantiated complaints8typical 2
Total complaints30typical 7
State visits on file55typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2006.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026140202581212024350202369020229922021340
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Kern County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one.
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →

Is Brookdale Riverwalk licensed?

No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Brookdale Riverwalk in Bakersfield (Kern County), California license #157203395, as “Closed, Change Of Ownership, formerly licensed for 376 residents. State records list 43 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated April 24, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Brookdale Riverwalk care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Brookdale Riverwalk with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER, 376 AMBULATORY OF WHICH 268 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. BUILDING A, AMBULATORY RESIDENTS ONLY ON 3RD FLOOR. BUILDING B, DELAYED EGRESS APPROVED BY FIRE DEPARTMENT ON 4/18/2006. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR TWENTY-FIVE (25) RESIDENTS.

How much does Brookdale Riverwalk cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Brookdale Riverwalk's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Kern County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Brookdale Riverwalk accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Brookdale Riverwalk is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

248 of 376 beds occupied (66%) when the state visited on September 10, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Brookdale Riverwalk?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 55 state visits and 43 dated documents since 2021 for Brookdale Riverwalk; 25 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated September 25, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

25 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure that resident's hygiene needs are being met.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 9/25/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to conduct additional interviews and deliver findings. LPA introduced self and stated purpose of visit. LPA met with Executive Director/Administrator, Jeffrey Toomer to conduct complaint visit. During the subsequent visit, LPA conducted additional interviews and reviewed records. During the course of the investigation, facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted. This department had insufficient information regarding the allegatio listed above. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or disprove that the allegation occurred therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies issued during this complaint visit . Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator for facility records UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 25, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250610154056
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not properly dispose of resident's medications upon termination of services Facility staff did not dispense medications to residents as prescribed
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 09/10/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit. LPA introduced self, stated purpose of visit, and allowed entrance. LPA met with Executive Director (ED)/Administrator (ADM), Jeffrey Toomer to conduct visit. This department investigated the above allegation, during the investigation, facility was toured, interviews conducted and records reviewed. Based on information gathered during interviews and incident report received by department on 5/23/2025, R1 was administered medication belonging to both R2 and R3. R1 and R2 were current residents and R3 last resided at facility on 3/30/25 and medication was still at facility as of date of complaint. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegations of facility staff did not properly dispose of resident's medication upon termination of services and facility staff did not dispense medications to residents as prescribed are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per CalCDSS inspection report, September 10, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250521115419
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure medications are dispensed to residents in a timely manner Staff do not ensure medications are properly managed for residents in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 8/06/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPAs) M. Medina and J. Duarte arrived to conduct an initial 10-day complaint visit. LPAs stated purpose of visit and met with Jeffrey Toomer, Administrator/Executive Director and Martha Fernandez, Health & Wellness Director to conduct visit. LPAs conducted facility tour, conducted interviews, and gathered documentation during complaint visit. This department had insufficient information regarding the allegations listed above. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or disprove that the allegations occurred therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report will be provided to Executive Director via e-mail due to technical difficulties. No deficiencies issued during this complaint visit . UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 6, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250730140347
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff do not follow infection control requirements
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 5/14/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to conduct additional interviews and deliver findings. LPA introduced self and stated purpose of visit and allowed entrance. LPA met with Executive Director/Administrator, Jeffrey Toomer during visit. This Department investigated the allegations of facility staff do not follow infection control requirements. During the interviews and record review it was determined that infection control practices are in place and proper procedures are followed to protect the health and safety of residents in care. This Department has found that the above allegations are UNFOUNDED, meaning they were false, could not have happened, and/or were without reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, May 14, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250225145623
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff leave residents soiled residents for extended period of time.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 5/14/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to conduct additional interviews and deliver findings. LPA introduced self, presented identification and allowed entrance. LPA met with Jeffrey Toomer, Executive Director/Administrator and Sarah Archuelta-Weaver, Health and Wellness Director to conduct visit. During complaint investigation, LPA toured facility, reviewed resident files, and conducted interviews. This department had insufficient information regarding the allegations listed above. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or disprove that the allegations occurred therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies issued during this complaint visit . Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator for facility records UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 14, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250224120511
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure a safe environment was provided for residents Staff did not ensure resident rooms were adequately cleaned Staff did not ensure facility was free from odors
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 4/07/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to conduct additional interviews and deliver findings. LPA introduced self and stated purpose of visit and allowed entrance. LPA met with Executive Director/Administrator, Jeffrey Toomer and Sarah Aruchelta-Weaver, Health & Welness Director to conduct subsequent facility tour. LPA conducted subsequent facility tour. During the course of the investigation, facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted. This department had insufficient information regarding the allegations listed above. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or disprove that the allegations occurred therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies issued during this complaint visit . Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator for facility records UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 7, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250121151334

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not meeting resident's toileting needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 11/15/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to conduct additional interviews and deliver findings. LPA introduced self and stated purpose of visit and allowed entrance. LPA met with Executive Director/Administrator, Jeffrey Toomer during visit. During the course of the investigation, facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted. This department had insufficient information regarding the allegations listed above. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or disprove that the allegations occurred therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies issued during this complaint visit . Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator for facility records UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 15, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240821164448
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff behavior poses as a risk to the residents Staff do not address the residents alerts timely Staff do not provide adequate care and supervision
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 11/15/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to conduct additional interviews and deliver findings. LPA introduced self and stated purpose of visit and allowed entrance. LPA met with Executive Director/Administrator, Jeffrey Toomer during visit. During the course of the investigation, facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted. This department had insufficient information regarding the allegations listed above. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or disprove that the allegations occurred therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies issued during this complaint visit . Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator for facility records UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 15, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240819162509
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is in disrepair
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 7/08/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint visit. LPA introduced self and stated purpose of visit. LPA met with Jeff Toomer, Executive Director. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, toured facility grounds and toured Building A. Based on information gathered during interviews, and observations made by LPA during facility tour, it was reported that facility was in disrepair, however, all thermostats observed to be within Title 22 regulation of 78-85 degrees, resident rooms are all individually controlled and varied in temperature. During tour of facility grounds, it was observed that there is an estimated 70 parking lights throughout grounds, with a minimum of 3 that have needed within the last 2 months. This Department has found that the above allegation is UNFOUNDED, meaning they were false, could not have happened, and/or were without reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. An exit intervCDSS inspection report, July 8, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240628140021

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent residents from falling while in care Staff did not meet residents' hygiene needs Staff did not adequately supervise residents resulting in residents wandering out of the facility
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/11/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted a subsequent unannounced 10-day complaint visit. LPA met with Jeffrey Toomer, Executive Director and stated purpose of visit. LPA gathered additional information and delivered findings during visit. During the course of the investigation, the department conducted a facility tour, interviews and reviewed facility records. During review of records, LPA observed that staffing is adequate for residents in care, all exits to exterior of building are delayed egress, alarmed, and have keyless entry. Shower schedules reviewed, and all refusals by residents for showers are documented in resident files. Based on interviews and record review the allegations listed are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. No deficiencies issued. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report provided for facility records.CDSS inspection report, October 11, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230921081034
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedQuestionable death
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 7/27/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted a subsequent visit to deliver findings on this complaint. LPA met with Jeffrey Toomer, Executive Director and stated purpose of visit. This Department investigated the allegation Questionable Death and based on review of records, the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED as the cause of R1's death was due to medical conditions. No deficiency cited. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided for facility records. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 27, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230131153349
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident in care has access to a knife Facility is not kept free of pests
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 7/27/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted a subsequent visit to deliver findings on this complaint. LPA met with Jeffrey Toomer and stated purpose of visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured facility, conducted interviews and gathered documentation. Based on review of records and interviews conducted, the allegations of resident in care has access to a knife and facility is not kept free of pests are UNSUBSTANTIATED. During interviews and review of records, LPA received copies that R1's apartment was treated for pests on 6/15/23 prior to department receiving complaint and there is no evidence to show that resident has access to a knife in their apartment. NoCDSS inspection report, July 27, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230613152947
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure the facility was free from bed bugs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 07/27/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint visit. LPA met with Jeffrey Toomer, Executive Director and stated purpose of visit. During the course of the investigation, the department conducted interviews and reviewed records from facilities. It was reported to Department that facility had bed bugs in bingo room and claims of residents reporting same problem. Per Executive Director, there was a report from a resident reporting bed bugs, however, facility had problem treated professionally on 7/18/23 and 7/19/23 which was prior to complaint being received in Department. Based on interviews and record review the allegation of staff did not ensure facility was free from bed bugs is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. No deficiencies issued. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report provided for facilityCDSS inspection report, July 27, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230724095300
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff neglect resulted in resident hospitalization
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 06/23/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit. LPA met with Jeffrey Toomer, Executive Director and Sarah Weaver, Health and Wellness Director to conduct today's visit. During complaint investigation LPA conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. Upon review of facility records, R1 has not been a resident of Independent Living, Assisted Living or Memory Care. This Department investigated the complaint alleging facility staff neglect resulted in resident hospitalization. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies issued during this inspection. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Executive Director for facility records. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, June 23, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230315113913
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained a fall while in care Staff failed to report an incident to the resident's authorized representative Staff do not answer phone calls
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 06/23/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit. LPA met with Jeffrey Toomer, Executive Director to conduct to visit During complaint investigation LPA conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. Upon review of facility records, R1 has not been a resident of Independent Living, Assisted Living or Memory Care since 4/18/22. This Department investigated the complaint alleging resident sustained a fall while in care, staff failed to report an incident to the resident's authorized representative and staff do not answer phone calls. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, June 23, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230403083422
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff is not allowing resident to have visitors
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 02/23/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit. Executive Director was not available to conduct today's visit. LPA met with Health and Wellness Director, Sarah Weaver. LPA received toured facility, reviewed and recieved copies of resident (R1) documents. Upon review of R1 file, there is a court order of no contact on file with facility. This Department investigated the complaint alleging facility staff is not allowing resident to have visitors. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies issued during this inspection. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Health and Wellness Director for facility records. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, February 23, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230215145002

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 55 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
5
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
8
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
30
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
55
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(661) 587-0221
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Brookdale Riverwalk? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.