Autumn Ridge Assisted Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Kerman, Fresno County, California — state license #107209492, licensed for 54 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 19 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2024, the most recent dated July 14, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

1 home in view

Autumn Ridge Assisted Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 54 residents · Kerman, CA · Fresno County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #107209492, held since 2024 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
14280 W Stanislaus Ave · Kerman, Fresno County
Phone
(661) 972-4646
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 54 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 15 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 4 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 54 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 4 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (15).State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2024, the state has visited this home 22 times and filed 19 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 14, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 14, 2026
Occupancy at the June 2, 2026 visit
49 of 54 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 9 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 12, 2025 to June 2, 2026. 9 of the 9 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (5). 9 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 9 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 19 of 19 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20264 state visits · 4 documents
Jul 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 2, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not allow resident in care to use the telephone Staff spoke inappropriately to residents in care

On 06/02/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct an initial complaint investigation. LPA met with Administrator Karen Dhaliwal and stated the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, the facility was toured and interviews were conducted. Residents confirm staff allow residents to use the facility telephone and do not speak to the residents inappropriately. Based on interviews conducted, the preponderance evident has not been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this report. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 2, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260528101611
May 28, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was left unattended

On this date 01/12/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang conducted initial complaint investigation. LPA introduce self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Administrator Karen Dhaliwal. LPA discussed complaint and delivered complaint findings to Administrator. During the course of the investigation, the department conducted interviews, records were reviewed, and the facility was toured. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, R1's current physician report documents that the resident cannot leave the facility unsupervised. Interviews confirmed R1 had left the facility premises with R2 without staff supervision on 01/06/26, therefore, the preponderance of evidence has been met, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to Administrator, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this report. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 12, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260107172854
20258 state visits · 12 documents
Sep 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained severe pressure injuries due to staff neglect Staff are not providing adequate food service to residents Staff are not providing residents authorized representative with resident's documents Staff are not ensuring the facility is clean

On 09/12/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to delivered complaint findings on the above allegations. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Administrator Karen Dhaliwal. During the course of the investigation, the department conducted interviews, received copies of records, and toured the facility. Based on interviews conducted, records reviewed, and observations, R1 is received hospice care for pressure injury. Staff assist in feeding food for residents that requires feeding. Facility provided requested documents to resident’s authorized representative. Facility was observed inside and outside. Facility was observed to be cleaned and free of odor. Therefore, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this report. Unsubstantiatethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 12, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250715135159
Aug 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect/ Lack of care and supervision resulting in resident having scabies

On 08/22/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to deliver complaint findings. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Administrator Karen Dhaliwal. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews, records were reviewed and toured the facility. R1 developed skin rashes that were not diagnosis as scabies. The facility has notified R1’s physician and treatment has been provided for R1’s skin rash. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided Administrator, whose signature confirms received of this report. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 22, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250630150714
Jun 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure residents expired medications are discarded

On 06/17/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct initial complaint investigation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Administrator Karen Dhaliwal and Licensed Vocational Nurse Diane Cramer. LPA delivered complaint findings. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews, toured the facility, and reviewed records. Discontinued medications were stored in medication room unlogged and not disposed. Interview with staff confirms expired medications and medications for former residents has not been logged and disposed back dated to March 2025. Based on observations and interviews conducted, the preponderance evident has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to the Administrator, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this report. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250513154609
Jun 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure that residents are provided with a safe environment. Staff are not properly trained. Staff do not provided adequate laundry services.

On 05/09/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct initial complaint investigation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Administrator Karen Dhaliwal and Licensed Vocational Nurse Diane Cramer. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit and delivered complaint findings. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews, toured the facility, and reviewed records. Facility is doing resident’s laundry on laundry schedule date, after resident’s shower date, and as needed. Staff completed required trainings and are redirecting residents. Based on interview conducted, observation, and records reviewed, there was insufficient evidence to prove or disprove that staff did not ensure that residents are provided with a safe environment, staff not properly trained, and staff did not provide adequate laundry services. Therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 9, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250508124643
May 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff not responding to client's calls for assistance in a timely manner

On 04/16/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct initial complaint investigation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Administrator Karen Dhaliwal. LPA delivered complaint findings. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews, toured the facility with Administrator and reviewed records. Administrator stated that call pendants are responded to within 10 to 15 minutes. Administrator and LPA observed a sample of residents' call pendant in which were not responded to in a timely manner upon activation. Based on observation and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report and appeals was provided to the Administrator, whose signature on this form confirmthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250411152911
Mar 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff allows resident to smoke while oxygen tank(s) are in use. Staff allows resident to have access to a lighter. Unqualified staff disposing medications.

On 03/24/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct complaint investigation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Administrator Karen Dhaliwal. LPA deliver complaint findings on the above allegations. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews, toured the facility, and reviewed records. Resident was observed requesting for cigarette from staff and staff lighting cigarette for resident outside. The department observed resident smoking outside in designated area. Disposed medications are disposed by medication technicians and management staff into a pharmaceutical container. Based on interviews conducted, observations, and records reviewed, preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided to the Administrator, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of tthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 24, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250318164041
Mar 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure that facility's appliances are maintained in good repair

On 03/12/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct initial complaint investigation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Administrator Karen Dhaliwal. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, toured the facility, and reviewed records. Refrigerators were observed operational and in good repair. Refrigerator temperature was maintained at 36 degrees F. Frozen food was observed stored in refrigerator. A freezer was observed in the facility kitchen non-operational. Based on observation, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBTANTIATED. A copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to the Administrator, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this report. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250311151837
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints4typical 2
Total complaints9typical 7
State visits on file22typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2024.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026441202581232024330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Fresno County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (661) 972-4646

Is Autumn Ridge Assisted Living licensed?

Yes — Autumn Ridge Assisted Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Kerman (Fresno County): California license #107209492, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 54 residents. State records list 19 inspection and complaint documents since 2024; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 14, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Autumn Ridge Assisted Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Autumn Ridge Assisted Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 54 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 4 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (15).

How much does Autumn Ridge Assisted Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Autumn Ridge Assisted Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Fresno County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Autumn Ridge Assisted Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Autumn Ridge Assisted Living through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Fresno County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

49 of 54 beds occupied (91%) when the state visited on June 2, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Autumn Ridge Assisted Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 22 state visits and 19 dated documents since 2024 for Autumn Ridge Assisted Living; 9 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated June 2, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

9 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not allow resident in care to use the telephone Staff spoke inappropriately to residents in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 06/02/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct an initial complaint investigation. LPA met with Administrator Karen Dhaliwal and stated the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, the facility was toured and interviews were conducted. Residents confirm staff allow residents to use the facility telephone and do not speak to the residents inappropriately. Based on interviews conducted, the preponderance evident has not been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this report. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 2, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260528101611
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was left unattended
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On this date 01/12/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang conducted initial complaint investigation. LPA introduce self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Administrator Karen Dhaliwal. LPA discussed complaint and delivered complaint findings to Administrator. During the course of the investigation, the department conducted interviews, records were reviewed, and the facility was toured. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, R1's current physician report documents that the resident cannot leave the facility unsupervised. Interviews confirmed R1 had left the facility premises with R2 without staff supervision on 01/06/26, therefore, the preponderance of evidence has been met, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to Administrator, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this report. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 12, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260107172854

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained severe pressure injuries due to staff neglect Staff are not providing adequate food service to residents Staff are not providing residents authorized representative with resident's documents Staff are not ensuring the facility is clean
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 09/12/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to delivered complaint findings on the above allegations. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Administrator Karen Dhaliwal. During the course of the investigation, the department conducted interviews, received copies of records, and toured the facility. Based on interviews conducted, records reviewed, and observations, R1 is received hospice care for pressure injury. Staff assist in feeding food for residents that requires feeding. Facility provided requested documents to resident’s authorized representative. Facility was observed inside and outside. Facility was observed to be cleaned and free of odor. Therefore, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this report. UnsubstantiateCDSS inspection report, September 12, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250715135159
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect/ Lack of care and supervision resulting in resident having scabies
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 08/22/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to deliver complaint findings. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Administrator Karen Dhaliwal. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews, records were reviewed and toured the facility. R1 developed skin rashes that were not diagnosis as scabies. The facility has notified R1’s physician and treatment has been provided for R1’s skin rash. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided Administrator, whose signature confirms received of this report. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 22, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250630150714
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure residents expired medications are discarded
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 06/17/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct initial complaint investigation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Administrator Karen Dhaliwal and Licensed Vocational Nurse Diane Cramer. LPA delivered complaint findings. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews, toured the facility, and reviewed records. Discontinued medications were stored in medication room unlogged and not disposed. Interview with staff confirms expired medications and medications for former residents has not been logged and disposed back dated to March 2025. Based on observations and interviews conducted, the preponderance evident has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to the Administrator, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this report. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 17, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250513154609
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure that residents are provided with a safe environment. Staff are not properly trained. Staff do not provided adequate laundry services.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 05/09/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct initial complaint investigation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Administrator Karen Dhaliwal and Licensed Vocational Nurse Diane Cramer. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit and delivered complaint findings. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews, toured the facility, and reviewed records. Facility is doing resident’s laundry on laundry schedule date, after resident’s shower date, and as needed. Staff completed required trainings and are redirecting residents. Based on interview conducted, observation, and records reviewed, there was insufficient evidence to prove or disprove that staff did not ensure that residents are provided with a safe environment, staff not properly trained, and staff did not provide adequate laundry services. Therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted.CDSS inspection report, May 9, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250508124643
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff not responding to client's calls for assistance in a timely manner
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 04/16/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct initial complaint investigation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Administrator Karen Dhaliwal. LPA delivered complaint findings. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews, toured the facility with Administrator and reviewed records. Administrator stated that call pendants are responded to within 10 to 15 minutes. Administrator and LPA observed a sample of residents' call pendant in which were not responded to in a timely manner upon activation. Based on observation and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report and appeals was provided to the Administrator, whose signature on this form confirmCDSS inspection report, April 16, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250411152911
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff allows resident to smoke while oxygen tank(s) are in use. Staff allows resident to have access to a lighter. Unqualified staff disposing medications.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 03/24/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct complaint investigation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Administrator Karen Dhaliwal. LPA deliver complaint findings on the above allegations. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews, toured the facility, and reviewed records. Resident was observed requesting for cigarette from staff and staff lighting cigarette for resident outside. The department observed resident smoking outside in designated area. Disposed medications are disposed by medication technicians and management staff into a pharmaceutical container. Based on interviews conducted, observations, and records reviewed, preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided to the Administrator, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of tCDSS inspection report, March 24, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250318164041
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee does not ensure that facility's appliances are maintained in good repair
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 03/12/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct initial complaint investigation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Administrator Karen Dhaliwal. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, toured the facility, and reviewed records. Refrigerators were observed operational and in good repair. Refrigerator temperature was maintained at 36 degrees F. Frozen food was observed stored in refrigerator. A freezer was observed in the facility kitchen non-operational. Based on observation, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBTANTIATED. A copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to the Administrator, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this report. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 12, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250311151837

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 22 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
4
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
9
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
22
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(661) 972-4646
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Autumn Ridge Assisted Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.