Magnolia Crossing is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Clovis, Fresno County, California — state license #107208838, licensed for 60 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 25 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated February 5, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

24 homes in view

Magnolia Crossing

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 60 residents · Clovis, CA · Fresno County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #107208838, held since 2018 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
32 W Sierra Ave · Clovis, Fresno County
Phone
(559) 765-4916
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 60 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 6 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 60 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR SIX(6).State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 31 times and filed 25 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated February 5, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 14, 2026
Occupancy at the May 6, 2025 visit
45 of 60 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 13 documents with transcribed findings, dated June 29, 2022 to May 6, 2025. 13 of the 13 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (9). 13 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 13 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 14 of 25 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Feb 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20252 state visits · 3 documents
May 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not provide resident file as requested

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daiquiri Boyd conducted the subsequent complaint investigation visit to the facility. During the course of this complaint investigation LPA spoke with staff and obtained and/or reviewed facility records and emails. It was determined based on interviews and records review that the above allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. Facility did not provide a copy of the resident file as requested to the resident and/or resident's responsible party within 2 days as stated. Based on LPAs observations and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Health and Safety Code 1569.269(a)(21) is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 6, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250407133544
Feb 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20248 state visits · 8 documents
Dec 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff neglect resulted in a resident sustaining a fracture while in care Staff are mishandling the residents medications Staff are inappropriately administering the residents medications Staff did not properly report incidents involving the residents Staff are not being properly trained Staff did not provide adequate care and supervision to the residents Staff did not prevent the residents from engaging in an altercation Staff do not respond timely to the resident alerts Staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident

On 10/18/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted a subsequent unannounced complaint visit to conduct interviews and deliver findings. LPA introduced self, stated purpose of visit, and met with Administrator, Constance Peters. This department investigated the above allegations during the investigation, LPA toured facility, conducted interviews, and reviewed records. This department had insufficient information regarding the allegations listed above. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or disprove that the allegations occurred therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies issued during this complaint visit . Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator for facility records Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 18, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240529155053
Oct 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 31, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 27, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings. Staff did not provide adequate food service to residents. Staff did not notify resident's authorized representative of a change in resident’s condition. Staff did not assist residents with bathing in a timely manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Flores arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver findings on this investigation. LPA met with Facility Administrator, Constance Peters and announced the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted interviews, observations, and record reviews. Regarding staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings. LPA conducted interviews, record review and LIC621 form. There was no supportive documentation found on file to support that resident's belongings were not safeguard. Regarding staff did not provide adequate food service to residents. Based on conducted observations, file reviews, and interviews this allegation was found unsubstantiated. Continue 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240126102342
Feb 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff handle resident in a rough manner Staff emotionally abuses resident Staff do not assist resident with ambulating Staff do not assist resident with personal care Staff do not assist resident with incontinence needs Staff spoke inappropriately to resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Flores arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver findings on this investigation. LPA met with Facility Administrator, Constance Peters and announced the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted interviews, observations, and record reviews. Regarding staff handling residents in a rough manner, LPA interview four residents. Three of the four residents reported they have not seen or heard staff handle residents in a rough manner. One resident reported hearing from other residents that residents are handled in a rough manner. Continue 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 6, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231201155005
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 8, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not administer resident's medications as prescribed Staff do not assist resident in receiving physical therapy as needed Staff do not assist resident with mobility needs

On 12/08/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Flores arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Constance Peters to discuss the elements of the allegations. Regarding the allegation, staff do not administer resident’s medication as prescribed. Based on interviews and record reviews, it is unclear weather or not R1’s medication was not administered as prescribed. LIC602A physician’s report state R1 can leave the facility unsupervised and able to administer own prescription medication. R1 has prescribed medication that facility cannot administer without physician’s orders. Continue page 2 - 9099C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 8, 2023 · control 24-AS-20231013160821
Sep 12, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints4typical 2
Total complaints12typical 7
State visits on file31typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2018.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020252312024880202391112022231
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Fresno County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (559) 765-4916

Is Magnolia Crossing licensed?

Yes — Magnolia Crossing is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Clovis (Fresno County): California license #107208838, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 60 residents. State records list 25 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated February 5, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Magnolia Crossing care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Magnolia Crossing with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 60 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR SIX(6).

How much does Magnolia Crossing cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Magnolia Crossing's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Fresno County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Magnolia Crossing accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Magnolia Crossing through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Fresno County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

45 of 60 beds occupied (75%) when the state visited on May 6, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Magnolia Crossing?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 31 state visits and 25 dated documents since 2022 for Magnolia Crossing; 13 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 6, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

13 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not provide resident file as requested
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daiquiri Boyd conducted the subsequent complaint investigation visit to the facility. During the course of this complaint investigation LPA spoke with staff and obtained and/or reviewed facility records and emails. It was determined based on interviews and records review that the above allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. Facility did not provide a copy of the resident file as requested to the resident and/or resident's responsible party within 2 days as stated. Based on LPAs observations and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Health and Safety Code 1569.269(a)(21) is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 6, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250407133544

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff neglect resulted in a resident sustaining a fracture while in care Staff are mishandling the residents medications Staff are inappropriately administering the residents medications Staff did not properly report incidents involving the residents Staff are not being properly trained Staff did not provide adequate care and supervision to the residents Staff did not prevent the residents from engaging in an altercation Staff do not respond timely to the resident alerts Staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/18/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted a subsequent unannounced complaint visit to conduct interviews and deliver findings. LPA introduced self, stated purpose of visit, and met with Administrator, Constance Peters. This department investigated the above allegations during the investigation, LPA toured facility, conducted interviews, and reviewed records. This department had insufficient information regarding the allegations listed above. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or disprove that the allegations occurred therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies issued during this complaint visit . Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator for facility records UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 18, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240529155053
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings. Staff did not provide adequate food service to residents. Staff did not notify resident's authorized representative of a change in resident’s condition. Staff did not assist residents with bathing in a timely manner.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Flores arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver findings on this investigation. LPA met with Facility Administrator, Constance Peters and announced the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted interviews, observations, and record reviews. Regarding staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings. LPA conducted interviews, record review and LIC621 form. There was no supportive documentation found on file to support that resident's belongings were not safeguard. Regarding staff did not provide adequate food service to residents. Based on conducted observations, file reviews, and interviews this allegation was found unsubstantiated. Continue 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 27, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240126102342
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff handle resident in a rough manner Staff emotionally abuses resident Staff do not assist resident with ambulating Staff do not assist resident with personal care Staff do not assist resident with incontinence needs Staff spoke inappropriately to resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Flores arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver findings on this investigation. LPA met with Facility Administrator, Constance Peters and announced the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted interviews, observations, and record reviews. Regarding staff handling residents in a rough manner, LPA interview four residents. Three of the four residents reported they have not seen or heard staff handle residents in a rough manner. One resident reported hearing from other residents that residents are handled in a rough manner. Continue 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 6, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231201155005

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not administer resident's medications as prescribed Staff do not assist resident in receiving physical therapy as needed Staff do not assist resident with mobility needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 12/08/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Flores arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Constance Peters to discuss the elements of the allegations. Regarding the allegation, staff do not administer resident’s medication as prescribed. Based on interviews and record reviews, it is unclear weather or not R1’s medication was not administered as prescribed. LIC602A physician’s report state R1 can leave the facility unsupervised and able to administer own prescription medication. R1 has prescribed medication that facility cannot administer without physician’s orders. Continue page 2 - 9099C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 8, 2023 · control 24-AS-20231013160821
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not seek medical attention for a resident. Staff did not dispense residents’ medication as prescribed.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 08/04/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Constance Peters announced the purpose of the inspection. Regarding the allegation staff did not seek medical attention for a resident. LPA Hurt reviewed Centrally Stored Medication Logs, Medication Administration Records, and medications for Resident 1, and Resident 2. LPA Hurt spoke with three facility staff who agreed the Medication Administration Record has several errors, and the count was not always done at the end of each shift. Based on this it is unclear if there was a medication error or if medical attention was needed for Resident 1. Based on interviews conducted, documentation obtained and reviewed during this investigation by Department of Social Services staff this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence toCDSS inspection report, August 4, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230724091124
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff using profanity toward residents Staff is falsifying resident records Staff is engaging in inappropriate activites infront of residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Darius Williams conducted an unannounced follow up visit. LPA Williams met with Administrator, Constance Peters. LPA Williams conducted interviews, observations, and record revie In regards to staff using profanity towards residents, LPA interview four residents. Resident 4, 7, and 8 reported they have not seen or heard staff use profanity toward residents. Resident 2 reported hearing someone use profanity while they were in their room, but did not see if the individual was a resident or staff or who they were speaking to. In regards to staff falsifying records. LPA spoke with Staff 1 who reported if residents decline to eat or want to eat in their room, they informs the manager. *Continued on LIC 9099-C* UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 17, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230620122450
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff provides care to residents while under the influence of marijuana. Staff do not ensure that infection control practices are maintained when handling medication.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Xiong conducted the complaint investigation visit to the facility. LPA met with Administrator Constance Peters and informed her the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA delivered investigation findings regarding the above allegations.The Department has investigated the complaint alleging: Staff provides care to residents while under the influence of marijuana, and Staff do not ensure that infection control practices are maintained when handling medication. Based on the interviews conducted and/or records review the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 23, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230619090724
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are restricting residents vistors.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced facility visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA Hurt met with facility Administrator Constance Peters and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation staff are resricting residents vistors. Witness 1 attempted to visit Resident 1 on April 19, 2023 and was told by facility staff he would not be allowed to visit, or speak to Resident 1 without supervision. LPA Hurt spoke with Resident 1 who stated he was ok with Witness 1 visiting him, and he does not want to deny anyone from visiting him. LPA Hurt reviewed the Power of Attorney documents for Resident 1, and there is no section mentioning visitors or restriction of specific visitors.. Resident 1's Power of Attorney has not provided any documents proving anyone is legally ordered to stay away from Resident 1. Based on the interviews conducted, documentation obtained and reviewed, and the information received during this investigation,CDSS inspection report, June 2, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230424172045
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure facility ovens are working properly
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 5/31/23 at 8:20 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Malia Thao arrived unannounced to conduct an initial 10-day complaint inspection. LPA explained reason for inspection and was granted entry by Administrator (ADM) Constance Peters. LPA conducted interviews and toured the three buildings. LPA observed each building with a kitchen that has a double oven. LPA observed all six ovens operational and heating up. The allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was given to Administrator, whose signature confirms receipt of this report. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, May 31, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230525082016
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff administering medication while under the influence
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 02/21/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Walton arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegations, LPA introdcued self, stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with Administrator. LPA met with Administrator, Lai Saeteurn. During this investigation, LPA reviewed records and interviewed facility staff. Based on interviews conducted, the allegation: Staff administering medication while under the influence is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. No deficeincies issued during this inspection. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was dicussed and provided to Administrator, Lai Saereurn, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this document. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 21, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230109110932

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 31 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
4
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
12
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
31
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(559) 765-4916
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Magnolia Crossing? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.